Illegals Say, ‘Adios,’ Alabama Citizens Say, ‘Gracias’!

By John W. Lillpop


The great state of Alabama appears to have found the answer to ridding the state of costly and dangerous foreign invaders.

As it turns out, the answer is amazingly simple.

To begin with, Alabama does not grant driver’s licenses to people in the state illegally, nor are illegal aliens able to secure in-state tuition breaks.

In other words, the state does not go out of its way to lure even more invaders into the state.

Further, Alabama does damn little to encourage the illegals already there to stay.

In fact, Alabama’s new anti-illegal immigration law, upheld (for the most part) by a federal judge this week, is causing illegals to get the hell out of the state, again proving that enforcing the rule of law will work, given the chance.

As reported at the reference, in part:

Education officials say scores of immigrant families have withdrawn their children from classes or kept them home this week, afraid that sending the kids to school would draw attention from authorities.

There are no precise statewide numbers. But several districts with large immigrant enrollments — from small towns to large urban districts — reported a sudden exodus of children of Hispanic parents, some of whom told officials they planned to leave the state to avoid trouble with the law, which requires schools to check students' immigration status.

Bleeding heart liberals will wring their hands in despair about the poor immigrants being discriminated against and driven away.

However, the fact is that illegal aliens are on the same moral plane as bank robbers. Illegals steal education, health care, and other public services to which they are not entitled. They have no legal or moral basis for being in Alabama or anywhere else on US soil.

Kudos to Alabama for defending its citizenry from invasions by non-English speaking foreigners.

Let the results in Alabama serve notice to other states struggling with invaders: Tough enforcement actions will cause large numbers of illegals to self-deport, and that is a good thing!



http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1660186/pg1

In Defense of Barack Obama—Sort of

By John W. Lillpop


Barack Obama is NOT completely at fault for everything bad that has happened over the past three years.

REPEAT: Barack Obama is not at fault for all bad things over the past three years.

For example, he probably had little or nothing to do with the magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami that devastated Japan in March.

Hurricane Irene would most likely have pummeled the east coast even if John McCain and Sarah Palin had prevailed in 2008.

The Boston Red Sox would have recorded the most depressing collapse in sports history even if the White House were not occupied by an arrogant snot and unashamed Marxist.

Anthony Weiner would have taken pictures of his sorry private parts, and sent said photos to an undeserving world via Twitter even if Barack was still in organized crime (under the guise of community organizer) on the streets of Chicago.


There must be hundreds of other examples of awful things for which The One cannot be held liable. I can’t think of any others at the moment, but they are surely out there.

For everything else, it is perfectly appropriate (and even fun!) to blame Obama!

Except for the fact that it is not just Obama.

The same type of mind-numbing arrogance and shortsightedness that has hold on Obama also has its clutches around the minds of Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Dick Durbin, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, Barbara Boxer, Barney Frank, and countless other progressives from coast-to-coast.

In fact, I would risk my lifetime membership in the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy of America by stating that Obama is not the major problem in America today.

In fact, it is the ideological snake pit of liberalism that is responsible for every ill in the world.

Obama is but symptom of a calamitous dumbing down of the species.

Which is not to say that Obama does not have to go. He does, but even with this misfit out of the picture, there is one hell of a lot of work that we conservatives will have left to do if there is any hope for saving America.

‘John and Ken’ Talk Show from LA Riles Illegal Aliens & Their Supporters!

By John W. Lillpop

In a state where illegal aliens are routinely feted and rewarded because of their potential as future Democrats, there is a refreshing blast of fresh air emanating from the studios of KFI in Los Angeles every afternoon.

Its called the John and Ken show for co-hosts John Kobylt Ken Chiampou, fellows who have become icons to those who respect American sovereignty, the rule of law, and American language and culture.

As expected, these two warriors of truth and advocates of unabashed Americanism find themselves in the cross-hairs of illegal aliens and the nut balls who support illegal invasions of America.

As reported at the slightly edited version of the reference, John and Ken are up to their eyes in controversy yet again:

The 'John and Ken' show is one of the most popular programs on one of the most popular radio stations in the region, and listeners seem to relish the hosts' anger and sense of outrage. While Illegal immigration has long been a particular focus of the show, it's only one of several favorite targets — the hosts have railed against taxes, labor unions and other pet causes for years with equally incendiary rhetoric.

The duo regularly uses cutting language to talk about legislators and often ask listeners to call the public phone lines of politicians who disagree with them.

Long-time immigrant rights activist Jorge-Mario Cabrera is used to being called to task for his views. But when radio hosts Kobylt and Chiampou recently gave out his cellphone number on the air in a campaign against the California Dream Act, he found himself unprepared for the barrage of hate-filled phone calls that followed.

Cabrera's numbers were read on air Sept. 1 during a campaign to defeat what the hosts call the "Illegal Alien California Dream Act," a reference to recently approved legislation that would extend state financial aid to college students who are in the U.S. illegally. Gov. Jerry Brown must still sign the bill before it becomes law.

John and Ken urged listeners to call Cabrera, saying he was planning a celebration "on the theft of tax money for illegal aliens." The phone calls started coming and, weeks later, still haven't completely stopped, Cabrera said. One man has called 32 times. Some calls were benign, like one woman who spoke in Spanish and said Cabrera's organization should work to benefit people who are in the country legally.

Last week, the leaders of a dozen groups sent a letter to the station's market manager, program director and to Clear Channel Communications, which owns the station, asking for a meeting and demanding the John and Ken program be removed from the air.

"For years John and Ken have terrorized Los Angeles' Latino, Asian American and African American communities, creating an atmosphere of hate and intolerance and legitimizing violence and discrimination," the letter said. "There is every reason to believe it is John and Ken's intent to incite these verbal assaults and threats."

"We are not against anyone being against our philosophy," he said. "But when they get to the level of acting like thugs with a microphone, then that's the problem."

Hmm.

"We are not against anyone being against our philosophy"?


What they seem to be saying is, 'as long as the message against our philosophy is not communicated in a logical fashion to large numbers of people."

Phooey!

If Cabrera is so sensitive and opposed to free speech, perhaps he should not make his cell phone number so available to folks like John and Ken?

May God Bless and keep John and Ken!



http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-adv-john-and-ken-20110930,0,6290281.story

Suspend 2012 Elections? Hell No, Here Is a Better Way!

Satire by John W. Lillpop


Governor Perdue’s proposal to suspend the 2012 elections so that candidates could spend more time fixing the problems, instead of campaigning, was rightfully laughed into oblivion by serious observers.

However, the dizzy blond from North Carolina hit the nail on the head in one respect: America’s pressing problems will be ignored for the next 14 months so that incumbent politicians can exaggerate, fabricate, pontificate, and LIE about their dismal records which have damn near destroyed America.

Rather than suspending the elections, why not move them up to November 1, 2011?

Six weeks is too little time you say?

Perhaps, but if you eliminate time and money wasted on fund raising, attack ads packed with lies, and all the miscellany associated with hoodwinking voters to repeat the travesty of 2008, and just hold the damn elections we might be able to save our democratic republic.

After all, the damage to our economy, the rule of law, and our international image has already been done. Nothing is going to change the fact that Barack Obama has ruined what was once a first-class nation.

From downgrading of the US credit rating, to the manner by which foreign affairs are mishandled, the verdict is clear: Obama and his Marxist pals must go—NOW!

What about the nomination process for the GOP and all the simple-minded debates still to come?

Trash them all and let Mitt Romney and Herman Cain be the standard bearers.

With Obama’s current poll numbers, the election would not even be close, so the obligatory feeding at the public trough by appeal lawyers could be avoided.

What about the Constitution and all of that?

America is in crisis because close to 70 million nincompoops installed a moon bat who is totally without qualifications.

Move the election up and fix the mess created by “We the People.”

Digital Signature Technology Allows Americans to Send Unemployment Sympathy Card to Obama!

By John W. Lillpop


Whatever will they think of next?

Ultra-sensitive capitalists at Hallmark are selling “Unemployment Sympathy” cards for those who have been victimized by the downsizing ax.

As reported at the reference, in part:

With layoffs continuing across the country and the national unemployment rate hovering over 9 percent, Hallmark has designed a line of unique sympathy cards to help well-wishers commiserate with the recently pink-slipped, according to a CNN report.

The cards themselves feature messages ranging from the sentimental to the snarky. One reads: “Don’t think of it as losing a job. Think of it as a time-out between stupid bosses.”

There is even a move afoot by conservatives, none affiliated with Hallmark, to use Digital Signature technology that will enable 80 million or so voters to send President Obama a “Dear Barack” card in November of 2012.

The text in the Sympathy Card would read something like this:


November 6, 2012
Around 9pm EST

Dear Barack:

As you surely know by now, the American people have overwhelmingly elected not to extent your contract for another four years.

Please accept our condolences for what we know must be a very painful loss.

Although 80 million of us voted for your opponent, you should hold your head high in honor of the millions of illegal aliens and sleeper cell activists who voted with you to the very end.

Best wishes in your journey to find meaningful employment.

Now that you are out of the picture and ObamaCare has been rejected by the SCOTUS, business owners will surely rush to hire as many employees as possible.

That should make it easier for the hard-core unemployed, including yourself.

We recommend that you keep you chin up and look for a suitable position in a community organizer position.

We understand that Chicago Mayor Emanuel is hiring, for a hefty fee of course. When dealing with da mayor, be careful of hidden microphones and video recorders disguised as cell phone.

Thanks for four years of hysterical laughs,

The America People


http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/28/job-loss-sympathy-cards-soften-the-blow-of-unemployment/#ixzz1ZO8J2TZG

Should Chris Christie Run?

Satire by John W. Lillpop

Even though New Jersey Governor has slammed the door shut (several times)with regard to being a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, die-hard supporters persist.

As reported at the reference, George Pataki chimed in with his two cents:

Former Gov. George Pataki took the unusual step today of publicly calling for New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie to jump into the race for president.

Pataki released a statement this morning through his No American Debt group, saying that none of the current presidential candidates have “leveled” with voters on the problems the country faces.
“America is in a crisis, and none of the current candidates or the President has leveled with American public about what needs to be done to rescue our future. This country needs a straight shooter and a proven leader. I urge Governor Chris Christie to run for President to fill the void and lead America forward.


Thus the question, “Should Christie Run?” is once again dominating headlines.

However, anyone who believes that Christie would be able to “run” for anything except a chocolate milkshake needs to take a second look!

The man is huge. Size XXXXXXXXXXXX!

What a shame it would be to elect a man who, because of his weight, can barely walk, especially now that Michelle Obama has declared war on obesity on behalf of the American people.

Should Christie run? Only with a release from a licensed cardiologist and only if accompanied by a team of emergency medical specialists!



http://www.capitaltonight.com/2011/09/pataki-urges-christie-to-run-for-president/

America’s Pastime: Joy in St. Louis & Tampa; Suicide Risk in Atlanta & Boston

By John W. Lillpop

American baseball games are played for keeps beginning in April and continue through September each year.

After six grueling months of damn-near daily games (each team plays 162), eight teams, four from the American League and four from the National League, are allowed to play on into the month of October.

Finally, as the “post-season” progresses all but two teams, one from each league, advance to the Fall Classic, more modestly referred to as the World Series.

Eventually, one team emerges as World Series champion sometime in November.

On this particular morning, the combatants in the Post-season are known and include New York, Detroit, Tampa, and Texas in the American league and Arizona, Milwaukee, St. Louis, and Philadelphia in the National.

Thus begins the ‘torture run’ to glory for the ball players and their ardent fans in these cities.

The end of the regular season yesterday was anything but regular. The Atlanta Braves and Boston Red Sox clubs both went into September with huge leads in their quest for “Wild Card” slots. Both seemed all but certain to qualify for the post-season.

But this is baseball, where the bizarre, unexpected, and crazy is always possible.

For Atlanta and Boston fans, the “torture” ended with their teams left in lurch, forced to wait until next year!

The amazing thing about baseball is that after all those months and games, fans retain the ability to go into hysterical joy or suicidal despair, based on the doings of millionaire athletes playing a kid’s game.

Why should Atlanta fans be so upset about the collapse of the spoiled millionaires who play ball for their town, but whom rarely live in said town or have any emotional connection thereto, save the millions of dollars that flow into their greedy palms?

Likewise for Boston. What the hell difference does it really make that the team fell out of the playoffs by losing to the lowly Baltimore Orioles?

So big deal that the hated New York Yankees collapsed in the last two innings of its game against Tampa Bay! Who the hell would believe that the Yankees would deliberately go belly-up against Tampa simply to knock Boston out of the post-season?

But it DOES matter, in a huge way to the fans! Which is why unbridled joy will happen in St. Louis and Tampa, while the die-hard blokes in Atlanta and Boston are on suicide watch for the next day or so!

Thousands of Missiles Go Missing in Libya: Where Is Obama?

By John W. Lillpop


With his customary modesty, President Obama has attempted to sell the American people on the ‘success’ of his leading from behind strategy in the ‘non-hostilities’ waged in Libya.

This braggadocio is issued despite the fact that, as of this date, Moammar Gadhafi is still on the loose when he should have been taken care of ‘within days, not weeks.’

Even more disconcerting is the fact that 20,000 or so surface-to-air missiles have gone missing as reported, in part, at the reference:

A recent secret White House meeting revealed that an estimated 20,000 portable, heat-seeking missiles appear to have vanished from an Army warehouse in Libya, ABCNews.com reported.

The new revelations stoke ongoing fears that such weapons, which are light, relatively easy to use and have the capacity to take down a commercial airplane, could end up in the wrong hands as the Libyan war that ousted Muammar Qaddafi winds down.

“Matching up a terrorist with a shoulder-fired missile, that's our worst nightmare,” Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., told ABCNews.com.

Earlier this month, a senior U.S. official told the Associated Press that weapon proliferation was the “key concern” for the U.S. as Libya emerges from six months of civil war. To be sure, Libya has been struggling to secure many weapon caches.

The U.S. has individuals working with Libya’s new rulers to help stanch the possible proliferation of a wide range of weaponry. Jeffery Feltman warned reporters of the potential proliferation of shoulder-fired missiles and mustard gas.

"This is certainly an issue we are concerned with, the Libyan officials are concerned with, because it poses potential risks not only to Libyans, but to the region as a whole," said Feltman earlier this month.”

Perhaps a little more intelligent involvement rather than goofy “leading from behind” would be advised, Mr. President?



http://www.foxnews.com/world/2011/09/27/report-20000-heat-seeking-missiles-may-be-missing-from-libyan-warehouse/#ixzz1ZLAt1uIc

Common Sense Wins in Alabama: Most Sections of Immigration Law Upheld!

By John W. Lillpop


Great news from Birmingham. As reported at the reference:

BIRMINGHAM, Alabama -- A Birmingham federal judge today upheld most sections of Alabama's tough new immigration law. U.S. District Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn ruled on a U.S. Department of Justice lawsuit seeking to block the law. Blackburn upheld a provision of the state law related to police stops and detentions of people suspected of being in the country illegally. She also upheld sections requiring schools to check the citizenship status of children and sections that would nullify contracts knowingly entered into with unauthorized aliens.

This ruling should spur other states suffering from the burdens of illegal aliens to take similar steps.

Hooray!




http://lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=641959

Herman Cain: An Exceptional American of African Descent

By John W. Lillpop


Herman Cain brings extraordinary credentials to his candidacy for U.S. President.

As documented at the reference:

He graduated from Morehouse College in 1967 with a Bachelor of Arts degree in mathematics and received a Master of Science degree in computer science from Purdue University in 1971, while he was also working full-time in ballistics for the U.S. Department of the Navy. Cain has authored four books: Leadership is Common Sense (1997), Speak as a Leader (1999), CEO of SELF (October 2001), and They Think You're Stupid (May 2005). He also authored an article titled "The Intangibles of Implementation" in the technical journal Interfaces (Vol. 9, No. 5, 1979, pp. 144-147), published by the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences

After completing his master's degree from Purdue, Cain left the Department of the Navy and began working for The Coca-Cola Company as a business analyst. In 1977, he joined Pillsbury where he rose to the position of Vice President by the early 1980s. He left his executive post to work for Burger King – a Pillsbury subsidiary at the time – managing 400 stores in the Philadelphia area. Under Cain's leadership, his region went from the least profitable for Burger King to the most profitable in three years. This prompted Pillsbury to appoint him President and CEO of Godfather's Pizza, another of their then-subsidiaries. Within 14 months, Cain had taken Godfather's Pizza from 911 stores down to 420 stores and reduced costs significantly. As a result of his efforts Godfather's Pizza finally became profitable. In a leveraged buyout in 1988, Cain, Executive Vice-President and COO Ronald B. Gartlan and a group of investors bought Godfather's from Pillsbury. Cain continued as CEO until 1996, when he was asked to resign by the board. Later that year he became CEO of the National Restaurant Association – a trade group and lobby organization for the restaurant industry – where he had previously been chairman concurrently with his role at Godfather's.

Cain became a member of the board of directors to the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in 1992 and served as its chairman from January 1995 to August 1996, when he resigned to become active in national politics. Cain was a 1996 recipient of the Horatio Alger Award.

Cain was on the board of directors of Aquila, Inc. from 1992 to 2008, and also served as a board member for Nabisco, Whirlpool, Reader's Digest, and AGCO, Inc.

Wow! This is a man who is running for office based on his abilities, eduction, and proven record of accomplishment.

Look at his background in economics!

Oh, did I mention that this American patriot just happens to
be black? An American of African descent as it were.

Because of his education AND practical experience, Mr. Cain has far more going for him than the color of his skin.

This is no intellectual elitist who speaks in ‘professorial’ baby talk which sounds terrific, but which completely lacks substance.

Herman Cain does not ‘talk down’ to people, nor does he woo voters with flowery promises of ‘Hope and Change,’ and other leftist campaign pap.

Herman Cain would never use the federal government to bankrupt American industry.

Herman Cain understands private enterprise. He HAS met payrolls and successfully managed multiple businesses.

Herman Cain would NEVER burden American taxpayers with a trillion-dollar stimulus plan.

Herman Cain would never promote job-killing regulations and higher taxes.

Herman Cain was a key player in defeating socialized medicine during the Clinton presidency.

Herman Cain would not make the closure of GITMO a major, or even minor, priority of his administration.

Herman Cain would never insist that terrorists caught on the battlefield be read their Miranda Rights and tried in civilian courts.

Herman Cain understands and respects the U.S. military.

Herman Cain is an American citizen and owns no baggage which challenges his eligiblity to serve as President.

Herman Cain MUST be on the Republican presidential ticket in 2012!

Herman Cain: Let's CHANGE America back to the great nation which we can be.








http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herman_Cain

Is It Really ‘Racist’ to Quote Obama, Verbatim?

By John W. Lillpop

Some stories are just too silly to take seriously.

That would include the story titled, Was the Associated Press transcription of Obama’s CBC speech ‘racist’? at the reference.

The story, in part:

By most accounts, President Obama gave a fiery speech at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation's annual awards dinner in Washington, D.C., on Saturday, telling blacks to "quit crying and complaining" and support him in the fight for jobs, according to the Associated Press. But was the AP transcription of Obama's remarks racist?

That's the subject currently being debated after the issue was raised on Chris Hayes' MSNBC show on Sunday.

On MSNBC, the African-American author Karen Hunter complained the news service transcribed Obama's speech without cleaning it up as other outlets did--specifically including the "dropped g's."

Via the AP version:

"Take off your bedroom slippers. Put on your marching shoes," he said, his voice rising as applause and cheers mounted. "Shake it off. Stop complainin'. Stop grumblin'. Stop cryin'. We are going to press on. We have work to do."

How in the hell can any sane person allege racism on the part of AP when they simply repeated the President’s words, exactly?

What about people in the audience who applauded and cheered Obama’s “fiery” rhetoric: Are they racist as well?

Then we have the inimitable Maxine Waters, and thank the Lord she cannot be cloned!

As reported in part at the reference, the California liberal extremist objected to Obama’s harsh words:

Rep. Maxine Waters is angry about President Barack Obama’s admonition to black Americans to “stop complaining.”

The California Democrat insisted during an interview on the “Early Show” on CBS today that he wouldn’t speak to any other group, such as Hispanics, Jews, or members of the gay and lesbian community, in such a disparaging way.

Obama, speaking Saturday at an awards dinner for the Congressional Black Caucus, told those present should “take off your bedroom slippers, put on your marching shoes. Shake it off. Stop complaining, stop grumbling, stop crying. We are going to press on. We’ve got work to do, CBC.”

Waters, a frequent Obama critic, responded on the “Early Show”: “I don’t know who he was talking to, because we’re certainly not complaining. We are working. We support him and we are protecting that base because we want people to be enthusiastic about him when that election rolls around.”

Earth to Maxine Waters: When President Barack Obama told black Americans to quit complaining, he was talking directly to YOU, darling!


Do yourself a favor and ‘Google” your name and take a peek at the quotes attributed to you recently. If that ain’t complaining, nothing is!

In fact, Rep. Waters, with your urgent pleas for Obama to do more for the black community, you have advocated, perhaps unwittingly, that racial profiling be used by the President to address unemployment.

Shame on you, Congresswoman!


Reference:

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/associated-press-transcription-obama-cbc-speech-racist-173438340.html

Reference
Waters Rips Obama's Scolding of Black Americans to 'Stop Complaining'

Obama’s Jobs Epiphany: Hire 230,000 Bureaucrats to BK Industry!

By John W. Lillpop

During the 2008 presidential campaign, Barack Obama admitted, without the slightest hint of shame, that he would use powers vested in the federal government to bankrupt private enterprise deemed politically incorrect by he and fellow Marxists.

After golfing with former President Bill Clinton for just a few hours, Obama experienced an epiphany which may allow him to fulfill his passion for destroying business, and do so in the righteous name of creating new jobs!

As reported at the reference, in part:

The Environmental Protection Agency has said new greenhouse gas regulations, as proposed, may be “absurd” in application and “impossible to administer” by its self-imposed 2016 deadline. But the agency is still asking for taxpayers to shoulder the burden of up to 230,000 new bureaucrats — at a cost of $21 billion — to attempt to implement the rules.

The EPA aims to regulate greenhouse gas emissions through the Clean Air Act, even though the law doesn’t give the EPA explicit power to do so. The agency’s authority to move forward is being challenged in court by petitioners who argue that such a decision should be left for Congress to make.

The proposed regulations would set greenhouse gas emission thresholds above which businesses must file for an EPA permit and complete extra paperwork in order to continue operating. If the EPA wins its court battle and fully rolls out the greenhouse gas regulations, the number of businesses forced into this regulatory regime would grow tremendously — from approximately 14,000 now to as many as 6.1 million”

Pity that Obama did not use his power to actually improve America.

For instance, hiring 230,000 new border patrol and ICE agents to secure the border AND deport illegals already here. would be a step in the direction, which is why Obama will never do it!

http://hotair.com/archives/2011/09/26/new-epa-regulations-would-require-230000-new-bureaucrats-to-administer/

Why Does Obama Begrudge Jewish Janitors Smart Enough to Be Billionaires?

Satire by John W. Lillpop


Fresh off his historic gaffe in which he stuck his right hand over the face of Mongolian President Tsakhia Elbegdorj at a photo-op last week, President Obama is going down a new and uncharted avenue of controversial campaign speech.

As reported at the reference, in part:

“While defending his call for the rich to pay more in taxes, the president said he didn’t mind people calling him a class warrior for merely asking a billionaire to pay the same tax rate as a Jew. Whoops!

The president meant to say “janitor” instead of “Jew,” and he immediately corrected himself.”

Although Obama claims to have been victimized by a slip of his own silver tongue, the truth is that when it comes to compiling ‘enemies lists,’ wise politicians try to identify as many “two-fers” as possible to keep campaign costs in check.

Which helps explain why Barack Obama is on the attack against billionaires who are also Jewish janitors. With just one ugly swat, the president can sock two of his least favorite demographics: Jews and billionaires.

It is rumored that Obama is none too fond of janitors, either, but that rumor cannot be confirmed.

It is also rumored that the prez is developing a distinct dislike for Caucasian executives who make solar panels, particularly CEOs who demand government loans as payback for campaign contributions and who then have the audacity to go bankrupt within 14 months of a presidential election.

The One’s ire is also reportedly agitated by Mexican drug cartel executives, especially the really stupid sort, who kill a U.S. border patrol agent with a gun provided by, and traceable back, to Eric Holder and the White House, again within 14 months of a presidential election.

Is there any occupation-racial mix that Obama is generally at peace with?

According to sources deep within the White House, Obama finds nothing at all objectionable about black community organizers with very low approval ratings!






http://dailycaller.com/2011/09/25/obama-gaffe-president-says-billionaires-should-pay-the-jew-tax-rate/#ixzz1Z5I61s8x

From a Warrior for Rule of Law: It's NOT About Racism or Hate--It's Math!

By John W. Lillpop

Millions of American citizens are in serious financial trouble.

Consider the pandemic of economic ruin running rampant in our great nation:

Unemployment and underemployment have idled or undercut 14-25 million Americans. In the black community, the devastation is even more pronounced, the suffering all the greater.

Foreclosures and bankruptcies are at record levels.

Millions of Americans owe more on their homes than the homes are worth.

40-50 million Americans are on food stamps.

Young adults are being forced to move back into the homes of their parents just to survive.

New graduates from college are finding jobs nearly non-existent.

Skyrocketing costs for food, medicine and bare essentials are forcing millions to choose between vital medicines and paying the rent or mortgage.

The nation debt is at 14 trillion and counting, with no way out for the federal government.

On and on it goes as Americans are pummeled by the ravages of recession, and a government that refuses to take our dire financial circumstance to heart.

The bitter, awful truth is that America is broke.

Once looked to as the ‘Sugar Daddy’ for the world, our great, benevolent nation must now stand in line, with tin cup in hand.

The absolutely maddening question in all this is: With tens of millions of American citizens suffering so greatly, why in the hell are ding bat politicians, mostly, but not all, Democrats so anxious to spend money on illegal aliens, people who have no legitimate legal or moral basis for being here?

Why are Democrats like Harry Reid and Barack Obama pushing a DREAM act for illegal aliens when millions of citizens are so desperate?

What sense does it make for a state (like Texas, to name one) to allow illegal aliens to take advantage of in-state tuition rates? Are there no American citizens who are just as needy and actually worthy of such benevolence, in Texas and other American states?

With so many Americans unable to secure sustainable employment, why in the hell are Barack Obama and most Democrats chopping at the bit to grant amnesty to 12-20 illegal aliens, millions of whom are in jobs which should be filled by Americans?

Illegal aliens cost taxpayers $110 billion a year! A super committee of Congress is working to cut $1.5 trillion dollars from the deficit, and yet NO ONE is questioning the prudence of spending $110 billion a year on illegal aliens! WHY?

The once great state of California is perennially burdened with a shortfall of about $10 billion. California spends about that amount to support illegal aliens each year—why is NO ONE investigating this outrageous and foolish failure to protect the citizenry of this liberal-infested state?


Have our leaders all lost their damn minds? Why in the hell are state governments all across America firing hundreds of thousand of citizens while funding benefits of illegal alien?

Some will accuse me of immigrant bashing, racism, anti-Hispanic hate speech and other gooey-eyed liberal accusations to avoid accountability and the truth.

The real truth is that America can no longer afford to allow tens of millions of uneducated, unskilled, and non-speaking foreigners to ignore our borders and immigration laws while American citizens suffer so desperately!

That is not racism—rather, to quote a befuddled community organizer of some prominence, it is the math!

Time to heed the math and end the invasions of our great nation AND deport the illegals already here!

Solyndra Fiasco Perfect Example of Why Congress Must NOT ‘Pass This Bill Now!’

Whether or not Obama’s bungling of the Solyndra mess involved criminal or unethical behavior is a question that must, and presumably will, be answered as a result of Congressional and internal inquiries which have been launched into the entire mess.

However, one thing seems perfectly clear: This administration lacks the business acumen and judgment needed to invest taxpayer money in a prudent, wise manner.

Indeed, scoring political points and rewarding large campaign donors may have been greater priorities than exercising due diligence.

One remembers that, back in February of 2009, newly-installed President Obama warned Congress that passing his almost one trillion dollar stimulus bill was so urgent that it simply could not wait. Congress was urged to pass the stimulus bill immediately, literally on blind faith alone.

That “Pass this Bill Now!” urgency in 2009 appears to have been a major reason for the overall failure of the stimulus bill, and in particular the disastrous results of the Solyndra loan guarantee.

Congress must not repeat the mistake of caving into another ‘Pass This Bill Now!’ rant from President Obama.

The last thing America needs is to waste even more taxpayer treasure on a progressive fairy tale pushed by a naïve community organizer!


By John W. Lillpop

Vetting Governor Christie on Illegal Aliens

By John W. Lillpop


By ‘clarifying’ his position on illegal aliens and the DREAM act during the GOP debate in Orlando, Governor Rick Perry managed to insult millions of good American people (most of whom are blessed with hearts) who sincerely believe that illegals are a serious threat to this nation’s homeland security, sovereignty, and above all else, the rule of law.

Those same patriots also believe that any actions which reward illegals with in-state tuition, driver's licenses, and other benefits serve only to encourage ever greater numbers to come here illegally.

Consequently, as the Rick Perry candidacy smolders in the ruins of self-inflicted waterboarding, conservatives looking for a candidate with a strong, pro-America resume on illegal aliens have been forced to rethink and reboot.

During the course of that process, the name of Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey has inevitably surfaced and, because of his tough fiscal manners, the Governor is being pressured to ‘reconsider’ his non-candidacy for the presidency.

However, a cursory vetting of the rotund Governor exposes the fact that he is a flaming RINO when it comes to illegal aliens.

As documented at the reference, in part:

If Chris Christie really does intend to present himself as some sort of conservative leader on the national scene, he's got a lot of 'splainin' to do about his position on illegal immigration.

That phrase, by the way, comes from Desi Arnaz of "I Love Lucy" fame. Desi was, quite famously, an immigrant - a legal one.

Arnaz took advantage of the "path to citizenship" that was then, and is now, available to foreigners.

So just what is Christie hinting at when he tells Jake Tapper in the clip above that we need a "commonsense path to citizenship." We already have one, and more than a million people a year take advantage of it.

What's he's hinting at, of course, is amnesty. But pols know the A-word scares voters, so they use the slippery "path to citizenship" line to fool the public. Are you fooled? Me neither.

But I love when our governor tells Tapper "there have been folks all over the map on this bill."

Yeah, folks named Chris Christie. Recently he criticized Arizona officials for attempting to do what he so conspicuously failed to do as U.S. Attorney - enforce immigration law.

The same reference continues:

If Christie really intends to make a move nationally, he'd better buy up every copy of the Lou Dobbs clip below:

So there we have it: Another double-talking RINO on illegal aliens.

Sorry Governor, but American don’t need another stinkin’ pro-illegal alien president!

Explaining the ‘Obama Wave’

By John W. Lillpop


In a gaffe that will be damn near impossible to blame on George Bush, President Barack Obama stuck his right hand over the face of Mongolian President Tsakhia Elbegdorj's just as a camera was taking a group photo at the United Nations.

Thus was born the Obama Wave, not be confused with the Obama Waive which is used to exempt campaign donors,political buddies,and extortionists from the ravages of ObamaCare and No Child Left Behind.


Pundits have scratched their heads in trying to determine why Obama raised his hand.

As it turns out, the photographer had just asked the group a question as shown below:

All who think President Obama is the smartest person in the world and who absolutely adore him, please raise your right hand!

Russian Politics: Putin-Obama in 2012?

Satire by John W. Lillpop

As reported at the reference, Vladimir Putin announced that he will run to be Russia’s President in 2012.

Although I am not all that familiar with Russian politics, I am sure that Vlady will need a good, hard-line communist to join him on the ticket as Veep nominee.

You know, a dedicated Marxist who hates capitalism and America in equal measures.

Putin will be looking for someone with recent experience in circumventing the U.S. Constitution, American rule of law, and other subversive ventures designed to make America a second-tier military and political entity.

Vlady’s running mate must be a gifted orator with a unique ability to operate a teleprompter. Style rather than substance is what Putin is looking for in the ideal candidate, mostly because he wants to be the main attraction.

Very difficult to meet all of the Putin requirements, you say?

Hmm.

Seems to me that there is a dedicated Marxist who will be looking for a new job in 2012 and who otherwise fits the bill to serve as Putin’s running mate.

That would be our very own Barack Obama, although he may be a bit too ideologically radical for the more stoic Putin.

The other potential obstacle has to do with discrimination against minorities: Namely, is Russia ready for a Muslim in Moscow?



http://news.yahoo.com/putin-run-russian-presidency-2012-113657360.html

Millions of Citizens Are in Great Need: Why Do Politicians Spend Hundreds of Billions on Illegal Aliens?

By John W. Lillpop

Millions of American citizens are in serious financial trouble.

Consider the pandemic of economic ruin running rampant in our great nation:

Unemployment and underemployment have idled or undercut 14-25 million Americans. In the black community, the devastation is even more pronounced, the suffering all the greater.

Foreclosures and bankruptcies are at record levels.

Millions of Americans owe more on their homes than the homes are worth.

40-50 million Americans are on food stamps.

Young adults are being forced to move back into the homes of their parents just to survive.

New graduates from college are finding jobs nearly non-existent.

Skyrocketing costs for food, medicine and bare essentials are forcing millions to choose between vital medicines and paying the rent or mortgage.

The nation debt is at 14 trillion and counting, with no way out for the federal government.

On and on it goes as Americans are pummeled by the ravages of recession, and a government that refuses to take our dire financial circumstance to heart.

The bitter, awful truth is that America is broke.

Once looked to as the ‘Sugar Daddy’ for the world, our great, benevolent nation must now stand in line, with tin cup in hand.

The absolutely maddening question in all this is: With tens of millions of American citizens suffering so greatly, why in the hell are ding bat politicians, mostly, but not all, Democrats so anxious to spend money on illegal aliens, people who have no legitimate legal or moral basis for being here?

Why are Democrats like Harry Reid and Barack Obama pushing a DREAM act for illegal aliens when millions of citizens are so desperate?

What sense does it make for a state (like Texas, to name one) to allow illegal aliens to take advantage of in-state tuition rates? Are there no American citizens who are just as needy and actually worthy of such benevolence, in Texas and other American states?

With so many Americans unable to secure sustainable employment, why in the hell are Barack Obama and most Democrats chopping at the bit to grant amnesty to 12-20 illegal aliens, millions of whom are in jobs which should be filled by Americans?

Illegal aliens cost taxpayers $110 billion a year! A super committee of Congress is working to cut $1.5 trillion dollars from the deficit, and yet NO ONE is questioning the prudence of spending $110 billion a year on illegal aliens! WHY?

The once great state of California is perennially burdened with a shortfall of about $10 billion. California spends about that amount to support illegal aliens each year—why is NO ONE investigating this outrageous and foolish failure to protect the citizenry of this liberal-infested state?


Have our leaders all lost their damn minds? Why in the hell are state governments all across America firing hundreds of thousand of citizens while funding benefits of illegal alien?

Some will accuse me of immigrant bashing, racism, anti-Hispanic hate speech and other gooey-eyed liberal accusations to avoid accountability and the truth.

The real truth is that America can no longer afford to allow tens of millions of uneducated, unskilled, and non-speaking foreigners to ignore our borders and immigration laws while American citizens suffer so desperately!

That is not racism—rather, to quote a befuddled community organizer of some prominence, it is the math!

Time to heed the math and end the invasions of our great nation AND deport the parasites already here!

Obama Jobs Plan: Based on Math, or Wishful Thinking?

By John W. Lillpop


Last week, President Obama tried to defend his Jobs Plan against recalcitrant critics by declaring, “This is not class warfare. It's math."

As it turns out Hope, rather than math, dominates much of his plan.

Consider, please, comments made by Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics, the professional who projected that the Jobs Plan would result in the creation of 1.9 million jobs, reduce unemployment, and increase gross domestic product.

Zandi’s comments, reported at the reference, include the following disturbing facts:

The projections for new jobs, reduction in unemployment, etc., is based on Zandi’s assumption that the Plan will be passed, in its entirety, by Congress before the end of the year, and that there are no other budgetary issues which upset the apple cart.

Of course that is unmitigated nonsense.

Congress is hopelessly divided on the issue and the Jobs Plan will not even be on the Senate calendar until October.

So much for Obama’s “Pass this bill now!” urgency!

Meanwhile, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is threatening a shut down the government next week over a Continuing Resolution needed to keep the government running.

Given that heated partisan environment, how likely is it that Congress will pass a Jobs Plan that proposes to spend another $457 billion on “stimulus” by taxing the hell out of those who, for no reason other than their extraordinary success, are on Obama’s enemies list?

Adding to the insanity is this little noticed fact: The projected growth in jobs applies ONLY to 2012!

Starting in 2013, Obama’s Jobs Plan becomes a “drag” on the economy. Zandi dire forecast includes this statement, "So by 2015, the economy is in the same place as now, as if there were no jobs package."

How convenient, and presumably coincidental, that the projected creation of jobs begins just before the 2012 election, only to fade away in 2013!

However, while job growth dissipates, the $457 billion in new taxes is still owed.

Finally, Zandi pointed out that should a new recession befall the nation, all of his positive projections will be nullified.

Some economists believe that a double-dip recession has already arrived, while others believe that the original recession never ended.

The bottom line is that Obama’s Jobs Plan is a cruel mockery of the devastating problems facing this nation.

In fact, Obama’s Plan is all about “games, politics, and delay,” and is nothing more than an opening salvo in the war to win the White House thirteen + months from now.

America needs a plan for dealing with the economic decimation of our great nation.

Instead, Barack Obama delivered a plan for getting reelected.



http://news.yahoo.com/obama-plan-small-dent-jobless-rate-081609652.html

FED UP with RINOs from Texas!

By John W. Lillpop

In 2010, Governor Rick Perry(R-Texas) authored a book titled FED UP!, which chronicles the Governor’s anger and frustration at Washington, D.C. and what he sees as the deliberate usurping of the rights and liberties of American citizens by Washington bureaucrats.

From all appearances, Perry is the quintessential conservative, the go-to man when it comes to poking holes in the flawed logic of moon bat liberals who favor big government.

Unfortunately, upon further investigation, Perry’s conservative credentials are blemished, almost to the point of extinction, by virtue of his very liberal views on illegal aliens.

At the GOP Presidential debate in Orlando, Florida on September 22, Perry said:

If you say that we should not educate children who come into our state for no other reason than that they've been brought their through no fault of their own, I don't think you have a heart," Perry said. "We need to be educating these children because they will become a drag on our society. I think that's what Texans wanted to do. Out of 181 members of the Texas legislature when this issue came up [there were] only four dissenting votes. This was a state issue. Texas voted on it. And I still support it today."

_

Perry’s outrageous statement made it clear that he is another Texas RINO who simply does not respect the rule of law and American sovereignty.

Consequently, I have decided to publish my own book titled, FED UP with RINOS from Texas!, which chronicles my rage at cowboys from Texas who somehow manage to steal the White House based on false claims and who subsequently sell out the American people to the failed state of Mexico.

Excerpts from my masterpiece follow:


Dear Governor Perry:

Patriotic Americans all across our great land are flying the American flag upside down this morning, at least metaphorically, to signify our severe disappointment at your performance during the Republican debate in Florida on September 22.

Our ire was aroused by your position on illegal aliens which we believe to be “naive, arrogant, misguided, and dangerous.”

At issue is nothing less vital than homeland security, rule of law, American sovereignty, and preservation of American language and culture, all of which are threatened by those who propose to coddle illegal aliens and reward these criminals with in-state tuition and other lures that will only attract tens of millions more invaders to our blessed nation.


Just to make sure that our views are clearly understood, please be advised that we the people are FED UP with the attempt to undermine American sovereignty, homeland security, and culture.

In short, we the people are:

FED UP with the refusal of the federal government to secure our borders at time of war.

FED UP when armed Mexicans illegally cross our borders and assault Americans, yet our government takes no action, and refuses to even protest.

FED UP when Americans defending the U.S. from drug smuggling illegal aliens are sent to federal prison, while invading criminals are to be forgiven via amnesty for violating our borders and laws.

FED UP with the fact that upwards of 20 million illegal aliens are currently in America, costing taxpayers at least $110 billion dollars every year.

FED UP with a president who orders thousands of young Americans into harm's way thousands of miles from home, but who refuses to secure America.

FED UP with politicians who refuse to enforce immigration laws and who claim it is "impossible" to deport criminals here illegally.

FED UP with illegal aliens who can not and/or will not speak English.

FED UP with taxpayer dollars being wasted to print documents in foreign languages.

FED UP with illegal aliens who dump their medical bills on the backs of U.S. taxpayers, but who send $30-40 billion a year back to Mexico each year.

FED UP with the fact that providing free medical services to illegal aliens drives hospitals out of business, making those facilities unavailable to American citizens for whom the medical centers were intended.

FED UP with our schools being invaded by non-English speaking children who impede the learning process of students who genuinely belong here.

FED UP with the fact that federal, state, and local penal systems are overrun by illegal aliens, again costing taxpayers billions each year.


FED UP with the fact that the overwhelming majority of felony crimes being investigated in Los Angeles have been committed by illegals from Mexico.

FED UP with politicians who refuse to round up and deport millions of illegal aliens who are destroying American culture and language.

FED UP with politicians who pamper illegal aliens with driver's licenses and free public services such as in-state tuition, which encourage even more invaders to come to America.

FED UP with the attempted Mexicanization of America. Mexico is a third- world slum, and we are FED UP with those who want America to be like Mexico!

Finally, we the people are FED UP with those who consistently work on behalf of illegal aliens and the state of Mexico, and against the interests of the American people!

Please know that because of your RINO support for illegal aliens, we cannot support your candidacy.

Regards,

AMERICA PATRIOTS FROM COAST TO COAST

Rick Perry, You Are No Conservative!

By John W. Lillpop


When it comes to conservative values and Candidate Rick Perry, the verdict is in: Governor Perry, you are no conservative!

Mr. Perry deserves that harsh put-down because of his despicable performance in Orlando when he assaulted those who oppose in-state tuition for illegal aliens as being without heart.

At the debate, Perry said:

If you say that we should not educate children who come into our state for no other reason than that they've been brought their through no fault of their own, I don't think you have a heart," Perry said. "We need to be educating these children because they will become a drag on our society. I think that's what Texans wanted to do. Out of 181 members of the Texas legislature when this issue came up [there were] only four dissenting votes. This was a state issue. Texas voted on it. And I still support it today."

Point, set, match!

Time to go back to Texas and fight fires or whatever, Governor!

True conservatives respect the rule of law, U.S. borders, and American sovereignty.

Its all about having a heart (and brain) for America and her citizens and defending our nation against invasions from foreigners who have zero respect for the law and American culture.

Foreign invaders come here illegally to avoid the medical, criminal, and financial background checks required for LEGAL migration, said checks vital to protecting the American citizenry from disease, dangerous criminals and or terrorists, and financial parasites;

Foreign invaders cost American taxpayers $110 billion a year for education, health care, housing and other benefits to which they are not entitled, at a time when our nation is damn near bankrupt;

Foreign invaders do not speak English and refuse to learn, and are generally uneducated and unskilled;

Foreign invaders often owe allegiance to their nation(s) of origin and reject American culture.

There are 12-20 million illegal aliens currently occupying America. This is an outrageous breach of rule of law and any action that will encourage additional invasions from south of our borders is both treasonous and wrong-minded!

Simply put Governor Perry, you position on illegal aliens is “naive, arrogant, misguided, and dangerous.”

Your position of illegals is, “Obama light” and as such is unacceptable to true conservatives!

Adios!

Obama’s Troubled Bridge Canard

By John W. Lillpop

Rejecting his own call for “No Games, No Politics,” President Obama used an old bridge over the Ohio River as a prop for promoting his latest half-trillion dollar stimulus to Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio.

As reported at reference 1, in part:

Obama called out by name Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky, and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, as he spoke near the Brent Spence Bridge that carries Interstates 75 and 71 over the Ohio River.

"Mr. Boehner, Mr. McConnell, help us rebuild this bridge," Obama cried. "Help us rebuild America. Help us put this country back to work. Pass this jobs bill right away."

As it turns out, the bridge in question is not scheduled for repair until 2015!

Seems as though Obama is determined to repeat the goofy mistakes of Stimulus 1, about which Obama was eventually forced to concede ‘’Shovel-ready was not as … uh .. shovel-ready as we expected.’

Furthermore, despite Obama’s ‘Pass This Bill Now!’ and ‘No Delay’ mania repeated over and over, the urgency of the moment seems to be lost on some Democrats in the U.S. Senate, including Majority Leader Harry Reid.

As reported, in part, at reference 2:

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Republicans won’t support President Barack Obama’s jobs plan, but he still wants them to vote on the sweeping $450 billion economic recovery effort.

“We are going to have the Republicans belly up to the bar to turn down this plan,” Reid said during a virtual town hall meeting with supporters Wednesday.

Reid said he won’t immediately take up Obama’s plan because the Senate must tackle other issues first. He didn’t specify which bills would receive priority over Obama’s economic solution.

Reid has said he will put the bill on the legislative calendar but has declined to say when. He almost certainly will push the bill — which Mr. Obama urged Congress to pass “right now!” — until after his chamber’s recess at the end of the month; Mr. Reid has set votes on disaster aid, extensions for the Federal Aviation Administration and a short-term spending plan ahead of the jobs bill.

Part Of The Reason for the delay may be that some Senate Democrats still aren’t sold on the plan:

Democrats, as is their wont, are divided over their objections, which stem from Mr. Obama’s sinking popularity in polls, parochial concerns and the party’s chronic inability to unite around a legislative initiative, even in the face of Republican opposition.

Some are unhappy about the specific types of companies, particularly the oil industry, that would lose tax benefits. “I have said for months that I am not supporting a repeal of tax cuts for the oil industry unless there are other industries that contribute,” said Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana.

A small but vocal group dislikes the payroll tax cuts for employees and small businesses. “I have been very unequivocal,” said Representative Peter A. DeFazio, a Democrat from Oregon. “No more tax cuts.”

His voice rising to a near shriek, he added: “We have the economy that tax cuts give us. And it’s pretty pathetic, isn’t it? The president is in a box.”

There are also Democrats, some of them senators up for election in 2012, who oppose the bill simply for its mental connection to the stimulus bill, which laid at least part of the foundation for the Republican takeover of the U.S. House in 2010.

“I have serious questions about the level of spending that President Obama proposed,” said Senator Joe Manchin III, a Democrat from West Virginia, in a statement issued right after Mr. Obama spoke to a joint session of Congress last week.”

How in the hell can President Obama expect anyone to take his “Plan” seriously when members of his own party are ignoring his cries?



Reference 1 http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/09/23/2421041/at-ohio-river-bridge-obama-calls.html#ixzz1YmTDznD9


Reference 2
http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/harry-reid-no-rush-on-president-obamas-jobs-bill/

Just What Part of ‘Pass This Bill NOW!’ Do Democrats Not Understand?

By John W. Lillpop

Despite President Obama’s hysterical ‘Pass This Bill Now!’ and ‘No Delay’ admonitions repeated over and over, the urgency of the moment seems to be lost on some Democrats in the U.S. Senate, including Majority Leader Harry Reid.


As reported, in part, at the reference:

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Republicans won’t support President Barack Obama’s jobs plan, but he still wants them to vote on the sweeping $450 billion economic recovery effort.

“We are going to have the Republicans belly up to the bar to turn down this plan,” Reid said during a virtual town hall meeting with supporters Wednesday.

Reid said he won’t immediately take up Obama’s plan because the Senate must tackle other issues first. He didn’t specify which bills would receive priority over Obama’s economic solution.

Reid has said he will put the bill on the legislative calendar but has declined to say when. He almost certainly will push the bill — which Mr. Obama urged Congress to pass “right now!” — until after his chamber’s recess at the end of the month; Mr. Reid has set votes on disaster aid, extensions for the Federal Aviation Administration and a short-term spending plan ahead of the jobs bill.

Part Of The Reason for the delay may be that some Senate Democrats still aren’t sold on the plan:

Democrats, as is their wont, are divided over their objections, which stem from Mr. Obama’s sinking popularity in polls, parochial concerns and the party’s chronic inability to unite around a legislative initiative, even in the face of Republican opposition.

Some are unhappy about the specific types of companies, particularly the oil industry, that would lose tax benefits. “I have said for months that I am not supporting a repeal of tax cuts for the oil industry unless there are other industries that contribute,” said Senator Mary L. Landrieu of Louisiana.

A small but vocal group dislikes the payroll tax cuts for employees and small businesses. “I have been very unequivocal,” said Representative Peter A. DeFazio, a Democrat from Oregon. “No more tax cuts.”

His voice rising to a near shriek, he added: “We have the economy that tax cuts give us. And it’s pretty pathetic, isn’t it? The president is in a box.”

There are also Democrats, some of them senators up for election in 2012, who oppose the bill simply for its mental connection to the stimulus bill, which laid at least part of the foundation for the Republican takeover of the U.S. House in 2010.

“I have serious questions about the level of spending that President Obama proposed,” said Senator Joe Manchin III, a Democrat from West Virginia, in a statement issued right after Mr. Obama spoke to a joint session of Congress last week.”

How in the hell can President Obama expect Republicans and the American people to take his “Plan” seriously when members of his own party are ignoring him?



http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/harry-reid-no-rush-on-president-obamas-jobs-bill/

Barack Obama: A Global Embarrassment

By John W. Lillpop


President Obama’s ‘Peace Is Hard’ speech before the United Nations on September 21 put U.S. allies, as well as enemies, on notice: America the great is no more. Or to be more blunt, Exceptionally unexceptional is us!

The president appeared weak, tired, and confused, due in part to the fact that his soaring oratory from 2010 has proven unsustainable, when compared to reality.

Scoundrels in Syria, North Korea, and Iran must have found hope in the president’s weakness. The obvious muting of American strength and preeminence will surely embolden the ‘bad guys’ to take greater risks, a fact that makes the world dramatically less safe than it was when Obama took office in 2009.

What will motivate Iran to abandon its quest of a nuclear weapon now that America is no longer interested or capable of providing effective opposition?

Why would North Korea bother to be more civil and accommodating now that the United States is run by a pacifist who prefers to ‘lead from behind’?

Threatening Syrian President Assad with more sanctions is a far cry from rattling a few American sabers in the tyrant’s face.

To Americans, President Obama is now a major embarrassment, both domestically and on the world stage.

Although George W. Bush often delivered speeches replete in broken syntax and mangled grammar, at least the world knew that America was a force to reckon with. And yes, even fear.

By contrast, when Obama speaks, the only fear resides in the hearts of patriotic Americans who are witnessing first hand the decimation of a proud and great nation by an elitist more suited for lecturing than leading.

Is America Ready for “Michelle-Care”?

Satire by John W. Lillpop


Given the overwhelming public support and success of the ObamaCare health care scheme, White House insiders are privately reporting that first lady Michelle Obama is planning her own Marxist program for dealing with America’s ever-expanding waist lines and blubber pandemic, known in polite circles as obesity.

Although Michelle-Care has yet to be put into legislative language, we are told that the plan has wide support among moon bats everywhere and, best of all, has the blessings of the president who has said he will sign the bill as soon as right-wing extremists stop playing political games.

Because Michelle-Care is still being developed, many of the details are unknown.

However, this much seems certain:


* Federal Height-Weight Standards

Using the much-despised standards issued by insurance companies, Michelle-Care will, beginning in 2014, require that all Americans submit to an annual physical examination by a licensed doctor, and that said exam include a precise measurement of height and weight.

Results shall be digitally-reported to the regional IRS enforcement office within ten hours and made a part of the permanent record for the victim.

Victims who exceed the federal standard will be subject to a $5,000 fine for each violation. Repeat offenders may also face criminal charges and incarceration, if deemed appropriate by the attending IRS agent.

* Government-Approved Foods

Prevention of obesity and attendant diseases is the ultimate objective of Michelle-Care. To that end, the bill will include a detailed list of government foods that are healthy choices and without salt, sugar, fat and other ingredients that lead to high-blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, and obesity.

Random tests are being developed by government scientists to detect the presence of salt, sugar, etc. in the blood of children and young adults in the public education system.

Appropriate sanctions will be implemented to protect children from abusive parents who allow unauthorized foods to be consumed at home or school. In some instances, it will be necessary for the government to take a child into protective custody for the well-being of the child, and to execute criminal charges against the offending parents.

* Job Creation

Because Michelle-Care will mandate the creation of several new government bureaucracies and the hiring of 20,000 IRS enforcement agents, the president will claim credit for creating about 400,000 jobs for the economy.

* Deficit Neutral

For those who care about the run-away federal deficit, Michelle-Care provides great news: All spending will be paid for by a special “Health Tax” that will be assessed on families making more than $250,000 a year. Should the actual costs associated with Michelle-Care exceed estimates, the president will be authorized to unilaterally increase the “Health Tax” as needed to assure that the deficit-neutral nature of Michelle-Care is not breached.

* Waivers

As was the case with ObamaCare, waivers may be granted in cases of extreme hardship. For instance, Hispanics generally consume foods high in fats and salt. Because of their increasing power as a voting block, waivers may be needed to level the playing field for these vital Americans.


Michelle-Care will be put into legislative lingo as soon as possible and introduced to Congress shortly thereafter.

President Obama will urge passage as soon as possible, without delay, and sans games and politics.

Michelle-Care: Is America ready for this Marxist baloney?

Debbie Wasserman Shultz Implies(Indirectly) that Bill Clinton Was Dishonorable and un-American!

Debbie Wasserman Shultz Implies(Indirectly) that Bill Clinton Was Dishonorable and un-American!


By John W. Lillpop

In her haste to find something to cheer about, DNC Chairwoman appears to have inadvertently ripped President Bill Clinton.

In recognition of the end to the ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ policy, the fuzzyheaded leftist said the following:

This policy undermined our military readiness and weakened our national security, costing our nation hundreds of millions of dollars with the needless loss of mission-critical service men and women, military personnel, linguists, and other specialists whose skills are vital to the success of our armed services. It was dishonorable and fundamentally un-American, and we celebrate today as it officially becomes a relic of the past.

Do you suppose that this pathetic dim wit is unaware of the fact that DADT was signed into law by Democrat President Bill Clinton?


http://www.democrats.org/news/blog/dnc_chair_debbie_wasserman_schultzs_statement_on_official_end_of_dont_ask_d

House to Probe Obama Solar Loans, Fulfill Oversight Responsibility

By John W. Lillpop

President Obama’s doings involving loans and other activities to promote solar energy are going to be investigated by Congress, thereby fulfilling a vital oversight duty which was ignored during the Nancy Pelosi tenure as Speaker of the U.S. House.

As reported, in part, at the reference


Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said Tuesday that his committee plans to investigate government loan programs to private corporations in light of allegations of improper dealings between the White House and failed energy company Solyndra and wireless start-up LightSquared.


"I want to see when the president and his cronies are picking winners and losers… it wasn't because there were large contributions given to them," the chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee said Tuesday morning on C-SPAN.”

Rep. Issa is to be commended for taking on this chore; however, there are several other issues involving potential high-crimes and misdemeanors which the House should investigate, including:

 Willful violation of the War Powers Act in war actions taken in Libya;
 Fast and Furious scandal in which weapons were walked into Mexico by the Obama Administration, leading to the murder of an American border patrol agent;
 Refusal to enforce the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, Including deliberate malfeasance with respect to deportation of illegal aliens;

 Refusal to act responsibly with respect to America’s fiscal affairs. Said negligence leading to the loss of America’s AAA credit rating.

There are no doubt other instances of abuse of power and corruption by this president.

The US House needs to bundle all of the crimes into one impeachment inquiry.

The operative words for the GOP should be: THINK BIG!

Time for a Palestinian State--In Saudi Arabia!

Time for a Palestinian State--In Saudi Arabia!


By John W. Lillpop

By now everyone knows that the Palestinians and the Jews of Israel can never live in peace. Both sides hate the other with a passion that we Americans will never be able to grasp.

Jews fighting Palestinians is like cats chasing mice: It’s a part of nature that always has been, always will be.

Still, the world pines for a Palestinian state right in the midst of Israel. A ‘no-Jew allowed’ state, to make things ever so more complex.

The Israel-Palestinian turmoil has existed forever—so what makes a naïve community organizer from the alleys of Chicago think he can fix this mess?

The answer is unbridled arrogance peppered with ghastly ignorance!

Obama’s mouthing off about the Israel-Palestinian kerfuffel has already cost him needed support among Jews, including the turnover of Anthony Weiner’s seat to a Republican, the first such happening since 1923.

The president’s dithering is about to cost him even more deterioration of prestige when the Jews and Palestinians take off the gloves at the UN this week.

If Obama orders the veto of the Palestinian bid for statehood, he will see a deterioration of relationships with Saudi Arabia and other Arab nations.

On the other hand, if the US does not block the Palestinian bid, American Jews may bolt and hammer the final nail in Obama’s dwindling reelection chances.

Truly, the situation seems insolvable for The One, who already is knee-deep in problems created by his lonesome.

In the perpetual food fight between the Jews and Palestinians, the ONLY solution with a prayer of working is to keep the parties as far apart as possible.

Given the fact that Israel is so tiny which makes separation impossible, the alternative that seems to make sense would to carve out an appropriate chunk of Saudi Arabia and designation said land as the state of Palestine.

Surely, with all of the land and resources at his disposal, King Abdullah would not begrudge assignment of a minor piece to the Palestinians, in the name of peace.

After all, Islam is the religion of peace, right?

Are Modern-Day Progressives “Racists”?

By John W. Lillpop

For nearly three years, conventional wisdom has held that anyone with the audacity to disagree with Barack Obama, much less criticize The One, was presumed to be a despicable racist.

From Tea Party activists who would allegedly pay good money to see black folks hanging, to right-wing nut balls like GOP Representative Paul Ryan who was plotting a black Holocaust using budget cuts rather than gas chambers to subdue victims, to everyday, common folks who believe that government should live within its means, to goofy talk-show hosts like Rush Limbaugh, the message was the same: They are all racists!

That message has been consistent—until recently.

As reported at the reference, some of Barack Obama’s harshest critics are turning out to be far-left progressives:

President Obama’s smooth path to the Democratic nomination may have gotten rockier Monday, after a group of liberal leaders, including former presidential candidate Ralph Nader, announced plans to challenge the incumbent in primaries next year.

The group said the goal is to offer up a handful of candidates from various fields and areas where the president either has failed to stake out a “progressive” position or where he has “drifted toward the corporatist right.”

“Without debates by challengers inside the Democratic Party’s presidential primaries, the liberal/majoritarian agenda will be muted and ignored,” Mr. Nader said in a news release. “The one-man Democratic primaries will be dull, repetitive, and draining of both voter enthusiasm and real bright lines between the two parties that excite voters.”

In search of candidates, Mr. Nader and the others sent out a letter, endorsed by 45 “distinguished leaders,
”to elected officials, civic leaders, academics and members of the progressive community who specialize among other things in labor, poverty, military and foreign policy. The list, they said, also includes progressive Democrats who have held national and state office and have fought for progressive reforms.

“We need to put strong Democratic pressure on President Obama in the name of poor and working people,” said Cornel West, author and professor at Princeton University who has been highly critical of Mr. Obama’s tenure since helping him get elected in 2008. “His administration has tilted too much toward Wall Street, we need policies that empower Main Street.

Mr. Nader and Mr. West are joined by Christ Townsend, of the United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America, and Brent Blackwelder, president emeritus of Friends of the Earth.”

Does this revelation mean that anyone who might run against Obama as a primary challenger is a dangerous racist with hanging on his/her mind?

Just asking!


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/sep/19/liberals-vow-challenge-obama-democratic-primaries/

Chicago Tribune to Obama: Vacate Oval Office by January 20, 2013!

By John W. Lillpop

Poor Barack Obama. With his approval ratings in the tank and dropping, the last thing The One needs is for his hometown newspaper to desert him.

But that is exactly what happened as reported, in part, at the reference:

On Sunday Steve Chapman wrote in the Chicago Tribune that “Obama might do his party a big favor big favor” by not seeking reelection.

There is good news for the president. I checked the Constitution, and he is under no compulsion to run for re-election. He can scrap the campaign, bag the fundraising calls and never watch another Republican debate as long as he’s willing to vacate the premises by Jan. 20, 2013. That might be the sensible thing to do. It’s hard for a president to win a second term when unemployment is painfully high. If the economy were in full rebound mode, Obama might win anyway. But it isn’t, and it may fall into a second recession — in which case voters will decide his middle name is Hoover, not Hussein. Why not leave of his own volition instead of waiting to get the ax? It’s not as though there is much enticement to stick around. Presidents who win re-election have generally found, wrote John Fortier and Norman Ornstein in their 2007 book, “Second-Term Blues,” that “their second terms did not measure up to their first.”

Get that Mr. President? You are not required to run for reelection?

Why not pull a “Lyndon Johnson,” Mr. President, and announce that you will not seek reelection?

Then watch your approval ratings soar!

Longing for a Reagan in Politics? Great News, Michael May Run Against Diane Feinstein!

By John W. Lillpop

Those of us who miss Ronald Reagan and his staunch conservatism may find relief in 2012.

As reported at the reference, the Gipper’s son Michael may stick his toe in the water by running against California Democrat Diane Feinstein, who is well past retirement age, both in years and ideology:

“Michael Reagan, son of the former president, told the San Francisco Chronicle that he's looking at challenging California Senator Dianne Feinstein in 2012.

A poll out this week showed Feinstein with the highest negatives in her nearly 20 years in the Senate. Results that would presumably give Reagan or any other Republican interested in making a challenge an increased reason to do so.

So far no Republicans have announced for the race. Reagan declined to answer further questions about his intentions.

This week it was learned that Feinstein's campaign accounts were "wiped out" in the accounting scandal that linked her to longtime treasurer Kinde Durkee. The latest FEC filings show Feinstein with more than five million dollars in the bank, but it's not clear how much of that money actually exists or when the campaign might be able to access its remaining funds.”

Clearly, a woman who cannot keep track of her own campaign money has no business being in a position of power in these times of economic chaos and despair.

A Reagan victory in 2012 would help restore fiscal and social sanity after 20 years of leftist malfeasance at the hands of Diane Feinstein.

Reagan would also offset some of the Marxist insanity represented by Feinstein’s diminutive partner in crime, the unlovable Barbara “Don’t call me madam” Boxer.

Run Michael, Run!



http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/09/17/michael-reagan-considering-run-against-senator-dianne-feinstein-in-2012/#ixzz1YJkxE7u1

‘Fast and Furious’ Scandal Explodes!

By John W. Lillpop

Much to the chagrin of President Obama and his supporters, the ‘Fast and Furious’ scandal and cover-up is simply not going away.

In fact, for the first time investigators have uncovered E-mails which detail White House involvement in the execution and cover-up of serious crimes.

As a result, Fast and Furious is now in the same league as “Watergate” when it comes to high crimes and misdemeanors.

Impeachable offenses may have been involved.

As reported, in part, at the reference, President Obama and Eric Holder are no longer able to block the inquiry with contrived transfers, demotions, and reorganization tricks:

“The disastrous Obama Administration operation “Fast and Furious”, which deliberately put guns in the hands of the Mexican cartel, exploded this week with new revelations of a cover-up, and emails which tie the scandal directly to the White House for the first time.

“Fast and Furious” was an attempt to intercept gun-trafficking that sent 2,000 guns to cartel operatives via straw buyers. Critics believe that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder saw the program as an opportunity to embarrass U.S.-based gun dealers, and help galvanize support for increased gun-control measures, while controlling where and how the guns would be “walked” across the border. But the operation went horribly wrong as the guns went unaccounted for, leading to the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian A. Terry last December in Arizona, and the deaths of untold others inside Mexico – all using guns provided by the ATF. Holder denied knowledge of the operation at a U.S. House hearing on May 3rd, but subsequent revelations clearly show both Holder and the White House had been informed about this program as it ran off the rails.


Now it has been revealed that after the death of Agent Terry, Assistant U.S. Attorney Emory Hurley and then-U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke colluded to cover-up the fact that Terry was killed using one of the guns from ‘Fast and Furious’. Evidence shows that Hurley – who knew “almost immediately” that the guns could be traced to the program, contacted Burke, and they agreed to cover it up:

In an internal email the day after the murder, Hurley, and then-U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke, decided not to disclose the connection, saying ” … this way we do not divulge our current case (Fast and Furious) or the Border Patrol shooting case.”

As Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) said “The level of involvement of the United States Attorney’s Office … in the genesis and implementation of this case is striking.” Grassley and Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) are investigating the scandal, and AG Holder’s knowledge and role in its implementation.

Grassley’s office on Thursday also revealed that 21 more Fast and Furious guns have been found at violent crime scenes in Mexico. That is up from 11 the agency admitted just last month, and Grassley said he can only imagine the carnage that will be shown to have been made possible by the thousands of guns put into the hands of criminals by the Obama Administration.

Grassley and Issa also Thursday asked Justice for “interviews, emails, memos and even hand-written notes from members of the U.S. attorney’s office” involved with ‘Fast and Furious’. Thus far, Holder’s arrogant department has stonewalled, deceived and provided censored testimony, when it even responds.

And now, for the first time, evidence that the White House – which had denied knowledge of the operation – did in fact know about the scandal. At least three national security officials in the White House were briefed to some extent on the operation:

The supervisor of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives operation in Phoenix specifically mentioned Fast and Furious in at least one email to a White House national security official, and two other White House colleagues were briefed on reports from the supervisor, according to White House emails and a senior administration official.

The White House denies that they were informed of the operation’s “covert investigative tactics”, which sounds an awful lot like parsing to avoid legal jeopardy.

Where is the national media on this? During the Watergate scandal, the nation came to a screeching halt while the media expended unlimited resources exposing the debacle – no detail was too small to be exposed.

With “Fast and Furious”? Crickets. Sure, they’ll mention new details when leaked to them, or notable testimony from a House hearing. But unlike Watergate, the national media will not put dedicated reporters on the trail to dig up the whole story. Even when the Attorney General is caught in a lie – under oath. Even White House is now proven to have been in the loop all along – despite their denials.

And no one was killed from Watergate.

Hey media: do your damn job. If not for us, then do it for him…”

Unfortunately, the liberal media is still mesmerized by the Obama mystique and the “thrill” that The One causes to run up and down the legs of alleged journalists.

That means that the media will most likely be a part of the cover up, rather than an objective seeker of truth.

Still, the US House is in the hands of Republicans who will persist until the question, “What did Obama know and when did he know it?” is answered satisfactorily!

Barack Obama and Erick Holder MUST be held accountable.

Period!

Thanks to Tom Tancredo for publishing this report on his web site.



http://tancredoradio.wordpress.com/2011/09/16/%e2%80%98fast-and-furious%e2%80%99-explodes-brian-terry-cover-up-white-house-emails-revealed/

New Rallying Cry for Unemployed: Will Riot for Jobs!

By John W. Lillpop

Mayor Bloomberg has looked into his crystal ball and he sees deep trouble and dark skies for New York City.

Specifically, New York’s goofy mayor sees riots in the streets if the jobless situation does not improve.

Rather than the usual “Will work for food,” Bloomberg sees the streets cluttered with people carrying signs reading, “Will riot for jobs!”

As reported at the reference:

“Mayor Bloomberg warned Friday there would be riots in the streets if Washington doesn't get serious about generating jobs.

"We have a lot of kids graduating college, can't find jobs," Bloomberg said on his weekly WOR radio show.

"That's what happened in Cairo. That's what happened in Madrid. You don't want those kinds of riots here."

In Cairo, angry Egyptians took out their frustrations by toppling presidential strongman Hosni Mubarak - and more recently attacking the Israeli embassy.

As for Madrid, the most recent street protests were sparked by widespread unhappiness that the Spanish government was spending millions on the visit of Pope Benedict instead of dealing with widespread unemployment.

Bloomberg's unusually alarmist pronouncement came as President Obama has been pressuring reluctant Republicans to pass his proposed job creation plan.

"The damage to a generation that can't find jobs will go on for many, many years," the normally-measured mayor said.

Bloomberg gave Obama kudos for coming up with a jobs plan.”

Kudos to Obama for a jobs plan?

Remember, Obama also spent nearly one trillion dollars on a stimulus that was supposed to create or save millions of jobs. That includes $538 million dollars wasted on Solyndra!

Does Bloomberg really believe that Obama’s latest scheme will be any better?

Based on what?





http://www.nydailynews.com/ny_local/2011/09/16/2011-09-16_mayor_bloomberg_predicts_riots_in_the_streets_if_economy_doesnt_create_more_jobs.html#ixzz1Y9UFKZGn

Tougher Gun Laws Needed to Prevent Government from Engaging in ‘Fast and Furious’ Idiocy?

By John W. Lillpop

How utterly inexplicable that the most liberal, anti-gun administration in American history is under siege for walking guns to Mexico, said guns ending up in the hands of Mexican drug cartels and traced to the death of innocent people including an American Border Patrol Agent.

Despite desperate actions taken by the White House and Erick Holder’s DOJ to sweep the ‘Fast and Furious’ scandal under the rug, the scandal continues to surge relentlessly toward the White House and, perhaps, even the Oval Office.

“What did President Obama know and when did he know it,” is THE QUESTION in Washington these days, asked in reference to both the Fast and Furious scandal AND the Obama-laden Solyndra quagmire.

America is in desperate need of a modern-day Alexander Butterfield, the special assistant to the President who, in 1973, revealed that all conversations in the Oval Office were taped, a revelation that ultimately sent President Nixon back to San Clemente, California in total disgrace.

Is there such a person in the Obama administration who can come forth with credible, irrefutable evidence that will show that Obama had his Marxist hands all over Fast and Furious?

If so, please come forward and tell all. By doing so you may help Save American by expediting the removal of Barack Obama from the presidency.

Further with respect to guns: An American Border Patrol Agent has been murdered, but where in the hell are the protests of rage from Senators Diane Feinstein and Barbara Boxer and other liberals demanding more and tougher gun laws?

And the ultimate question: If Obama’s judgment is so utterly flawed when it comes to guns, does it make sense to leave the nuclear codes in his unsteady hands?