31.7.12

Relief for Illegal Aliens Whom Have Suffered “Indignity” and “Injustice” for Far Too Long!





By John W. Lillpop



Pity the poor, abused illegal aliens who have been held against their will in America, forced to live on food stamps and welfare for which they are not eligible, obligated to vote for Democrats whom they do not know, and, worse of all, relegated to the “shadows” of America society!\

Oh, the pain, the agony, and the shame of it all!

As reported at the reference, a bus load of 30 of these sterling characters has begun a cross-country tour of protests:
A busload of illegal immigrants has begun a month-long, cross-country tour of protests culminating at the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., according to reports.

Approximately 30 men and women departed Phoenix, Ariz., on Sunday on a trip scheduled to hit states that have passed aggressive laws against illegal immigration, reports the Charlotte Observer.

          The bus will pass through Colorado, New Orleans, Atlanta and several other cities en route  to   
          the DNC convention.
“We are tired of the injustice,” Fernando Lopez, an illegal immigrant who is originally from Mexico but now lives in Phoenix, told the Observer. “We are tired of the indignity.”

Fernando Lopez will be pleased to learn that, as a result of his efforts, a solution is being crafted that will end the nightmare existence for illegal aliens, while lifting the spirits of American taxpayers at the same time.

It’s really quite simple, and relatively inexpensive to boot:

A group of American citizens and taxpayers, finally fed up with supporting free loaders and scam artists from Mexico, has joined forces, financial and spiritual, to deal with the illegal alien squatters.

To wit, an air-conditioned bus for 30 has been chartered from Charlotte, NC to Tijuana, Mexico for September 3.  A one-way trip, we should add!

The bus will carry the invaders away from the shadows, the injustice, and the indignity of America, on a non-stop journey back to third-world Mexico, that quaint little failed state just south of the US border.


Adios, and have a nice trip home, Fernando and friends-- and do not bother to write—even if you can!



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/79183.html#ixzz22EHzI66Q




OUTRAGE: Illegal Aliens Obama Refused to Deport Commited 19 Murders, 142 Sex Crimes!





By John W. Lillpop



To the list of high crimes and misdemeanors for which Barack Hussein Obama should be charged and convicted add the following:

Aiding and abetting in 19 murders and 142 sex crimes which were committed by illegal aliens whom should have been deported but were not because of President Obama’s anti-rule of law stance and obsession with growing the Democrat Party.

As reported at the reference:

The Obama administration declined to try to deport more than 36,000 illegal immigrants that were arrested on other charges between 2008 and 2011, including some who went on to commit 19 murders, 3 attempted murders and 142 sex crimes, the House Judiciary Committee said Tuesday.

All told, the administration was alerted to nearly 160,000 immigrants — most of them here legally — who were arrested during the three-year period. They went on to be charged in nearly 60,000 more crimes, according to the committee and the Congressional Research Service, which issued a report on the matter.

The findings stem from the Obama administration’s Secure Communities program, which was designed to identify immigrants who run afoul of the law and who the administration decides it wants to deport.
While hundreds of thousands have been sent back home under the program, 159,286 were not put in deportation proceedings during the period under review, CRS said.

About three quarters of those weren’t eligible for deportation because they were legal immigrants and their criminal records didn’t rise to the level of deportation, though nearly a quarter could have been deported, CRS said.
Those who could have been deported but were released later went on to commit the 19 murders, 3 attempted murders and 142 sex crimes, the Judiciary Committee said.
“The Obama administration could have prevented these senseless crimes by enforcing our immigration laws,” committee Chairman Lamar Smith said. “But President Obama continues to further his anti-enforcement agenda while innocent Americans suffer the consequences. His unwillingness to enforce immigration laws puts our communities at risk and costs American lives.”
Mr. Smith requested the CRS report, which used data he had subpoenaed from the Homeland Security Department.

The department didn’t immediately return a request for comment Tuesday morning.

Secure Communities has come under fire from both sides of the aisle.

Many Democrats say it casts its net too wide, which means illegal immigrants who have committed relatively minor offenses could be deported. But Republicans, led by Mr. Smith, say the administration is actually being too picky in those it chooses to deport, which results in criminals being released back onto the streets to commit more crimes."
Wake up, America!

This president and the Democrat Party is willing to sacrifice the lives and safety of innocent Americans just to pander to illegal aliens for votes.

America must NOT reelect this dreadfully immoral man and must defeat all Democrats!!


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/jul/31/illegals-released-feds-19-murders-142-sex-crimes/

Desperate Obama Going BACK to Last Century For Help!





By John W. Lillpop

President Obama has chosen FORWARD as his campaign theme for the 2012 election.

The idea is to contrast futurist, modern thinking within the Democrat Party to the “old school” stuck-in-the-past relics offered by conservative Republicans, particularly the obsession with costly foreign wars and failed economic policies for which President George W. Bush is so notorious.

Failed Bush policies, which four years later, still have America in deep recession and broke, despite a trillion-dollar stimulus and tons of Marxist CHANGE, but precious little HOPE!

So, is FORWARD! still the Obama clarion cry?

If so, how weird is it that President Obama has been forced to reach way back into history for help from none other than William Jefferson Clinton, former U.S. president and the last Commander-in-Chief to be impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors while in office?

As reported at the reference:

The up-and-down relationship between President Obama and Democratic predecessor Bill Clinton is back on the upswing.

Clinton is getting a prime time speaking slot at the convention that renominates Obama in early September -- it's part of the current president's plan to promote his economic policy with the help of a predecessor who presided over a boom economy in the 1990s.

"President Clinton oversaw the longest economic expansion in U.S. history, pursuing many of the same policies that President Obama is proposing and implementing today," said Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, who chairs the Democratic convention to be held Sept. 3-6 in Charlotte.”
The danger, of course, is that Bill Clinton will remind voters of just how incompetent and dismally ineffective Obama has been over the past four years!

Voters may also legitimately ask, “If FORWARD is the way to go, Why Is Obama going BACK to the last Century for Help?”

After all, Bill Clinton is sooooooooo 20th Century.

Voters may also wonder, "When will Obama mature to the point where he can stand on his own two feet? Will he ever be able to handle the presidency with skill and ability and without blaming W. Bush and using Clinton as a crutch?"



http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/07/obama-and-clinton-together-again/1

30.7.12

NYC Mayor Bloomberg: Saving NYC Youth by Staying Abreast of, and Hiding, Baby Formula!









By John W. Lillpop





BREAKING NEWS: It has been revealed that New York City Mayor Bloomberg has far too much time on his hands.

As a result, the “Bloomberg Time Bubble” has allowed this dangerous control freak time to create more and more intrusive ways for the City to stick its unwelcome nose into the day-to-day affairs of New York citizenry, affairs best handled by the citizenry themselves.

Citizenry which, by the way, would prefer to be left alone, and which would be far better off if NYC would go straight to hell!

Evidently, Mayor Bloomberg has not learned a thing from the national blow back (mockery, outrage) that ensued following his exaggerated hysteria over Sugary Drinks in excess of 16 ounces, and his passion to reign supreme over Sugar Drinks in NYC, and beyond, if possible.

Mayor Bloomberg, Comptroller of Sugary Drinks! What a legacy, huh?

Not content to rest on his Sugary Drinks laurels, this twisted malcontent decided that he was elected Mayor in order to deal with urgent City issues--- like assuring that NYC babies are breast fed!

Indeed, Bloomberg reasoned that only a wealthy man with a disabling Napoleon Complex would have the wisdom to take NYC mothers to task for using baby formula when all that natural milk in their breasts was available!

Thus, the Mayor acted as reported at the reference, in part:



The nanny state is going after moms.

Mayor Bloomberg is pushing hospitals to hide their baby formula behind locked doors so more new mothers will breast-feed.

Starting Sept. 3, the city will keep tabs on the number of bottles that participating hospitals stock and use — the most restrictive pro-breast-milk program in the nation.
While breast-feeding activists applaud the move, bottle-feeding moms are bristling at the latest lactation lecture.

“If they put pressure on me, I would get annoyed,” said Lynn Sidnam, a Staten Island mother of two formula-fed girls, ages 4 months and 9 years. “It’s for me to choose.”

Under the Latch On program new mothers who want formula won’t be denied it, but hospitals will keep infant formula in out-of-the-way secure storerooms or in locked boxes like those used to dispense and track medications.

With each bottle a mother requests and receives, she’ll also get a talking-to. Staffers will explain why she should offer the breast instead.

“It’s the patient’s choice,” said Allison Walsh, of Beth Israel Medical Center. “But it’s our job to educate them on the best option.”
Perhaps the BEST OPTION would be for Mayor Bloomberg to get a girl friend or other significant other of his choosing, move to a third-world hell hole like Mexico where his nanny- meddling might be appreciated, or get a job with the USDA where his foolish ideas would fit right in!


Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/mayor_knows_breast_WqU1iYRQvwbEkDuvn0vb1H#ixzz227Cu8Qqo



29.7.12

Mitt “No Twit,” Says Knowledgeable Brit!





By John W. Lillpop


In a crass violation of the wholesome, brotherly spirit which is supposed to permeate the Olympics, cheesy tabloids in London (aren’t they all?) greeted Mitt Romney with impolite, politically incorrect, and nasty headlines declaring “Mitt, the Twit!”

This sophomoric greeting was immediately seized upon by American main-stream media “journalists” and the DNC and celebrated as proof that Romney knows nothing about foreign policy, which should immediately disqualify him from consideration for the Oval Office, although that standard has never applied to the current interloper residing at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

While Romney may not yet be a foreign policy whiz, the man KNOWS how to run an Olympics!

And unlike the aforementioned interloper in the White House, Romney can be trusted to tell the truth now and again.

Doubt all that? Take it from a Brit who should know, Piers Morgan, CNN host as reported at the reference:


CNN host Piers Morgan appeared on his network with Brooke Baldwin on Thursday where he talked about his interview with Mitt and Ann Romney.

Prior to playing clips of the interview, Morgan was asked about Romney’s comments to NBC where he wondered if London was up to the security challenges that the Olympics will pose. The comments drew sharp criticism from some members of the British press corps. But Morgan shocked when he defended Romney’s comments saying that the presumptive Republican nominee was “absolutely right” to question whether the U.K. was ready for the Olympics.

Baldwin asked Morgan for his thought on Romney saying that he found London’s lack of security preparation for the Olympics “disconcerting.” Morgan said he thought Romney was correct.

“It’s no secret over here that for the last three weeks the security around the Olympics has been a shambles,” said Morgan. “The outside firm they got in to run it has been all over the place – they didn’t have enough people and the army had to be drafted in. So, Mitt Romney was only saying exactly what has been happening.”

“He’s run an Olympics, so I thought he was perfectly entitled to be critical,” Morgan continued. He said that the English press jumped on him because they wanted Romney to “talk us up a bit,” but the substance of Romney’s critique was on point.

“I thought it was a bit of a fuss about nothing,” said Morgan. “He was just speaking the truth which can sometimes be rather unpalatable.”

Well said, Mr. Morgan!

How refreshing to hear an objective critique of Mitt Romney from a member of the leftist media!
A word to US leftist Media: Mitt is NO Twit!

Got it?

http://www.mediaite.com/tv/piers-morgan-defends-mitt-romneys-olympics-comments-he-was-just-speaking-the-truth/

28.7.12

Red Alert: Only 7 Shopping Days Left Until Barack’s 51st!





Satire by John W. Lillpop



How time does fly when one is having fun!

Seems like only yesterday Barack Obama was being feted as the answer to ALL problems, large and small, domestic and international.

Now Barack is considered the CAUSE of most of those problems, which have grown considerably worse since his tragic inauguration!

Still, as nauseating as it is to admit, Barack Hussein Obama was and, until January 20, 2013, will be President of the United States.

As such, the gnarly Marxist with the huge ears and even bigger ego deserves the respect and honor due his lofty, albeit undeserved, station in life.

Thus, as a red-alert service to US patriots and Democrats alike, this is issued to remind all that there are only SEVEN (7) shopping days until The One turns 51!

Technically speaking, it is actually just six days and 14 hours using Kenyan time! But why pick nit?

This reminder may send some into a frenzy of shopping, wrapping, mailing, blah, blah, blah, in order to be ready for Barack’s big day.

A word of advice: Relax, and follow these steps.

First, decide what gift would be appropriate for a community organizer who has parlayed a lifetime on the government dole into a King’s Ransom, but whom tries to pretend that he is just an average Joe, a typical everyday American with degrees from Harvard and Columbia.

Personally, I have winnowed my possible Obama birthday gifts down to these precious few:


( )Book, “The Art of Creating and Marketing Birth Certificates for Private and Professional Gain.”

So far I have not found such a book, but if anyone knows of one, or is willing to write one on a quickie schedule, let me know.
( )Calendar where everyday is August 4 and YOU ARE GREAT is the Uplifting Word(s) for the Day,

( )Chicago Chamber of Commerce Booklet entitled, “Renewing Your Love for Chicago: A Guide for Mobsters Moving Back to the Windy City!” and,


( )One-way bus ticket from Washington, D.C. to Chicago for four, 1201 noon, January 20, 2013.


Which gift is the most appropriate (Cheeky!) from a right-wing conservative who, according to DHS Secretary and Mafia Queen Janet Napolitano, is a terrorist threat by virtue of loving America too much?

Finally, to The One, we say: Do not leave embittered and mad: Just leave!

Happy Birthday, in spite of it all!




27.7.12

Obama’s Brag, “We Tried Our Plan…and It Worked!” Faces Reality As Gloomy GDP Numbers Reported!





John W. Lillpop



Another bad Friday for The One as the 2nd Quarter GDP estimates for 2012 were reported by the Commerce Department. Not good news.

As reported:

“The Commerce Department reported Friday that the economy grew at the 1.5 percent rate from April to June, as Americans cut back sharply on spending. The rate matched expectations -- but expectations were low.

In a hastily convened conference call, the Mitt Romney campaign pointed to the figure as the latest sign the economy under Obama simply cannot produce enough growth to put millions of jobless Americans back to work.

"It's a picture of a decelerating economy," said Romney economic adviser Dean Glenn Hubbard. "At that pattern, the economy simply will never return to full employment."
A campaign email with a snapshot of the gloomy GDP headlines also poked at Obama's recent "you didn't build that" gaffe. The email was titled: "The Obama Economy: Barack Obama Built This."

While Republicans used the report as a campaign cudgel, the White House tried to look on the bright side -- in that, the economy is technically growing.

"Today's report shows that the economy posted its twelfth straight quarter of positive growth," Alan Krueger, chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, said in a statement. "While the economy continues to move in the right direction, additional growth is needed to replace the jobs lost in the deep recession that began at the end of 2007."

This GDP report on the heels of Obama’s gushing about “We tried our plan—and it worked!” See Link below:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gS5FJR34C5U&feature=player_embedded



Pity the Poor Democrats: Down to celebrating the fact that the economy has yet to fall intoanother  recession, or worse.


Intelligent Life Goes Missing at USDA!





By John W. Lillpop


The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) has been the object of much public scorn and ridicule recently for spending hard-earned taxpayer money to encourage more Americans to use food stamps.

The USDA idiocy of promoting dependence on public handouts even when so far as to partner with the Mexican government for help in reaching Mexicans living in America (legally?) and making sure said people were aware of the food stamp opportunities available just for asking.

Using US Taxpayer money in a foreign nation and foreign language to encourage eating on the US public dole must be a record-setting act of stupidity in an Administration where rampant stupidity is a badge of honor!

But wait, there is more!

As reported at the reference, meat heads at USDA have exceeded stupidity standards with a “Meatless Monday” promotion which takes the cake for government stupidity.
As reported:


The USDA recently pushed a ‘Meatless Mondays’ initiative in an online newsletter to employees. Yes, that’s right -- the same folks who are supposed to back our countries’ farmers and ranchers attempted to proselytize ‘green’ initiatives… in the midst of a drought.

"How will going meatless one day of the week help the environment? The production of meat, especially beef (and dairy as well), has a large environmental impact. According to the U.N., animal agriculture is a major source of greenhouse gases and climate change. It also wastes resources."

The update went on to cite the "many health concerns" associated with "excessive consumption" of meat. It noted that many people are just not ready to go all-vegetarian, and said forgoing meat one day a week "is a small change that could produce big results."

So let’s get this straight – allegiance to the United Nations trumps America’s farmers and ranchers. Got it.

National Cattlemen’s Beef Association President J.D. Alexander called the move an ‘animal rights extremist campaign to ultimately end meat consumption.’
“This is truly an awakening statement by USDA, which strongly indicates that USDA does not understand the efforts being made in rural America to produce food and fiber for a growing global population in a very sustainable way,” said Alexander. “USDA was created to provide a platform to promote and sustain rural America in order to feed the world. This move by USDA should be condemned by anyone who believes agriculture is fundamental to sustaining life on this planet.”
Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) grilled Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack on the newsletter and asked whether “Meatless Mondays” are officially endorsed. A USDA spokeswoman’s response was ‘no’ and the posting was subsequently removed.
"Never in my life would I have expected USDA to be opposed to farmers and ranchers," Moran said in a statement. "American farmers and ranchers deserve a USDA that will pursue supportive policies rather than seek their further harm. With extreme drought conditions plaguing much of the United States, the USDA should be more concerned about helping drought-stricken producers rather than demonizing an industry reeling from the lack of rain."
Unbelievable!


At a time when America the great is set to implement huge spending cuts, including massive cuts in defense, which will weaken national defense and make our nation more vulnerable in an increasingly hostile world…some leftist dim wits are spending taxpayer money to promote “Meatless Mondays”??

What is behind this recent USDA tangent to provide unwise, unwelcome, unneeded, and un-American nanny advice?

A bit of advice to Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and other USDA malcontents: If you choose to not eat meat on Monday or any other day of the week, that IS YOUR business and your right!

Just keep your private preferences—well, PRIVATE!


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2012/07/26/usda_retracts_call_for_meatless_mondays











26.7.12

Speaking of Reducing Gun Violence, What About Fast and Furious, Mr. President?



By John W. Lillpop



President Obama took a political risk by jumping (sort of) on the gun control band wagon in response to the tragic carnage in a movie theater Colorado.

As reported at the reference, in part, he said:

NEW ORLEANS (Reuters) - President Barack Obama pledged on Wednesday to work with leaders of all political stripes to "arrive at a consensus" on how to reduce gun violence across the United States after the Colorado shootings highlighted the issue in an election year.


Thus, did the president engage the volatile issue of 2nd Amendment rights.

In so doing, Obama cited an awful incident in which a 24-year-old psychopath loser turned a movie theater into a shooting gallery, the sort of tragedy that is repeated every day all across America, according to the president.

No one will argue the gravity of the Aurora slaughter and the unnecessary heart break visited on the victims’ families.

However, while lamenting the awful misuse of weapons by a demented man on a mission to kill for fame and glory, Obama has consistently ignored the misuse of weapons by HIS Department of Justice, a crime which cost an American border patrol agent and hundreds of Mexican citizens their lives.

Its called Fast and Furious and is so dangerous because the Obama Department of Justice under Eric Holder deliberately caused lethal weapons to be shipped to drug cartels in Mexico.

Again, the US government caused deadly weapons to be placed in the hands of foreign drug cartels.

 Where is the outrage?

Missing in action---Which means that a dramatically important gun violence issue
is being ignored. because of election year politcs.

Some one needs to ask Obama:  What sort of gun controls would prevent a 2nd Amendment-hating Marxist dictator posing as US President from shipping deadly weapons to a foreign drug cartel where said weapons would be used to murder at least one US border patrol agent and hundreds of innocent foreign citizens?

Indeed, can more strict control laws prevent an ideologically-driven President and or his administration from sponsoring the crime known as “Fast and Furious”?

Furthermore, what oversights and checks and balances would it take to empower the US Congress to overcome the obstruction, stonewalling and flat-out cover-up of “Fast and Furious” crimes?

Would tougher gun control laws prevent a misguided president from claiming “Executive Privilege” in order to circumvent and shut down oversight actions?

In sum, what sort of gun control laws would it take to keep dangerous weapons out of the hands of President Obama and his Department of Justice where said weapons would be used against American law enforcement?

Finally: Which threat poses the greatest danger to America: A random act by a mad man, or a concentrated, programmed  effort by the US Government and Eric Holder?

Just asking!



http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2012-07-26/news/sns-rt-us-usa-campaign-obama-violencebre86p02b-20120725_1_gun-violence-obama-pledges-gun-control







Corresponding With Barack!




By John W. Lillpop



My email box was recently invaded by a money plea from President Obama. It read:

           John --

My upcoming birthday next week could be the last one I celebrate as President of the United States, but that's not up to me -- it's up to you.

This July deadline is our most urgent yet, coming after two consecutive months of being significantly outraised (sic) by Romney and the Republicans.
And if you pitch in $3 or whatever you can before midnight tonight, you and a guest will be automatically entered to join me at my birthday get-together next month:

Thanks. Hope I'll see you soon.
- Barack



I replied to The One thusly:


Dear Mr. President:

As with your handling of the national economy, your problem with your campaign is OVER SPENDING, not revenues! You are now running deficits each month.

Stop spending so much! Do the math!

This is your last birthday in office...next year you will be in Chicago or Honolulu doing community organizing. So enjoy it while you can!
John W. Lillpop

Ahhhh. That felt good to say how I really feel--being so reserved and polite, I often fail to let it all hang out!

Being cheeky can be fun!





















25.7.12

Would Tougher Gun Laws Prevent Another “Fast and Furious” Scandal?





By John W. Lillpop



While the loony left, in concert with the moronic mainstream media, frets, weeps, and wallows about how lax gun control laws allowed a 24-year-old psychopath to turn a movie theater into a shooting gallery, the REAL issue of the day is ignored.

Namely: What sort of gun controls would prevent a 2nd Amendment-hating Marxist dictator posing as US President from shipping deadly weapons to a foreign drug cartel where said weapons would be used to murder at least one US border patrol agent and hundreds of innocent foreign citizens?

Indeed, can more strict control laws prevent an ego-manic, albeit, duly elected,  President from sponsoring the crime known as “Fast and Furious”?

Furthermore, what oversights and checks and balances would it take to empower the US Congress to overcome the obstruction, stonewalling and flat-out cover-up of “Fast and Furious” crimes?

Would tougher gun control laws prevent a misguided community organized from claiming “Executive Privilege” in order to circumvent and shut down oversight actions?

In sum, what sort of gun control laws would it take to keep dangerous weapons out of the hands of President Obama and his Department of Justice where said weapons would be used against American law enforcement?



Just asking!





Romney’s “You Didn’t Build That” Ad Defrosts The Cool One!



By John W. Lillpop



Besides being a self-anointed Messiah, the self-declared Smartest Man in the world, and possessor of hundreds of other super-human attributes, Barack Hussein Obama was supposed to be as cool as a cucumber, unflappable, level headed, and powered by raw intelligence rather than raw emotion.

He was, according to himself, perfect for the job of Commander-in-Chief where steely nerves and a cast-iron stomach are a must, especially when one is confronted by evil Tea Party members and their advocates in the US House.

Tea Party thugs, those scalawag rebels who disrupt the orderly affairs of One’s Kingdom by insisting on spending constraint, frugality, and other outlandish proposals, perhaps suitable for the poor, unwashed under classes, but which have no place whatsoever in a Progressive Monarchy-Tyranny run by an ego-maniac.

Over the past four years The One has been exposed as quite sensitive to criticism and opposition, not quite the cool character described in his self-authored biographical blurbs.

When it comes to unraveling the president and exposing his not-so-cool persona, Republican Mitt Romney appears to have hit a raw nerve (and gold mine!) with his attack ads which take Obama to task for his foolish “You Did Not Build That” idiocy.

As reported, in part, at the reference:



SEATTLE – President Barack Obama said Tuesday that he's losing his patience over the Republican attacks aimed at his “you didn’t build that” comment.


“I have to tell you, I generally have patience with what the other side says about me, that’s a requirement of this job,” Obama said during a $5,000-per-plate fundraiser here, according to the pool report.


“And if you don’t like folks talking about you, you probably shouldn’t run for president. The one thing I do have no patience for is this argument that somehow what I’m criticizing is success… I want to promote success," Obama said.


Obama's campaign and the Democratic National Committee are trying to get past the remark that has become a center piece of Mitt Romney's stump speech that the administration considers government the only way for individual success in the private sector. Earlier Tuesday, Obama launched an ad campaign in six swing states with the president speaking directly into a camera to explain himself and argue that Romney has taken his words out of context. Obama also swung at Romney Monday in Oakland during his first public remarks in a campaign since the Colorado shooting.
work and individual initiative,” Obama said.


“We’re going to reward risk and entrepreneurship. People are going to have to sweat and sacrifice for their success. But there are some things that we’re also going to do together to make sure that everyone has success. Not everyone’s going to succeed, but everyone’s going to have a shot at success,” the president said.


“So we want success,” Obama added. “We just want to make sure that everybody has a shot. That’s what we’re fighting for, that’s what is at stake in this election."


Again, Obama’s own words haunt him.

For example, his statement, “We’re going to reward risk and entrepreneurship,” is precisely the sort of arrogant, government knows all nonsense that has this nation on the cusp of a 2nd recession!


OBAMA DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THAT PRIVATE ENTERPRISE DOES NOT NEED GOVERNMENT TO REWARD ANYTHING!

Just stay out of the way, Mr. President, and private sector leaders will thrive and prosper, as will the people they employ.

Kudos to the Romney team for hitting pay dirt with the “You Did Not Build That” ad!

Keep it up and ride that baby all the way to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, Governor!


http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/07/obama-has-no-patience-for-you-didnt-build-that-attacks-130016.html

24.7.12

Scott Brown’s Powerful Ad: “Let America Be America Be America Again!”



By John W. Lillpop

Senator Scott Brown(R-Mass.) filled many conservative hearts with joy when he won a 2010 Special Election held to replace the late Senator Ted Kennedy in the US Senate.

From time to time since then, Brown’s star has faded a bit, owing to the fact that his conservative credentials are fairly limited.

Still, Brown is again filling right-wing hearts with joy by virtue of his current ad which is aptly titled, LET AMERICA BE AMERICA AGAIN, a sentiment that scores of millions of Americans share as we approach the elections.

As reported at the reference:
Republican operatives in Washington are praising Scott Brown's latest campaign ad. The ad, a contrast spot being run by the Republican Massachusetts senator, shows that Brown's Democratic opponent, Elizabeth Warren, is to the left on economic issues of John F. Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Lyndon B. Johnson, Gerald Ford, and Ronald Reagan. Watch here:

Instead of being in the mainstream, Warren, along with President Barack Obama, is shown to be an opponent of free enterprise.

The ad is called, "Let America Be America Again."

"Devastating," says one Republican operative. "Long--but does a really good job of showing how radical the Obama/Warren view of the economy really is." The operative believes it should "absolutely" be emulated by other Republican candidates around the country, and adds, "it's such a positive message as opposed to the angry, negative Obama/Warren attacks on free enterprise."


"Powerful," says one top Republican Senate staffer. "I think Brown is touching on a central nerve of American body politic. It's a model for others to follow if they get as lucky with an opponent so far out of touch with American ideals."

The Senate staffer explains: "Americans want to believe in the American dream. Hard work, good morals, commitment to ethics and a little ingenuity can take you anywhere--that's what our parents taught us, that's what makes this land the beacon of hope for billions around the world--and if you're a candidate who disagrees with that fundamental view of America, then you don't deserve to represent Americans in the Senate."

God Bless Scott Brown and America!

Click the link below to view ad:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=oqDIjGsBEP8


Ref http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/gop-operatives-praise-scott-browns-latest-ad_648915.html

23.7.12

Will VOTE (Democrat) for Food Stamps!



By John W. Lillpop



Not so long ago, in the Pre-Obama era of America, receiving food stamps was considered a last resort for those whom experienced particularly difficult times AND whom had exhausted all other means for help, i.e., family, friends, charitable organizations, church affiliations.

Turning to the government for a handout was painful and humiliating back then, because of the social stigma.

All of that has changed in recent years and most dramatically since America has fallen under the tyranny- rule of Marxist Barack Obama.

In the anti-success era of Obama, being on food stamps is encouraged, glorified, and celebrated. It’s even a sign that one finally arrived by out-flanking evil capitalists who live off the sweat and tears of the poor!

The real villains and fools in the Obama era are those who work and try to live responsible lives, independent of government handouts and pity. Even more despicable, those who claim that their own efforts have led to success.

According to Marxist idiots operating federal bureaucracies these days, entitlements (including food stamps) are a birthright, a constitutionally-guaranteed benefit that accrues to one as a result of simply being in America.

An exaggeration?

Consider the following outrageous USDA program involving a USDA partnership with the Mexican government to educate Mexicans living in the US about the availability of food stamps and to BOOST PARTICICPATION—all of which is paid for with your taxes:


The Mexican government has been working with the United States Department of Agriculture to increase participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food stamps.

USDA has an agreement with Mexico to promote American food assistance programs, including food stamps, among Mexican Americans, Mexican nationals and migrant communities in America.
“USDA and the government of Mexico have entered into a partnership to help educate eligible Mexican nationals living in the United States about available nutrition assistance,” the USDA explains in a brief paragraph on their “Reaching Low-Income Hispanics With Nutrition Assistance” web page. “Mexico will help disseminate this information through its embassy and network of approximately 50 consular offices.”

The partnership — which was signed by former USDA Secretary Ann M. Veneman and Mexican Secretary of Foreign Affairs Luis Ernesto Derbez Bautista in 2004 — sees to it that the Mexican Embassy and Mexican consulates in America provide USDA nutrition assistance program information to Mexican Americans, Mexican nationals working in America and migrant communities in America.

The information is specifically focused on eligibility criteria and access.

The goal, for USDA, is to get rid of what they see as enrollment obstacles and increase access among potentially eligible populations by working with arms of the Mexican government in America. Benefits are not guaranteed or provided under the program — the purpose is outreach and education.

Some of the materials the USDA encourages the Mexican government to use to educate and promote the benefit programs are available free online for order and download. A partial list of materials include English and Spanish brochures titled “Five Easy Steps To Snap Benefits,” “How To Get Food Help — A Consumer’s Guide to FNCS Programs,” “Ending Hunger Improving Nutrition Combating Obesity,” and posters with slogans like “Food Stamps Make America Stronger.”

When asked for details and to elaborate on the program, USDA stressed it was established in 2004 and not meant for illegal immigrants.”


Not meant for illegals? And what specific oversights are in place to protect against illegal mooching?  Can’t do too much because of concerns about profiling you say?

Well then, what provisions in place to assure that Mexico pays its “fair share” of the costs?

It’s an American humanitarian gesture, paid for exclusively by American taxpayers, you say?

Enough is enough!

Its bad enough that USDA is promoting the use of food stamps in America! It is intolerable when they use US tax dollars to promote food stamps in a foreign nation!

Once again, Marxist nincompoops are working against the interests of the middle-class in America!

http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/19/usda-partnering-with-mexico-to-boost-food-stamp


22.7.12

In Light of Colorado Shootings, Stupid Mexican President Lectures America!




By John W. Lillpop


Since Felipe Calderon has been President of the third-world sewer known as Mexico, drug cartels have killed about 55,000 Mexicans.

Yet this stupid man feels compelled to offer his advice to the advanced nation of America after some whacked out goof ball murders 12 innocents in Colorado.

As reported at the reference:


MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexican President Felipe Calderon condemned U.S. gun laws as "mistaken" and urged Washington to review them after a shooter killed 12 people and injured more than 50 others at a U.S. movie theater on Friday.

In comments posted on his Twitter account on Saturday, Calderon offered his condolences to the United States after a gunman went on the rampage with an assault rifle at a midnight premier of the new Batman film in Aurora, Colorado.



But Mexico's president, who has repeatedly called on Washington to tighten gun controls to stop weapons flowing from the United States into the hands of Mexican drug cartels, said U.S. weapons policy needed a rethink after the killings.

"Because of the Aurora, Colorado tragedy, the American Congress must review its mistaken legislation on guns. It's doing damage to us all," Calderon said.

The presidency of Calderon, who leaves office at the end of November, has been overshadowed by his efforts to crack down on the drug gangs. Fighting among the cartels and their clashes with the state have killed more than 55,000 people since 2007.”


Got that? 55,000 people have died at the hands of drug cartels in good old Mexico, and this goofy presidente concerns his stupid self with gun laws in America where 12..not twelve thousand!—people were slain.

Note for Felipe: You have presided over the slaughter of 55,000 Mexicans, sir. How many of those hangings, decapitations and savage murders could have been prevented if you had only kept your stupid nose out of America’s business and concentrated more on your failed state?

Please, we do not need a lecture from a certifiable moron. Keep your garbage out of America and keep your nose out as well!

Comprehende?



http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/21/us-usa-shooting-mexico-idUSBRE86K0IL20120721

20.7.12

Murders in Aurora- Colorado: Provoked by the Obama-Holder “Fast and Furious” Crimes?




By John W. Lillpop

As could have been easily predicted, the mainstream media was quick to speculate that the murders in a Aurora, Colorado movie theater were a product of the Tea Party.

As reported at the reference:

ABC News and correspondent Brian Ross apologized Friday after Ross suggested on air that the Colorado mass shooting suspect could be tied to the Tea Party.


As the name of the suspect, identified as 24-year-old James Holmes, first emerged Friday morning, Ross reported on ABC News that he’d found a web page for a “Jim Holmes” on a Colorado Tea Party site.

“There is a Jim Holmes of Aurora, Colorado, page on the Colorado Tea Party site as well, talking about him joining the Tea Party last year,” Ross reported.

He added: “Now we don’t know if this is the same Jim Holmes, but it’s Jim Holmes of Aurora, Colo.”

That man is not the same Jim Holmes. The Colorado Tea Party Patriots, whose Web site Ross was looking at, put out a statement criticizing Ross for even floating the possibility — noting the Jim Holmes with the Tea Party group is 52 years old and not the same person.

“The attempts of some media organizations to characterize the shooter as a Tea Party member without having made any effort to contact our organization are shameless and reprehensible,” the group said in a statement.

Ross clarified on air Friday, as ABC News issued a formal apology.

At least 12 people were killed in the shooting overnight at an Aurora movie theater, while at least 50 were injured.”
But what about the impact that the Obama-Holder “Fast and Furious” crimes may have had on the actual killer?

Under Barack Obama, that outrage apparently included the deliberate transport of dangerous weapons to drug cartels to Mexico in an attempt to heighten the need for greater control over guns and less reverence for the 2nd Amendment.

That progressive folly cost at least one border patrol agent and perhaps scores of Mexicans their lives.
With the federal government involved in such evil schemes, and the cover up of those acts, why is anyone “shocked” when a crazed Batman fan shoots up a theater?


http://oneoldvet.com/?p=24801

More Responsible for “Batman” Murders: Tea Party Activists or, Obama-Holder “Fast and Furious” Scandals?



By John W. Lillpop


The latest tragedy in Colorado no doubt has Democrats like Barack Obama quietly salivating at the prospects for making political hay off the brutal murders of 13 innocent people just out for an evening of entertainment.

Know this: Liberals who refuse to acknowledge the validity of the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution will do anything to tear away at the important right to bear arms.

Under Barack Obama, that outrage apparently included the deliberate transport of dangerous weapons to drug cartels to Mexico in an attempt to heighten the need for greater control over guns and less reverence for the 2nd Amendment.

That progressive folly cost at least one border patrol agent and perhaps scores of Mexicans their lives.

With the federal government involved in such evil schemes, and the cover up of those acts, why is anyone “shocked” when a crazed Batman fan shoots up a theater?

The Constitutional Right to Food Stamps? BULL****!




By John W. Lillpop

Not so long ago, being on food stamps was understood to be a last resort for those whom had fallen on particularly difficult times AND whom had already turned to family, friends, and church members for help.

Turning to the government for a handout was a LAST RESORT—and a painful one at that, because of the social stigma associated with eating on the public dole.

All of that has changed in recent years and most dramatically since America has fallen under the rule of Marxist Barack Obama.

In the anti-success era of Obama, being on food stamps is encouraged, glorified, and celebrated.

According to Marxist idiots operating federal bureaucracies these days, food stamps are a birthright, a constitutionally-guaranteed entitlement that comes with being in America.

I am exaggerating, you protest?

Consider the following outrageous USDA program involving a USDA partnership with the Mexican government to educate Mexicans living in the US about the availability of food stamps and to BOOST PARTICICPATION—all of which is  paid for with your taxes:


The Mexican government has been working with the United States Department of Agriculture to increase participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), or food stamps.

USDA has an agreement with Mexico to promote American food assistance programs, including food stamps, among Mexican Americans, Mexican nationals and migrant communities in America.

“USDA and the government of Mexico have entered into a partnership to help educate eligible Mexican nationals living in the United States about available nutrition assistance,” the USDA explains in a brief paragraph on their “Reaching Low-Income Hispanics With Nutrition Assistance” web page. “Mexico will help disseminate this information through its embassy and network of approximately 50 consular offices.”

The partnership — which was signed by former USDA Secretary Ann M. Veneman and Mexican Secretary of Foreign Affairs Luis Ernesto Derbez Bautista in 2004 — sees to it that the Mexican Embassy and Mexican consulates in America provide USDA nutrition assistance program information to Mexican Americans, Mexican nationals working in America and migrant communities in America.

The information is specifically focused on eligibility criteria and access.

The goal, for USDA, is to get rid of what they see as enrollment obstacles and increase access among potentially eligible populations by working with arms of the Mexican government in America. Benefits are not guaranteed or provided under the program — the purpose is outreach and education.

Some of the materials the USDA encourages the Mexican government to use to educate and promote the benefit programs are available free online for order and download. A partial list of materials include English and Spanish brochures titled “Five Easy Steps To Snap Benefits,” “How To Get Food Help — A Consumer’s Guide to FNCS Programs,” “Ending Hunger Improving Nutrition Combating Obesity,” and posters with slogans like “Food Stamps Make America Stronger.”

When asked for details and to elaborate on the program, USDA stressed it was established in 2004 and not meant for illegal immigrants.”
Not meant for illegals? And what specific oversights are in place to protect against illegal mooching?

Can’t do too much because of concerns about profiling you say?

What provisions in place to assure that Mexico pays its “fair share” of the costs?

It’s an American humanitarian gesture, paid for exclusively by American taxpayers, you say?

I say “BULL****!” Enough is enough!

Its bad enough that USDA is promoting the use of food stamps in America! It is intolerable when they use US tax dollars to promote food stamps in a foreign nation!

Once again, Marxist nincompoops work against the interests of the middle-class in America!

BARACK OBAMA MUST GO!



http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/19/usda-partnering-with-mexico-to-boost-food-stamp

19.7.12

Another Solar Failure: Liberals MADE That, But Taxpayers Get the Bill!






By John W. Lillpop

Democrat leader Harry Reid was a proponent of this huge scam which cost taxpayers $20 million dollars.

Note that the project began under the Bush-42 administration—look for Reid and fellow Marxists like Obama to blame W. for the mess.

The details as reported at the Reference:

The Amonix solar manufacturing plant in North Las Vegas, subsidized by more than $20 million in federal tax credits and grants, has closed its 214,000-square-foot facility about a year after it opened.

Officials at Amonix headquarters in Seal Beach, Calif., have not responded to repeated calls for comment this week, but the company began selling equipment, from automated tooling systems to robotic welding cells, in an online auction Wednesday.

A designer and manufacturer of concentrated photovoltaic solar power systems, Amonix received $6 million in federal tax credits for the North Las Vegas plant and a $15.6 million grant from the U.S. Department of Energy in 2007 for research and development.

Rene Kenerly, a former material and supply manager at Amonix, said the plant has been idle since May 1, when he was laid off. At its peak, the plant had about 700 employees working three shifts a day to produce solar panels for a utility in Amarosa, Colo., he said.

"I don't think they had a lot of training," Kenerly said. "There were a lot of quality issues. A lot of stuff was coming back because it had some functionality issues."

The Amonix plant was highly touted by political leaders and economic development officials when it opened in May 2011. Company executives said they would employ as many as 300 assembly line workers paid $12 to $14 an hour, plus benefits.

Nevada Sen. Harry Reid, U.S. Rep. Shelley Berkley, D-Nev., and Gov. Brian Sandoval were among the political leaders who lauded the company when it announced it would start making solar panels in the Golden Triangle Industrial Park.

Reid in particular has pushed for solar energy research and development in Nevada, drawing parallels between the value of Nevada sunshine and Saudi Arabian oil.”

Another huge drain on American treasure, and Harry Reid is comparing Nevada sunshine to Saudi oil?
Well, Senator, Saudi oil could be made nearly irrelevant if Democrats would open their minds and end the stupid war on Domestic oil production!

Harry Reid should be arrested and charged with fraud, theft of government funds, and abusive insolence. The death penalty would not normally apply, but this case would warrant an exception.


http://www.lvrj.com/business/amonix-closes-north-las-vegas-solar-plant-after-14-months-heavy-federal-subsidies-162901626.html

Is Obama Really Focused on Jobs, Jobs, Jobs? What About “Jobs Council” ?





By John W. Lillpop



President Obama has often claimed that solving America’s unemployment problem is his greatest priority. In fact, he is on record as stating, ”I will Not Rest Until Everyone Can Find a Job.”

Odd, then, that the President’s Job Council has not met in six months as reported at reference 1:

President Barack Obama’s Jobs Council hasn’t met publicly for six months, even as the issue of job creation dominates the 2012 election.

At this point, the hiatus — which reached the half-year mark Tuesday — might be less awkward than an official meeting, given the hornet’s nest of issues that could sting Obama and the council members if the private-sector panel gets together.


The last official meeting of the 26-member President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness took place Jan. 17 in the White House complex. Obama and a slew of other administration officials attended, including his then chief of staff, Bill Daley.”

So, where is the urgency of Jobs, Jobs, Jobs, if the president’s own Jobs Council has not met in six months??


As reported at reference 2, press Secretary Jay Varney points out that Obama has a very full plate:

REPORTER: On the Jobs Council, obviously they've reported to haven't met formally or publicly for six months. Why is exactly is that?

CARNEY: Look, the president solicits and receives input and advice from members of his Jobs Council and others about economic initiatives all the time. And I would point you to the numerous initiatives put forward by the Jobs Council that this administration under the president's direction has taken action, presidential memorandum of August of last year that selected 14 job creating high-priority infrastructure projects for expedited review. Four of those are already under construction.
In March of this year, just four months ago, an executive order launched interagency effort to cut red tape and improve outcomes for infrastructure projects.

REPORTER: So there's no reason they haven't met publicly?

CARNEY: No, there's no specific reason except that the president's obviously got a lot on his plate. But he continues to solicit and receive advice from numerous folks outside the administration about the economy, about ideas he can act on with Congress or administratively to help the economy grow and help it create jobs.”


That's the answer, America. Obama has  failed miserably because he has “ a lot on his plate” ? 

Perhaps that should read, Obama is in over his head?

Obama needs to remember that being overwhelmed sort of comes with the job--he is expected to be fully occupied and capable of multitasking. 

Besides, Obama has 38 or so Czars  working in the White House and an unknown number of assistants supporting him.

Bottom line:  Obama has lost track of the agonizing truth that 23 million Americans are under/unemployed.

It is also important to note that Obama has squeezed in 100 fundraisers and lord knows how many rounds of golf.

It all boils down to another broken Obama promise: ”I will Not Rest Until Everyone Can Find a Job.”

Clearly, President Obama is not up to the job. America needs to elect a man who can handle a bigger plate!


Mitt Romney for president!
Ref 1 http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0712/78637.html#ixzz214zzso00

Ref 2 http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/07/18/carney_on_why_jobs_council_hasnt_met_in_six_months_obama_has_a_lot_on_his_plate.html









17.7.12

Barack Obama in Dead Heat With Romney: Why?


By John W. Lillpop


America seems to be in serious decline:

The economy is stalled (or worse) and may be headed toward a double-dip recession;

Unemployment is wretched;

Global unrest involving Syria, Iran, Egypt, and Libya portend war in the Middle East. Israel, as always, is on the brink of annihilation;

The national debt is close to $16 trillion dollars and rising.

America’s standing and influence in the world is diminished.

Barack Obama has none literally nothing to address any of these issues, or, if he has, has only has made things worse.

Yet, Obama is still very competetive. Why?

1. Obama America’s  enjoys biased and  favorable treatment from the liberal media.

He is no longer considered a Messiah-like figure, but most liberal news outlets (New York Times, Washington Post, LA Times, MSNBC, CBS, etc.) twist and mangle news coverage to Obama’s advantage.

2. Obama enjoys overwhelming advantage in the Hispanic and African-America constituencies, although minority groups  suffer untenable unemployment, foreclosures, and bankruptcy rates.

How would a Caucasian president running on Obama’s record be received in the media and among voters? Would he be in a dead heat near the end of his first term?

Think about it.










16.7.12

Bill Clinton’s Legacy Haunts Hillary as Egyptians Shout “Monica, Monica, Monica!”

By John W. Lillpop



Pity poor Hillary Clinton.

After being publicly humiliated time and again by hubby Bill Clinton’s wandering, out-of-control libido in the White House years ago, Hillary has had to endure no recent “Bimbo Eruptions.”

Apparently, by-pass surgery and advancing age have slowed Slick down, at least as far as we know.


Which has freed Mrs. Clinton to serve quite honorably in her role as Secretary of State.

Indeed, Hillary has turned in a sterling performance, thanks, in part, to not being distracted by scandalous headlines and BREAKING NEWS flashes about Bill Clinton’s sexual indiscretions and possible sex crimes. (Remember Juanita Broaddrick?)

It would seem as though Bill’s sordid past is but a distant memory, not a current concern.

However, much to Hillary’s dismay, folks in Egypt have good memories when it comes to adulterous scandals carried out in the Oval Office and adjoining rooms.

As reported at the reference:
Hillary Clinton was taunted by chants of "Monica, Monica" by tomato-throwing demonstrators as she visited the Egyptian port city of Alexandria on Sunday.


The chants, referring to the Monica Lewinsky scandal when her husband, Bill Clinton, was president, were heard outside the US consulate as she visited for its reopening.

An embarrassed Egyptian security official said they were chanting "Monica, Monica" and "Irhal, Clinton" (Get out, Clinton.)

Tomatoes, shoes and a water bottle were thrown at part of Clinton's motorcade as it pulled up, protected by riot police, although a US official said Clinton's own vehicle was not hit.

The protest appears to have been the result of suspicions that Washington had helped the Muslim Brotherhood win elections in Egypt in the wake of last year's ouster of president Hosni Mubarak after 18 days of massive street protests.

"I want to be clear that the United States is not in the business, in Egypt, of choosing winners and losers, even if we could, which, of course, we cannot," Clinton said at the opening of the consulate.”


And what about the Monica Lewinsky taunts, Hillary?

Just another right-wing conspiracy?

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/monica-monica-chants-taunt-clinton-egypt-191217298.html

14.7.12

National Disgrace: Illegal Aliens in Good American Jobs!




By John W. Lillpop


Contrary to a popular stereotype, not all illegal aliens are uneducated, unskilled blokes suitable only for menial labor like picking fruit, serving food in fast food restaurants, cleaning rooms, or operating leaf- blowers.

Indeed, some illegals are properly trained and educated to work in high-technology, construction labor, and other high-paying jobs with benefits.

Without exception, all such people are in jobs that should be filled byAmerican citizens of which there are 23 million whom are presently unemployed, or under employed.

The notion that all illegals are in jobs that Americans simply will not do is self-serving rubbish, promulgated by reckless Democrats and RINOs who could care less about the suffering of citizens, and whom look to imported illegals as a resource for growing the Democrat voter base.

Illegal aliens who are in jobs that would be coveted by unemployed Americans, are guilty of not only violating our borders and established immigration laws, but are also equally guilty of stealing from American families.

This sort of crime should be investigated by the government and the criminal invaders should be deported post haste.

Instead, our “progressive” leaders waste time and American resources to advocate on behalf of illegals who do not belong here,  and to whom nothing is owed by the American people.

Time for Obama to stop pandering to Hispanics and work on behalf of American citizens for a change!



Outrage: Obama “In-Sources” Millions of Illegal Aliens to Compete With Citizens for Jobs!

By John W. Lillpop


While Team Obama tries to make an issue over the alleged “out-sourcing” of American jobs by Mitt Romney, scant little attention is being paid to Barack Obama’s despicable pandering to Hispanics, which includes “in-sourcing” of illegal aliens to fill American jobs.

In his latest circumvention of Congress and the Constitution with respect to illegal aliens, not only did Obama shield certain invaders from deportation, but the Obama scheme even rewards invaders with work permits.

Thus, armed with Obama-issued work permits, young illegal aliens can now escape the awful shadows that plague foreign invaders whom are fugitives of the law.

All of which frees non-citizens to compete openly with American citizens in an economy where 23 million people are either unemployed or under employed!

True, many of the jobs are low-paying, and without benefits.

Still, college students and many other low-income American citizens deserve to be considered for those jobs without competition from invaders!

In addition, of the 12-30 million foreign invaders squatting unchallenged in America, there are surely millions who occupy modest to high paying jobs that would be highly coveted by unemployed or underemployed citizens!

Why is the Obama administration not tracking down such menaces and deporting them for the very serious crime of taking opportunity away citizens?

Bottom Line: Barack Obama needs to focus on jobs for American citizens!, rather than his idiotic program to “In source” foreign illegals to compete with citizens!

Can America Survive Another 190 Days of Obama?



By John W. Lillpop



One of the few remaining daily thrills in my shallow life is visiting Canada Free Press and eyeing the “Countdown until Obama leaves Office” feature, celebrating the slow, but steady, ticking off of the number of days until Barack Obama is removed from office!

The “Magic Number” stands at 190 as of this morning. Which is just a few days more than six months!

Piece of cake, no?  Surely we and our Constitutional Republic can survive six more months of insufferable abuse at the hands of an ego-maniac, Marxist gone berserk?

Think about it: Six months ago, we were in January.

Seems like only yesterday we were toasting the start of a new year and making stupid resolutions, all of which were gone with the wind within a matter of days, or even hours.

Surely, we the greatest people on earth can survive six more months of torture and fascist mandates?

Hmmm.

On second thought, six months is more than enough time to inflict permanent, irreparable, damage to our Constitution and way of life.

Especially when government is headed by a man who hates America, and the traditions and laws that make us who we are.

A man whom is committed to fundamental transformation of the greatest society is human history!

A president whom 56 percent of Americans believe has, indeed, changed America, but for the worse, as reported at Reference 1:

In the wake of the Supreme Court decision to uphold Obamacare, more than two-thirds of Americans believe the country has changed significantly under President Obama, but a majority believe it’s not for the better. That negative perception extends to even a significant chunk of voters in the president's own party, according to a new poll out Tuesday.

According to the new survey from the Hill, 1 in 5 self-identified Democrats said that the country has changed for the worse during the Obama administration. Overall, 56 percent of all likely voters see the changes to the country since Obama took office as negative, versus just 35 percent who view them positively
.
Unfortunately, Barack Obama can do one hell of a lot of damage in just six months.

For example, his performance over the past six months includes these outrages:

( )Suspension of religious freedom by requiring that contraception and abortion services be offered by certain religious institutions even when those services run counter to basic religious beliefs;

( )Misuse of Executive Orders as Obama did when he ignored the law, Congress, and the Constitution by decreeing that certain illegal aliens be granted amnesty from deportation;

( )Misuse of Executive Privilege as when Obama perpetuated the cover-up of the Fast and Furious scandal involving proliferation of dangerous arms to drug cartels in Mexico, which cost a US Border Patrol agent and an unknown number of Mexican citizens their lives.

On and on the list goes.

The point is that President Obama has nothing but disdain for American rule of law and, since he cannot achieve the change he lusts for legislatively, in accord with the Constitution, he uses dictatorial fiat to impose his Marxist will on an unwilling governed!

Whatever happened to the consent of the people, Mr. President? Old school, no doubt?

Bottom Line: Unless Congress and the several states are able to combine forces and somehow prevent Barack Hussein Obama from decimating our Constitutional structure and rule of law, our blessed America may NOT survive, at least not in any recognizable form.

One does not wish to overreact. However, the next six months are likely to be the most turbulent and untoward in our history.

Remember: If Mitt Romney is elected, America will be stuck with a lame-duck, embittered President Obama whom will have 60 plus days in which to transform America according to his will.

Pray for America.

Pray that as of January 20, 2013, America IS still a Constitutional Republic and that responsible, common sense, Constitutional government takes over.

Ref 1 http://slatest.slate.com/posts/2012/07/10/hill_poll_majority_think_obama_changed_country_for_worse_.html





13.7.12

Mitt Romney: Felon, Liar, or Both?

By John W. Lillpop



Barack Obama’s reputation as a cool, calm, and collected intellectual who is above the fray of dirty politics may have sprung a huge leak as the 2012 election campaign nears the brutal “dog days” of summer.

Going in, everyone knew that the election would be bitterly contested, a no- holds barred, hand-to-hand war between two very different  ideologies and views.

However, whom would have imagined that the level of slime would get so out of control so early?

Team Obama started the week of sewer politics with an attack that left voters pondering the question: Is Mitt Romney a felon, liar, or both?

Some choice!

As reported at the reference, Team Obama went after Romney with spikes high and clenched fists targeted below the belt:
Mitt Romney either lied in federal filings that show he worked at Bain Capital through 2002 and could be guilty of a felony, or has lied to the American people in saying he left the company in 1999, the Obama campaign is arguing in light of news reports on the firm’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

“This is serious business,” said Bob Bauer, the Obama campaign’s counsel, in a conference call for reporters coming after the Boston Globe published a story Thursday that calls into question the timeline of Romney’s involvement of the firm that the Republican candidate has been promulgating for years.

Deputy campaign manager Stephanie Cutter laid out the issue as the Obama team sees it: “Either Mitt Romney, through his own words and his own signature, was misrepresenting his position at Bain to the SEC, which is a felony.”

“Or,” she said, “he was misrepresenting his position at Bain to the American people to avoid responsibility for some of the consequences of his investments,” including layoffs and the outsourcing of jobs."
From the Romney corner, as reported at Ref 2:
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney did a hastily arranged series of interviews on national television Friday in an attempt to stem the political damage from a week-long barrage of attacks from President Obama and his reelection campaign suggesting he has lied to the American public about when he left the helm of Bain Capital.
In interviews with five television networks, Romney called the attacks undignified and demanded an apology from Obama.

“I think this kind of statement from the Obama team is really shocking. It’s ridiculous and it’s beneath the dignity of the presidency,” he told CBS News. “… But what [Obama] wants to do is try and divert any attention from his lack of success, and frankly, it’s beneath the dignity of his office. He ought to apologize for what he’s doing.”
Perhaps Obama should turn the entire matter over to his in-contempt-of Congress Attorney General, Eric Holder, for a fair and balanced investigation?

Meanwhile, the US economy slithers closer to a second recession, Muslim Brotherhood fanatics take over Egypt and perhaps Libya, massacre becomes the national pastime in Syria, and America pursues a relentless march toward the tax Armageddon due to hit on 1/1/2013.



And the beat goes on…..



Ref 1
http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/07/obama-team-romney-committed-a-felony-or-lied-to-voters-128757.html

Ref 2
http://nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/romney-strikes-back-against-bain-attacks-20120713



NAACP Leaders: Whither Barack?



                                                                Snubbs the NAACP!




By John W. Lillpop

Last month, President Obama was roundly criticized for failing to show up in Wisconsin to campaign for the recall of Governor Scott Walker in his huge dispute with public sector labor unions.

“Too busy” was the official explanation at the time, although Obama found plenty of time for fund raising appearances.

This month this prez is raising eyebrows for his no-show at the NAACP convention which was addressed by Republican Mitt Romney.

Whither Barack, is the cry in Houston.

As reported at the reference, this time it is a “Scheduling Conflict” which is keeping the first black president in US History from appearing before a constituency of supporters who come down on his side 90-95 percent of the problem.

Perhaps that overwhelming support is, itself, the problem?

Specifically, in the cold, brutal world of competitive national politics it may be considered imprudent for Obama to “waste” valuable time and energy in appearing before a gathering of folks already solidly in his camp.

In other words, Obama may be taking the Black Vote for granted!

Naturally, some black folks are feeling jilted as reported at the reference in part:

HOUSTON, Texas — The black leaders that attended the NAACP Convention here Thursday heaped praise on Vice President Joe Biden for a heated morning speech, but one question quietly pervaded the gathering: Where was President Obama?

Obama's decision to skip the annual convention in the heat of his re-election bid has been a point of constant speculation here in recent days, providing a sort of microcosm for how the black community views the nation's first African-American president as he nears the end of his first term.

"The people here overwhelmingly supported President Obama, would have loved to have President Obama here. So there's definitely some disappointment about that," said Dedrick Muhammad, director of the NAACP's Economic Department.

Convention organizers said the president's office cited a "scheduling conflict" as the reason he couldn't attend. (Obama spent today in Washington D.C., and has no major public events.) And the president did make an effort to ensure the convention that he hadn't forgotten them, appearing in a brief, pre-taped video praising the organization that aired before Biden's address.

But one former Obama administration official noted to BuzzFeed that the move looked like a snub.

"Even considering the politics here, it seems odd that the first African-American President is sending his vice president to address the NAACP national convention in an election year," the official said.

Most of the convention's audience, comprised of black civic leaders, business owners, and community activists, were reluctant to criticize Obama to the press, even as they complained about his neglect off the record — a reflection of a sense of protectiveness among many African-Americans, and an understanding that Obama must at times disappoint.

Alvin Chambliss, a retired law professor at Texas Southern University and lifelong members of the NAACP, blamed Obama's advisers — particularly Valerie Jarrett — for his decision not to show up, echoing a common complaint here about the people in the president's inner circle. Chambliss, who called the president's absence "a downer," said Jarrett is too afraid of Obama becoming defined by his race, and has led him to take his African-American supporters for granted.

"I don't think there's anyone around the president who's really, truly from the black community," Chambliss said. "We have to re-elect him, but I pray that his second term will be different from his first term."

Chambliss went on to say he "long[ed] for the day when the NAACP will be an organization where every president, whether Republican or Democrat, would come because there would be punitive damages for not coming. But today is obviously not that day."

"We can give him a pass," Chambliss concluded. "But to say it was a scheduling conflict, that's bull. At the end of the day, it's the NAACP; you schedule stuff around them. You're supposed to know when there's a convention, and you're supposed to come."


As to Chambliss’s longing for the day when ” NAACP will be an organization where every president, whether Republican or Democrat, would come because there would be punitive damages for not coming,” --that day will come when the NAACP is seen as more than a political special interest owned and operated by and for the Democrat Party!


Why not start the process, Mr. Chambliss,by revoking that “Pass” to Obama for his recent snub?



http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/obamas-absence-the-talk-of-naacp-convention

12.7.12

Beware Another Obama "Executive Order"—Most Extreme October Surprise Imaginable!



By John W. Lillpop

To date, President Obama has been unable to escape Mitt Romney. Indeed, the scrappy Romney has mounted a respectable challenge and has a pretty good chance of defeating the incumbent.

That may cause Obama to reach into his Magic Hat and pull out a rabbit named Amnesty to lure illegal aliens into the voting booth on November 6.

Imagine the scene: Obama decides that the 12-30 million illegal aliens in America need to be delivered from the "shadows" post haste—just in time to vote for... himself, who else?

Do not be overly surprised if Obama breaks yet another promise and signs an Executive Order which pardons ALL illegal aliens for violating US borders and immigration laws, and which establishes each and every one 18 years and older as a voting-eligible citizen!

What about those with felony convictions and other naughty things in their backgrounds?

There ya go again, Lillpop, groveling around in the slime of racism, racial profiling, and immigrant bashing!

For the sake of the greater good, forget the tawdry details.. liberty beckons for the millions of good-heated, hard-working folks who deserve a break!

Make them legal NOW and let the paperwork catch up AFTER the election!

What about Congress you ask?

In fact, Congress has had years to act, but to date has done NADA!

In the name of fundamental fairness and Democratic order, the only questions illegal aliens should be asked are:

Do you speak Spanish?

Do you love Barack Obama?, and

Do you agree to NEVER vote Republican, with unalterable and immediate deportation the penalty for violation?

Those three questions, answered in the affirmative, should be more than enough to franchise the poor disenfranchised illegal alien demographic in an act of corruption that would leave even Mexican politicians in awe!

SI to illegal aliens, NO to voter integrity!

It's the Obama way!

 

 

 

Mitt Romney’s Quiet Dignity







By John W. Lillpop



Mitt Romney wandered into the lion’s den in Houston to address the NAACP on Wednesday. The candidate immediately threw red meat to the African-American crowd when he promised to repeal ObamaCare and cut non-essential spending.

The lions reacted with a lusty chorus of boos that caused Romney to pause for 15 seconds, after which he resumed explaining why African-Americans would be better served by a Romney presidency, rather than extension of the Obama administration.

Boos can unsettle even the most experienced public speaker, but Romney maintained his composure, and once the boos subsided, was back on message--unwavering in his commitments to fixing America, including the huge problems that confront African-Americans, such as the 14.2 percent unemployment rate that plagues this community.

Throughout his speech, Romney remained cool and calm. His quiet dignity and respect made the candidate appear “Presidential,” and ready to roll up his sleeves and go to work for all Americans.

The big question: Did Romney win over any hearts and minds that will translate into votes come November?

Probably not, but his quiet dignity should be a strong antidote to Democrat ads which seek to portray him as an elitist white guy interested only in protecting the wealthy.

Clearly, Mitt Romney is a respectful, knowledgeable man who understands economic principles and private enterprise.

Even the most ardent Obama supporter should at least listen to what he has to say!

11.7.12

Breathtaking Hypocrisy: NAACP Requires ID to Hear Eric Holder Speak Against Voter ID!



By John W. Lillpop



Hypocrisy, thou be the NAACP!

That was illustrated by NAACP actions surrounding a speech delivered by Eric Holder, America’s in -contempt-of-Congress Attorney General, before the NAACP on Tuesday.

In that speech, Holder defended his aggressive assault against Voter ID laws that require would-be voters to produce identification. Voter ID laws are intended to protect against voter fraud; however, Holder and the NAACP see the laws as racist moves to prevent people-of-color from voting.

As reported at the reference, Holder slammed state laws that would require individuals to present photo identification to vote:
"In our efforts to protect voting rights and to prevent voting fraud, we will be vigilant and strong," Holder said at the NAACP convention in Houston. "But let me be clear: We will not allow political pretexts to disenfranchise American citizens of their most precious right."


He said voter ID laws, such as one proposed in Texas that his Justice Department is fighting, are "harmful to minority voters," who may be unable to travel to or afford to obtain suitable identification.”

However, reporters wishing to attend Holder’s speech in person were told to bring a government-issued photo identification as well as a credential from their organization when checking in to hear Holder’s speech.

As reported at Townhall.com:
Earlier today, Attorney General Eric Holder addressed the NAACP Nation Convention at the George R. Brown Convention Center in Houston, Texas. What did media need in order to attend? That's right, government issued photo identification (and a second form of identification too!), something both Holder and the NAACP stand firmly against when it comes to voting. Holder's DOJ is currently suing Texas for "discriminatory" voter ID laws. From the press release:
All media must present government-issued photo I.D. (such as a driver’s license) as well as valid media credentials. Members of the media must RSVP to receive press credentials at http://action.naacp.org/page/s/registration. For security purposes, media check-in and equipment set up must be completed by 7:45 a.m. CDT for an 8:00 a.m. CDT security sweep. Once the security sweep is completed, additional media equipment will NOT be permitted to enter and swept equipment will NOT be permitted to exit.

Ironically, NAACP President Ben Jealous railed against voter ID just before Holder took the stage.


The head of the NAACP on Monday likened the group's fight against conservative-backed voter ID laws that have been passed in several states to the great civil rights battles of the 1960s.
Benjamin Todd Jealous, the CEO and president of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, said these are "Selma and Montgomery times," referring to historic Alabama civil rights confrontations. He challenged those attending the NAACP's annual convention to redouble their efforts to get out the vote in November.”
"We must overwhelm the rising tide of voting suppression”


Breathtaking hypocrisy! Or unimaginable stupidity?

Both?



http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/07/10/conservative-website-raises-stir-over-id-check-at-holder-event/






















10.7.12

With Murders Soaring, Windy City Needs Experienced Community Organizer!




By John W. Lillpop


The soaring rate of murders in Chicago is proving too onerous for Da Mayor, the –less- than- honorable, Rahm Emanuel.

As reported at the reference, Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel has failed to bring the spirit of Hope and Change with him from the White House:
“CHICAGO (AP) — Chicago's mayor and police superintendent publicly defended their new gang-fighting strategy Monday amid growing criticism that the changes are failing and a big reason why the city's homicide rate has soared this year.
After weeks of media reports about Chicago homicides — which so far are up nearly 38 percent from last year — Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Police Superintendent Garry McCarthy defiantly said during a news conference that the gang strategies in place before McCarthy arrived were the ones that failed, not the new ones.”

Clearly, Emanuel has learned a vital lesson from Obama: Blame all that is untoward on the previous administration!

Da Mayor clearly needs a community organizer with experience to step in and take back the streets and alleys of Chicago.

By coincidence, one of the most experienced and storied community organizers in the world will be on the hunt for employment starting November 7.

His name is Barack Obama and with his background in Democrat politics, he would be perfectly qualified to deal with murderers, gangsters, and other thugs. And he is good at basketball.

Barack Obama as Community Organizer for Chicago—has a nice ring to it, say what?



http://news.yahoo.com/homicides-spike-chicago-mayor-defends-tactics-004217621.html

8.7.12

Latest Crock from Chris Rock: Independence Day Is “White Peoples Day”



Happy Independence Day to ALL!






By John W. Lillpop

How is it that millions of people from around the globe are so desperate to get into America to partake of our bountiful liberty and opportunities, that many will risk life and limb just to get in, even unlawfully, while some native-born American residents whom have attained tremendous fame and fortune see nothing but evil and racism in all that is US culture and history?

Indeed, why would any person of color come here willingly given the anti-American propaganda proliferated by people like black comedian Chris Rock?

Yet, come they do, by the millions.

Rock is a perfect example of ungrateful hypocrisy on steroids: He reportedly has a dowry of approximately $70 million dollars, yet he continues to throw hate speech bombs at America and our founding fathers, while also ridiculing white people in general.

Rock has discovered one of the many secrets to wealth in America: Hate speech, steeped in racism sells!  

Provided one caters to malcontent haters, that is.

The latest crock from Rock as reported at Reference 1:

The White People's Day Twitter message from Chris Rock on July 4 has fueled a hot debate on Independence Day, slavery and racism. While many are outraged at the Fourth of July tweet, the stand-up comic is getting support from bloggers and media sources.

In an ABC News report Friday, the outlet suggested that Rock's tweet went up in flames faster than the San Diego botched fireworks show.

"Happy white peoples independence day the slaves weren't free but I’m sure they enjoyed fireworks."

Rock took to Twitter and lightheartedly called Independence Day a holiday for white people.”


Folks like Chris Rock refuse to look beyond the tragic early chapters in American history, while bitterly refusing to acknowledge that the principles set forth by the white founders established the framework for rectifying inhumane practices like slavery, which was abolished by a white president in 1863.

Does the Emancipation Proclamation ring a bell, Chris?

Again, that document was crafted by white people for the benefit of African-Americans.

But perhaps it is more profitable to dwell on slavery and other discrimination suffered by blacks?

Consider this: Where else but in America would a nation fight a civil war to eradicate evil imposed on a powerless and penniless minority? And elect a member of that minority as President of the US?

Which is not to discount the misery and humiliation that slavery brought to African-Americans.

It is to say that people like Chris Rock owe the Founding Fathers an expression of gratitude for the prosperity with which they are blessed.

Especially on Independence Day.

Time to knock that chip off your shoulder and join in the celebration of the greatest nation in human history, Chris!

In other words, Chris, although you are not white you have much to be grateful for on Independence Day, and are most welcome to join in the celebrations!

Simply  stated: Happy Independence Day, Chris Rock!



Ref: http://www.examiner.com/article/white-people-s-day-chris-rock-attracts-blogger-media-support


7.7.12

Obama Reaction to Dismal Jobs Report: “Step in the Right Direction”



Out of Touch Elitist! 


By John W. Lillpop

As the pressures of the presidential election campaign grow more and more intense, President Obama has crafted a means for shielding himself from bad news of the type which might reflect on his performance:

It’s called denial.

For instance, the June employment numbers show that the US economy added only 80,000 new jobs, while the unemployment rate persisted at 8.2%.

Most people blessed with “genius” intelligence, as Obama allegedly is, would conclude that the June report reflects very bad news about the economy and the lack of positive momentum on the jobs front.

However, America’s genius -in –chief somehow saw good news in the reports.

As reported at the reference, Obama said the following:



President Obama, at his second campaign stop Friday following a dismal June jobs report, dropped a line from his speech in which he cited the faint job growth as a "step in the right direction."

The president had taken heat for the comment from both the Mitt Romney campaign and Republican National Committee.
"Seriously?" Romney spokeswoman Andrea Saul said in an email earlier that drew attention to the remark. She noted the 80,000 jobs recorded in June are far below the 130,000 to 150,000 it takes to keep pace with population growth.

This “step in the right direction” faux pas comes on the heels of Obama’s “the private sector is fine” boo-boo after the May report was issued.

Good grief, Mr. President, 23 million Americans are unemployed or under employed and adding 80,000 jobs is a step in the right direction?

Direction to what, sir? The fate of Greece? Spain? Italy?

With nonsensical public remarks like these, Obama is giving credence to those who claim he is an out-of-touch elitist who is in severe denial, and incapable of tending to the economy.

In Obama’s mind, there is NO problem. Rather, the angst and fear are products of right-wing extremists who are distorting the facts in order to harm Obama.

Sorry sir, but there are 23 million Americans whose lives are on hold while you deny the truth.

Some of those 23 million will vote in November. Many will vote to replace our out-of-touch elitist with a man whose business credential are “sterling,” according to another well-known Democrat.

Perhaps the gut-wrenching reality of unemployment will finally make it to Obama’s consciousness on November 7, the day after Mitt Romney is elected US president 45?


Reference http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/07/06/obama-drops-line-calling-job-growth-tep-in-right-direction/#ixzz1zxnJgIIE