The Lame-Duck Legacy of Barack Obama!

By John W Lillpop

To paraphrase a popular saying, “If it quacks and acts like a lame duck, it MUST be… Barack Obama!”

Oh, how far and fast the mighty have fallen!

Just a mere six years ago, Barack Obama was being trumpeted all across America as The One who would eradicate decades of corruption, inequality, and unabridged evil from the body politic, thereby bringing Hope and Change to tens of millions of worthy Americans longing for a stake in the American Dream.

By the sheer force of his personal appeal and charisma, Barack would:

Replace war and conflict with diplomacy and non-stop talk as a means for resolving human differences;

Lead the world in efforts to disarm all nations;

Provide the most transparent administration in US history, thereby restoring the consent of the governed;

Heal frayed relationships between America and the Islamic world;

Through wealth redistribution and other government programs, transform America into a society where entitlements and utter dependency on government supplanted capitalism and individual responsibility as keys to economic prosperity;

Bring an end to bitter racial divisions plaguing America for centuries;

Replace the use of coal and fossil sources of energy with
affordable and clean wind and solar power;

Provide affordable health care insurance for all Americans;

End the curse of global warming, and

Eliminate borders and enforcement of immigration laws, thereby rescuing invading criminals from the shadows of American society.

So, how is The One doing, so far?

As reported at the reference, Barack Hussein Obama has fallen from the graces of the American people in a most dramatic fashion:

President Obama came into office promising to be the opposite of George W. Bush, but he is imitating his predecessor in one regard — his second-term slide in popularity is almost a mirror image of the Republican’s declining fortunes in 2005.

Mr. Obama’s job-approval ratings in most polls this month were 40 percent or lower, down from 54 percent at the start of the year and the lowest of his presidency. Mr. Bush’s popularity in December 2005 stood at 43 percent, down from a high of 57 percent near the beginning of his second term and less than half the 90 percent-plus approval ratings in the days after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Only Watergate-plagued Richard Nixon had a worse rating than Mr. Obama at the same point of his presidency, in 1973. Although presidents tend to lose some public approval after winning second terms, Mr. Obama’s numbers slipped more quickly than most others.

“The history of the presidency is like an hourglass with the sand running out,” said Stephen Hess, a presidential historian at the left-leaning Brookings Institution. “There is a little bump up at the start of the fifth year, and then the downward trend continues. The problem here is that Obama had such a terrible fifth year. He blew that one opportunity he had to put some things together.”

Almost from the moment of his reelection, Mr. Obama was sidetracked by scandals including the Internal Revenue Service targeting of conservative groups and revelations of widespread spying by the National Security Agency.

In October came the hapless launch of the Obamacare
web site and the public’s realization that Mr. Obama didn’t tell the truth when he assured consumers that they could keep their health insurance policies if that’s what they preferred. The president’s broken promise damaged his credibility and was chosen by an independent fact-checking group as the biggest political lie of 2013.

Asked about his plummeting numbers at a Dec. 20 news conference, Mr. Obama took refuge in the answer of all elected officials whose ratings are down: He is not worried about polls.

“I have now been in office five years, close to five years, was running for president for two years before that, and we have had ups and we have had downs,” Mr. Obama said. “I took this job to deliver for the American people, and I knew and will continue to know that there are going to be ups and downs on it.”
Clearly, Barack Obama still does not get it!

His lack of humility and brash arrogance all but guarantee a lame-duck legacy that rivals that of Richard M. Nixon!



Should Unsolicited “MERRY CHRISTMAS!” Be Prosecuted As a Hate Crime?

By John W. Lillpop

There is growing discontent among liberal intellectuals that “free speech” is being abused to mask racial slurs, homophobia, and other objectionable thoughts and expressions, deemed unsuitable for public consumption by the left, and, therefore, should be banned.

For example, left-wing pundits have decided that calling the Affordable Care Act “Obamacare” is somehow a racial slur.

Of course, the REAL slur is calling Obamacare “affordable,” as millions of millions are discovering to their utter horror.

Just in time for the Holidays, the Phil Robertson Duck Dynasty kerfuffel has ruffled more than just a few duck feathers as the Patriarch of America’s favorite TV family had the audacity to defend traditional boy-girl relationships, albeit with the use of overly- graphic words which, in truth, detract from the main message.

Robertson’s dissertation on the relative merits of male and female body parts as instruments of carnal pleasure have awakened the senses of tens of millions of Americans who still revere the Holy Bible as the literal word of God, and whom are repulsed by talk of same-sex sex, otherwise known as sin in the Good Book, and in many major religions even today.

Unfortunately, tolerance is on holiday in the minds of far too many liberals who view free speech as a fundamental right for those who espouse progressive ideals, but whom would deny equal free speech rights to those opposed to leftist agenda items and Marxist politicians.

Which brings us to the disputed War on Christmas, a war that liberals dismiss as folly, mere figments of right-wing hysteria as they (liberals) deliberately use every ploy in the book to keep nativity scenes, Christmas carols, Christmas trees, and anything even remotely resembling endorsement of Christ, from the public consciousness.

Regrettably, the secularization of Christmas has worked as more and more businesses are reverting to “Happy Holiday” rather than Merry Christmas to avoid offending.

Avoid offending? Christmas is about God incarnate, the Prince of peace and love!

But for the sake of tolerance, perhaps the laws should be strengthened to give greater emphasis to diversity and non-Christians?

Perhaps one who goes about wickedly shouting “MERRY CHRISTMAS” should be prosecuted for a hate crime?


Sorry, Virginia, When It Comes to Health Care, There Is NO Santa Clause!

By John W. Lillpop

Millions of Americans were deliberately deceived and lied to by Barack Obama and the Democrats into believing that access to quality health care was a constitutional right, AND that it was free!

In fact, just as the Obamacare rollout was imploding in October, the Obamacare web site continued to boast of FREE health care!

That boast was a reflection of the President’s specious sales pitch which, remember, promised to insure 30 million previously uninsured while simultaneously REDUCING overall costs!

The fact that Obama’s lie was actually believed by millions of voters is an appalling indictment on lack of sophistication in our society.

It is also a shocking and highly distressing indictment of the lack of independent and objective review of government by the mainstream media!

Where in hell were the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, and all of the other media outlets whose cynicism and pessimism would have descended on the White House like an Al-Quaeda terror attack had such an idiotic promise been made by a Republican in the Oval Office?

Why did warning alarms not sound when an inexperienced community organizer promised to cut costs while adding 30 million users of ANY commodity, much less health care?

How come Nancy Pelosi’s imbecilic “We have to pass it to find out what’s in it” prattle did not resonate with responsible journalists?

Or are there no longer any such beings (responsible journalists) in Washington these days?

Sadly, the bitter, bitter truth must be absorbed at Christmas, which is supposed to be the “Merriest Time of the Year!”

Thanks to progressive lies and incompetence, the new Christmas message to the masses is:

Sorry, Virginia, When It Comes to Health Care, There Is NO Santa Clause, and NO independent press to protect the people!

Grim but true: Santa Clause and the free press are no more!


What If Obamacare Had Existed Christmas Eve, 0000?

Satire By John W. Lillpop

As we Americans struggle to preserve our rich cultural traditions and heritage surrounding Christmas, there are times when the struggle seems too hard, the load just too heavy.

For example, one wonders if it is worth it upon hearing that another whacked-out liberal judge has determined that the nativity scene is unconstitutional.

Mind you, not just insensitive to non-Christians, but unconstitutional for heaven's sake!

Not so many years ago, the word unconstitutional was reserved for major injustices that really harmed people. Heinous acts like slavery, John Crow law, or child labor abuse for example.

But times have changed.

Three years ago, we heard of a rabbi in Washington state who threatened to sue because of fifteen Christmas trees enjoyed by the overwhelming majority of the public at the Seattle airport.

"Treeless in Seattle," was apparently this rabbi's passion.

Question: Why would an alleged “man of faith” act to deny so many people the pleasure of seeing a simple, unobtrusive symbol just because the symbol did not immediately conjure up images of his particular faith?

Even more curious: How can the story of Jesus, a champion of love and goodwill, and himself a Jew, drive otherwise good people to such fierce loathing?

And how does one confront such narrow-minded, selfish, mean-spirited thinking without going barking mad?

One way to avoid insanity is to fantasize what the first Christmas might have been had Obamacare and progressive idiocy been in place the night Jesus was born.

The Christmas story might have included nuttiness such as this:

Upon entering Bethlehem, Mary and Joseph would have been stopped by activists from Planned Parenthood. The unmarried couple would have been reminded of the growing problem with overpopulation, including demands on finite resources and added pollution.

Mary would have been encouraged to abort the unborn fetus, and Planned Parenthood would have offered to pay for the procedure with tax money stolen from the Romans.

Meanwhile, a corrupt liberal judge (aren't they all?) in Nazareth would have issued a restraining order to prevent the three wise men from entering the city where the Savior was born.

Citing the lack of any women, blacks, Asians, Hispanics, gays, transsexuals, Jihadist dudes, or blind and handicapped Buddhists among the three wise acres, the judge would have given the trio twelve hours to submit an acceptable affirmative action plan, or be forced to leave the Holy land.

All mirth, gold and other gifts would have been impounded and stored in a local Mosque, pending final disposition by the court.

That same judge would have also ordered Mary to submit to a full gynecological examination by a licensed physician to determine the veracity of her claim to be a virgin.

The judge ruled that this exam was essential to maintain the integrity of birth and death records in Nazareth, and to establish a basis for royalty payments owed Nazareth when the Jesus story was added to the Holy Bible, and movie rights sold to Hollywood Jews.

Being an obedient and faithful woman of the Lord, Mary reported to the local medical center for the required examination, but was shocked to learn that her health-care coverage had been cancelled because of a new universal mandate which did not cover virginity examinations.

It was explained to Mary that virginity was not considered a reasonable expectation since the new health law screwed EVERYONE, regardless of religion, income, blah, blah, blah, EXCEPT the heathens who enacted the silly law.

Therefore, Mary would not qualify for generous subsidies offered under the Nazareth health exchange scam. Her examination was to be funded by a lien placed on the impounded mirth, gold, and other gifts.

Meanwhile, ACLU Lawyers in Bethlehem would have sued the innkeeper who turned Mary and Joseph away. The suit would allege that there was, in fact, plenty of room at the inn, but that Mary was discriminated against solely because she was an unmarried, pregnant, middle-eastern woman of color who spoke perfect Yiddish, but not a word of Italian or French.

Even back then, being bilingual was seen as a mark of sophistication and economic stability by liberal nut balls.

Joseph would have been required to pay a special “Ass Transit Fee”—not a tax, mind you—owing to the fact that the donkey carrying the blessed mother-to-be was not properly licensed in Bethlehem.

The local tax collector was known as the “Ass Taxer,” a term that still applies to most American Democrats whom are called Taxing Asses.

Joseph and Mary would have been forced to leave Bethlehem earlier than originally planned, because a local bureaucrat had determined that their donkey was releasing unhealthy levels of toxic gases, indelicately called “farts” in our enlightened times.

Such emissions were thought to be a major factor in clinical depressions, and were also implicated in a phenomenon called “Global Cooling," which liberals insisted would destroy the planet by the year 0010 unless immediate actions were taken.

Finally, a band of homeless Islamofascist gypsies would have been arrested for conspiring to destroy the Baby Jesus by placing a Muslim baby with a treatable, but contagious, disease into the manger immediately next to that of Jesus.

This was the first recorded instance of Muslims using children on suicide missions to kill innocent Jews.

Of course, the arrested Islamofascists eventually sued for discrimination based on religious intolerance. And won!

Praise be to God that Obamacare and the ACLU did not exist in their present form on Christmas Eve, 0000!


He Shall Be Called Barack, the Anointed One, Allah Willing!

Satire by John W. Lillpop

August 4, 1961. Shall this date live in infamy along with December 7, 1941 and September 11, 2001?

Or should America be celebrating the birth of Barack Hussein Obama with the same gusto, reverence, and passion reserved for Christmas?

Do we Americans need a new national holiday--Barackmas--to celebrate this most special birthday?

Under this tax and deficit neutral scheme, everyone would get August 4th off. A small $500 "gratitude fee" would collected by the IRS to pay for the frolicking.

If all of this sounds far fetched, please consider the following scrolls found in Mohamed Attah's safe deposit box at the Bank of Baghdad:

And He Shall Be Called Barack, The Anointed One:

"And it came to pass, in the appointed time, that a child was born unto a humble servant of Allah in a land called Kenya. And the assembled 72 virgin angels tended to the mother and child, and sang in unison in praise of Allah for blessing the Faithful with this most holy of beings.

"And the virgin angels saith unto his mother, "Take ye this new born, the most favored of Allah, to an island where trade winds blow and birth certificates are readily forged.

"He shall be called Barack, which means the Anointed One, and his birthplace shall be recorded as Honolulu, Hawaii to protect Faithful Kenyans from the ravages of evil crusaders, who will be known as "birthers."

"His powers shall be great and he shall be called upon to deliver the Faithful from the ravages of a dyslexic cowboy from Texas who destroyed many Muslims in order to shield Zionist pigs from justice.

"That evil man is the anti-Allah who hides behind a Bush to escape exposure. He must be blamed for all manner of sin and Barack must be held blameless for all woes to visit America, the home of the unfaithful and the land of the fraud."

"The Anointed One shall bring with him a sword with which to slay the moguls of capitalism and free the unwashed masses from insurance companies, Wall Street tycoons, automobile corporations and other agents of tyranny, except for labor unions which shall be rewarded and encouraged to multiple in great numbers, Allah willing.

"His enemies will be many and powerful, but none shall prevail because the Anointed One shall own a huge inventory of Executive Orders which can be used to subvert the will of infidels in the US Senate and US House, Allah willing.

"The Anointed One shall reign over America for eight years, or until the US Treasury runs out of money, whichever comes first.

"Go ye, therefore, two by two and preach the Gospel of Barack near and far to all who would hear you. To those who would not abide you, shake the dust from your feet and report the incident to the nearest ACORN center.

"Declare the good news to all, being this: On this night in a lonely mud hut in Kenya, Allah delivered unto us a child to rebuke all that malarkey about a baby Jew birthed by a virgin come to save the world."

And his name shall be BARACK, and he shall be Allah's gift to the Faithful.

Amen and amen!"

Barack Obama: Using Tyranny to Undo Tyranny Before an Election!

By John W. Lillpop

There he goes again!

After adamantly refusing to negotiate with Congressional Republicans seeking a delay of Obamacare mandates in order to avert a government shutdown last fall, Barack Obama has spent much of the last three months delaying, modifying, and ignoring his very own ‘signature’ health care law.

While Obama would not budge at all when it came to considering GOP concerns about the impact of Obamacare on the health of the American people, his resolve has been demolished by at- risk Democrats whose political prospects for the 2014 mid-term elections are turning to mush by the disastrous roll out and subsequent implementation of the unmitigated disaster known as the Affordable Care Act.

Rather than manning up to his failures and working with Congress to fix the Obamacare mess, Obama continues to attempt to fix tyranny with even more tyranny, as reported at the reference:
Hundreds of thousands of people whose health plans are being canceled because their coverage doesn’t meet Obamacare rules will be exempt next year from the U.S. mandate that all Americans carry medical insurance.

People losing coverage will now be allowed to buy bare-bones “catastrophic” insurance that the law usually limits to those younger than age 30, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said yesterday. Others can opt out completely without the threat of the fines being imposed next year on the uninsured as part of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.”

The big question: Does the rule of law mean nothing to this renegade president? Or to the Congressional Republicans whom have been elected to oversee the executive branch of government?

Ref: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-20/obama-aides-say-more-to-gain-coverage-under-aca-than-canceled.html


Nancy Pelosi’s “Bare Cupboard” Folly Exposed in Tom Coburn’s “Waste Book”

By John W. Lillpop

Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) has a long and storied history of making outrageous, inflammatory, and just plain stupid remarks from her isolated tower of power on Capitol Hill.

Even so, few of Pelosi’s misinformed blurbs can compare to the sheer idiocy of her claim last September 22 when she declared that the “cupboard is bare” and that no further cuts to the federal budget could be countenanced.

As reported at the reference, Pelosi said the following:

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi says Republican-led efforts to rein in government spending are pointless because there is nothing left to cut in the almost $4 trillion-a-year federal budget.

“The cupboard is bare. There’s no more cuts to make. It’s really important that people understand that,” Mrs. Pelosi, California Democrat, said in an interview broadcast Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“We cannot have cuts just for the sake of cuts.”

With a crippling 17 trillion (and growing) deficit hovering above untold future generations of Americans, it is remarkable that any reasonably-intelligent, responsible office holder would actually believe that anyone is pursuing “cuts for the sake of cuts.”

Then again, Pelosi is neither reasonably-intelligent nor responsible!

Just in time for Christmas, Pelosi’s foolishness was exposed by Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) who released his annual oversight report “Waste Book 2013” highlighting 100 examples of wasteful and low-priority spending totaling nearly $30 billion.

As reported at reference 2, Coburn said the following:

“While politicians in Washington spent much of 2013 complaining about sequestration’s impact on domestic programs and our national defense, we still managed to provide benefits to the Fort Hood shooter, study romance novels, help the State Department buy Facebook fans and even help NASA study Congress,” said Dr. Coburn.

“Had Congress, in particular, been focused on doing its job of setting priorities and cutting the kind of wasteful spending outlined in this report, we could have avoided both a government shutdown and a flawed budget deal that was designed to avert a shutdown. The nearly $30 billion in questionable and lower-priority spending in Wastebook 2013 is a small fraction of the more than $200 billion we throw away every year through fraud, waste, duplication and mismanagement. There is more than enough stupidity and incompetence in government to allow us to live well below the budget caps. What’s lacking is the common sense and courage in Washington to make those choices – and passage of fiscally-responsible spending bills – possible,” said Dr. Coburn.

“This report speaks volumes about why confidence in government is at an all-time low. The hard truth is we’d much rather borrow than cut. The American people are right to expect more,” said Dr. Coburn.”

Examples of wasteful spending are highlighted in detail at the reference.

One additional federal study is urgently needed: How Pea-brained, Nanny-State Marxists from San Francisco Are Elected to Congress And How to Prevent the Spread of Pelosiism Throughout America!

Such a study would surely confirm that the most dangerous “bare cupboard” in America is between the ears of Nancy Pelosi!

Reference 1 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/sep/22/rep-nancy-pelosi-nothing-left-cut-budget-cupboard-/#ixzz2nw7tIPSg

Reference 2 http://www.coburn.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/pressreleases?ContentRecord_id=e7359436-1572-414e-8acc-0222cad1c7d5


“White” Christmas Anything But Merry and Bright in This Community!

By John W. Lillpop

In this, the most wonderful time of the year, where peace and good will toward men are supposed to be omnipresent themes, an ugly alliance between race-phobia and Jesus-phobia are threatening to fundamentally transform this most cherished season into a celebration of hatred, bigotry, and mean-spirited pettiness.

As reported at the reference, an Albuquerque teacher is the latest victim of the anti-Christmas pandemic plowing through otherwise respectable communities:

A suburban Albuquerque teacher who told a black student that Santa Claus is white has been placed on paid administrative leave.

Rio Rancho school district spokeswoman Kim Vesely confirmed on Tuesday that the teacher is out of the classroom while the incident is being investigated.

The teacher's comments came after students at Cleveland High School were told they could come to class dressed as Santa, an elf or a reindeer.

Michael Rougier says when his ninth-grade son, Christopher, arrived with a Santa hat and beard, the teacher asked, "Don't you know Santa Claus is white? Why are you wearing that?"

While the teacher involved was, at best, insensitive and terse, it hardly seems appropriate in this most wonderful time of the year, to keep he or she out of the classroom, in an where era quality education is at a premium.

To spokeswoman Vesely, just how are the students, including the black Christopher, served by disrupting the learning process just to pacify mean-spirited political correctness? Where is the lesson plan for tolerance and inclusiveness?

Why not negotiate issuance of an appropriate apology to soothe the ruffled feathers, rather than making a silly remark into a national scandal?

As for Michael Rougier, father of Christopher, here’s hoping that Santa fills your stocking-- with chunks of white coal!

Read more: http://www.myfoxdc.com/story/24242269/nm-teacher-who-said-santa-is-white-on-paid-leave#ixzz2nqiwxTl4
Follow us: @myfoxdc on Twitter | myfoxdc on Facebook


Morality 101, from the Fractured Mind of Nancy Pelosi!

By John W. Lillpop

Advanced age and declining mental acumen have not prevented, or even slowed down, Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-California) from growing her reputation as America’s queen of moon bat idiocy and foremost advocate of nanny-state Marxism.

In her latest tirade against responsible governance, the addled lady bemoaned the fact that the much- ballyhooed budget “deal” does not make unemployment benefits a lifetime entitlement.

Said she as reported at the reference:

CNSNews.com) - House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) says the Republican refusal to include unemployment benefits in the Ryan-Murray budget deal is immoral.

"It's interesting to note that they rejected unemployment insurance -- this is so unconscionable, it's practically at the level of immoral to do. The people who work hard, play by the rules, lose their job through no fault of their own, are not able to get -- continue to get an unemployment insurance check."

Again, as I say, not only is it a bad idea from a humanity standpoint, but from an economic standpoint. For every dollar spent on unemployment benefits, it grows the economy by $1.52, a dollar and a half."

Only a demented leftist, unfortunate enough to be cursed with Pelosi’s intellectual limitations, would see unemployment funding as a practical solution to sluggish economic growth and stalled prosperity!

Why not cut taxes, trim down anti-growth government regulations, and let free enterprise work, as it was intended to, Madam Pelosi?

Even more distressing than the Pelosi take on economic matters is her warped notion of morality.

Lest we forget, Nancy Pelosi sees abortion rights as “scared” to the cause of liberated women; this despite the teachings of the Catholic Church of which Pelosi claims to be a devout member!

Thus, according to Pelosi, willfully killing a human life may be acceptable, even ‘sacred’, whereas limiting unemployment payments is somehow ‘immoral’?

Nancy Pelosi needs to retire from political life and join a circus where her fractured thinking and clown-like demeanor would be fully appreciated!

Reference: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/pelosi-gop-failure-extend-unemployment-benefits-practically-immoral#sthash.opPOOuGl.dpuf


BREAKING NEWS: Judge Derails Obama 4th Amendment Nazi Machine!

By John W. Lillpop

Barack Obama, already up to his neck in a plethora of “phony scandals,” has a new headache to fret about, just in time for his Christmas invasion of Oahu, Hawaii for a 17-day respite.

As reported at the reference, America’s alleged “constitutional scholar” and most proliferate violator of the Constitution in the history of US presidents, was slapped down by a federal judge for wanton abuses of the 4th Amendment, carried out in Obama’s name by NSA squirrels against innocent American citizens:

A federal judge ruled Monday that the National Security Agency program which collects information on nearly all telephone calls made to, from or within the United States is likely unconstitutional.

U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon found that the program appears to violate the Fourth Amendment ban on unreasonable searches and seizures. He also said the Justice Department had failed to demonstrate that collecting the information had helped to head off terrorist attacks.

Acting on a lawsuit brought by conservative legal activist Larry Klayman, Leon issued a preliminary injunction barring the NSA from collecting so-called metadata pertaining to the Verizon accounts of Klayman and one of his clients.

However, the judge stayed the order to allow for an appeal.

“I cannot imagine a more ‘indiscriminate’ and ‘arbitrary invasion’ than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval,” wrote Leon, an appointee of President George W. Bush.

The preliminary injunction Leon granted Monday does not require him to make a definitive ruling on the constitutional questions in the case, but does take account of which side he believes is more likely to prevail.

Once again, American Exceptionalism is rewarded as a high-school drop with high-tech skills named Edward Snowden manages to outsmart and out-maneuver the "smartest man" in the room!

Take THAT Barack!

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/12/national-security-agency-phones-judge-101203.html#ixzz2ng9kHzTL

VP Biden Gropes for Way to Knock Obamacare off Front Pages!

By John W. Lillpop

Few would argue with the assertion that Vice President Joe Biden has been a good and loyal soldier in the Barack Obama war on America over the past five plus years.

Most of Biden’s efforts on behalf of The One involve benign lying and cajoling on a variety of sensitive issues such as the economy, the withering of the American Dream, and US capitulation to Marxism.

Aside from an occasional and, mostly non- lethal, faux pas, Biden has provided much-needed comedic relief from the maddening arrogance and insolence of the poser now occupying the Oval House.

In other words, Biden has made it tolerable, if not fashionable, to “Embrace the Suck,” in order to survive the blistering tyranny and insufferable criminality of Barack Hussein Obama.

Unfortunately for Biden and the O team, Biden’s latest headline-grabbing antic, no doubt choreographed to drive the Obamacare news off the front pages, appears to involve grabbing of more than just new headlines.

Specifically, as reported at the reference, the VEEP may be pushing the envelope a bit too aggressively:

Sure, he likely didn’t mean anything overtly sexual by it. But Vice President Joe Biden is a folksy kind of guy who has officially entered dirty old man territory and done something sure to elicit laughs within the White House Press Corps.

Look how he’s manhandling The Hill‘s White House Correspondent Aime Parnes for this photograph taken at a recent holiday party that she posted on her Facebook page.

For most people’s tastes he’s grazing way too close to the vicinity of her abdomen. And watch her reaction. Is it shock, awe, utter disbelief? Whatever the expression, she appeared to roll with it with her hands firmly in control of his at least until the shot was over. If we were to guess her words we’d wager, “OH F–K SO THIS IS REALLY HAPPENING.”

One can guess that VP Biden's corresponding words might be, "This is a big F******" Deal!"

Mrs. Biden's thoughts would surely be even more colorful; but would probably be totally unsuitable for a family publication!

Reference: http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/16/vice-president-joe-biden-gropes-white-house-reporter/#ixzz2neGxpAL9


New Worries for the Poor: Choosing Between Health Care and Fast- Food Served by $15 an Hour Tyrants?

By John W. Lillpop

From the “unintended consequences” folder for progressive idiocy:

Should the unwashed masses succeed in forcing businesses to pay $15 an hour minimum wage to unskilled, untalented, undeserving flippers of burgers and those who wash dishes for a living, impacted business owners will have no choice but to pass the additional expense onto the consuming public.

Which means that the poor, and near poor, will no longer be able to afford delicacies offered by fancy eateries like McDonald’s, Burger King, Jumbo Jack and other fast-food joints!

So what is the point?

Raising the minimum wage will only harm the poor because most well-to-do folks do not eat fast food to begin with, or if they do, will be able to easily afford the extra burden of Progressive idiocy gone wrong.

Another potential time bomb brought to the fore by liberalism: The poor will need every spare dime just to afford health care when Obamacare hits the streets on January 1.

Thus, the poor will be forced to decide between inferior Marxist health care and that burger and fries combo served by $15 an hour tyrants who cannot afford to eat where they work.

And so it is that the word “Progressive” continues to be misappropriated to describe ideologies that keep the poor desperately poor and create even more poverty, which makes work for goofy community organizers who spend their lives giving other people’s money away—for votes!

As Nancy Pelosi would say, “Embrace the Suck!,” and vote Democrat!


Top Ten Issues More “Ridiculous” than GOP Opposition to Budget “Deal”!

By John W. Lillpop

On Wednesday, Speaker of the US House John Boehner(R-Ohio,), castigated fellow Republicans who dared express dissatisfaction with the budget “deal” worked out between Democrat Patty Murray and Republican Paul Ryan, a deal so awful that it was hailed by Barack Obama!

Boehner belched out his criticism of GOP conservatives with the following impolite words(reference 1):

"They're using the American people for their own purposes. This is ridiculous," Boehner said at a press conference with other members of House Republican leadership on Wednesday.

Ridiculous, Mr. Speaker?

Good grief, this so-called “deal” savages sequesters, the only policy that has actually reduced the mounting federal deficit in recent times, and pays but a meager pittance to really cutting the federal deficit, now hovering over the heads of future American generations at 17 trillion green backs!

What IS truly ridiculous is that an alleged leader of the Republican opposition has apparently lost all cognizance of conservative values and is now in the business of carrying water for our scandal-ridden Marxist President!

Other items in the news which are far more ridiculous than opposition to the budget scam include:

( )Obamacare and it’s potential harm to the health and welfare of the American people;

( )Continued presence of HHS hag Kathleen Sebelius on the US Government payroll AND, in fact,on US soil;

( ) Obama’s “Interim” Agreement with Iran which may be the greatest threat to US Homeland Security since the events of 9/11/01;

( )Willful abandonment of Israel and other US Allies;

( )John Kerry, Harry Reid, and Nancy Pelosi;

( )50 million Americans on food stamps, millions more on welfare;

( )Amnesty for invading criminals;

( )The incoherent mess called US foreign policy;

( )Unresolved crimes involving Benghazi, unconstitutional abuse of power re the IRS scandal, “Fast and Furious,” and other high crimes and misdemeanors!, and

( )Global warming farce.

Get it ,Mr. Speaker?

The LAST thing you should be worried about are heroic efforts by patriotic Republicans to contain the Obama mad cow plague, which, unless it is resisted, threatens our very existence!

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/budget-deal-boehner-conservative-groups-heritage-club-for-growth-2013-12#ixzz2nI5Fj8LE


More Embarrassing: Obama “Selfie” or GOP Budget “Deal”?

By John W. Lillpop

After watching Barack Obama disgrace the US presidency even further with his nutty ‘Selfie’ during the memorial service for Nelson Mandela, true American patriots are owed an answer.

Namely, how much more humiliation and embarrassment can this self-absorbed, spoiled brat dump on we the people and our blessed nation?

Is there no bottom to the Obama madness and his destructive reign of ruin?

Have we not suffered enough, what with the colossal failure known as Obamacare and its potential to disrupt 17 percent of the national economy, the muddled and incoherent foreign policy which treats long-time allies as foes while favoring terrorist states, the dismantling of the American dream in order to placate the less capable and less diligent at the expense of the bright and successful, and the wanton destruction of American values and traditions in order to serve wrong-minded multiculturalism?

Lest we who lean to the Right get too full of ourselves, let us remember that while Obama was acting the fool in Johannesburg, leaders of the GOP were working overtime on the Hill to take the “Grand” out of the Grand Old Party by announcing a budget “deal” which scuttles, at least in part, the sequesters, the only tool which has been even remotely effective in cutting insane spending.

As reported at the reference:

House and Senate negotiators unveiled an $85 billion agreement late Tuesday to fund federal agencies through the fall of 2015, averting another government shutdown and ending the cycle of crisis that has paralyzed Washington for much of the past three years.

In a rare display of bipartisan cooperation, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) stood side by side in the Capitol with Senate Budget Committee Chairman Patty Murray (D-Wash.) to announce the deal, which would cancel half of the sharp spending cuts known as the sequester for the current fiscal year.

Ryan called the agreement “a step in the right direction” that protects the Pentagon from fresh cuts set to hit in January while trimming deficits by more than $20 billion over the next decade.”

20 billion out of 17 trillion over ten years is a step in the right direction?

Baloney, Paul Ryan!



In Pursuit of a Christmas Miracle: Ending Tyrannical Abuse!

By John W. Lillpop

How is it that we, the people of the most prosperous, successful, and advanced democracy in history are unable to dispose of the most contemptible, incompetent, lying, anti-rule of law, tyrant imaginable?

Just how clever were the Founding Fathers if the very survival of our Republic may necessitate the use of uncivil disobedience by the masses to purge the government of evil men and women who refuse to consider the well-being and will of the governed?

Whatever happened to the notion that governance was somehow based on the “consent of the governed”?

Clearly, the Founders were counting on the good faith and conscience of leaders and their followers to “do the right thing” when the trust and confidence of the American people were ruptured beyond repair, as was the case in 1974 when Richard M. Nixon was driven out of office by leaders of the Republican Party whom acted in the best interests of the nation, rather than hoarding partisan power, by escorting the beleaguered Nixon to his helicopter for the one-way trip back to San Clemente, California.

However, the Founders could not have imagined the ascension of a tyrant like Barack Hussein Obama, a man so self-absorbed and vain that the interests of the American people are not even considered, much less made an important priority.

What might our Constitution look like if the Founders had been cynical enough to imagine that a personage such as Barack Obama would seize power and be supported by a gaggle of equally-detestable partisans who would sustain the tyrant at the expense of 330 million of we the people?

Yet, here we are in 2013, seemingly helpless to free ourselves from the tyrannical abuses of an embittered man of privilege who, despite his unearned power and wealth, has neither love nor respect for the history, traditions, or values of the people whose lives he governs with such reckless abandon!

Is there no hope? Is change for the better out of the question? Must America endure three more years before common sense, humility, and the American way can be resurrected?

Thankfully, at least one retired Army General is offering hope and change of the sort that would rid America of the Barack Obama fairy tale and bring a measure of Americanism back to America.

As reported at the reference:

WASHINGTON – A retired Army general is calling for the “forced resignations” of President Obama, other administration officials and the leadership of Congress for the direction they’re taking the nation, his list of grievances including the systematic political purge of hundreds of senior military officers in the U.S. military.

Retired Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely told WND he is calling for nationwide rallies and protests to demand the resignations and added that a peaceful “civil uprising is still not out of question.”

n his capacity as chairman of the organization Stand Up America, Vallely issued what he termed a “National Call to Action” to force the resignations of Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Vallely, formerly the deputy commanding general of Pacific Command, said the current crop of leaders must be forced to resign by the “demand resignation” process, which he explained requires massive grass-roots protests and social networking. As an example, he cited the public and media pressure that led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon.

Impeachment, Vallely said, is not a viable option because of “partisan politics.”

“Our federal government continues down the path of destroying America,” he said. “Americans must now stand up and put America back on the right track.”

In issuing his national call to action, Vallely said the federal government has not subsided in “sucking the oxygen” out of America.

“And we call to action all branches of government to do your constitutional duties and not be led astray in the cultural and moral decay of America. We have witnessed far too many lies,” he said, as well as “deception and the corruption of the republic.”

Vallely reminds Americans that the Declaration of Independence itself states that whenever “any Form of Government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem more likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.”

Vallely said the nation he long defended is self-destructing “before our very eyes,” because of “our inept and incompetent leadership in Washington.”

“The battle is on,” he added, “and we shall not retreat.”

Hear, hear! We shall not retreat!

What a magnificent thought in this, the season of miracles!

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/general-lets-make-obama-resign/#LudIUGX6Jb5BPvFe.99