30.4.10

Strategies for Invading America in the Era of SB 1070


















http://voiceoflillpop.blogspot.com/2010/04/strategies-for-invading-america-in-era.html



Satire by John W. Lillpop


In light of Arizona’s tough new anti-illegal alien law, officials in the Mexican government have rushed through a revised guideline for invading America booklet,meant to help the prospective illegal alien get out of Mexico and onto the backs of American taxpayers with ease and comfort.

The booklet is published in both Spanish and Mexican, and includes maps and photos of landing spots for the newly arrived illegal alien.

A handy list of phone numbers including that of Janet Napolitano, the ACLU, and other corrupt immigration attorneys is provided.

Entitled, “Strategies for Invading America in the Era of SB 1070,” the booklet is available in all Mexican schools, banks, restaurants, government offices, churches, hospitals, prisons, confession booths, and travel agencies.

It is also available in America at Mexican embassies, Catholic Church parishes, Le Reza meetings, branches of the DNC, Janet Napolitano’s office, and by visiting Nancy Pelosi’s website, pelosinvadeamerica.guv.

By simply registering five or more illegal aliens as Democrats at Pelosi’s site, a free booklet will be shipped Overnight Express, franking courtesy of the U.S. Treasury.

When boiled down to its most base element, this strategy is a break through discovery in criminal behavior, exploitation of America’s ludicrous legal system, affirmative action fraud, all based on a liberal population intent on national suicide.

Winning the battle against America’s anti-Hispanic hatred involves the following actions:

The first step for the enterprising invader is to secure a respectable amount of marijuana, cocaine, and heroine, available at most gasoline stations, bars, movie theaters, churches, and Taco stands in Northern Mexico.

Then one must scamper across the border into the U.S. at a location where one is most likely to be spotted by Border Patrol agents.

When spotted by Border Patrol, make an immediate U-turn and started running back towards Mexico.

At that point, because they are racist pigs, the Border Patrol will chase you and most probably shoot you in the butt.

Do not panic, senor: : Your ship has finally come in!

After the Border Patrol has arrested you, you will be allowed one call.

Use this call wisely by contacting the nearest ACLU office. Tell them you are an illegal alien from Mexico who was shot in the ass by the Border Patrol on the American side of the border.

To assure immediate action, mention that you were shot while smuggling illegal drugs into the U.S.

Within 10 minutes or sooner, an ACLU lawyer will arrive at your cell and immediately start working on your behalf by text messaging Homeland Security guru Janet Napolitano to inform her of your awful plight.

Before you are actually booked, the Napolitano goons, in concert with the ACLU, will bail you out and cause the police to arrest all of the offending Border Patrol agents to take your place.

You will then receive immunity from all crimes in exchange for your testimony against the criminals, those punks who until two hours ago were Border Patrol agents.

Early next morning, your ACLU lawyers will visit you in your executive suite at the finest hotel in town, to sign documents needed to sue the former Border Patrol agents, the U.S. government, and all conservative radio talk show hosts and right wing columnists.

Provided the ACLU can find the right leftist judge and a rigged jury, you, the illegal alien, could look forward to receiving up to a five million-dollar judgment for your travails.

This is nearly what one might have hauled in by selling all those drugs!

What's that? You fear being arrested by racists and bigots in Arizona law enforcement?

Chill out, senor-dude!

Remember, you are a good hearted, hard working, fellow who just came here to do work that Americans, including blacks, will not do!

You are part of a protected class; a man to whom the rule of law does not apply.

Welcome to America!

29.4.10

How Do You Say, “Adios, Amnesty!” in Spanish?

By John W. Lillpop

It had to happen sooner or later.

President Barack Obama, sporting a media-created sky-high IQ, wisdom born of repeated failure, and dismal approval ratings, just had to get one right.

Sheer mathematical probability makes it extremely unlikely that even one as radical and consistently misguided as Obama would go on forever without bumbling his way into a policy decision that makes sense and is good for the American people.

Obama’s moment of truth came to him in an ephinany which revealed the foolishness of pushing a program of amnesty for 12-30 million invading aliens while unemployment continues to make mince meat out of the American Dream for citizens.

As reported, in part, at foxnews.com:

“WASHINGTON – Immigration reform has become the first of President Barack Obama's major priorities dropped from the agenda of an election-year Congress facing voter disillusionment. Sounding the death knell was Obama himself.

“The president noted that lawmakers may lack the "appetite" to take on immigration while many of them are up for re-election and while another big legislative issue — climate change — is already on their plate.
In a mind-boggling bit of silly spin, the president added this dilly:

"I don't want us to do something just for the sake of politics that doesn't solve the problem."


Golly, gee, Mr. President, can you name a single action that you have taken while in office that has been based on principle, rather than raw partisan posturing?

Is it not true that political expediency was behind health care reform, the public crucifixion of Wall Street, and the idiotic plans to close GITMO and try terrorists in New York City?

Still, abandoning amnesty is good for America, and I salute the president for his cowardice and back pedaling on an issue that the American people simply do not support.

In another flash of great news, it is reported that SB 1070 is causing illegal aliens to leave Arizona. That was and is the point of Governor Brewer’s courageous stand for America, right?

As reported at myway.com, in part: (1)

“PHOENIX (AP) - Many of the cars that once stopped in the Home Depot parking lot to pick up day laborers to hang drywall or do landscaping now just drive on by.

“Arizona's sweeping immigration bill allows police to arrest illegal immigrant day laborers seeking work on the street or anyone trying to hire them. It won't take effect until summer but it is already having an effect on the state's underground economy.

"Nobody wants to pick us up," Julio Loyola Diaz says in Spanish as he and dozens of other men wait under the shade of palo verde trees and lean against a low brick wall outside the east Phoenix home improvement store.

“Many day laborers like Diaz say they will leave Arizona because of the law, which also makes it a state crime to be in the U.S. illegally and directs police to question people about their immigration status if there is reason to suspect they are illegal immigrants.
“Supporters of the law hope it creates jobs for thousands of Americans."


Amazing, is it not, Mr. President what enforcement of the rule of law can achieve?

Perhaps it (enforcement) should be something to consider at the federal level, sir?


(1)
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100429/D9FCDCN00.html

United Nations—Good for Women?


















By John W. Lillpop

To those who regard Islam as a “great religion” and others who believe Islam to be a “Religion of Peace,” AND to those who simultaneously regard the United Nations as a force for good: Listen up!

Your beloved United Nations has decided to elect Iran to the Commission on the Status of Women.

Iran, the Islamic Republic that punishes immodest women by sticking them in a ditch and stoning said women to death.

As reported at foxnews, in part: (1)

“Without fanfare, the United Nations this week elected Iran to its Commission on the Status of Women, handing a four-year seat on the influential human rights body to a theocratic state in which stoning is enshrined in law and lashings are required for women judged "immodest."

“Just days after Iran abandoned a high-profile bid for a seat on the U.N. Human Rights Council, it began a covert campaign to claim a seat on the Commission on the Status of Women, which is "dedicated exclusively to gender equality and advancement of women."

“Buried 2,000 words deep in a U.N. press release distributed Wednesday on the filling of "vacancies in subsidiary bodies," was the stark announcement: Iran, along with representatives from 10 other nations, was "elected by acclamation," meaning that no open vote was requested or required by any member states — including the United States.”


It is nothing short of scandal that the United States did nothing to prevent the UN from teaming up with a culture that regards women as worthless waste to be disposed for even the slighest appearance of wrong doing!

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/04/29/elects-iran-commission-womens-rights/

Open Letter to Jeb Bush Regarding SB 1070

Jeb Bush
Florida

Dear Governor Bush,

With all due respect, sir, your recent statement against Arizona’s SB 1070 seems somewhat misguided.

As you are perfectly aware, your brother, President George W. Bush, had eight years in which to deal effectively with our porous borders and the flood of illegal aliens into America.

Unfortunately, President Bush did not live up to his Constitutional responsibility with respect to upholding the rule of law. As a consequence, during his term the number of illegal aliens in America increased dramatically.

Even worse, this invasion across our southern borders came during a time of war. Indeed, our borders should have been sealed on September 12, 2001, and should have remained sealed.

Instead, your brother spent his energies insisting on Comprehensive Immigration Reform, a regrettable euphemism for amnesty.

President George W. Bush had the political power to shut down the borders and remove illegal aliens through deportation. By doing so, this divisive and potentially lethal issue could have been resolved during your brother’s watch.

However, President George W. Bush simply did not have the political will to do the right thing. America citizens are now paying for his neglect.

We understand that the Bush family has important ties to the Mexican people, including your marriage to a woman born in Mexico.

However, the interests of the American people must be our greatest priority. Pandering to millions of invading criminals through amnesty will only serve to lure millions more across the border.

That is not in the best interests of America and her citizens.

Respectfully,

By John W. Lillpop
San Jose, Ca

“Major Human Rights Crisis,” Confronts Illegal Aliens In Mexico!

By John W. Lillpop

While moon bats in San Francisco and other liberal-infested sanctuary cities protest Arizona’s scandalous abuse of illegal aliens vis-à-vis SB 1070, it turns out that being asked to prove one’s immigration status is a really a minor inconvenience.

Compared, that is, to the possibility of being kidnapped, raped, or killed, fates that can befall the unsuspecting Latino illegal alien who gets caught in Mexico.

Mexico’s despicable treatment of Latino illegal aliens is s called a “major human rights crisis” by Amnesty International.

As reported, in part, at yahoo.news, (1):

“MEXICO CITY – Amnesty International called the abuse of migrants in Mexico a major human rights crisis Wednesday, and accused some officials of turning a blind eye or even participating in the kidnapping, rape and murder of migrants.

“The group's report comes at a sensitive time for Mexico, which is protesting the passage of a law in Arizona that criminalizes undocumented migrants.

“Rupert Knox, Amnesty's Mexico researcher, said in the report that the failure by authorities to tackle abuses against migrants has made their trip through Mexico one of the most dangerous in the world.

"Migrants in Mexico are facing a major human rights crisis leaving them with virtually no access to justice, fearing reprisals and deportation if they complain of abuses," Knox said

“Central American migrants are frequently pulled off trains, kidnapped en masse, held at gang hideouts and forced to call relatives in the U.S. to pay off the kidnappers. Such kidnappings affect thousands of migrants each year in Mexico, the report says.

“Many are beaten, raped or killed in the process.

“One of the main issues, Amnesty says, is that migrants fear they will be deported if they complain to Mexican authorities about abuses.

“At present, Article 67 of Mexico's Population Law says, "Authorities, whether federal, state or municipal ... are required to demand that foreigners prove their legal presence in the country, before attending to any issues."

“The Interior Department said the government has taken some steps to combat abuses and Mexico's legislature is working to repeal Article 67 "so that no one can deny or restrict foreigners' access to justice and human rights, whatever their migratory status."

“The Amnesty report said one female migrant told researchers that Mexican federal police had forced her group off a train and stolen their belongings. Forced to walk, she said, she was subsequently attacked by a gang and raped.”


So while millions of illegal aliens take to the streets of America to DEMAND rights to which they are not entitled, and do so with the encouragement and blessings of Marxist extremists like President Obama and Harry Reid, aliens caught in Mexico are lucky if they are able to get out of this third-work failed state alive!

A clarion call needs to be sounded to the likes of La Reza and other bleeding heart lefties: If you are genuinely concerned about mistreatment of Latino aliens, forget about conditions in America.

Focus instead on Mexico, home to a “major human rights crisis,” that imperils the lives and dignity of Latino travelers, those innocent invaders simply in search of a better life.

(1)http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100429/ap_on_re_la_am_ca/lt_mexico_migrants_1

28.4.10

California Had Solution to Illegal Problem Sixteen Years Ago!

By John W. Lillpop

In 1994, California’s voters were asked to vote on Proposition 187, a measure to cut off public services to several million illegal aliens who had invaded the state by illegally crossing our southern borders, bringing with them widespread economic, social, medical, and cultural devastation.

The good, enlightened people of California eagerly embraced Proposition 187 and approved the measure by a margin of nearly 2-1.

However, a liberal activist judge, convinced that she knew better than nearly 60 percent of the electorate, issued an injunction which blocked implementation pending an appeal by California.

California, governed at the time by conservative Pete Wilson, was working on an appeal; many legal professionals believed that California would prevail in a show down before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Unfortunately, in 1999 liberal governor Gray Davis violated a campaign promise by dropping California’s appeal altogether.

Davis did so, because, in his words, 187 was “too divisive.”

Four years later, the people of California again showed their mettle and discretion by kicking Gray Davis out of Sacramento in a historic recall election.

Sixteen years later, illegal immigration has spread all across the nation leading to the wasteful expenditure of hundreds of billions of dollars a year, reintroduction of diseases long ago eradicated in America; out of control identify theft, voter fraud, and other results deleterious to the best interests of American citizens.


If only America has listened to California sixteen years ago, illegal immigration would have been solved and America would not be saddled with the horrendous problems associated with feeding, housing, educating, incarcerating, and providing medical care to aliens who should not even be here.

Perhaps its time for a national law, a morphing of 187 and Arizona’s SB 1070, to prevent the complete destruction of America by third-world criminals?

27.4.10

Pop Quiz on SB 1070 and Illegal Immigration





























Satire by John W. Lillpop

Arizona’s tough new anti-illegal alien law is causing quite a row from coast-to-coast, and beyond. In the interest of bringing a smidgen of tolerance and calm to the chaos, this pop quiz has been prepared to set the record straight with respect to the perplexing legal, social, and moral questions surrounding illegal aliens.

The quiz:


1. SB 1070 is un-American and unfair because:

( ) Illegal aliens, the nation of Mexico, and the city of San Francisco are unanimously opposed;

( ) Invading criminals, despite their many faults, are human beings and deserve to live wherever they want, without government interference;

( ) It pisses off former Arizona Governor Janet Napolitano no end.


2. President Obama said the following about SB 1070:

( ) SB 1070 creates a surplus in the Border Security budget and may cause several thousand border patrol agents to be laid off;

( ) This means that Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor will not be welcome in Arizona, a real loss for the good people of Arizona;

( ) Illegal immigration is yet another inherited mess from W.;

( ) Dealing with illegal aliens is above “my pay grade.”


3. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) has had a dramatic switch in his thinking and now opposes immigration reform because:

( ) Most Hispanics hate gays;

( ) Graham wants a few hundred billion dollars for his South Carolina constituents and holding the Obama administration hostage on immigration reform could be a bonanza like it was for Senators Nelson and Landrieu on health care;

( ) It’s more “macho,” in a wretched world where one’s manliness is under constant scrutiny.


4. Janet Napolitano, former governor of Arizona:

( ) Was for Illegal Immigration before she was against it;

( ) Was a “stealth” candidate in Mexico’s presidential election in early July of 2006.

( ) Thinks ''Minutemen'' is a reference to the sexual staying power of Border Patrol agents.

5. Illegal aliens are:

( ) Desperately needed by liberals to win elections;

( ) A misnomer: They are actually Undocumented Democrats;

( ) Mexico’s chief export.


6. Arizona law enforcement officials have been instructed to use which criteria to determine if an individual should be arrested on suspicion of being illegal:

( ) Drives a low-riding Chevy with a “Che Guerva Rocks” sticker on his bumper;

( ) Is too dark to be here legally;

( ) Speaks only guttural Spanish;

( ) Has an “Obama-Biden” sticker taped to the fore head of his mule.


There you go--now you are informed and ready to educate the rest of the world as to the decency and fairness of SB 1070.

SB 1070 Already Paying Dividends in Arizona!

By John W. Lillpop

Contrary to the ominous warnings issued by naysayers and others who are opposed to the rule of law, Arizona’s freshly minted SB 1070 is already paying dividends.

As reported, in part, at the Washington Post (1), the government of Mexico has actually issued a travel advisory concerning travel to Arizona:

“MEXICO CITY – Mexico’s government is warning its citizens about travel to Arizona because of a tough new immigration law there.

“The travel alert from the Foreign Relations Department urges Mexicans in Arizona to ‘act with prudence and respect the framework of local laws.’


“It says that the law's passage shows ‘an adverse political atmosphere for migrant communities and for all Mexican visitors.’”

Hooray for SB 1070!

Until now, the Mexican government has done next to nothing to discourage illegal crossings into America by Latinos smitten with wanderlust in a northerly direction.

Of course the advisory does not specifically discourage illegal entry, but by encouraging Mexicans to ‘act with prudence and respect the framework of local laws,’ the implication is clear and profound.

It is also quite historic because the Mexican government appears to be acting responsibly for a change.

If further proof is needed to substantiate the correctness, logic and importance of SB 1070, this news item from good old San Francisco should do the trick.

As reported, in part, at nbcbayarea.com (1):

“Arizona's new anti-illegal immigration law is sparking outrage across the country and now, San Francisco's city attorney is urging policymakers and businesses to take a stand against the controversial legislation and send the state a message.

“San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera on Monday called for a sweeping boycott of the state of Arizona and Arizona-based businesses.”


Can there be a more convincing argument as to the soundness of any policy or law than repudiation of said policy or law by the city of San Francisco, moon bat capitol of the world?

With Mexico and San Francisco joined at the hip in opposition to SB 1070, the future for this common sense law appears very bright, indeed!


(1)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/04/27/AR2010042701544.html

(2) http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/politics/SF-Supe-Calls-for-Arizona-Boycott-92095669.html

Goldman Sachs Fraud: Obama Is Partially to Blame!

By John W. Lillpop

President Obama and Democrats in Congress are trying to use the Goldman Sachs fraud allegations as evidence of Wall Street greed in order to justify the president’s call for another layer of anti-business regulation, an effort that failed the first trial vote in the U.S. Senate on Monday night.

Leftists are also counting on the Goldman Sachs fraud case as a “wedge” issue to distract attention from the ObamaCare fiasco, Obama’s failure to improve unemployment despite the trillion dollar stimulus bill, the out-of-control federal deficit, foreign policy failures, and the attempt to replace free-market capitalism with socialism.

Desperate Democrats are scrambling like drowning rats to latch on to a populist theme that will spare their jobs when the tsunami of voter anger floods across our great nation on November 2.

In their partisan scheming, Democrats are counting on anti-Wall Street anger to out poll anti-government rage.

An outbreak of voter memory loss is also a critical part of the Obama campaign election strategy for this fall.

However, observant voters will recall that President Obama was a key player in the bail out of financial institutions.

It was he who cried wolf and warned that there was no time to study and review before sending hundreds of billions to firms the president now refers to as greedy purveyors of fraud and corruption.

It was President Obama who cautioned against too much caution, lest the American economy collapse like a flimsily-stacked deck of cards.

It was President Obama who saw the bail out as the only way to avoid a devastating depression.

And it is President Obama who has repeatedly taken credit for “saving” the economy with his economic policies, including the ill-advised bail outs.

Perhaps the fraud planned by Goldman Sachs could have been nipped in the bud if only Obama and his administration had refused to send out all of that taxpayer money without a comprehensive understanding of the facts?

After all, many did advise caution, sir.

Come November 2, the American people will deliver the only verdict that really matters.

In the war between the anti-Wall Street and anti-government crowds, who will prevail in November? Those who realize that the Goldman Sachs fraud scheme would not have worked if President Obama had not been complicit will vote from the anti-government perspective.

If enough thinking voters show up on November 2, America may be saved from the irrational wave of Obamamania that was once so prominent.

26.4.10

What about Voter Intimidation by Black Panthers, Mr. President?

By John W. Lillpop

With each passing day, it appears as though President Barack Obama is on a mission to divide America along racial and economic lines.

The administration seems bent on legislating one set of rules and perks for people of color, including anemic whites, and a package of higher taxes, restricted freedoms, and government scrutiny for Caucasians.

Is this not race-based fascism at its evil worse?

Evidence of this evil CHANGE is abundant in the president’s reaction to Arizona’s SB 1070, the law that deals with illegal aliens.

The law made necessary because of President Obama’s refusal to uphold the rule of law and enforce U.S. borders.

The law made necessary because President Obama is more concerned about people of color that happen to be in America illegally than he is about citizens.

SB 1070 would not be ripping the nation apart today if Obama (and his Republican predecessor) would enforce the law and defend the American people from invasion by foreign interlopers.

Instead, this president is prepared to unleash the resources of the United States against Arizona based on trumped up civil rights violations.

Arizona did what any state with intelligent leadership would do: It took action to defend Arizona citizens from illegal aliens, regardless of race.

What’s that you ask? Surely, SB 1070 targets Hispanics, Mexicans, and Latinos, right?

Actually none of those words are found any where in the bill, the short title to which is “Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act.”

Doubt the veracity of that statement? Down load SB 1070 and search the document for Mexican, Latinos, and Hispanics.

You will get a message that the terms are not found in SB 1070. Nada.

While there, read SB 1070 and see if it sounds oppressive or racist.

So the question is: Who in their right mind would oppose law enforcement and safe neighborhoods?

Answer: President Obama and Marxist politicians, with all due apologies to the term “in their right minds.”

While Obama, Al Sharpton, and millions of illegal aliens stew in the juices of a melting pot gone amok, a real civil rights issue is ignored by this president and his administration.

Specifically, as reported, in part, by wsj.com (reference 1) the New Black Panthers party was apparently involved in the serious business of voter intimidation on November 4, 2008 when Barack Obama was elected:

“President Obama's Justice Department continues to stonewall inquiries about why it dropped a voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party.

“The episode—which Bartle Bull, a former civil rights lawyer and publisher of the left-wing Village Voice, calls "the most blatant form of voter intimidation I've ever seen"—began on Election Day 2008. Mr. Bull and others witnessed two Black Panthers in paramilitary garb at a polling place near downtown Philadelphia.”

“One of them, they say, brandished a nightstick at the entrance and pointed it at voters and both made racial threats. Mr. Bull says he heard one yell "You are about to be ruled by the black man, cracker!"


How is that a law which seeks to deal effectively with foreign illegal aliens is racist and unfair, while intimidation of citizens by New Black Panther members is ignored by President Obama?

Might it have to do with racism and bigotry—from people of color and the Left, sir?

(1) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203550604574361071968458430.html

25.4.10

Who Needs Arizona’s Law or Obama's Reform? Instead, Adopt Mexico’s Immigration Law!

By John W. Lillpop

SB 1070, Arizona’s citizen-friendly, illegal-alien hostile, bill has ruffled quite a few feathers, including those who occupy high places in government in Washington, D.C.

As an objective an unbiased observer, I have concluded that we should scrap SB 1070 as well as all of Obama’s fantasies about immigration reform.

We can do that and solve our illegal alien crisis in one fell swoop by taking one simple: Implement Mexico’s immigration laws in America!


Mexico, according to journalist and terrorist expert Dr. J. Michael Waller, has some of the strictest immigration laws of any country, and they enforce them to the letter.

A link to his commentary.
http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/waller5-8-06.html

Waller informs us that "Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for the U.S. Congress to adopt the Marxist immigration reform bill."

Waller adds: "That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue.

Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico."

Waller sharpens his point by commenting on the unnerving tendency of some legal scholars in the U.S. to use foreign laws as a reference point for deciding issues in America.

Waller states, "At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem."

And whereas U.S. laws are often cumbersome, complex instruments fathomable only to lawyers who charge upwards of $300 an hour, things are more to the point in Mexican law.

Again, quoting Waller from the referenced link: "Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:

• In Mexico legally;

• Have the means to sustain themselves economically;

• Not destined to be burdens on society;

• Of economic and social benefit to society;

• Of good character and have no criminal records; and

• Contributors to the general well being of the nation.


"The law also ensures that:

• Authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;

• Foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;

• Foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;

• Foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;

• Foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;

• Those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison."


Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense," Waller states with unassailable logic.

Unfortunately, very little "perfect sense" is obvious in the ongoing debate on immigration reform here in the United States. Rather, the interests of the American people are often ignored or made subordinate by politicians from both parties.

Of greater interest to some in Washington, D.C., is feeding an insatiable corporate appetite for cheap labor, satisfying a wicked lust for cheap votes, and giving in to an inexplicable drive to promote America's decay into a third-world abyss.

These ignoble interests trump rule of law, homeland security, economic and social stability, and preservation of American language and culture in the minds of some elected officials sworn to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.

By contrast, Waller notes that Mexican law and officials are focused on numero uno--that being Mexico!

Waller writes, "The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens – and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, both illegal and illegal.

"Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or General Law on Population spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.

"It is an interesting law – and one that should cause us all to ask, 'Why is our southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent?'

"If a felony is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.

"If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce them as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry."

Waller supports his main thesis by citing key articles of Mexico's main
law.

Again quoting from the commentary at http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/waller5-8-06.html:

"We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.

"Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:

• Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of
contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)

• Immigration officials must 'ensure' that 'immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance' and for their dependents. (Article 34)

• Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets 'the
equilibrium of the national demographics,' when foreigners are deemed
detrimental to 'economic or national interests,' when they do not behave like
good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and
when 'they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.' (Article 37)

• The Secretary of Governance may 'suspend or prohibit the admission of
foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.' (Article 38)

• Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:

• Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration
authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article
73)

• A National Population Registry keeps track of 'every single individual who
comprises the population of the country,' and verifies each individual’s identity.
(Articles 85 and 86)

• A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:

• Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article
116)

• Foreigners who sign government documents 'with a signature that is false or
different from that which he normally uses' are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:

• Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)

• Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)

• Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico – such as working with out a permit – can also be imprisoned.

• Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,

• A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five
thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country
illegally. (Article 123)

• Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico
instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)

• Foreigners who 'attempt against national sovereignty or security' will be
deported. (Article 126)

• Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered
criminals under the law.

• A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the
foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)

• Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)"


Waller summarizes his review of Mexican law with this statement: "All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration preaching is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States."

Waller concludes his excellent work with a challenge that should be visited upon all 535 members of the U.S. Congress and President Obama as they consider immigration reform.

Waller's challenge:

"Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy.

Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model."

Congratulations to J. Michael Waller.* His is a voice of sanity that needs to be heard, especially by inmates wandering the halls and cloak rooms of Capitol Hill and 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

*J. Michael Waller is vice president for Information Operations at the Center for Security Policy. A journalist and author, he brings expertise in terrorism, intelligence, the former Soviet Union, and the Americas. He previously served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of State.

Finding Humor in Arizona's Tough New Immigration Law

Satire by John W. Lillpop

Somebody famous once said: "Laughter is the best medicine."

That being the case, Dr. Lillpop offers the following prescription to those suffering hot flashes and Latino rage in response to Arizona's tough new common-sense immigration law, fondly known as SB 1070.

This medicine is to be taken with potable water(clean and American) by Latinos who are good hearted and hard working, but nonetheless IWB (Invading while Brown).

The good Dr. Lillpop's prescription:

1. Do not join marches where the Mexican flag is the only flag allowed and where angry Latinos carry banners, written in profanity-laced Spanish, to “demand” equal rights for illegal aliens;

2. Remember: Cinco de Mayo is a Mexican holiday, which can be celebrated freely and openly---in Mexico, if you must.

3. Avoid emergency rooms, except in rare instances of actual life and death emergencies, and then only if no other options are available;

4. Refuse any and all offers of employment in fast food restaurants, car washes, farms where fruits and vegetables are picked, any position that requires the use of an obtrusive leaf blower, and housekeeping;

5. Do not demand that your Miranda rights be read to you in Spanish;

6. Under no circumstance should more than one identity be used when applying for any form of public assistance intended solely for citizens;

7. Learn to enjoy (or pretend to enjoy) hot dogs, apple pie, and baseball over tacos, refried beans, and gambling on dog fights;

8. Do not request Spanish-language absentee ballots until you have been paid in advance for doing so by a local branch of the DNC;

9. Avoid identifying yourself with un-American- sounding long names like Juan Pedro Luis Sanchez Gonzales Garcia Ramirez Rodriquez Chavez Reyes, even if each name is registered as a different voter with the Democrat party.

Above all else, hold you head high and remember this important fact: Not all Hispanics in America are here illegally; it just seems that way to grouchy, old white geezers!

Amnesty: Carrot or Stick?

By John W. Lillpop


According to progressive thought, as articulated by President Obama, High Priest of Liberal Logic, the “solution” to illegal aliens is really quite elementary: Grant all 12 million or so amnesty.

By doing just that, there would no longer be any illegal aliens to deal with, at least according to the best and brightest liberal minds.

Technically speaking, the left is right: Make that, which is currently illegal, legal and you have fixed the problem.

At least until the next wave of 12 million heads north with the glory of amnesty on their minds!

Another amnesty bail out would include an added bonus for progressives: Democrat party rolls would be replenished with millions of grateful voters for decades.

Mind you, that political reality has absolutely nothing to do with the universal support for amnesty among Democrat politicians.

Wink, wink!

However, does anyone remember that America dabbled in amnesty in 1986 with the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA)?

President Reagan signed IRCA into law based on the promise that it would solve the illegal immigration problem, once and for all.

The IRCA “fix” granted amnesty to 3-4 million illegal aliens.

Significantly, it also mandated that the government take actions against employers who hire illegal aliens, and against illegal aliens themselves.

The later is called deportation, an old English term hardly ever used in modern America, except to identify bigoted racists, tea party nut balls, and right-wing terrorists.

Unfortunately, instead of ending illegal migration as intended, the amnesty set forth in IRCA has attracted at least an additional 12 million illegal aliens, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars a year to taxpayers.

Given the liberal obsession with trillion dollar “solutions” these days, hundreds of billions seems but a mere pittance, a small price to pay for the allegiance of millions of future Democrats.

Nonetheless, it is obvious that the amnesty of 1986 has been more of a carrot than a stick to scores of millions of people living south of our borders.

The tragic fact is that the federal government, under both Democrat and Republican administrations, has blatantly refused to enforce those provisions of IRCA designed to prevent and reverse illegal immigration.

This political malpractice has been the norm, even during time of war!

Remember 9/11? That grim day in American history should have caused our government to seal off the borders permanently.

Instead, government has done nothing to control our borders even as Mexico continues to decline into a failed state of violence where drug cartels appear smarter and stronger than Felipe Calderon and his corrupt Mexican government.

Adding to our misery is this awful truth: America is now controlled by a president who recently CUT the border security budget and by a “progressive” Secretary of Homeland Security who regards illegal aliens as “newly arrived refugees,”

Those who really care about America need to remember those facts when considering yet another amnesty bail out!



24.4.10

What If “Obama-Logic” Applied to Bank Robberies?























By John W. Lillpop


According to logic gleaned by President Obama, apparently from the Kenyan School of High Finance and Global Economics, the “solution” to illegal aliens is really quite simple: Grant all 20 million of the invaders complete and unconditional amnesty.

Just like that there would no longer be any pesky illegal aliens to deal with, and the Democrat party voter rolls would be replenished with 20 million illiterate, non-English speaking peasants.

It would be brown magic by a black magician, if you will.

The only question: Does America really need another 20 million leaf-blower operators and McDonald’s burger and fries all stars?

Oh, and does anyone remember that we tried this amnesty idiocy in 1986 with the Immigration Reform and Control Act?

Given the fact that 20 million have invaded America since the failed “reform” of 1986, why in the world should the American people believe that Obama’s scheme will not cause another 20 million Mexicans to jump the fence and head north?

Owing to the fact that illegal immigration is the moral equivalent of bank robbery, what would happen if Obama’s warped logic were applied to convicted bank robbers?

To begin with, the president would issue an Executive Order to pardon all convicted bank robbers of any and all crimes. Their voting rights would be reinstated, and their records expunged to delete all crimes.

Next, Democrat party moon bats would rush to register all former bank robbers as Democrats in time for the 2010 mid-term elections.

What then? Would this gracious outpouring of empathy turn hardened criminals into choir boys and flower arrangers? Would bank robberies cease to exist because of the love and gratitude owed President Obama?

Of course, bank robbers are not exactly the same as illegal aliens.

For instance, most bank robbers are citizens and nearly all speak English.

Other than that, there is damn little difference between a bloke who holds up a bank and the knot head that jumps the fence at the border and heads for the nearest welfare and food stamp outlet.

The solution: Deport them ALL, bank robbers and illegal aliens, to Mexico. Give Felipe Calderon a taste of his own vile medicine!

Open Letter to Governor Jan Brewer: Thank You for Approving SB 1070

April 24, 2010

The Honorable Jan Brewer
Governor of Arizona
1700 West Washington
Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Dear Governor Brewer,

Congratulations on your wise and decisive action in approving SB 1070.

Millions of American citizens throughout our great nation are grateful to you for doing the right thing, despite intense political pressure to do otherwise, including unhelpful input from our “misguided” president.

For their part, Arizonians can take enormous pride in the fact that have they elected a governor who is unwavering in her commitment to defending the lives and property of Arizona citizens.

With enough dedicated patriots like you standing up for what is right, come November 2 we will take America back from politicians more concerned with raw partisan power than with the well being of the citizenry.

God Bless you, Governor Brewer.


Sincerely,

John W. Lillpop
San Jose, California

Strategies for Coping with Arizona’s Tough New Immigration Law













Satire by John W. Lillpop

Hispanics living in Arizona are being pushed to the brink of hysteria by a deliberate campaign of fear-mongering, disinformation, racial intimidation, and hate speech waged against the state’s tough new common-sense immigration law, fondly known as SB 1070.

Unfortunately, Hispanic angst is being exploited by the Obama administration, including the president himself, other reckless Marxists in the U.S. Congress, radical extremist groups like La Reza, and by the government of Mexico.

However, the fact of the matter is that law-abiding Hispanic citizens have absolutely nothing to fear.

This law, and others sure to come, concern only illegal migrants regardless of ethnicity or race.

In other words, being Hispanic is irrelevant in and of itself, except for the dreary fact that the overwhelming majority of illegal aliens currently here are Hispanic.

In the interest of making the transition from Napolitano-era fascism to the American rule of law as seamless as possible, it is imperative that non-Hispanics understand and accept that Arizona’s new law is understandably frightening to many Latinos, especially those here illegally.

Still, the good news for Hispanics is that there are several common sense measures that can be taken to minimize one’s vulnerability to being caught in the vicious vice known as the American system of jurisprudence.

Herewith, then, are nine empowering strategies for avoiding confrontations with bigoted racists disguised as Arizona law enforcement officials.

These strategies are highly recommended for Latinos who are good hearted and hard working, but nonetheless IWB (Invading while Brown).

The IWB imperatives:

1. Do not join marches where the Mexican flag is the only flag allowed and where angry Latinos carry banners, written in profanity-laced Spanish, to “demand” equal rights for illegal aliens;

2. Remember: Cinco de Mayo is a Mexican holiday, which can be celebrated freely and openly---in Mexico, if you must.

3. Avoid emergency rooms, except in rare instances of actual life and death emergencies, and then only if no other options are available;

4. Refuse any and all offers of employment in fast food restaurants, car washes, farms where fruits and vegetables are picked, any position that requires the use of an obtrusive leaf blower, and housekeeping;

5. Do not demand that your Miranda rights be read to you in Spanish;

6. Under no circumstance should more than one identity be used when applying for any form of public assistance intended solely for citizens;

7. Learn to enjoy (or pretend to enjoy) hot dogs, apple pie, and baseball over tacos, refried beans, and gambling on dog fights;

8. Do not request Spanish-language absentee ballots until you have been paid in advance for doing so by a local branch of the DNC;

9. Avoid identifying yourself with un-American- sounding long names like Juan Pedro Luis Sanchez Gonzales Garcia Ramirez Rodriquez Chavez Reyes, even if each name is registered as a different voter with the Democrat party.

Above all else, hold you head high and remember this important fact: Not all Hispanics in America are here illegally; it just seems that way to grouchy, old white geezers!

23.4.10

Barack Obama’s Distorted “Notions of Fairness”

By John W. Lillpop


Immediately after Governor Jan Brewer upheld her obligation to the citizens of Arizona by signing SB 1070, President Obama, whose blatant refusal to secure U.S. borders contributed heavily to the passage of this bill, polluted the air waves with an angry outburst not dissimilar from an eruption of an Iceland volcano.

In typical Obama-speak, the president was divisive, inflammatory and darn right goofy.

As reported, in part, at Bloomberg, Obama said:

“The actions by the Arizona legislature threaten “to undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans,” Obama said. It also may hamper trust between residents and law enforcement authorities, he said.

“He said he has instructed U.S. authorities to monitor the state’s actions and to “examine the civil rights and other implications” of the legislation.”


Sorry, Mr. President, but the American people are fed up with your “notion of fairness” when it comes to most issues of the day, including the issue of illegal aliens.

Perhaps it escaped your notice, Mr. President, but two weeks ago an American citizen, Rob Krentz, was slaughtered on his own property in Arizona by a suspected illegal alien.

He was murdered as pay back because his brother had the audacity to report illegal aliens on the family property.

Does that meet your definition of fairness sir?


Many illegal aliens are also guilty of violating the borders and immigration laws of our sovereign nation, tax evasion, identity theft, voter fraud, stealing hundreds of billions of dollars each year in public services to which they are not entitled, not paying for medical services which forces hospitals and medical facilities into bankruptcy thereby denying American citizens the use of such facilities, taking millions of jobs that should be filled by Americans, contributing to the over crowding of public schools, reintroducing diseases long eradicated back into America, and degradation of American language and culture with third-world language and ways.

Is this more fairness from south of the border, President Obama?

Arizona is on U.S. soil and should be defended by the government, a responsibility that you have refused to accept since your morning of glory on January 20, 2009.

When American citizens are murdered on U.S. soil for defending their own property, the time has come for decisive and firm action, Mr. President.

Governor Brewer knew full well that you could not be counted on to defend citizens against illegal aliens. Her decision to sign SB 1070 was a wise and prudent choice, the likes of which are no longer obvious in your version of Washington, D.C.

By the way, given your concern about civil rights, how about some gentle, or not so gentle, prodding of Attorney General Erick Holder with regard to the case involving voter intimidation by members of the New Black Panther party on November 4, 2008?

That matter has genuine civil rights implications, Mr. President, because the alleged intimidations were committed against American citizens.

White citizens, but citizens all the same!

Finally, Obama’s commitment to expedite immigration reform because of the new law in Arizona is a dangerous sign that this president may be in the process of losing his grip and much more!

We have upwards of 20 million invading criminals in America, people who have no business being here. And our president wants to “solve” the problem by making illegal aliens legal?

That would be another example of “fairness” from a progressive mindset, right Mr. President?

Thanks, but no thanks. Do your job and enforce our borders and existing laws on the books, Mr. President.

That is both fair and constitutional, sir!

Victory in Arizona: God Bless Governor Jan Brewer!











By John W. Lillpop

Let the record show that on April 23, 2010, the Janet Napolitano era of partisan pandering to invading criminals was abruptly ended by an extraordinary act of courage and intelligence by a responsible American, Janet Brewer, Governor of Arizona.

As reported, in part, at Yahoo news (1):

"PHOENIX – Gov. Jan Brewer ignored criticism from President Barack Obama on Friday and signed into law a bill supporters said would take handcuffs off police in dealing with illegal immigration in Arizona, the nation's gateway for human and drug smugglers.

With hundreds of people surrounding the state Capitol, protesting that the bill would lead to civil rights abuses, Brewer said she wouldn't tolerate racial profiling. She said critics were "overreacting."

"We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," Brewer said after signing the law. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a dangerous and unacceptable situation."


Finally, the cycle of anti-American stupidity and corruption so prevalent during the Napolitano seizure of executive power in Arizona has ended-- with gusto.

Right thinking patriots can celebrate this victory for American citizens with enthusiasm and hope for the future.

Let's use this victory to spread the “Arizona solution” to all 50 states and ram this sort of thinking down the throats of Marxists like Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid!

Amnesty? Hell no!

Let’s demand closure of the borders and deportation of all illegal aliens now!

God Bless Governor Brewer!

(1) http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100423/ap_on_re_us/us_immigration_enforcement

Fixing Wall Street: Why Not Give Porn Filters a Chance, Mr. President?













By John W. Lillpop

Once again, President Obama is proposing a massive new layer of federal regulation that would grant even more power to inept and corrupt government bureaucracies, the ones that exist solely to obstruct private enterprise.

At issue is the so-called Wall Street reform legislation that is being considered in the hallowed halls of Congress with considerable prodding from the naïve community organizer now occupying the Oval Office.

As reported at cnn.money.com, in part (1) Obama said the following:

"I believe in the power of the free market," Obama said in a speech at Cooper Union, not far from the New York Stock Exchange. "But a free market was never meant to be a free license to take whatever you can get, however you can get it."

“Obama said the lesson of the recent financial crash, which sparked a deep recession that claimed over 8 million jobs, is that reform is needed to prevent repeating the mistakes of the past.

“Without reform, Obama said, "our house will continue to sit on shifting sands, leaving our families, businesses and the global economy vulnerable to future crises."


Of course, there is a remote chance that Obama is finally right about something after dismal failures on the economy, unemployment, health care, foreign policy and the federal deficit.

However, Obama is completely “misguided” about the type of reform that is needed to fix Wall Street.

Rather than deploying the Marxist hand of big government against entrepreneurs who actually work for a living, Obama would be better served by looking over the shoulders of sex-starved toads at the SEC who while away the hours surfing for porn.

Indeed, while SEC porn freaks use government computers and time to stimulate their carnal fantasies, bozos like Bernie Madoff execute Ponzi Schemes worth $50 billion dollars.

Come on, Mr. President!

Think outside the box of progressive “regulate and tax” dogma, which always results in calamity.

In terms so simple that even a community organizer from Kenya should be able to understand, why not give porn filters a chance?



(1)
http://money.cnn.com/2010/04/22/news/economy/Obama_Wall_Street_reform/index.htm?cnn=yes&hpt=Sbin

22.4.10

Forgotten Truth: Hillary Clinton Mother of 'Birther' Movement!


By John W. Lillpop




Nearly all liberals, as well as a few misguided conservatives, have sought to dismiss the "birther" movement as the product of right-wing retards barking up the wrong tree.

However, the entire issue of Barack Obama's eligibilty was first brought to the fore by lawyers acting on behalf of Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2008.

Specifically, Phil J. Berg, hardly a member of any vast right wing conspiracy, was an ardent supporter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, and her candiacy for the presidency.

Notwithstanding his liberal pedigree, Phil J. Berg was hot on the trail of one Barack Obama, because Berg wished to protect the American people from electing a non-citizen to the most powerful office in the world.

In August 2008, before Obama was officially nominated by the Democrat party, Mr. Berg filed a legal challenge to Obama's constitutional eligibility to occupy the Oval Office.

On October 23, Mr. Berg filed a Motion to Expedite Resolution of Berg V. Obama, summarized directly below:

" This motion argues that the facts have been established that Barack Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be elected or serve as President of the United States, and that the Court should issue a summary judgment as follows:

 That Barack Hussein Obama a/k/a Barry Hussein Obama a/k/a Barack Dunham a/k/a Barry Dunham a/k/a Barack Soetoro a/k/a Barry Soetoro is not a “natural born” or “naturalized” United States citizen.

 That he is ineligible to run for and/or serve as President of the United States.

 That the Democratic National Committee be enjoined from naming Barack Hussein Obama, et al as the Democratic Presidential Candidate on the ballot.

 That the Democratic National Committee and Barack Hussein Obama, et al are enjoined from any further campaigning on behalf of Barack Hussein Obama, et al for Office of the Presidency.

 That Barack Hussein Obama’s, et al name be
removed from any and all ballots for the Office of the President of the United States."

There you go! The inconvenient truth is as follows: Hillary Clinton is the mother of all birthers!

Open Letter to Arizona Governor Jan Brewer: Sign Arizona Bill SB 1070

April 22, 2010

The Honorable Jan Brewer
Governor of Arizona
1700 West Washington
Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Dear Governor Brewer,

For far too long now, the people of Arizona have been forced to go it alone in their righteous battle against the economic, cultural, and social devastation brought on by foreign invaders who cross the border illegally from Mexico into Arizona.

Border security and enforcement is, of course, a federal responsibility. That constitutional responsibility was, in large measure, ignored during eight years of the Bush administration and by your predecessor, Governor Janet Napolitano.

This dereliction of responsibility is even more severe now that Barack Obama is in power and Janet Napolitano is “serving” as Secretary of Homeland Security.

As you are aware, irresponsible and reckless inaction by the United States government lead directly to the recent slaughter of Arizona rancher Rob Krentz who was killed on his own property by a suspected illegal alien.

Mr. Krent’s cold-blooded murder was reportedly in retaliation against his brother who allegedly reported illegal alien crossings to federal authorities.

Governor Brewer, enough is enough!

When American citizens are murdered on U.S. soil for defending their own property, the time has come for decisive and firm action.

Ideally, the president would send a significant number of armed troops to the border to prevent further invasions, and to protect American citizens living in your great state.

Unfortunately, President Obama is more focused on growing the base of the Democrat party by granting amnesty to illegal aliens than he is in defending citizens.

Despite the flagrant disregard for Arizona and her citizens in Washington, D.C., Arizona state lawmakers recently passed SB 1070 which levels the playing field somewhat by giving law authorities in Arizona the power and authority to question and incarcerate those here illegally.

Admittedly, SB 1070 is not a complete solution because the federal government continues to work against the interests of Arizona’s citizens.

Nonetheless, SB 1070 is a vitally needed weapon in the hands of Arizona law enforcement authorities in their ongoing battle against invaders.

Arizona Senator John McCain, certainly no right wing zealot when it comes to illegal immigration, has endorsed SB 1070 and has advised you to sign the bill.

Moreover, a recent Rasmussen poll indicates that 70 percent of all Arizonans support SB 1070and want it signed into law.

The time has come to let illegal aliens and would be illegal aliens know that the Napolitano era of reckless and partisan pandering to invading criminals is over and done!

Accordingly, Governor Brewer, I respectfully request that you sign SB 1070 and set an example for all of America to follow.

Please sign the bill, governor, in memory of Rob Krentz.


Sincerely,


John W. Lillpop
San Jose, California

Send GITMO Terrorists to Alcatraz Island!








Satire by John W. Lillpop

As the Obama administration agonizes over where to try KSM and other terrorists, extremists on the far left are wringing their collective hands about what do with the sweet souls who have been victimized by the Bush-Cheney Jihad on Islamofascism.

According to the left, those GITMO dirt bags, the ones who would gladly slice your throat for proselytizing the Good News of Christianity, deserve to be treated no more harshly than a blind jay walker, with Alzheimer's who cannot remember the exact whereabouts of those elusive cross walks.

Given their druthers, President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and other nut balls on the left would ship GITMO thugs to the suburbs of Detroit and Chicago to dwell among sleeper cells where mosques, prayer blankets, and bowing east with one's butt straight up in the air five times a day is considered cool.

Or, as the Muslims say, Ah-La!


According to anonymous and unreliable sources, liberals have decided that sending terrorists to Alcatraz Island just off San Francisco may be a viable alternative because:

*GITMO dudes are already accustomed to living on a communist island. Thus, moving near San Francisco would be minimal "culture shock" for the killers.

*In the event prisoners were able to pull off an escape, only downtown San Francisco would be imperiled. No real American patriots would be in jeopardy.

*San Francisco's rigid voting statutes, which screen out Republicans and conservatives, could be revised to accommodate Islamofascists in order for said terrorists to vote as Democrats in the 2010 mid-term elections.

Reached at the San Francisco Zoo where she is on a voter registration campaign, Screecher Nancy Pelosi was quoted as saying, "I am not wild about this idea, unless Obama adds $500 billion to the next stimulus package to create jobs on Alcatraz!"

Nancy Pelosi: She may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer, but she is the goofiest!

21.4.10

The Renaissance of Prudence in Post-Napolitano Arizona





















By John W. Lillpop


Just a few days ago, Arizona made an impressive showing that convinced this reporter that the state had emerged stronger than ever after a prolonged bout with “Napolitano-crud,” a severe disease of the mind and soul brought about when decent people mistakenly allow a leftwing nut ball access to too much executive power.

The left wing nut ball is Janet Napolitano, with “too much” being the electorate’s foolish decision (twice) to vest the power of governor in this mindless cretin who is more of a Mexican mole than enforcer of American laws.

The good news is that Arizona earned some measure of redemption last week by passing the toughest law in America with respect to dealing with invading criminals from Mexico.

Folks, this is the type of immigration “reform” that America desperately needs.

Rather than looking for ways to pamper and cater to illegal aliens, Arizona has empowered law authorities to ask questions about immigration status and to arrest invaders, even though those who happen to be Hispanic.

Common sense, Part 1!

Adding to the post-Napolitano outburst of cerebral magnificence in the Grand Canyon State, the Arizona House voted to require America’s numero uno illegal alien to prove his eligibility for the presidency in the event that he attempts to steal another election in 2012.

Common sense, Part 2!

As reported at kpho.com, in part, (1):


“PHOENIX -- The Arizona House on Monday voted for a provision that would require President Barack Obama to show his birth certificate if he hopes to be on the state's ballot when he runs for reelection.

The House voted 31-22 to add the provision to a separate bill. The measure still faces a formal vote.

It would require U.S. presidential candidates who want to appear on the ballot in Arizona to submit documents proving they meet the constitutional requirements to be president.”


Hooray for Arizona. May all of America follow the lead of this state which has shown that common sense can be restored, once the infestation by liberal maggots has been eradicated!



(1)

http://www.kpho.com/news/23202195/detail.html

Message to Felipe Calderon: Keep Mexico's Grabage in Mexico!





























By John W. Lillpop



Mexican President Felipe Calderon is scheduled to visit America in May. He will no doubt waste his breath by lecturing Americans about how illegal aliens from his nation-sewer are being mistreated.

Like the equally demented Vicente Fox, Calderon stupidly argues that Americans should be grateful to have 20-38 million, mostly Mexican, illiterate peasants dumped in our laps, for US taxpayers to educate, feed, house, and provide medical care for.

At only $200 billion a year, it's quite a bargain, right Felipe?

Calderon is also taking a page from the Vicente Fox school of ignorance by declaring that American resistance to the invasion from south of our borders is an obvious case of racism!

What both Fox and Calderon conveniently forget to note is that illegal aliens come here on their own--no one is forcing these third-world free loaders and parasites to invade America!

Except, perhaps, the corrupt Mexican government!

Avoiding mistreatment of Mexican citizens in America is really quite simple, President Calderon.

Stop them from coming here to begin, with and take back the 38 million already here!

Repeat: Keep your damn garbage in Mexico and it will not be treated like garbage in America!

America does not need or want your castoffs.

Felipe Calderon, Vicente Fox, and all of the other corrupt thugs in the Mexican government must be forced to accept the following essential truths about America:


* In 1848, The Treaty of Guadeloupe Hidalgo was ratified by both the U.S. and Mexican Congresses. That Treaty ended any and all claims Mexico had to land now a part of the United States.

* Native American Indians were the original owners of the American southwest. Were there were any valid property rights claims concerning that land, such rights would belong to Native American Indians, not Mexicans.

* America is a sovereign nation, totally independent of Mexico. It has been that way for over 200 years. We intend to keep it that way.

* In America, Mexico is considered a foreign nation and Spanish is a foreign language.

* America operates according to the rule of law which applies to everyone. This is true whether one is brown, black, yellow, lily-white, red, or an exotic hybrid of lavender and green.

* Being hard-working and good hearted is commendable. But those qualities do NOT entitle anyone to enter America illegally.

* Being bilingual is cool--provided one of the languages is English. Literacy in only Spanish is not cool here.

* Celebrating one's cultural heritage is perfectly fine--as long as it does not interfere with prompt and complete assimilation into American culture.

* Driving while loaded or drunk may be "macho" in Mexico. But in America, it is considered stupid and criminal and is not tolerated, regardless of ones country of origin or cultural heritage.

* People here illegally are criminals, and as such, are most unwelcome. American citizens will fight to have such miscreants deported, regardless of whether or not families are involved. Illegal is illegal, family or not.

* Demanding that our borders be secured and that the law be enforced is the right of all American citizens and doing so does not make any one a racist or bigot.

* U.S. immigration laws exist to protect American citizens and others that are here legally, not to facilitate a foreigner's pursuit of a better life.

* Those who come to America must adjust to our culture and traditions. We have no obligation or desire to change in deference to foreign newcomers, and

* Brown may be beautiful in Mexico, but in America, we are partial to colors that symbolize freedom under the rule of law. That would be Red, White and Blue.

Take note of this list Messrs. Calderon and Fox. Share it with other Mexicans considering an invasion north.

Passing it on may cause them to reconsider, and that would be a great thing!

20.4.10

Perfect Cure for Allergy Discovered in Ohio!














Satire by John W. Lillpop


Serial rapist Darryl Durr and his gangsta lawyers thought they had uncovered a legal maneuver that would allow the killer to dance around the law and avoid justice.

As reported at Yahoo.com, in part (1):

“LUCASVILLE, Ohio – A serial rapist who strangled a 16-year-old girl in 1988 and who had argued he might be violently allergic to the state's execution drug was put to death Tuesday with no apparent complications.

“As the lethal injection began, Darryl Durr clenched his fists, grimaced and held his head up for about 10 seconds before gently putting it down. It wasn't clear if he was in pain or emotionally reacting to the moment.

“Durr, 46, was pronounced dead at 10:36 a.m. at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility in Lucasville.

"He was a monster," the victim's mother, Norma Jean Godsey, said after witnessing the execution.

“Durr kidnapped 16-year-old Angel Vincent from her home in Elyria on Jan. 31, 1988, while her mother and stepfather were away at a Super Bowl party, prosecutors said. He raped and strangled her with a dog chain and hid her body inside two orange traffic barrels placed end-to-end in a Cleveland park.

“In what appeared to be an unusual legal maneuver, Durr's lawyers said last week they uncovered evidence of Durr's anesthesia allergy in his 800-page prison medical record. Ohio uses a large dose of anesthesia to execute condemned inmates, and Durr argued that no one knew how his body would react to the drug.”


The most amazing part of this story is that Durr’s lawyers were reckless enough to bring up such an absurd argument.

After all, this sleaze bag was supposed to be put to death—why should anyone except a leftist moon bat concern themselves with how "his body would react to the drug"?

The good news is that justice was ultimately served and Ohio has made history with a miraculous cure for allergies!

Well done, Buckeye state!



1http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100420/ap_on_re_us/us_ohio_execution

Are you Mindless Enough to Be a Liberal?

By John W. Lillpop








With control of the U.S. government now in the hands of the enemy,
distraught conservatives are anxiously searching for answers.

What are the options? One can either move to Australia or
commit suicide. Some really desperate folks are even thinking
of becoming liberals!

To those undecided between suicide and becoming a liberal,
please consider the inconsistency and irrational thinking needed
to embrace the liberal agenda:

* Execution of a convicted killer is cruel, unusual & barbaric;
whereas a woman’s right to abort the life of an innocent child
is inalienable.

* Starving an innocent victim like Terri Schaivo to death is
acceptable; using lethal injection to end the life of a brutal killer is
not.

* Burning Old Glory is acceptable free speech, whereas
conservatives like Rush Limbaugh routinely engage in
unacceptable “hate speech.”

* Skyrocketing gasoline prices devastate working American
families,but protecting wild animals and obscure organisms is a greater
priority.

* Large profits are obscenely un-American, except when enjoyed
by Barack Obama, George Soros, Oprah Winfrey, the Clintons,and other
liberals.

* Conservatives working to preserve American culture are bigoted
hate mongers, but the "cultural heritage" of new immigrants must
be protected and celebrated at all costs.

* Discrimination based on race or gender is wrong. Except when
it is waged against Caucasian men, in which case it is mandated
by law & called Affirmative Action.

* Invading a foreign nation is wrong, except when illegal aliens
from Mexico invade America.

* Those who believe English should be the official American
language are "racist," whereas Hispanics who prefer Spanish to
English are perfectly justified because "diversity is our
greatest strength."

* The earning power of American citizens is in sharp decline;
still, the U.S. should grant amnesty to millions of illegal
aliens who will work for lower wages and without benefits.

* Blocking the sale of port security to UAE was necessary to
protect homeland security, but securing the border with Mexico
would “scapegoat” Hispanics.

* Illegal aliens should be licensed to drive-- to avoid breaking
the law by driving illegally.

* Freedom of speech must never be repressed, except when
“hurtful” to any constituency of the Democrat party, in which
case it becomes hate speech.

* Tax cuts are wrong when money is returned to people
who actually paid taxes, but perfectly fine when sent to those
who paid none.

* All symbols of Christianity must be quashed so as to offend no
one, whereas all things Islamic must be heavily promoted in the
name of religious awareness, diversity, & tolerance.

* Businesses are oppressive, fascist institutions and must not
be allowed to become too large. On the other hand government,
when run by Democrats, creates wealth & happiness and should be
expanded as much as possible.

* Military force must never be used, except when needed to
advance interests not vital to the United States, or to obscure
a Democrat president’s sexual misconduct in the Oval Office.

Think about it-- Are you mindless enough to be a liberal?

Or do you wish to borrow my handgun?

America Is No Better Than Mexico, Right?


















By John W. Lillpop

In my dissertations about illegal aliens and Mexico, I often use terms like third-world disaster or other unflattering hyperbole to describe our southern neighbor.

Mexican apologists protest my language by claiming that Mexican culture is equal to American culture. Some allegedly educated folk even suggest that in some ways Mexico is superior to our great United States.

Can you imagine, Mexico superior to the U.S. in anything? Has a more absurd notion ever been advanced?

To those who are in love with Mexico, my question is:

If Mexico is so damn wonderful, why do scores of millions of Mexicans risk life and limb to escape that wretched state by invading America?

If Mexico has so much to offer, why not stay there? Or go back?

The fact is, Mexico is a third-world sewer, cesspool, and disaster that cannot feed, house, educate, or provide medical care for its own people.

That is wonderful?

The latest proof that Mexico is a disaster comes from the ongoing carnage where more than 27,000 people have been killed in this nation's pathetic war with drug cartels, which, by the way, the cartels are winning!

In addition, the United States has issued a travel advisory to alert travelers of the unsafe conditions in Mexico.

Yet, to some, Mexico is equal to or better than America?

Those who hold that absurd fantasy should do the honorable thing by moving to Mexico. And take a couple of hundred thousand illegal aliens with you, please!

Above all else, be careful. Do not drink the water, and do not tangle with Mexican gangs and drug cartels!

19.4.10

Obama’s Lunar Lunacy: Camelot Would Be Appalled!

















By John W. Lillpop

When Barack Obama gazes into the mirror each morning, the image staring back at this arrogant poser is a very well tanned John F. Kennedy.

Indeed, Obama fashions himself as the fourth Kennedy brother and heir apparent to Camelot and the rich Kennedy legacy.

However, were he still around, JFK would be insulted by the very notion that the policies of this upstart from Kenya are a continuation of Camelot.

To begin with, JFK was the catalyst behind America’s mission to the moon and outer space.

He was an ardent, pro-space Democrat who understood that being number # 1 is about more than grabbing bragging rights for one’s high school soccer team.

JFK knew that being #1 in space exploration was vital in maintaining America’s leadership and dominance in world affairs. Beating the pants off the USSR was not only fun, it was essential to the notion that freedom and democracy are vastly superior to Communism in improving the quality of life through advanced technology.

How might JFK react to Obama’s recent decision to abandon further explorations to the moon? Would the fact that Obama would rather spend hundreds of billions on education and health care for illegal aliens soften the impact on the JFK ego?

Other Obama policies that JFK would find distressing:

Taxes: JFK “got it” with respect to taxes. He knew that raising taxes was an almost perfect formula for sabotaging the U.S. economy.

How might JFK react to Obama’s out-of-control spending and proposed tax increases during a deep and dark recession?

Cuba: JFK nearly went to war over the fact that Fidel Castro imported nuclear-capable Russian missiles into his miserable little island, just 90 miles from U.S. soil.

How might JFK feel about the fact that President Obama, who was one year old at the time of the Cuban missile crisis, has ignored the history and lessons to be learned from that harrowing experience?

Were he alive today, JFK would be outraged at the immature arrogance of the Marxist currently squatting in the White House.

When it comes to Obama, JFK would surely endorse a famous punch line from a political debate, tailored to fit the One:

Obama, you’re no JFK!

America’s Immigration System Is NOT Broken











John W. Lillpop

Those who advocate on behalf of illegal aliens have concocted yet another dismal argument to oppose secure borders, enforcement of the law, and deportation of invading criminals.

The latest leftist lunacy is, "America's immigration system is broken. We cannot stop illegal immigration without comprehensive immigration reform."

Phooey!

That silly argument is used by President Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and other out-of-touch liberals to justify their mindless refusal to protect America from the massive wave of third-world humanity that threatens to destroy our once our great nation.

Nonsensical argument is also the weapon of choice for Felipe Calderon and Vicente Fox, present and past presidents of Mexico, who would love to shove even more of Mexico’s intractable problems across the border for American taxpayers to deal with.

In fact, of course, America’s immigration system is not broken at all! Existing immigration laws would work fine, if enforced.

What IS broken is the rule of law by millions of illegal aliens, mostly from Mexico, who ignore our borders and immigration statutes.

What IS also broken is the sacred Constitutional oath of office taken by politicians who are supposed to defend America from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

Most tragically, recent presidents from both parties in concert with traitors in the U.S. Congress, have refused to secure our borders or enforce existing immigration laws, even in the wake of 9/11 and the global war on terror.

Instead, our so-called leaders blather on incessantly about "comprehensive" reform, which is liberal-speak for amnesty. In reality, comprehensive reform is the Monopoly- game equivalent of "get out of jail" cards for 20 million criminal freeloaders and scam artists who have no moral or legal basis for being here.

A word of caution is in order for moon bats operating unless the foolish illusion that Americans can be played like a board game forever: As President Obama and the Democrats are learning, there is a limit to the amount of stupidity that the American people will countenance.

That limit is breached by the 'broken immigration system' idiocy.

Fact is, a new patriot’s rallying cry is emerging from sea to shining sea. That cry is, "America don't need no stinkin' immigration reform!"

Prudent politicians interested in a legacy and or a future in politics need to heed that cry. Or perish.

18.4.10

Obama Blames W. for Eyjafjallajokull: Urges Congress to “Get Off Your Ash for America!”
















Satire by John W. Lillpop

Joined by Al Gore, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, and the White House weather czar in the Rose Garden on Sunday, President Obama denounced the eruptions of the Eyjafjallajokull volcano in the strongest possible language:

“Once again, the Earth and its six billion inhabitants are paying an enormous price for eight years of environmental, economic, and political neglect and abuse at the hands of George W. Bush and his Republican co-conspirators in Congress.

“As any credible scientist seeking the truth will readily admit, the devastation of Europe by Eyjafjallajokull is directly linked to the reckless, pro-business, anti-people policies of the last Republican administration.

“When the scientific facts are reviewed objectively, there can be no disputing that the mega tons of ash now polluting the skies over Europe were ‘inherited’ from the Bush administration.

“Therefore, it falls to my administration to clean up another inherited mess which, if left unattended, could wipe out all of the progress that we have made over the past 14 months.

“Accordingly, I am issuing a clarion call to members of the Senate and House to join me in combating violent volcanic eruptions caused by Republican environmental malfeasance.

“On Monday, we will formally announce details of the “Volcanic and Financial Institutions Reform Act of 2010,” which will combine the so-called Cap and Trade and Wall Street reform bills into one voter-friendly, understandable bill that will save the world and main street from further carnage at the hands of conservatives.

“In formulating this aggressive, pro-active approach to solving America’s thorny problems, my administration has consulted with renowned scientists like Al Gore, Katie Couric, Keith Olbermann, Prince Charles, Bono, and others of equal status.

“Without exception, all agree that the “Volcanic and Financial Institutions Reform Act of 2010,” is urgently needed and must be enacted before the start of summer. That gives us about six weeks to act.

“Skeptics—mostly greedy Republicans—will immediately attack the four trillion price tag as too expensive.

To which we must answer, ‘There is no price too high to pay for the health and prosperity of our citizens and illegal aliens. This we can, and must, do.’

"Our rallying cry will be, ‘Get off Your Ash for America!’


--------------------------------------------------------------

Thus, another 4 trillion dollars of wealth will be stolen from future generations of Americans to fund the Marxist fantasies of a very confused community organizer from Kenya!

17.4.10

Another Trillion Dollar “Crisis,” Courtesy of Barack Obama














By John W. Lillpop

Eventually, the American people and the mainstream media are bound to wise up to Barack Obama’s bait and switch scheme of screaming “crisis” in order to waste trillions more of the U.S. treasury on failed liberal causes.

Obama’s latest “wolf” cry involves his Marxist proposals for reform of the financial industry. In a nutshell, Obama wants to destroy private enterprise in the financial industry by replacing it with onerous government regulations and oversight.

And why not?

After all, the government has amassed an astounding record of success in fixing unemployment with a trillion dollar stimulus, managing Social Security and Medicare into solvency, stabilizing the real estate market by forcing lenders to approve mortgage loans based on race and or ethnicity quotas rather than on ability to repay, and on and on.

Given that track record, why not hand Marxists the keys to America’s financial institutions and complete the devastation envisioned by President Obama when he took office on January 20, 2008?

As reported at myway.com, in part:

“WASHINGTON (AP) - The U.S. is destined to endure a new economic crisis that sticks taxpayers with the bill unless Congress tightens oversight of the financial industry, President Barack Obama said Saturday.

“The overhaul is the next major piece of legislation that Obama wants to sign into law this year, but solid GOP opposition in the Senate is jeopardizing that goal.

‘Every day we don't act, the same system that led to bailouts remains in place, with the exact same loopholes and the exact same liabilities,’ Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address. ‘And if we don't change what led to the crisis, we'll doom ourselves to repeat it.

‘Opposing reform will leave taxpayers on the hook if a crisis like this ever happens again,’ the president said.

A proposal that Senate Democrats are readying for debate creates a mechanism for liquidating large financial companies to avoid a meltdown.”


Sound familiar? It should because it is the same fear-mongering rhetoric that Obama used in begging for the original bail out, the stimulus debacle, and health care reform.

After all, Obama believes that crisis, real or managed, is an excellent opportunity to implement his Marxist agenda.

How much longer is Obama going to be able to get away with his bait and switch double talk?