Why Not Take Iran to the UN, Mr. President?

By John W. Lillpop

The latest kerfuffel involving Iran seems to have finally gotten Barack Obama’s attention, if ever so fleetingly.

Indeed, after double counting his $70 million third-quarter haul from the sheep of America, the One decided to warn Iran of the consequences of messing with Barack:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama vowed on Thursday to seek the "toughest sanctions" against Iran over an alleged plot to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington, and said the United States would not take any options off the table.

Obama, in his first public statement on the matter, called it part of a "pattern of dangerous and reckless behavior" by Tehran, which has denied the accusations. He was speaking at a joint news conference with the visiting South Korean president.”
Good for you, Barack!

Tough, tough, and more tough!

However, it does seems odd that the President is just now proposing to get tough, when it is established fact that the Iranian mobsters have thousands of centrifuges spinning madly away for the express purpose of replicating the “never happened” Holocaust from World War 11.

Nukes in the hands of the mullahs—no big deal Mr. President?

Furthermore, given the clear and present danger posed by Iran, why has Obama not taken these bastards to the UN Security Council?

Say what? That feeble body of impotent whiners in the UN, led by China and Russia, would NEVER sanction sanctions against Iran?

So, once again, why in the hell are we in the UN, Mr. President?