A Possible “Out” for Waterless Citizens of Detroit

A Possible “Out” for Waterless Citizens of Detroit


By John W. Lillpop


As President Obama prepares to ask Congress for $2 billion to fund the “humanitarian crisis” he created at the US Border, another deadly serious humanitarian crisis is confronting citizens of the once-proud American city of Detroit.

As reported in the media, thousands of citizens in Detroit have lost water and sewer services because of inability to pay. This continued misery is a direct result of greedy labor unions and “progressive” solutions gone amuck in the Motor City.

Herewith a possible solution for Detroit’s dilemma:

Parents, send your under-18 children to the US-Mexico border in tattered clothes and fractured Spanish, posing as illegal aliens seeking refugee status.
Make a commitment that both the parents and children will vote Democrat for life, a no-brainer since most Detroit folks already accept that constraint at birth.

Do these things and Barack Obama will make sure that your water and sewer service are restored immediately!

Tough Times for Former Professor of Constitutional Law!

Tough Times for Former Professor of Constitutional Law!

By John W. Lillpop


Last week, the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that Barack Obama acted unconstitutionally when he appointed three commissioners  to the National Labor Relations Board without securing the required approval of the US Senate.

Obama’s parsing of the word “recess” simply did not pass the Supreme smell taste and the President was handed another embarrassing defeat.

Barack’s awful luck, and even worse judgment regarding  constitutional law, carried over to June 30 when the SCOTUS ruled 5-4 against the birth control mandate in Obamacare, as pertains to the rights of closely-held corporations to use religious grounds as a basis for objecting to new requirements.

The June 30 ruling is seen as a significant blow to Obama’s signature achievement, the Affordable Care Act, AKA Obamacare, since said blow may open the flood gates to other legal challenges to the hugely unpopular law.

It also calls into question Obama’s resume as a learned professor of Constitutional law.

Best of all, the ruling represents a powerful starting point in reversing “The Obama Transformation of America,” One SCOTUS ruling at a time!”

Liberal Politics Far More Dangerous Than Global Warming!

By John W. Lillpop


As Barack Obama prepares to ask Congress for $2 billion to fund the “humanitarian crisis” he created at the US Border, and as the Marxist nightmare known as Obamacare continues to erode what was once the best health care system in the world, another humanitarian crisis is being played out in the once -proud American city of Detroit.

As reported:

“Nicole Hill is one of thousands of residents in Detroit who have had their water and sewer services turned off as part of a crackdown on customers who are behind on their bills.
In April, the city set a target of cutting service to 3,000 customers a week who were more than $150 behind on their bills. In May, the water department sent out 46,000 warnings and cut off service to 4,531. The city says that cutting off water is the only way to get people to pay their bills as Detroit tries to emerge from bankruptcy — the utility is currently owed $90 million from customers, and nearly half the city's 300,000 or so accounts are past due.”

Detroit, a ravaged relic of liberal politics gone amuck, where greedy labor unions and “progressive” solutions have solved nothing, while bringing absolute misery to this city and to its citizens.

The disaster that is Detroit makes it obvious that the citizens of Detroit might get more attention by sending their under- 18 children to the US-Mexico border in tattered clothes and fractured Spanish, posing as illegal aliens and seeking refugee status. The only thing required would be a commitment from the parents of the children to vote Democrat for life, a commitment most Detroit folks already accept at birth.

Clearly, in Barack Obama’s muddled mind, illegal aliens are more important than citizens because of the potential to create more Democrats by pandering to illegals.

The Detroit “humanitarian crisis” also proves that liberal policies are far more dangerous to the well being and lives of humans than any real or imagined danger from global warming!  


http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-detroit-water-20140629-story.html#page=1

ONLY in World Cup Soccer: US Held Scoreless, Loses Game, Still ADVANCES!

By John W. Lillpop

Adding to the image of World Cup soccer as a jocular assault on the manly enterprise of competitive sports, Team USA had the dubious distinction of advancing in World Cup hostilities without so much as even scoring a goal in a well-deserved loss to Team Germany, whose ruffians only managed a single score themselves.

As reported at the reference:

No dramatic late goals in this one. Not even a win. But despite a 1-0 loss to Germany, the United States was good enough to advance to the knockout stage of consecutive World Cups for the first time and good enough to hold onto the national attention that soccer has finally grabbed in America.

‘‘I'm getting e-mails from people who work at companies where the executives have called a three-hour break and put on giant screens,’’ US Soccer Federation president Sunil Gulati said. ‘‘All of this . . . is pretty extraordinary, and that will build for the next few days.’’

Mind you, as a red-blooded, patriotic, addicted sports nut, I naturally want the Americans to win! ALWAYS!

After all, we ARE Number 1, despite the last six years of leading from behind and surrender policies from Barack Obama!

Overall, the performance by Team USA in Brazil is hugely embarrassing. Indeed, ADVANCING without even scoring adds to the farcical nature of World Cup Soccer!

Just what is the bloody point of getting all exercised about  “advancing” when your guys have just been defeated in a bleeping  shutout?

Better to admit that soccer, World Cup included, is more suitable for communists and third-world heathens than for capitalistic, freedom-loving Americans who favor football and other respectable contact sports!

Besides, who really gives a roaring freak if Germany has a better soccer team than the U.S.?

Let them have the World Cup, and all of its dubious glories.

We Americans prefer non-stop scoring mixed among the sights and sounds of broken bones and crushed skulls, standard fare on any given Sunday at any NFL game.

It’s the American way!

Hillary: Congenital Liar, or Innocent Victim of Vast Right Wing Conspiracy?

By John W. Lillpop


From the archives of days long since ended when free speech was still practiced openly, the late columnist William Safire started a political fire storm by accusing Hillary Clinton, at the time functioning as the self-anointed co-president of the United States, of being a “congenital liar."

As expected, Safire's column did not set particularly well with then-President Bill Clinton, whom threatened to punch Safire on the nose, were if not for the fact that he (Bill Clinton, AKA Slick Willie) was the elected half of the manacled duo.

Other Clintonistas rushed to Hillary's defense by objecting to the word "congenital," which means inherited or a medical condition existing at birth. Egged on by Hillary herself, defenders pointed out that Hillary's estrangement from truth did not commence until after she was introduced to, and paired with, Slick Willie.

Slick Willie called that a "damnable lie" and threatened to punch Hillary on the nose, were it not for the fact that it was Easter Sunday and he had an urgent appointment in the Oral Office with a chubby intern named Monica Lewinsky.

This rancid page from American history springs up because  Hillary Clinton is now seen as a formidable candidate for the US presidency in 2016.

With Hillary’s sights set so high, it is crucial that she  be fully vetted, a function normally carried out by the mainstream media, except when the candidate is a radical leftist Democrat and personal favorite of biased reporters and editors.

As was the case of Barack Obama and just about everyone  running with a D affixed to his or her name.

But more about Hillary.

When it comes to veracity, or lack thereof, we must not  forget that, in the brutal street war waged for the Democrat presidential nomination in 2008, Hillary once boasted that she was made battle tough and ready for any 3 am call on the Red Phone--- as a result of ducking sniper fire while on a mission in Bosnia for hubby President Clinton.

Unfortunately for the "inevitability queen," a CBS reporter, who had accompanied Hillary on her Bosnia trip in 1996, unearthed a clip of video that totally debunked her "dodging sniper fire" campaign rhetoric.

As reported:

"As has now been conclusively established by video film and news photographs, Hillary Clinton did NOT come under sniper fire in Bosnia in March 1996 when she made a morale-boosting visit to U.S. troops enforcing the 1995 Dayton Peace Agreement. But she is taking plenty of bullets for her over-dramatic accounts of the trip, and acknowledged on Monday that she had made a "misstatement." She said it should be treated as a "minor blip."

From that same report, this, in part:

"U.S. Air Force journalist Don Jackson was standing on the back of a flatbed pick-up truck filming the event when Clinton's plane touched down. Here is his account: 

Mrs. Clinton arrived to a flight line full of well-wishers, both military and civilian, accompanied by her staff as well as comedian Sinbad and singer Sheryl Crow who were there to entertain troops. 

To set the record straight, there was no enemy fire, and no imminent danger. If there had been any danger, "well-wishers" would not have been allowed on the tarmac, much less allowing me to stand above everyone else on the back of a truck. 

And Sinbad and Sheryl Crow would've been running for their lives instead of taking the time to be interviewed by yours truly, on the tarmac. Mrs. Clinton's [claim] is a lie, plain and simple."

Bottom line: When it comes to the raw truth, Hillary Clinton appears to be uniquely unqualified to critique anyone's "reliability as a source of information!"

In other words, as William Safire stated so succinctly and flawlessly, Hillary is a “Congenital Liar”.

What If John Boehner’s Gambit Backfires?

By John W. Lillpop


Speaker John Boehner’s exquisite plan to sue Barack Obama for “failing to faithfully execute the law,” may help jar the Congress, the media, the American people, and even Obama himself out of the doldrums of summer,  the season when even electricity moves slower, or so it seems.

Boehner’s pursuit of political theater is not, however, without risk. Plenty.

For example, what if the judicial authority deciding the issue inexplicably sides with Obama? 

Perish the thought, but what would be left of America if Obama was granted unilateral power to do whatever he wished, and to Hades with Congress?

Should such an awful travesty occur, how long would it take The One to:

Declare the Constitution unconstitutional?

Eliminate both chambers of Congress?

Confiscate all firearms in the possession of private citizens?

Put the EPA in charge of the US economy?

Make abortion a free, on-demand service available to all “with child” women, especially white Christian Republicans?

Declare all borders between America and Mexico “null and void”?

Chilling thoughts to be sure!

But Boehner must be 100% sure of winning before risking even further decimation of America at the hands of Barack Obama!

In Search of “Gently Used” Knickers & Future Democrats at the Border!

By John W. Lillpop


The “humanitarian crisis” staged by Barack Obama and the Democrat Party at the border has resulted in some rather curious headline stories--- just in time for those lazy, hazy, crazy days of summer.

For starters, the Department of Homeland Security has issued an urgent solicitation “seeking thousands of pairs of White 100% Cotton Men’s Briefs – ranging from medium sizes to hundreds of 6X-large pairs – to meet the basic clothing needs of thousands of immigrants detained by Immigration & Customs Enforcement” as a result of the latest invasions from Central America.

As if the Great Knickers shortfall is not bad enough, young illegals will be forced to contend with America’s leading congressional imbecile & dim wit, the one and only(thank God!) Nancy Pelosi, Democrat of San Francisco notoriety and the least popular of all Congressional critters with the American people.

As reported at reference 1,

“House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi will travel to the southern border of the U.S. on Saturday to be briefed by Customs and Border Protection on the flood of unaccompanied minors entering the country.
The California Democrat will also meet with a group of children held at the South Texas Detention Facility.”

Although the purpose of Pelosi’s border haunt is not clear, it seems a safe bet that the addle-brained Pelosi will try to “brief” the young illegals on the many entitlements owed them by American taxpayers, including free legal services to demand immediate amnesty and full citizenship!

While Nanny Pelosi “works the children” to undermine US sovereignty, the rule of law, and American culture at the border, intelligent Americans are appealing directly to American citizens for help in dealing with the Great Knickers mess.

As reported at Reference 2:

“Americans for Legal Immigration PAC (ALIPAC), is calling on Americans to mail their “gently used underwear” to President Barack Obama and House Speaker John Boehner in response to a government request for new briefs for the recent surge of illegal immigrants being held by border patrol.

“Obama and Boehner have proven once and for all that their talk of passing immigration reform amnesty, instead of enforcing America’s existing border and immigration laws, only brings more unwanted and destructive illegal immigration!” said William Gheen, president of ALIPAC, on the group’s web site.
“Instead of using our tax money to buy illegals 42,000 pairs of new underwear, we would like to send the illegals and DC politicians a message by mailing them our used underwear, and some of our pairs are in really bad shape due to the bad economy and all of the jobs illegal immigrants are taking from Americans.” 

Pity the poor illegals!

On the one hand they will receive used, “in really bad shape” knickers, and on the other they will receive advice and counsel from the tragically- flawed Nancy Pelosi!

All the more reason for Central American parents to show their “love” by preventing their children from invading the US!


Reference 1

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/06/nancy-pelosi-border-detained-minors-108371.html#ixzz35qIKGyyc

Reference 2

http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/06/26/anti-amnesty-group-asks-americans-to-mail-gently-used-underwear-to-obama-boehner/

Lax Immigration Enforcement Part of Obama Scheme to “Fundamentally Transform” America?

By John W. Lillpop



Responsible citizens of this great nation, regardless of race, ethnicity, religion, or political persuasion, have an urgent responsibility to view Barack Obama’s refusal to enforce US borders and immigration laws with the utmost skepticism, angst, and trepidation.  

At stake is the very sovereignty of the United States and the individual liberties & freedoms which accrue to citizens.

The question that must be answered, objectively, but passionately, is:

Is Barack Obama scheming to “fundamentally transform America” through brazen acceptance and promotion of illegal immigration?

A University of California professor answers the question in the affirmative as reported:

University of California Professor Darrell Y. Hamamoto warns that the influx of illegal immigrants into the United States is part of a plan to create a new underclass of people who can be re-educated in order to create a subservient underclass.
Hamamoto, a Professor of Asian American Studies at the University of California, Davis, exclusively contacted Infowars to express his shock at what he sees as a clear “plan to destroy national sovereignty” through mass uncontrolled illegal immigration.
Hamamoto warns that the influx of illegal immigrants into the U.S. and by extension into the college education system is part of a deliberate plot, “to exclude the American middle class from a UC education and create a new demographic of largely immigrant or foreign national undergraduate population that can be re-educated from the ground up and controlled much more readily.”

Hamamoto’s warning is noteworthy given his position at one of the most liberal institutions in the United States. The professor acknowledged that his vocal stance against illegal immigration has already prompted a backlash, but that he had no reservations in going public.

“I am fairly certain that this is also going on at UT and other “public” institutions of higher learning, so Infowars subscribers will “get it,” wrote Hamamoto. “Everyone else will be really pissed off at me….I am already being harassed by the administration and informed on by trained student-rats, so truly this is not a risk for me.”

The professor added that UC Davis, “is gearing up for what they call the “Hispanization” of the University of California, which means in-state or full-ride tuition to both illegals and the offspring of illegal immigrants.”

Seeking to draw more attention to the issue, Hamamoto is preparing to launch a stunt based around, “a campaign calling for racial “equality” by demanding that thirty million Asians of different nationalities (be) brought into the USA and integrated into the National Security Welfare State.”

Making reference to this week’s controversy surrounding the DHS’ purchase of 42,000 pairs of extra large underwear that are needed to clothe an influx of overweight illegal immigrants, Hamamoto writes, “One of my purposely ludicrous arguments will be that the US govt. will save hundreds of thousands of dollars buying XS-size underwear for Asians as opposed to XXXXXXL-size drawers for illegal immigrants from Central America.”

“La Raza, MeCha, and all the other ethno-nationalist interest groups will really get their pantalones in a bunch thanks to this campaign. This plan to destroy national sovereignty cannot be argued through rational means, so I will orchestrate a complete parody of this bogus crisis,” writes Hamamoto.”

Professor Hamamoto’s words must be heeded as precious pearls of wisdom!


Reference https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71

Whither “Love” of Parents for Juvenile Illegals, Jeb Bush?

By John W. Lillpop


As reported at the reference, Republican Jeb Bush said the following, in part, about those who come to America illegally:

“Yes, they broke the law, but it’s not a felony. It’s an act of love. It’s an act of commitment to your family. I honestly think that that is a different kind of crime that there should be a price paid, but it shouldn’t rile people up that people are actually coming to this country to provide for their families."

So, perhaps Bush can explain the whereabouts of that “love” when it comes to the parents of thousands of children(some as young as two!) that have stormed US borders and created a horrific “humanitarian crisis”?

The reality is that coming to America illegally is a deadly serious and dangerous venture, even for mature adults.

For defenseless children, illegal migration can lead to death or serious injury, being victimized by sex trafficking, exploitation by Mexican drug cartels, and other heinous crimes at the hands of unsavory thugs who have no regard for the lives or well being of innocent children.

Allowing, or even encouraging, young children to assume the risks of coming to the US illegally portends a complete lack of common sense and anything but “Love.”

By foolishly trying to sugar-coat illegal immigration as an act of “Love,” Jeb Bush has demonstrated his own lack of common sense and perhaps fatal weakness as a possible presidential candidate in 2016.


 http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/2014/04/whats-love-gotta-jeb-bush-says-illegal-immigrants-come-act-love/#5HRvadyHjvqmthVI.99

Passing Amnesty Would Be De Facto Approval of Obama’s Evil Plan to Transform America!

By John W. Lillpop


Many Congressional Republicans-in-Name Only(RINOs) have effectively straddled the fence on amnesty by suggesting that support could be forthcoming when, and if, Barack Obama proved to be trustworthy with regard to border security and law enforcement.

Silly boys and girls!  After nearly six years of anti-rule of law defiance by The One, why would anyone give Obama the even the slightest benefit of the doubt?

True to from, over the past several weeks, Barack Obama has proved beyond any reasonable doubt that he holds both border security and implementation of law in utter contempt and has absolutely no intention of embracing either.

Simply put, Barack Obama sees every illegal alien as a future Democrat and socialist parasite who will ALWAYS vote Democratic, regardless of unemployment, budget deficits, or other dire economic situations confronting the nation and its citizens.

Even more distressing is the fact that the Obama administration most likely knew that the current border mayhem was about to explode, and had actually advertised for illegal alien escorts back in January.

As reported at the reference:

The current surge of unaccompanied minors coming into this country was a completely planned event by Obama and now we have the proof.
DHS posted an advertisement for bids from vendors to handle 65,000 “Unaccompanied Alien Children“ on their fbo.gov website on January 29th of this year.
How could the government know back in January that there would be 65,000 unaccompanied children coming in when the most any previous year ever saw 5,000?
Just look some of the specifics:
[...] The Contractor shall provide unarmed escort staff, including management, supervision, manpower, training, certifications, licenses, drug testing, equipment, and supplies necessary to provide on-demand escort services for non-criminal/non-delinquent unaccompanied alien children ages infant to 17 years of age, seven (7) days a week, 365 days a year. Transport will be required for either category of UAC or individual juveniles, to include both male and female juveniles. There will be approximately 65,000 UAC in total: 25% local ground transport, 25% via ICE charter and 50% via commercial air.

         [...] In addition, the Contractor shall have personnel who are able to communicate with                      juveniles in their own designated language(s).

Not only are these kids bringing in all kinds of diseases, creating a huge health crisis, but they are being scattered all over the US. And, ICE admittedly released 68,000 convicted criminal illegals onto our streets last year.”

Given these facts, it is high time for RINOs to wake up and smell the stench of anti-American hatred emanating from the White House!

For the sake of America and future generations, the likes of Jeb Bush, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul, John Boehner, Eric Cantor, John McCain, and other RINOs must face the fact that  Barack Obama is committed to  “Fundamentally transforming America,” to suit his Marxist agenda, and will gladly dispense with American language, culture, and tradition as needed to reach his dastardly goals.

Barack Obama cannot, and never will be, relied on to do the “right thing” when it comes to the interests of American citizens!

Passing Amnesty Would Be De Facto Approval of Obama’s grand scheme to destroy America as we know it! 


Reference 1:

http://republicbroadcasting.org/proof-obama-planned-to-flood-us-with-illegal-minors/

Is “Indian Summer” Racist?

By John W. Lillpop



Democrats, in a desperate search for an issue(s) with which to mislead and fool low-information voters (yet again!), have joined forces with under-worked/over paid non-essential government bureaucrats in dealing with a major “pressing” issue of our times:

That would be: Is the name “Red Skins,” as applied to the alleged football team in Washington, D.C., sufficiently offensive to warrant a Constitutional Convention, or passage of a Constitutional Amendment, or are even more draconian measures called for?

Perhaps a second civil war should be waged to settle the debate with blood, once and for all?

Or perhaps President Obama should simply issue an Executive Order to forever ban the racist affront to native Americans?

The issue is of particular interest to those of us who live in California and whom have grown accustomed to a unique weather phenomenon that occurs each year as the traditional summer season winds down.

In September, October, and even as late as November, California has what is indelicately referred to as “Indian Summer,”  a term that refers to the final blast of hot, dry weather for the year.

To the best of my knowledge, Indian Summer has no racist connotation, nor is the term meant as a derogatory slam against Native Americans, or even summer for that matter.

Still, in the politically correct mental asylum otherwise known as San Francisco, there are countless liberals who cannot sleep at night because of neurotic concerns that “Indian Summer” is divisive, non-inclusive, un-American, and most especially, “NOT San Francisco.”

Of course, these are the same mainstream malcontents who think that the American flag, U.S. military, heterosexual marriage, Christianity, the pro-life movement, traditional family values, and all Republicans are “NOT  San Francisco.”

For the record, being designated “NOT San Francisco” can be a source of enormous comfort and gratitude for conservative thinkers!

Besides being completely harmless, Indian Summer is much easier to spell and pronounce than, say, “Indigenous People Summer,” or “Native American Summer.” But logic and common sense are almost never obstacles to San Francisco liberals intent on amusing the rest of the planet with PC absurdities.

And that is why locals are also looking into an alternative name for the San Francisco Giants, thought by some to be an insensitive slur aimed at big and tall minority men.

In addition, anyone caught uttering “Illegal Alien” in public may soon face a fine, or be forced to spend a weekend in The City with Nancy Pelosi.

Referring to smelly, unkempt beggars with all their worldly possessions in a shopping cart as “Homeless” may soon be codified as a major felony in San Francisco. The preferred term is “Displaced Victim of the Inherited Bush Recession.”

Most Bay Area conservatives are unbowed by the PC craze. Many have  plans to take in a ballgame between the Giants and the Red Legs of Cincinnati, or the Cleveland Indians and the Chicago White Sox. Most will root for the White Sox, not because of white bigotry, but because the Sox win!

Conservatives are notorious front-runners, you see!

Here is wishing you and yours a most pleasant and prosperous Indian Summer!

Pope Francis “Ex-Communicates” Mafia: What About Nancy Pelosi, Your Holiness?

By John W. Lillpop

As reported at Reference 1, Pope Francis took on Mafia  thugs whom the Pontiff termed an example of, “the adoration of evil”:

Pope Francis on Saturday took on one of Italy's most dangerous organized crime groups, calling it an example of "the adoration of evil" and saying Mafiosi "are excommunicated".

"Those who in their lives follow this path of evil, as mafiosi do, are not in communion with God. They are excommunicated," Pope Francis said in impromptu comments at a mass before tens of thousands of people.

He told the crowd: "This evil must be fought against, it must be pushed aside. We must say no to it."


While the Pope is to be commended for flexing his righteous ex-communication powers against the Mafia, one cannot help but wonder if the Pontiff will use those same Godly powers to isolate the likes of Nancy Pelosi, San Francisco politician and Catholic poser, based on the fact that Pelosi is an unrepentant Democrat who recently characterized abortion as “sacred ground.”

Pelosi further distanced herself from Church core beliefs when she audaciously and publicly advised Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone to skip the March for Marriage in Washington, D.C. on June 18.

As reported at reference 2:

San Francisco politicians got more than they bargained for when they tried to demonize pro-marriage supporters and pressure Archbishop Salvatore Cordileone to bow out of today’s March for Marriage in Washington, DC. 

Instead of cowering in fear, Cordileone—who rallied voters to pass Prop. 8, California’s definition of marriage referendum—explained what marriage is, corrected their false accusations and held them up to their own standard: “Before you judge us, get to know us.”

Rep. Nancy Pelosi led the lobbying to pressure San Francisco’s top Catholic leader. The small group of local politicians and homosexual advocates sent a letter to Cordileone attempting to smear marriage supporters—a tactic outlined in the homosexual strategy book “After the Ball.”

Cordileone heads the U.S. Catholic Bishops’ work to defend marriage—and the accusers gave him a prime opportunity to model how to defend marriage from the vicious methods of pro-homosexual activists.”

Thus, on two vitally important spiritual and moral issues, Nancy Pelosi continues to advocate positions that are in direct conflict with church teachings, and which send the worst possible message to Catholics and non Catholics alike.

Nancy Pelosi richly deserves to be ex-communicated from the Church!

Ref 1:
http://news.yahoo.com/mafiosi-excommunicated-pope-says-151122053.html;_ylt=AwrBJR_AsaVTY1QAwG7QtDMD

http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/63946

Harry Reid, “This War Is Lost” Crock Finally Vindicated?

By John W. Lillpop


During a press conference on April 19, 2007, Senator Harry Reid(D-NV), issued the following statement, in part:

REID: This war(Iraq) is lost, and the surge is not accomplishing anything. 

Finally, after six years of mismanagement, retreat, and surrender at the behest of Barack Obama, the bitter truth is undeniable: The war in Iraq HAS been lost, mostly due to defensive indifference.

Along the way, 4,500 American lives were lost, thousands of disabling injuries suffered, and the national treasury relieved of at least $1 trillion green backs.

It took six years, but “dumb” decisions by Barack Obama have made the dingy Democrat from Nevada appear prophetic.

Time to celebrate your “I told you so,” moment in the dark, Senator?

Is Gender Enough to Qualify Hillary Clinton for the Presidency?

By John W. Lillpop



If Barack Obama has taught we the people anything, it is this:  Electing a president based on anything but raw ability, qualifications, and relevant experience will most likely result in electoral folly and chaos!

Six years ago, the American people sought to soothe more than 200 years of cumulative guilt and shame by electing the first African-American to the Presidency. To all but the most partisan voter, Barack Obama was obviously a naïve, inexperienced, community organizer with no discernable record of achievement to his credit.

In truth, Obama’s outstanding credentials were only that he was “clean and articulate,” and did not have a “Negro dialect.”

Other than the race factor, Barack Obama was literally indistinguishable, hardly the sort of leader the nation desperately needed after eight years of George W. Bush.

Still, the American people elected, and reelected, Obama despite devastating unemployment, uncontrolled spending and record deficits, untenable scandals, dismal and failed foreign policies throughout the world, deteriorating racial relations among Americans, and a general decline in the American brand.

In other words, Barack Hussein Obama is living proof that charm and charisma alone cannot overcome fundamental defects in the areas of character, intellect, judgment, morality, and leadership!

With our blessed nation in utter shambles, from coast to coast, thanks to the Obama experiment, we the people are facing yet another crucial presidential election in 2016, in which the Democrat Party will likely once again nominate a presidential candidate based on something other than raw ability, qualifications, and relevant experience.

The likely candidate is Hillary Rodham Clinton, and the “something other” is her gender!

The burning question: After the dismal presidency of Barack Obama, will the American people make the mistake of electing Hillary Clinton based on her gender, rather than legitimate qualifications?

Obama Succumbs to “Endless War” Mentality!

By John W. Lillpop


Barack Obama won the US presidency, in no small measure, by being a  severe critic of the “Endless war” mentality of  President George W. Bush, particularly Bush’s engagement in what Obama termed the “dumb war” of Iraq.

Obama sought to change all that with his policy of surrender and withdrawal, which led to the fulfillment of his campaign promise to “bring the troops home.”

Unfortunately, Obama’s ill-advised retreat, which was opposed by many of his military experts, has back fired, leaving Iraq and the middle-east ablaze in a new civil war which threatens to consume Baghdad with the ravages of Jihad overflowing from Syria.

Finally, after several days of thoughtful deliberation mixed in with much needed golf, The One has decided: Back to Baghdad for ground troops! 

As reported:

“President Barack Obama is notifying Congress that about 275 U.S. military personnel could deploy to Iraq.
Obama says the forces are going to provide support and security for U.S. personnel and the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad. He says the forces are equipped for combat and will remain in Iraq until the security situation becomes such that they are no longer needed.
About 160 troops are already in Iraq, including 50 Marines and more than 100 Army soldiers. Some of those soldiers have only recently arrived.
Under the authorization Obama outlined, a U.S. official says the U.S. will put an additional 100 soldiers in a nearby third country where they would be held in reserve until needed.
The White House says the U.S. military personnel are entering Iraq with its consent.”

Perhaps W’s “dumb” war was not so dumb after all?

Obama Refusal to Face Reality Represents “Real and Present” Danger to America

By John W. Lillpop


Barack Obama holds many beliefs which are contrary to what most Americans believe and to the best interests of our Democracy and people.

His resolute refusal to accept Islam as a major purveyor of evil in the world has led to a series of crucial setbacks, from his foolish policies regarding Libya; Muslim Brotherhood gangsters in Egypt; the vile slaughter of four American diplomats at Benghazi; needless procrastination followed by wretchedly inept judgment in Syria; release of Taliban terrorists from GITMO in exchange for an American military deserter; and, now, the surrender and subsequent decimation of Iraq.

During his helter skelter time in office, Obama has: Declared the war on terror over; forced government agencies to avoid commentary and language critical of Islam; during the 2012  presidential campaign, described Al-Quaeda as ‘decimated’; and, has consistently harassed and failed to uphold the State of Israel.

Stated in the most blunt language possible: Barack Obama seems to own a personal and deep affection for Islam, a condition that renders him unfit for service in a world dominated by Islamic violence.

Barack Obama’s refusal to accept the truth represents a “real and present” danger to America!

Don’t Forget to Remember Democrats Who Lied About the War in Iraq!

By John W. Lillpop


Now that Barack Obama’s “great achievement” in Iraq has joined Obamacare, the jobless recovery, a plethora of domestic scandals involving impeachable- caliber high crimes and misdemeanors, foreign policy foibles in Libya, Syria, Afghanistan, and Russia, as indelible scars on the proud history of American culture and Exceptionalism, liberal spin doctors working at the White House have been placed on 24-hour, seven day a week schedules until such time as a reasonable argument has been crafted to explain why, under the command of the alleged smartest man in the universe, America is being humiliated by events spiraling out of control near Baghdad.

ISIS is the acronym to which the world is demanding answers.

Code named the “Fog of Diplomacy,”  this White House rush project is all about setting the record straight on Iraq and, whether true or not, clearing Barack Obama of any and all responsibility.

The spin doctor narrative will be:

George W. Bush lied to Congress and the world about non-existent weapons of mass destruction, thereby needlessly spilling the blood of 4,500 US soldiers and wasting trillions of US treasury chasing ghost weapons in the sands of Iraq.

However, the spin docs will need to confront the following truth: If Bush Lied About WMD, So Did These Democrats!

Indeed, when the question of using military force against Iraq was put before the U.S. Congress, 110 Democrats supported the 2002 Joint Resolution, which authorized President Bush to act as he ultimately did.

Further, some very outspoken Democrats during that time said these sort of things including President Clinton, Vice President Al Gore, and Senator John F. Kerry.


“[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.”—From a letter signed by Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, & John Kerry among others on October 9, 1998

“This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”—From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others

“Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to permit monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections; Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological capabilities, and has made positive progress toward developing nuclear weapons capabilities”—From a joint resolution submitted by Tom Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002

“Saddam’s goal … is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed.”—Madeline Albright, 1998

“(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983”—National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

“Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement.”—Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability.”—Robert Byrd, October 2002

“There’s no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat… Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He’s had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001… He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn’t have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we.”—Wesley Clark on September 26, 2002

“The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow.”—Bill Clinton in 1998

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.”—Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

“Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people.”—Tom Daschle in 1998

“Saddam Hussein’s regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal.”—John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.”—John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“I share the administration’s goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction.”—Dick Gephardt in September of 2002

“Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”—Al Gore, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.”—Bob Graham, December 2002

“Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction.”—Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”—Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

“There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein’s regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed.”—Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002

“I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force – if necessary – to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”—John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

“The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation.”—John Kerry, October 9, 2002

“(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. …And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War.”—John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003

“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.”—Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002

“Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States.”—Joe Lieberman, August, 2002

“Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. During 1991 – 1994, despite Iraq’s denials, United Nations inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons. Inspectors have said that Iraq’s claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction.”—Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

“As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”—Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

“Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production.”—Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources—something that is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”—John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

“Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both against Iraq’s enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East.”—John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

“Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts.”—Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002.

And from our favorite Frenchman, this:

“What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad’s regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs.”—Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

As the record clearly shows, if George W. Bush lied about WMD, he was joined by a lot of lying Democrats!

Outlaw President Calls for Increased “Infringement” of 2nd Amendment!

By John W. Lillpop


Never in the history of these United States has the good office of the President been occupied by such an ego-maniacal, class-less hypocrite as Barack Obama.

To Obama, the law is not a hard and fast. Rather, law is more or less optional, depending on his political ideology on any particular issue.

For instance, when it comes to federal immigration laws enacted by Congress and codified into law by the signature of the President, Obama places a much greater priority on growing the Democrat Party through appeasement, pandering, and coddling of invading illegal aliens whom, as Obama knows all too well, can nearly always be counted on to vote Democrat.

Conversely, Obama holds the 2nd Amendment and the entire issue of gun ownership in utter contempt,  and is an unapologetic and insanely aggressive advocate of “infringing” on gun rights at every opportunity, the Constitution and 2nd Amendment thereto notwithstanding.

Obama’s confounding views defy logic and common sense.

It’s as though his words are word-smithed on an alien planet, thousands of light-years from earth, and blithely beamed back to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue without vetting, or even the most fundamental verification.

An example is Obama’s latest rage concerning gun violence. As reported#:

Despite virtually no legislation on gun control and little hope for a breakthrough, President Obama made clear this week he still sees the issue as a top priority in his second term, publicly chastising lawmakers and gun-rights advocates and telling them they “should be ashamed” of U.S. firearms laws.
The passionate statements — delivered unexpectedly as Mr. Obama was discussing the cost of college with Tumblr founder David Karp on Tuesday — underscore how much political capital the president is willing to invest in the issue. He even called the failure to pass gun legislation the biggest frustration of his presidency thus far.
But by his own admission, any restrictions on guns have little or no shot of becoming law in the current environment, despite the best efforts of Mr. Obama’s allies in Congress.
Underscoring the intense resistance to any gun-control measure, the president’s statements Tuesday — in which he praised Australia for banning virtually all long-barrel weapons — quickly became fodder for pro-Second Amendment groups.
 “Our levels of gun violence are off the charts. There’s no other advanced, developed country on earth that would put up with this,” he said Tuesday. “And most members of Congress — and I have to say, to some degree this is bipartisan — are terrified of the NRA.”

Clearly, when it comes to 2nd Amendment rights, Barack Obama is the self-appointed “Infringer-in-chief.”

Has it ever occurred to Obama that his sanctimonious demands for tough new gun laws are essentially ignored by Congress and the public, largely due to the fact that Obama refuses to acknowledge, much less enforce, existing rule of law when it comes to borders and immigration?

How in the world can any reasonably sane person stand before the American people and openly declare that he, as the chief law enforcement authority in the nation, will unilaterally ignore and defy existing law and the will of Congress when it comes to prosecution of invading aliens, while, in the very same breathe, chastising law makers for not passing laws that would “infringe” on the 2nd Amendment rights of  American citizens?

Furthermore, Mr. President, what other “advanced, developed country on earth” would put up with the government-sponsored invasion of its sovereign soil by tens of millions of invading foreign criminals whom, if granted amnesty, would alter the political, cultural, social, and economic norms of the most successful human society in history, possibly forever?

Indeed, Mr. President,NOT ONE of the nations currently “dumping” thousands of illegal alien juveniles on the backs of American taxpayers would tolerate such disrespect and violation of its own sovereignty!

Why, then, does America continue to tolerate the devastation wreaked on our way of life by the unlawful invasion of US soil from south of our borders?

Two despicable words explain the cowardly capitulation of American authority to the sewers of the third-world: Barack Obama!


# http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/10/obama-says-america-should-be-ashamed-its-gun-laws/#ixzz34PMUEfFx

Mosul Falls to Jihad: Another Foreign Policy “Victory” for The One?

By John W. Lillpop

As the traitorous surrender of American sovereignty, culture and soil to juvenile invaders from south of our borders continues under Barack Obama’s insane “immigration policy,” the disastrous effects of the Obama Presidency were also being realized 8,000 miles away.

As reported:

Islamic militants overran parts of Iraq's second-largest city of Mosul on Tuesday, driving security forces from their posts and seizing the provincial government headquarters, security bases and other key buildings.
Gunmen cruised through neighborhoods, waving black banners while residents fled.
Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki pressed parliament to declare a state of emergency.
The fight for Mosul was a heavy defeat in Baghdad's battle against a widening insurgency by a breakaway al Qaeda group, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, which has been trying - with some success - to seize territory both in Iraq and neighboring Syria.

Earlier this year, the group captured another Iraqi city, Fallujah, in the west of the country, and government forces have been unable to take it back after months of fighting.  

The far larger Mosul is an even more strategic prize. The city and surrounding Ninevah province are a major export route for Iraqi oil and a gateway to Syria.”

Lest we forget, nearly 4,500 American lives were lost in Iraq.

Sadly, Obama’s subsequent actions  render those precious American lives meaningless exercises in futility as America’s brilliant community organizer pivoted away from the “dumb” war that is now consuming the middle east.

Another foreign policy “victory,” Mr. Obama?

Adios, Eric Cantor!

By John W. Lillpop


Perhaps NOW the GOP establishment will listen?

Startling news from Virginia!  Eric Cantor, GOP Majority Leader in the US House, will spend the rest of his summer looking for a job!

That’s right: Eric Cantor, the RINO renegade who chose to join outlaw President Barack Obama in attempting to cede  the sovereignty, culture, history, and future of these great United States to foreign invaders intent on transforming America into a socialist nanny-state, HAS BEEN DEFEATED in his primary election!

Repeat: Eric Cantor will NOT be a candidate for the US House in November!

Listen up, Jeb Bush, Mitch McConnell, John Boehner, Karl Rove, and all the rest of you RINO renegades: America is NOT FOR SALE to establishment politicians who do have lost their love for America!

The cherished American principles of free-market capitalism, conservative traditional values, American sovereignty,  and the like will not be sacrificed on the altar of political expediency to people like Barack Obama and arrogant RINOs whom do not respect the rule of law, the US Constitution, and the American way.

Amnesty would be an unlawful political coup.

We will not stand for it!

Don’t Cry for Argentina---or Hillary & Bill Clinton!

By John W. Lillpop

In one of the most outrageous political scams to prey on the sympathies of voters will big hearts, but incredibly small, dysfunctional brains, multi-millionaire and congenital liar Hillary Rodham Clinton, a lifelong Democrat, resorted to passing out crying towels while being interviewed by ABC News.

The former first lady made the following remarks in the  interview that aired Monday.

"We came out of the White House not only dead broke, but in debt," Clinton told ABC News. "We had no money when we got there, and we struggled to, you know, piece together the resources for mortgages, for houses, for Chelsea's education. You know, it was not easy."


Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! Poor baby!

The disadvantaged former first lady and her tramp husband/ former President were forced into abject poverty as a result of Bill Clinton’s inability to curb his voracious appetite for sexual harassment of young female underlings; said abuses taking place whilst Slick held executive power in the Arkansas governor’s mansion, and in that secluded back room off the Oval Office at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, which made the name Monica Lewinsky synonymous  with sin.

Sexual harassment can be a very costly transgression as Bill and Hillary Clinton learned first-hand when they wrote out a check for $850,000 to Paula Jones in exchange for her agreement to drop a sexual harassment lawsuit against the Slick One.

The Clintons, though, did all right for themselves, and quickly -- Bill Clinton almost immediately hit the speaking circuit, making millions along the way.

By 2009, when Hillary Clinton was preparing to join President Obama's administration as secretary of State, the Clintons' wealth was somewhere between $10 million and $50 million.

But perhaps Hillary has a point: Perhaps the White House is too tough on elder adults approaching their 70th birthdays?

Therefore, Hillary, may we suggest that you shelter yourself and Slick from another round of abuse at the White House?

Just say NO to 2016, Hillary, and all will be forgotten!

Obama’s Progressive Insanity: Lawyers, Not Marines, to Deal with Border Crisis!

By John W. Lillpop

The saga of Barack Obama versus the Constitution, the rule of law, the US Congress, and 330 million more or less normal Americans continues to grow more bizarre and surreal with each passing day, fueled by Obama’s head-first descent into the abyss of emotional and mental insolvency.

In terms of legacy, the only remaining question concerning Barack Hussein Obama is:  Will the 44th US President be impeached and removed from office for high crimes and misdemeanors? Or, will he be declared unfit, mentally and/or emotionally, and removed pursuant to the 25th Amendment?

Either way, Obama’s severally- diminished capacity will surely continue to haunt the lives of all good people, benefiting only murderous GITMO terrorists released in exchange for treasonous US military deserters, AND immigration chaos as Obama- favored non-English speaking illegal aliens are welcomed to conquer America and remake same in the image of Che Guevara.

Pundits of all political persuasions were still gasping in amazement at the Obama decision to free five Taliban killers for un-American loser Bowe Bergdahl when The One decided to deal with the “urgent humanitarian crisis” at the border, a crisis created solely by and for Obama himself, by sending lawyers, rather than Marines, to the border.

With American sovereignty, culture, and homeland security on the line, why did this president elect to send lawyers rather than Marines to deal with thousands of invading juveniles?

Chalk it up to another instance of Obama taking care to milk every possible disadvantage to the US out of a choreographed crisis.

Or, more bluntly, progressive insanity, on steroids!

Sit Down and SHUT UP, Eric Cantor!

By John W. Lillpop


As Barack Obama continues to maliciously defy the  Constitution, members of Congress, and we the people by promoting the illegal invasion of our sovereign United States by underage children from south of our borders, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) has proposed that he, a despicable, flip- flopping RINO who speaks with the most forked of tongues, is willing to work with the outlaw president in order to subvert the rule of law.

As reported, Cantor was asked what the country could do about its illegal immigrants and the children “coming across the border now.”

Cantor said that if Obama, who unilaterally imposed the Deferred Action program and has threatened to unilaterally ease deportations, could demonstrate trustworthiness on immigration, Cantor could work with him on granting amnesty to illegal immigrant children.

“But I have told the President there are some things that we can work on together,” Cantor said. “We can work on the border security bill together. We can work on things like the Kids.”

Cantor was referring to what has commonly been referred to as his “Kids Act,” which would grant amnesty to illegal immigrants who were brought to America through “no fault of their own”–like many of the illegal immigrant children who have been pouring into the country in recent weeks.


Federal officials are dumping at least a thousand illegal immigrants in Arizona this weekend, and some of them will then be moved to military bases in Oklahoma, which Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) said threatens America’s national security.

Cantor has said that “one of the great founding principles of our country was that children would not be punished for the mistakes of their parents.” United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) National Council President Kenneth Palinkas mentioned months ago that if that is the case, Congress would have to perpetually grant amnesty to children who would qualify under the Kids Act, attracting even more illegal immigrants to attempt sneaking into America.”
 -----------------------------------------------------------------

Only a deluded RINO like Eric Cantor would endorse a racist proposal to exempt any demographic group from the rule of law.

We need to be clear to one and all: America is a Democracy, or representative republic, that works only because we are a nation of laws. Our ability to get along without the use of bullets and swords hinges on our ability to respect and follow the rule of law.

Why in the hell are RINOs anxious to create an underclass of foreign invaders imbued with the fantastic notion that the rule of law does not apply to them?

How can such fuzzy thinking be of benefit to either the youthful invaders, or the innocent US citizens victimized by such poppy-cock?

For the sake of America and her citizens, Sit down and SHUT UP, Eric Cantor!

Amnesty Is Really “Voter Fraud” on Steroids!

By John W. Lillpop


The progressive scheme, with support from deluded RINOs,  to obliterate America’s existing immigration laws must be viewed for what it really is: Voter Fraud, on steroids!

Although Barack Obama and like-minded tyrants profess to be driven by humanitarian compassion for non-English speaking, impoverished illegal aliens, the truth is far more cynical, perhaps even criminal.

Indeed, the overwhelming support for amnesty among liberals is based on simple electoral math: Granting citizenship to tens of millions of illegals would unquestionably alter the political balance of power in a manner favorable to nanny-state socialists, at the expense of capitalist, free-market American citizens.

Amnesty would have the intended consequence of immediately transforming  predominantly conservative and Republican “red states” into “blue state” bastions of socialism, and worse, where welfare, food stamps, entitlements, and one-party (Democratic) tyranny would prevail.

Imagine a replication of the insanity which has all but destroyed California, imposed  throughout America!

The harm to American culture, society, economy, and political order wrought by amnesty might take multiple generations to correct, or it might be a permanent blight on America’s cherished legacy.

The burning question: How would the founding fathers regard politicians who deliberately refuse to honor the rule of law in order to “transform” America into a nanny-state of unfettered socialism?

And, just as importantly: What other civilized nation on Earth would allow foreigner invaders to illegally take over government and remake the cultural, social, economic, and political fabric of an entire nation with the greatest record of prosperity and liberty in all of human history?

Obama Obstruction of Immigration Law Results In “Urgent Humanitarian Crisis” at Border!

Obama Obstruction of Immigration Law Results In “Urgent Humanitarian Crisis” at Border!

By John W. Lillpop


President Barack Obama, in collaboration with Democrats and RINOs in the US Congress, has arrogantly refused to enforce US borders and immigration laws, and has even acted aggressively to thwart the execution of remedial actions provided for in existing law, most notably deportations.

This defiant refusal to honor the rule of law is a grave and serious violation of the concept of separation of powers and is an affront to provisions in the Constitution which endow the legislative, judiciary, and executive branches of government with balanced and equal powers.

In addition, the fact that the Obama administration willfully ignores the rule of law in order to grow the political base of the Democrat party for sheer partisan advantage makes this negligence all the more impeachable.

Obama’s immigration failures are made all the worse by the fact that tens of thousands of young, unaccompanied children are coming to the US illegally as word of the Obama non-enforcement policy spreads throughout Central America.

As reported:

Faced with 60,000 unaccompanied children trying to cross the border illegally this year, President Obama on Monday declared it an “urgent humanitarian situation” and named a federal coordinator to make sure the children are cared for — but offered no new ideas for how to keep them from trying to enter.
These “unaccompanied alien children” are the latest hiccup for an administration that has asserted the border is secure, even as it struggles to balance enforcement with humanitarian concerns.
The White House signaled that, at least for now, it sees the flow of children — which it predicts will more than double in 2015 — as an issue to be managed rather than a problem to be fought.”

Once again, the reckless, irresponsible, naïve policies of Barack Obama threaten not only the security and safety of American citizens, but now pose a real and present danger to thousands of young, help less illegal alien children!

Obama Warns Freed Terrorists May Attack Again; Harry Reid “Glad To Get Rid Of These People”!

By John W. Lillpop


Barack Obama stated the obvious about the inexplicable exchange of five murderous Taliban terrorists for a single American military deserter when he answered the following question, “Is there the possibility of some of them trying to return to activities that are detrimental to us?” by stating,

“Absolutely. That’s been true of all the prisoners that were released from Guantánamo - there’s a certain recidivism rate that takes place.”

The befuddled Obama was apparently too busy basking in the glow of what he presumed would be overwhelming support for his treasonous act to issue any sort of reassurance or apology to the American people for what could bring even more death and mayhem to young Americans serving in the military.

Obama’s “tin ear” on his illegal and immoral deal with terrorists was exceeded in ignorance and disrespect only by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who gushed, “I’m glad to get rid of these five people."

The big question: How many more  lost American lives and casualties will it take to convince Harry Reid that his celebration of the release of “these five people,” is unbelievably stupid and ill advised?


 

Obama’s Odd Passion for Illegal Aliens and Military Deserters!

By John W. Lillpop


Tens of millions of law-abiding, decent, and honorable American citizens are suffering deep financial, political, and spiritual pain these days because Barack Obama seems indifferent, or openly hostile, to the needs of middle-class American citizens.

From enactment of an inferior Marxist health care scheme loathed by most Americans; to the methodical destruction of an industry (coal) which the administration opposes on the basis of ideology, but which tens of millions of Americans rely on for employment, income and energy; to imposition of tax policies which are antithetical to economic growth and the creation of jobs; to the refusal to exploit energy opportunities that would reduce American dependence on foreign oil while putting more Americans to work(Keystone Pipeline); to policies which infringe on religious freedoms, and 1st and 2nd Amendment rights; to foreign policy decisions which abandon the interests of the nation and our allies and which cede leadership to others not committed to America’s best interests; to policies which pit Americans against Americans on issues involving race, class, economic inequality, education, health care and other vital human issues; to policies which eschew “America First”; and, finally, to a blatant disregard for the rule of law and the US Constitution.

Notwithstanding Barack Obama’s disappointing performance on behalf of most Americans, he does seem to excel when it comes to illegal aliens and military deserters.

Indeed, Obama seemed to perform a Herculean feat in securing freedom for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, accused of being a military deserter, in exchange for five of the most vile Taliban killers at GITMO.

At the same time, Obama seems quite adept at advocating on behalf of illegal aliens, criminals whom have violated US borders and laws.

Just why is it that Barack Obama fails deserving Americans so miserably, while doing so much for undesirables? 

Obama Finds Way to Evacuate GITMO in Defiance of Congress!

By John W. Lillpop


Barack Hussein Obama is, if nothing else, determined to do things his way regardless of what the US Constitution or the United States Congress may require, or even what we the people want.

One of Obama’s first decrees after taking over the Oval Office was to order that the GITMO detainee camp in Cuba be shut down and that the prisoners held there be brought to mainland America to face civilian trials.

Congressional opposition to that order was overwhelming from both sides of the political aisle. It was clear that Obama’s plan had not been thought through with any intelligence or wisdom.

Thus, Obama’s goofy GITMO scheme has been effectively blocked by Congress…until now.

As reported at the reference, The One finally acted in a manner that opens the gates to GITMO, despite the will of Congress, in order to trade five murderous Taliban captives for an American held by the Taliban.

As reported:


The Obama administration announced today that Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, who has been held by the Taliban for several years, has been freed from his captors. Reading the stories of his newfound freedom it is impossible not to feel joy for Bergdahl and his family. NBC News reports that Bergdahl held up a sign once he was on board an American helicopter that read, “SF?” The operators quickly confirmed that they were in fact U.S. Special Forces: “Yes, we’ve been looking for you for a long time.”

“On behalf of the American people, I was honored to call his parents to express our joy that they can expect his safe return, mindful of their courage and sacrifice throughout this ordeal,” President Obama said in a statement. The president rightly noted: “Sergeant Bergdahl's recovery is a reminder of America's unwavering commitment to leave no man or woman in uniform behind on the battlefield.”

Unfortunately, America is not the only party in this war that is committed to leaving no man behind. So are the Taliban and other al Qaeda-linked groups. But the president did not say who America exchanged for Bergdahl: five of the most dangerous Taliban commanders in U.S. custody.”

The big, unanswered questions: How many America lives will be lost due to Obama’s naïve dabbling in terrorist diplomacy?