Neil Cavuto 1, Barack Obama 0!

By John W. Lillpop

In the Youtube video below, FOX News host Neil Cavuto delivers a blistering rebuttal to Barack Obama’s outrageous attempt to blame  FOX News for the Obama legacy of failure, particularly as concerns ObamaCare.

Delivered with respect for the Presidency, but appropriate scorn for the lies, incompetence, and lousy math, Cavuto hits the mark again and again.

The video:


Congratulations and thanks, Neil Cavuto!


Democrat Rationalizes Illegal Aliens: Who Will Clean Our Hotel Rooms, Do Landscaping?

By John W. Lillpop

Liberal politicians who favor the unbridled admission of illegal aliens into America at the will and whimsy of the illegals, have long claimed the moral high ground. Indeed, liberals generally claim ‘humanitarian’ concern for the non-English speaking, unskilled invaders who violate US borders and immigration laws at will.

The truth, of course, is that Democrats look to illegals as a source for growing the Democrat Party and imposing socialism, and all it’s evils, on the American people, indefinitely.

In truth, progressives seek single-party monopoly over the Republic at the expense of hundreds of millions of American citizens born and raised here, and with legitimate reason for being here.

In truth, the so-called compassion for illegals is based on an obtuse, unquenchable lust for political power, and squelching of ‘racists’ who demand enforcement of the rule of law and immigration policy based on what is best for America.

A recent episode of foolish liberal talk by a Democrat from Florida serves to expose the “compassion” nonsense.

Specifically, some of candidate Alex Sink’s answers at an immigration debate, sponsored by multiple chambers of commerce, are puncturing the notion that liberals favor loose immigration enforcement because of concern  for the little guys whom have invaded America.

As reported at the reference, here’s what Sink, running against Republican David Jolly in the heated special election race for Congressional District 13, had to say about immigration:

“Immigration reform is important in our country. It’s one of the main agenda items of the Beaches Chamber of Commerce for obvious reasons. Because we have a lot of employers over on the beaches that rely upon workers and especially in this high-growth environment, where are you going to get people to work to clean our hotel rooms or do our landscaping? And we don’t need to put those employers in a position of hiring undocumented and illegal workers.”

Poor Ms. Sink!

What about income inequality and trolling for slave labor, Ms. Sink?

Have you no shame?


Eric Holder’s Latest Attack on Rule of Law Drives Talk of Impeachment!

By John W. Lillpop

In a stunning act of defiance against the rule of law, Attorney General Eric Holder recently addressed a gathering of state attorneys-general and essentially invited the gathered to ignore state laws banning same-sex marriage.

See reference at http://cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/holder-invites-state-ags-do-he-did-refuse-defend-laws-banning-same-sex#sthash.QQjBfXLd.dpuf

Imagine that. The Attorney General of the United States advising attorneys-general from the states to ignore the law based on his and the President’s political bias and leftist ideology!

And to hell with the rule of law as codified by elected officials of we the people in accordance with Democratic principles!

Has there ever been a more contemptible, out-of-touch person in government, other than The One with the Pen and Phone obsession who views the Congress, the Constitution, and laws he disagrees with as unwelcome intrusions into his personal right to rule by tyrannical fiat?

According to a coalition of black pastors, Holder’s latest outrage is sufficiently untoward as to justify an aggressive plan for impeachment of the AG who already holds the dishonor of being held in contempt of the US House of Representatives.

As reported at the reference in part:

A coalition of black pastors announced on Tuesday at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C. that they are launching a campaign to gather one million signatures on a petition calling for the impeachment of Attorney General Eric Holder for violating his oath of office by trying "to coerce states to fall in line with the same-sex 'marriage' agenda."

"President Obama and Attorney General Eric Holder have turned their backs on the values the American people hold dear, values particularly cherished in the black community: values like marriage, which should be strengthened and promoted, rather than weakened and undermined," says a statement by the Coalition of African American Pastors that has been posted online with their impeachment petition.

"Our nation calls for the building up of a healthier marriage culture; instead, our elected leaders are bent on destroying marriage, remaking it as a genderless institution and reorienting it to be all about the desires of adults rather than the needs of children," says the coalition.

"In pursuing this intention, the president and his administration are trampling the rule of law. Attorney General Holder in particular has used the influence of his office and role as the chief law enforcement figure in our nation to try to coerce states to fall in line with the same-sex ‘marriage’ agenda," says the coalition. :Millions of voters in 30 states have voted to defend marriage as the union of one man and one woman, but Attorney General Holder is attempting single-handedly to throw those votes away!

"For abandoning the oath he swore in taking office and his duty to defend the common good, Attorney General Holder should be impeached by Congress," says the coalition. "CAAP is calling on all men and women of good will to sign the following petition urging Congress to take action against the Attorney General’s lawlessness today!"

The Rev. Bill Owens, founder and president of CAAP, said that political leaders in Washington have not held Holder accountable.”

Holder and Obama generally scream “racist” at those who disagree with their crazy ideas.

This time, the complaints come from African-Americans of faith and morality!

So what is the excuse this time?

Reference: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/penny-starr/black-pastors-impeach-holder


Ted Nugent Needs to Apologize to Innocent Mongrels!

By John W. Lillpop

Over the years, Ted Nugent has voiced many outrageous, over the top sentiments, most of which were spot on when it comes to substance, but woefully lacking in PC acumen.

Which means that in most instances, I agree wholeheartedly with Nugent. After all, adhering to PC speech and thinking is how America has devolved into a 3rd-world sewer controlled by Marxist idiots.

Still, in his most recent manic episode, Ted strayed over the line when he called Barack Obama a “subhuman mongrel.”

It is my considered opinion that Nugent took an unnecessary, unkind swipe at the mongrel demographic when he compared them with the worst president and among the worst persons in world history.

Had he been acting in sincerity born of wisdom, Nugent would have apologized to all subhuman mongrels for his defamatory remarks.

He would have made it clear that Obama would have to undergo intensive rehabilitation for a decade or so in order to elevate his status to mongrel.

On behalf on Nugent and all patriots, I hereby apologize to all mongrels and mongrel-wanna bees!


FLOTUS: ObamaCare Designed for “Knuckle Heads”!

By John W. Lillpop

Critical thinkers from all political vantage points have long pointed out that ObamaCare is based on the assumption that young, “invincible” voters are essentially sheep whom can be counted on to do really foolish things.

Like paying outrageous amounts for Obamacare health care coverage in order to subsidize older, less healthy Americans.

It’s wealth redistribution disguised as progress, with the young an healthy left holding the financial bag for those with the temerity to grow hold and less healthy.

Democrats generally scoffed at the notion that the current generation of young were being offered as sacrificial lambs for the codger demographic AND future generations of youth.

However, Michele Obama made her debut on the new Tonight Show on Thursday and used the occasion to reiterate the leftist opportunist enslavement of the young.

Her thesis: The young are knuckle heads, so its perfectly OK for big, nanny-state government to abuse and mislead them!

As reported at the reference:

First Lady Michele Obama in an interview on the “Tonight Show” joked that young people were “knuckleheads” who often had unexpected accidents and needed Obamacare.

“A lot of young people think they're invincible, but the truth is that young people are knuckleheads,” Obama told new host Jimmy Fallon on the late night show.

‘They’re the ones who are cooking for the first time and slice their finger open, they’re dancing on the bar stools,’ she continued to laughter. “But while young people think they’re invincible, they’re not.”

The first lady has taken a prominent role in the administration’s push for more young people to sign up for Obamacare’s insurance exchanges. But the administration is still behind their targets.

Young, healthier consumers are needed to enroll to keep the health law afloat and balance the larger numbers of older, sicker patients expected to sign up.

President Obama on Thursday also said that Obamacare enrollments were “close to 4 million” suggesting a continued surge in sign-ups, but leaving the administration still short of their 7 million target by the end of March 31.

The first lady’s comments came during a light interview with the new host of the iconic late night TV show.”

The Young are knuckle heads are they, Mrs. Obama?

And you are an intellectual elitist who has just gone on national TV in a desperate attempt to get enough “knuckle heads “ to sign up for this Ponzi scheme in order to make it work?

With all due respect, Mrs. Obama, but the real “knuckle heads” are folks like you and the president and most Democrats who think that young Americans can be lied to and fooled into accepting Marxist health care!



Forget Green, Mr. President: Focus on Red, White, & Blue!

By John W. Lillpop

Whilst those few Americans whom are able to find work in the Obama-devastated economy slave feverishly to hold on to middle-class live styles, our Community Organizer/ Marxist Savant continues to abscond funds from hard-working American taxpayers in order to fun his green pipe dreams--in foreign nations, no less!

As reported at the reference, Obama’s investment myopia has once again dinged Americans in the pocket book to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars:

The Chinese auto conglomerate Wanxiang Group has bought electric automaker Fisker Automotive, marking the second time they snatched up a failed green firm that received taxpayer dollars.

The bankrupt Fisker was sold to Wanxiang last week for $149.2 million and the sale was approved by the bankruptcy court on Tuesday. Last year, the Energy Department’s $192 million of Fisker was sold of to Wanxiang for $25 million netting taxpayers a $139 million loss.

This is the second time a green energy company that got a loan guarantee from the Obama administration was sold off to Chinese firms garnering criticism from conservatives that hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted for the benefit of foreign businessmen.”

“In 2009, Secretary Chu promised American taxpayers that a $528.7 million conditional loan for Fisker Automotive would create or save 5,000 jobs,” Tennessee Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn told The Daily Caller News Foundation.

“The height of Fisker’s employment barely reached over 200 employees,” Blackburn added. “The only thing worse than these continued broken promises and lack of accountability from this administration is that yet another company that received taxpayer funding will be sold to China’s Wanxiang goup.”

Early last year, electric car battery maker A123 Systems was sold off to Wanxiang Group, which is owned by Chinese billionaire Richard Li. A123 got $249.1 million from the Obama administration and more than $100 million in grants and tax credits from the state of Massachusetts. But troubles forced the company to file for bankruptcy in October 2012.”

Perhaps BHO should focus on the colors red, white, and blue for a change and leave GREEN to Mexico and other 3rd-world utopians?

And perhaps his majesty should trash his pen and cell phone foolishness, and instead install a Bankruptcy Prevention Czar?

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/18/blackburn-to-obama-stop-funding-green-firms-that-benefit-chinese-investors/#ixzz2tmlbf8jM


Happy President’s Day? Don’t Be Silly!

By John W. Lillpop

Commensurate with the events of January 20, 2009 when control and command over the greatest nation in human history was ceded to an inexperienced community organizer, congenital lair,  and staunch Marxist, whom was born God only knows where, President’s Day has been a farcical reminder of just how gullible the American people can be

The so-called “holiday” also serves as an annual affirmation of just how vulnerable our blessed Democracy is to manipulation by those who may not have the best interests of our nation at heart.

Indeed, Barack Obama exploited white liberal guilt, rampant African-American racism, $750 million dollars, a legion of ACORN volunteers expert in voter fraud, and a complicit media working at the behest of the Democrat Party to hijack the democratic process and the U.S. Presidency.

The results of the Obama conquest of American politics were predictable and have been realized: Diminished American influence and respect all across the globe; promulgation of unconstitutional mandates involving socialized medicine; soaring unemployment; out-of-control spending and devastating deficits; failure to address the nation’s energy needs, thereby making the nation more dependent on the middle east at a time when that region of the world is on the verge of political collapse and utter instability, and lack of trustworthiness and transparency, i.e., a mockery of the “Honest and Open Government” slogan promised by candidate Obama.

In other words, there is absolutely no reason to celebrate President’s Day given the failed poser now in power.

Happy Presidents Day? Don’t Be Silly!


Why Did Obama Refuse to Consider Delaying Obamacare Last Fall?

By John W. Lillpop

There he goes again!

After adamantly refusing to negotiate with Congressional Republicans seeking a delay of Obamacare mandates in order to avert a government shutdown last fall, Barack Obama has spent much of these last months delaying, modifying, and ignoring his very own ‘signature’ health care law.

While Obama would not budge at all when it came to considering GOP concerns, his resolve has been demolished by at- risk Democrats whose political prospects for the mid-term elections are turning to mush by the disastrous roll out and subsequent implementation of the unmitigated disaster known as the Affordable Care Act.

Rather than manning up to his failures and working with Congress to fix the Obamacare mess, Obama continues to apply tyranny to fix tyranny, as reported at the reference:

'ObamaCare" is useful shorthand for the Affordable Care Act not least because the law increasingly means whatever President Obama says it does on any given day. His latest lawless rewrite arrived on Monday as the White House decided to delay the law's employer mandate for another year and in some cases maybe forever.

ObamaCare requires businesses with 50 or more workers to offer health insurance to their workers or pay a penalty, but last summer the Treasury offered a year-long delay until 2015 despite having no statutory authorization. Like the individual mandate, the employer decree is central to ObamaCare's claim of universal coverage, but employers said the new labor costs—and the onerous reporting and tax-enforcement rules—would damage job creation and the economy.

Liberals insisted that such arguments were false if not beneath contempt, but then all of a sudden the White House implicitly endorsed the other side. Now the new delay arrives amid a furious debate about jobs after a damning Congressional Budget Office report last week, only this time with liberals celebrating ObamaCare's supposed benefits to the job market.
Well, which is it? Either ObamaCare is ushering in a worker's paradise, in which case by the White House's own logic exempting businesses from its ministrations is harming employees. Or else the mandate really is leading business to cut back on hiring, hours and shifting workers to part-time as the evidence in the real economy suggests.

Under the new Treasury rule, firms with 50 to 99 full-time workers are free from the mandate until 2016. And firms with 100 or more workers now also only need cover 70% of full-time workers in 2015 and 95% in 2016 and after, not the 100% specified in the law.

The new rule also relaxes the mandate for certain occupations and industries that were at particular risk for disruption, like volunteer firefighters, teachers, adjunct faculty members and seasonal employees. Oh, and the Treasury also notes that, "As these limited transition rules take effect, we will consider whether it is necessary to further extend any of them beyond 2015." So the law may be suspended indefinitely if the White House feels like it.

By now ObamaCare's proliferating delays, exemptions and administrative retrofits are too numerous to count, most of them of dubious legality. The text of the Affordable Care Act specifically says when the mandate must take effect—"after December 31, 2013"—and does not give the White House the authority to change the terms.

Changing an unambiguous statutory mandate requires the approval of Congress, but then this President has often decided the law is whatever he says it is. His Administration's cavalier notions about law enforcement are especially notable here for their bias for corporations over people. The White House has refused to suspend the individual insurance mandate, despite the harm caused to millions who are losing their previous coverage.

Liberals say the law isn't harming jobs or economic growth, but everything this White House does screams the opposite.”

The obvious conclusion from all of this is that Obama knew that Obamacare was an unmitigated disaster back in October, but chose to lure the GOP into the “shutdown trap," strictly
for political purposes.

Once again, the most vulnerable of the American people have been ‘gamed’ by a Marxist dictator who could care less about ‘little’ people!



Chuck Schumer’s Un-American Proposal For Dealing With Renegade President!

By John W. Lillpop

Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer apparently agrees with GOP House Speaker John Boehner that Barack Obama cannot be trusted to enforce the law!

As reported at the reference:

New York Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer had a rather novel “compromise” for Republicans claiming they won’t vote for immigration reform because they don’t trust President Obama to enforce it: “Enact the law this year, but simply not let it actually start until 2017 — AFTER President Obama’s term is over.”

Imagine that: A powerful member of the US Senate, and a liberal Democrat at that, advocating the promulgation of law so as to specifically avoid a far-left president who cannot be trusted to follow the US Constitution!

Good heavens, there must be a better, more American, way.

And this is it:

Rather than pandering to the contemptuous renegade currently occupying the White House, Congress should act to remove Obama from office NOW!  To hell with waiting until 2017!

Next, take immediate action to deport ALL ILLEGAL aliens now.

Then secure the borders!

Let’s return our nation to a first-world land where rule of law, rather than racial electoral politics, reigns supreme!

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/09/schumer-to-gop-implement-immigration-reform-law-after-obama-leaves-office-video/#ixzz2sw9aedih


Wise Doctor Summarizes Obamacare Disaster in One Sentence

By John W. Lillpop

A "must see," sad but true, video about the Obamacare scam:


Rand Paul’s Rails Against “Sexual Predators,” Especially a Former POTUS!

By John W. Lillpop

Democrat politicians who peddle the foolish notion of a GOP ‘war on women,’ need to be reminded, again, again, and again, of the real war against the weaker sex waged by Bill Clinton, former President of the US, and spouse of Hillary Rodham Clinton, whom, if she were elected President, would presumably drag the impeached Clinton back into the White House.

Is this really what America needs, after eight years of Marxist rule by a congenital liar and incompetent community organizer?

After years of abuse at the hands of a congenital lying community organizer and Marxist, why in the hell should America allow a sexual predator back into the White House, if only in the capacity as POTUS spouse?

Surely we can do better?

Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky thinks so, and is speaking out on the subject.

As reported at the reference:

Senator Rand Paul who has been in a bit of a tiff recently with the Clintons, says that any Democrat who has raised campaign money with former President Clinton should return the cash to protest his sexual behavior in the White House.

Speaking on C-SPAN’s “Newsmakers” program, in an interview airing Sunday, Mr. Paul said Democrats are being hypocritical by criticizing Republicans as waging a war on women while at the same time embracing Mr. Clinton, who was impeached for lying about a sexual relationship with a White House intern.

 “They can’t have it both ways. And so I really think that anybody who wants to take money from Bill Clinton or have a fundraiser has a lot of explaining to do. In fact, I think they should give the money back,” Mr. Paul, Kentucky Republican, said. “If they want to take position on women’s rights, by all means do. But you can’t do it and take it from a guy who was using his position of authority to take advantage of young women in the workplace.”

Mr. Paul recently called Mr. Clinton a “sexual predator” for his relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky.

The House voted to impeach Mr. Clinton in 1998, making him the second president in history to face such a dishonor. 

The Senate voted not to convict him.

Mr. Clinton remains popular with Democratic voters, and even attended a Senate Democratic retreat this week to talk policy and strategy. And he remains a popular fundraiser on the campaign trail.

Some Democrats have sprung to the Clintons’ defense, including Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri, who said it was “infuriating” for Mr. Paul to cite Mr. Clinton as a response to the GOP’s policies toward women. She also said it was unfair to tarnish Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is pondering whether to run for president in 2016, with the actions of her husband.

“I think most women understand that they should not be held accountable for the behaviors of their husbands. And you know, frankly, it was a long time ago, and our country did very well under the leadership of Bill Clinton,” Ms. McCaskill told MSNBC.

McCaskill, who is supporting Mrs. Clinton in 2016, didn’t always feel that way. In 2008, she supported then-Sen. Barack Obama over Mrs. Clinton a

nd commented that she wouldn’t want her daughter to be near Mr. Clinton.
Mr. Paul said Mr. Clinton’s settlement with Paula Jones in 1999, in which he paid $850,000 to settle Ms. Jones’ claims of sexual harassment, is an admission of guilt by the former president. He also said Mr. Clinton was “convicted” by the public for harassment with Ms. Lewinsky.”

Perhaps Senator McCaskill can answer a question:

Hillary Clinton “Stood by her man” at a time when Slick was using the power and prestige of his office to seduce helpless  women in the halls of the White House.

What does Hillary’s silence during Slick’s debauchery  say about her judgment and values?



Speaker Boehner(R-Oh) Finally “Evolves” on Amnesty!

By John W. Lillpop

A major reason for Republican opposition to immigration reform is the fact that Barack Obama has proven to be a congenital liar who generally regards the rule of law as his personal province, subject to unilateral change or abandonment, depending on his personal views.

Obama’s ‘Pen and Phone’ threats have heightened GOP concern that Obama would cherry-pick immigration reform provisions to increase Democrat party numbers, but would ignore or weaken border security and enforcement.

Obama’s disgusting performance in implementing Obamacare has made GOP concerns all the more valid when it comes to immigration reform.

Speaker John Boehner has frightened many conservatives with his mindless embrace of the amnesty nightmare. Until now.

As reported at the reference, Boehner seems to have evolved, albeit belatedly and unwillingly:

House Speaker John A. Boehner said Thursday that until President Obama proves he’s serious about enforcing immigration laws, it will be difficult to get a bill through the House this year — dealing a potentially fatal blow to the chances for action in 2014.

“Listen, there’s widespread doubt about whether this administration can be trusted to enforce our laws. And it’s going to be difficult to move any immigration legislation until that changes,” the Ohio Republican told reporters at his weekly press conference.
That came exactly a week after Mr. Boehner had appeared to jump-start the debate by releasing principles for an immigration deal that included granting most illegal immigrants legal status and giving younger illegal immigrants a specific pathway to citizenship.”

Boehner’s actions will surely add to Latino hostility toward GOP politicians since many Latinos were convinced that Boehner would deliver in 2014.

The argument that “…there’s widespread doubt about whether this administration can be trusted to enforce our laws,” is certainly valid, but why did the Speaker drink of Obama’s amnesty Kool-Aid to begin with?

Get with it, Mr. Speaker: Granting amnesty to invading criminals is a crazy idea that should be thrown out and NEVER revived!



How About a “Comprehensive” Plan to Deport Illegals?

By John W. Lillpop

For nigh unto 20 years, America has battled to get its hands around the invasion of our nation by illegal aliens, most of whom come here from south of our borders.

In 1994, California voters approved, by a 2-1 margin, Proposition 187 which would have denied services to illegals.  That proposition was  eventually scuttled by Governor Gray Davis who argued that the law was too “divisive.”

20 years later, the nation is overrun with non-English speaking foreigners who decided, unilaterally, to move to the US, notwithstanding our borders and laws.

The US Congress has entered the fray with several attempts at fixing the immigration mess, mostly by caving into illegals who demand everything, in exchange for diluting American culture and language with third-world habits and language.

Throughout the years, politicians have sought to pass laws that would allow government to make that which is illegal and immoral suddenly legal and the “right thing to do.”

Oddly enough, over the years no one has proposed that the government do its job be enforcing the rule of law, including the deportation of those who do not belong here.

And so the crisis grows and grows. It is now estimated that providing services and goods to illegals costs US taxpayers more than $110 billion each year!

110 billion a year to support people who have no legal or moral basis for being here!

Yes, deporting 11 million, or 30 million, invaders would be expensive. But we could save $110 billion a year, or more than a trillion dollars over 10 years, by deporting invaders.

Americans should take to the streets to demand that the idiotic plans to grant amnesty be scrapped.

In it’s place, lets implement comprehensive deportation plans, buttressed by secure borders.

That is the right thing to do!


Urgent Need for Immigration “Principles” that Put Americans First!

By John W. Lillpop

Republican leaders in the US House of Representatives have issued a list of ‘Immigration Principles’ to support their abdication to those who believe that America is no longer a sovereign entity worth defending.

Indeed, the so-called Principles appear to be an open invitation to millions more who would ignore our borders and laws, all at the expense of real Americans.

GOP leaders seem to be saying, "Come one, come all! Our borders and laws mean nothing to those who will work for nothing and vote Democrat!" 

Americans must reject, out of hand, John Boehner’s foolish attempt to sabotage America’s language, culture, and borders.

Instead, the US Congress and President need to regard immigration as an issue which must be addressed intelligently to restore adherence to the rule of law, with the interests of the American people first and foremost.

Policy based on growing the Democrat party or importing cheap labor should NOT be at the heart of America’s immigration plans.

Rather, immigration standards should reflect what is best for Americans and the nation as a whole.

The following principles should be signed into law:

*America is a sovereign nation, totally independent of foreign influence. It has been that way for well over 200 years. We intend to keep it that way.

* Demanding that our borders be secured and that the law be enforced is the right of all American citizens; doing so does not make any one a racist or bigot.

*U.S. immigration laws exist to protect American citizens & others here legally, not to facilitate a foreigner’s pursuit of a better life.

*America operates according to the rule of law which applies to everyone. This is true whether one is brown, black, yellow, lily-white or red.

*Being hard-working and good hearted is commendable. However,  qualities do NOT entitle anyone to enter America illegally.

*Celebrating one’s cultural heritage is perfectly fine--as long as it does not interfere with complete and prompt assimilation into American culture, including mastery of English .

* People here illegally are criminals, and as such, are  unwelcome. American citizens will fight to have such miscreants deported, regardless of whether or not families are involved. Illegal is illegal, Family or not.

*Those who come to America must adjust to our culture and traditions. We have no obligation or desire to change in deference to foreign newcomers.

The above principles should be pounded into the heads of John Boehner, Eric Cantor, Rand Paul, Paul Ryan, and all other RINOs who would give America away, for 30 pesos of silver, or less.

RINOs need to be reminded that they do not OWN this great nation, and, thus, it is not their to give away!

Real patriots will work diligently to defeat those who would voluntarily convert America into a third-world nation.

As for a path to citizenship, such a path already exists!

However, said path does not involve jumping a fence and running like hell to hide in the shadows. Rather, the real path involves standing in line and complying with the background, financial, criminal, medical and documentation  checks needed to protect the American people!

Again: Immigration policy should be based on rule of law, rather than racial and electoral politics and cheap labor!

John Kerry Cites Another Obama Failure: Syria

By John W. Lillpop

More incredible than the lopsided victory of the Seattle Seahawks over the Denver Broncos in Superbowl 48: Barack Obama trying to convince Bill O’Reilly that the president’s woes, among which are Obamacare, Benghazi, IRS targeting of conservative groups , NSA spying, Fast and Furious gun running,  and others, exist only because of extreme unbalanced, anti-Obama fervor at Fox News!

Talk about audacity!

Obama’s pathetic smoke screen had barely been broadcast when Secretary of State John Kerry added to Barack's misery by declaring that the Obama policy in Syria is a failure.

As reported at the reference:

It is no secret that the Obama administration’s Syria policy, to the extent that one exists, is failing.

Now the man with the unenviable task of implementing that policy, Secretary of State John F. Kerry, has acknowledged as much, according to two U.S. senators who spoke with him Sunday, John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.).

Kerry said that the Geneva negotiating process hasn’t delivered, they said, and that new approaches are needed.

“He acknowledged that the chemical weapons [removal] is being slow-rolled, the Russians continue to supply arms, [and] we are at a point now where we are going to have to change our strategy,” Graham said.”

Two possible explanations come to mind for Kerry's startling announcement:

1. Kerry is a closeted reporter working undercover for FOX news, 0r

2. Barack Obama's unbridled reluctance and inability to face reality renders The One on the verge of being unfit for office.

When last America faced a crisis of emotional and functional  stability in a president, Richard M. Nixon was in charge. Thankfully, several Republicans joined forces in the interest of the nation and convinced Nixon to go back to California, sans the presidency.

The big question: Are there any Democrats with the guts and patriotism to deal with Barack  Obama?



Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, & Nancy Pelosi: What Is It About California?

By John W. Lillpop

In the summer of 2013, Burt Prelutsky, columnist for the LA Times, wrote a column which offered a valuable analysis of California’s obsession with moon-bat, female politicians.

As reported at the reference, Prelutsky wrote:

“Frankly, I don’t know what it is about California , but we seem to have a strange urge to elect really obnoxious women to high office. I’m not bragging, you understand, but no other state, including Maine, even comes close. When it comes to sending left-wing dingbats to Washington, we’re number one. There’s no getting around the fact that the last time anyone saw the likes of Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, and Nancy Pelosi, they were stirring a cauldron when the curtain went up on ‘Macbeth’. The three of them are like jackasses who happen to possess the gift of blab. You don’t know if you should condemn them for their stupidity or simply marvel at their ability to form words.”

Well said, Burt!

Interestingly enough, all three of the ‘ladies’ cited are at least 70 years old, and each is clearly suffering from age-related hysteria.

By the way, please do not overlook the insanity and dysfunction of Rep. Maxine Waters, another 70-something wacko who should retire-- for the good of America!

Reference: http://republicmainstreet.wordpress.com/2010/04/02/burt-prelutsky-of-la-times-on-california-women-politicians/


US Congress Serious About Immigration Reform? If So, Implement Mexico's Law!

By John W. Lillpop

Nearly 30 years after the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 was signed into law by President Reagan, ostensibly to fix the illegal alien problem once and for all, America begins 2014 embroiled in yet another bitter, divisive, gut-wrenching  debate over the fate of tens of millions of illegals who reside here unlawfully.

These tens of millions of uninvited and unwelcome peoples have settled here despite IRCA and despite the terrorist attack of 9/11 which should have caused our leaders to forcibly close US borders to unlawful entry.

As US lawmakers struggle to find answers to this continuing problem, our leaders should look south to our troubled neighbors in Mexico, where some of the toughest, no-nonsense immigration laws in the world are on the books.

As reported at the reference, Mexico’s immigration laws, if enforced, could help solve America’s illegal alien problem, once and for all.


Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:

- Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
- Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)
- Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
- The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)

Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:

- Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
- A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
- A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:

- Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
- Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:

- Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
- Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
- Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico — such as working with out a permit — can also be imprisoned.

• Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,

- “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)
- Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
- Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security” will be deported. (Article 126)

• Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:

- A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
- Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)


Mexico’s Constitution
(English translation)

• The Mexican constitution expressly forbids non-citizens to participate in the country’s political life.
Non-citizens are forbidden to participate in demonstrations or express opinions in public about domestic politics. Article 9 states, “only citizens of the Republic may do so to take part in the political affairs of the country.” Article 33 is unambiguous: “Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country.”

• The Mexican constitution denies fundamental property rights to foreigners.
If foreigners wish to have certain property rights, they must renounce the protection of their own governments or risk confiscation. Foreigners are forbidden to own land in Mexico within 100 kilometers of land borders or within 50 kilometers of the coast.

Article 27 states, “Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization and Mexican companies have the right to acquire ownership of lands, waters, and their appurtenances, or to obtain concessions for the exploitation of mines or of waters. The State may grant the same right to foreigners, provided they agree before the Ministry of Foreign Relations to consider themselves as nationals in respect to such property, and bind themselves not to invoke the protection of their governments in matters relating thereto; under penalty, in case of noncompliance with this agreement, of forfeiture of the property acquired to the Nation. Under no circumstances may foreigners acquire direct ownership of lands or waters within a zone of one hundred kilometers along the frontiers and of fifty kilometers along the shores of the country.” (Emphasis added)

• The Mexican constitution denies equal employment rights to immigrants, even legal
ones, in the public sector.

“Mexicans shall have priority over foreigners under equality of circumstances for all classes of concessions and for all employment, positions, or commissions of the Government in which the status of citizenship is not indispensable. In time of peace no foreigner can serve in the Army nor in the police or public security forces.” (Article 32)

• The Mexican constitution guarantees that immigrants will never be treated as real Mexican citizens, even if they are legally naturalized.
Article 32 bans foreigners, immigrants, and even naturalized citizens of Mexico from serving as military officers, Mexican-flagged ship and airline crew, and chiefs of seaports and airports:

“In order to belong to the National Navy or the Air Force, and to discharge any office or commission, it is required to be a Mexican by birth. This same status is indispensable for captains, pilots, masters, engineers, mechanics, and in general, for all personnel of the crew of any vessel or airship protected by the Mexican merchant flag or insignia. It is also necessary to be Mexican by birth to discharge the position of captain of the port and all services of practique and airport commandant, as well as all functions of customs agent in the Republic.”

• An immigrant who becomes a naturalized Mexican citizen can be stripped of his Mexican citizenship if he lives again in the country of his origin for more than five years, under Article 37. Mexican-born citizens risk no such loss.

• Foreign-born, naturalized Mexican citizens may not become federal lawmakers (Article 55), cabinet secretaries (Article 91) or supreme court justices (Article 95).

• The president of Mexico must be a Mexican citizen by birth AND his parents must also be Mexican-born citizens (Article 82), thus giving secondary status to Mexican-born citizens born of immigrants.

• The Mexican constitution singles out “undesirable aliens.” Article 11 guarantees federal protection against “undesirable aliens resident in the country.”

• The Mexican constitution provides the right of private individuals to make citizen’s arrests.
Article 16 states, “in cases of flagrante delicto, any person may arrest the offender and his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities.” Therefore, the Mexican constitution appears to grant Mexican citizens the right to arrest illegal aliens and hand them over to police for prosecution.

• The Mexican constitution states that foreigners may be expelled for any reason and without due process.
According to Article 33, “the Federal Executive shall have the exclusive power to compel any foreigner whose remaining he may deem inexpedient to abandon the national territory immediately and without the necessity of previous legal action.”

Bottom Line: American citizens deserve to be protected from foreign invasions similar to the protections that Mexico uses to protect its citizens.

Our federal Government is responsible for defending US borders and sovereignty.

Rather than working to implement amnesty, the US Congress and President should concentrate on the needs of American citizens...and implement tough laws like that of Mexico!

* Reference: http://doctorjohnblog.com/2013/06/


Here’s Wishing Nancy Pelosi a Happy 74th, and a Restful Retirement!

By John W. Lillpop

On March 26, Nancy Pelosi, the person most responsible for San Francisco’s deserved reputation as a Mecca for progressive insanity, will turn 74 years old.

That’s right, Nancy Pelosi will have been on the planet for almost three quarters of a century!  The fact that the planet is still alive, if not doing so well, is a testament to the tenacity  of Mother Nature in combating idiocy!

After Pelosi’s wrecking ball career in the US House, especially her role in the corrupt takeover of the best health care system in the world and replacement thereof with the thievery popularly known as Obamacare, isn’t it time, Ms. Pelosi,  to put the wrecking ball out to pasture?

Just last week, Pelosi’s Comrade in Leftist Crime, Rep.Henry Waxman, announced that he is giving the American people, the Republic, and the entire concept of reasoned self-governance a break, by retiring from the US House!

Bravo, Comrade, Mr. Waxman! After 40 years of disservice, you finally got one right!

Now if we can just convince the embarrassing Pelosi to join Waxman in returning to the once Golden state of California to live out her remaining years as a permanent member of the detested “1 percent” crowd, America will benefit---except, that is, for those of us who still live in the dust and insanity of liberal politics gone batty!

Adios, Nancy, and thanks for exactly nothing!