By John W. Lillpop
Thanks to social networking phenomenon such as Twitter and Facebook, as well as “old school” notions like cable television, hundreds of millions, perhaps billions, of people around the world are witnessing first-hand as the Land of Pharaohs is torched by tens of thousands of angry malcontents in Alexandria and Cairo.
On the heels of the revolution which drove Tunisia's aging, autocratic president, Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, from power two weeks ago, the crumbling of Egypt before our very eyes is a frightening wake-up call:
Events in the Middle East are officially out-of-control. America’s influence and interests in this vital part of the globe are laden with uncertainty and foreboding danger.
Unfortunately for the world, and particularly the United States, President Barack Obama is uniquely unqualified to intelligently analyze the extremely complex social, religious, economic, and political issues inflaming the Middle East.
Obama's allegedly brilliant mind has never been applied to any problem more substantial than community organizing and wealth distribution.
As a result, the American president is unable to develop a coherent, reasonable strategy.
Meanwhile, the world is looking desperately to America for leadership at this crucial moment. The “Most Powerful Man in the World,” is being counted to calm the frustrations that could very well lead to anarchy and all out revolution in the region.
Sadly, President Obama has exhibited nothing but queasiness and dithering in dealing with Iran, North Korea, Israel, the war on terror and other international issues, as well as a host of domestic issues.
Thus, the world and America must look elsewhere for leadership and confidence in dealing with major issues like the Egypt crisis.
Which prompts the question: Is the crisis in Egypt yet another example of an issue that is beyond the “Pay Grade” of President Obama?
29.1.11
Beware the Hazards of Clinical Liberalism
Satire by John W. Lillpop
Recognizing when one’s mind has been infested with clinical liberalism is vital information that one must be aware of order to survive in an ever-increasingly dangerous world where liberals are tolerated, even encouraged, in some quarters.
This simple, yet scientific, test has been programmed to evaluate “liberal quotient,” which is the exact opposite of intelligence quotient, and normally portends serious mental and moral defects.
The test:
1. Abortion
A. The privacy provision in the U.S. Constitution was authored by:
( ) Roe V. Wade, one of the original founding fathers
( ) Sandra Day O’Connor
( ) Paid lobbyists for Planned Parenthood and Code Pink
B. Abortions should be:
( ) Mandatory for all unmarried women.
( ) Included in universal health care coverage paid for by the government.
( ) Funded by eliminating the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy.
2. Global War on Terror
The war on terror is:
( ) A term that deeply offends Muslims and should, therefore, be expunged from all government communications.
( ) Lost: The terrorists have won and America should surrender immediately.
( ) Yet another failed policy of George W. Bush, which has been inherited.
3. Taxes
Higher taxes:
( ) Stimulate economic growth and create millions of secure, high paying jobs.
( ) Are needed to keep overachievers modestly modest
( ) Should be paid by any family with an annual income in excess of $7,450
4. Energy and Dependence on Foreign Oil
A. Drilling for new oil reserves in America is:
( ) Prohibited by the U.S. Constitution.
( ) Sure to irritate Muslim leaders whom Obama should be working with, rather than against.
( ) Unnecessary if automobiles are outlawed.
B. Additional refining capacity would:
( ) Increase demand, thereby causing more global warming.
( ) Be the moral equivalent of the Holocaust.
( ) Be OK in blue states if built by brown illegal aliens.
C. The best option for dealing with the high cost of gasoline is to:
( ) Ignore it. Americans drive too much as it is.
( ) Raise gasoline taxes $5.50 per gallon to reduce demand.
( ) Cut off supplies to Red states.
5. Illegal Immigration
A. Illegal immigration is:
( ) Needed by liberals in order to win elections.
( ) A misnomer. They are actually undocumented Democrats!
( ) Mexico’s chief export.
B. Border security should be:
( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce.
( ) Ignored, because we need cheap lettuce and more Democrats.
( ) Put on hold until the Obama Administration fixes Afghanistan.
C. The fence between the United States and Mexico is:
( ) Unconstitutional. It discriminates against Mexicans too fat to scale a fence.
( ) A good idea if it will stop the Minutemen from invading Mexico.
D. Obama’s proposed immigration reform scheme:
( ) Will work if guest workers are required to join a labor union.
( ) Sounds like amnesty, but Mexicans here illegally deserve amnesty!
E. Janet Napolitano, Home Land Security Boss and a Democrat
( ) Thinks ‘’Minutemen’’ is a reference to the sexual staying power of Border Patrol agents.
( ) Believes that the 12-40 million people who have ignored our borders and invaded America are “Newly Arrived Refugees” who deserve respect and a path to citizenship
6. Liberal Understanding of Islam
A. Ramadan:
( ) Is a scared Muslim ritual that has been commercialized into a national hotel chain—Ramada Inn—by greedy American capitalists.
( ) Is not covered by constitutional separation of church and
state, because the founding fathers were all Christian Caucasians.
B. The Koran:
( ) Should be required reading in U.S. schools starting in Kindergarten
( ) Was used in the second swearing-in procedure for Barack Obama to the presidency
( ) Is needed to counter Judeo-Christian propaganda found in the Bible.
C. Mosques:
( ) Are holy sanctuaries, except when used to plot nuclear attacks against Israel.
( ) Are never used to hide weapons, except during time of war. Because of infidels, Islam has always been, and will always be, at war.
D. The practice of rewarding martyrs with 72 virgins:
( ) Makes far more sense that the Christian myth about a virgin giving birth to a Jew come to save the world.
( ) Assures that Allah will always have a large contingent of dedicated, virile young men eager to give their very lives for the righteous cause of Islam.
Congratulations! You have successfully completed this objective assessment of your vulnerability as a practicing liberal.
Because we understand that self-esteem and confidence are very fragile commodities to liberals, we provide neither answers nor grades to this test. This is essential to protect those who may have performed poorly.
But rest assured that you did GREAT-- like everyone else, regardless of sex, nationality, race, language, sexual preference, age, blah, blah, blah!
27.1.11
Obama's Bay of Pigs
By John W. Lillpop
Several months after assuming power in 1961, President John F. Kennedy authorized the invasion of southwest Cuba by U.S. trained-immigrants exiled from Cuba. The idea was to overturn the communist dictatorship of Fidel Castro.
Ultimately, the operation was a miserable failure and was appropriately named the Bay of Pigs by proponents and opponents alike.
50 years later, America has a president who claims to be the heir apparent to the Kennedy legacy, including Camelot.
As such, Camelot Light, AKA, President Obama, has tried desperately to follow in the foot steps of JFK.
Unfortunately, Team Obama got its wires crossed. Instead of attacking Cuba, for example, Camelot Light attacked the U.S. military by ordering the watering hole for terrorists and terrorists in training at GITMO to be closed.
Not the same as JFK's focus, but it does involve Cuba!
Thanks to Camelot Light, anxious Americans should be able to sleep more securely knowing that terrorists will eventually be entitled to the same presumption of innocence conferred upon native born citizens, folks who rarely slice another person's throat from ear to ear because of religious preferences.
But President Obama's greatest Bay of Pigs moment, thus far, appears to be his collaboration with fellow liberals in the U.S. House and Senate on the outrageous stimulus farce, a $1 trillion dollar rip off..
As someone once famously said, "If it Looks Like a Pig, Squeals like a Pig, and Smells like a Pig, Then it probably IS a Pig!"
Democrats served up a real stinker of a pig, this one wallowing in red ink. No exceptions for those who observe Kosher or other dietary constraints.
Apparently, the idea was to bankrupt several future generations of Americans in one fell swoop, thereby installing socialism as the permanent replacement for free market capitalism.
It is all part of Obama's spread the weealth scheme.
Unfortunately, the stimulus package that Obama signed is spreading poverty from sea to shining sea.
Which is fine with Democrats, because impoverished people always vote Democratic. Why not increase the liberal base by doing what liberals do best: Spend foolishly and waste taxpayer money on failed liberal concepts?
After all, bleeding head liberals can always blame former President George W. Bush--for at least two more generations, or until the economy recovers.
26.1.11
Obama’s “Freeze” Ignores Cold, Harsh Reality
By John W. Lillpop
Given the state of America’s financial house, i.e.., soaring federal deficits, out-of-control spending, massive entitlements for which funding does not exist, and on and on, President Obama’s proposed spending “freeze” for five years is but a mockery at best, a vile disregard for reality at worse.
By the way, Barack Obama’s contract expires in 2012, and there is ample reason to believe that the American people will elect NOT to renew.
That being the case, why in the hell is Barack Obama proposing anything that fails to term out in November 2012?
More of that indefatigable arrogance and insolence, Mr. President?
But back to the proposed “freeze.”
An analogy to the brutal world of weight loss should provide a perfect example of why President Obama’s freeze idea is on very thin ice:
Take a 5’10” tall, 650-pound man, fifty years of age with Type 2 diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, and high cholesterol, who smokes two packs of unfiltered Camel cigarettes a day and whose only activity is coughing and wheezing.
That man’s dance with death is roughly equivalent to what Obama and his Marxist pals in Congress have done to America’s finances. Not a pretty sight!
That man, for whom the grim reaper is ready to stake an immediate claim, decides to CHANGE by reforming his ways.
Thus, he decides to “freeze” his caloric intake at 7,000 per day, about what it takes to sustain a 650-pound body. In addition, because exercise is so time-consuming and inconvenient, our subject decides to continue his exercise regime—which is 0 hours a day, 365 days a year.
Based on this “freeze” scenario, our friend will be dead, or damn close to it, in five years.
And so it is with President Obama’s hair-brained spending freeze. Should Republicans be foolish enough to let Obama get away with this scam, in five years America will be in, or on the edge of, financial insolvency.
Which will be a huge problem for President Romney, or President Palin, or whom ever the nation installs to replace Barack Obama in 2012.
An urgent appeal to the GOP is warranted: Do not be fooled by Obama’s snake oil. The man simply does not understand, or refuses to understand, the simple arithmetic of responsible budgeting. Never been there, never done that!
The watch word for the next two years must be CUT, CUT, and CUT some more to save America.
Remember, GOP, we are counting on you to return at least a semblance of financial sanity to our once great nation!
25.1.11
Senators Schumer and Coburn to Sit Together at SOU? This Must Not Happen!
By John W. Lillpop
In a mindless piece of political theater, several elected officials, bitter adversaries in real life, have agreed to sit together for the State of the Union to demonstrate a new era of civility and cooperation among Democrats and Republicans.
Bull feathers!
The idea is irrational, ungodly, abnormal, immoral, and very likely unconstitutional! The very notion that asses and elephants can co-exist in a political setting without rancor and vulgar demagoguery is an affront to the principles on which this nation was founded.
Democrats and Republicans are SUPPOSED to disagree on everything of importance. Any attempt to undercut that built-in hostility must be regarded as subversive to our democracy, and probably Communist in origin.
One of the most revolting examples of the nicey-nicey pandemic that threatens the very survival of our democracy is the announced accord between left-wing nut ball Charles Schumer, Democrat Senator from New York, and conservative icon Tom Coburn, the great Senator from Oklahoma!
God Bless Tom Coburn for his opposition to ObamaCare and outrageous deficit spending! This good man deserves a far better fate than sitting next to an obnoxious Marxist from New York.
In fact, rather than seating these two opposites together, why not have them duel it out—with real swords and gallantry!—for the right to sit in the front row.
Senator Schumer is a well-known coward so the match should go to the far more rational and disciplined Coburn.
Hooray!
The next most outrageous pairing involves Eric Cantor, GOP Representative and developing superstar from Virginia. It has been reported that Rep. Cantor has invited Rep. Nancy Pelosi, moon bat Democrat from San Francisco and deposed Speaker of the House, to his box for the Obama teleprompter reading.
Can you imagine anyone outside of Moscow actually volunteering to sit next to Pelosi? Egad, Eric, have you lost your bloody mind?
Because of the male -versus -female -inequity, an all out duel to the end between Cantor and Pelosi might be problematic. Any other procedure (kidnapping, etc.) that will keep Pelosi out of the building for the length of the SOU will do, thank you.
Nicey-nicey between Democrats and Republicans? The Founding Fathers would NOT be amused!
In a mindless piece of political theater, several elected officials, bitter adversaries in real life, have agreed to sit together for the State of the Union to demonstrate a new era of civility and cooperation among Democrats and Republicans.
Bull feathers!
The idea is irrational, ungodly, abnormal, immoral, and very likely unconstitutional! The very notion that asses and elephants can co-exist in a political setting without rancor and vulgar demagoguery is an affront to the principles on which this nation was founded.
Democrats and Republicans are SUPPOSED to disagree on everything of importance. Any attempt to undercut that built-in hostility must be regarded as subversive to our democracy, and probably Communist in origin.
One of the most revolting examples of the nicey-nicey pandemic that threatens the very survival of our democracy is the announced accord between left-wing nut ball Charles Schumer, Democrat Senator from New York, and conservative icon Tom Coburn, the great Senator from Oklahoma!
God Bless Tom Coburn for his opposition to ObamaCare and outrageous deficit spending! This good man deserves a far better fate than sitting next to an obnoxious Marxist from New York.
In fact, rather than seating these two opposites together, why not have them duel it out—with real swords and gallantry!—for the right to sit in the front row.
Senator Schumer is a well-known coward so the match should go to the far more rational and disciplined Coburn.
Hooray!
The next most outrageous pairing involves Eric Cantor, GOP Representative and developing superstar from Virginia. It has been reported that Rep. Cantor has invited Rep. Nancy Pelosi, moon bat Democrat from San Francisco and deposed Speaker of the House, to his box for the Obama teleprompter reading.
Can you imagine anyone outside of Moscow actually volunteering to sit next to Pelosi? Egad, Eric, have you lost your bloody mind?
Because of the male -versus -female -inequity, an all out duel to the end between Cantor and Pelosi might be problematic. Any other procedure (kidnapping, etc.) that will keep Pelosi out of the building for the length of the SOU will do, thank you.
Nicey-nicey between Democrats and Republicans? The Founding Fathers would NOT be amused!
24.1.11
Eligibility Nit-picking Trips-up Another Chicago Politician!
By John W. Lillpop
First it was Barack Hussein Obama who, according to some, failed the eligibility smell test because of some little known Constitutional requirement that the president must be a citizen.
Even the buffoonery of Neal Abercromie, Hawaii’s very hairy and confused Democrat governor,has not been enough to quell the birther movement, which, by the way, originated with Attorney Philip Berg on behalf of Hillary Clinton in 2008.
Now in a shocker nearly as calamitous to Chicago mobsters as the dive of Chicago Bears’ quarterback Jay Cutler at Soldier’s Field on Sunday, an Illinois court has shot down (oops! Excuse the hateful rhetoric!) the trumped- up candidacy of Rahm Emanuel.
As reported:
Just what is it about eligibility that confounds Chicago politicians so?
First it was Barack Hussein Obama who, according to some, failed the eligibility smell test because of some little known Constitutional requirement that the president must be a citizen.
Even the buffoonery of Neal Abercromie, Hawaii’s very hairy and confused Democrat governor,has not been enough to quell the birther movement, which, by the way, originated with Attorney Philip Berg on behalf of Hillary Clinton in 2008.
Now in a shocker nearly as calamitous to Chicago mobsters as the dive of Chicago Bears’ quarterback Jay Cutler at Soldier’s Field on Sunday, an Illinois court has shot down (oops! Excuse the hateful rhetoric!) the trumped- up candidacy of Rahm Emanuel.
As reported:
Rahm Emanuel should not appear on the Feb. 22 mayoral ballot because he does not meet the residency standard, according to a ruling issued by a state appellate court today.
In a 2-1 ruling, the appellate panel said Emanuel does not meet the residency requirement of having lived in Chicago for a year prior to the election. The judges reversed a decision by the Chicago Board of Election Commissioners, which had unanimously agreed that Emanuel was eligible to run for mayor.
Just what is it about eligibility that confounds Chicago politicians so?
Why Not Celebrate Life Before Birth?
By John W. Lillpop
When the U.S. Supreme Court sanctioned abortion on demand in 1973, the justices who approved became party to a human rights violation of monumental proportions.
50 million human lives have been exterminated through abortion in the United States since the court issued a death warrant for unborn lives.
That is nearly seven times the number of Jews who perished at the hands of Adolph Hitler, and more than the number of victims slaughtered by Joseph Stalin.
However, unlike those murdered by Hitler and Stalin, the 50 million fetuses killed in America had no political, social, or religious enemies. Rather, they were innocent human lives waiting to experience the blessings of birth and the joys of life.
Those who believe that abortion should be an inalienable right refuse to accept an indisputable fact: A fetus is human life before birth
That says it all. Call that fetus what you wish, the fact remains that it is human life. Albeit, the fetus is a life without power, voting rights, free speech or any other protection afforded the born. However, it is a human life, nevertheless.
In addition, human life, in all forms, is a precious gift from God regardless of how inconvenient the pregnancy may be.
Abortion, then, is a deliberate, premeditated destruction of one of God’s greatest blessings.
Abortion is a superseding of divine will by mortal will. Those who do so shall be held accountable at a final, and eternal, judgment.
Which is why, even in cases involving the most despicable subhuman killers, our society affords layer-upon-layer of legal review and appeal before using execution as the ultimate punishment.
Unfortunately, while some liberals fight to the bitter end to save the pathetic life of a thug convicted of multiple murders, there is no mercy or fight in them for the unborn--those with life before birth.
May good and righteousness ultimately prevail in the hearts of the American people, and replace a mindset that tolerates abortion on demand with one that celebrates “Life before Birth.”
When the U.S. Supreme Court sanctioned abortion on demand in 1973, the justices who approved became party to a human rights violation of monumental proportions.
50 million human lives have been exterminated through abortion in the United States since the court issued a death warrant for unborn lives.
That is nearly seven times the number of Jews who perished at the hands of Adolph Hitler, and more than the number of victims slaughtered by Joseph Stalin.
However, unlike those murdered by Hitler and Stalin, the 50 million fetuses killed in America had no political, social, or religious enemies. Rather, they were innocent human lives waiting to experience the blessings of birth and the joys of life.
Those who believe that abortion should be an inalienable right refuse to accept an indisputable fact: A fetus is human life before birth
That says it all. Call that fetus what you wish, the fact remains that it is human life. Albeit, the fetus is a life without power, voting rights, free speech or any other protection afforded the born. However, it is a human life, nevertheless.
In addition, human life, in all forms, is a precious gift from God regardless of how inconvenient the pregnancy may be.
Abortion, then, is a deliberate, premeditated destruction of one of God’s greatest blessings.
Abortion is a superseding of divine will by mortal will. Those who do so shall be held accountable at a final, and eternal, judgment.
Which is why, even in cases involving the most despicable subhuman killers, our society affords layer-upon-layer of legal review and appeal before using execution as the ultimate punishment.
Unfortunately, while some liberals fight to the bitter end to save the pathetic life of a thug convicted of multiple murders, there is no mercy or fight in them for the unborn--those with life before birth.
May good and righteousness ultimately prevail in the hearts of the American people, and replace a mindset that tolerates abortion on demand with one that celebrates “Life before Birth.”
The TRUE State of the Union?
By John W. Lillpop
Everyone knows what President Obama is going to say about the State of the Union on Tuesday night:
So, then, just what exactly is the true State of the Union?
From the perspective of a non-elitist, revolutionary citizen it is as follows:
America’s federal debt just passed $14 trillion due to reckless spending by Obama and his liberal cronies in Congress. The ceiling must not be increased--the time to act responsibly is now.
Our nation is a war with Islam, which our alleged Commander-in-Chief refuses to acknowledge as an enemy.
Unstable tyrants running North Korea and Iran have, or are very close to having, nuclear capabilities that could wipe out the human species for several millennium.
Civil unrest is brewing here at home as the lock box for securing Ponzi schemes has been repeatedly raided by liberals; thus, funds for Social Security, Medicare, and the like are running out.
On top of the horrendous shortfall in money needed to feed the entitlements monster created by progressives, a brand new Ponzi scheme—called ObamaCare—is about to go broke before it really takes off.
The border between Mexico and the U.S., the one that failed to keep 12-40 million invading criminals from coming to America, is more porous than the typical kitchen colander.
Janet Napolitano's declaration that the border has never been more secure is a perspective possible only in a deranged liberal mind that views 12-40 illegal aliens as Newly Arrived Refugees.
On and on it goes. Serious challenges that need immediate action NOW! Or sooner.
So with economic collapse, nuclear Armageddon, civil unrest, and other calamities facing the nation, what are the duly-elected in the U.S. Congress applying their energies and talents to?
Would you believe that the mindless rascals are wasting valuable time trying to work out an accommodation that will allow Democrats and Republicans to sit together, side by side, during the State of the Union speech that Barack Obama will read from a teleprompter?
Like who really gives a tinker’s dam? Folks, you are supposed to embroiled in bitter partisan debate, if not saber rattling.
Forget all the nicey-nicey BS and get a handle on spending. And do whatever it takes to stop further erosion of America into a third-world Marxist state at the hands of Barack Obama!
To hell with fretting about whether the president or his liberal cohorts like you or not!
Do what is best for America. PERIOD!
Finally if any sort of seating arrangements are to be implemented, the following suggestions are offered, free of charge:
Joe Wilson:
Please seat this South Carolina Republican on the podium right next to the president. Do this to assure that everyone in the building, and in the national TV audience, hears Wilson’s words clearly.
The Supreme Court:
Caution is in order after President Obama exploded and used the justices as punching bags during the 2009 SOU.
Best advice: Do NOT even invite the Supreme Court to the State of the Union. When the issue comes up after January 25, just say that there were not enough seats, or that the US Postal Service must have lost the dam invites.
Seating by Number of Ear Marks:
Under this scheme, the representatives and senators would be seated in ascending order according to the number and dollar value of ear marks processed by each Congress critter.
Seating by Number of Death Threats Received:
In honor of the victims of the January 8 Tucson horror, lets seat these Congressional bozos by the number of death threats received over the past 12 months. Not to include threats made by spouses, lovers, prostitutes, or serious significant others.
Seating by Number of Death Threats Issued:
As we have learned from exposing the unsteady mind of former Democrat Paul Kanjorski, there may be just as many death threats issued by Congressional members as received by these elitist buzzards.
Lets get a handle on this number and seat the critters accordingly.
This is but a partial list of endless possibilities, all of which are more creative and productive than seating these fools together!
Everyone knows what President Obama is going to say about the State of the Union on Tuesday night:
"At long last, America is emerging from eight years of abuse which was inherited by the current administration. At last, we are headed in the right direction.Everyone also knows that the president is following in the tradition of all previous presidents by exaggerating through his teeth about the State of the Union.
"We have provided a reasonable and effective health care program that will significantly reduce the deficit while covering 30 million previously uninsured Americans.
Millions of good jobs are ours for the taking, provided we spend just a few trillion more dollars to stimulate the sick economy that was inherited.
As a result of New Start, the world has never been safer.
Because of Janet Napolitano's dedicated work, the U.S.-Mexico border has never been more secure. So much so that border patrol agents in Arizona can be sent to Afghanistan to help those beleaguered folks keep thugs from Pakistan out.
In order to support the emerging economic boom, Congress must act quickly to increase the debt ceiling. Temporarily, of course.
Blah,blah, blah, blah."
So, then, just what exactly is the true State of the Union?
From the perspective of a non-elitist, revolutionary citizen it is as follows:
America’s federal debt just passed $14 trillion due to reckless spending by Obama and his liberal cronies in Congress. The ceiling must not be increased--the time to act responsibly is now.
Our nation is a war with Islam, which our alleged Commander-in-Chief refuses to acknowledge as an enemy.
Unstable tyrants running North Korea and Iran have, or are very close to having, nuclear capabilities that could wipe out the human species for several millennium.
Civil unrest is brewing here at home as the lock box for securing Ponzi schemes has been repeatedly raided by liberals; thus, funds for Social Security, Medicare, and the like are running out.
On top of the horrendous shortfall in money needed to feed the entitlements monster created by progressives, a brand new Ponzi scheme—called ObamaCare—is about to go broke before it really takes off.
The border between Mexico and the U.S., the one that failed to keep 12-40 million invading criminals from coming to America, is more porous than the typical kitchen colander.
Janet Napolitano's declaration that the border has never been more secure is a perspective possible only in a deranged liberal mind that views 12-40 illegal aliens as Newly Arrived Refugees.
On and on it goes. Serious challenges that need immediate action NOW! Or sooner.
So with economic collapse, nuclear Armageddon, civil unrest, and other calamities facing the nation, what are the duly-elected in the U.S. Congress applying their energies and talents to?
Would you believe that the mindless rascals are wasting valuable time trying to work out an accommodation that will allow Democrats and Republicans to sit together, side by side, during the State of the Union speech that Barack Obama will read from a teleprompter?
Like who really gives a tinker’s dam? Folks, you are supposed to embroiled in bitter partisan debate, if not saber rattling.
Forget all the nicey-nicey BS and get a handle on spending. And do whatever it takes to stop further erosion of America into a third-world Marxist state at the hands of Barack Obama!
To hell with fretting about whether the president or his liberal cohorts like you or not!
Do what is best for America. PERIOD!
Finally if any sort of seating arrangements are to be implemented, the following suggestions are offered, free of charge:
Joe Wilson:
Please seat this South Carolina Republican on the podium right next to the president. Do this to assure that everyone in the building, and in the national TV audience, hears Wilson’s words clearly.
The Supreme Court:
Caution is in order after President Obama exploded and used the justices as punching bags during the 2009 SOU.
Best advice: Do NOT even invite the Supreme Court to the State of the Union. When the issue comes up after January 25, just say that there were not enough seats, or that the US Postal Service must have lost the dam invites.
Seating by Number of Ear Marks:
Under this scheme, the representatives and senators would be seated in ascending order according to the number and dollar value of ear marks processed by each Congress critter.
Seating by Number of Death Threats Received:
In honor of the victims of the January 8 Tucson horror, lets seat these Congressional bozos by the number of death threats received over the past 12 months. Not to include threats made by spouses, lovers, prostitutes, or serious significant others.
Seating by Number of Death Threats Issued:
As we have learned from exposing the unsteady mind of former Democrat Paul Kanjorski, there may be just as many death threats issued by Congressional members as received by these elitist buzzards.
Lets get a handle on this number and seat the critters accordingly.
This is but a partial list of endless possibilities, all of which are more creative and productive than seating these fools together!
21.1.11
3-2-1-0! Olbermann Out!
By John W. Lillpop
In what can only be described as a huge victory for civil discourse and intelligence in broadcasting, Keith Olbermann has hosted his last Countdown at MSNBC.
Although it has not been disclosed if Olbermann’s departure was his choice, that of the network, or a combination thereof, let’s not quibble about details!
The fact is that this petty, hateful, and unhinged sports jock is no longer posing as a pundit on serious news which means he is longer polluting the air waves at MSNBC, and that is a good thing!
Farewell Keith Olbermann, the Worst Person in the world for at least the past five years!
In what can only be described as a huge victory for civil discourse and intelligence in broadcasting, Keith Olbermann has hosted his last Countdown at MSNBC.
Although it has not been disclosed if Olbermann’s departure was his choice, that of the network, or a combination thereof, let’s not quibble about details!
The fact is that this petty, hateful, and unhinged sports jock is no longer posing as a pundit on serious news which means he is longer polluting the air waves at MSNBC, and that is a good thing!
Farewell Keith Olbermann, the Worst Person in the world for at least the past five years!
20.1.11
Should “Crosshairs” Be Added to FCC List of Banned Words?
By John W. Lillpop
In the aftermath of the tragic massacre of innocent people in Tucson, some liberal pundits have gone absolutely goofy about the word, “Crosshairs.”
For the record, according to the dictionary, crosshairs is defined as follows:
Hmmm.
Not a word there about Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, or Glenn Beck, or any other right wing nut pushing for the slaughter of liberals, or anyone else for that matter.
Even though use of the term by conservatives has NEVER included an express or implied call for violence, a leftist journalist with CNN felt it necessary to apologize for the use of crosshairs by a guest.
The on-air statement by CNN's John King:
Perhaps cross hairs should be added to the FCC list of seven dirty words?
In the aftermath of the tragic massacre of innocent people in Tucson, some liberal pundits have gone absolutely goofy about the word, “Crosshairs.”
For the record, according to the dictionary, crosshairs is defined as follows:
“Fine wires or fibers, strands of spider web, or the like, crossing in a focal plane of an optical instrument to center a target or object or to define a line of sight, and
“Marks for aiding in the positioning of overlaying images for correct registration in printing.”
Hmmm.
Not a word there about Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, or Glenn Beck, or any other right wing nut pushing for the slaughter of liberals, or anyone else for that matter.
Even though use of the term by conservatives has NEVER included an express or implied call for violence, a leftist journalist with CNN felt it necessary to apologize for the use of crosshairs by a guest.
The on-air statement by CNN's John King:
"Before we go to break, I want to make a quick point. We were having a discussion about the Chicago mayoral race. My friend Andy Shaw used the term 'in the crosshairs' in talking about the candidates. We're trying, we're trying to get away from that language. Andy is a good friend, he's covered politics for a long time, but we're trying to get away from that kind ofThat kind of language, John?
language."
Perhaps cross hairs should be added to the FCC list of seven dirty words?
Mexico: A Foreign Enemy to U.S.
By John W. Lillpop
To: President Obama and Open Borders Members of the U.S. Congress
Each of you has taken an oath to uphold the Constitution, and to defend America against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Your authority to govern We the People is contingent on fulfilling that solemn oath.
You serve at the will of We the People; you have no other claim to power.
The American people intend to hold each of you responsible for meeting the conditions of your oath of office.
Mexico is obviously a foreign nation, and is also a third-world, socialist nation, which because of corruption, greed, and incompetence, is unable to feed, educate, and provide minimal health care to its citizens.
Rather than reforming the political and economic policies that make Mexico a failure, the elitist socialists that govern Mexico have decided to "redistribute" America's wealth to 12-40 million peasants who have invaded America across the border.
Mexico's outrageous disregard for American borders and immigration law clearly makes that nation a "foreign enemy."
The unlawful invasion by Mexican citizens, encouraged by the Mexican government, results in great harm to America's homeland security, economic and cultural stability, and the rule of law.
Again: Mexico is an ENEMY OF THE UNITED STATES.
Immediate action must be taken to protect the American people from the undeclared war being waged against our interests by Mexico.
The single greatest priority in defending America is to secure the borders. If that means positioning 100,000 or so troops at the border, then so be it.
America must defend its borders against foreign invasion, including use of force if necessary.
Some recent immigration reform in congress entertain the notion of "amnesty," called guest worker in Washington.
All such proposals are unacceptable because they would simply encourage even more illegal aliens to invade America.
We must not reward criminal behavior with foolish amnesty programs!
If illegal aliens are uncomfortable about living in the shadows as second-class citizens,THAT IS NOT THE CONCERN OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!
Illegals are here illegally, and should not be made to feel good about themselves---they are criminals!
Illegal aliens have the option---make that obligation--- to go back to Mexico.
Bottom line: Secure our borders NOW, deport those here illegally NOW, and enforce all immigration laws NOW.
Please do not underestimate public passion on this issue!
.
19.1.11
Better off Now Than You Were Two Years Ago?
By John W. Lillpop
Nearly two years ago, at just after noon (EST) on January 20, 2009, Barack Hussein Obama was sworn in as the 44th president of the United States of America.
It was a day of orgiastic delight for the leftist media in America and cause for jubilation and much celebration throughout the world, particularly among European socialists and Communist dictators like Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez.
Expectations were that the newly-crowned president-deity would usher in an era of unprecedented prosperity, peace, rights and respect for women and racial minorities, free health care for all, and government controls to force the rich and powerful to “share the wealth” with the unwashed masses.
This was a social, economic and political revolution wrapped in one toxic ball of Marxism, with a dash of leftist spirituality thrown in to give the illusion of civility.
According to the left, Barack Obama was an surreal morphing of Robin Hood, Martin Luther King, Ronald Reagan, Superman, Gandhi, Franklin Roosevelt, and Bill Clinton without the sexual atrocities.
Unfortunately, the left failed to mention that the Obama template also included pieces of Karl Marx, Bill Ayers, Islam’s Mohamed and other wretched characters not held in high esteem by most Americans.
This new, bright-eyed and full of urine President was to CHANGE everything for the benefit of all.
Two years and a few trillion dollars later, the truth is finally settling in on the Obama fantasy.
The truth can be known by answering one simple question:
Are You Better off Now Than You Were Two Years Ago?
The answer for most Americans Is No! Hell No!
18.1.11
Seating Ideas for the State of the Union
Satire by John W. Lillpop
Just what exactly is the State of the Union?
A brief summary from the perspective of an informed and objective citizen follows:
America’s federal debt just passed $14 trillion.
Our nation is a war with Islam, which our alleged Commander-in-Chief refuses to acknowledge as an enemy.
The nation is also at war in Afghanistan, a war that President Obama sees as an opportunity to pick up votes in 2012 by surrendering in 2011, rather than as a grave threat to America’s future.
Unstable tyrants running North Korea and Iran have, or are very close to having, nuclear capabilities that could wipe out the human species for several millennium.
Civil unrest is brewing here at home as the liberal lock box for Ponzi schemes runs out of funds for Social Security, Medicare, and the like.
On top of the horrendous shortfall in money needed to feed the entitlements monster created by progressives, a brand new Ponzi—called ObamaCare—is about to go broke before it really takes off.
The border between Mexico and the U.S., the one that failed to keep 12-40 million invading criminals from coming to America, is more porous than the typical colander used to cull water from spaghetti.
DHS boss Janet Napolitano insists that the border has never been more secure, a perspective possible only in a deranged liberal mind that views 12-40 illegal aliens as Newly Arrived Refugees.
President Obama could care less about the dire circumstances that will ensue if the drug cartels of Mexico decide to annex Texas and points further north into their drug kingdoms. In his way of thinking, that could improve his chances of winning in 2012.
On and on it goes. Serious challenges that need immediate action NOW! Or sooner.
So with economic collapse, nuclear Armageddon, civil unrest, and other calamities facing the nation, what are the duly-elected in the U.S. Congress applying their energies and talents to?
Would you believe that the mindless rascals are wasting valuable time trying to work out an accommodation that will allow Democrats and Republicans to sit together, side by side, during the State of the Union speech that Barack Obama will read from a teleprompter on January 25?
Like who gives a tinker’s dam? Folks, you are supposed to embroiled in bitter partisan debate, if not saber rattling.
Forget all the nicey-nicey BS and get a handle on spending. And do whatever it takes to stop another further erosion of America into a Marxist state at the hands of Barack Obama!
To hell with fretting about whether the president or his leftist goons like you or not!
Do what is best for America. PERIOD!
Finally if any sort of seating arrangements should be implemented, the following suggestions are offered, free of charge:
Joe Wilson:
Please seat this South Carolina Republican from South Carolina on the podium right next to the president. Do this to assure that everyone in the building, and in the national TV audience, hears Wilson’s words clearly.
The Supreme Court:
Caution is imperative after President Obama exploded and used the justices as punching bags during the 2009 SOU.
Best advice: Do NOT even invite the Supreme Court to the State of the Union. When the issue comes up after January 25, just say that there were not enough seats, or that the US Postal Service must have lost the dam invites.
Seating by Number of Ear Marks:
Under this scheme, the representatives and senators would be seated in ascending order according to the number and dollar value of ear marks processed by each Congress critter.
Seating by Number of Death Threats Received:
In honor of the victims of the January 8 Tucson horror, lets seat these Congressional bozos by the number of death threats received over the past 12 months. Not to include threats made by spouses, lovers, prostitutes, or serious significant others.
Seating by Number of Death Threats Issued:
As we have learned from exposing the unsteady mind of former Democrat Paul Kanjorski, there may be just as many death threats issued by Congressional members as received by these elitist buzzards.
Lets get a handle on this number and seat the critters accordingly.
In summary, this is but a partial list of endless possibilities, all of which are more creative and productive than seating these fools together!
Just what exactly is the State of the Union?
A brief summary from the perspective of an informed and objective citizen follows:
America’s federal debt just passed $14 trillion.
Our nation is a war with Islam, which our alleged Commander-in-Chief refuses to acknowledge as an enemy.
The nation is also at war in Afghanistan, a war that President Obama sees as an opportunity to pick up votes in 2012 by surrendering in 2011, rather than as a grave threat to America’s future.
Unstable tyrants running North Korea and Iran have, or are very close to having, nuclear capabilities that could wipe out the human species for several millennium.
Civil unrest is brewing here at home as the liberal lock box for Ponzi schemes runs out of funds for Social Security, Medicare, and the like.
On top of the horrendous shortfall in money needed to feed the entitlements monster created by progressives, a brand new Ponzi—called ObamaCare—is about to go broke before it really takes off.
The border between Mexico and the U.S., the one that failed to keep 12-40 million invading criminals from coming to America, is more porous than the typical colander used to cull water from spaghetti.
DHS boss Janet Napolitano insists that the border has never been more secure, a perspective possible only in a deranged liberal mind that views 12-40 illegal aliens as Newly Arrived Refugees.
President Obama could care less about the dire circumstances that will ensue if the drug cartels of Mexico decide to annex Texas and points further north into their drug kingdoms. In his way of thinking, that could improve his chances of winning in 2012.
On and on it goes. Serious challenges that need immediate action NOW! Or sooner.
So with economic collapse, nuclear Armageddon, civil unrest, and other calamities facing the nation, what are the duly-elected in the U.S. Congress applying their energies and talents to?
Would you believe that the mindless rascals are wasting valuable time trying to work out an accommodation that will allow Democrats and Republicans to sit together, side by side, during the State of the Union speech that Barack Obama will read from a teleprompter on January 25?
Like who gives a tinker’s dam? Folks, you are supposed to embroiled in bitter partisan debate, if not saber rattling.
Forget all the nicey-nicey BS and get a handle on spending. And do whatever it takes to stop another further erosion of America into a Marxist state at the hands of Barack Obama!
To hell with fretting about whether the president or his leftist goons like you or not!
Do what is best for America. PERIOD!
Finally if any sort of seating arrangements should be implemented, the following suggestions are offered, free of charge:
Joe Wilson:
Please seat this South Carolina Republican from South Carolina on the podium right next to the president. Do this to assure that everyone in the building, and in the national TV audience, hears Wilson’s words clearly.
The Supreme Court:
Caution is imperative after President Obama exploded and used the justices as punching bags during the 2009 SOU.
Best advice: Do NOT even invite the Supreme Court to the State of the Union. When the issue comes up after January 25, just say that there were not enough seats, or that the US Postal Service must have lost the dam invites.
Seating by Number of Ear Marks:
Under this scheme, the representatives and senators would be seated in ascending order according to the number and dollar value of ear marks processed by each Congress critter.
Seating by Number of Death Threats Received:
In honor of the victims of the January 8 Tucson horror, lets seat these Congressional bozos by the number of death threats received over the past 12 months. Not to include threats made by spouses, lovers, prostitutes, or serious significant others.
Seating by Number of Death Threats Issued:
As we have learned from exposing the unsteady mind of former Democrat Paul Kanjorski, there may be just as many death threats issued by Congressional members as received by these elitist buzzards.
Lets get a handle on this number and seat the critters accordingly.
In summary, this is but a partial list of endless possibilities, all of which are more creative and productive than seating these fools together!
17.1.11
The Kennedy Clan: Pockets Deep Enough to Quash Inconvenient History
By John W. Lillpop
Like all good American families, the surviving members of the Kennedy clan have a healthy respect for history and the open and honest re-telling of such.
Except, that is, when it comes to the sordid affairs and corrupt lives of family members such as John, Robert, and Teddy Kennedy and other miscreants.
As reported at the reference, in part, one of the prerogatives of being rich and powerful is the ability to quash historical presentations that inch too close to truth:
Still, the American people have been blessed by the fact that, for the first time in decades, the halls of Congress are not cluttered with even one sex-crazed, alcohol, drug and power addicted, lady-killing Kennedy. Which means there are no Kennedy family members in Congress, thank God!
Lady killing, you ask? Does the term Chappaquiddick ring a bell?
The good news is that the series may be released by an interest other than the History network.
Perhaps that man with an unquenchable thirst for truth will step forward and sponsor the inconvenient truth of lives misspent?
Is Oliver Stone listening?
Reference http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2011/01/07/history-channel-nixes-conservative-producers-kennedy-miniseries-complaints/?test=faces
Like all good American families, the surviving members of the Kennedy clan have a healthy respect for history and the open and honest re-telling of such.
Except, that is, when it comes to the sordid affairs and corrupt lives of family members such as John, Robert, and Teddy Kennedy and other miscreants.
As reported at the reference, in part, one of the prerogatives of being rich and powerful is the ability to quash historical presentations that inch too close to truth:
“PASADENA, Calif. -- The History Channel will not air a controversial miniseries it produced about the Kennedy family, saying the multimillion project that had become the most expensive on record did not fit the "History brand."Bloody shame, that.
The eight-part series had already been completed, and starred Greg Kinnear and Katie Holmes as President John F. Kennedy and his wife, Jackie. But during its production, critics like former Kennedy administration aide Theodore Sorenson attacked the scripts as inaccurate. The role of producer Joel Surnow, also drew suspicion from fans of the Kennedy family.”
Still, the American people have been blessed by the fact that, for the first time in decades, the halls of Congress are not cluttered with even one sex-crazed, alcohol, drug and power addicted, lady-killing Kennedy. Which means there are no Kennedy family members in Congress, thank God!
Lady killing, you ask? Does the term Chappaquiddick ring a bell?
The good news is that the series may be released by an interest other than the History network.
Perhaps that man with an unquenchable thirst for truth will step forward and sponsor the inconvenient truth of lives misspent?
Is Oliver Stone listening?
Reference http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2011/01/07/history-channel-nixes-conservative-producers-kennedy-miniseries-complaints/?test=faces
16.1.11
Liberal Extremist Arrested for Threatening Tea Party Spokesman
By John W. Lillpop
In an exceptionally odd twist to the Tucson tragedy, one of the victims of Jared Loughner’s psychotic meltdown has himself been arrested for violent rhetoric.
As reported throughout the media, James Eric Fuller, 63, was arrested and taken for a psychiatric exam after an outburst at an event taped for a special edition of ABC's "This Week."
Fuller reportedly took a picture of Tea Party spokesman Trent Humphries and yelled “You're a dead man!”
Oh, and lest Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Ed Schultz or any of their ilk jump to the conclusion that Fuller was following instructions from El Rushbo, Sarah Palin, or Glenn Beck, the following blurb from The Politico is must reading:
The big question: Is James Eric Fuller bidding for a gig with MSNBC?
In an exceptionally odd twist to the Tucson tragedy, one of the victims of Jared Loughner’s psychotic meltdown has himself been arrested for violent rhetoric.
As reported throughout the media, James Eric Fuller, 63, was arrested and taken for a psychiatric exam after an outburst at an event taped for a special edition of ABC's "This Week."
Fuller reportedly took a picture of Tea Party spokesman Trent Humphries and yelled “You're a dead man!”
Oh, and lest Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Ed Schultz or any of their ilk jump to the conclusion that Fuller was following instructions from El Rushbo, Sarah Palin, or Glenn Beck, the following blurb from The Politico is must reading:
A wounded survivor of the Tucson shooting that critically injured Rep. Gabrielle Giffords is blaming Sarah Palin, House Speaker John Boehner, Fox TV host Glenn Beck, and former Nevada GOP Senate candidate Sharron Angle for the tragedy.
“It looks like Palin, Beck, Sharron Angle and the rest got their first target,” Eric Fuller said in an interview with Democracy NOW.
“Their wish for Second Amendment activism has been fulfilled — senseless hatred leading to murder, lunatic fringe anarchism, subscribed to by John Boehner, mainstream rebels with vengeance for all, even 9-year-old girls,” he added, referring to the death of Christina Taylor Green."
The big question: Is James Eric Fuller bidding for a gig with MSNBC?
15.1.11
Big Sis Hijacks Virtual Border Fence
Satire by John W. Lillpop
In all of her infinite wisdom and concern for the American people, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has unilaterally decided that the nation does not need the “Virtual Fence” to detect illegal aliens crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.
In a major Victory announcement released to the media today, Big Sis officially scrapped a Bush-era program designed to use radar technology to detect illegal immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.
Said she, "There is no 'one-size-fits-all' solution to meet our border technology needs, and this new strategy is tailored to the unique needs of each border region."
What the addled Napolitano really meant to say was this:
God Bless Newly Arrived Refugees!
Janet Napolitano
Working 24/7 to Make America Safe for Illegals
In all of her infinite wisdom and concern for the American people, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has unilaterally decided that the nation does not need the “Virtual Fence” to detect illegal aliens crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.
In a major Victory announcement released to the media today, Big Sis officially scrapped a Bush-era program designed to use radar technology to detect illegal immigrants crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.
Said she, "There is no 'one-size-fits-all' solution to meet our border technology needs, and this new strategy is tailored to the unique needs of each border region."
What the addled Napolitano really meant to say was this:
“With the 2012 elections just weeks away from being on a critical time path, and with Barack’s approval ratings on a trajectory that will make W.’s lowest numbers look awesomely good by comparison, we have concluded that immediate action must be taken to ease the path for millions of “Newly Arrived Refugees” from Mexico and points south.
“As the great Nancy Pelosi once pointed out, it is un-American to prevent even one Latino from entering the United States over concerns for silly documentation and other procedures that unnecessarily stifle the flow of good-hearted, hard working illegals to America.
“Importing a few million Spanish-speaking illegals and getting them registered as Democrats and appropriately goosed up to vote a straight Democrat ticket, is a formidable task, especially given the urgency.
“This challenge is akin to the efforts that we undertook in 2008 what with the ACORN voter fraud efforts and the voter intimidation success enjoyed by the New Black Panther Party in Phiiie.”
“However, because so many racist honkies have fled from The One since 2008, we must redouble our efforts to make the Obama Brand stick for another four years.
“The only way we can save America is by tearing down that dreadful fence in order to welcome any and all Latinos who can say Gracias in Spanish.
“To that end, I have ordered an immediate halt to border fence construction and have further ordered that all materials purchased for that ghastly project to date be used to build a standard 4-bedoom, 2.5 bath, 2000 square foot ranch home with attached garage for each Mexican family that can prove that there in America unlawfully, AND that they have registered with the Democrat Party.”
“This order is final and not subject to appeal, in accordance with applicable statutes that govern the protection and defense of the American people during time of war.”
God Bless Newly Arrived Refugees!
Janet Napolitano
Working 24/7 to Make America Safe for Illegals
14.1.11
Democrat Who Called for Shooting of Governor Now Says "Only Fruitcakes” Take Him Literally!
By John W. Lillpop
There is a perfectly good reason why Paul Kanjorski was booted out of Congress by Pennsylvania voters in November.
Actually, there are two: Stupidity and insolence.
Following the Tucson slaughter of a week ago, the deposed Democrat decided that the American people would benefit from his words of wisdom on the subject of violence.
Lunatics at the New York Times agreed and thus did they publish a New York Times op-ed in which Kanjorski engages in sanctimonious lecturing by writing:
“It is incumbent on all Americans to create an atmosphere of civility and respect in which political discourse can flow freely, without fear of violent confrontation."
Powerful words those, intended to inspire politicians to tone down the angry rhetoric and rise to a better place.
Hmmm.
Kanjorski’s lofty words in January, 2011 might be more believable and inspirational if the hypocritical Representative had not scraped bottom with these words of violence aimed at Republican Rick Scott last October.
Hmmm2. Sure sounds like a hypocritical contradiction, and another perfect example of the sort of stupidity that has Nancy Pelosi in a snit after being deposed as Speaker.
What say ye about that, Mr. Kanjorski?
This is where the insolence takes over.
Challenged to explain his own violence-laced rhetoric, Kanjorski brilliantly offered that "only fruitcakes" would take his statement about Scott literally.
So, when a Congressional Democrat proposes to stand a Republican against a wall and shoot him, those who are offended and outraged are “fruitcakes” ?
Whereas folks like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin and anyone with an R next to his or her name is guilty of conspiracy to commit murder for the crime of disagreeing with the Marxist agenda of Barack Obama and fellow Marxists?
Thank God Pennsylvania voters saw through this dim-witted vermin who, when you think about it, is the only true “Fruit cake” running around!
There is a perfectly good reason why Paul Kanjorski was booted out of Congress by Pennsylvania voters in November.
Actually, there are two: Stupidity and insolence.
Following the Tucson slaughter of a week ago, the deposed Democrat decided that the American people would benefit from his words of wisdom on the subject of violence.
Lunatics at the New York Times agreed and thus did they publish a New York Times op-ed in which Kanjorski engages in sanctimonious lecturing by writing:
“It is incumbent on all Americans to create an atmosphere of civility and respect in which political discourse can flow freely, without fear of violent confrontation."
Powerful words those, intended to inspire politicians to tone down the angry rhetoric and rise to a better place.
Hmmm.
Kanjorski’s lofty words in January, 2011 might be more believable and inspirational if the hypocritical Representative had not scraped bottom with these words of violence aimed at Republican Rick Scott last October.
"That Scott down there that's running for governor of Florida," Mr. Kanjorski said. "Instead of running for governor of Florida, they ought to have him and shoot him. Put him against the wall and shoot him. He stole billions of dollars from the United States government and he's running for governor of Florida. He's a millionaire and a billionaire. He's no hero. He's a damn crook. It's just we don't prosecute big crooks."
Hmmm2. Sure sounds like a hypocritical contradiction, and another perfect example of the sort of stupidity that has Nancy Pelosi in a snit after being deposed as Speaker.
What say ye about that, Mr. Kanjorski?
This is where the insolence takes over.
Challenged to explain his own violence-laced rhetoric, Kanjorski brilliantly offered that "only fruitcakes" would take his statement about Scott literally.
So, when a Congressional Democrat proposes to stand a Republican against a wall and shoot him, those who are offended and outraged are “fruitcakes” ?
Whereas folks like Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck, Sarah Palin and anyone with an R next to his or her name is guilty of conspiracy to commit murder for the crime of disagreeing with the Marxist agenda of Barack Obama and fellow Marxists?
Thank God Pennsylvania voters saw through this dim-witted vermin who, when you think about it, is the only true “Fruit cake” running around!
Obama Thanks Sheriff Dupnik: Really? For What?
By John W. Lillpop
Speculation that President Obama has forsaken his partisan extremism in favor of a kinder, gentler Marxist was shattered to smithereens this week when The One went out of his way to confer a completely undeserved presidential thank you on Sheriff Clarence Dupnik.
Dupnik is the left-wing wild man who poses as sheriff of Pima County, but who actually works for the DNC and other unsavory, anti-American insurgency groups in the Grand Canyon state.
As widely reported throughout the media, Obama spoke with Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik on the phone, and thanked the sheriff.
Pray tell, for what, Mr. President?
For violating the independence and objectivity that those in law enforcement are sworn to uphold?
Or was Obama thanking Dupnik for lambasting the president’s nemesis, El Rushbo?
If so, that is a bloody shame. After all, one had hoped that Obama had made progress in recovering from Lambaughphobia, that vexing neurosis that afflicts extreme liberals.
Or perhaps The One was thanking the clueless sheriff for opposing Arizona’s SB 1070, even refusing to enforce it?
Whatever caused Obama to thank the renegade Dupnik, the unjustified thank you is just the latest in a sequence of goofy acts that have Obama’s approval ratings mired in the 40s and declining!
Speculation that President Obama has forsaken his partisan extremism in favor of a kinder, gentler Marxist was shattered to smithereens this week when The One went out of his way to confer a completely undeserved presidential thank you on Sheriff Clarence Dupnik.
Dupnik is the left-wing wild man who poses as sheriff of Pima County, but who actually works for the DNC and other unsavory, anti-American insurgency groups in the Grand Canyon state.
As widely reported throughout the media, Obama spoke with Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik on the phone, and thanked the sheriff.
Pray tell, for what, Mr. President?
For violating the independence and objectivity that those in law enforcement are sworn to uphold?
Or was Obama thanking Dupnik for lambasting the president’s nemesis, El Rushbo?
If so, that is a bloody shame. After all, one had hoped that Obama had made progress in recovering from Lambaughphobia, that vexing neurosis that afflicts extreme liberals.
Or perhaps The One was thanking the clueless sheriff for opposing Arizona’s SB 1070, even refusing to enforce it?
Whatever caused Obama to thank the renegade Dupnik, the unjustified thank you is just the latest in a sequence of goofy acts that have Obama’s approval ratings mired in the 40s and declining!
Whither Barbara Boxer's Outrage Over Gasoline Prices?
By John W. Lillpop
Has anyone noticed that gasoline prices have exploded and regular unleaded is now over $3.00 a gallon?.
Oil is nearing $100 a barrel, so $4 dollar a gallon is inevitable!
So where in Hades is Barbara Boxer? Why is she not raising bloody hell and demanding an investigation into this gouging of the American people?
Back in 2004, Mrs. Boxer saw fight to assail big oil, President George W. Bush, and all Republicans because unleaded gasoline was priced at $2.11 a gallon.
$2.11 a gallon? According to this arrogant lefty, that was the work of evil capitalists.
As reported, in part, at http://boxer.senate.gov/gas/index.cfm:
"Thursday, March 11, 2004
"Washington, D.C.- U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today met with Federal Trade Commission Chairman Timothy Muris to discuss the sharp rise in gasoline prices in California.
"On February 24, 2004, Boxer sent a letter to Chairman Muris asking him to investigate the rise in gasoline prices for possible market manipulation. At that time, California gasoline prices had increased 16.1 cents in a week, compared to 4 cents nationally.
"As of Wednesday, March 10, the average price of a gallon of unleaded gasoline in California is $2.11 per gallon, compared to $1.82 a month ago.
"The following are excerpts of Senator Boxer's remarks following her meeting:
"The FTC agrees that there is an anomaly in California prices. In English, that means that the prices are going up faster than the factors that FTC uses to predict normal prices would indicate.
They (FTC) have started an informal investigation, which pleases me very much. Why have they done this? Because so far they cannot explain this phenomenon.
Right now they are in the early stages of this informal investigation, and I am today urging people in California to please contact us, or contact the FTC, or contact California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, and please let us know if there is any reason to believe that refineries are being taken off line unnecessarily, or there is collusion going on in any way.
"Of course I want a full blown investigation, I want a formal investigation- but I'm here to say that the FTC is in the process of an informal investigation, and to me there is a lot of hope that they have found this to be an anomaly."
So where is Senator Boxer now that gas is over $3 a gallon and headed to $4 a gallon under Barack Obama?
When you begin your investigation, Senator, please note the photograph of President Obama bowing to the King of Saudi Arabia.
Not sure if the photo it is relevant, but we are counting on you to investigate this outrageous gouging of We little people, even if your investigation leads to the Oval Office!
13.1.11
Who’s Afraid of Sarah Palin?
By John W. Lillpop
It is a given that everyone in the mainstream media, as well as all Democrats, stand in dread fear of the Governor from Alaska, AKA, Sarah Palin, the most beautiful and intelligent woman ever in American politics. EVER!
A curious oddity is that Palin’s most vocal detractors are the same people who claim that the Governor is saddled with a dismal IQ, somewhere between that of a bucket of mud and W.!
Which prompts the question: If Palin is so intellectually inferior, why are you leftist moon bats so befuddled by the Governor?
Indeed, why not stand down and let the Governor rise to the top where she can be pummeled like a helpless child by the omnipotent Barack Obama, the smartest person in the room--but only when he is by himself?
The insanity of the left as regards Governor Palin and her link(?) to the Tucson slaughter dropped to depths unimaginable for what is alleged to be a civilized, educated society.
Even the Governor’s statement, a reasoned and calm presentation which countered scurrilous attacks from the left, was attacked by dodos like Chris Matthews because Palin described her treatment by the Marxist media as “Blood libel.”
Six people in Tucson are dead and others including Gabby Giffords are fighting for survival and moon bats are hemorrhaging over use of the phrase “Blood Libel” ?
What the hell is happening to our nation? Is there no there here anymore?
By the way, for folks like Chris Matthews who ridiculed the Governor for using the term, a “teaching moment” appears to be urgently needed.
Specifically, as reported at reference 1, in part:
For the benefit of those who avoid the truth (hello Chris Matthews), Alan Dershowitz is anything but a “right wing” extremist.
So again, the pressing question is “Who’s afraid of Sarah Palin?”
The answer: Everyone, including Barack Obama, on the left!
However, to Palin supporters I say: Fret not. That lady can take care of herself!
Ref 1: http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/01/12/exclusive-alan-dershowitz-defends-sarah-palins-use-of-term-blood-libel/
It is a given that everyone in the mainstream media, as well as all Democrats, stand in dread fear of the Governor from Alaska, AKA, Sarah Palin, the most beautiful and intelligent woman ever in American politics. EVER!
A curious oddity is that Palin’s most vocal detractors are the same people who claim that the Governor is saddled with a dismal IQ, somewhere between that of a bucket of mud and W.!
Which prompts the question: If Palin is so intellectually inferior, why are you leftist moon bats so befuddled by the Governor?
Indeed, why not stand down and let the Governor rise to the top where she can be pummeled like a helpless child by the omnipotent Barack Obama, the smartest person in the room--but only when he is by himself?
The insanity of the left as regards Governor Palin and her link(?) to the Tucson slaughter dropped to depths unimaginable for what is alleged to be a civilized, educated society.
Even the Governor’s statement, a reasoned and calm presentation which countered scurrilous attacks from the left, was attacked by dodos like Chris Matthews because Palin described her treatment by the Marxist media as “Blood libel.”
Six people in Tucson are dead and others including Gabby Giffords are fighting for survival and moon bats are hemorrhaging over use of the phrase “Blood Libel” ?
What the hell is happening to our nation? Is there no there here anymore?
By the way, for folks like Chris Matthews who ridiculed the Governor for using the term, a “teaching moment” appears to be urgently needed.
Specifically, as reported at reference 1, in part:
“Famed attorney and Harvard Law Professor Alan Dershowitz defended Sarah Palin’s use of the term “blood libel” from multiple detractors. As the Media Matters/MSM/Democrat narrative on the Tucson tragedy unravels, they are getting a lot more desperate in their attacks on Palin. Fortunately, there are still plenty of honest liberals around:
“The term “blood libel” has taken on a broad metaphorical meaning in public discourse. Although its historical origins were in theologically based false accusations against the Jews and the Jewish People,its current usage is far broader. I myself have used it to describe false accusations against the State of Israel by the Goldstone Report. There is nothing improper and certainly nothing anti-Semitic in Sarah Palin using the term to characterize what she reasonably believes are false accusations that her words or images may have caused a mentally disturbed individual to kill and maim. The fact that two of the victims are Jewish is utterly irrelevant to the propriety of using this widely used term.”
For the benefit of those who avoid the truth (hello Chris Matthews), Alan Dershowitz is anything but a “right wing” extremist.
So again, the pressing question is “Who’s afraid of Sarah Palin?”
The answer: Everyone, including Barack Obama, on the left!
However, to Palin supporters I say: Fret not. That lady can take care of herself!
Ref 1: http://biggovernment.com/publius/2011/01/12/exclusive-alan-dershowitz-defends-sarah-palins-use-of-term-blood-libel/
12.1.11
Thinking Like a Liberal: Tucson Was Conspiracy to Block Repeal of ObamaCare!
By John W. Lillpop
Keeping up with the sharp, rapid decline in cognitive facilities among leftists in the media and Congress is a formidable challenge, not for those with queasy stomachs.
In fact, if one were to think like a liberal ever so briefly, one could imagine that the awful events of Saturday morning were a deliberate, well-orchestrated effort on the part of liberals to shut down the Republican repeal of ObamaCare in the U.S. House.
After all, Speaker John Bohener has been quite forthright in announcing the schedule for the repeal vote, which was scheduled for January 14.
Perhaps we need a new law to block public disclosure about pending votes in Congress, so as to keep crazy leftists like Jared Loughner from staging killing sprees?
Sadly, even Republican Peter King has jumped on the “think like a liberal” nut train by proposing that it be a crime to be armed within a thousand feet of any government officials.
Hmmm.
Does anyone really believe that such a law have stopped the crazed Loughner from trying to kill Rep. Giffords?
By the way, murder and attempted murder are both against the law, even in Arizona, right?
Perhaps Loughner was just too tripped out on weed to remember the consequences that one will most likely face for shooting 12 people, including government official Rep. Giffords?
Of course Loughner has had a lot on his diseased brain lately.
Which may help to explain why, if Sarah Palin was indeed the culprit behind Loughner’s insanity, he waited until AFTER Giffords was reelected to act.
After all, a good soldier in the Palin Reload Army would surely have understood that the Palin mission was all about PREVENTING Giffords from being reelected!
Perhaps the next time a leftist retard in search of fame crawls out from under his Marijuana-infested rock long enough to make a difference, he will be inspired by the likes of Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann and other alleged “journalists” who have put Sarah Palin in the cross- hairs since Saturday.
Maybe Schultz, Matthews, and Olbermann will inspire the next Jared Loughner to go directly after Sarah Palin?
Which leads to the big question: Would the assassination of Sarah Palin satisfy the liberal lust for conservative blood?
Keeping up with the sharp, rapid decline in cognitive facilities among leftists in the media and Congress is a formidable challenge, not for those with queasy stomachs.
In fact, if one were to think like a liberal ever so briefly, one could imagine that the awful events of Saturday morning were a deliberate, well-orchestrated effort on the part of liberals to shut down the Republican repeal of ObamaCare in the U.S. House.
After all, Speaker John Bohener has been quite forthright in announcing the schedule for the repeal vote, which was scheduled for January 14.
Perhaps we need a new law to block public disclosure about pending votes in Congress, so as to keep crazy leftists like Jared Loughner from staging killing sprees?
Sadly, even Republican Peter King has jumped on the “think like a liberal” nut train by proposing that it be a crime to be armed within a thousand feet of any government officials.
Hmmm.
Does anyone really believe that such a law have stopped the crazed Loughner from trying to kill Rep. Giffords?
By the way, murder and attempted murder are both against the law, even in Arizona, right?
Perhaps Loughner was just too tripped out on weed to remember the consequences that one will most likely face for shooting 12 people, including government official Rep. Giffords?
Of course Loughner has had a lot on his diseased brain lately.
Which may help to explain why, if Sarah Palin was indeed the culprit behind Loughner’s insanity, he waited until AFTER Giffords was reelected to act.
After all, a good soldier in the Palin Reload Army would surely have understood that the Palin mission was all about PREVENTING Giffords from being reelected!
Perhaps the next time a leftist retard in search of fame crawls out from under his Marijuana-infested rock long enough to make a difference, he will be inspired by the likes of Ed Schultz, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann and other alleged “journalists” who have put Sarah Palin in the cross- hairs since Saturday.
Maybe Schultz, Matthews, and Olbermann will inspire the next Jared Loughner to go directly after Sarah Palin?
Which leads to the big question: Would the assassination of Sarah Palin satisfy the liberal lust for conservative blood?
11.1.11
Who Asked Sheriff Dupnik His “Opinion” about the Tucson Massacre?
Who In the Hell Asked Sheriff Clarence Dupnik His “Opinion” about Tucson Massacre?
By John W. Lillpop
It used to be that law enforcement officials, the good ones anyway, were all about “Just the facts, madam” as with Joe Friday, the iconic police model from the Dragnet television series.
The idea was that personal opinions and feelings served no legitimate purpose while the facts were still being investigated. It was argued that detachment was essential to assuring the credibility of law enforcement.
That was then.
Now, with the American people still reeling from the bloody shootings in Tucson, and before proper respects could be paid to families and friends of the victims of six dead and many other seriously injured people, Sheriff Clarence Dupnik decided to inject his “opinion” into the BREAKING NEWS of the morning.
In so doing, Sheriff Dupnik exposed his own political bias and raised a genuine concern about his fitness to serve in a role that involves so much reliance on objectivity and trust.
As reported throughout the media, the very liberal sheriff allowed the following drivel to flow from his mouth:
With all due respect, Sheriff, attacking Rush Limbaugh and his ilk without having a shred of proof to substantiate the charges, and to do so in a manner that creates the impression that Limbaugh is actually a factor in the insanity of Jared Lee Loughner, is “irresponsible vitriol,” in and of itself, besides being incredibly stupid.
Rush Limbaugh is paid, quite handsomely, for giving his opinions.
Tens of millions of Americans voluntarily listen to Limbaugh every day for news and opinion that is not contaminated by the leftist main stream media, which serves as little more than a mouth piece for your Democrat Party. Sir!
You, on the other hand, are paid to protect the citizenry of Pima County. Perhaps events like the Tucson massacre could be handled better if YOU did your damn job instead of concerning yourself with what Rush Limbaugh is saying?
In all frankness, sheriff, no one, except those on the lunatic left anxious to pin the inanity of Loughner on the right , gives a tinker’s dam about your “opinions” about anything.
However, everyone expects you to be focused on preventing criminal behavior, and when it does occur, to apprehend the suspects, based on “facts” not opinion.
We understand that enforcing the law is low priority for you, as with your publicly announced opposition to SB 1050 and your insular refusal to enforce said measure.
THAT position is incredibly irresponsible--especially for any law enforcement official!
Why not leave the opining to the professionals, sheriff?
In other words, shut up and do your job!
By John W. Lillpop
It used to be that law enforcement officials, the good ones anyway, were all about “Just the facts, madam” as with Joe Friday, the iconic police model from the Dragnet television series.
The idea was that personal opinions and feelings served no legitimate purpose while the facts were still being investigated. It was argued that detachment was essential to assuring the credibility of law enforcement.
That was then.
Now, with the American people still reeling from the bloody shootings in Tucson, and before proper respects could be paid to families and friends of the victims of six dead and many other seriously injured people, Sheriff Clarence Dupnik decided to inject his “opinion” into the BREAKING NEWS of the morning.
In so doing, Sheriff Dupnik exposed his own political bias and raised a genuine concern about his fitness to serve in a role that involves so much reliance on objectivity and trust.
As reported throughout the media, the very liberal sheriff allowed the following drivel to flow from his mouth:
"The kind of rhetoric that flows from people like Rush Limbaugh, in my judgment he is irresponsible, uses partial information, sometimes wrong information," Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said today. "[Limbaugh] attacks people, angers them against government, angers them against elected officials and that kind of behavior in my opinion is not without consequences."
With all due respect, Sheriff, attacking Rush Limbaugh and his ilk without having a shred of proof to substantiate the charges, and to do so in a manner that creates the impression that Limbaugh is actually a factor in the insanity of Jared Lee Loughner, is “irresponsible vitriol,” in and of itself, besides being incredibly stupid.
Rush Limbaugh is paid, quite handsomely, for giving his opinions.
Tens of millions of Americans voluntarily listen to Limbaugh every day for news and opinion that is not contaminated by the leftist main stream media, which serves as little more than a mouth piece for your Democrat Party. Sir!
You, on the other hand, are paid to protect the citizenry of Pima County. Perhaps events like the Tucson massacre could be handled better if YOU did your damn job instead of concerning yourself with what Rush Limbaugh is saying?
In all frankness, sheriff, no one, except those on the lunatic left anxious to pin the inanity of Loughner on the right , gives a tinker’s dam about your “opinions” about anything.
However, everyone expects you to be focused on preventing criminal behavior, and when it does occur, to apprehend the suspects, based on “facts” not opinion.
We understand that enforcing the law is low priority for you, as with your publicly announced opposition to SB 1050 and your insular refusal to enforce said measure.
THAT position is incredibly irresponsible--especially for any law enforcement official!
Why not leave the opining to the professionals, sheriff?
In other words, shut up and do your job!
10.1.11
Guns Don’t Kill People: Left-wing Pot Heads Do!
Guns Don’t Kill People: Left-wing Pot Heads Do!
By John W. Lillpop
Despite the anxious yearning of the Left for a solid, irrefutable link between Jared Loughner and the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, or Sean Hannity, the simple truth is otherwise.
As of now, there is NO known link to the right whatsoever. This mentally deranged fool acted on his own, without inspiration from any higher power, save a possible intervention from Satan.
In fact, associates describe the despicable Loughner as a left-leaning drug addict.
All of which births a new truth for the ages: Guns do not kill people, left-wing pot heads do!
By John W. Lillpop
Despite the anxious yearning of the Left for a solid, irrefutable link between Jared Loughner and the Tea Party, Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, or Sean Hannity, the simple truth is otherwise.
As of now, there is NO known link to the right whatsoever. This mentally deranged fool acted on his own, without inspiration from any higher power, save a possible intervention from Satan.
In fact, associates describe the despicable Loughner as a left-leaning drug addict.
All of which births a new truth for the ages: Guns do not kill people, left-wing pot heads do!
Left Uses Tucson Massacre As Excuse to "Gun" for Sarah Palin
By John W. Lillpop
The slaughter and injury of innocent people by the mentally diseased Jared Loughner in Tucson has led to the inevitable trashing of right-wing broadcasters and politicians by liberal extremists still smarting from the November 2 “shellacking” administered by the American people.
Unable to accept the universal rejection of Marxism and big government excess by the electorate, the Left has deliberately used the deaths of six innocent people and serious injury to several others, including Rep. Giffords, to blame “right wing extremists” for the brutal acts of a very sick and disaffected 22-year-old malcontent.
Obvious chortling and gloating are a disgraceful reminder of the fact that many on the Left are more concerned with ripping the Tea Party, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck than in mourning for the dead and injured.
Most distressing is the treatment of Sarah Palin by moon bats whose visceral hatred apparently knows no bounds.
Sarah Palin is enemy # 1 to the Left because she is beautiful, intelligent, and a conservative, American patriot.
She is pro-family and pro-America, against higher taxes and big government, and embraces traditional family values.
Most of all, the Left hates Sarah Palin because she is a legitimate threat to the continued political career of our Marxist president.
The extent to which the Left’s hatred for Palin exists has been made clear as moon bates have actually made the contemptible charge that Palin is responsible for the carnage in Arizona on Saturday morning.
Citing her “targeting” of Democrats for defeat in the 2010 elections as proof of a violence-based agenda, ding bats on the Left appear determined to see that Sarah Palin pays for her conservative philosophy.
Indeed, the hateful, but childish, rhetoric against this patriotic conservative has the potential to drive some unhinged nut ball over the edge and into a “revenge” act to atone for Palin’s alleged part in the Jared Loughner killing spree.
Of course, the fact is that Sarah Palin has never remotely suggested that violence should be used against any political opponent, a truth that applies equally to Messrs. Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck.
That is in sharp conflict to wing nuts on the Left who have advocated the shooting of George W. Bush (R. Rhodes), and others who shouted “F” the president whilst engaged in the business of the Democratic caucus in the U.S. House.
WARNING: The extreme rhetoric now flooding the air waves from the Left pose a real and present danger to Sarah Palin.
Those on the Left need to step back and shut up, lest Ms. Palin be targeted for assassination.
The slaughter and injury of innocent people by the mentally diseased Jared Loughner in Tucson has led to the inevitable trashing of right-wing broadcasters and politicians by liberal extremists still smarting from the November 2 “shellacking” administered by the American people.
Unable to accept the universal rejection of Marxism and big government excess by the electorate, the Left has deliberately used the deaths of six innocent people and serious injury to several others, including Rep. Giffords, to blame “right wing extremists” for the brutal acts of a very sick and disaffected 22-year-old malcontent.
Obvious chortling and gloating are a disgraceful reminder of the fact that many on the Left are more concerned with ripping the Tea Party, Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck than in mourning for the dead and injured.
Most distressing is the treatment of Sarah Palin by moon bats whose visceral hatred apparently knows no bounds.
Sarah Palin is enemy # 1 to the Left because she is beautiful, intelligent, and a conservative, American patriot.
She is pro-family and pro-America, against higher taxes and big government, and embraces traditional family values.
Most of all, the Left hates Sarah Palin because she is a legitimate threat to the continued political career of our Marxist president.
The extent to which the Left’s hatred for Palin exists has been made clear as moon bates have actually made the contemptible charge that Palin is responsible for the carnage in Arizona on Saturday morning.
Citing her “targeting” of Democrats for defeat in the 2010 elections as proof of a violence-based agenda, ding bats on the Left appear determined to see that Sarah Palin pays for her conservative philosophy.
Indeed, the hateful, but childish, rhetoric against this patriotic conservative has the potential to drive some unhinged nut ball over the edge and into a “revenge” act to atone for Palin’s alleged part in the Jared Loughner killing spree.
Of course, the fact is that Sarah Palin has never remotely suggested that violence should be used against any political opponent, a truth that applies equally to Messrs. Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck.
That is in sharp conflict to wing nuts on the Left who have advocated the shooting of George W. Bush (R. Rhodes), and others who shouted “F” the president whilst engaged in the business of the Democratic caucus in the U.S. House.
WARNING: The extreme rhetoric now flooding the air waves from the Left pose a real and present danger to Sarah Palin.
Those on the Left need to step back and shut up, lest Ms. Palin be targeted for assassination.
9.1.11
Jared Loughner: Driven to Kill by Right-Wing Extremists?
By John W. Lillpop
A sick, despicable coward named Jared Loughner turned an ordinary shopping center in Tucson, Arizona into a killing field on Saturday morning. This deranged monster murdered six innocent people in cold blood, including a nine-year-old girl, and inflicted severe injuries on several others, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.
Unfortunately, the tragedy and sorrow of this awful day were magnified when, in some quarters, the events in Tucson were blamed on “right-wing” extremists.
The implication was that hard-edged rhetoric broadcast by Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck had somehow driven the 22-year-old Loughner into the abyss of insanity and murder.
Unbelievably, some even tried to blame the carnage directly on Sarah Palin.
As one who has listened to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck for years and years, I admit that I have never—never!—heard any of these conservative superstars even come close to suggesting that any form of violence should be used to advance conservative principles.
For sure, Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck routinely express very strong opinions about the massive intrusion of government into the lives of the American people, spending by Congress which has exploded the federal deficit, and the socialist change advocated by Barack Obama.
Strong opinions and a call for resistance, yes. But violence of any sort? Never!
However, the Tucson slaughter has led many to call for an easing of the harsh rhetoric and hate speech.
I agree.
In fact, the following examples of outrageous rhetoric should serve as warnings to all:
Left Wing Host Jokes About Shooting George W. Bush
While Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck have never joked about killing Barack Obama, left-wing radio talk show hostess Randi Rhodes once suggested that President George W. Bush should be shot.
As reported in the media, Rhodes said the following:
"The (leader) is the president of the United States, so why doesn't his father or his brother … take him out for a little fishing, and let him say some Hail Marys – he loves God so much. … You know, Hail Mary, full of grace, God is with thee – pow [gunshot sound] – works for me."
Now THAT is reckless and irresponsible!
Congressional Democrats Say “F” the President
President Obama’s “deal” with Republicans to extend the Bush tax cuts to all, including the well-to- do, spawned extreme rage from those on the far-left of the Democrat party.
This leftist rage was reported in the media where congressional reporter Carl Hulse revealed that “Vulgar words were aimed at President Obama” during a closed-door meeting of Democratic House members, a fact initially reported by Roll Call.
To be precise, the words were “F*** the President.”
That sort of language directed at a sitting president could cause a barely- sane person to take insane action, and is otherwise the sort of rhetoric that should be avoided, especially by members of the president’s own party.
Bringing Guns to Knife Fights
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Candidate Barack Obama himself resorted to extreme rhetoric on occasion, including this quote:
“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said in Philadelphia last night. “Because from what I understand, folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”
Surely a brilliant orator like Barack Obama could conjure up a less violent way to motivate his base?
This is even more dangerous rhetoric that should be avoided.
Republicans and Hand to Hand Combat
Barack Obama’s use of violent language did not end with his inauguration to the U.S. presidency.
In fact, on October 7 of 2010, President Obama said the following:
“A Republican majority in Congress would mean “hand-to-hand combat” on Capitol Hill for the next two years, threatening policies Democrats have enacted to stabilize the economy, President Obama warned Wednesday.”
Hand to hand combat? Is that sort of war-like language really necessary, Mr. President?
Is there not a danger that some unhinged soul might see your words as a declaration of war against fellow Americans who just happen to be Republicans?
Jesse Jackson: Cutting Obama’s Nuts Off
As reported in the media, the Reverend Jesse Jackson chose to use very graphic and violent language during the 2008 campaign to describe his disaffection with candidate Barack Obama.
“Jackson was caught on tape during a Fox News interview saying that he believed Obama was “talking down to black people,” remarking on recent speeches the Illinois senator made about fathers taking care of their children.
“I want to cut his nuts off,” Jackson later remarked.
Even though Reverend Jackson is of the same race and political ideology as Barack Obama, that sort of language is unacceptable for broadcast into homes where young, impressionable and unstable minds tune in.
It is also quite Un-Christian, Reverend!
In sum, the notion that vulgar, demeaning rhetoric should be reigned in is a good one.
Let’s start by slapping offenders on the left into shape!
A sick, despicable coward named Jared Loughner turned an ordinary shopping center in Tucson, Arizona into a killing field on Saturday morning. This deranged monster murdered six innocent people in cold blood, including a nine-year-old girl, and inflicted severe injuries on several others, including Rep. Gabrielle Giffords.
Unfortunately, the tragedy and sorrow of this awful day were magnified when, in some quarters, the events in Tucson were blamed on “right-wing” extremists.
The implication was that hard-edged rhetoric broadcast by Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck had somehow driven the 22-year-old Loughner into the abyss of insanity and murder.
Unbelievably, some even tried to blame the carnage directly on Sarah Palin.
As one who has listened to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck for years and years, I admit that I have never—never!—heard any of these conservative superstars even come close to suggesting that any form of violence should be used to advance conservative principles.
For sure, Limbaugh, Hannity, and Beck routinely express very strong opinions about the massive intrusion of government into the lives of the American people, spending by Congress which has exploded the federal deficit, and the socialist change advocated by Barack Obama.
Strong opinions and a call for resistance, yes. But violence of any sort? Never!
However, the Tucson slaughter has led many to call for an easing of the harsh rhetoric and hate speech.
I agree.
In fact, the following examples of outrageous rhetoric should serve as warnings to all:
Left Wing Host Jokes About Shooting George W. Bush
While Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck have never joked about killing Barack Obama, left-wing radio talk show hostess Randi Rhodes once suggested that President George W. Bush should be shot.
As reported in the media, Rhodes said the following:
"The (leader) is the president of the United States, so why doesn't his father or his brother … take him out for a little fishing, and let him say some Hail Marys – he loves God so much. … You know, Hail Mary, full of grace, God is with thee – pow [gunshot sound] – works for me."
Now THAT is reckless and irresponsible!
Congressional Democrats Say “F” the President
President Obama’s “deal” with Republicans to extend the Bush tax cuts to all, including the well-to- do, spawned extreme rage from those on the far-left of the Democrat party.
This leftist rage was reported in the media where congressional reporter Carl Hulse revealed that “Vulgar words were aimed at President Obama” during a closed-door meeting of Democratic House members, a fact initially reported by Roll Call.
To be precise, the words were “F*** the President.”
That sort of language directed at a sitting president could cause a barely- sane person to take insane action, and is otherwise the sort of rhetoric that should be avoided, especially by members of the president’s own party.
Bringing Guns to Knife Fights
During the 2008 presidential campaign, Candidate Barack Obama himself resorted to extreme rhetoric on occasion, including this quote:
“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said in Philadelphia last night. “Because from what I understand, folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”
Surely a brilliant orator like Barack Obama could conjure up a less violent way to motivate his base?
This is even more dangerous rhetoric that should be avoided.
Republicans and Hand to Hand Combat
Barack Obama’s use of violent language did not end with his inauguration to the U.S. presidency.
In fact, on October 7 of 2010, President Obama said the following:
“A Republican majority in Congress would mean “hand-to-hand combat” on Capitol Hill for the next two years, threatening policies Democrats have enacted to stabilize the economy, President Obama warned Wednesday.”
Hand to hand combat? Is that sort of war-like language really necessary, Mr. President?
Is there not a danger that some unhinged soul might see your words as a declaration of war against fellow Americans who just happen to be Republicans?
Jesse Jackson: Cutting Obama’s Nuts Off
As reported in the media, the Reverend Jesse Jackson chose to use very graphic and violent language during the 2008 campaign to describe his disaffection with candidate Barack Obama.
“Jackson was caught on tape during a Fox News interview saying that he believed Obama was “talking down to black people,” remarking on recent speeches the Illinois senator made about fathers taking care of their children.
“I want to cut his nuts off,” Jackson later remarked.
Even though Reverend Jackson is of the same race and political ideology as Barack Obama, that sort of language is unacceptable for broadcast into homes where young, impressionable and unstable minds tune in.
It is also quite Un-Christian, Reverend!
In sum, the notion that vulgar, demeaning rhetoric should be reigned in is a good one.
Let’s start by slapping offenders on the left into shape!
7.1.11
Ship Them ALL Out, Including Anchor Brats!
John W. Lillpop
Illegal aliens who scheme to have anchor babies born in America just to avoid justice (through deportation) are among the most despicable criminals in our midst.
Only Democrat and RINO politicians are less honorable.
By callously manipulating infants for personal gain, illegal aliens clearly lack the moral values and judgment essential to being good Americans.
Moreover, the presence of anchor babies gives weak-minded knot heads who favor open borders and non-enforcement of immigration laws a lame excuse for doing nothing.
Again, infants are manipulated for political purposes by those who scream "We cannot split families," when arguing against deportation.
However, that argument is embarrassingly specious.
To begin with, illegal aliens willfully abandon family when they leave their nation of origin, usually Mexico, in order to invade America!
Apparently, "Family" is trumped by dinero when deciding whether or not to jump a fence to pursue the mother lode, AKA free public services, in America!
Secondly, deportation decisions cannot be based on whether or not the offending criminal has a family.
Consider a parallel: Illegal aliens are like bank robbers--they steal property belonging to others.
However, when an American citizen is found guilty of robbing a bank, does the presiding judge decide against prison because of concern about separating the criminal from family?
Of course not!
Criminals are criminals, and should be dealt with according to the law, especially when it comes to illegal aliens.
Third: Who says that the illegal alien family has to be split?
For illegal aliens with children under 18, it should be mandatory that the entire family be deported!
In fact, because they are the most burdensome to American taxpayers, deporting such families should be the greatest priority of our federal government.
In other words, Pancho, get the hell out and take your moochachoo brats with you!
Finally, instead of trying to convert the U.S. into a suburb of Mexico, Democrats should value American culture and language, rule of law, and American sovereignty and work to close the anchor baby loophole with respect to children of illegal aliens.
But perhaps that is asking too much?
After all, most liberals see anchor babies as future Democrat voters!
6.1.11
Nancy Pelosi's Odd Victory Lap
By John W. Lillpop
If one did not know better, one would have thought that Nancy Pelosi was being installed for another term as Speaker of the House.
Indeed, the deposed Speaker was perfectly radiant with smiles and good cheer; signs one would expect from a politician who had won a particularly brutal battle but who, in the end, had been vindicated.
She spoke endlessly about her many notable achievements and that of the 111Th Congress. It was though John Boehner and the army of conservative Republicans waiting in the wings to take over did not exist.
Smile, smile, and more smiles.
Never mind that three score plus House Democrats joined the ranks of the unemployed as of January 5th, a historic purging that many attribute to Pelosi’s far-left ideological bent and heavy-handed skulduggery in administering the business of the House.
Never mind that just moments earlier, 19 surviving Democrats voted against Pelosi in an election to select House minority leader.
Never mind that the presidency of Barack Obama was officially effectively run into a ditch with Pelosi and Senator Harry Reid behind the wheel.
Never mind that the American people roundly rejected the far-left policies that are held in such high esteem in San Francisco, but with utter contempt in most other parts of the nation.
From the show that she was putting on, one would naturally assume that January 5 was a great day in Pelosi’s life and an occasion for celebration and victory laps.
In the end, however, the show ended and Nancy Pelosi reluctantly handed the Speaker’s gavel over to John Boehner.
Thus, the People’s House is (hopefully) back in the hands of a leader who will listen to the will of the people.
5.1.11
Happy Independence Day, America!
By John W. Lillpop
No, you have not slept away six months. There is no outside BBQ, or a fireworks show later tonight. No parade to celebrate the 235th birthday of America.
Still, even though there is snow on the ground and a bitter chill in the air, we Americans have much to celebrate on this day because with the installation of the 112th Congress, sanity, common sense, and good will toward America will once again prevail in the U.S. House and be more prominent in the Senate.
Both chambers will be more reflective of the values and mores of the overwhelming majority of Americans.
There will be quick action to repeal the nightmare called ObamaCare. Cutting spending will be a major fiscal priority. The deficit will be addressed honestly and with vigor.
And best of all, the Speaker's gavel will be extracted from Nancy Pelosi and awarded to a responsible, normal adult.
This is vital, because from January 4, 2007 through January 4, 2011, Nancy Pelosi “served” as Speaker of the House of Representatives, a position which, by law, placed her right behind the vice president in the line of succession to the U.S. presidency.
Had grave misfortune or a deliberate act of malice snuffed out the Bush-Cheney or Obama-Biden team, Nancy Pelosi would have moved into the Oval Office and assumed the bully pulpit of the most powerful person on the planet.
To those who blanch at the mere thought of a Sarah Palin Presidency, a far worse calamity would have ensued had the presidency fallen into the hands of that incompetent Marxist from San Francisco.
Imagine Nancy Pelosi as Commander-in-Chief over the brave young men and women serving in harm’s way in wars that Pelosi would, if she could, refuse to fund. Wars fought against enemies that Pelosi would surrender to, given the chance?
Imagine President Pelosi confronting the massive federal deficit and out-of-control spending with even more spending and greater deficits. Is there a more frightening prospect?
Imagine President Pelosi on the issue of taxes. No doubt she would use the tax code to punish the successful and prosperous by redistributing their wealth to the mediocre, untalented, slovenly, and unmotivated. And to illegal aliens.
Imagine President Pelosi on the issue of illegal aliens. Pelosi it will be recalled is on record as stating that enforcement of the law through deportation of illegal aliens is “un-American.” How long before another 20-40 million illegals would be allowed to invade the U.S.?
However, serendipity will out.
The horror of Nancy Pelosi will be replaced by common sense conservatives who love America and despise those who would willfully bring harm to this great nation.
Nancy Pelosi will NOT ascend to the Presidency, a fact for which all Americans should be most grateful.
4.1.11
Obama’s “I Won!” Reduced to “Can’t We All Get Along?”
By John W. Lillpop
Shortly after his conquest of the White House in early 2009, President Barack Obama allegedly chided Congressional Republicans with the refrain, “I Won!” meant to warn the GOP that it his star that was rising, and it was he who was the favored one, not only in the U.S. but throughout the globe.
That was then.
Now, after a solid “shellacking” in mid-term elections, and two years of failure as president, Barack Obama is whistling a different tune.
As reported at the reference, in part:
What happened to all of that misplaced arrogance and fool-hearted swagger, Mr. President?
The big question: Can President Obama stuff his size XXXXXXXXXX super-ego in the trash bin, and accept Republican ideas and leaders as representative of the will of the American people?
Reference: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110104/ap_on_re_us/us_obama_return_to_washington
Shortly after his conquest of the White House in early 2009, President Barack Obama allegedly chided Congressional Republicans with the refrain, “I Won!” meant to warn the GOP that it his star that was rising, and it was he who was the favored one, not only in the U.S. but throughout the globe.
That was then.
Now, after a solid “shellacking” in mid-term elections, and two years of failure as president, Barack Obama is whistling a different tune.
As reported at the reference, in part:
AIR FORCE ONE – Ending a two-week vacation, President Barack Obama is appealing to newly-empowered Republicans to resist jockeying for the White House in 2012 and work with him to get the economy growing and the jobless back to work.
Facing anything but a political soft landing after his holiday stay in Hawaii, Obama told reporters en route to the capital Tuesday that he understands Republicans, who recaptured the House in last fall's elections, "are going to play to their base for a certain period of time."
What happened to all of that misplaced arrogance and fool-hearted swagger, Mr. President?
The big question: Can President Obama stuff his size XXXXXXXXXX super-ego in the trash bin, and accept Republican ideas and leaders as representative of the will of the American people?
Reference: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110104/ap_on_re_us/us_obama_return_to_washington
Dodging Unthinkable Horror on January 5
By John W. Lillpop
From January 4, 2007 through January 4, 2011, Nancy Pelosi “served” as Speaker of the House of Representatives, a position which, by law, placed her right behind the vice president in the line of succession to the U.S. presidency.
Had grave misfortune or a deliberate act of malice snuffed out the Bush-Cheney or Obama-Biden team, Nancy Pelosi would have moved into the Oval Office and assumed the bully pulpit of the most powerful person on the planet.
To those who blanch at the mere thought of a Sarah Palin Presidency, a far worse calamity would have ensued had the presidency fallen into the hands of that incompetent Marxist from San Francisco.
Imagine Nancy Pelosi as Commander-in-Chief over the brave young men and women serving in harm’s way in wars that Pelosi would, if she could, refuse to fund. Wars fought against enemies that Pelosi would surrender to, given the chance?
Imagine President Pelosi confronting the massive federal deficit and out-of-control spending with even more spending and greater deficits. Is there a more frightening prospect?
Imagine President Pelosi on the issue of taxes. No doubt she would use the tax code to punish the successful and prosperous by redistributing their wealth to the mediocre, untalented, slovenly, and unmotivated. And to illegal aliens.
Imagine President Pelosi on the issue of illegal aliens. Pelosi it will be recalled is on record as stating that enforcement of the law through deportation of illegal aliens is “un-American.” How long before another 20-40 million illegals would be allowed to invade the U.S.?
However, serendipity will out.
The horror of Nancy Pelosi will be replaced by common sense conservatives who love America and despise those who would willfully bring harm to this great nation.
Nancy Pelosi will NOT ascend to the Presidency, a fact for which all Americans should be most grateful.
From January 4, 2007 through January 4, 2011, Nancy Pelosi “served” as Speaker of the House of Representatives, a position which, by law, placed her right behind the vice president in the line of succession to the U.S. presidency.
Had grave misfortune or a deliberate act of malice snuffed out the Bush-Cheney or Obama-Biden team, Nancy Pelosi would have moved into the Oval Office and assumed the bully pulpit of the most powerful person on the planet.
To those who blanch at the mere thought of a Sarah Palin Presidency, a far worse calamity would have ensued had the presidency fallen into the hands of that incompetent Marxist from San Francisco.
Imagine Nancy Pelosi as Commander-in-Chief over the brave young men and women serving in harm’s way in wars that Pelosi would, if she could, refuse to fund. Wars fought against enemies that Pelosi would surrender to, given the chance?
Imagine President Pelosi confronting the massive federal deficit and out-of-control spending with even more spending and greater deficits. Is there a more frightening prospect?
Imagine President Pelosi on the issue of taxes. No doubt she would use the tax code to punish the successful and prosperous by redistributing their wealth to the mediocre, untalented, slovenly, and unmotivated. And to illegal aliens.
Imagine President Pelosi on the issue of illegal aliens. Pelosi it will be recalled is on record as stating that enforcement of the law through deportation of illegal aliens is “un-American.” How long before another 20-40 million illegals would be allowed to invade the U.S.?
However, serendipity will out.
The horror of Nancy Pelosi will be replaced by common sense conservatives who love America and despise those who would willfully bring harm to this great nation.
Nancy Pelosi will NOT ascend to the Presidency, a fact for which all Americans should be most grateful.
3.1.11
U.S. House Should Repeal Social Security Along with ObamaCare!
By John W. Lillpop
To the best of my recollection, I never agreed to purchase retirement insurance, AKA, Social Security.
Rather, it was mandated by a fascist government that I purchase it. My wishes were irrelevant.
Even more tyrannical, the premiums have been taken directly from my check and sent to some nameless, faceless bureaucrat in Washington, D.C. who does only-God- knows- what with the money.
Even more distressing, this retirement account, like all adventures promoted by Progressives, is a Ponzi scheme that has no hope of remaining solvent, or meeting the needs of those forced to buy.
The government decides unilaterally what the monthly premiums will be; there is no open competition. The government also determines, on its own, the amount of pay out—they call it AWARD amount—that the victim is eligible to receive after paying into the black box for 50 years or so.
This outrage is even more maddening because the government may decide to delay the date on which I begin to receive back from the monies I have involuntarily poured into the pathetic system for all these many decades.
In turn, the Social Security scam has spawned the Medicare Ponzi Scheme which, although it is not required, is another non-sustainable program administered by dim wits too stupid to survive in the real world. Soon Medicare will run out of money leaving tens of millions of baby boomers in the lurch.
The Democrat Party’s exclusive ownership of entitlements was broken when President George W. Bush signed the Medicare Part D prescription scheme which added trillions to the future obligations of Americans decades away from being born.
Thanks for exactly nada, W.!
W.’s misstep was followed by the ObamaCare debacle which will dump trillions of additional debt on the backs of those who will be born in 2040 or 2050.
What to do in the interests of the class of 2075?
Well, Mr. Boehner and Tea Party activists, why not the Mother of all repeals to ring in the New Year?
One omnibus repeal bill to wipe out Social Security, Medicare, the Part D prescription drug insanity, and the idiocy called ObamaCare?
Repeal the whole damn lot—do it for the children!
To the best of my recollection, I never agreed to purchase retirement insurance, AKA, Social Security.
Rather, it was mandated by a fascist government that I purchase it. My wishes were irrelevant.
Even more tyrannical, the premiums have been taken directly from my check and sent to some nameless, faceless bureaucrat in Washington, D.C. who does only-God- knows- what with the money.
Even more distressing, this retirement account, like all adventures promoted by Progressives, is a Ponzi scheme that has no hope of remaining solvent, or meeting the needs of those forced to buy.
The government decides unilaterally what the monthly premiums will be; there is no open competition. The government also determines, on its own, the amount of pay out—they call it AWARD amount—that the victim is eligible to receive after paying into the black box for 50 years or so.
This outrage is even more maddening because the government may decide to delay the date on which I begin to receive back from the monies I have involuntarily poured into the pathetic system for all these many decades.
In turn, the Social Security scam has spawned the Medicare Ponzi Scheme which, although it is not required, is another non-sustainable program administered by dim wits too stupid to survive in the real world. Soon Medicare will run out of money leaving tens of millions of baby boomers in the lurch.
The Democrat Party’s exclusive ownership of entitlements was broken when President George W. Bush signed the Medicare Part D prescription scheme which added trillions to the future obligations of Americans decades away from being born.
Thanks for exactly nada, W.!
W.’s misstep was followed by the ObamaCare debacle which will dump trillions of additional debt on the backs of those who will be born in 2040 or 2050.
What to do in the interests of the class of 2075?
Well, Mr. Boehner and Tea Party activists, why not the Mother of all repeals to ring in the New Year?
One omnibus repeal bill to wipe out Social Security, Medicare, the Part D prescription drug insanity, and the idiocy called ObamaCare?
Repeal the whole damn lot—do it for the children!
Eric Holder Uses DOJ to Elect Democrats!
By John W. Lillpop
In an astonishing example of the anti-American tyranny used by Attorney General Eric Holder, the Department of Justice, in cahoots with a court, has acted to assure that Democrats prevail in North Carolina elections and that black candidates are elected.
This extraordinary story is reported, in part, at reference 1:
Exactly when did it become the role of the DOJ to determine election results? Has Eric Holder lost his mind?
Reference 1: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=246289
In an astonishing example of the anti-American tyranny used by Attorney General Eric Holder, the Department of Justice, in cahoots with a court, has acted to assure that Democrats prevail in North Carolina elections and that black candidates are elected.
This extraordinary story is reported, in part, at reference 1:
The U.S. Justice Department has demanded – and a federal judge has agreed – that residents of a North Carolina city cannot make their municipal elections nonpartisan because the Obama administration representatives don't like the possible outcomes that could result.
The result comes in a recent case involving Kinston, where voters overwhelmingly – the victory margin was about 2-1 – decided they wanted to leave the political affiliations off of candidates' names in their city elections.
Not so fast, said Barack Obama's Justice Department. If the affiliations are left off, a few white voters might not know who was the Democrat, and they might vote for a member of another party, the federal officials warned, and that can't be allowed.
Kinston's plan was simple: make the elections nonpartisan so that voters would choose a name, not a political party.
However, the U.S. attorney general ordered the election results voided because "removing the partisan cue in municipal elections will, in all likelihood, eliminate the single factor that allows black candidates to be elected to office."
Exactly when did it become the role of the DOJ to determine election results? Has Eric Holder lost his mind?
Reference 1: http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=246289
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)