Amnesty Will Add Tens of Millions of Assimilation-phobic Foreigners to Democrat Party!

By John W. Lillpop

RINOs such as Lindsay Graham, John McCain, and Marco Rubio justify their support for invaders who have violated our borders and ignored our laws with the notion that, once invaders are legalized through amnesty, they will be so grateful for the GOP welcome mat AND so impressed with the conservative agenda that they will flock to the Republican Party by the millions, leaving the Democrats and their tawdry entitlements like food stamps, welfare, and other bribes, in the dust.

Good luck with that, you RINO weasels!

Fact of the matter is that those whom become legal through amnesty will, when able to vote, support the politicians who keep the gravy train going—that would be the Democrats!

Unless Messrs. Graham, McCain, and Rubio are willing to extend entitlements to former invaders with the same robust disregard for economic reality as Democrats! It will take that to maintain any sort of loyalty from illegals converted to citizens.

As to the preservation of American culture and language, RINOs are stunningly naïve!

Fact is, most illegals are assimilation-phobic socialists who come here not for freedom and liberty, but rather for the dollars and cents! The tax-payer funded booty, mate!

Just as we Americans are convinced that our culture and language is superior, so it is that the Mexican invader believes that Spanish and Mexican culture are superior to the American way of life.

Which is why they hesitate in great numbers to assimilate into American culture.

Thus, the only thing that amnesty will do is add tens of millions of Assimilation-phobic Foreigners to the Democrat Party!

And why would any conservative want to do that?

Convict George Zimmerman Just to Keep Peace on the Streets?

By John W. Lillpop

An all-female jury has been selected to hear the trial of George Zimmerman to decide if his killing of Trayvon Martin was an act of second-degree murder as prosecutors claim, or as Zimmerman contends, was in self defense and permitted by the Stand by Your Ground Law in Florida.

Because of the racial implications, aroused by the media and the likes of Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, the jury’s verdict could have far-reaching effects throughout the nation.

As reported at the reference:

Following a number of tweets making threats to kill white people if George Zimmerman is acquitted of murdering Trayvon Martin, a former Chicago police officer warns that the outcome of the case could spark race riots in cities across America.

As Infowars reported yesterday, following the woeful performance of Rachel Jeantel, the state’s so-called “star witness,” a number of Twitter users took to the social network to express their intention to kill white people in retaliation for Zimmerman going free.
Tweets included remarks such as “If Zimmerman get off ima shoot the first #hispanic/white I see,” and “If they don’t kill Zimmerman Ima kill me a cracka.”

In an article entitled, America Will See Its Worst Race Riot Yet This Summer, Crime File News’ Paul Huebl remarks that the case against Zimmerman should never have been filed in the first place and that when the trial inevitably collapses with Zimmerman’s acquittal, “I fully expect organized race rioting to begin in every major city to dwarf the Rodney King and the Martin Luther King riots of past decades.”

Huebl is a licensed private detective and a former Chicago police officer.

“If you live in a large city be prepared to evacuate or put up a fight to win. You will need firearms, fire suppression equipment along with lots of food and water. Police resources will be slow and outgunned everywhere,” writes Huebl, adding, “America may see some combat related population control like we’ve not seen since the Civil War. Martial Law can’t be far behind complete with major efforts at gun grabbing.”

Huebl is not the only prominent voice to express fears that the outcome of the trial could lead to widespread social disorder.

Columnist and former senior presidential advisor Pat Buchanan warned last month that, “The public mind has been so poisoned that an acquittal of George Zimmerman could ignite a reaction similar to that, 20 years ago, when the Simi Valley jury acquitted the LAPD cops in the Rodney King beating case.”

Political Strategist Charles D. Ellison also warns that, “There is the risk of a flash point as intense as the aftermath of that fateful Los Angeles police brutality verdict in 1992,” if Zimmerman walks free.

“At that time, many underestimated the potential for social unrest. And a bit over 20 years to the date, many could be making the same miscalculation at this very moment. The ingredients are there in Sanford and they loom large nationally, from an economy barely managing its own recovery to an unemployment rate that’s much higher than it should be, particularly for African-Americans,” adds Ellison.

Some are even asking whether the law should be ignored and Zimmerman convicted simply to avoid race riots.

“Regardless of whether or not Zimmerman acted in self defense, a large segment of the population, particularly the black population, are demanding Zimmerman be punished. And if they don’t have their demands satisfied, it is possible they might riot,” writes a poster at the Aesops Retreat forum. “So would it be appropriate to consider potential riots when deciding on whether or not to prosecute Zimmerman? Or should justice be blind and follow the rule of law?”

Critics of the attempt to convict Zimmerman have cited numerous points of evidence which clearly suggest Zimmerman acted in self-defense and that the case against him was built largely on the back of contrived racial politics.”

Have we reached the point where convicting an innocent man just to calm racial emotions is even a possibility?



Vote Tally from US Senate: Mexico 68, USA 32!

By John W. Lillpop

In keeping with the long-standing tradition of the Democrat party, the United States Senate today surrendered American sovereignty, culture, and language to third-world Mexico.

The vote was 68 for Mexico, 32 for America. Several Republicans turncoats joined the Democrats in voting against America.

Amnesty now heads for the US House where Speaker John Boehner can save the Republic by engineering a rejection of the Senate maddness.

Boehner CAN save America. But WILL he?

Time to Let Paula Deen Catch Her Breath!

By John W. Lillpop

Paula Deen, former celebrity chef turned national racist and now THE whipping girl for America’s neurotic mainstream media, needs to stop weeping and apologizing for the ONE TIME she used the N-word!

By the way, does anyone really believe that this flower of the south slipped just once? Of course not! Like many folks, she probably used the N-word without even thinking about it.


Abraham Lincoln, the man erroneously credited with freeing the slaves, used the N word, more than once, and was a strong advocate for shipping slaves back to Africa, or elsewhere, where they might pursue “happiness” and all of the other blessings of our Declaration of Independence without creating a fuss among white folk.

And Father Abe could not cook anything more sophisticated than a boiled egg, much less a Skillet Fried Apple Pie for which Deen is renowned!

More recently, Harry S Truman, our 33rd President, used the N-word openly and without particular shame. However, Truman was responsible for integrating the armed services of the US and was a strong proponent of civil rights.

Of course the N word is humiliating and should never be used.

But people do make mistakes…however, it is NOT THE END OF THE WORLD IF, NOW AND AGAIN, THE N-WORD crosses the lips of an otherwise decent fellow or lady!

Far more damaging to the plight of black folk is the tyranny of progressives who push entitlements in order to enslave people of color to the whims of big government.

In fact, blacks should be marching against the E-word—entitlements-- pushed by the likes of President Obama, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi!


The Constitutional Right to Drive Drunk While Brown and Illegal (DDWBI!

By John W. Lillpop

Democrats desperate for votes have gone to new lows in their quest for Immigration Reform, more precisely known as Amnesty.

As reported at the reference, a single DUI conviction will not keep an invader out of America. Two DUIs are still OK. Even three!

More than three DUIs, however, causes your drunken posterior to be sent to Janet Napolitano, Queen of the Newly Arrived Refugees wing of the Democrat Party, and Permanent Chair of the national Illegal Alien Alcoholic Anonymous Sanctuary.

Napolitano will refer qualified drunks to tax-payer funded rehab services. Qualified means the drunk will never vote Republican upon, threat of immediate deportation.

The drivel from the Senate reads as follows:

The Senate immigration bill as it currently stands will allow an illegal alien with two convictions “for driving under the influence or driving while intoxicated” to be granted legal status in this country.

If the alien is not then convicted of a third DUI after passage of the bill and before he is naturalized, he will remain eligible to eventually become a U.S. citizen.

And, even if an alien has been convicted of three or more DUIs, the bill allows the secretary of homeland security to waive the 2-DUI limit for illegal aliens seeking legalization if she believes it is “for humanitarian purposes, to ensure family unity, or if such a waiver is otherwise in the public interest.”

The bill brands an alien as a “habitual drunk driver” only after the alien has incurred three DUIs.

However, each of these three DUI convictions must be for an offense that happened on a separate date. Thus, theoretically, if an illegal alien were caught driving under the influence at 12:01 a.m one day, then went home and slept it off, then went out and got caught for driving under the influence again at 11:59 p.m. on the same day, he would only be counted as having one DUI under the Senate immigration bill.

The Senate Judiciary Committee’s summary of the bill put it this way:

"Section 3702. Banning habitual drunk drivers from the United States

“This section renders inadmissible and deportable any alien convicted of three offenses occurring on separate dates related to driving under the influence or driving while intoxicated. For deportation, at least one of the convictions must occur post-enactment. Further, the section makes conviction for a third drunk driving offense an aggravated felony. The provision takes effect on the date of enactment of the bill. It applies only if one of the convictions takes place after enactment of the bill.”

Pages 251-253 of Title III of the Corker-Hoeven amended text of the Senate bill (the “Interior Enforcement” section) spells out an illegal alien’s presumed right to get at least two DUIs (on separate dates) and still be legalized.

The bill says that an alien is “inadmissible” if he or she has already been convicted of at least 3 DUIs that happened on separate dates and is “deportable” if he or she had two DUI convictions before passage of the immigration-reform bill and then went out and got a third DUI conviction after passage of the bill.”

There you go: Another enticement to grow the Democrat Party at the expense of responsible citizens!

Ref: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/senate-bill-will-legalize-illegal-aliens-who-have-2-duis#sthash.gyU7Q6Be.dpuf

Obama Gay Marriage “Evolution” Just in Time for Victory Lap!

By John W. Lillpop

President Barack Obama may be a corrupt, never-do-well, evil-doer, but give him credit: He is the luckiest fellow to occupy the Oval Office in some time.

Take for example his personal stance on gay marriage. Remember that, until May 9 of 2012, The One was opposed to same-sex couples tying the knot. He said so often and consistently.

But the Goddess of Evolution apparently decided that The One was dithering far too long on an issue of monumental import to the American way of life.She thus nudged our Community Organizer into acting just a few months before the national elections!

The One was now able to claim disenchanted gay citizens as solid, contributing constituency!

Fast forward to June 26, 2013 where the SCOTUS has just announced a historic ruling which overturns the DOMA act!

Quite coincidentally, the One was on MSNBC doing an interview when the event was instantly transformed into a victory lap for the “evolved president” as shown at the You tube video where he offered congratulations to gay folks now on their way to a lifetime of bliss:


As reported at the reference, "it was a nice stroke of luck for MSNBC today during its coverage of the Supreme Court’s decisions rejecting the federal Defense of Marriage Act and essentially overturning California’s Proposition 8 that prevented same-sex couples from marrying in the state. President Obama interrupted the live interview with a phone call from Air Force One to offer congratulations.”

To say nothing of the serendipity that blessed the One just one year after his dramatic evolution!

What luck!


Gist of SCOTUS Voter Discrimination Ruling: Enough Is Enough!

By John W. Lillpop

In acting to tone down the Federal Government’s over reach in implementing the voting rights act of 1965, the SCOTUS echoed the feelings of millions of ordinary Americans: Enough is enough!

After five decades , the time has come to level the playing field--- in the other direction.

The ruling correctly recognizes the significant progress that has been made while acknowledging that more remains to be done.

What better time to rethink the issues than now? After all, our African-American President is starting his second four-year term in office: Proof positive that dramatic change is in place, and that American states no longer need to be bullied about like school kids.

Time for minority communities to stand on their own merits as well. Having a sugar daddy in Washington, D.C. is sweet, but independence and freedom is even more so.

Hail be to the SCOTUS for nudging America in the right direction on this vital issue!


Amnesty All About Green Backs for Wet Backs!

By John W. Lillpop

A wise man once advised those seeking the truth to, “Follow the money.”

That admonition certainly applies to the current debate over amnesty for tens of millions of invading criminals.

It all boils down to large corporations looking for cheap labor and the Democrat party looking to buy voters with taxpayer money.

In other words, amnesty is all about green backs for wet backs!

SCOTUS Renders Sane Ruling on Voter Discrimination: Take THAT, Eric Holder!

By John W. Lillpop

A sure sign that the Supreme Court ruling on the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is the correct decision and is otherwise in the best interests of all Americans can be gleaned from the reaction of President Obama.

The One is reported to be “deeply disappointed” by the ruling. What else would one expect from an incompetent president who uses racial division at every opportunity in poltical wars?

As reported at the reference:

“The Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that states can no longer be judged by voting discrimination that went on decades ago, in a decision that marks the end of a major civil-rights era reform.

The 5-4 ruling rewrites a key tool of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which for five decades has given the federal government unprecedented say in everything from how some states draw their congressional maps to where they place polling locations.”

One can hope that this will put Attorney General Eric Holder back in his box and keep the Contemptible One from opposing photo ID and other sane procedures designed to guard against voter fraud.

Finally, a victory for the people!

Read more: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jun/25/court-past-voting-discrimination-no-longer-held/#ixzz2XFXHqKRE
Follow us: @washtimes on Twitter

Chuck Schumer Makes Case for NOT Granting Citizenship to Invading Criminals!

By John W. Lillpop

Senator Schumer(D-NY) issued an extraordinary warning to Americans who still believe in the rule of law, American sovereignty, and Democracy in general.

Schumer warned that “if there’s no path to citizenship (in the Amnesty Bill) I could see a million people on the Mall in Washington."

Whoa! A million illegal aliens in the mall, Senator?

Seems to this reporter that Schumer is making an excellent argument which holds that the illegal alien crowd he wants to reward for crimes is NOT WORTHY of anything save immediate deportation!

Good grief, Senator, why should America bend over backwards to accommodate millions of foreign invaders who have ignored our borders and laws and who cost American taxpayers $113 billion a year, and who have such a distorted understanding of what living in a Democracy and being American means?

Illegal aliens who believe that they can use civil unrest to get their way are clearly not the sort of people whom America should be welcoming into the nation.

And, despite the best efforts of Barack Obama and progressive stooges like Charles Schumer, America still remains a nation of law and order.

Put simply: We do not need millions of invaders who will resort to civil unrest if their selfish demands are not met.

Fire up the deportation engines, Mate. Let’s ship the malcontents out—in a Southerly direction!


Man Arrested for Waving Confederate Flag!

By John W. Lillpop

This story must not reach the eyes or ears of J.D. Longstreet before he can be debriefed.

Longstreet a man of the South and dedicated conservative might be difficult to manage after reading the following story from Reference 1:

CAMDEN, N.J. (AP) — Authorities say a man attending a Toby Keith concert in New Jersey's most impoverished city climbed a fence into a housing complex, waved a Confederate flag and shouted racial slurs at residents.

33-year-old Darren Walp of Ridley Park, Pa., was arrested in Camden Saturday. He's charged with bias intimidation, harassment and criminal trespassing and is in the Camden County Jail with bail of $5,000.

Walp was arrested Saturday evening in the crowd at the Susquehanna Bank Center. The concert venue is near the Royal Court apartments in a city where most residents are minorities.

Camden County Police Chief Scott Thomson says he's asking the United States Attorney's Office to review the case and possibly take over the prosecution.

It was not immediately clear if Walp had a lawyer.”

God Bless the Confederate Flag, JD Longstreet, and Darren Walp, sans the slurs!

Ref: http://www.myfoxny.com/Story/22669886/man-accused-of-bias-intimidation-at-concert#ixzz2X9webxzj

Breaking News: Not All Illegal Aliens Are ‘Good-hearted, Hard-working’!

By John W Lillpop

President George W. Bush never met an illegal alien that he would deport!  W. is famous for describing illegal aliens as ‘good hearted-hard working’ blokes, worthy, in his mangled mind, of citizenship, food stamps, and all of the other booty that comes with the American Dream because---well, because they are allegedly ‘good-hearted, hard working’ and Latino.

Before he issues another blanket endorsement of illegals, W. would do well to consider the foibles of illegal alien Luis de La Garza, well-known former immigration activist now behind bars for robbing 19 banks in Texas.

The full story as reported from the reference:

It's people who believe they have "rights" to things they don't have "rights" to that would do this sort of thing, IMHO. This man has lived here for 10 years....and he began breaking our laws as soon as he came to our country illegally. I guess it becomes easy after that.

"This week Texas FBI captured the prolific bank robber dubbed the “Mesh Mask Bandit” who is tied to at least 19 bank robberies in northern Texas.

Former Latino community leader and immigrants-right advocate, Luis de La Garza has been fingered as the “Mesh Mask Bandit”. He was given that name for the mesh masks he wore to carry out his bank robberies."

De la Garza, a Mexican immigrant, had been very active in immigration issues in Farmers Branch, Texas where he has lived for at least a decade. His Wikipedia page says he was born in Mexico City.

Latino activists he worked with considered him “one of the most dynamic local leaders.” He was admired across the border as well, having been invited to the inauguration of President Felipe Calderon in 2006. He also worked with the administration of former Mexican President Vicente Fox on immigrant advocacy issues.

Reports indicate his legal woes started in 2005 when he pled guilty to failing to file a corporate tax return. Others say it started before that, when he was operating the local Spanish-language TV station and failed to pay his employees. Most recently he was charged with shoplifting over $200 worth of items from a Dallas Wal-Mart.

Today De la Garza is charged with bank robbery and authorities are working on tying him to at least 18 other robberies in North Texas. The robberies were all similar says the FBI – the bandit walks into a bank wearing his trademark mask covering his face, shows a gun to the teller, demands cash and runs off. Authorities believe the first bank heist by the ‘Mesh Mask Bandit’ occurred on New Year’s Eve.

"Meanwhile the Latino community in North Texas is wondering what happened to De La Garza that his ‘immigrant living the American Dream life’ took such a wrong turn.”

Actually, the wrong turn was taken when this thug invaded America and became a resident illegal.

This is the sort of tramp that morons like Marco Rubio and the “Gang of Eight” are fighting for!



Is Obama Intent on Provoking Marshall Law?

By John W. Lillpop

With his evil deeds and actions, President Barack Obama has essentially declared war on America, its people, its laws, and institutions, its sovereignty, and its values.

This president has worked to undermine religious values while expanding the role of abusive government into the lives of all Americans.

He has orchestrated acts of espionage against people and organization with whom he differs ideologically, using powerful instruments of tyranny such as the IRS to target political enemies, defined as anyone with the testicles to identify themselves as patriots or conservative.

He has moved to replace the best health care system in the world with Marxist care that will increase everyone’s costs while driving millions into living without health care.

He has worked feverishly to turn America into a third-world failed state, along the lines of Mexico, by deliberately gutting our laws and endorsing the illegal invasion of America by uneducated peasants, mostly to swell the ranks of the Democrat Party for future elections.

Barack Obama has acted broadly to weaken and disassemble American Exceptionalism, where ever that commodity still exists.

One must wonder: Why is the 44th President of the United States acting as he does?

Perhaps he is striving to create a society of rage and violence that will justify invoking Marshall law.

Is Barack Obama deliberately provoking the American people into a 2nd revolution and or civil are in order to declare Marshall law and thereby stomp out all opposition?


Church Leaders Duplicitous in Pelosi Heresy?

By John W. Lillpop

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), has for years made a mockery of the Catholic Church with statements and behavior that defy the teachings of the Christian church, and which run counter to the admonitions of contemporary Catholic Church leadership.

Pelosi has been a long-standing advocate for both abortion and gay marriage, viewed as sins by most respectful Catholics. She has justified her defiance with bizarre claims that Church teachings on abortion are “unclear,” an assertion that Catholics generally  dismiss as the musing of an confused heretic.

Pelosi has openly expressed her support for gay marriage and even calls her position a “badge of honor.”  More nonsense from a public figure who refuses to reconcile her leftist political views with spiritual teachings of the Church she professes to love.

Adding insult to injury, Pelosi continues to partake of the Holy Communion, a Sacrament meant to signify unity with the principles of Jesus Christ and the Church.

Pelosi’s heresy became more offensive recently when she railed against legislation that would infringe upon what she termed “sacred ground,” how Pelosi views late-term abortion.

To their credit, Catholic Priests for Life denounced Pelosi and stated:

Abortion is not sacred ground; it is sacrilegious ground. To imagine God giving the slightest approval to an act that dismembers a child he created is offensive to both faith and reason.”

Still, the question remains: Why does the Catholic Church allow this fallen follower to discredit and mock the Holy Communion?

As a powerful and influential woman in world affairs, Pelosi sets an atrocious example for millions of young people throughout the world.

By allowing Nancy Pelosi to take Communion, is the Catholic Church not duplicitous in this woman’s heresy?


This Independence Day, Declare America's Freedom from Illegal Invasions!

By John W. Lillpop

Democrats and RINOs who favor open borders (or more precisely, NO borders) and automatic US citizenship for all persons who successfully evade American borders and take up unlawful residency here, are trying to sell yet another amnesty scam to American citizens.

These anti-rule of law tyrants cry out for immediate amnesty without securing the borders-- to help the 11 million “victims” who are being forced to live in the shadows.

Turn coat traitors like Republican Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) take the illegal alien side of the argument against American sovereignty with farcical comments such as:

“We cannot wait another four years with 11 million people living in this country illegally without knowing who they are or why they’re here.”

Begging the good Senator’s pardon, but WHY THE HELL NOT!

After all, Senator, the American people have been waiting 27 years for the federal government to enforce the provisions of the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA), which provided amnesty for about 4 million invaders with the promise that said amnesty would put an end to illegal invasions!

For 27 years, Senator, the American people have witnessed the escalating tsunami of illegal aliens who bring with them unwelcome effects on the cultural, educational, economic, language, and political lives of American citizens.

Quite simply, American citizens being displaced by illegal aliens, Mr. Rubio!

Over the course of the past 27 years, both Democrat and Republican administrations have turned a blind eye to the problems and have refused to act in the best interests of citizens.

So why in the hell is it such a burning priority to grant amnesty to renegades who should not even be here while citizens are still waiting for enforcement of the 1986 IRCA?

Given the fact that our government has adamantly refused to enforce the IRCA, why would any sane politician even consider another amnesty, without even securing the border?

America needs to terminate the out-of-control treadmill that allows criminal invaders to come here and apply pressure for even more amnesty!

Finally, Senator, the definition of amnesty is simple: Any action taken with respect to an illegal alien other than immediate deportation is AMNESTY!

This Fourth of July let’s declare our nation’s independence from the tyranny and unfairness of foreign illegal invasions!


Catholic Priests to Pelosi: Abortion Is Sacreligious, NOT Sacred, Ground!

By John W. Lillpop

In comments made in opposition to a bill in the US House that would ban late term abortions, Rep. Nancy Pelosi(D-CA) railed against legislation that would infringe upon what she termed “sacred ground.” In her pro-baby killing drivel, Pelosi injected her Catholic faith into the fray.

Some Catholic priests were not amused by Pelosi’s illogical rant, as cited at the reference:

Priests for Life slammed House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi in an open letter this week, telling her to “either exercise [her] duties as a public servant and a Catholic, or have the honesty to formally renounce them.”

The harsh words came after Pelosi blasted a reporter for asking the “moral difference” between a late-term abortion and the murder of a viable baby after birth. Pelosi responded, not by answering the question, but by accusing the reporter of having an “agenda” and not being sincerely interested in an answer.

“Public servants are supposed to be able to tell the difference between serving the public and killing the public. Apparently, you can't,” National Director Fr. Frank Pavone wrote.

The last straw for Priests for Life seemed to be Pelosi’s comment during a June 13 press briefing: "As a practicing and respectful Catholic, this is sacred ground to me when we talk about this. I don't think it should have anything to do with politics."

With this statement, you make a mockery of the Catholic faith and of the tens of millions of Americans who consider themselves "practicing and respectful Catholics" and who find the killing of children -- whether inside or outside the womb -- reprehensible.

You speak here of Catholic faith as if it is supposed to hide us from reality instead of lead us to face reality, as if it is supposed to confuse basic moral truths instead of clarify them, and as if it is supposed to help us escape the hard moral questions of life rather than help us confront them.

Whatever Catholic faith you claim to respect and practice, it is not the faith that the Catholic Church teaches. And I speak for countless Catholics when I say that it's time for you to stop speaking as if it were.

Abortion is not sacred ground; it is sacrilegious ground. To imagine God giving the slightest approval to an act that dismembers a child he created is offensive to both faith and reason.

And to say that a question about the difference between a legal medical procedure and murder should not "have anything to do with politics" reveals a profound failure to understand your own political responsibilities, which start with the duty to secure the God-given right to life of every citizen.

Pelosi is not the first Catholic politician to receive criticism from the church for supporting abortion rights, however.

Church leaders have denied or threatened to deny communion to pro-abortion politicians, although the California Democrat said that’s never happened to her: “Fortunately for me, communion has not been withheld and I’m a regular communicant so that would be a severe blow to me if that were the case.”

Pelosi and Vice President Biden were heavily criticized for receiving communion at the mass to celebrate newly-elected Pope Francis. “To receive Christ while rejecting the unborn is a slap in the face to both.”

Whew! That is certainly telling it like it is Mr. Pavone and thank you for doing so!

Pelosi and other politicians who profess to being respectful Catholics while supporting abortion need to heed Pavone’s profound pronouncement:

Abortion is not sacred ground; it is sacrilegious ground. To imagine God giving the slightest approval to an act that dismembers a child he created is offensive to both faith and reason.

Perhaps the Church should ban Pelosi from taking communion?


2016: Can America Afford An Over- the-Hill Lefty and Her Meandering Hubby Back in White House?

By John W. Lillpop

As President Barack Obama continues to make a mockery of American Exceptionalism with domestic scandal and tyranny, AND heretofore unprecedented examples of executive incoherence and incompetence on the international stage (G8, Putin, Syria), The One who just a few short years ago was hailed as The long-awaited Messiah for all peoples of the world, has devolved into a first-class embarrassment, especially for patriotic Americans.

After Obama’s disastrous speech in Germany following his pummeling at the hands of Super Bowl ring thief and Russian hit man Vladimir Putin, the world is surely asking: How was this man elected in the first place, and how in the hell was he re-elected?

Is this what the once-great America has come to?

Great questions, those! In answer, America needs to cull out pretenders and naïve community organizers from the pool of candidates offered as presidential candidates in the future.

Our nation also needs to get over the Rock Star phenomenon when electing presidents!

That would certainly apply to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton who has tried to run away from her own scandal involving the slaughter of four American diplomats in Benghazi, Libya.

Because she is a liberal Democrat, the mainstream media have created an image of the Hildabeast as America’s best hope in a “Post-Obama” world. This despite the fact that she accomplished NOTHING as Secretary of State, and is widely known as a congenital liar.

On top of all that, on October 26, 2016 the Hildabeast will turn 69, an age more appropriately suited for doting over grand children (assuming Chelsea eventually conceives).

Only Ronald Reagan was older (by several months) when elected to the presidency.

Lest we forget, Hillary is also married to a sex-addicted, impeached perjurer who disgraced the White House for eight awful years while holding the Oval Office under siege.

That man, Bill Clinton, will turn 70 in August 2016.

With all due respect to the Clintons, does America really need to install an over-the-hill, failed Secretary of State and her derelict mate after eight years of ruin at the hands of Barack Obama?

Come on, patriots, surely we can do better!


Nearly One Year on, SCOTUS Ruling on ObamaCare Lamented—By Obama and Democrats!

By John W. Lillpop

In a frightening harbinger of bad news which would consume America in 2012, the allegedly “conservative” Supreme Court of the United States, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, ruled 5-4 in favor of the Constitutionality of Obamacare, ridiculously titled the Affordable Care Act.

That gut-wrenching, traitorous ruling came on June 28, 2012, and was a bitter pill for conservative patriots to swallow, especially given most pre-ruling hype which forecast a defeat for Marxist health care, and certain trashing of President Obama’s “signature” legislation.

Since then, America has added to its considerable misery by re-electing Barack Obama to another four-years of tyranny-driven punishment, which threaten the viability of our treasured concepts of Democracy, liberty, and good old-fashioned common sense.

Within the space of less than five months, then, American was hit hard below the belt by the highest court in the land, and then by tens millions of entitlement-addicted voters who opted for more booty in a society that has all but run out of it.

YES! to food stamps, welfare, free cell phones, & financial imprudence, and NO! to smaller government, fiscal and individual responsibility, liberty, and Constitutional governance.  Forty-seven percent is not a majority, but is nontheless a formidable foe!

Conservatives had apparently lost the war in the battle for the hearts and souls of America. Leftist tyrants had taken over and seemed unstoppable.

But celebrations on the left have since subsided and given way to gloom and doom as Democrats face the reality of trying to implement a 2,000 page monstrosity that, despite its title, will increase the cost of health care, raise taxes, and generally wreak havoc with an already-fragile economy!

ObamaCare will probably cost many Americans their health-care coverage! Some success for a scam that was sold on the basis of adding 40 million people to the ranks of the insured while reducing overall costs!

Joy has been replaced with trepidation as Democrats face political ruin during the mid-term elections of 2014. The US House seems comfortably in the hands of the GOP, and the Senate could easily go the same way.

So, nearly one year on, the big question is: Will the disaster that John Roberts and his four colleagues dumped on the US end up costing the Democrat Party and its boy-man-Messiah-spy, Barack Hussein Obama?


Michelle Obama: America’s Graceless Princess?

By John W. Lillpop

With tens of millions of Americans under or unemployed, millions more fighting to save their homes and hopes for retirement, one would expect those who profess to be for the “little guy” to be more circumspect when traveling at taxpayer expense.

Yet, there she is, the self-ordained Princess of Progressive America, Michelle Obama, spending money as recklessly and foolishly as if she were an official member of the Obama Administration.

As reported at the reference, Michelle’s excesses include a hotel room in Dublin, immodestly named the Princess Grace Suite, which strongly suggests that Mrs. Obama has decided not to wait for the official ancestry research of Barack to be completed: She has decided that The One and She are of royalty stock, a decision which supports her $3,300 a night lodging at the Princess Grace Suite:

The costs include, but are not limited to, Air Force One travel costs which are approximately $180,000 per hour when the aircraft is off the ground. Additional costs on this trip include the two modes of transportation needed – Air Force One and Air Force Two – as the president and the rest of his family will be separated. Also, First Lady Michelle and her daughters are reportedly staying in the Five-Star Shelbourne Hotel where 30 rooms had been reserved for Mrs. Obama’s entourage and secret service security for the family. The hotel’s website says the facility has no vacancies during the time the First Family members are there. The First Lady is staying in a luxurious Princess Grace suite that costs $3,300 per night. The Princess Grace Suite has two beds, two bathrooms, four phones, and three large televisions. United States tax-payers pay for First Family travel expenses.

While the president is at the G8 Summit, First Lady Michelle and First Daughters Malia, 14, and Sasha, 11, will be out-and-about doing a variety of activities including the investigation of the Obamas’ ancestry from Ireland. It was previously researched that President Barack Obama’s great-great-great grandfather was from Moneygall, Co. Offaly. The great-great-great grandfather and his son Falmouth Kearney came to the United States in 1850.”

Whatever the family tree reveals, one fact is sure: Michelle Obama is NO Princess Grace!

Reference: http://www.examiner.com/article/michelle-obama-s-dublin-hotel-room-costs-3-300-per-night


Listen Up, Marco Rubio: Pay for Border Security by Reducing Foreign Aid Sent to Mexico!

By John W. Lillpop

Any remaining doubts as to the mental fitness of Senator Marco Rubio (R-FLA) to represent conservative thought and American ideals in the debate over amnesty were shattered when the Senator offered the following convoluted justification for legalizing the 11 million(closer to 40 million!), invaders before securing the border.

Rubio’s mental collapse was reported thusly at the reference:

Why is it necessary to legalize the roughly 11 million currently-illegal immigrants in the U.S. before newly enhanced border security and internal enforcement measures are in place? Sen. Marco Rubio, the leading Republican on the Senate’s Gang of Eight, says part of the reason is that the federal government can’t afford to secure the border on its own and needs financial help from the immigrants themselves, in the form of fines paid when they are legalized.

Rubio made the statement during a radio interview after he voted against an amendment from Republican Sen. Charles Grassley that would have put off legalization until after the border is secure — a position supported by majorities of voters across the political spectrum. Host Andrea Tantaros asked Rubio why he opposed something that was important “to so many in the Republican party?”

Rubio’s first reason was that the U.S. has no other choice than to legalize the 11 million. Enhancing security first would take an estimated four years, and Rubio declared, “We cannot wait another four years with 11 million people living in this country illegally without knowing who they are or why they’re here.”

But there was another reason. “We need to register them as soon as possible, not just to keep the problem from getting worse, but we’re going to require them to pay a fine, and that’s the money that we are going to use to pay for the border security,” Rubio explained. “If we don’t get that fine money from the people that have violated our immigration laws, then the American taxpayer is going to have to pay for border security.”

Rubio’s assertion is sort of like Barack Obama’s idiotic argument in 2009 that the US should legalize invaders in order to cover said criminals under ObamaCare!

According to Rubio and Obama, perhaps law enforcement should stop arresting known bank robbers until enough money is raised to build the prisons and penal infrastructure needed to accommodate the miscreants?

Tragically, Rubio apparently also shares Obama’s utter disregard for rule of law and American sovereignty. He also shares Obama’s ‘surrender to evil’ mentality!

Why not give the rule of law a chance, Marco?

After all, American citizens have been waiting for 27 years, since adoption of the 1986 Immigration Control and Reform Act(IRCA), for our government to enact the enforcement provisions of IRCA.

So big damn deal if the invaders have to live in the shadows for another four years or so!

BONUS: We can pay for border security by subtracting the costs from the foreign aid sent to third-world nations like Mexico?

A win-win, Marco? In America’s favor, no less!



Old Glory No Longer “Cool”?

By John W. Lillpop

June 14 used to be celebrated as Flag Day. A day set aside to remember Old Glory and the brave American heroes who fought and died to keep her aloft and symbolic of American Exceptionalism.

June 14 used to be the day when patriotic Americans would fly Old Glory in front of homes, schools, churches and businesses as a show of unity with the peoples of the greatest nation on earth.

Yesterday was June 14, yet there was scant evidence of Old Glory in San Jose, California where I maintain my humble abode.

Old Glory was not mentioned in the local newspapers or on television. Its as if the Old Gal is no longer important enough—even the flag burners hardly bother torching her anymore.

In the modern vernacular, the American flag is now “old school” which is not cool in an era devoted to worshiping all things fresh and young.

Perhaps the ongoing Obama scandals are also to blame, at least partially?

Indeed, flying the Stars and Stripes may be viewed by IRS crack pots as too “patriotic,” and a clear sign that an intense and invasive audit of the self-admitted patriot is called for?

Showing off Old Glory might even send a signal to weasels at the NSA to watch your phone calls, e-mails, and tweets for any sign of excessive patriotism that might jeopardize national security, or even more ghastly, Obama’s approval ratings?

To hell with all that, says I. Old Glory is the most beautiful symbol of freedom and decency ever created.

She shall always be welcome in my home!

Nancy Pelosi’s Goofy Definition of “Sacred Ground”: Late-Term Abortion!

By John W. Lillpop

Representative Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) believes that late-term abortion is ‘sacred ground’ and thus opposes legislation that would ban abortions after 20 weeks.

Pelosi’s unintelligible blathering on the subject was captured on the YouTube video below and is detailed in the text reported at the reference:


The text from the reference:

WASHINGTON, D.C., June 13, 2013 (LifeSiteNews.com) – In response to a question today from a reporter about a late-term abortion ban that is being proposed in Congress, Democratic Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi said that the issue of late-term abortion is “sacred ground” for her. [I have to ask... did she take off her shoes when she said that?!?]

“As a practicing and respectful Catholic, [GAH!] this is sacred ground to me when we talk about this,” Pelosi said. “This shouldn’t have anything to do with politics.” [See what she is doing? "Faith" is only private.]

A Weekly Standard reporter had pointed out that the bill was proposed by legislators in response to the horrific case of late-term abortionist Kermit Gosnell, who was found guilty of murder for “snipping” the spinal cords of three babies born alive.

“They argue that there really isn’t much of a moral difference between what someone like Dr. Gosnell did to infants born at 23, 24, 25 weeks into pregnancy, and what can happen [legally] at a clinic down the road in Maryland where a doctor says he’ll perform an elective abortions 28 weeks into pregnancy,” asked the reporter. “So, the question I have for you is what is the moral difference between what Dr. Gosnell did to a baby born alive at 23 weeks and aborting her moments before birth?”

Pelosi responded by saying that what Gosnell did was “reprehensible,” but then said that the bill is also “reprehensible,” suggesting that it shows “disrespect” to “a judgment a woman makes about her reproductive health.” [So late-term abortions are "sacred ground".]

The bill would ban abortions after 20 weeks based upon evidence that by that age the unborn child can feel the pain of the brutal procedure, which in some cases involves dismemberment while the baby is still alive.

The reporter continued to push Pelosi, asking her what the difference was between a 26 week abortion, and killing the baby after birth.

Pelosi responded that “this is not the issue” and suggested that the proposed bill would say that “there’s no abortion in our country.”

When the reporter tried once again to get Pelosi to answer the question, she shot back, “I’m not going to have this conversation with you, because you obviously have an agenda. You’re not interested in having an answer.”

That was when she also made the remark about the issue being “sacred ground.”

The Weekly Standard reporter complained: “It was a simple question. You didn’t answer.”

Pelosi, despite being one of the most pro-abortion legislators in Congress, has repeatedly said that she is a devout Catholic, and has defended her pro-abortion views in light of her faith.

Pelosi told Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift in 2010 that she had “some concerns” about the Catholic Church’s positions on abortion and homosexuality.

“I am a practicing Catholic, [GAH!] although they’re probably not too happy about that. But it is my faith,” said the former Speaker. “I practically mourn this difference of opinion because I feel what I was raised to believe is consistent with what I profess, and that is that we are all endowed with, a free will and a responsibility to answer for our actions. And that women should have that opportunity to exercise their free will.”

The Congresswoman has been publicly rebuked by numerous Catholic bishops over her position on moral issues.”

The big question: Nancy Pelosi is free to believe whatever she wants, however ridiculous. But why in Hades does she claim to be a “respectful Catholic”?

Is she that deluded?

Reference: http://wdtprs.com/blog/2013/06/nancy-pelosi-late-term-abortion-sacred-ground/


Obama Epiphany About Red Line In Syria: Unrelated to Multitude of Scandals?

By John W. Lillpop

Barack Obama has never ceased patting himself on the back for ending the Bush wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. His unabashed modesty produced this glowing endorsement of himself, "After a decade of grinding war, our brave men and women in uniform are coming home."

Never mind that the wars ended in surrender, rather victory. In Obama’s warped mind, actually winning a war is even more immoral than war itself.

Except, that is, when The One is up to his lying lips in scandal and disgrace, as is the case with Benghazi, IRS targeting of conservatives, Justice Department assault on journalists, and the ever-growing NSA scandal.

With all that scandal on his plate, Obama has desperate need for a “wagging the dog” crisis to reclaim ownership of the news cycle and breaking news headlines which threaten to rival Mexico and other third-world regimes for corruption and sleaze.

Thus, The One has apparently seen the light and the burning Red Line from Syria where 93,000 civilians have apparently been slaughtered by the Assad maniacs.

As reported at the reference:

President Barack Obama’s decision to send some light weapons to Syrian rebels may be too little and too late to thwart a regime offensive to retake Aleppo, the nation’s largest city and commercial capital.

Regime forces supported by fighters from the Iranian-backed Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah have moved north after defeating rebels in al-Qusair, a setback that triggered concern in Washington that Iran and its Lebanese ally are tipping the balance in favor of Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.
“Arming the Syrian rebels is unlikely to tip the balance in their favor,” said Shadi Hamid, director of research at the Brookings Institution’s Doha Center. “It might have made a difference a year ago, but, today, the Assad regime -- particularly after re-taking Qusair -- has the advantage.”
Even some U.S. officials are worried that Obama’s reluctant decision to provide limited amounts of small arms and ammunition to the Syrian opposition is enough to drag the U.S. into a third Middle east war but not enough to win it.”

Win it? Oh, naïve fools!

Barack Obama has neither the gonads nor stomach for winning ANY war, including the one in Syria.

All that Obama wants is relief from the daily stories about his corrupt administration and the  methodical disassembling of the US Constitution and the rule of law.

Win the war? Oh please, don’t be so silly!


Even Chuck Schumer Does Not Believe Janet Napolitano’s Spiel About Border Security!

By John W. Lillpop

Homeland Security head Janet Napolitano has repeatedly advised the US Congress and the American people that the US-Mexico border is “more secure now than ever.” Her operating philosophy has been that illegal aliens are not criminal invaders, but rather are “newly arrived refugees.”

Napolitano has worked hand-in-hand with Barack Obama to subvert the law by refusing to deport illegal aliens as part of a concocted deferment which rewards illegal aliens for being criminals.

Bottom line: Napolitano is, and has been, in charge of recruitment for the Democrat Party and, as such, has never taken enforcement of the border and law seriously.

The truth about border security and Napolitano’s big lie was unwittingly exposed recently by Senator Charles Schumer of New York who opposed an Amendment to the Senate Immigration Bill that would make border security a priority, before legalization. The senator made the argument that border security could take “years and years” to fully implement!

Excuse me, Senator. Have you not heard Napolitano’s claim that the border IS secure and has never been more so?

As reported at the reference, Schumer said the following:

Sen. Charles Schumer (N.Y.), the lead Democratic sponsor of the Senate immigration bill, warned it could take “years and years and years” to fully secure the border and implement reforms that would put the estimated 11 immigrants in the country illegally on a path to citizenship.

Schumer's comments came as the Senate voted Thursday morning — 57 to 43 — to defeat an amendment sponsored by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) to prohibit immigrants from receiving provisional immigrant status until the secretary of Homeland Security has maintained effective control of the borders for six months.

“It says that the 11 million people living in the shadows cannot even get RPI [Registered Provisional Immigrant] status, the provisional status by which they can work and travel, until the secretary of Homeland security says the border is fully secure,” Schumer said of the amendment. “Now, we all know that that will take years and years and years.”

Schumer noted that the Senate Judiciary Committee defeated Grassley’s proposal during a markup and that Republican members of the Gang of Eight — Sens. Lindsey Graham (S.C.) and Jeff Flake (Ariz.) — voted against it.

Schumer said the border would eventually be made secure but that it will take years and billions of dollars to build fences, watch towers and deploy drones and sensors.

He argued that it would be unreasonable to delay for years provisional legal status for millions of people.

“So what are we telling those 11 million? If you hide successfully from the police, then maybe five years from now you can stay here and get the right to work and the right to travel?”

Why not tell the invading illegals that America operates in accordance with rule of law and that being in America illegally is---well, illegal?

Tell them that any shadows they encounter are of their own making, and can be avoided by heading south past the US border?

Why in the hell is Schumer and his lunatic leftist comrades so damned concerned about illegal aliens and the inconvenience of shadows when the safety of American citizens is at peril?

Chuck Schumer has unwittingly made a perfect case for dumping the amnesty bill in the dumpster until border security is made the top priority.

Remember 1986, Senator Schumer?

If not, you should!

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/305289-schumer-could-take-years-and-years-and-years-to-secure-borders#ixzz2WCEDlJvp


Republicans Who Vote for Amnesty Must Be Replaced By Tea Party Patriots!

By John W. Lillpop

Senator Democrat Harry Reid stuck a figurative stick in both eyes of patriotic Americans who want to avoid the awful mistake of 1986 when the Immigration Reform and Control Act was passed with the promise that it would end illegal immigration once and for all.

As described at the reference, Reid decided that border security was less important than legalizing at least 11 million invaders, the great majority of whom will vote Democrat for life:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) made a move to formally kill an amendment Senate Judiciary Committee Ranking Member Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) offered to the immigration bill. It would require border security before America’s at least 11 million illegal immigrants are granted amnesty.

Reid filed a motion to “table” the amendment, a move that he used to quickly push for an up-or-down vote. A vote in favor of tabling the amendment would kill it. A vote against tabling the amendment would allow it to move through for debate. Essentially, a vote for Reid’s motion is a vote against securing the border before amnesty. Likewise, a vote against Reid’s motion is a vote for securing the border before granting amnesty.

The Senate Reference guide describes a motion to table as: “The motion is used to dispose quickly of questions the Senate does not wish to consider further.”
Reid’s motion to table the amendment passed 57-43, with Gang of Eight Republican Sens. John McCain (R-AZ). Marco Rubio (R-FL), Jeff Flake (R-AZ) and Lindsey Graham (R-SC) voting with Reid. Democrat Sens. Joe Manchin and Mark Pryor voted against Reid in favor of border security before amnesty, as did Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-NH). Ayotte had previously indicated support for the Gang of Eight bill.”

Reid’s action affirms the fact that most Democrats are loathe to even thinking about border security, because all of those new potential Democrats are far too appealing to those who do not give a damn about American sovereignty, language and culture.

We expect traitorous behavior from Democrats—that is their mark.

However, Republicans are supposed to be the party of law and order and common sense.  That supposition is clearly out the window for the likes of John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Marco Rubio.

McCain, Graham, and Rubio must be removed from the US Senate by Tea Party candidates who respect and love America!



Lowering the Bar on Integrity: “Least Untruthful Answer” Now Acceptable?

By John W Lillpop

Barack Obama’s dysfunctional administration, having failed multiple smell checks on transparency and integrity, has added to its tarnished image by downgrading the word “honesty,” such now that it now includes “least untruthful answer.”

As reported at the reference, the latest language manipulation employed by Obama and minions to justify the unjustifiable has emerged as a result of the National Security Agency fiasco:

As the Obama administration insists that Congress was fully informed about the National Security Agency's widespread surveillance on Americans' phone records, its intelligence chief is becoming a complication.

James Clapper, the director of national intelligence, has now admitted he gave the "least untruthful" answer to a direct question in March about the extent of surveillance on US citizens. The admission sets up a critical test of Clapper's relationship with the congressional committees that oversee him – committees the Obama administration is relying on for its defense of the surveillance efforts.

The Obama team is expressing support for Clapper as criticism of him mounts. "The president has full faith in director Clapper and his leadership of the intelligence community," National Security Council spokeswoman Caitlin Hayden told the Guardian on Wednesday.

At least one member of Congress is calling for Clapper's head. On his Facebook page, Justin Amash, a Michigan Republican, wrote that Clapper "lied under oath" to Congress.

"It now appears clear that the director of national intelligence, James Clapper, lied under oath to Congress and the American people," Amash posted on Wednesday morning. "Members of Congress can't make informed decisions on intelligence issues when the head of the intelligence community wilfully makes false statements. Perjury is a serious crime. Mr Clapper should resign immediately."

At a hearing of the Senate intelligence committee on 12 March, Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden grew frustrated that he could not get a "direct answer" from Clapper about a question Wyden said he had been posing to the intelligence agencies in a series of letters for a year: when do US spies need a warrant to surveil Americans' communications?

"What I wanted to see is if you could give me a yes or no answer to the question: does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" Wyden asked Clapper.

"No, sir," Clapper said. "Not wittingly. There are cases where they could inadvertently, perhaps, collect, but not wittingly."

Clapper's claim to Congress was undermined by an April order of the secretive Fisa court instructing Verizon to turn over phone records on millions of Americans to the National Security Agency. Published by the Guardian, the order explicitly authorized the NSA to collect so-called metadata "between the United States and abroad; or wholly within the United States, including local telephone calls." An NSA data-mining program, called Boundless Informant and also revealed by the Guardian, further allows the NSA to sort its collected communications by country of origin.

Clapper defended himself in a surprising way. He told NBC's Andrea Mitchell this week that the question was unfair, akin to asking him when he was going to stop beating his wife. "So I responded in what I thought was the most truthful, or least untruthful manner by saying no," Clapper said.”

Yet another example of how Barack Obama and his disciples of evil continues to misuse the English language to disguise unconstitutional behavior!



Edward Snowden: Deserving of the Death Penalty, or a Nobel Peace Prize?

By John W. Lillpop

Edward Snowden caused quite a row over the weekend with his bombshell disclosures concerning the NSA surveillance program including what are presumed to be innocent American citizens.

Snowden expected a tsunami of outrage, panic, and controversy. He was not disappointed.

Reaction to the Snowden mea culpa varies wildly. For example, CFP contributor CLIFF KINCAID sees Snowden as am “enemy agent” in the referenced article in the CFP on June 10.


On the other hand, JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO, of FOX NEWS, describes Snowden as an American hero:
I would describe this man as an American hero, as a person willing to risk life, limb and liberty in order to expose to the American people one of the most extraordinary violations of the American principles, value judgments and the constitution itself in all of our history.

A person so familiar with the intelligence community, as you heard from the excerpts that you just played. He's aware of the personal danger to himself. He knows of the likelihood of prosecution. But he also understands that the government listening to half the country is not what was bargained for when statutes were enacted in the days and weeks after 9/11.


Then there is LT. COL. RALPH PETERS who says:

Now you got this 29-year-old high school dropout whistle blower making foreign policy for our country, our security policy, and the guy -- I think it's sad, we've made treason cool. Betraying your country is kind of a fashion statement. He wants to be the national security Kim Kardashian, he cites Bradley Manning as a hero. I mean, we need to get very, very serious about treason and oh, by the way, for treason, as in the case of Bradley Manning or Edward Snowden, you bring back the death penalty. (FOX & Friends, June 10, 2013)


The one thing every one seems to agree on is that Snowden hit a very, very raw nerve.

Given the arbitrary, partisan nature of the Nobel Peace Prize in recent years, perhaps Snowden will join Barack Obama as among the most unworthy nominess for that coveted award?


Who Is Edward Snowden, and Can He Save America from Obama's Transformation?

NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden: 'I don't want to live in a society that does these sort of things' – video

By John W. Lillpop

As America and the world digest news of the latest scandal to engulf Barack Obama and his NSA spying ring, a new name has emerged, that of Edward Snowden, a former CIA employee who has come forward as the whistle blower with the goods on Obama.

As reported at the reference:

The individual responsible for one of the most significant leaks in US political history is Edward Snowden, a 29-year-old former technical assistant for the CIA and current employee of the defence contractor Booz Allen Hamilton. Snowden has been working at the National Security Agency for the last four years as an employee of various outside contractors, including Booz Allen and Dell.

The Guardian, after several days of interviews, is revealing his identity at his request. From the moment he decided to disclose numerous top-secret documents to the public, he was determined not to opt for the protection of anonymity. "I have no intention of hiding who I am because I know I have done nothing wrong," he said.

Snowden will go down in history as one of America's most consequential whistleblowers, alongside Daniel Ellsberg and Bradley Manning. He is responsible for handing over material from one of the world's most secretive organisations – the NSA.

In a note accompanying the first set of documents he provided, he wrote: "I understand that I will be made to suffer for my actions," but "I will be satisfied if the federation of secret law, unequal pardon and irresistible executive powers that rule the world that I love are revealed even for an instant."

Despite his determination to be publicly unveiled, he repeatedly insisted that he wants to avoid the media spotlight. "I don't want public attention because I don't want the story to be about me. I want it to be about what the US government is doing."

He does not fear the consequences of going public, he said, only that doing so will distract attention from the issues raised by his disclosures. "I know the media likes to personalize political debates, and I know the government will demonize me."

Despite these fears, he remained hopeful his outing will not divert attention from the substance of his disclosures. "I really want the focus to be on these documents and the debate which I hope this will trigger among citizens around the globe about what kind of world we want to live in." He added: "My sole motive is to inform the public as to that which is done in their name and that which is done against them."

He has had "a very comfortable life" that included a salary of roughly $200,000, a girlfriend with whom he shared a home in Hawaii, a stable career, and a family he loves. "I'm willing to sacrifice all of that because I can't in good conscience allow the US government to destroy privacy, internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with this massive surveillance machine they're secretly building."

'I am not afraid, because this is the choice I've made'

Three weeks ago, Snowden made final preparations that resulted in last week's series of blockbuster news stories. At the NSA office in Hawaii where he was working, he copied the last set of documents he intended to disclose.

He then advised his NSA supervisor that he needed to be away from work for "a couple of weeks" in order to receive treatment for epilepsy, a condition he learned he suffers from after a series of seizures last year.

As he packed his bags, he told his girlfriend that he had to be away for a few weeks, though he said he was vague about the reason. "That is not an uncommon occurrence for someone who has spent the last decade working in the intelligence world."

On May 20, he boarded a flight to Hong Kong, where he has remained ever since. He chose the city because "they have a spirited commitment to free speech and the right of political dissent", and because he believed that it was one of the few places in the world that both could and would resist the dictates of the US government.

In the three weeks since he arrived, he has been ensconced in a hotel room. "I've left the room maybe a total of three times during my entire stay," he said. It is a plush hotel and, what with eating meals in his room too, he has run up big bills.

He is deeply worried about being spied on. He lines the door of his hotel room with pillows to prevent eavesdropping. He puts a large red hood over his head and laptop when entering his passwords to prevent any hidden cameras from detecting them.

Though that may sound like paranoia to some, Snowden has good reason for such fears. He worked in the US intelligence world for almost a decade. He knows that the biggest and most secretive surveillance organization in America, the NSA, along with the most powerful government on the planet, is looking for him.

Since the disclosures began to emerge, he has watched television and monitored the internet, hearing all the threats and vows of prosecution emanating from Washington.

And he knows only too well the sophisticated technology available to them and how easy it will be for them to find him. The NSA police and other law enforcement officers have twice visited his home in Hawaii and already contacted his girlfriend, though he believes that may have been prompted by his absence from work, and not because of suspicions of any connection to the leaks.

"All my options are bad," he said. The US could begin extradition proceedings against him, a potentially problematic, lengthy and unpredictable course for Washington. Or the Chinese government might whisk him away for questioning, viewing him as a useful source of information. Or he might end up being grabbed and bundled into a plane bound for US territory.

"Yes, I could be rendered by the CIA. I could have people come after me. Or any of the third-party partners. They work closely with a number of other nations. Or they could pay off the Triads. Any of their agents or assets," he said.

"We have got a CIA station just up the road – the consulate here in Hong Kong – and I am sure they are going to be busy for the next week. And that is a concern I will live with for the rest of my life, however long that happens to be."

Having watched the Obama administration prosecute whistleblowers at a historically unprecedented rate, he fully expects the US government to attempt to use all its weight to punish him. "I am not afraid," he said calmly, "because this is the choice I've made."

He predicts the government will launch an investigation and "say I have broken the Espionage Act and helped our enemies, but that can be used against anyone who points out how massive and invasive the system has become".

The only time he became emotional during the many hours of interviews was when he pondered the impact his choices would have on his family, many of whom work for the US government. "The only thing I fear is the harmful effects on my family, who I won't be able to help any more. That's what keeps me up at night," he said, his eyes welling up with tears.

'You can't wait around for someone else to act'

Snowden did not always believe the US government posed a threat to his political values. He was brought up originally in Elizabeth City, North Carolina. His family moved later to Maryland, near the NSA headquarters in Fort Meade.

By his own admission, he was not a stellar student. In order to get the credits necessary to obtain a high school diploma, he attended a community college in Maryland, studying computing, but never completed the coursework. (He later obtained his GED.)

In 2003, he enlisted in the US army and began a training program to join the Special Forces. Invoking the same principles that he now cites to justify his leaks, he said: "I wanted to fight in the Iraq war because I felt like I had an obligation as a human being to help free people from oppression".

He recounted how his beliefs about the war's purpose were quickly dispelled. "Most of the people training us seemed pumped up about killing Arabs, not helping anyone," he said. After he broke both his legs in a training accident, he was discharged.

After that, he got his first job in an NSA facility, working as a security guard for one of the agency's covert facilities at the University of Maryland. From there, he went to the CIA, where he worked on IT security. His understanding of the internet and his talent for computer programming enabled him to rise fairly quickly for someone who lacked even a high school diploma.”

Will this young man stop Barack Obama from destroying America?



What About Future Deportation Policy, Mr. President?

By John W. Lillpop

As Democrats and RINOs continue to push a plan that would exchange American sovereignty, culture, language, and Exceptionalism for cheap labor and Democrat voters, President Obama has joined the fray by trying to sound “harsh” during his weekly address.

Obama said the following about the American fire sale now being considered in the US Senate under the misnomer “Immigration Reform”:

"This bill would provide a pathway to earned citizenship for the 11 million individuals who are already in this country illegally--a pathway that includes passing a background check, learning English, paying taxes and a penalty, and then going to the back of the line behind everyone who's playing by the rules and trying to come here legally."

Obama’s all-too-transparent sell out to the illegal alien constituency misses a major point:

America is inundated with tens of millions of illegal aliens today because of the government’s refusal to secure the borders AND, just as importantly, the refusal to round up and deport invaders as authorized by the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986.

In fact, this administration has not only failed to pursue aggressive round up and deport policies, it has defiantly done the opposite by deliberately deferring deportations.

The fact that the Barack Obama-Janet Napolitano deferral scandal was enacted in an election year which helped persuade Hispanics to vote Democrat is yet another impeachable offense to add to the Obama legacy.

Although securing the border is essential and must be accomplished before any amnesty, the government must also enforce the law and deport any and all illegals who successfully invade.

Make no mistake about it: There will BE future invasions into America from across the Mexican border, regardless of how tough the amnesty bill may be.

Unless our elected officials are willing to round up and deport every last illegal alien, notwithstanding all the “Breaking up the family” sob stories, America will be again be inundated with millions of “undocumented” illegals in short order.

In the future, massive Deportations MUST be executed, without exception,  to defend America against unwelcome invasions!

The era of regarding illegal aliens as "Newly Arrived Refugees" MUST END!

ObamaCare: Government Welfare for Lawyers, Tax Accountants!

By John W. Lillpop

As the May employment report makes clear, the US is in for yet another failed “Summer of Recovery” from the Obama administration.

Higher taxes and Barack Obama’s hateful anti-business policies—including ObamaCare-- are the key culprits in keeping America mired in a slow-growth, no jobs quagmire.

Marxist health care is, however, spurring hopes for improved employment numbers among two of Obama’s more loyal and corrupt constituencies, Trial Lawyers and Tax Accountants.

Both of these professions look to grow exponentially as the Obamacare curse tightens its grip around the throats of innocent, often dying, Americans.

Note please that HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius appears to have spawned a new industry on her own with her clumsy handling of the plight of a dying 10-year-old girl in urgent need of a lung transplant.

The family of the Pennsylvania girl, Sarah Murnaghan, used an attorney to take Sebelius to court where a judge slapped Sebelius down and ordered to stop begging for ObamaCare money long enough to show some compassion for a desperate child.

Court documents also show that the mother of Javier Acosta filed suit on Thursday, after a judge forced Sebelius to order the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, or OPTN, to make an exception for 10-year-old Sarah Murnaghan of Pennsylvania this week.

It is worth noting that Sebelius is a passionate advocate for Planned Parenthood and once served as executive director and chief lobbyist for the Kansas Trial Lawyers Association.

Get that?

Sebelius was a big shot for the Trial Lawyers Association in Kansas and now she is in charge of a government welfare service that involves 18% of the US economy!

Just coincidence, or programmed larceny?
Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/kathleen-sebelius-childs-lung-transplant-92237.html#ixzz2Vcx37lW7 director of Health and Human Services


War on Terror Is No More: So, NSA Can Stand Down, Right, Barack?

By John W. Lillpop

The simply awful news of the week is that America’s precious freedoms as provided for in the grand experiment called Democracy has been scuttled by a Marxist community organizer posing as President who fancies himself as a Constitutional scholar, and who falsely promotes himself as a world-class advocate of transparency and open government.

Obama’s latest impeachable scandal is all the more bitter when one considers that while NSA snooped and spied on hundreds of millions of innocent Americans, Islamic killers like the Boston Bombers eluded US authorities and were able to kill and mutilate Boston Marathon participants, despite specific, multiple warnings from foreign authorities.

But, alas, the good news of the week is that NSA’s illegal and unconstitutional assault on We the People was executed in the name of boosting counter- terrorism projects by Obama’s inept government.

Therefore, now that the war on terror is over, declared as such by our clueless  Commander-in-Chief himself, the new order of the day from the President to NSA to Verizon, Yahoo etc. is: STAND DOWN AGAINST AMERICA!

Right, Barack?


Old Gray Lady: Obama Has Lost All Credibility!

By John W. Lillpop

As the Obama scandals grow greater in number and gravity with each passing day, even Obama’s most loyal lefty soldiers are refusing to automatically salute the sullied Commander-in-Chief.

Those so disinclined now include the New York Times which, following revelations that the Obama administration is collecting telephone records on all Americans, believes that The One has lost all credibility when it comes to transparency and accountability.

As reported at the reference:

Within hours of the disclosure that federal authorities routinely collect data on phone calls Americans make, regardless of whether they have any bearing on a counterterrorism investigation, the Obama administration issued the same platitude it has offered every time President Obama has been caught overreaching in the use of his powers: Terrorists are a real menace and you should just trust us to deal with them because we have internal mechanisms (that we are not going to tell you about) to make sure we do not violate your rights.

Those reassurances have never been persuasive — whether on secret warrants to scoop up a news agency’s phone records or secret orders to kill an American suspected of terrorism — especially coming from a president who once promised transparency and accountability.

The administration has now lost all credibility on this issue. Mr. Obama is proving the truism that the executive branch will use any power it is given and very likely abuse it. That is one reason we have long argued that the Patriot Act, enacted in the heat of fear after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks by members of Congress who mostly had not even read it, was reckless in its assignment of unnecessary and overbroad surveillance powers.”

The Ney York Times says the Executive Branch will use and abuse any power it is given? Even the beloved Barack Obama?

Hear, hear! When the New York Times sounds the alarm for slapping Barack Obama down, you know revolution is in the air!

The big question: Where will you be when the revolution officially begins?


84-Year-Old Wins $591 Million Lottery: Better Late Than Never?

By John W. Lillpop

Gloria MacKenzie had a real good day May 18: She won the power ball lottery worth about $591 million, before taxes.

No Doubt the 84-year-old Floridian woman is wild with joy!  All of those dreams can now be realized.

On the other hand, Ms. MacKenzie must be cursing the heavens for waiting so damn long to bring Serendipity into her life.

After all, at her age, there simply are not a whole of lot of years left in which to enjoy her newly minted wealth.

Still, my congratulations to Gloria and best wishes for a great time in the years ahead.

And if you are looking for a conservative gentleman to escort you through your remaining golden years(for a small fee), I can be reached 24/7 in California!


Barack Obama Has His Way With Susan Rice!

By John W. Lillpop

Have Republicans managed to get into the head of President Obama?

The question is posed because of Obama’s petulant action as concerns Susan Rice, one- time Ambassador to the United Nations and most prominently in the news recently for presenting a discredited time line about the events surrounding the September 11 Benghazi attack to five major Sunday news shows last September, whilst America was in the middle of a heated political campaign.

Republicans still take umbrage with Rice for her role in the Benghazi scandal, and raised such a fuss that Obama was eventually forced to abandon his plan to elevate Rice to the position of Secretary of State to replace Hillary Clinton, who is already running to replace Obama in 2016.

One senses that the President was none too pleased with what he saw as the GOP’s shoddy treatment of his good and faithful servant, the "do as you are told" loyalist, Susan Rice.

No doubt smoldering anger and resentment drove Obama to “revenge politics,” a sadistic form of political gamesmanship used by spoiled brats, mostly out-of-touch elitist intellectuals in their 50s, to turn serious issues like national security into grudge matches for marble matches gone awry.

In psychological babble-talk, Barack is clearly failing in his efforts to keep his “Inner Child of the Past” under control.

Which explains his decision to appoint Rice as his next security adviser, a position that does not require approval from anyone except The One himself.

No damn Republican input required, or desired!

How’s that for an “In Your Face” slap down from Obama’s little boy?

Mature observers will note that national security IS about more than marble matches and the hurt feelings of a scorned brat, however precocious he may be!


Seeing Through the Non-Existent Obama “Transparency”

By John W. Lillpop

Americans are, by and large, a fair-minded, reasonable people willing to give others, even notoriously unreliable politicians, the benefit of the doubt.

There is a limit, however.

Take, for instance, Barack Obama’s broken promise that his would be the “most open, transparent administration in history.”

The exact words from The One are repeated below from his aptly but deceptively titled, “Transparency and Open Government” document issued in the opening moments of his first term.

From Obama’s lying lips to the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies:

“My Administration is committed to creating an unprecedented level of openness in Government. We will work together to ensure the public trust and establish a system of transparency, public participation, and collaboration. Openness will strengthen our democracy and promote efficiency and effectiveness in Government.”

Such high-minded objectives and commitments to the common good make one proud to be an American. At first blush, that is.

Regrettably, the miserable Obama transparency record over the past four plus years has turned naïve pride into embarrassment, disgust, and distrust of government.

Indeed, with three major scandals concurrently hounding Barack Obama, transparency is nowhere to be found.

And the Obama transparency malarkey is finally being acknowledged as pure malarkey by large numbers of Americans, as reported at the reference:

Americans doubt the Obama administration can be trusted in the wake of the recent IRS scandal and other controversies, but most people stop short of holding the president personally responsible, a new poll has found.

A majority of respondents, or 55 percent, said the IRS scrutiny of conservative groups raised their doubts about the administration's "overall honesty and integrity," according to a Wall Street Journal/NBC survey of 1,000 adults.

A similar proportion of respondents said the administration's handling of the terrorist attack on a U.S. compound in Benghazi, Libya, last September and the recent surveillance of reporters by the Justice Department also contributed to their dimmer view of the administration.

Furthermore, just 27 percent of independents see the president as being "honest and straightforward" compared to 45 percent who thought so in January.

"The poll's big story is the sharp erosion among independents," Yang said.

Meanwhile, of the three controversies surrounding the administration, people pin the most blame on the president for his handling of Benghazi, with 41 percent of those surveyed saying he is primarily responsible.

But McInturff suggested the controversies are not yet having a serious effect on his presidency. "These episodes are not Iran-Contra," he said, adding that they are "impacting but not restructuring" the president's public support.”

Caution to Obamamites : Given the legendary Obama narcissism and arrogance, it surely won’t be long until all voters join Independents in recognizing the fundamental failings of Barack Hussein Obama.

Hint: Eric Holder’s resignation could hasten that day of enlightenment!

Ref 1: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the_press_office/TransparencyandOpenGovernment

Ref 2 http://www.newsmax.com/newswidget/obama-scandal-poll honesty/2013/06/05/id/508156?promo_code=10E2C-1&utm_source=10E2Canadafreepress&utm_medium=nmwidget&utm_campaign=widgetphase1

Rep. Jim McDermott(D-WA) Blames Tea Party for IRS Corruption, Tyranny!

By John W. Lillpop

Most sane people, occasionally including President Barack Obama, other leading Democrats, as well as the incoming director of the IRS, all agree that the ongoing targeting scandal involving the IRS vendetta against conservative organizations was an unmitigated outrage, perhaps unconstitutional and or illegal, definitely un-American, and in need of urgent remedial action to assure there is no repeat.

Mind you, the operative words are SANE people.

On the other hand, you have the likes of Rep. Jim McDermott, far- left loon from Washington state, who has dedicated his miserable life to lowering the bar on expectations for ethics and fairness from government agencies.

At a House Committee hearing on IRS misconduct, Rep. McDermott used his bullying mouth in a failed attempt to shift the blame for the IRS crimes to the victims, those conservative organizations with the audacity to use terms like “Patriot” and “Tea Party” in their applications for tax exempt status.

McDermott’s pitiful slobbering on behalf of the fund-raising wing of the DNC—the IRS—was an embarrassment, not only to the good people of Washington, but to each and every American who has been in the clutches of uncontrolled tyranny such as that practiced by an out-of-control IRS.

As reported at the reference, McDermott chased common sense and intellectual honesty from the Hill with inane comments like this:

“Each of your groups is highly political,” the congressman said. “From opposing the President’s healthcare reform, to abortion restrictions, to gay marriage, you’re all entrenched in some of the most controversial political issues in this country – and with your applications you are asking the American public to pay for that work. Many of you host and endorse candidates. The line between permitted political activity and non-permitted political activity can be very fine, and it’s important that tax payers know which side you fall on.”

The obvious rejoinder is to ask the bloated Representative how in the hell it was that a Barack Obama family member was able to apply for, and receive, tax-free status within 30 days? Or how it was that the Lois Lerner gangsters did not target liberal organizations “entrenched in controversial political issues”?

Luck of the draw, Representative McDermott?

With any luck at all, the good people of Washington state will come to their collective senses in November 2014, Representative, and send you to retire in much deserved misery!