While Big Easy Takes on Oil, Obama Sues Arizona!
By John W. Lillpop
President Barack Obama, fresh off his “kick ass” success in rescuing Afghanistan from the poor judgment of General Stanley McCrystal, decided to expand his newly-minted toughness to domestic affairs.
Unfortunately, the poor judgment that was supposed to exit with the deposed general has taken up residence in the president’s own immature mind.
As reported, in part, at reference 1, the Big Easy, still in recovery from W.’s Katrina, is now taking on oil from the Obama fiasco:
“NEW ORLEANS – Oil from the ruptured well in the Gulf of Mexico is seeping into Lake Pontchartrain north of New Orleans, threatening another environmental disaster for the huge body of water that was rescued from pollution in the 1990s.
It (Lake Pontchartrain) is threatened again after a weekend when tar balls and an oil sheen pushed by strong winds from faraway Hurricane Alex slipped past lines of barges that were supposed to block the passes connecting the Gulf of Mexico to the lake.”
Adding to the environmental misery, tar balls have made their way to Galveston Texas, the first evidence that oil has reached the Texas coastline.
While the worst environmental disaster in history spreads to Big Easy and all of the Gulf States, Barack Hussein Obama, in a snit of poor judgment and political fraud, has unleashed the vast powers and resources of the U.S. Government against the state of Arizona for its tough, and long overdue, anti-illegal alien bill.
Call Obama’s hideous meddling what you wish, pandering to illegal aliens, or trolling for votes among those who oppose secure borders and the rule of law, the fact is that Barack Obama has taken his eye off the tar balls long enough to attack a sovereign entity of the United States.
Which is either incredibly poor judgment, or out and out treason, or, most probably, both.
In attacking Arizona and the American citizens residing there, Obama and his Marxist menaces continue to push amnesty for invading criminals based on these outrageous lies:
Our Borders Are Secure: Liberals have concocted a foolish argument to counter the “secure the borders first” demands from people who really care about American sovereignty.
Namely, Obama and leftist moon bats like Pete Stark of California are fond of saying that the borders ARE secure!
This falsehood is incredibly shallow, given the fact that there are millions of Illegals here. If the borders are indeed secure, how in the hell did they get in?
And how is it that Arizona rancher Robert Krentz was murdered by Illegals from Mexico on his own property in March?
There Are Only 12 Million Illegals Here: Desperate moon bats even try to lie about the number of illegal aliens currently here. The number 12 million, in and of itself a scandal and outrage, is clearly understated by a factor of three or more.
In fact, there are probably closer to 40 million illegal aliens squatting in America right now.
Why in the world would any intelligent person with the slightest love for American values wish to grant citizenship to 40 million invading criminals, most of whom are uneducated, penniless, and non-English speaking?
Illegals Contribute to Our Economy and Society: Liberals, looking for newcomers who can be convinced to vote Democrat after being showered with benefits reserved for citizens, love to claim that illegal aliens are a net gain to the U.S. economy.
In truth, of course, illegal aliens cost U.S. taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars as year.
As reported, in part, at Reference 2:
“The cost of harboring illegal immigrants in the United States is a staggering $113 billion a year — an average of $1,117 for every “native-headed” household in America — according to a study conducted by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR).
“The study, a copy of which was provided to FoxNews.com, “is the first and most detailed look at the costs of illegal immigration ever done,” says Bob Dane, director of communications at FAIR, a conservative organization that seeks to end almost all immigration.
“FAIR’s report argues that there are two choices in the immigration debate: “One choice is pursuing a strategy that discourages future illegal migration and increasingly diminishes the current illegal alien population through denial of job opportunities and deportations. The other choice,” it says, “would repeat the unfortunate decision made in 1986 to adopt an amnesty that invited continued illegal migration.”
Again, why would any intelligent citizen with even a smidgen of love for America agree to amnesty for invading criminals who cost American taxpayers $113 billion a year?
The answer: U.S. policy is NOT in the hands of intelligent citizens who have even a smidgen of love for America.
Rather, we are governed by an administration of men and women of incredibly poor judgment who despise American language, culture, and values!
Reference 2: http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/070110FairExecutiveSummary.pdf
Posted by John W Lillpop at 9:00 AM