Marco Rubio: Just Another Reckless Hispanic Racist!

By John W. Lillpop


For all his charisma and alleged charm, Republican Marco Rubio has one awfully grotesque character flaw: The man is a dedicated Hispanic racist.

How else to characterize a man who believes that people of his race should be exempt from the existing laws and borders which exist to assure US sovereignty and the safety and security of American citizens?

Other than their ethnicity, Senator Rubio, what exactly makes Hispanics/Latinos worthy of amnesty and special consideration? Why should they be above the law?

Why should they not be rounded up and deported, ASAP?

The US government claims there are 11 million illegal aliens squatting in the shadows, most of whom are Latino.

Good heavens, there are more than 11 million in Los Angeles, alone, Senator!

Truth is, the Obama administration is low-balling the number to keep the public from revolting—the real number is closer to 20 million, or more, non-English speaking moochers here illegally!

All clamoring for freedom, liberty, and the American way, Senator?

Or, more honestly, here for the food stamps, welfare, free health care, free education and the sanctuary provided by brain-dead politicians who have zero respect for American law, language and culture?

For the sake of argument, pretend for a moment that Obama is correct about the numbers. Even as unlikely as that may be, 11 million is still a huge number of unwelcome interlopers!

The population in some states and even some nations is less than 11 million!

Think: What other nation on the planet would allow 11 million foreigners who do not speak the language, and who are mostly uneducated and unskilled, to invade its borders and violate its laws while costing citizen taxpayers more than $100 billion per year?

And other than the US,  what nation would be stupid enough to reward the interlopers with pain-free citizenship through amnesty?

Answer: None!

For instance, what would happen if 11 million wandering Latinos from south of its borders descended upon the failed state of Mexico?

How long would it take for the corrupt Mexican government and its allied drug cartels to institute a fix, a solution where amnesty would not even be considered?

The fact is, America owes NOTHING to the millions of plundering invaders who came here illegally and whom have no legal or spiritual basis for being here.

Yes, we are a nation of immigrants!

But America was made great by those who followed the law, waited their turn in line, and took advantage of the opportunities offered here by learning English and assimilating!

Jumping a fence and racing to public assistance centers while refusing to learn English is just not the same, Senator!

To those millions forced to hide in the shadows, if the Statue of Liberty could speak, the grand lady might say:

Sorry about the “shadows” amigos, but you do have the option of getting your ass in gear, pointed in a southerly direction, and going home to escape those awful shadows!

Shadows are not mandatory—you are free to get the hell out and end your unlawful occupation  and not-so-petty larceny at any time!

 Why should America reward people for breaking our laws and ignoring our borders while we tell millions of others (many well educated and respectable) that they must wait in line and follow the law?

What is it about the Latino that entitles him or her to ignore the law? Where is the sense of fair play and justice in the Hispanic mind set?

Again, Senator Rubio: Other than ethnic origin, what is it that you find so compelling about illegal aliens?

The Next Step in Liberal Insanity: The Illegal Invader Bill of Rights

By John W. Lillpop


With illegal invaders the hottest political topic in Washington these days, there is word of an emerging “Illegal invader Bill of Rights” which Democrats are expected to introduce on the floor of the US Senate.

Prominent Democrats have announced that if such a bill falters in Congress, President Obama has reserved the right to issue an Executive Order to effect its implementation. Retroactively, no less!

The Democrat-Marxist bill of rights for illegal aliens is expected to include the following leftist pap:

* There is NO such thing as an “illegal” human being;

* Concepts of nationality and citizenship which confer special rights and advantages upon individuals based on arbitrary factors such as place of birth are ‘old school’ nonsense.

Enlightened peoples the world over now understand that All human beings are born into the family of World Citizens, regardless of the exact place of birth, and that citizenship is fungible based on where the citizen is at any given time;

* Borders are antithetical to the concept of universal human freedom and are understood to be barriers erected by “haves” to prevent the oppressed and poor from securing a “fair share” of the abundance created for all.

As such, borders are evil manifestations of greed and exclusivity, which are to be ignored when said borders interfere with the inalienable right to the pursuit of happiness by the individual world citizen, wherever and whenever said world citizen may choose to exercise such right;

* All world citizens are automatically imbued with certain inalienable rights which shall not be infringed upon in any manner by any government or other human entity, including religious institutions;

* These inalienable rights shall include the unimpeded right to the pursuit of happiness, regardless of ability to pay;

* Such rights guarantee to each world citizen, the following rights: The acquisition and enjoyment of comfortable housing; adequate, delicious, and nourishing foods specific to the religious and ethnic needs of the individual; advanced health care (regardless of pre-existing conditions), including contraception and abortion services, dental care, prescription medications, and all other care as may be necessary for abundant, care-free living; advanced education based solely on the ability, aptitude, and interest of the individual citizen; and access to high-speed internet service, Wi-Fi connections, and all communications technology generally available to the paying public.

Said rights are not all inclusive and may be added to or enhanced, but never diminished or withdrawn.

* Driving and voting are among the most sacred rights owned by each and every world citizen. Discriminatory practices such as citizenship status, registration, voter ID, vision and driving tests, and others are not to tolerated in civil societies;

* Unrestricted access to public services such as food stamps, welfare and other entitlement programs is vital to the pursuit of happiness and shall, therefore, always be available to all world citizens;

* Each world citizen, regardless of race, religion, nation of origin, sexual orientation, political affiliation, credit, criminal, or medical history, is a unique expression of the creator, and as such, is owed the utmost in respect and acceptance from society at large.

Terms like illegal, anchor baby, alien, wet back, moocher, invader, and the like are dehumanizing and injurious to the esteem and dignity of world citizens. Use of such terms is considered a major hate crime subject to severe punishment under the law, except when terms like Gringo, racist pig, white trash and other words are used to truthfully identify the root cause of all of humanity’s woes.

In sum, the legitimate rights of disaffected world citizens can be gleaned from the words spoken by Zeituni Onyango, illegal-alien aunt of President Obama.

She said:

“If I come as an immigrant, you have the obligation to make me a citizen,” Zeituni Onyango said.”

Where do you suppose Auntie got that warped view of the world?

Aunt Onyango, the perfect spokesperson and poster child for the Illegal Invader bill of rights!

Obama Got It ‘Backasswards’: Should Ban Invaders and Defend the Constitution!

By John W. Lillpop

\Once again our befuddled president has proven that he simply is not qualified for high office, based on his inability to execute the oath of office administered to him-- TWICE, for heavens sake, on January 20th!

Had he been paying attention as the oath was being administered, Obama would understand that it is his duty is to DEFEND the Constitution, not work 24/7 to circumvent and destroy that grand ‘old school’ work of art that has kept America’s experiment with self-governance alive and well for over 233 years.

Obama’s lack of comprehension may help explain why he has waged an all-out campaign AGAINST the 2nd Amendment, while at nearly the same time, DEFENDING foreign moochers against the rule of law, as in the case of illegal aliens.

That’s “backasswards, Barack!”

Stop what you are doing and immediately call a press conference and announce that, due to your liberal mental disorder, you need to issue two revised executive orders as follows:



1. Support for the proposed Comprehensive Immigration Reform nonsense is hereby cancelled and Janet Napolitano is ordered to commence an aggressive and immediate removal of all illegal invaders from US territory, including all Obama aunts, uncles and other relatives squatting here illegally! No exceptions, and

2. The 23 ill-advised Executive Orders intended to usurp the 2nd Amendment are withdrawn in total. This president shall protect and defend the Constitution in accordance with the sworn oath which allowed him to resume occupancy of the Oval Office.

BASSAKWARDS—It’s a common malady of those who worship at the altar of liberal idiocy!



We need to correct it NOW!

Why Not Give "Rule of Law" a Chance?

By John W. Lillpop





As the amnesty wars heat up again, politicians in Washington are wringing their hands in angst at what to do next. The status quo, they say, is unacceptable.

They are quite right about that, you know.



But America does NOT need to legalize tens of millions of illegal aliens in order to solve the illegal alien nightmare.

Existing laws, while not perfect, provide a more than adequate remedy. Those laws prohibit U.S. employers from hiring illegal aliens and mandate deportation of those here illegally.

All that is lacking is a commitment on the part of the president and the U.S. Congress to uphold their constitutional responsibilities.


Why not try this simple formula?
* Secure the borders with military force;

* Prosecute employers who hire illegal aliens, and

* Enforce all immigration laws, including deportations.

Or, to steal and bastardize a slogan from past anti-war campaigns, "Give Rule of Law a Chance!"

Senator Jeff Sessions: A Rare Advocate for Common Sense and the Rule of Law!

By John W. Lillpop


As the air in and around Washington, D.C. becomes polluted with the foolish musings of politicians eager to trash America’s legacy and commitment to the rule of law in order to pander to millions of foreign moochers who have no legal or spiritual basis for being here, a lone voice breaks through the slime and sludge and reaffirms that there are still Americans who give a damn about this nation, its culture, and future.

That would be Senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama who is taking the unusual (for Washington!) position of advocating common sense to the suddenly red-hot debate concerning illegal invaders.

As reported at the reference, the good Senator is a breath of fresh air, especially among Republicans who have decided to abandon America in droves:


WASHINGTON—U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), Ranking Member of the Senate Budget Committee and former Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, issued the following statement on the new push for comprehensive immigration reform and amnesty:

“Americans overwhelmingly oppose illegal immigration. They have pleaded with Congress to end the mass illegality for decades to little avail. All the while, millions have been added to the total of those illegally here.

It’s time to fix that broken system. Now we are told that the Obama Administration and members of Congress say they have a plan that they promise will do the job. So, the American people will need to watch closely. And, members of Congress must insist that they have a full and complete opportunity to study and amend such legislation.

We would be in a much better position to achieve immigration reform if the Obama Administration had spent that last four years enforcing federal law rather than dismantling it. Brave immigration agents have been left with no recourse but to sue their own Department head, simply so that they—like any other law officers—will be allowed to do their jobs…The first task for every media agency in the country ought to be to study this lawsuit, to listen to the long-documented complaints of ICE agents, and to review the record of stymied attempts at congressional oversight of DHS. What good are promises of future enforcement when the Administration covertly undermines those laws now in place?”

Just last Friday a federal judge made an important preliminary ruling in their favor. The ICE union also held their own agency head, John Morton, in no confidence with a unanimous vote.

No comprehensive plan can pass Congress as long as this administration continues to defy existing federal law.

Yet, without consulting the law officers who have the duty to enforce the law, another group of senators, meeting in secret—just like the last time comprehensive reform failed—have set forth an outline with no legislative language. We have seen too often before that the promises made by bill sponsors do not match up to the reality when the language is produced. No secret accord with profound consequences for this nation’s future can be rushed through. That means a full committee process and debate and amendments on the floor of the Senate.

Several points need to be understood. Amnesty will not help balance our budget. In fact, a large-scale amnesty is likely to add trillions of dollars to the debt over time, accelerate Medicare’s and Social Security’s slide into insolvency, and put enormous strain on our public assistance programs. We know already that the administration refuses to enforce existing law restricting immigrant welfare use, and in fact promotes expanded welfare use to immigrants—including food stamps, public housing, and Medicaid. I joined with four Ranking Members to obtain answers from the Department of Homeland Security about this evisceration of law, and the Administration has suspiciously defied three consecutive oversight requests.

These and other critical issues must be carefully considered as we go forward. Certainly, our current system is broken. Work must be done to fix it. That effort must occur.

All Americans, immigrant and native born, will have a better future if American continues to stand unique among nations for the special reverence it places in the rule of law.”



God Bless Jeff Sessions! And listen up RINOs in both houses!





Ref: http://www.wtvy.com/home/headlines/Sessions-Comprehensive-Reform-Wont-Pass-As-Long-As-Admin-Defies-Existing-Immigration-Law-188735161.html

Why Even Consider a “Path to Citizenship” for Invading Criminals?

By John W. Lillpop


Barack Obama’s latest ploy in the intended eradication of American Exceptionalism and dumbification of our culture, language, and legacy involves the legalization of millions of invading criminals who will vote for the candidate(s) that coughs up the most booty.

In other words, illegal aliens will universally support tax and spend liberals, those treasonous bastards who are not above buying votes with US taxpayer money.

Political ideology be damned!

Illegals from south of our borders do not give a hoot about US sovereignty, language, borders, history, culture or grandiose notions such as liberty, freedom, democracy, fairness, and other esoteric distractions.

Which makes the Democrat Party the perfect fit for invading criminals!

Its all about the goodies—food stamps, welfare, free health care, and cash. Mooching off the US taxpayer is a career path for illegals.

Unfortunately, the White House and the halls of Congress are stuffed with anti-rule of law creeps who share the illegal alien disdain for democratic principles, basic fairness, and rule of law.

Which is why the word amnesty is once again on the political agenda for those who hate America, including recent recruits on the Republican side of the aisle like Marco Rubio who join folks like Lindsay Graham, John McCain, and other stalwart RINOS who actually believe that Hispandering to invading criminals will persuade more Hispanics to support conservative candidates and principles in future elections.

Are you serious, RINOs?

Greedy invading criminals will always gravitate to the Marxists who will promise to redistribute wealth from US taxpayers to the criminal invaders!

Illegal immigration is, in fact, all about unlawful redistribution of wealth!

Conservative concepts such as lower taxes and spending, welfare reform, secure borders, smaller government and other pro-American notions are not now, and never will be, winning themes for attracting the entitlement mooches who come here by the tens of millions from third-world disasters south of our borders.

With our nation more than $ 16 trillion is debt and growing, and with unemployment stuck on ugly, how does it make any sense whatsoever to legalize millions of criminal invaders, which only will inspire even millions more to invade?

Why are our politicians so GD determined to ruin America?

The latest proposed nonsense apparently would make millions of illegals illegal, including a “Path to Citizenship” for the invaders.

Sorry, Washington, but America does not need no ‘stinkin’ path to citizenship’ for invaders who have ignored our borders and laws!

Besides, there IS a path to citizenship already in place. Its called legal immigration.

Albeit, it involves more than jumping a fence and racing north to the nearest food stamp and welfare center.

Legal immigration requires background checks for medical, financial, and criminal histories that could pose a burden on American citizens.

What prevents Latinos, among others, from applying for citizenship just like any other person from any other part of the world?

How can America sanction illegal aliens from Mexico while rejecting refugees from Haiti?

Bottom line: There is a ‘path to citizenship’ already in place!

Those interested in coming to America need to respect our borders and laws AND wait their turn in line!

It’s the American way!

Barack Obama Goes, “Shooting All the Time"?

By John W. Lillpop

Barack Obama’s reputation as an anti-2nd-Amendment, anti-gun Marxist bent on disarming the great unwashed masses in America suffered a severe hit recently with the shocking confession that The One goes “shooting all the time.”

Somehow the image of Barack Obama armed with anything more potent than a golf putter strains credulity to the limit.

Nonetheless, as reported at the reference:

Asked in a magazine interview whether he had ever fired a gun, Mr. Obama said he did so with guests at the president's rural retreat.

"Up at Camp David, we do skeet shooting all the time," he said. "And I have a profound respect for the traditions of hunting that trace back in this country for generations.

"And I think those who dismiss that out of hand make a big mistake".

Mr. Obama's plans for tighter firearms regulations were drawn up by Joe Biden, his vice-president, following the massacre of 26 people, including 20 young pupils at a primary school in Connecticut last month.

Mr. Biden – whose proposals also include a background check system on all Americans trying to buy guns and a 10-shot limit for ammunition clips – has been quick to note that he owns a shotgun.

The president, however, rarely speaks personally about firearms, and is dismissed by many enthusiasts as an elite urban law professor who does not appreciate America's heritage of gun ownership.

He accepted in his interview that gun culture in rural areas was "very different" to that in urban areas, such as his home town of Chicago, where it is more frequently linked to serious crime.”

But then again, everything in Chicago is linked to serious crime!

Still, there we have it from the horse’s very mouth. The Messiah shoots skeet!

The big question: Can The One shoot skeet and walk on water at the same time?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/9830016/Barack-Obama-I-go-shooting-all-the-time.html

Hillary’s Hysterical Breakdown Confirms Her Lack of Fitness for Higher Office!

By John W. Lillpop


During her emotional breakdown before the Congress last week, congenital liar and “Stand By Her Man” dupe Hillary Rodham Clinton exposed just how unstable and incapable of handling stress she really is.

The occasion was the very important and appropriate investigation of the slaughter of four American diplomats at Benghazi, Libya last September 11. Despite the claims of Clinton apologists, including that sawed-off little runt from California, the despicable “Don’t call me madam” leftist Barbara Boxer, the inquiry was NOT a witch hunt—although if it were, who better to interrogate than the Hildabeast?

Keep in mind, all Hillary had to do was to HONESTYLY  answer a few questions posed by Senators and Representatives working to understand how in the hell an American embassy could be so ill-prepared on the anniversary of September 11?

And why more was not done to support the American diplomats, including additional security protection?  And why was the American pubic mislead and lied to by Susan Rice and other Obama administration officials for weeks after the terrorist assault?

All of this just weeks before a presidential election in which Barack Obama was trying to sell his alleged “decimation” of Al-Quaeda as proof of his foreign policy savvy?

Why was the Hildabeast so unraveled by the questions?  Or was she spooked at being “Under Oath” and subject to perjury---if her testimony was clouded by lies?

Whatever the driver, the fact is that Hillary exploded in an emotional outburst of the sort one would expect from a high-school girl being asked to explain her contraception and abortion habits by a skeptical parent.

WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE?, she exclaimed as if to say, Obama won the damn election, so get over it and let the Benghazi diplomats rest in peace!

Anyone foolish enough to even consider Hillary Clinton as a viable candidate for the presidency in 2016 should remember her testimony as the words of a hysterical woman totally unfit for higher office!

DEMOCRAT Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ) Must Be Recalled!

By John W. Lillpop

DEMOCRAT Bob Menendez, Senator from New Jersey, seems to have a penchant for employing illegal aliens, even those who are registered sex offenders. He also favors dalliances with under age prostitutes in the Dominican Republic.

And when Menendez’s employment of illegal aliens is discovered too close to an important election, the wily Senator is not above using his influence to quash a breaking news arrest until after the election.

And you wonder how lame-brained Democrats like Harry Reid continue to hold the majority in the US Senate?

The answer is corruption, corruption, and more corruption!

By all rights, Menendez should have been exposed in the national media as a perverted scoundrel who aided and abetted the lawlessness of Luis Abrahan Sanchez Zavaleta, a convicted sex offender and illegal.

This disclosure should have been forthcoming before the November 6 election. Had transparency been a practice rather than problem in the Obama anti-rule of law cabal, media exposure might have unraveled Menendez’s reelection and made the Senate more American with the election of an honest Republican, provided one could be found.

As reported in the media (Reference 1), after the election was stolen:

WASHINGTON (AP) — Sen. Robert Menendez employed as an unpaid intern in his Senate office an illegal immigrant who was a registered sex offender, now under arrest by immigration authorities, The Associated Press has learned. The Homeland Security Department instructed federal agents not to arrest him until after Election Day, a U.S. official involved in the case told the AP.

A Homeland Security spokesman, Peter Boogaard, said Wednesday that it was “categorically false” that the department delayed the arrest of Luis Abrahan Sanchez Zavaleta, 18, until after the election.
Sanchez, an immigrant from Peru, was arrested by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in front of his home in New Jersey on Dec. 6, two federal officials said. Sanchez, who entered the country on a now-expired visitor visa from Peru, is facing deportation and remains in custody.
The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss details of Sanchez’s immigration case.”

There is more: Menendez’s crimes apparently extend beyond the US borders as the Senator reportedly journeyed for fun and games with under aged prostitutes, as reported in reference 2:

Documents published online for the first time Thursday indicate that the FBI opened an inquiry into New Jersey Democratic Sen. Bob Menendez on August 1, 2012, focusing on repeated trips he took to the Dominican Republic with longtime campaign contributor and Miami eye doctor Salomon Melgen. TheDC reported in November that Menendez purchased the service of prostitutes in that Caribbean nation at a series of alcohol-fueled sex parties.
The documents, which The Daily Caller had obtained hours earlier from an anonymous source, also indicate that Carrie Levine, research director at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), was alerted on April 9, 2012 to Menendez’s habit of paying for sex while outside the United States.”

Employing illegal aliens, sleeping with underage prostitutes, interfering with the execution of justice by thwarting the work of immigration authorities: These crimes should cause Menendez to be recalled and arrested!  ASAP!

Reference 1: http://dailycaller.com/2012/12/12/feds-arrest-illegal-immigrant-sex-offender-working-as-intern-for-sen-menendez/#ixzz2J6LGlp4D


Reference 2  http://dailycaller.com/2013/01/25/emails-show-fbi-investigating-sen-bob-menendez-for-sleeping-with-underage-dominican-prostitutes/#ixzz2J6KY92Q5

Obama’s Tyranny Takes Well-Deserved, Long-Overdue, Hit from Courts!

By John W. Lillpop


In an important court ruling which may signal that Barack Obama’s insufferable acts of tyranny shall not go unchecked for another four dreary years, a federal appeals court has ruled that The One abused his powers when making Recess Appointments to the National Labor Relations Board.

Thus, the man who Obama himself and fellow Democrats revere as a Constitutional scholar is, after all is said and done, still subject to the rule of law and the US Constitution, and must heel to the principal of separation of powers just like any other mortal, non-deity figure.

As reported at the reference, this upbraiding of The One may (with any luck!) be a major impediment to the president’s plans to transform America from Democratic Republic into a dysfunctional dictatorship run at the behest of an in-over-his-head community organizer:

In a case freighted with major constitutional implications, a federal appeals court on Friday overturned President Obama’s controversial recess appointments from last year, ruling he abused his powers and acted when the Senate was not actually in a recess.

The three-judge panel’s ruling is a major blow to Mr. Obama. The judges ruled that the appointments he made to the National Labor Relations Board are illegal, and hence the five-person board did not have a quorum to operate.

But the ruling has even broader constitutional significance, with the judges arguing that the president’s recess appointment powers don’t apply to “intra-session” appointments — those made when Congress has left town for a few days or weeks. They said Mr. Obama erred when he said he could claim the power to determine when he could make appointments.
“Allowing the president to define the scope of his own appointments power would eviscerate the Constitution’s separation of powers,” the judges said in their opinion.

The judges said presidents’ recess powers only apply after Congress has adjourned a session permanently, which in modern times usually means only at the end of a year. If the ruling withstands Supreme Court scrutiny, it would dramatically constrain presidents in the future.

And the court ruled that the only vacancies that the president can use his powers on are ones that arise when the Senate is in one of those end-of-session breaks. That would all but eliminate the list of positions the president could fill with his recess powers.”

A glorious, if small, win for the soldiers of Democracy! Spread the word near and far:  Barack Obama is NOT a king nor is he above the law.

He must be challenged at every turn because it is painfully obvious that this man has far more concern for his own power and ego than he does for the Constitution and the American way!

Reference: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jan/25/federal-court-obama-broke-law-recess-appointments/#ixzz2J1qAqUpF

Obama Anti-rule of law Belligerence: ‘Narcissistic Fascism’ gone Amuck!

By John W. Lillpop


Barack Obama’s refusal to enforce existing laws with which he does not agree may provide him with a temporary sense of omnipotence, vital to the psyche of a not-well narcissist determined to remain above the rule of law, at least in his own tortured mind, at any cost.

Indeed, Obama’s abdication of responsibility to secure the US Borders, and political pandering to Hispanics when it comes to enforcing deportations of illegal aliens, are vivid examples of ‘narcissistic fascism’ gone amuck.

In truth, these are impeachable offenses which Congress should pursue, rather than wasting time on Immigration Reform (Amnesty) and other follies which promise only to further erode the rule of law in America and encourage another 20 million or so non-English speaking peasants to invade America from south of our so-called borders.

So far, Obama seems to be enjoying his anti-rule of law tangent, especially since his dictatorial tactics appear to have helped bring about his improbable re-election, despite a wretched economy, degradation of the American brand throughout the world, and the most incompetent, secretive administration in recent memory.

Whereas the political mantra used to be, “It’s the economy, stupid!”, with Obama the new admonition is, “It’s gifts and giveaways to the stupid, stupid!”

However, Obama’s savage plundering of the rule of law may come back to haunt this loosely-wrapped Marxist.

Specifically, Obama’s recent, “Say Farewell to Arms!” ploy may inspire those passionate about the 2nd Amendment and gun rights to follow Obama’s lead by simply ignoring laws which are inconvenient and intrusive.

As reported at the reference, there is a growing body of law enforcement authorities in the states who openly promise to defy Obama’s Unconstitutional assault and to even arrest federal authorities who try to impose Obama’s tyranny in their states:

“The federal authorities can try to enforce it,” said Alabama Sheriff Blake Dorning, opposing President Obama's proposed gun control laws. “I’m the Sheriff of Madison County. I took a constitutional oath to defend the Constitution of the United States of America, to defend the Constitution of the State of Alabama, even if it takes my life. That is my position.” 

In an expanding wave of opposition to President Obama's proposed gun laws, sheriffs across the country have stated publicly and in writing that they will not enforce any federal gun control legislation.”

So it is,  those who thrive by defying the law may also be smitten by that same defiance!






http://article.wn.com/view/2013/01/17/UPDATE_More_sheriffs_vow_not_to_enforce_new_federal_gun_cont/

Disgraced Slime Ball Charles Rangel Calls for “Over Coming” Southern Culture!

By John W. Lillpop

Not all that long ago, Charles Rangel (D-NY) was censored by members of the US House for failing to pay all his taxes, filing misleading financial statements, improperly seeking money from corporate interests for a college center bearing his name and setting up a campaign office in a subsidized, New York apartment designated for residential use. See Reference 1.

Not a pretty sight and not the sort of rap sheet that would qualify Rangel to offer unsolicited advise on ethics, culture, or decency to anyone..

In other words, Rangel would do well to keep his damn mouth and stupid opinions to his bloody self.

Unfortunately, the rotund leftist is not endowed with much intelligence, and furthermore is living in the Obama era of corruption where the rule of law is viewed as optional, provided one is a Democrat!

Rangel exposed his hypocrisy and bias against the US South with the idiotic statement recorded at reference 2:

CNSNews.com) - Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.), speaking on “MSNBC Live” on Jan. 16 said that “some of the southern areas have cultures that we have to overcome” when it comes to gun control.

Rangel was asked by anchor Thomas Roberts whether new gun control measures passed in New York State should serve as models for other states:

“If you’re proud of what New York has done, obviously there is not going to be any perfect policy or perfect law that everybody is going to agree on from both sides saying that this is key perfection but do you think that New York, and what has been done in this state, could be used as a role model for other states that would like to enact something of New York’s model?”

Rangel responded by saying: “Well I hope so. New York is a little different and more progressive in a lot of areas than some other states and some of the southern areas have cultures that we have to overcome.”  See Ref 2

Someone needs to inform this bloated mass of northern extremism that southern people generally live by a culture which causes people to pay their taxes, avoid improper money from corporate interests, and support the US Constitution, including the hallowed 2nd Amendment which is under assault by Marxists and zombies called Democrats!

In other words, Mr. Rangel, when it comes to culture and decent living, YOU are the last person who should be dishing out unsolicited advise, especially to people known for honesty, integrity,  and morality!

Shut up, Charles Rangel!


Ref 1: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/02/charles-rangel-censured-censure_n_791289.html

Ref 2: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/rep-charlie-rangel-guns-some-southern-areas-have-cultures-we-have-overcome

Barack Obama: Modern-day Abraham Lincoln?

By John W. Lillpop

Is Barack Obama really a 21st Century manifestation of Abraham Lincoln?  Some liberals, including Obama himself, are actively promoting that as a fundamental truth about The One, who has apparently evolved beyond simply being a Messiah.

And it is true, both men hail from Illinois!

However, other than that, there is precious little about Barack Obama that would conjure up even a remote  comparison to America’s 16th President!

Consider, please, the most fundamental difference between Honest Abe and The One:

Whereas, Abraham Lincoln authored and announced the Emancipation Proclamation and was instrumental in abolishing slavery, Barack Obama has sought, through ObamaCare and proliferation of existing Entitlement Programs, to create and expand a permanent “under class,” said class to be slavishly dependent on government for basic needs, and, thus, forever obligated to vesting unchecked power in the hands of tax and spend politicians who will deliver unearned goods, regardless of the impact on tax-paying, self-sufficient, and successful Americans.

There are literally hundreds of areas in which Messieurs  Lincoln and Obama differ. It would take volumes to examine those differences in detail.

However, in the limited space available here, it is necessary to limit this rendering to specific words and phrases that apply to Abe Lincoln, but NOT to Barack Obama.

A partial list of those words and phrases include:


Honest,

Humble,

Honorable,

Willing to take responsibility for his actions,

Compassionate,

Kind,

Merciful,

Encouraging,

Fair,

Unpretentious,

Wise, prudent,

Inquisitive,

Self-effacing,

Respectful,

Sincere,

Earnest,

Gentle,

Understanding,
Sympathetic,

Concerned for others,

Principled,

Generous,

Appreciative of others,

Patriotic,

Frugal, and

Courageous.

There are of course, hundreds, if not thousands, more words that accurately detail the differences between the great Abe Lincoln and the not-so-great Barack Obama.

In sum, it can be said that Abraham Lincoln was a good and great American!

Case closed! That says it all.

Five Ways to While Away the Hours on a Dreadful Inauguration Day!

By John W. Lillpop


As January 20, 2013 and the despicable doings of that fateful day descend over the heads of dedicated American patriots in mourning, kindred spirits must rally each other beyond despair and gloom and make ready the battle plans for yet another day!

Getting through the second inauguration of Barack Hussein Obama without losing one’s calm, cheerful disposition and without any breach of law more actionable than a profanity-laced tirade that would cause even the most grizzled Navy sailor to blush is a tall order, indeed, for those of us prone to taking our politics a smidgen too seriously.

Remember, patriots, Barack Obama is not smirking at you, personally, as he promises once again to defend and protect the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic; a promise he will deliberately break several times before even completing his God-awful, boring inaugural speech!

Be aware that Obama does not even know that you exist, especially if you are a white male, over 50, and a lifelong Republican who believes in the 2nd Amendment, the Declaration of Independence, traditional American values and who celebrates Independence Day with a world-class toot every July 4th.

Despite the fact that Obama is the least qualified, morally and ideologically, to ever step foot in the White House is irrelevant. He and his Marxist minions are here for at least another four years, so relax and enjoy the laughter—lest you collapse in tears.

Mind you, there are several defenses against the debilitating effects of living through the second Obama inauguration.

Any one of these can make this day survivable, if not bearable:


( ) Join the NRA and sign-up several leftist, anti-gun kooks with your dime. Foot the bill for their membership and you will feel all the better!

( ) Randomly hand out 100 “Happy Gun Appreciation Day” cards to strangers at the local mall.


( ) Take a NRA member to lunch AND dinner.


( ) Listen to Ronald Reagan’s two Inaugural Speeches from the glorious 1980s, and


( ) Thank God Barack has no sons to whom he can hand down his Marxist fascism!


Above all else, remember: Just like a 9.0 earthquake, killer storm, or other natural disaster: This (The Obama plague) TOO will pass!

Who Boasted that Al Qaeda Has Been 'Decimated', Mr. President?

By John W. Lillpop


During the trials and travails of the 2012 election, President Obama, with major help from the mainstream media, touted his accomplishments in foreign policy with a ridiculous claim that Al-Qaeda had been decimated during his watch.

Even after the September 11, 2012 murders of four American diplomats at Benghazi, Libya, Obama continued to deny and lie, as reported in the November 1 report at reference 1:

(CNSNews.com) – President Barack Obama has described al Qaeda as having been “decimated,” “on the path to defeat” or some other variation at least 32 times since the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, according to White House transcripts.

This comes despite Libyan President Mohamed Yousef El-Magarief, members of Congress, an administration spokesperson, and several press reports suggesting that al Qaeda played a role in the attack.

Recently, on Nov. 1 in Green Bay, Wis., Obama said,

“Thanks to sacrifice and service of our brave men and women in uniform, the war in Iraq is over, the war in Afghanistan is winding down, Al- Qaeda has been decimated, Osama bin Laden is dead.”

Reference 1: http://cnsnews.com/news/article/obama-touts-al-qaeda-s-demise-32-times-benghazi-attack-0

While Obama is still bobbing and weaving to obscure the truth regarding the Benghazi slaughter, Al-Qaeda continues to make headlines, including the recent attack in Algeria where at least one American life was lost to terrorists.

In response to this latest “leading from behind” failure, Obama interrupted his inaugural primping to issue the following statement, as reported at Reference 2:

"This attack is another reminder of the threat posed by al Qaeda and other violent extremist groups in North Africa," Obama said. "In the coming days, we will remain in close touch with the government of Algeria to gain a fuller understanding of what took place so that we can work together to prevent tragedies like this in the future."

Reference 2: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/01/19/us-sahara-crisis-obama-idUSBRE90I0KO20130119


Excuse me, Mr. President: Is the Al-Qaeda which you now describe as a terrorist threat have any affiliation whatsoever with the Al-Qaeda that you allegedly decimated?

Just asking!

DEMOCRAT Ray Nagin, Former New Orleans Mayor: Incompetent AND Apparent Fraud!

By John W. Lillpop

Ray Nagin, former Mayor of New Orleans whose personal incompetence and muddled- thinking caused more damage to the Big Easy than the 100+ mile per hour winds of Hurricane Katrina, has been indicted for, of all things, fraud!

Seems inconceivable that this DEMOCRAT victim of the George W. Bush onslaught against black folks during the 2005 Katrina crisis has somehow lost his way and got caught with his hands in the cookie jar.

Nontheless, as reported at the reference:

All three broadcast network evening newscasts on Friday night ran short items on the federal corruption indictments against the bumbling former Mayor of New Orleans, Ray Nagin, but skipped his party affiliation, a fact Reuters considered newsworthy – if not until their sixth paragraph: “Nagin, 56, and a Democrat...”

ABC anchor Diane Sawyer generously described Nagin as “the face of Hurricane Katrina...then the Mayor of New Orleans fighting for his city.”

Brian Williams of the NBC Nightly News lambasted Nagin with these harsh words:

Ray Nagin, who as Mayor of New Orleans gained notoriety for his erratic behavior during Hurricane Katrina when the city needed a steady hand, has been indicted by a federal grand jury on 21 counts of conspiracy, bribery, money laundering, tax fraud and filing false tax returns. It’s alleged Nagin took flat-out cash kickbacks from city contractors. He ran as a reformer. Even in the long history of corrupt government officials in New Orleans, this federal indictment is a first. Some time ago, Ray Nagin left New Orleans and moved to Dallas, Texas.

Once again, mainstream media refuses to be candid about the political affiliation of minority politicians.

Just to assure our independence and non-bias reporting, we repeat: Nagin is a bloody Democrat.

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/brent-baker/2013/01/18/abc-cbs-and-nbc-all-refuse-identify-indicted-nagin-democrat#ixzz2IRA4Z4T5

Gun Crime Not Nearly So Serious When Committed by Obama Administration?

By John W. Lillpop

President Obama and Eric Holder, US Attorney General and fellow gun slinger, are salivating with delight at the opportunity to make political hay at the expense of dead children and adults from the Sandy Hook massacre.

However, the anti-gun sentiment in the hearts of these die-hard liberals applies ONLY to weapons possessed and used by private American citizens and defended by the NRA.

When it comes to potential weapons crimes committed by the Obama administration itself, Obama and Holder are quick to look the other way and deny, obstruct, and deny still more.

As reported at the reference, the search for truth launched by Judicial Watch with regard to the administration’s reckless, deadly stunt known as Fast and Furious, is being fought by Obama-Holder every step of the way:



         Attorney General Eric Holder and his Department of Justice have asked a federal court  to                 indefinitely    delay a lawsuit brought by watchdog group Judicial Watch. The lawsuit seeks the enforcement   of open records requests relating to Operation Fast and Furious, as required by law.

Judicial Watch had filed, on June 22, 2012, a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request seeking all documents relating to Operation Fast and Furious and “specifically [a]ll records subject to the claim of executive privilege invoked by President Barack Obama on or about June 20, 2012.”

The administration has refused to comply with Judicial Watch’s FOIA request, and in mid-September the group filed a lawsuit challenging Holder’s denial. That lawsuit remains ongoing but within the past week President Barack Obama’s administration filed what’s called a “motion to stay” the suit. Such a motion is something that if granted would delay the lawsuit indefinitely.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said that Holder’s and Obama’s desire to continually hide these Fast and Furious documents is “ironic” now that they’re so gung-ho on gun control. “It is beyond ironic that the Obama administration has initiated an anti-gun violence push as it seeking to keep secret key documents about its very own Fast and Furious gun walking scandal,” Fitton said in a statement. “Getting beyond the Obama administration’s smokescreen, this lawsuit is about a very simple principle: the public’s right to know the full truth about an egregious political scandal that led to the death of at least one American and countless others in Mexico. The American people are sick and tired of the Obama administration trying to rewrite FOIA law to protect this president and his appointees. Americans want answers about Fast and Furious killings and lies.”

The only justification Holder uses to ask the court to indefinitely delay Judicial Watch’s suit is that there’s another lawsuit ongoing for the same documents – one filed by the U.S. House of Representatives. Judicial Watch has filed a brief opposing the DOJ’s motion to stay.

As the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform was voting Holder into contempt of Congress for his refusal to cooperate with congressional investigators by failing to turn over tens of thousands of pages of Fast and Furious documents, Obama asserted the executive privilege over them. The full House of Representatives soon after voted on a bipartisan basis to hold Holder in contempt.

There were two parts of the contempt resolution. Holder was, and still is, in both civil and criminal contempt of Congress. The criminal resolution was forwarded to the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ronald Machen–who works for Holder–for prosecution. Despite being technically required by law to bring forth criminal charges against Holder, under orders from Holder’s Department of Justice Machen chose to ignore the resolution.

The second part of the contempt resolution–civil contempt of Congress–allowed House Republicans to hire legal staff to challenge President Obama’s assertion of the executive privilege. That lawsuit remains ongoing despite Holder’s and the DOJ’s attempt to dismiss it and settle it.

It’s unclear what’s in the documents Obama asserted privilege over, but the president’s use of the extraordinary power appears weak. There are two types of presidential executive privilege: the presidential communications privilege and the deliberative process privilege. Use of the presidential communications privilege would require that the president himself or his senior-most advisers were involved in the discussions.

Since the president and his cabinet-level officials continually claim they had no knowledge of Operation Fast and Furious until early 2011 when the information became public–and Holder claims he didn’t read the briefing documents he was sent that outlined the scandal and how guns were walking while the operation was ongoing–Obama says he’s using the less powerful deliberative process privilege.

The reason why Obama’s assertion of that deliberative process privilege over these documents is weak at best is because the Supreme Court has held that such a privilege assertion is invalidated by even the suspicion of government wrongdoing. Obama, Holder, the Department of Justice, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and virtually everyone else involved in this scandal have admitted that government wrongdoing actually took place in Operation Fast and Furious.

In Fast and Furious, the ATF “walked” about 2,000 firearms into the hands of the Mexican drug cartels. That means through straw purchasers they allowed sales to happen and didn’t stop the guns from being trafficked even though they had the legal authority to do so and were fully capable of doing so.

Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and hundreds of Mexican citizens–estimates put it around at least 300–were killed with these firearms.”

Obama's undiluted message: Illegal Gun violence MUST be stopped—unless it involves the federal government itself. 

 So much for Obama’s “Save the Children” bleeding-heart canard!



http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/17/Holder-begs-court-to-indefinitely-delay-group-s-lawsuit-fighting-for-release-of-Obama-s-executive-privilege-Fast-and-Furious-documents

Obama's 23 Articles of Impeachment!

By John W. Lillpop



In an unprecedented display of sanctimonious hypocrisy smothered in unseemly arrogance, President Barack Obama slithered even lower in his revenge campaign to gut the 2nd Amendment and disarm the law-abiding citizenry of the United States.

Most appalling, at least to this conservative, was Obama’s swollen-ego admonition that members of Congress forsake the NRA in order to do the “right thing.”

The obvious implication being that those who cherish and defend the 2nd Amendment and the US Constitution are unwashed swine more concerned with raking in cash and votes from an evil constituency than defending young children from murderous assaults like the Newtown massacre.

He said, in part:

“---members of Congress should be more concerned about the safety of children heading off to school in the morning than about securing an A-rating from the NRA.” See reference.

One wonders if Obama has discussed this with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and other Democrats who belong to the NRA and oppose new laws meant as window-dressing only, but which will not work?

With no future elections to personally fret about, Obama has taken the courageous (?)step of challenging Democrats and Republicans alike to ‘cast their fate to the wind,’ by supporting Obama’s unconstitutional assault on gun rights.

Mind you, Obama has not always been so magnanimous and quick to put principle before politics.

For example, one of the most contentious issues with respect to health care reform was the need to contain costs, particularly outrageous costs added to the mix by greedy tort attorneys more concerned with personal cash flow than with meeting the health needs of the American public.

Clearly, with health care costs totally out of control, tort reform should have been a major emphasis of ObamaCare.

Yet, Obama and the Democrats refused to even consider it because of the massive political and economic support delivered to Democrats by greedy attorneys!

Once again, this president’s promise of “Hope and Change” has evolved into “more of the same” when it comes to corruption and integrity!

The president will probably fail in his attempt to destroy the 2nd Amendment. One can only hope and pray for such a result.

Obama should be forced to answer the following question with respect to his 23 Executive Orders which are, individually and collectively, candidates for Articles of Impeachment:

Would the Obama 23 have prevented, or delayed, the outrageous, illegal misuse of weapons by the Obama administration and delivery of same to Mexican drug cartels in the hideous scandal known as “Fast and Furious”?

Would the Obama 23 have prevented the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry who was slaughtered by illegal aliens armed with booty from the Fast and Furious outrage?

Or are the lives of older white males working to secure America from invasion irrelevant to our addled president?



http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/01/16/obama-presents-bold-gun-control-plan-as-nra-promises-fight-of-the-century/

Did Harry Reid Take $600,000 Bribe, AND, If So, Did He Pay Income Taxes?

By John W. Lillpop

Democrat Harry Reid (D-Utah), the man who disgraced the US Senate by using the floor of the Senate to accuse Mitt Romney of not paying income taxes, finds himself embroiled in a controversy involving bribery and perhaps other criminal activities.

As reported at the reference:

Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., denies taking a bribe from a Utah businessman who claims the Senate Majority Leader was to use his influence to deflect federal regulators from investigating the Utahn’s business.

Jeremy Johnson claims that he agreed to pay Reid $600,000 in 2010 to make a federal investigation go away. “The truth is the worst thing I think I’ve done was I paid money knowing it was going to influence Harry Reid,” Johnson told the Salt Lake Tribune. “So I’ve felt all along that I’ve committed bribery of some sort there.”

Reid denies the accusation. “Senator Reid has no knowledge or involvement regarding Mr. Johnson’s case,” Reid spokeswoman Kristen Orthman replied. “These unsubstantiated allegations implying Senator Reid’s involvement are nothing more than innuendo and simply not true.”

How sweet it is to see a lying weasel squirm to counter a serious felony issue!

The big question: Did Reid pay income taxes on the $600,000 bribe?









http://washingtonexaminer.com/harry-reid-i-did-not-take-a-bribe/article/2518507

Zero Dark Thirty: A Rare “Hooray for Hollywood” Movie?

By John W. Lillpop


It was with grave misgivings and trepidation that this conservative shelled out $10.00 to view “Zero Dark Thirty,” the recently-released flick about events leading to identification of Osama bin Laden’s hide away in Pakistan, culminating with the US Navy Seal raid which ended OBL’s very life and reign of terror, all in one magical evening in May of 2011.

My initial queasiness was rooted in concern (well founded, I believe) that the film would be a leftist hit piece designed to blame George W. Bush AND America for 9/11 and the war in Afghanistan, while bestowing undeserved credit on the naïve head of Barack Obama for bin Laden’s long overdue demise.

Surprise and delight rendered my cynicism null and void inasmuch as:

1. Water boarding and other harsh interrogation methods employed by the Bush administration were shown as tools which provided the intelligence that ultimately enabled the CIA and US military to vanquish the mass murderer, and which saved American lives;

2. The words ‘Barack Obama’ were not uttered in the film. Rather all references to the Commander-in-Chief were to “The president.” Likewise there were no gaudy depictions of Obama spiking the football or otherwise reaping political hay off the valor and courage of our brave Navy Seals;

3. The notion that “Good Men With Guns” can vanquish “bad men” was reinforced, as was the notion, that in and of themselves, guns are not inherently evil.


A ‘Teaching Moment’ looms for the film industry: Omit the Leftist propaganda and anti-American demonizing of Republicans and the Constitution and, behold!, a “Hooray for Hollywood” film may just be possible!


Zero Dark Thirty: A Don’t Miss! flick!

Celebrating Obama’s 2nd Inaugural? Don't Be Silly!

By John W. Lillpop



Gloom, despair, and excessive misery will dominate the moods and emotions of patriotic Americans on January 20, 2013, while Marxists, heathen, and all manner of entitlement addicts joyfully celebrate the inexplicable reelection of Barack Obama to the US Presidency.

Lavish Inaugural Balls will be held in Washington, D.C., New York City, Chicago, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and other leftist escapes where concepts such as patriotism, personal responsibility, fiscal prudence, religious faith, and electoral integrity are held in contempt as “old school,” and intolerably racist.

Internationally, the demise of American Exceptionalism will be toasted at Inaugural Balls in Beijing, Carcass, Moscow, Mexico City, Tehran, Havana and other anti-American venues where Obama will be celebrated as a great innovator who brought down the greatest society in human history by promising to redistribute wealth from the successful and enterprising to the slovenly and utterly dependent.

Joy will be absent for those who love America, our culture and traditions, and the liberty and freedoms which make this nation so special.

Where to find Festive Inaugural Balls? Anywhere where America is no longer held in high esteem!

January 20, 2013: Bound to be a very sad day in America!

Inconvenient Truth: Obama ‘Skirting’ Issue of Diversity!

By John W. Lillpop


Remember when the liberal media sought to destroy Presidential candidate Mitt Romney for referring to “Binders of women” during the 2012 election? When, in fact, Romney had a sterling record of including women in his gubernatorial administration?

And remember how the media crafted a false “War on Women” narrative to discredit the Republican party for opposing tax-payer funded abortions and contraception?

Remember Sandra Fluke who spoke at the DNC in Charlotte to voice her indignation at being forced to “go it alone” in the funding of her sexual activities while in College?

Well now that the election has been settled (stolen!), the fellow who won the damn thing with overwhelming support from gullible women has decided to wage his own war on women by denying equal representation for females in the Obama cabinet.

Obama’s anti-skirting policy has gotten so outrageous that even left-wing dupes are taking notice and speaking out.

As reported at the reference, the less- than- honorable Charles Rangel (D-NY) issued a withering rejoinder about Obama’s anti-women chicanery:
"It's embarrassing as hell. You have to do these things because it's the right thing to do as a symbol of what America stands for."


Perhaps The One should borrow Nancy Pelosi’s photo shop software and simply create a more diverse cabinet on paper?  After all, photo shop appointments need not go through Senate confirmation and are less costly in these budget –strained times.

Why not make Pelosi your “Diversity by Technology” czar, Mr. President?  She is female you know!



http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/obama-hit-for-lack-of-diversity-in-reshuffled-cabinet/

Will Tough New Gun Laws Prevent Obama from ‘Taking Guns to Knife Fight?’

By John W. Lillpop

As Barack Obama and liberals celebrate the  Sandy Hook school massacre as a golden opportunity to rescind the 2nd Amendment and disarm Republicans, one must wonder how The One really feels about the use of weapons in order to level the playing field when it comes to political wars?

After all, as reported at the Reference, as recently as 2011 Obama seemed keen to the notion of using guns in order to prevail over knife-wielding Republicans:

Obama said,  "If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun," "Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl.”

Liberals will argue that Obama was only speaking metaphorically to make a point.  Still, Obama's smoldering   hatred and obsession with revenge should concern anyone who values the 2nd Amendment and the US Constitution.

Remember, too, that the Obama administration shipped deadly weapons to Mexico as part of the dim-witted Fast and Furious scandal which cost US Border Control agent Brian Terry his life AND resulted in the deaths of a number of innocent Mexican citizens as well.

Recall also that the Fast and Furious illegalities were, and continue to be, covered up by Obama’s tyrannical use of Executive Privilege to keep Congress from learning the truth.

Clearly, Obama’s words and actions do not reflect a responsible or mature attitude toward the rule of law or the protection of innocent people against government abuse!

Why should the American people accept the trashing of a Constitutional freedom by an administration that has shown that it is more than willing to play deadly political games with weapons, and to misuse Executive Privilege to obscure the facts?


http://nation.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01/10/obama-flashback-if-they-bring-knife-fight-we-bring-gun

Mitch McConnell’s ‘No New Taxes’ Pledge: Breath of Fresh Air, or More Hot Air?

By John W. Lillpop

American stalwarts in the war against reckless spending funded by tyrannical tax policies must not forget that in 1988 Presidential candidate George H.W. Bush won election based largely on the now infamous line he delivered at the Republican convention.

His “Read My Lips—No New Taxes” throwing down of the fiscal gauntlet led to his victory that year.

Unfortunately, Bush-41 reneged on that promise, which led to his unsuccessful reelection bid in 1992. Bush’s defeat left America with a perjurer and obstructer of justice in the Oval Office; a nasty scenario made all of the worse when President Bill Clinton converted the Oval Office into a pleasure palace for sexual dalliances with consenting, and non-consenting, women alike.
Twenty years later, America is still burdened with the excesses of tax and spend liberals, AND with weak-kneed Republicans who promise to save America from the sort of financial anarchy that is destroying Greece and other socialist states in Europe.

In 2010, the American people voted for fiscal austerity by kicking Nancy Pelosi and her spending disorder out of the US House, and by installing a contingent of Tea Party patriots who were committed to cutting taxes, spending, and the burgeoning growth of government under Marxist Barack Obama.

Alas, two years later, Congress has agreed to increase taxes and spending AGAIN, notwithstanding the results of the 2010 elections.

And now, as predictable as hot weather in July, Americans are being serenaded by Mitch McConnell, Minority leader of the US Senate with a firm, no nonsense rant declaring that new taxes are “off the table.”

As reported at reference 1, McConnell sounds mad as hell:

With looming deadlines on the nation’s federal borrowing limit and delayed across-the-board budget cuts, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Sunday that discussions about new taxes are off the table in upcoming fiscal debate, and that reining in government spending must be the focal point.

“Are you saying that any discussion of revenue is completely off the table going forward? You will not accept any new revenues in any new deal?” asked ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos on his program, “This Week.”
“Yeah, absolutely,” McConnell said. “ The tax issue is behind us. Now, the question is what are we going to do about the real problem. … Now it’s time to pivot and turn to the real issue, which is our spending addiction.”

Now where in the heck have we heard that before, Mitch?

Are you serious this time? Do you pledge to keep your word and not slither behind closed doors to make some under- the -table deal with Veep Joe Biden?

Incidentally, America’s fiscal woes are compounded by the fact that Barack Obama does not believe America has a spending problem, and Joe Biden thinks paying higher taxes is the patriotic thing to do!

Excuse the skepticism, but with the Obama-Biden team running the Executive Branch and with John Boehner and Mitch McConnell leading Congressional opposition, there is scant little hope for our beloved America!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/01/06/mitch-mcconnell-the-tax-issue-is-behind-us/

Obama’s “Fairness” Canard

By John W. Lillpop



When objective, reasoned thought will not support one of his radical Marxist schemes, Barack Obama is not the least bit hesitant about reaching deep into his bag of dirty tricks to retrieve an appropriate subterfuge that will divide Americans and advance his agenda.

In the 2012 election, Obama played the “class warfare card” masterfully, using “wealth profiling” to portray Republicans as the party which represents the rich and powerful, maggots who seek to enrich themselves at the expense of the vanquished working poor and their children.

According to Barack, it’s all about “fairness,” the progressive definition of which is “You have more than me, and so the only fair thing to do is to have government take from you and give to me!”

Ability, effort, resolve, and determination notwithstanding, fairness demands that the government discriminate against the successful and prosperous in favor of the less talented, less driven, and less creative.

Absent from this sanctimonious double talk is any discussion of why folks who already pay a huge percentage of the total taxes collected by the government should be forced to pay even more, simply because they have it.

Where is the fairness in that, Mr. President?

Conversely, why do those who benefit the most from government welfare programs pay little or no taxes?

Fairness, indeed!

Obama’s latest Marxist ploy involves the heady subject of immigration reform, which Obama and the left promotes as a basic question of --fairness.

According to Obama, 20 million or so illegal aliens who have invaded America in defiance of our borders and immigration laws deserve amnesty and should be allowed to join society as though they had been subjected to the rigorous financial, criminal, and medical background checks which legal immigrants are required to pass.

Where is the fairness for millions of would-be immigrants who are forced to wait their turn in line, rather than stealing their way in?

Why are those who abide by the law and play by the rules rejected in favor of those who break and enter?

Fairness? Phooey!

Mexico, Mecca for Violent Drug Cartels, Declares War on Toy Guns!

By John W. Lillpop


More than 30 thousand Mexicans have been murdered over the past three years by the drug cartels who really run this corrupt failed state!

So it stands to reason that Mexican officials would destroy thousands of “Toy” guns in their campaign against gun violence!

It’s the same sort of nonsensical illogic that caused President Obama to tackle the federal debt by signing a bill which increases the debt!

Mexico’s gun insanity is as reported at the reference:

MEXICO (AP) -- Mexico City authorities say they have destroyed thousands of toy guns in an effort to fight real crimes committed with fake weapons.

Mayor Miguel Angel Mancera said Friday that officials believe that at least three of every 10 violent crimes in Mexico City is committed with a realistic toy gun.

The guns were confiscated from shops in Mexico City and the surrounding state of Mexico. Mexico bans virtually all civilian gun ownership and requires that toy weapons be made of transparent or brightly colored plastic. Sunday is Three Kings Day, when Mexican children receive the largest number of holiday gifts.

Official statistics show that there were 82,117 robberies and 1,349 homicides in Mexico City in the first 11 months of 2012.”

1,349 homicides in 11 months and da mayor is worried about toy guns?

Mucho loco, senor!


http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/L/LT_MEXICO_TOY_GUNS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&CTIME=2013-01-04-18-15-1

Obama Pitches $4 Trillion Deficit Increase As Reduction!

By John W. Lillpop


Thought the exaggerations, misleading statements, and outright lies from the 2012 presidential campaign were put in moth balls until 2016, did you?

Silly, you!

Remember, patriots, we are dealing with Barack Obama, the quintessential liar in American politics and the only president in US history to be addicted to campaign lying even when an election is not nigh.

A classic example of Obama truth-aversion was rolled out on January 2 when Obama hurriedly issued a Victory Message to celebrate passage of the fiscal cliff bill.


Before leaving for Oahu, the president released the following high-five video to celebrate his genius and devotion to the little guy:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=9tuztHPq95o



Remember, your president actually stated, We stopped that middle class tax hike. But we didn’t stop there. …Last year we started reducing the deficit through $1 trillion in spending cuts. And the agreement we reached this week will reduce the deficit even more by asking the wealthiest two percent of Americans to pay higher taxes for the first time in two decades.”

Unfortunately for those already working on the Obama Library, the Congressional Budget Office had quite a different take on the matter: CBO, in fact, stated that the bill would add nearly $4 trillion to the deficit over 10 years.

As reported at the reference:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Congressional Budget Office on Tuesday said Senate-passed legislation to avert the "fiscal cliff" would add nearly $4 trillion to federal deficits over a decade, largely because it would extend low tax rates for almost all Americans.

The congressional scorekeeper's analysis was released as a number of Republicans in the House of Representatives voiced opposition to the bill, and considered amending it with deeper spending cuts.”

Get that? The bill that Obama is so fond of will INCREASE the deficit by 4T!

 With the national debt at $16.4 trillion, the president is spinning a 4T increase as a reduction and is even gloating about his cleverness in doing so!




http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/president-obamas-paradoxical-presentation-on-the-fiscal-cliff-deal/2013/01/02/9ea86bee-5534-11e2-8b9e-dd8773594efc_blog.html

Does Complicity in Passage of Fiscal Cliff Bill Really Shield Republicans from Blame?

By John W. Lillpop


In 2010, the American people sent a message, loud and clear, to Democrats and Barack Obama: Stop out of control spending!
Even so, the Tea Party and other conservative influences were unable to prevent Barack Obama and the Democrats from sabotaging the process that was supposed to address the $16.4 trillion deficit and the uncontrolled spending that threatens to sink the republic.

Astoundingly, Republicans in Congress countenanced a bill that will actually increase the deficit by $4 trillion dollars over the next 10 years.

It is true that the Democrats are mostly to blame for the financial train wreck that is ruining America. Barack Obama and his allied liberals have never genuinely intended to cut spending one iota, except in the area of national defense which most liberals abhor.

Still, John Boehner and Mitch McConnell, Republican leaders in the House and Senate respectively, have let conservatives and the nation down by agreeing to the tax and spend mania practiced by Obama and the Democrats.

Boehner and McConnell were reportedly afraid of being blamed for allowing the nation to go off the fiscal cliff. So they copped out and were complicit in an idiotic farce that will increase the deficit even more.

However, Boehner and McConnell are sadly mistaken if they presume to have escaped the wrath of the American people.

Indeed, future wrath is already building and will most certainly include anger at Republicans who aided and abetted Barack Obama in this latest dereliction of fiduciary responsibility.

The reckless and irresponsible fiscal mismanagement of America cannot, and will not, last forever. The day of reckoning will come, and, unfortunately, Republicans will be held as complicit in the financial devastation of what used to be the greatest society in human history!