For Some, Truth No Es Bueno!

For Some, Truth No Es Bueno!

By John W. Lillpop

Most people who read Borderfire.com* are reasonable, intelligent, and patriotic Americans who are simply fed up with the abuses that this nation is experiencing at the hands of the Mexican government.

There are, however, exceptions. Some people actually believe that portions of America still belong to Mexico.

One such reader, named Roberto, seemed completely unhinged by my masterful and factual article about the “Appalling Stupidity of Mexican Leaders.”

Said Roberto, in part:

“What kind of retarded can write an article like this?
Anyway, TEXAS, ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, NEW MEXICO, WILL ALWAYS BE MEXICAN TERRITORY, like it or not.....”

Hmm. Clearly, Roberto needs remedial geography just to understand which nation he lives in.

For the benefit of Roberto and other deluded folks operating under the foolish notion that Mexico owns rights to any American state, the map below says it all!





















Comprehende, Roberto?

TEXAS, ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, and NEW MEXICO—Not Yours! Never will be.

End of story!


A fellow named Franco was even less civil than Roberto with this potty-mouthed comment, in part:

Republicans - You all f…ing bustards… if we are to talk about illegal aliens let’s talk about all illegal aliens and not just from south of the border people - but from allover like Canada, England, Holland, Germany, Iran etc. etc. -

Excellent point, Franco! I’m all for deporting every last damn illegal from England, Holland, Germany, Iran as soon as possible.

That would be what, about 29 total? Even goofy Janet Napolitano should be able to handle that!

By the way Franco, you can call me a f…ing bastard all you like, but calling me “Republican” is way over the top, and may result inlegal action!

Another upset reader, named Steve, chimed in with this dilly:

It never fails to amaze me how idiotic and ignorant these conservatives are. You have no solid reasons nor the respect or authority to express your opinions and expect people accept your childish "rant."

Two points: First, Steve thanks for calling me conservative, rather than Republican. You get it, son!

Secondly, if the polls are even close to being right, you had better brace yourself for a conservative take over of government on November 2.

What to Do? Why not move to Mexico, but change your name to Jose or Juan, because the government of Mexico keeps very close tabs on people with Anglican handles like Steve!

Sad to say, but For Some, Truth really No Es Bueno!



* Link: http://www.borderfirereport.net/john-w.-lillpop/appalling-stupidity-of-mexican-leaders-continues-to-amaze.php

Adios, Meg Whitman?

Adios, Meg Whitman?










By John W. Lillpop

Poor Meg Whitman. With only a hundred million dollars and change at her disposal, she is the clear under dog now that former employee Nicky Diaz has exposed Whitman as a racist hypocrite who takes advantage of Mexican housekeepers here illegally.

Rotten luck has landed squarely on the wealthy executive who used to run E-Bay, but apparently cannot run her own damn household without violating the 1986 Immigration and Enforcement Act (IRCA), labor abuse laws, and lord knows what other ethics and human decency issues in a world gone totally mad.

In Meg’s defense, finding slave labor is not as easy as it once was.

Even with the vast resources of E-Bay at her disposal, Whitman had to hire an illegal alien and retain her services for nine years just to make ends meet on the paltry $100 million a year stipend that Meg earned at E-Bay.

Hiring an American citizen was totally out of the question, given the outrageous wage and benefits that people here legally expect.

No doubt Meg decided it was best to hire Nicky Diaz and pocket the savings for a rainy day—like the day when she would run for Governor and would need every penny possible to buy the job.

Whitman’s biggest mistake was not necessarily hiring Diaz.

Rather, her big boo-boo came when she argued vehemently during her debate with Moonbeam Jerry Brown for the prosecution of employers who hire illegals.

No exceptions, she righteously demanded!

Now that Nicky Diaz and Democrat-operative attorney Gloria Allred have produced a classic “Cry and Lie” campaign ad to support ding-bat Jerry Brown, what might be next?

Prediction: Jerry Brown is still California’s Attorney General which makes him responsible for prosecuting the type of criminals that Meg Whitman mentioned during their debate.

Look for Brown to have Whitman dragged off the campaign trail in handcuffs and leg irons for her crimes against Nicky Diaz, the Mexican people, and all of humanity.

Also look for that BREAKING NEWS to be timed so as to keep the pictures of Whitman’s arrest fresh in the public’s mind right up to November 2!

And what is the solution to all of this back-biting and hate politics?

My solution: Arrest Whitman AND Brown AND Nicky Diaz AND Gloria Allred and deport the entire lot of them to Mexico—before November 2!

Then call a special election to fill the governor’s seat with a responsible politician—if possible!

Adios, Meg Whitman?

By John W. Lillpop

Poor Meg Whitman. With only a hundred million dollars and change at her disposal, she is the clear under dog now that former employee Nicky Diaz has exposed Whitman as a racist hypocrite who takes advantage of Mexican housekeepers here illegally.

Rotten luck has landed squarely on the wealthy executive who used to run E-Bay, but apparently cannot run her own damn household without violating the 1986 Immigration and Enforcement Act (IRCA), labor abuse laws, and lord knows what other ethics and human decency issues in a world gone totally mad.

In Meg’s defense, finding slave labor is not as easy as it once was.

Even with the vast resources of E-Bay at her disposal, Whitman had to hire an illegal alien and retain her services for nine years just to make ends meet on the paltry $100 million a year stipend that Meg earned at E-Bay.

Hiring an American citizen was totally out of the question, given the outrageous wage and benefits that people here legally expect.

No doubt Meg decided it was best to hire Nicky Diaz and pocket the savings for a rainy day—like the day when she would run for Governor and would need every penny possible to buy the job.

Whitman’s biggest mistake was not necessarily hiring Diaz.

Rather, her big boo-boo came when she argued vehemently during her debate with Moonbeam Jerry Brown for the prosecution of employers who hire illegals.

No exceptions, she righteously demanded!

Now that Nicky Diaz and Democrat-operative attorney Gloria Allred have produced a classic “Cry and Lie” campaign ad to support ding-bat Jerry Brown, what might be next?

Prediction: Jerry Brown is still California’s Attorney General which makes him responsible for prosecuting the type of criminals that Meg Whitman mentioned during their debate.

Look for Brown to have Whitman dragged off the campaign trail in handcuffs and leg irons for her crimes against Nicky Diaz, the Mexican people, and all of humanity.

Also look for that BREAKING NEWS to be timed so as to keep the pictures of Whitman’s arrest fresh in the public’s mind right up to November 2!

And what is the solution to all of this back-biting and hate politics?

My solution: Arrest Whitman AND Brown AND Nicky Diaz AND Gloria Allred and deport the entire lot of them to Mexico—before November 2!

Then call a special election to fill the governor’s seat with a responsible politician—if possible!

Appalling Stupidity of Mexico's “Leaders” Continues to Amaze

Appalling Stupidity of Mexican “Leaders” Continues to Amaze

By John W. Lillpop

Officials from Mexico continue to amaze with their brazen behavior which suggests that these simple, but criminal, people have been cursed with genetic insanity, or stupidity, or perhaps both.

Recent news from this third-world sewer confirms that all is not well in the land that has gifted the world with swine flu and salmonella outbreaks, lethal in the extreme.

The first item involves the inflammatory border fence issue:


When the United States began construction of a border fence to keep illegal aliens from invading America across our southern borders, the outrage from Mexico and the American ding-bat left was palpable.

Racist, discriminatory, unfair, and bigoted heathen were among the less offensive terms used to describe those who advocated the fence.

Mexico even threatened to report America to the United Nations for building a fence on U.S. soil using American taxpayers’ money, and American labor to complete the job.

Logically, that would mean that President Calderon and the other officials running Mexico would never use a fence to restrict free passage to whoever wished to come to Mexico, right?

Think again!

When it comes to illegal aliens crossing into Mexico from south of its borders, a border fence makes perfect sense and bears not a smidgen of racism or jingoism:

“Mexico has had it up to here with illegal aliens. So they’ve begun building a fence along the border. Not along its northern border with the United States, but along its southern border with Guatemala.

“According to the head of customs for Mexico’s tax administration, Raul Diaz, the Mexican border state of Chiapas is constructing a wall along the country’s southern border with Guatemala, along the river Suchiate which divides the countries. Diaz says the purpose of the wall is to prevent the passage of contraband, but admits, “It could also prevent the free passage of illegal immigrants.”

So, President Calderon, how can you justify a border fence in Mexico while vehemently opposing the same for the United States to protect its border with Mexico?

A likely answer from the muddled Mexican:

It is really quite simple, Mr. John. Mexico is taking on the expense and burden of a fence in order to keep Guatemalans from entering Mexico on their way to the United States. This is all about reducing illegal immigration into the great nation of America!"

But Mr. President what about the millions of
Mexicans who have invaded America and millions more who are planning to?

Mr. John, you are mixing tacos and tamales! Mexicans go to America to help your people and economy. America needs Mexican workers, legal or not.

Once again, the hypocrisy coming from Mexico is stupefying, out paced only by the stupidity from American politicians who favor open borders, amnesty, and other outrageous concessions to criminals from the third-world!

The second item involves the even more stupid request by Mexico that the U.S. stop deporting serious criminals from Mexico back to that God-forsaken pile of crap.

As reported in part at Judicial Watch.com:


"In a flabbergasting request, a coalition of Mexican lawmakers has asked the United States to stop deporting illegal immigrants who have been convicted of serious crimes in American courts.

The preposterous demand was made at a recent southern California conference in which the mayors of four Mexican cities that border the U.S. gathered to discuss cross-border issues. The only American mayor who attended the biannual event was San Diego’s Jerry Sanders, evidently because his city hosted it this year at a fancy downtown hotel.

Among the cross-border topics that were addressed at the conference was the deportation of Mexican citizens who have committed violent crimes in the U.S. The felons are persona non grata in their communities, say the mayors of Tijuana, Ciudad Juarez, Nogales and Nuevo Laredo. They want U.S. officials to stem the deportation of such convicts to their cities, according to a local newspaper report that covered the conference.

To support the request, the mayor (Jose Reyes Ferriz) of Mexico’s most violent city, Ciudad Juarez, pointed out that of 80,000 people deported to his community in the past three years nearly 30,000 had committed serious crimes in the U.S. Around 7,000 had served sentences for rape and 2,000 for murder. The criminal deportees have contributed to the escalating drug-cartel violence in his city, Mayor Ferriz said, so he wants the U.S. to make other arrangements when prison sentences are completed."


The only intelligent answer to the Mexican’s idiotic request is as follows: Instead of railing against the United States for defending the American people, Mexico needs to take whatever action—including armed military force—to keep its illiterate peasants from invading America in the first place.

Keep your garbage out of the U.S. and we will not send it back.

Unfortunately for the American people and Democracy, the Obama administration and the leftist morons in Congress are more stupid and irresponsible that Mexico’s half-assed leaders.

Solution: Since Obama, Pelosi, and Reid and the rest of the left are so smitten by Mexicans, let’s deport the entire Democrat party to Mexico, en Mass! On November 3.

Worse for America: Nancy Pelosi or BP Oil Spill?

By John W. Lillpop

When Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco hijacked the gavel assigned to the Speaker of the U.S. House in 2007, she made elaborate plans to save the Democrat party, the American people, America, and the entire world.

Hers was, they said, living proof of the value of affirmative action in bringing qualified minorities and women into the halls of power in the U.S. Congress. Great things were seen for Pelosi and her historic ascension to immutable power.

With all of the charm and affection one would expect from a rattlesnake in heat, Madam Pelosi confidently promised a “New Day in America.” She promised complete eradication of the culture of corruption that Republicans had institutionalized in the House.

Her signature line, “Perhaps it will take a woman to clean the House,” seemed to be the new reality as the leftist from California took the reigns of power.

The new Speaker immediately sought to flex her muscles in foreign policy as she ignored the wishes of Republican President George W. Bush and acted as a mediator of sorts between Israel and Syria.

Granny Diplomacy, Ala Nancy Pelosi, turned out to be a flop as Pelosi flubbed the simple transmission of a simple message between the parties, an inexcusable mistake that damn near set off a new middle-east war.

Pelosi’s promise of a “New Day in America” has indeed been fulfilled, although not in the manner that she anticipated.

As reported, in part, at the Washington Examiner (See reference), four years into the Pelosi Speaker gig, she is regarded with the same degree of affection as the BP oil spill.

That report, in part:

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's negative ratings have hit an all-time high in the new Wall Street Journal/NBC News poll. A full 50 percent of those surveyed have a somewhat or very negative impression of Pelosi, while just 22 percent have a somewhat or very positive impression of her.”

A new day in America, indeed!

The American electorate has finally caught on to the outrageous anti-American nature of Nancy Pelosi and her collaborative Marxists in the White House and Congress!

THAT IS TRULY A NEW DAY WORTH CELEBRATING WITH A ROARING REVOLUTION ON NOVEMBER 2!



Reference http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/blogs/beltway-confidential/Pelosis-negatives-hit-all-time-high-as-unpopular-as-BP-103977024.html#ixzz10sylHcYh

Biden’s “Stop Whining” Whining Riles the Left—Against Obama!

By John W. Lillpop

Next to President Obama himself, the most effective campaigner for the GOP to date has been the trite, but likable, Joe Biden.

Frustrated and angered by all the gloomy news about the Democrats’ prospects in five weeks, the VP decided to take bold and decisive action in his patented style: He said something really stupid to grab the headlines and change the focus—at least for a wee bit of a news cycle.

It all took place in the state of New Hampshire at a frozen yogurt plant when Biden whined the following as reported, in part, at the reference:

“Vice President Joe Biden stoked a firestorm of liberal discontent with President Barack Obama on Monday -- demanding that the Democratic base "stop whining" and start fighting Republicans instead of the White House.”

Biden’s impromptu whining did not amuse many on the far left, including the “brains” of the Daily Kos who said the following, also reported in part at the reference:

"It's idiotic is what it is," says Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas, one of Obama's most pointed critics on the left. If people had jobs, no one would be whining. They have reaped what they sowed. They haven't delivered on what they've promised -- and instead of making the case as to why they would do if they are reelected, they are insulting people.”

By God, it seems as though Markos Moulitsas may be on to something!

Love that line—“They reaped what they sowed.”

What a beautiful way to describe the unilateral suicide of the Far Left!

Reference: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10271/1090796-473.stm#ixzz10rnTjKCJ

And They Accuse the Tea Party of Racism?

By John W. Lillpop

The nation that Americans know and love is headed to social, economic, moral, and political demise under the reign of President Barack Obama and his Democrat congress.

Two recent headline stories provide more than ample evidence of the fact that our way of life has been hijacked by an incompetent and anti-American amateur whose hatred for this nation is only now being fully understood.

The first story involves mind-numbing testimony by Christopher Coates to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. In that appearance, Coates stated that the Department of Justice, in essence, has a policy of refusing to consider complaints of abuse alleged by white citizens. Coates characterized the handling of the New Black Panther Party case as a “travesty of justice.”

Imagine a government that refuses to protect citizens because they happen to be white. Such a policy conjures up memories of the Old South, in which segregated schools, Jim Crow Laws, and open discrimination against blacks, Jews, homosexuals, and Catholics was the norm.

Apparently, we have NOT moved beyond that sorted of bigoted and hateful thinking. In any event, is THAT the sort of CHANGE that you voted for, America?

The second recent news item has to do with Obama’s obsession with controlling and or shutting down the Internet, which he sees as hostile to progressives.

Given this administration’s woeful record on equal enforcement of civil rights laws and absolute refusal to enforce American borders and immigration laws, why should Obama be granted any further leverage over the most vital communications link in the world?

Besides, Obama’s justification for wiretapping and other meddling with the internet is allegedly based on concerns over “terrorism.”

Domestic wiretapping needed because of the terrorist threat?

Sounds familiar: Does the name W. ring a bell?

Americans would do well to heed the warnings of the Tea Party before it is too late!

Is the Term "Indian Summer" Racist?

By John W. Lillpop


















Those of us who live in California have grown accustomed to a unique weather phenomenon that occurs each year as the traditional summer season winds down.

In September, October, and even as late as November, California has what is indelicately referred to as “Indian Summer.” The term refers to the final blast of hot, dry weather for the year that occurs well into fall.

To the best of my knowledge, Indian Summer has no racist connotation nor is the term meant as a derogatory slam against Native Americans or even summer.

Still, in the politically correct mental asylum otherwise known as San Franciso, there are liberals who cannot sleep at night because of neurotic concerns that “Indian Summer” is divisive, non-inclusive, un-American, and most especially, “Not San Francisco.”

Of course, these are the same mainstream folk who think that the American flag, U.S. military, heterosexual marriage, Christianity, the pro-life movement, traditional family values, and all Republicans are “Not San Francisco.” Being so designated brings me comfort and gratitude!

Besides being completely harmless, Indian Summer is much easier to spell and pronounce than, say, “Indigenous People Summer,” or “Native American Summer.” But logic and common sense are almost never obstacles to San Francisco liberals intent on amusing the rest of the planet with PC absurdities.

And that is why locals are also looking into an alternative name for the San Francisco Giants, thought by some to be an insensitive slur aimed at big and tall minority men. In addition, anyone caught uttering “Mexican standoff” in public may soon face a fine, or be forced to spend a weekend in The City.

Referring to smelly, unkempt beggars with all their worldly possessions in a shopping cart as “Homeless” may soon be codified as a major felony in San Francisco. The preferred term is “Displaced Victim of the Jobless Bush Economy.”

As for me, I am unbowed by the PC craze. My plans include taking in a ballgame between the Giants and the Redlegs of Cincinnati, or the Cleveland Indians and the Chicago White Sox. I plan to root for the White Sox, not because I am a white bigot, but because they win! In other words, I am a front-runner.

Here is wishing you and yours a most pleasant and prosperous Indian Summer!


John W. Lillpop is a recovering liberal.

San Francisco Chronicle: NO to Barbara Boxer!

By John W. Lillpop


Barbara Boxer had to know that this day would eventually ensue.

That being the day when her 18 years of insolence, arrogance, and ineptness in the United States Senate would be exposed, leading to hearty and viable opposition to her continued “service” on behalf of California.

However, in her wildest dreams Boxer probably never imagined that her candidacy would be rejected by the San Francisco Chronicle, the rag that always supports left-wingers like Boxer.

Yet, there it is, in black and white for all the world to see.

From the September 26, 2010 San Francisco Chronicle editorial, in part (See Reference):

“Californians are left with a deeply unsatisfying choice for the U.S. Senate this year. The incumbent, Democrat Barbara Boxer, has failed to distinguish herself during her 18 years in office. There is no reason to believe that another six-year term would bring anything but more of the same uninspired representation. It is extremely rare that this editorial page would offer no recommendation on any race, particularly one of this importance. This is one necessary exception.

“For some Californians, Boxer's reliably liberal voting record may be reason enough to give her another six years in office. But we believe Californians deserve more than a usually correct vote on issues they care about. They deserve a senator who is accessible, effective and willing and able to reach across party lines to achieve progress on the great issues of our times. Boxer falls short on those counts.

“In past elections, Boxer has had the good fortune of having Republican opponents who were inept, underfunded, on the fringe right - or combinations thereof. Her opponent this time, (Carly) Fiorina, is proving to be articulate, well-funded and formidable.

“It is a dismal choice between an ineffective advocate for causes we generally upport and a potentially strong advocate for positions we oppose. Neither merits our endorsement for the U.S. Senate.”

Granted, the Chronicle’s rejection of Madam Boxer is driven by the fact that editors see Boxer as an obstacle to the complete Marxist take-over of America.

And it is true that the Chronicle’s failure to endorse Fiornia suggests that liberal insanity is still a major health issue in the editorial board room of this once- esteemed publication.

Still, at least the Chronicle editors have finally seen fit to call out Boxer for her ineffective and wasteful occupation of a vital seat in the U.S. Senate.

On that, we can agree!



Reference: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/09/26/EDCL1F4PRK.DTL#ixzz10kqwgCfb

Update from Mexico: Not All Border Fences Are Racist

By John W. Lillpop

When the United States began construction of a border fence to keep illegal aliens from invading America across our southern borders, the outrage from Mexico and the American ding-bat left was palpable.

Racist, discriminatory, unfair, and bigoted heathen were among the less offensive terms used to describe those who advocated the fence.

Mexico even threatened to report America to the United Nations for building a fence on U.S. soil using American taxpayers’ money, and American labor to complete the job.

Logically, that would mean that President Calderon and the other officials running Mexico would never use a fence to restrict free passage to whoever wished to come to Mexico, right?

Think again!

As reported at the reference, when it comes to illegal aliens crossing into Mexico from south of its borders, a border fence makes perfect sense and bears not a smidgen of racism or jingoism:

“Mexico has had it up to here with illegal aliens. So they’ve begun building a fence along the border. Not along its northern border with the United States, but along its southern border with Guatemala.

“According to the head of customs for Mexico’s tax administration, Raul Diaz, the Mexican border state of Chiapas is constructing a wall along the country’s southern border with Guatemala, along the river Suchiate which divides the countries. Diaz says the purpose of the wall is to prevent the passage of contraband, but admits, “It could also prevent the free passage of illegal immigrants.”

So, President Calderon, how can you justify a border fence in Mexico while vehemently opposing the same for the United States to protect its border with Mexico?

A likely answer from the muddled Mexican:

It is really quite simple, Mr. John. Mexico is taking on the expense and burden of a fence in order to keep Guatemalans from entering Mexico on their way to the United States. This is all about reducing illegal immigration into the great nation of America!"

But Mr. President what about the millions of
Mexicans who have invaded America and millions more who are planning to?

Mr. John, you are mixing tacos and tamales! Mexicans go to America to help your people and economy. America needs Mexican workers, legal or not.

Once again, the hypocrisy coming from Mexico is stupefying, out paced only by the stupidity from American politicians who favor open borders, amnesty, and other outrageous concessions to criminals from the third-world!


Ref: http://www.ihatethemedia.com/border-fence-united-states-mexico-guatemala

Time to Seize Bank of Obama!

Time to Seize Bank of Obama!





By John W. Lillpop

How is it that the federal government, now $13 trillion dollars in debt with no end to reckless spending in sight, is mandated to seize banks, and now credit unions, because of insolvency and poor money management practices?

Does any sane person really believe that Barack Obama and his tax-dodging goons at the U.S. Treasury are able to manage assets better than the failing banks?

Still, the federal government continues to rush in to “rescue” ever more institutions, those who suffer because of the “progressive” notion that higher taxes and an anti-business environment are keys to prosperity.

As reported at Reference 1, in part:

“Regulators on Friday shut down small banks in Florida and Washington state, bringing to 127 the number of U.S. bank failures this year on a wave of loan defaults and economic distress.

With 127 closures nationwide so far this year, the pace of bank failures exceeds that of 2009, which was already a brisk year for shutdowns. By this time last year, regulators had closed 95 banks.

The number of bank failures is expected to peak this year and be slightly higher than the 140 that fell in 2009. That was the highest annual tally since 1992, at the height of the savings and loan crisis. The 2009 failures cost the insurance fund more than $30 billion. Twenty-five banks failed in 2008, the year the financial crisis struck with force; only three succumbed in 2007.”

This crisis is also due, in large part, to Marxist orthodoxy, which holds that home ownership, regardless of income, employment history, immigration status, credit worthiness, available assets, and other reasonable standards, should be eschewed in order to spread the wealth.

After all, they say, home ownership is a constitutional right!

When and if fiscal sanity returns to Washington, D.C. in the form of a Republican revolution this November, the new congress must immediately commission a SWAT team to kick in the door of Timothy Geithner at the U.S. Treasury and seize all taxpayer assets being held hostage by the failed Bank of Obama!

While you are at it, patriots, have the SWAT team do lunch in Kentucky early in January and, while there, visit Fort Knox to see if there is anything in the vault other than a few thousand rusty Obama-Biden campaign buttons, and a batch of autographed The Audacity of Hope books buried in cob webs!

A National Priority: Shut down the Bank of Obama and declare the federal government, as currently constituted, unworthy of stewardship over the assets and wealth of the American people!



Ref 1 http://apnews.myway.com/article/20100925/D9IEMB381.html

America Not Christian? Great State of Texas Begs to Differ!

America Not Christian? Great State of Texas Begs to Differ!

By John W. Lillpop

Among the most egregious misspeaks issued by America’s 44Th president is his mindless declaration, whilst on Muslim soil, that America is NOT a Christian nation.

That ill-advised (stupid) salvo is still drawing blood from approximately 225 million Americans (Reference 1) who identify themselves as Christians.

So why would a new president insult 225 million fellow countrymen and women on foreign soil so soon after taking office?

Simply put, because Americans are not fellow countrymen or women to Barack Obama who, is, in fact,Kenyan by birth and Muslim by choice!

While Obama outraged millions with his attempted demotion of Jesus Christ here in America, outraged Texans are actually doing something to counter the “Obama Effect.”

Specifically, as reported, in part, at Reference 2:

“The elected Texas Board of Education today adopted a resolution that warns textbook publishers to be careful and provide fair treatment of the world's religions – or face being snubbed by the state that buys more textbooks than any other.

“The resolution, introduced by former Texas school board member Randy Rives, states: "Resolved, That the SBOE will look to reject future prejudicial social studies submissions that continue to offend Texas law with respect to treatment of the world's major religious groups by significant inequalities of coverage space-wise and/or by demonizing or lionizing one or more of them over others."

“The resolution, adopted on a 7-6 vote, declares that "pro-Islamic/anti-Christian half-truths, selective disinformation, and false editorial stereotypes still roil some social studies textbooks nationwide," including some "politically correct whitewashes of Islamic culture and stigmas on Christian civilization."

“The resolution included pages of footnotes documenting the specific offenses discovered in various textbooks, including "patterns of pejoratives toward Christians and superlatives toward Muslims, calling Crusaders aggressors, 'violent attackers,' or 'invaders' while euphemizing Muslim conquest of Christian lands as 'migrations' by 'empire builders.”

The bottom line?

A stern warning to Barack Hussein Obama and other anti-Christian Islamofascist sympathizers: Don’t Mess With Texas!

Loretta Sanchez’s Enemies List: Vietnamese and Republicans!

By John W. Lillpop

There is nothing quite as amusing as watching a liberal politician who has parlayed alleged racism into undeserved votes for more than a decade suddenly forced on the defensive over her own overt racism.

Such is the case with Democrat Loretta Brixey, who changed her surname to Sanchez upon learning that there were considerably more Hispanics than previously thought in the 46th District of Orange County which she was trying to wrest from Republican incumbent and Caucasian Bob Dornan in 1996.

Ultimately, Brixley’s name change, good enough to garner at least 1,000 votes from illegal aliens, catapulted the Democrat into the U.S. House of Representatives where she has misrepresented the good people of her district ever since.

However, that was then ,this is now.

Now we have the self-righteous, but knot headed, Loretta Sanchez issuing a parsed-word apology for her outburst against her Vietnamese opponent, a good man and Republican, named Van Tran.

As reported, in part, at Reference 1:

“SANTA ANA – Democratic Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez said Friday that her now-famous remark about "Vietnamese" trying to take her seat had been misinterpreted but apologized if it caused any offense.

“She did not, however, apologize for calling her Republican challenger Van Tran – himself an immigrant from Vietnam – anti-immigrant. Instead, she accused him of using her words to "take a cheap political shot

“Sanchez told an interviewer earlier this month on Spanish-language television that "the Vietnamese and the Republicans" were trying to wrest control of her seat in Congress. She described Tran in the same interview as "very anti-immigrant and very anti-Hispanic."

"I used a poor choice of words that some people have taken as offensive," Sanchez said during a small press conference late Friday afternoon. "Let me say as clearly as I can that if, through my inarticulate use of the language, I offended anyone, I apologize for those remarks."

Given the throat-cutting, no holds barred, intensity of the 2010 elections, one can readily understand how a “poor choice of words” could inadvertently slip into one’s rhetoric, especially through the friendly microphones of a Spanish-language TV broadcast.

But denigrating one for being Vietnamese AND Republican?

That is way over the line, even for a Pelosi Democrat!


http://www.ocregister.com/news/sanchez-268143-tran-vietnamese.html

FINALLY! Equal Rights for Women in Virginia!

FINALLY! Equal Rights for Women in Virginia!







By John W. Lillpop

Somewhere in an underground bunker in California, feminist radical Gloria Steinem must surely be sobbing bitter tears of sweet victory on the morning after full equality for women was achieved in Jarrat, Virginia.

After nearly 100 years of discrimination, abuse, and being treated like the "weaker sex," women in the great state of Virginia have been liberated, both figuratively and literally, by Steinem’s obsession with obliterating differences between men and women throughout the land.

As reported, in part, at Reference 1:

“JARRATT, VA - The first woman to be executed in five years in the United States was put to death in Virginia Thursday night. 41-year-old Teresa Lewis died by injection at the Greensville Correctional Center.

"She was in prison for arranging the 2002 murders of her husband and a stepson in order to collect an insurance payout. The two men she hired to do those killings were both sentenced to life in prison, although one committed suicide in 2006.Lewis was the first woman executed in Virginia in nearly a century. Larry Traylor of the Virginia Dept. of Corrections said, "Death was pronounced at 9:13 p.m. There were no complications.”

Reached on her cell phone inside the bunker, Steinem reacted to the news of the execution with this text message(Satire):

“Teresa Lewis was a brave heroine, a woman who is to be revered and respected by all women regardless of political ideology.

“Her death by lethal injection serves notice to the male-dominated penal industry in Jarratt and all across this great land.

“That notice is as follows : ‘Women are equal to men in all matters, including depravity, criminality, greed, and murderous instinct. Teresa Lewis has broken through the barrier of sexist exception, an act that will undoubetdly lead to the excecution of hundreds of other female comrades.’

‘Thanks to Teresa Lewis, woman can now rejoice in knowing that we are FREE AT LAST!’

And so it is, as the femi-Nazi movement moves ever forward in advancing the cause of women hither and yonder!



Reference 1 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/39340886

VICTORY--A Word “They Dare Not Speak” in Obama’s War Room!

By John W. Lillpop


Unless Bob Woodward has recently sold his professional soul just to improve book sales, his description of President Obama’s attitude and policies concerning the war in Afghanistan are shocking, frightening, and should be cause for great outrage.

As reported in the Washington Post (See link), in part, about Woodward’s new book:

“According to Woodward's meeting-by-meeting, memo-by-memo account of the 2009 Afghan strategy review, the president avoided talk of victory as he described his objectives.”

In other words, Woodward portrays our alleged Commander-in-Chief as tepid to the whole notion of actually winning in Afghanistan!

Surprised?

How so, given the fact that Afghanistan is an Islamic nation and America is not—repeat NOT—at war with Islam?

Besides, everyone knows how supersensitive Obama is when it comes to actions that might “offend” Muslims.

Like the threatened Quran-burning crisis two weeks, ago when the president pleaded with Christians to listen to the voices of “better angels,” in order to pacify terrorists.

Mind you, the angels that Obama cavorts with would slit your infidel throat from ear-to-ear for even the slightest slight aimed at Allah, the Quaran, or anything Muslim.

Imagine, then, the trepidation the president must feel when assembled war experts and strategists use the V word, or come even close to suggesting a solid knock out punch to the mouths of Religion of Peace warriors!

Not cool!

Sadly, if Obama were just 1 percent as concerned about offending American citizens as he is about “pi***** off” the bad guys, his approval ratings would be off the charts, instead of in the tank.

The real outrage is that Obama’s shyness over winning the war is a betrayal of the more than 1,000 Americans who have already given their lives on the ground in Afghanistan, and the lord-knows-how-many-more will do so under the watch of a Commander-in-Chief who is more concerned about political victory in 2012 that he is with the lives of Americans.

Remember, too, 30,000 Americans were sent to war in Afghanistan by our cross-dressing Christian-Muslim president during his “surge.”

Wonder how those young men and women, and their families, feel about Obama’s aversion to victory?


Link Reference: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/09/21/AR2010092106706_pf.html

Barack Obama: The Great UNiter?

Barack Obama: The Great UNiter?








By John W. Lillpop


Barack Obama is becoming a huge embarrassment to the American way of life and the American people.

Unlike his immediate predecessor, this president is not handicapped by poor English, stuttering and stammering, or other inelegance.

In fact, he is articulate, smooth, and in possession of world-class oratory skills, especially when his teleprompter is properly tuned.

However, Obama’s defining fault is that his flowery language and high-sounding oratory is not reflected in his performance as a so-called world leader.

Or, as Obama chided Sarah Palin two years ago, it’s about “Lip stick on a pig!”

Obama’s recent speech to the United Nation is an excellent example.

As reported, in part, at Yahoo.com:

“UNITED NATIONS – Exhorting world leaders to push past years of cynicism and pessimism, President Barack Obama challenged the countries of the United Nations on Thursday to unite around peace efforts that he said could achieve agreement within a year to create an independent Palestine and a secure Israel.

“As Obama spoke, Israel's seat in the hall sat empty because it was a Jewish holiday. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas was present, listening to the president through a translator's earphone. Obama's call for a Palestinian state drew a burst of applause from throughout the hall.

“Faced with the real possibility of the collapse of negotiations, Obama implored the international community to get behind the idea of peace and forget favoritism to one side or the other.

“Obama urged the U.N. in its 60th year to look beyond past Middle East peace failures and get on with the task at hand.”

Mind you, all of this from a president who cannot even unite his own fellow Democrats in the U.S. Congress in advance of a vital mid-term election.

This from a president who has been the most divisive president in recent U.S. history.

Barack Obama, The Great UNiter?

Don’t be silly!

Obama Faults Himself for Health Care—But for Wrong Reason!

By John W. Lillpop


In a clear sign that he still simply does not get it, Barack Obama chastened himself for the health care fiasco—but did so for the wrong reason.

As reported, in part, at Yahoo.com:

“FALLS CHURCH, Va. – Blaming himself for coolness to his health care overhaul, President Barack Obama is seeking to reintroduce the law to voters who don't much like or understand it six months after he signed it.

“A new Associated Press poll finds high levels of misunderstanding about what's actually in the law, and more people opposed than in support. And with crucial midterm elections six weeks away, the only Democrats running ads about the historic legislation are the ones who voted "no."

“Obama ruefully told his listeners, "Sometimes I fault myself for not being able to make the case more clearly to the country."

If Obama had even a hint of a clue, he would apologize for displacing the greatest health care in the world with a Marxist system that the American people did not want six months ago, and want even less today.

He would apologize for the bribery, corruption, lying, numbers manipulations, broken campaign promises, secrecy, violations of the U.S. Constitution, and anti-democratic gyrations needed to pass ObamaCare into law.

If Barack Obama really cared, he would lead the effort to repeal his signature piece of nonsense.

He would call for a reasoned and careful debate of the issue, including taking into account the wishes of the American people.

With all due respect, Mr. President, the LAST thing the people need is more spin and sales baloney from you about an inferior health care system!

Aunt Zeituni: Insight into Obama’s Anti-Rule of Law Thinking!

Aunt Zeituni: Insight into Obama’s Disastrous Thinking on Illegals!




By John W. Lillpop

Patriotic, law-abiding American citizens have been shocked and dismayed by President Obama’s consistent refusal to secure U.S. borders with Mexico and by his complete disregard for the rule of law in dealing with tens of millions of illegal aliens squatting here unlawfully.

Time and again, Obama has favored illegal aliens over American citizens, as was the case with the treasonous federal lawsuit against Arizona for defending its citizenry from foreign invaders.

Obama aggravated this assault with an equally toxic report to the UN which listed Arizona’s SB 1070 as an example of human rights violations.

An American president wages war against a sovereign state of the Republic for that state’s efforts to enforce the rule of law? In order to protect foreign invaders?

What could possibly be going through Obama’s mind in executing such an extreme anti-American Jihad?

A possible insight emerges from a recent interview of Obama’s illegal alien aunt, Zeituni Onyango, with WBZ-TV in Boston.

As reported, in part, at the reference:


"If I come as an immigrant, you have the obligation to make me a citizen." Those are the words from 58-year-old Zeituni Onyango of Kenya in a recent exclusive interview with WBZ-TV.”

In other words, according to Obama relative Aunt Zeituni, America’s borders and laws are meaningless.

The needs and wishes of American citizens are irrelevant when compared to the "obligation" to grant citizenship to all who come--even if they are here illegally!

That sort of mangled logic, issued to mask criminality and barbaric selfishness, seems a fair recital of Obama’s immigration policy.

In addition, Obama’s wrong-minded, UN-American stance on illegals was exposed even further in a pathetic pandering to the Hispanic Congressional Caucus in which Obama essentially justified illegal invasions with these words:


“Obama: "Mexicans" Were Here "Long Before America Was Even An Idea”

The above paraphrased quote was reported at Reference 2 by realclearpolitics.com.

Clearly, America deserves much better.

We can begin the process of reclaiming America for Americans in November by expelling the congressional vermin that have joined hands with Obama over the past two years!


Reference 1: http://wbztv.com/local/obama.aunt.zeituni.2.1921954.html

Reference 2
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/09/21/obama_mexicans_were_here_long_before_america_was_even_an_idea.html

Gays, Illegals But Pawns in Left's Evil Game of Political Chess

By John W. Lillpop


To naïve gays and illegal aliens, the defeat of Harry Reid’s ploy to attach amnesty and repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell to the Defense Appropriations bill is a bitter pill to swallow. The more seriously naïve may even feel sorry for the beleaguered Reid, who is on the cusp of being ordered to get the hell out of Washington D.C. by the good people of Nevada.

Rest assured that Harry Reid deserves zero sympathy or thanks for his gallant efforts to subvert the will of the people!

Rest assured also that, behind closed doors, Reid is quietly celebrating the defeats and is accepting props from other leftist maniacs who share his cynical duping of people.

In Harry Reid’s pathetic world, the votes earn a MISSION ACCOMPLISHED banner, not unlike the one that W. unfurled in 2003 when it appeared as though Iraq was a done deal.

Reid’s banner is to hail the achievement of his REAL objective: Force Republicans to vote against gays and illegal aliens in a profound manner just before the elections.

And you thought Reid’s objective was to advocate on behalf of needy gays and illegals?

Don’t be silly!

Reid is using gays and illegal aliens as pawns in his futile effort to preserve his seat in the Senate and Democrats’ majority in that body!

Reid will fail on both counts and, deservedly so, because his evil exploitation of people for personal political purposes is vile and un-American!

W.'s Recession Goes Missing!

Satire by John W. Lillpop

In a critical election year such as 2010, the president in power and his party would normally be elated to learn that the nation’s economy has escaped the clutches of recession during their watch.

However, in this post-partisan era, Barack Obama and fellow Democrats are barely chortling at all after learning that the great W. recession actually ended in 2009! See reference.

What on earth is preventing Obama Marxists from dancing in the streets to celebrate the fact that, according to The National Bureau of Economic Research, the recession that began in December 2007 ended in June 2009?

To begin with, the news means that President George W. Bush did a great job planting the seeds for recovery before he left office on January 20, 2009.

It also means that the much ballyhooed “Recovery Summer” took place just five months after Bush left the White House, not in the summer of 2010 as Obama and Biden have bleated.

It also means that Obama’s trillion dollar “stimulus” did nothing but inflate the national debt by a trill, and was entirely unnecessary.

Further, logic dictates that if Obama’s original “stimulus” was unneeded, so, too, are his subsequent raids of the U.S. Treasury in the name of “saving” the economy!

That includes his latest $50 billion emergency request.

Above all else, Obama’s childish game of “Blame Bush” suffers a major credibility hit if, in fact, Obama inherited an economy that was well on its way to self-healing, sans the ruinous stimulus scandals and wasteful spending of zany Marxists.

Of course, the end of the recovery cannot mask the fact that unemployment is near 10 percent, foreclosures and bankruptcies are soaring, and that the American people overwhelmingly believe that the nation is headed in the wrong direction.

How to explain those unpleasant realities, Mr. President?

Say what? All of that was "inherited" from W.?

Exactly!

Reference http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/09/20/nber-recession-ended-in-june-2009/

Best for America: “Guard the Change” or “Change the Guard”?

By John W. Lillpop


Light and wisdom have finally visited the soul of Colin Powell, former Secretary of State and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Powell is the RINO who endorsed Barack Obama for the presidency, an act which had nothing whatsoever to do with race, according to the general


Powell’s enlightenment is somewhat muted by the fact the he believes that Obama “has lost the touch.”

What touch, General?

Anyone listening seriously to what Obama has been saying since 2007 knows that Obama never has had, and will never have, any touch other than a great passion to prove that American exceptionalism is a myth.

Obama is truly an anti-American radical whose rise to power is proof positive that American exceptionalism is non-existent---among Democrats.

The president’s denial continues abated despite his pathetic poll numbers and the looming thrashing Democrats are likely to suffer come November. Still, Obama believes that the Change he was brought is worth guarding.

As reported at Yahoo.com, in part:


“WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama, seeking to fire up an important part of his support base ahead of November's elections, told black leaders on Saturday he wanted their support to "guard the change" he was delivering.

‘I need everybody here to go back to your neighborhoods, and your workplaces, to your churches, and barbershops, and beauty shops. Tell them we have more work to do. Tell them we can't wait to organize. Tell them that the time for action is now,’ he told the Congressional Black Caucus.

“The words of America's first black president showed a deliberate effort to recapture the enthusiasm that had helped him win the White House in 2008, after polls showed African- Americans much less likely to vote than whites this year.”

With all due respect, Mr. President, the American people appear more inclined to “Change the Guard” than to guard the disastrous change that you have wrought!

Mrs. B.O.: Hell Is Your Just Reward for Betrothing the Devil!

By John W. Lillpop





Poor Michelle Obama.


Despite having 30 or more servants satisfying her every temporal need and wish 24/7 in the White House;

Despite the fame and fortune that accrues to one fortunate enough to be the FLOTUS;

Despite lavish vacations in Europe that cost taxpayers close to one half million dollars;

Despite the full force and service of the Secret Service to protect she and her daughters;

Despite living a life of extravagant leisure and luxury while seven percent of the nation languishes in poverty;

Despite her pampered and protected life, Michelle Obama regards her situation as FLOTUS as “hell,” as least according to a book which quotes acquaintances of Carla Bruni-Sarkozy, France’s first lady.

Sorry, Michelle, but HELL is being unemployed, a situation exacerbated by your husband's anti-business zeal and lack of understanding;

HELL is the huge tax increases about to devastate all taxpayers because of your husband's insolence and arrogance;

HELL is being a senior citizen in frail health during the era of rationed care and death panels, both products of your husband's arrogant destruction of the finest health care system in the world;

HELL is having friend or family in Iraq where American men and women are still engaged in combat, a fact not appreciated by your husband;

HELL is being a parent living in the knowledge that your husband's reckless and irresponsible spending has bloated the federal deficit completely out of control;

HELL is living in Arizona where illegal aliens continue to invade America and where your husband refuses to secure the borders and enforce the laws, and even sues Arizona for defending American citizens from foreign invaders.

Above all else, HELL is living with the devil which you, Michelle, have as your just reward for betrothing the Evil One!

Perhaps America Is NOT a Nation of Imbeciles, After All?

Perhaps America Is NOT a Nation of Imbeciles, After All?



By John W. Lillpop


Back on January 20, 2009, it appeared as though America had lost its collective mind and ability to act intelligently when a dangerously naive community organizer with no real world knowledge or experience was elevated to the most powerful position in the world by voters presumed to have been cleverer than that.

Adding mayhem to misery, the electorate installed a gaggle of dim-witted Marxists in the U.S. Congress, virtually ignoring the need for responsible oversight and the old adage that “Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

Back on that dreary afternoon in January, 2009, it seemed as though America had been abandoned by our Creator and left for dead, to be disposed of like so much human waste by the evil conquerors.

Then on the way to America’s funeral, a funny thing happened, actually several funny things happened:

Our brash new president made his first priority the closure of GITMO, a safe and secure detention center for the most vile and vicious anti-American killers on the planet. With the economy in shambles, why, we wondered, did Barack Obama reach out to terrorists as his first official act?

That was followed by an outrageous “stimulus” bill involving a trillion dollars of taxpayer money. Our president warned that there was no time to debate the bill on its merits—the urgency was too great. He also promised creation or salvation of 3.5 to 4 million jobs.
Then it was off to Cairo and other foreign lands where this ill-informed American politician set about apologizing for U.S. policy and former presidents.

We (the Americans) were wrong was Obama’s bleating cry which was understood to mean “they (George W. Bush and friends” were wrong, but we are here to make it up to the world!

Over the next 19 months, Barack Obama committed atrocity after atrocity in ransacking and attacking American traditions and values.

CHANGE was more important that preservation of our culture, at least in the eyes of our vision less new leader.

On and on it went. And as Obama forged ahead with his agenda to remake everything in America, including the policies and traditions that made America the greatest civilization in human history, a great awakening of American mind and spirit started to emerge.

Despite the distortions and worse from the liberal media and leftist pundits like Katie Couric, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, the New York Times, CNN, etc., the American people began to question what the hell was happening to our once great nation.

How in Hades, we wondered, have we reached the point where a president who steadfastly refuses to secure our borders and enforce the law, actually sues a sovereign American state for defending its people from foreign invaders?

Can it be true that this arrogant man actually reported an American state to the United Nations as an example of human rights violations?

How did we get to the point where the federal government can ORDER citizens to buy health insurance and use the IRS to punish those who refuse?

How is it that the U.S. Congress deliberately ignores its own established rules and procedures for conducting the people’s business in order to pass legislation that the people overwhelming oppose?

Month after month, this hijacking of the American Dream has been taking place right in the front of the American people.

Thankfully, even pro-Obama pap by the leftist media are no longer enough to quell the revolution brewing in the hearts of the American people!

Barack Obama’s presidency is no longer viable. He is a lame duck president, waddling away from members of his own party, for heavens sake, after 20 months of misspent power.

Just as important, election polls now point to a massive dumping of the Marxists in Congress and replacement of same with sane, common sense American loyalists in 50+ days.

Perhaps it is true: America is NOT a nation of complete idiots, after all?

Pray God, deliver us from this nightmare, with the solemn promise that we will never again stray from thy guiding hand!

Frogs With Cajoles Say NO! to Islamic Face Masks!

By John W. Lillpop

The French may be pompous twits and eunuchs in most matters of importance, but when it comes to nipping Muslim anarchy in the bud some Frogs are showing that they are indeed endowed with at least partially-functioning Cajoles.

At issue was a recent proposal to ban the burqa-style Islamic mask that Muslim women favor.

As reported at yahoo.com, in part:

“PARIS – The French Senate on Tuesday overwhelmingly passed a bill banning the burqa-style Islamic veil on public streets and other places, a measure that affects less than 2,000 women but that has been widely seen as a symbolic defense of French values.

“The Senate voted 246 to 1 in favor of the bill in a final step toward making the ban a law — though it now must pass muster with France's constitutional watchdog.

The bill was overwhelmingly passed in July in the lower house, the National Assembly.

“Many Muslims believe the legislation is one more blow to France's No. 2 religion, and risks raising the level of Islamophobia in a country where mosques, like synagogues, are sporadic targets of hate. However, the law's many proponents say it will preserve the nation's values, including its secular foundations and a notion of fraternity that is contrary to those who hide their faces.”

Imagine that—the French Senate is leap years ahead of the U.S. Senate and House when it comes to preserving national identity and values!

Hmm.

Wonder how a similar bill, say, about English being the official U.S. language would fare in the haunted House of the Wicked Witch from the West, or in the U.S. Senate?

How would Barack Obama react to legislation designed to preserve and protect American values, traditions, and culture?

The One would no doubt deliver an eloquent speech in which the “English Is US” bill would be portrayed as racist, discriminatory, and unconstitutional.

Then he would veto the bill, blame W. for the bad economy, strained relations with China, the gas pipe explosion in California, and the bedbug crisis in New York City.

All in the day’s work of a clueless Progressive, in over his head!

Cuba Affirms that Socialism/Communism Does Not Work: Will Obama Listen?

By John W. Lillpop

While Barack Obama and the Democrat Party veer far to the extreme political left in a new and unfunded era of big government Marxism, the tiny Island of Cuba offers an invaluable source for “lessons learned” from a society that has dabbled in socialism and is paying the price for that mistake.

In Cuba, it has taken more than 50 years for former Cuban President Fidel Castro and brother Raul to face reality and accept the fact that socialism/communism is not the answer to anything—especially when living in the shadow of the greatest economic powerhouse in human history.

That 50 year “learning curve” has been an unmitigated disaster for the everyday Cuban people who have lived in abject poverty under a tyrannical dictator whose ego is larger than the island of Cuba itself.

Only within the past few weeks has Fidel Castro come clean with the Cuban people and admitted the complete failure of his and Brother Raul’s dictatorial excesses in providing a decent opportunity for economic stability and social justice.

Way past due for a government that cannot even meet the people’s need for toilet tissue, right?

The latest communist bubble to burst in the faces of the Castro brothers has to do with 500,000 state employees who are about to lose their jobs.

As reported at reference 1, in part:

“Communist Cuba will shift hundreds of thousands of state employees to the private sector in 2011 as the government prunes more than 500,000 workers from its payroll.

“The official trade union federation said on Monday that eventually more than a million jobs would be cut.

“The plan represents the most important reform undertaken by President Raúl Castro since he took over from his brother Fidel in early 2008, and the biggest shift to private enterprise since all 58,000 small businesses were nationalised in 1968.

“The massive layoff of 10 per cent of the state labour force is scheduled to begin in October and stretch through March. New licences for self-employment would be issued beginning in October , the sources said. Geographical limitations on self-employment and prohibitions on obtaining bank credits, doing business with state entities or hiring labour outside the family, would be eliminated.”

Hmm. It would appear as though that tiny island is a veritable treasure cove of “Teaching Opportunities” for slow-learning Marxists in training to the north!


The big question: Will America’s egocentric, narcissist and in-over-his-head president be able to swallow his self-absorption long enough to do what is best for America?




http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4cd17af4-bf5e-11df-965a-00144feab49a.html?ftcamp=rss

Aging Gas Pipes: Another Crisis Not to Be Wasted?

By John W. Lillpop

Barack Obama and his Marxist cohorts in Congress are known to be skilled parasites when it comes to making political hay out of the misery and suffering of others.

A favorite party theme is to “let no crisis go unexploited!”

And with Barack Obama clawing like a caged animal to hold on to his dwindling political influence with mid-term elections just 50 days hence, one cannot help but wonder if the president is privately celebrating the gas pipeline crisis that struck in San Bruno, California last week?

As reported at Yahoonews.com, in part:

“SAN BRUNO, Calif. – An ominous theme has emerged from the wreckage of a deadly pipeline explosion in California: There are thousands of pipes just like it nationwide.

Utilities have been under pressure for years to better inspect and replace aging gas pipes — many of them laid years before the suburbs expanded over them and now at risk of leaking or erupting.

But the effort has fallen short. Critics say the regulatory system is ripe for problems because the government largely leaves it up to the companies to do inspections, and utilities are reluctant to spend the money necessary to properly fix and replace decrepit pipelines.

‘If this was the FAA and air travel we were talking about, I wouldn't get on a plane,’ said Rick Kessler, a former congressional staffer specializing in pipeline safety issues who now works for the Pipeline Safety Trust, an advocacy group based in Bellingham, Wash.”

Thousands of decrepit, dangerous pipelines throughout the nation, eh?

Combine that with the fact that Obama is desperately in search of an “infrastructure” crisis that he can use to justify pumping at least another $50 billion into so as to “stimulate” the Obamanomics economy, which has not yet recovered from the 2009 Obama trillion-dollar mistake, and you have the perfect set-up for another Marxist body blow to the American economy.

Are aging pipes filled with hot gas a legitimate, major concern?

Yes, of course.

However, the hot gas bags that represent the greatest threat to America are named Obama, Pelosi, Reid, and all of the other reckless rascals with a D next to their name.

Bottom Line: Let’s get rid of the incompetent gas bags in Washington, D.C. and elect people with the common sense needed to fix America’s infrastructure!

A Short List of Election Burning Materials for Conservatives

Satire by John W. Lillpop

Now that the 9th anniversary of the September 11 attacks and the related Koran-burning frenzy are behind us, it time to plan for the mid-term elections, which are forecast to bring much-needed CHANGE after 20+ months of insolence and rampant Marxism.

In my household, the five items listed below are on the “Short list” of preferred torchings over the next 50 days:


Audacity of Hope, an oppressed racial minority explains how to manipulate liberal guilt into political power and wealth;

Alleged Birth Certificate for Barry Sorento, Better Known as Barack Hussein Obama, and 44th President of United States;

The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also called the Stimulus, which cost taxpayers one trillion dollars. More than 2,000 Pages. Perfect to Burn for Heat on Cold Wintry Nights;

Dreams of My Father, an oppressed religious minority explains how to finesse religious bigotry into a fancy address in Washington, D.C. Not recommended for children under 18.

The Health Care Reform Bill commonly referred to as the Citizen’s Guide to Parlor Magic. Illustrates how to add 30 million uninsured to the ranks of the insured while reducing overall costs.

There you go—my favorite kindling stuff for the period between now and November.

Happing reading and burning, Patriots!

Devout Muslims: Why Not Leave Desecration of Koran in Allah's Hands?

By John W. Lillpop



Happy September 11 greetings to moderate Muslims all over the world. Please understand that Americans are still in grief and mourning over the devastating attack that incinerated 3,000 innocent Americans back on this day in 2001.

We know and appreciate the fact that the Koran is Holy Scripture to people of the Muslim faith. We also understand that the Koran is seen as the very word of God—Allah—and as such, is to be revered and respected.

Again because of the emotion associated with 9/11/01, there have been Americans who have threatened to burn the Koran. We understand how that would distress and anger devout Muslims.

However, given the fact that Allah is Omnipotent and all powerful, why not leave any retribution of retaliation in His capable hands?

After all, the Koran is His.

Extinquishing the Flame of Free Speech: Good for America?

By John W. Lillpop


Pundits from all political ideologies have sought to portray the Rev. Terry Jones as a crazed pyromaniac with a cross in one hand and a book of matches in the other.

Jones’ insanity is, they suggest, the result of an over dose of exuberant Christianity, a mind-blowing affliction common among unwashed, uneducated and uncivilized white heathen deep in the Old South.

Southern, white, Christian, male? That says it all when it comes to understanding the likes of Reverend Jones!

President Obama, the man who promised to reduce health care costs by adding 30 million uninsured via ObamaCare, even went so far as to call Jones’ Koran burning idea a “stunt.”

A stunt, sir?

Rest assured, Mr. President, that the rage which continues to dwell in the hearts of patriotic Americans over the events of 9/11 is no stunt!

On the other hand,erecting a Muslim mosque next to Ground Zero where 3,000 Americans were incinerated nine years ago is surely a “stunt,” by those eager to provoke hatred and violence.

Incidentally, you did express support for the Ground Zero mosque, did you not, sir? Why then the complete lack of understanding for the impulses of a small-time Christian reverend who, on a good Sunday, manages to entice all of 50 people to his church?

And then only when coffee and cookies are offered as refreshment, free of charge!

Sadly, the media and our befuddled president have made Reverend Jones the focal point of this kerfuffle when, in fact, the reverend is an irrelevant bit player in a much larger controversy.

Indeed, Americans should be very concerned, and down right frightened, when the President of the United States and top military officials urge American citizens to abandon free speech rights in order to pacify terrorists!

How can that be anything but a huge victory for the terrorists?

Would not such a victory be a powerful recruiting tool for Al-Quaeda and others who could claim that they own the power to shut down debate in America?

What other public expressions should be squelched so as not to offend the terrorists?

Should sentiments supporting Jews and Israel be squashed?

Dare we not express our outrage concerning the barbaric and inhumane practice of public stoning in Iran?

Again, ceding free speech rights would usurp liberty, freedom, and the American spirit in our blessed homeland.

Finally, American lives lost in Iraq and Afghanistan to date will have been for naught if the terrorists are permitted to shut down free speech in America.

Why in the world should America voluntarily extinguish the Flame of Free Speech, the linchpin of our cherished freedom?

American Mayor Urgently Needed in LA!

By John W. Lillpop

For the past three nights, the city of Los Angeles has been terrorized by immigrants (illegal?) who are not pleased with the fact that lethal justice was dished out to a drunken Guatemalan who threatened a police officer with an already-bloodied knife.

As reported by the Los Angeles Times, in part:

“Tensions flared Monday in the immigrant neighborhood of Westlake as dozens of protesters and Los Angeles police faced off at the site where a day laborer was fatally shot by police a day earlier.

“The angry crowd gathered at 6th Street and Union Avenue, a bustling corner where Los Angeles Police Department officers said they were confronted Sunday by a knife-wielding man who refused commands to drop his weapon.

“The protesters, claiming the man was unarmed, used a bullhorn to shout in Spanish —
"Assassination!" "Assassination!" and "We want justice!" — as they marched along 6th to the Los Angeles Police Department's Rampart station. Onlookers watched from their apartment windows, while others joined the procession as LAPD officers monitored the action from nearby corners and adjacent streets.

“At one point, police in riot gear faced off with a shouting throng near a series of memorials hung from a fence by the sidewalk where the man was killed on 6th Street. He was identified by friends as Manuel Jamines, 37, a Guatemalan immigrant who came to Los Angeles seven years ago.

"He was not a criminal," said Juan Velasquez, who said he is from the same village as Jamines.”

Of course, the words of Juan Velasquez are to be taken as gospel truth. Indeed, the fact that Velasquez asserted that his pal was not a criminal should be sufficient to cause the arrest and prosecution of of the killer cop.

The sort of irrational nonsense propagated by Velasquez can be blamed on the citizenry of Los Angeles who elected Antonio Villaraigosa.

Villaraigosa is an unapologetic advocate of Sanctuary City status which panders and bows to illegal aliens at the expense of American citizens.

Villaraigosa’s only attribute is that he is not bright enough to pass the California bar, sparing California the grief of another knot-headed, racist attorney!

In truth, Antonio Villaraigosa is more concerned about aiding and abetting illegal immigration than ending the invasion of criminals.

Want to clean-up Los Angeles?

Dump Villaraigosa and install an American as Mayor!

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/sep/07/local/la-me-police-shooting-20100907

Burn, Baby, Burn?

By John W. Lillpop


General David Petraeus is a man of extraordinarily -high moral principles, integrity, and patriotism. His voice is one of honesty, reason and wisdom, commodities strikingly missing among political elitists in Washington, D.C. these days.

When David Petraeus speaks, he deserves to be listened to. His priority is to protect the lives and health of young American men and women serving in harm’s way. As far as we know, General Petraeus bears no hidden agenda which may, or may not, be in the best interests of American troops and the American people.

Notwithstanding his outstanding character and other commendable attributes, it appears as though the General is mistaken when it comes to advising against the “Koran Burning” ceremony planned by Rev. Terry Jones of Florida on September 11.

With all due respect, General Petraeus, if American citizens give up free speech rights in order to pacify terrorists, is that not a huge victory for the terrorists?

Would not such a victory be a powerful recruiting tool for Al-Quaeda and others who could claim that they own the power to shut down debate in America?

What other public expressions should be squelched so as not to offend the terrorists?

Should sentiments supporting Jews and Israel be squashed?

Dare we not express our outrage concerning the barbaric and inhumane practice of public stoning in Iran?

Again, ceding free speech rights would usurp liberty, freedom, and the American spirit in our blessed homeland.

Finally, American lives lost in Iraq and Afghanistan to date will have been for naught if the terrorists are permitted to shut down free speech in America.

In the interest of freedom: Burn, Baby, Burn!

Obama's Un-American Tax Policy

By John W. Lillpop



When it comes to healing America’s ailing economy by cutting taxes, President Obama is all for the idea—unless it benefits the most financially successful Americans.

That would be the “wealthy,” a class of elitists among whom are listed Mr. and Mrs. Barack Obama, current residents of 1600 Pennsylvania, Washington, D.C.

Probability of address change within the next 24 months? High and growing!

Obama’s philosophy on taxes is right out of the leftist handbook for perpetuating economic mayhem and ruin:

1. Although the overwhelming majority of taxes are paid by the so-called rich, cutting taxes for this class of Americans is unthinkable.

After all, most rich people are Republicans, and white, to boot! Why bring relief to white Republicans, even if it will help the overall economy?


2. In contrast, the less successful deserve robust tax cuts, even though they pay little or no taxes to begin with.

In addition, unlike the wealthy, the ranks of the less successful are populated with huge numbers of people of color, every last one of which is a Democrat.

Obama’s goofy logic may be the result of too much interaction with VP Joe Biden who has stated publicly that paying higher taxes is the “patriotic thing to do.”
Obama’s wrong minded policy is hardly a rarity among Democrats who would generally prefer to rip the wealthy than help the poor!

A notable exception, however, is found in Peter Orszag, an economist formerly employed at the Obama White House.

Orszag penned the following words, in part in his new role as a columnist for the New York Times:


“In the face of the dueling deficits, the best approach is a compromise: extend the tax cuts for two years and then end them altogether. Ideally only the middle-class tax cuts would be continued for now. Getting a deal in Congress, though, may require keeping the high-income tax cuts, too. And that would still be worth it.

“Why does this combination make sense? The answer is that over the medium term, the tax cuts are simply not affordable. Yet no one wants to make an already stagnating jobs market worse over the next year or two, which is exactly what would happen if the cuts expire as planned.

“Higher taxes now would crimp consumer spending, further depressing the already inadequate demand for what firms are capable of producing at full tilt. And since financial markets don’t seem at the moment to view the budget deficit as a problem — take a look at the remarkably low 10-year Treasury bond yield — there is little reason not to extend the tax cuts temporarily.”

The problem with Orszag’s spiel is that, although it makes sense in terms of improving the economy, it fails to punish the rich for the heinous crime of being mostly white Republicans!




http://news.firedoglake.com/2010/09/07/orszag-on-tax-cuts-extend-it-to-end-it/