Shocking Story of Illegal Aliens in Denmark

By John W. Lillpop

Thanks to brainwashing by the liberal media and Democrat politicians, we patriotic Americans sometimes forget how truly awful the problem of illegal aliens is here in America.

By the way of comparison, consider this hand-wringing story of the invasion of Denmark by illegals.

As reported in desperation at the reference:

There are enough illegal immigrants in Denmark to populate a medium-sized town, and their numbers are growing, according to estimates from police.

Although pinpointing the exact number of illegal immigrants is difficult, the police approximate that the number is somewhere between 20,000 and 50,000, reports police union magazine Dansk Politi.

Assistant police commissioner Kjeld Farcinsen, who heads the immigration control group in Copenhagen, admitted to Berlingske newspaper that illegal immigration is a growing problem.

“It really doesn’t matter where we search, we always seem to find something.” Farcinsen said in reference to the random inspections the police undertake.

Officials from tax authority Skat are also aware of a rise in illegal immigration, according to public broadcaster DR.
“We’ve definitely seen an increase in cases, especially involving people from developing countries,” Skat spokesperson Christina Steinmetz told DR. “When we arrive they try and escape through windows and backdoors, obviously indicating that they do not want to talk to us.”

The lion’s share of the illegal immigrants are poor, attempting to eke out a life working job such as newspaper deliverers or cleaners and living in shelters or hostels, according to immigration specialists.

Helle Stenum, of Roskilde University, said the police's message should lead to increased attention to the problem of illegal immigration.

“There must be a reason why the police are focusing so heavily on this issue.”

According to the police union, the problem of illegal immigration is not only rising but lacks the necessary attention in the political forum.”

Wow, between 20,000 and 50-000 invaders in Denmark! How DO you cope?

Good grief, California has more than 50,000 illegals in our jails and prisons alone!

Even more startling: The entire population of Denmark is estimated at 5.5 million.

In what used to be the United States of America, there are at least three times that many illegal invaders squatting in our-once blessed home!

The Denmark budget calls for expenditures of about $128 billion a year. US taxpayers dole out more than $110 billion a year to support the illegal alien free loaders and scam artists here unlawfully.

Even worse, America is haunted by a major political party (Democrat) that actually wants as many illegal aliens to come here as possible.

Our president is working against the interests of American citizens by refusing to secure the borders against further invasions, and is refusing to deport invaders already here.

Count your blessings, Denmark! Your “problem” seems trivial in comparison to what “progressive” idiocy has dumped on America.


Has NO ONE Read the ObamaCare Manifesto?

By John W. Lillpop

Going into the March 26-28 Supreme Court hearings on the Big Government Bill of Rights—also known as ObamaCare—it was obvious that this 2,700 pages of propaganda had pissed off scores of millions of Americans who, for the most part, had not actually read a single page from the bloated and, as we now surmise, unconstitutional blathering stuffed with outright lies and gross exaggerations, all of which advocate on behalf of this tragic waste of paper.

Going in, it was common knowledge that Congress critters charged with voting Yeah or Nay had not bothered to read the document, a fact certified by the lame-brained Nancy Pelosi who urged passage so that we could then find out what was actually in the bill.

That is the sort of logic that would cause one to demand an autopsy on a living person to determine if said individual has any life-threatening maladies.

Although we knew full well that no one in Congress had read the damn thing, we were shocked to learn that Supreme Court Justices Scalia and Breyer had avoided the read based on protections against cruel and unusual punishment as set forth in the 8th Amendment.

All of which leads to the burning question: Has anyone on the planet read ObamaCare, and if so, why?


Are Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton Addicted to Racial Unrest?

By John W. Lillpop

After watching Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton do their level best to ignite a race war over the Trayvon Martin tragedy, one wonders:

Is a brutal, racially-motivated slaying something that these people secretly wish for? Are they so pathetically sick that the only thing which can bring excitement to their hearts is the stalking of an innocent, unarmed black man and slaughter of same in the streets?

In other words, are folks like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton addicted to the adrenaline- high achieved during a race riot or similar civil disturbance, regardless of whether or not the facts support such overreactions?

Do they secretly yearn for the “good old days” of the 60s and 70s when marches and riots could be counted on to add a little zest to one’s life, not to mention a little booty to one’s wallet?

Enter Herman Cain, former Republican presidential candidate and an African-American who seems more interested in resolving racial differences than in generating free publicity for himself.

As reported at the reference, Herman Cain said the following about the Trayvon Martin tragedy:

“Fox News host Martha McCallum also asked the former presidential candidate for his thoughts on the shooting of Trayvon Martin. Cain said it was "a tragic, unfortunate death of a young man."

He then pivoted to the threats being made against the shooter, George Zimmerman, by the New Black Panthers, who have offered a $10,000 bounty for a citizen's arrest of Zimmerman. Cain said that people should be "just as outraged" by the threats as they are about the death of Martin:

“The first question is, where's the investigation? If Congressman Rush wanted to bring attention to the right problem, where is the investigation? All of the swirling rhetoric is not helping. This was a tragic, unfortunate death of a young man. The investigation should be the thing that would bring all of the facts and put them on the table before people continue with all of the swirling rhetoric.

The second bad thing about this -- where is the Justice Department relative to the threats being made by the Black Panthers, relative to this particular case? I'm not defending him or anybody else, I'm just saying, we have due process in this country. It generally starts with an investigation. We don't have the investigation or the facts. And secondly, when an organization or some people make some direct threats on any other citizen -- without having been tried -- that is illegal and the Justice Department ought to be doing something.

We should be just as outraged about that as we are about the death of this young man.”

Compare those words to the angry accusations issued by Jackson and Sharpton which accuse George Zimmerman of racially-motivated murder.

Of course it is easy for Herman Cain to be so reasonable. After all, he is not in the business of making his living by manipulating racial issues for profit!


Some Good News About ObamaCare from SCOTUS!

By John W. Lillpop

From Washington, D.C. came good news from the Associates reviewing the Marxist nightmare known as ObamaCare.

To begin with, the country has finally found out what is in the 2,700 pages of tyranny passed by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and signed by the namesake of the fiasco, Barack Obama.

It took more than two years of leftist spinning and outright lies for truth to will out, but the conservative justices took just three days to distill all the BS into plain English:

ObamaCare is a highly flawed, unconstitutional and feeble attempt by Obama and his Democratic demons to “Fundamentally Change America” from a liberty-based system of free market enterprise into a Marxist nanny state where people like Nancy Pelosi are in charge of critical life and death decisions best left in the hands of intelligent citizens.
In other words, Ms. Pelosi, conservatives on the court discovered what exactly is in the foolish bill. Suffice it to say, they were not amused.

Of course, that could change before a final decision is rendered, but gambling people are betting that ObamaCare will join the Obama “Stimulus Plan,” the push for $8 a gallon gas, closure of GITMO, handling of the federal deficit, the Solyndra mess, Fast and Furious and other humungous flops in the Barack Obama Loser’s Hall of Fame!

Democrats like Harry Reid reflected the general atrophy that appears to be ravaging the minds of leftists when he claimed that Democrat fortunes in the November elections might actually be improved if ObamaCare were to be discarded like a stinky old newspaper ripped from the floor of a bird cage.

Justice Scalia made peace of mind for millions of Americans a lot easier when he seemed to shoot down the notion of government dictating what people eat, as in an “Michelle Care” scheme, that would required consumption of copious amounts of salt-less, butter-less, and tasteless broccoli by enslaved Americans addicted to burgers, fries, and creamy milk shakes.

Thanks for that Judge!

By the way, in the interest of cutting down the costs of government why didn’t the nine of you take up the “Birther Issue” while you were all together?

You know, throw out the offending baby along with the dirty bath water!

Perhaps next time?

Some Good News About ObamaCare from SCOTUS!

By John W. Lillpop

From Washington, D.C. came good news from the Associates reviewing the Marxist nightmare known as ObamaCare.

To begin with, the country has finally found out what is in the 2,700 pages of tyranny passed by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and signed by the namesake of the fiasco, Barack Obama.

It took more than two years of leftist spinning and outright lies for truth to will out, but the conservative justices took just three days to distill all the BS into plain English:

ObamaCare is a highly flawed, unconstitutional and feeble attempt by Obama and his Democratic demons to “Fundamentally Change America” from a liberty-based system of free market enterprise into a Marxist nanny state where people like Nancy Pelosi are in charge of critical life and death decisions best left in the hands of intelligent citizens.
In other words, Ms. Pelosi, conservatives on the court discovered what exactly is in the foolish bill. Suffice it to say, they were not amused.

Of course, that could change before a final decision is rendered, but gambling people are betting that ObamaCare will join the Obama “Stimulus Plan,” the push for $8 a gallon gas, closure of GITMO, handling of the federal deficit, the Solyndra mess, Fast and Furious and other humungous flops in the Barack Obama Loser’s Hall of Fame!

Democrats like Harry Reid reflected the general atrophy that appears to be ravaging the minds of leftists when he claimed that Democrat fortunes in the November elections might actually be improved if ObamaCare were to be discarded like a stinky old newspaper ripped from the floor of a bird cage.

Justice Scalia made peace of mind for millions of Americans a lot easier when he seemed to shoot down the notion of government dictating what people eat, as in an “Michelle Care” scheme, that would required consumption of copious amounts of salt-less, butter-less, and tasteless broccoli by enslaved Americans addicted to burgers, fries, and creamy milk shakes.

Thanks for that Judge!

By the way, in the interest of cutting down the costs of government why didn’t the nine of you take up the “Birther Issue” while you were all together?

You know, throw out the offending baby along with the dirty bath water!

Perhaps next time?


Americans Deserve Much Better Than Barack Obama!

By John W. Lillpop

As the days leading to the 2012 elections grow fewer, Americans need to face the fact that Barack Obama is not the candidate in whom voters should entrust the future of our children and grandchildren, nor the very future of our nation.

Over the past three plus years, Obama has demonstrated over and over again that he:

* Holds deep, impassioned resentments against the American way of life including capitalism, dominance of the Christian faith, desire to reflect Exceptionalism, and culture. Obama even resents the fact that America is mostly an English-speaking nation will little or no desire for foreign languages to interlope into our education, law, and daily lives.

* Has very little respect, or none, for American history and the principles on which this nation was founded, including those which have made America the most successful society in human history, and which have enabled he and his family to prosper so richly.

* Is scornful of established laws and traditions including those which concern American sovereignty, states’ rights, religious freedom, and immigration.

* Uses class, race, income, education and other ways in which people differ to pit Americans against each other, all to promote his own selfish political ambitions.

* Is naïve and ill-informed when it comes to the urgent need for a strong national defense, a prejudice which is particularly dangerous given the hostile world in which we live. Foolishly adheres to the Progressive myth which holds that “talking” with our enemies (Iran) can solve problems, when the opposite is generally true.

* Foolishly refuses to admit that there are genuinely “bad” people and nations who want to kill Americans and America.

* Does not grasp the inherent danger in reckless spending and irresponsible accumulation of federal debt. Despite the downgrade of America’s credit and warnings of further damage, has refused to take responsible action to address entitlements and other out-of-control spending.

* Believes that America should be fundamentally transformed to reflect his socialist agenda, despite the fact that most Americans disagree strongly. ObamaCare is but one example.

As if Obama’s warped vision were not bad enough, he is a man of enormous ego who believes that he is the smartest, wisest man in the room, an attitude which results in arrogance fueled by ignorance that causes him to discount and reject opposing views.

All in all, Barack Obama is simply not the man for the presidency.

America deserves better! Much better.


Obama Comforts Kin of Trayvon Martin: What About Family of Brian Terry, Mr. President?

By John W. Lillpop

President Obama used the Bully Pulpit of the U.S. presidency to raise public awareness about the killing of an unarmed black teenager in Florida last month, and to comfort the loved ones left behind by the 17-year old.

As reported at reference 1, Obama waxed personal about the tragic incident involving Trayvon Martin:

President Barack Obama weighed into the controversial killing of a black teenager in Florida in very personal terms on Friday, comparing the boy to a son he doesn't have and calling for American "soul searching" over how the incident occurred.

Seventeen-year-old Trayvon Martin, dressed in a "hoodie" sweatshirt, was shot dead a month ago in Sanford, Florida by a 28-year-old white Hispanic neighborhood watch volunteer who said he was acting in self-defense.

"If I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon," Obama said in his first comments about the shooting, acknowledging the racial element in the case.

"Obviously, this is a tragedy," Obama told reporters. "I can only imagine what these parents are going through. And when I think about this boy, I think about my own kids."

The case has rippled across the nation and prompted rallies protesting the failure of the police to arrest the shooter, George Zimmerman, and, more broadly, a pattern of racial discrimination black leaders cite in Sanford and elsewhere in the country.”

It is worth noting that Florida has a “Stand Your Ground” law which allows the use of lethal force for self-defense. It is that law which shooter George Zimmerman is using to justify the shooting.

Nearly a month after the shooting, Zimmerman has not been charged with any crime, again based on the Stand Your Ground defense.

While it is unclear if the killing of Trayvon Martin was, in fact, legally justified, the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry in 2011 was a result of illegal actions by the federal government as part of the reprehensible operation knows as “Fast and Furious.”

In that murder, Brian Terry was shot and killed near Rio Rico, Arizona, while attempting to apprehend a group of armed subjects. The suspects had been preying on illegal immigrants with the intent to rob them.

Agent Terry and several other agents were attempting to arrest the group when shots were exchanged between the suspects and agents. Agent Terry was struck in the pelvis by a round fired by a suspect armed with an AK-47.

To date, President Obama has issued no apology or words of sympathy to the family of Brian Terry.

Brian Terry, let the record show, was a Caucasian working to defend the United States when he was slain.

Why no presidential outcry over the death of a border patrol agent whose death can be linked to unlawful action by the Obama administration, Mr. President?

Reference 1:



Rick Santorum Driven to the “Dark Side”?

By John W. Lillpop

Throughout the brutal, exasperating trials and tribulations of the Republican nominating fiasco, all of the candidates seemed bonded by one essential truth:

Another term in office for Barack Obama would mean the end of America as we know it and was to be avoided at all costs!

Indeed, it was expected that when a nominee was finally selected, the unsuccessful candidates would immediately shed ego and false pride in favor of doing what is best for America.

Namely, work to end the Marxist tyranny imposed by Obama and return our blessed homeland to what the founding fathers envisioned 235 years ago.

Unfortunately, that presumption of unity was shattered to tatters by Rick Santorum in a shocking act of treason in which the former Senator appeared to migrate over to the “Dark Side” by declaring that reelecting Obama would be preferable to electing Mitt Romney.

As reported at the reference:

“Presidential candidate Rick Santorum on Thursday said Republicans should give President Barack Obama another term if Santorum isn’t the GOP nominee and for a second day compared rival Mitt Romney to an Etch A Sketch toy.

Santorum reiterated an argument he has made before: The former Massachusetts governor is not conservative enough to offer voters a clear choice in the fall election and that only he can provide that contrast.

“You win by giving people a choice,” Santorum said during a campaign stop in Texas. “You win by giving people the opportunity to see a different vision for our country, not someone who’s just going to be a little different than the person in there.”

Santorum added: “If they’re going to be a little different, we might as well stay with what we have instead of taking a risk of what may be the Etch A Sketch candidate for the future.”

Clearly, the time has come to end the ridiculous spectacle know as the GOP primary process before further harm can be done to the party (and the nation) by malcontent Republicans whose shattered egos have caused them to see Darkness at the end of the tunnel, and have accepted the Darth Raider invitation to join the Dark Side.

May the force abandon you as you have abandoned America, Senator Santorum!



Two Years On, ObamaCare No Longer Feted with Red Roses!

By John W. Lillpop

Two years ago, when Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid succeeded in ramming ObamaCare down the throats of an unwilling American public, liberal lunatics like Markos Moulitsas, purveyor of the Daily Kos, celebrated with words of praise and thanksgiving for the Marxist trio.

Back then, the mood was all about joy and celebration for the shocking victory by the Democrat-controlled Congress.

So emphatic was the joy, that Daily Kos sent Nancy Pelosi 1,000 red roses to honor the then-Speaker of the House for her great accomplishment as described at the reference:

“Given how much serious ass she kicked in herding cats, twisting arms and otherwise corralling 219 Democrats into passing the most sweeping (if flawed) overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system in 45 years, I thought it would be a great idea to do a repeat of the famous 2004 Barbara Boxer Rose Campaign to celebrate Speaker Pelosi's 70th birthday.”

Since then, of course, Pelosi was handed her head in the 2010 elections and ObamaCare is avoided like the plague by Democrats facing elections in 2012.

CBO has estimated that the cost of ObamaCare will reach $1.7 trillion dollars, rather than the $900 billion that Obama used to sell his snake oil scheme.

And NOBODY is even mentioning the 2nd anniversary of this horrendous mistake, except Republicans looking to cash in politically on the worst law ever enacted!

Roses? Only deep dark black roses allowed this year!



Whatever Happened to Obama Righteous Indignation Over Finance Spending?

By John W. Lillpop

During the 2009 State of the Union address, President Barack Obama used sharp, pointed language to rail against the Supreme Court for that body’s reversal of legislation to limit campaign spending.

Obama’s words and body language conveyed deep disagreement and resentment based on Obama’s self-righteous indignation over the issue.

As reported at the reference, in part, Obama slammed the SCOTUS for opening the flood gates to special interests.

His exact words:

"Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests — including foreign corporations — to spend without limit in our elections," Obama said. "Well I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests, or worse, by foreign entities. They should be decided by the American people, and that’s why I’m urging Democrats and Republicans to pass a bill that helps to right this wrong."
Obama’s indignation, however, has given way to political expediency when it comes to his reelection campaign which, according to Reference 2, in part, may rake in a cool one billion dollars:

"President Obama's re-election campaign raked in $42 million last quarter, which, added to the Democratic National Committee's $26 million, brought the joint Obama-DNC haul for 2011 to roughly $250 million. Impressive, yes, but less so when you consider the Obama campaign's reported $1 billion target — talked up by some Democrats and plenty of Republicans, but dismissed as "bullsh**t" by Obama campaign manager Jim Messina and now clearly out of reach. In fact, says Glenn Thrush in Politico, the "myth of Obama's 'billion-dollar' money bomb" may have convinced Dems that Obama has the fundraising locked up, and dissuaded them from donating.”

Of course, the need for ungodly amounts of cash is made absolutely necessary by the fact that the Obama Presidency has been a complete and unmitigated failure. Indeed, it may take every single penny in that billion-dollar cache to give Obama any sort of chance at fooling the American people a second time this November.

As usual, Obama is a hypocrite through and through. The man has allegiance to no principle of decency: He operates on the theory of “Its my way or the highway!”

Corruption must be stomped out at all costs: Except when it comes to the Obama brand!

Wake up America: We desperately need regime change right here at home!

Ref 1


Ref 2


Time to End Political Circus, Get Behind Mitt, & Defeat Obama!

By John W. Lillpop

Mitt Romney had a huge evening Tuesday. To begin with, the former Governor of Massachusetts put another 41 delegates in his growing arsenal, the reward for a twelve- point shellacking of Rick Santorum.

Even more important than any single state win, Romney has managed to finally capture support from the Tea Party as reported in part at reference 1:

“The organization that ignited the tea party as a national mass movement gave Mitt Romney perhaps his biggest victory yet, deciding to drop its opposition to his candidacy, a top executive in the group told The Washington Times.

FreedomWorks, which organized the Sept. 12, 2009, mass demonstration on the Mall, says that while it will not give an explicit endorsement, the time has come for Republicans to unite around the former Massachusetts governor and focus on defeating President Obama.”

Bravo to that, even though as a Mormon, Mitt probably does not consume “strong drink” as coffee and tea are called in the LDS faith.

Then came the endorsement of Jeb Bush as reported at reference 2:

“Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush endorsed Mitt Romney after Romney’s lopsided win in Illinois Tuesday night. The former Florida Governor – a Republican heavyweight – called on members of the party to coalesce behind Romney.

“Congratulations to Governor Mitt Romney on his win last night and to all the candidates for a hard fought, thoughtful debate and primary season,” said Bush in a statement.

“Primary elections have been held in thirty-four states, and now is the time for Republicans to unite behind Governor Romney and take our message of fiscal conservatism and job creation to all voters this fall. I am endorsing Mitt Romney for our Party’s nomination. We face huge challenges, and we need a leader who understands the economy, recognizes more government regulation is not the answer, believes in entrepreneurial capitalism and works to ensure that all Americans have the opportunity to succeed.”

Bravo again, and thanks to Jeb Bush for choosing to not upset the apple cart with an ill-advised, late run for the roses on his own.

Now that Mitt Romney is “almost there,” Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum should hold a united press conference to acknowledge what seems most probable: Mitt Romney will be the nominee for the Republican Party.
They should release their delegates to Romney and agree to campaign where and when Romney needs their help.

Come on Republicans. Time to set aside differences and coalesce behind the man who can and will defeat Barack Obama and bring America back to the real world.

Reference 1

Reference 2



Russian Soldiers & Arms In Syria to Assist in Slaughter of Rebels: Whither President Obama?

By John W. Lillpop

On March 29, 2011, President Obama addressed the nation and unleashed a blast of his world-class, soaring rhetoric to justify military action in Libya, a nation in conflict, but where said conflict did not involve any national interest, direct or indirect, of these United States.

Obama’s exact words from that date:

“Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different. And as president, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action.”

Obama’s high-minded, conscience-driven rhetoric from nearly a year ago seems to have gone missing with respect to atrocities in Syria where the regime of President Bashar al-Assad has killed more than 8,000 Syrian rebels.

The war in Syria intensified significantly with the arrival of soldiers and weapons from Russia, sent to help Assad commit genocide against Syrian rebels.

As reported in part at the reference:

A Russian military unit has arrived in Syria, according to Russian news reports, a development that a United Nations Security Council source told ABC News was "a bomb" certain to have serious repercussions.

Russia, one of President Bashar al-Assad's strongest allies despite international condemnation of the government's violent crackdown on the country's uprising, has repeatedly blocked the United Nations Security Council's attempts to halt the violence, accusing the U.S. and its allies of trying to start another war.

Now the Russian Black Sea fleet's Iman tanker has arrived in the Syrian port of Tartus on the Mediterranean Sea with an anti-terror squad from the Russian Marines aboard according to the Interfax news agency. The Assad government has insisted it is fighting a terrorist insurgency. The Russian news reports did not elaborate on the Russian troops' mission in Syria or if they are expected to leave the port.

The presence of Russian troops in Syria could be a "pretty obvious" show of support to the regime, according to Russian security expert Mark Galeotti.”

As Syrian rebels are slaughtered in the streets, President Obama fills his days and nights with fundraising events to raise campaign cash and with other political actions focused on the November elections.

Once again, this failed president has sent a loud and clear message to the world: America is no longer a moral and military leader and cannot be relied on to speak out for justice and freedom!



Time to Replace Constitution with "Health & Happiness" Mandate?

Time to Replace U.S. Constitution With “Health & Happiness” Mandate?

By John W. Lillpop

Granted that conservatives are not always the sharpest knives in the drawer. We right-wingers sometimes have difficulty grasping the deep, elusive logic that comes so effortlessly to intellectual elitists like Barack Obama, especially as concerns great and serious questions concerning the U.S. Constitution.

For example, we find it difficult to understand how it is that man who invented ObamaCare, which may be found unconstitutional in the highest court of the land, feels qualified to unilaterally decide that the Defense of Marriage Act, law of the land for 15 years, is suddenly in violation of the Constitution, thereby freeing himself from the responsibility to defend said law in fulfillment of his Oath of Office.

What next, Mr. President?

According to unreliable sources, it appears that President Obama will make a major announcement that will CHANGE everything in America.

The gist of that announcement: The U.S. Constitution is unconstitutional because women and racial, sexual preference, and religious minorities were all under represented in 1776.

Indeed, without any openly gay men or transgender people involved in the crafting of the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, all such documents must be declared null and void.

Other excluded minorities include women, lesbians, terrorists, and illegal aliens. Without factoring in the wishes and needs of terrorists and illegal aliens how in the world can our democracy function?

The answer, of course, is that it cannot, which is why Obama will soon declare it unconstitutional!

At first blush, the very notion that the Constitution is to be dumped seems radical and unpatriotic. However, careful consideration of the issues involved, with an open mind and no bias, indicate that the Constitution, in fact, is a hindrance to the pursuit of happiness in America.

Indeed, why in the world should the sophisticated people of America living in 2012 be limited by a document that fails to mention e-mails, the rights of transgender people, broadband internet connections, the inalienable right of women to kill, at will, human babies not yet born, and mobile apps for viewing pornography at work?

How is it that this document, so very long in the tooth, still survives despite the fact that those who authored it were slave owners, abusers of women, and, truth be told, the most illegal of illegal invaders ever to invade America?

What form of voter ID was in place to assure that the framers were eligible to set the rules which favored white, straight Christian males to the exclusion of everyone else?

A suitable remedy to the problems with the Constitution should be pursued as soon as possible. Scholars like me believe that an all-inclusive “Health and Happiness Mandate” should replace the old-school documents from the 1770s and bring America up to speed with the rest of civilized society.

Key provisions in the Mandate would include:

 A right to free health care for all, citizens and illegals alike;
 Guaranteed free college education for all, including appropriate “adjustments” to enhance the performance of disadvantaged students whom, because of racism and other forms of bigotry, fail to qualify for graduation based on merits alone;
 Strengthening of “hate” laws to punish bullies;
 Right to a three-bedroom, two full bath ranch home on ¼ acre, free of charge to those who earn less than $100,000 a year;
 Right to free birth control and abortions as needed for all women not over the age of 63;
 Free upgrading of the homes of all to include the latest technology in entertainment;
 Guaranteed employment for life with a base salary of $88,000 plus full benefits and pension;
 Suitable transportation for all in the underclass;
 Whatever the Democrat Party may deem essential to satisfy the malcontent among the 99 percent who make up the real America.

Of course, if Obama really gave a tinker’s dam about the Constitution, he would scrap his outrageous law suits against the states of Arizona, Alabama, and South Carolina for protecting their citizens from invaders.

He would move to scrap ObamaCare, which was rammed down the throats of unwilling Americans with legislative sleight of hands and bribery when the votes were not there to follow the rules.

He would understand that forcing citizens to purchase health care insurance, or face the ravages of the IRS, is barbaric and unconstitutional.

He would understand that the Constitution is very specific when it comes to the eligibility of any person to serve as president. Thus, he would make every effort to be completely honest and transparent with the American people concerning questions about his own eligibility.

He would understand that the Constitution sets forth provisions for separation of powers, meant to assure that the Executive Branch is accountable to the people through the oversight function performed by Congress.

He would understand that installation of stealth Czars in order to circumvent Congressional oversight is a repudiation of the Constitution.

He would understand that voter intimidation by the New Black Panther Party is not acceptable simply because the intimidated are not people of color.

He would understand that actions taken to grant rights reserved for citizens to terrorists are anti-American acts of treason.

He would understand that the Constitution requires the president to secure our borders and enforce our immigration laws so as to protect the American people.

He would understand that it is the president’s Constitutional obligation to serve as America’s Commander-in-Chief, which requires him to use war powers prudently to defend the American people, rather than using those powers as political footballs.

Above all else, if he were genuine, President Obama would understand that the will of the people should be the first priority for any political entity wishing to govern, and that that applies to taxes, illegal invasions, health care, terrorists, and all major issues of the day.

The fact is that Barack Obama views the Constitution as an impediment to his Marxist agenda.


Santorum Porn Hysteria Belies “Small Government” Claim

By John W. Lillpop

J.J. Jackson wrote a piece recently about Rick Santorum and his hysteria about pornography.

With all due respect to Santorum and his presidential candidacy, the notion that government needs to involve itself with pornography is more akin to big government thinking than anything Obama and his Marxist monks have advanced in three years of occupying Washington.

Our nation faces withering challenges to our economic prosperity, military superiority, educational standards, and preservation of constitutional law and democratic standards.

Battling on behalf of those principles should be the greatest priority for our elected officials . Concerning themselves with a benign form of entertainment which may offend some, but arguably harms none, would be a fool’s mission unworthy of a nickel of taxpayer money.

Pornography has been adjudicated through the highest courts in the land and has been found to be legitimate form of speech, worthy of protection, rather than assault, by over zealous government loons.

Using pornography as a form of entertainment is a highly personal choice. Santorum chooses not to participate and that is fine.

However, others see the issue differently.

People like Santorum who claim to be in favor of less intrusive and smaller government need to maintain those standards, especially when it comes to respecting the rights of those have beliefs different from their own.


Second Most Corrupt Politician from Illinois Finally Tastes of Justice!

By John W. Lillpop

Next to Barack Obama, Rod Blagojevich is the most corrupt politician to hail from---shudder---the Land of Lincoln.

Blago’s corrupt ways and presumption that he could fool everyone all of the time, gave way to reality and a chain and ball on Thursday as the former Governor of Illinois checked in for his next gig, a fourteen year stint at Federal Correctional Institution Englewood.

Hello, Colorado!

From this point forward and continuing until sometime in 2026, Blagojevich has been reduced to just a number, namely No. 40892-424, the discrete number assigned to this thug as his Inmate identity.

Despite the 10-pounds of unruly hair atop his criminal head and the non-stop motor mouth that got him this far in life, the slime-blasted associate of Barack Obama has fourteen dreary years in which to ponder his life and how things might have been different if only he were not such a complete A-hole!

As reported at the reference, while Blago was spending his first night in prison, Barack Obama was booked to the gills with two fundraisers in Chicago and three more in Atlanta:

Night One is now over.

Rod Blagojevich, former Illinois governor, long-time political ally and picnic pal of Barack Obama and loud-mouthed mediagenic felon, is now Inmate No. 40892-424, a resident of Federal Correctional Institution Englewood, just outside Denver.

He's scheduled to reside there for the next 14 years after his conviction on 18 counts of corruption, including trying to sell or trade his gubernatorial nomination to fill President-elect Obama's empty U.S. Senate seat.

Barring a presidential pardon, Blago must serve at least 85% of his sentence. On his scheduled release his two daughters will be 29 and 22.

The 55-year-old Blagojevich is the second consecutive Illinois governor to go from the statehouse to the big house and carries on a long tradition of corrupt Chicago machine politicians joining correctional institutions.

For some strange reason, local police and prosecutors seem unable to unearth these crooked public employees. So, it's usually the feds cracking open a corner of the Democratic political operation that has controlled the Windy City since Mayor Anton Cermak began constructing the omnipotent apparatus back in the 1930s. President Obama will attend two Chicago fundraisers today and three more tonight in Atlanta. “

According to sources close to Obama, although the president feels sorry for Mrs. Blagojevich and the two daughters that the Blagojevich marriage yielded, the president is all about law and order and the rule of law, and, keeping his own sorry posterior out of prison for as long as possible.

Asked about a presidential pardon for Blago, Obama reported commented, that his power to free Blago is “F------“ Golden, and “I'm just not giving it up for f--- nothing."

Hmmm. That sounds very familiar, doesn’t it?



Bill Maher’s Idiocy: OK to Trash Women—If They Are Republicans, That Is!

By John W. Lillpop

The tragic story involving Sandra Fluke, Rush Limbaugh, and Barack Obama has taken a turn for the worse what with the convoluted logic advanced by Democrat apologist and benefactor Bill Maher who has tried to justify his use of highly vulgar language against women.

According to Maher, it was terribly wrong for Limbaugh to call Fluke a slut and prostitute, but perfectly OK for him to call Sarah Palin a “C***,” which is on the FCC list of “Seven Dirty Words” and not fit for broadcast.

And Maher’s argument is---?

Well, to begin with, Palin is a Republican conservative, which in and of itself qualifies any female for immediate membership in the Maher “C***” Hall of Fame.

Then there is this garbled babble which Maher actually thinks makes good sense:

“To compare that to Rush is ridiculous – he went after a civilian about very specific behavior, that was a lie, speaking for a party that has systematically gone after women’s rights all year, on the public airwaves. I used a rude word about a public figure who gives as good as she gets, who’s called people ‘terrorist’ and ‘unAmerican.’ Sarah Barracuda.”

Got that?

According to this brain-dead lefty, the term “un-American”
is on equal footing with “C***”? And using that term against a woman who just happens to be a public figure is acceptable?

Good grief, where was this loser hatched? Is Maher lacking respect for all women in public life? How about ding-bats like Nancy Pelosi?

If Maher had even the slightest respect for women, he would declare that it is wrong to use that sort of language (slut, C***, etc.) against any woman, regardless of political affiliation and public posture.

One small ray of sunshine appeared when Obama strategist David Axelrod cancelled his scheduled appearance on Maher’s HBO show. Now just talk your boss into refusing to accept Maher’s tainted $1 million gift, David, and you will be making a moral stand for women—all women-- against the likes of Maher.

In the mean time, it’s time for women and men of all political persuasions to push back by writing HBO to demand that Bill Maher’s anti-women hatred be yanked from the airwaves—NOW!

Write HBO at:

1100 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036 United States

Do it for the women!


Afghanistan’s President to President Obama: Get Out!

By John W. Lillpop

In an ominious new sign that the United States has lost control in Afghanistan, President Hamid Karzai has issued an “eviction notice” to the owner of that war, that being the alleged US Commander-in-Chief, Barack Obama.

As reported at the reference, in part:

“Afghanistan wants to take over control of the nation's security in 2013 not 2014 and for US troops to pull out of villages, President Hamid Karzai said Thursday, just days after a US soldier massacred 16 villagers.

Karzai told visiting US defense chief Leon Panetta that "Afghanistan is ready to take overall security responsibility", a statement from his office said.

"Our demand is that this process should be executed sharply and the responsibility should be handed over to Afghans."

Karzai said both sides should work together so that the process of handing security from international troops to Afghan forces would be completed in 2013 rather than 2014, the statement said.

The president also wants the United States to pull all its troops out of villages, where they have outposts, and relocate them in their bases.”

Being evicted after touting the Afghanistan theater as the “Smart” war must be a bitter pill for Obama to swallow, especially in an election year!

Perhaps if the president had only focused on winning the war rather than using it as a political football things might have ended differently?

In any event, this should put an end to the incessant babbling among liberal media types about Obama’s terrific ‘foreign policy’ successes. Just as he has with domestic issues, Obama has made a mess out of American foreign policy.

Which brings up an interesting point: While George W. Bush was president, Senate Democrat Leader Harry Reid took great pains to declare that “this war is lost” with reference to Iraq. In fact, that was not the case until January 20, 2009, when the mantle of power was placed in the naive hands of Barack Obama.

So, what say you, Harry Reid, about Obama’s “smart” war? Lost is it?

Or perhaps Obama can save face by making another foolish apology and changing his stupid time line to NOW?


Lower Heating Bills: A Positive Benefit to Global Warming?

By John W. Lillpop

Global warming, if such phenomenon actually exists, has been much maligned over the past 20 years by such luminaries as Al Gore, Katie Couric, Prince Charles, Nancy Pelosi and other great minds of modern science.

As reported in part at the reference, the bad rap pinned on global warming is being tempered by the fact that millions of Americans are saving hundreds of dollars this winter on home heating costs:

Temperatures in Milwaukee hit a record high Thursday, as the winter that nearly wasn't delivers more savings on home heating costs.

Record warmth this winter means the typical We Energies natural gas customer will save about $120 this winter on heating costs compared with the winter of 2010-'11, the utility said Wednesday.

Combined with low natural gas prices, the warm winter in southeastern Wisconsin prompted We Energies to revise its heating forecast for the second straight month.

A typical We Energies customer paid $391 between November and February, or $100 less than last winter. That's less than any of the previous nine winters, the utility said.

If normal weather holds for the last six weeks of the winter heating season and the price of natural gas remains stable, the utility is forecasting a total winter heating bill for a typical customer of $540, down 18% from $660 last winter.

Until February, utility customers were told to expect a drop of 4% to 5% in heating costs this winter. Last month, the utility updated its numbers based on the warm start to the heating season and forecast a 15% drop.

For the 1 million natural gas customers of We Energies, the winter heating season runs from November through April. So far this season, only two winters have been warmer since 1891, according to National Weather Service heating degree days data compiled by the utility.

In Madison, Wisconsin Power & Light Co. customers have saved 11.5% between October and the end of February, spokesman Steve Schultz said. That translates to savings of about $62 so far for a typical WP&L customer.

A mild weather pattern that has been over the region since the snowstorm early last week sent temperatures to a record 78 degrees in Milwaukee on Wednesday. The previous high for March 14 was 76 degrees, set in 1995. Temperatures in Madison also hit a record 78 degrees, the Weather Service said.

The milder winter also means that less coal is being burned for heat which in turn reduces global warming!

Regrettably, the savings in heating costs are more than offset by the monster rise in gasoline prices, brought to the market by the antics of Barack Obama and Victor Chu.

Which proves that government run by Democrats is always less efficient than simply allowing Mother Nature to do her thing!



ObamaCare Costs Nearly Double! What To Do?

John W. Lillpop

Did anyone really believe Barack Obama and his Marxist minions when they promised that ObamaCare would add 30 million people to the ranks of the insured, while reducing overall health care costs, and cutting the deficit?

Other than a few million dim-witted Democrat leeches, that is?

Confirming that simple arithmetic is invaluable in debunking most of Obama’s outrageous Marxist proposals, the Congressional Budget office has released a new projection which nearly doubles the estimated cost of Obama’s Unconstitutional meddling over the next ten years.

As reported at the reference in part:

President Obama's national health care law will cost $1.76 trillion over a decade, according to a new projection released today by the Congressional Budget Office, rather than the $940 billion forecast when it was signed into law.

Democrats employed many accounting tricks when they were pushing through the national health care legislation, the most egregious of which was to delay full implementation of the law until 2014, so it would appear cheaper under the CBO's standard ten-year budget window and, at least on paper, meet Obama's pledge that the legislation would cost "around $900 billion over 10 years."

When the final CBO score came out before passage, critics noted that the true 10 year cost would be far higher than advertised once projections accounted for full implementation.

Today, the CBO released new projections from 2013 extending through 2022, and the results are as critics expected: the ten-year cost of the law's core provisions to expand health insurance coverage has now ballooned to $1.76 trillion. That's because we now have estimates for Obamacare's first nine years of full implementation, rather than the mere six when it was signed into law. Only next year will we get a true ten-year cost estimate, if the law isn't overturned by the Supreme Court or repealed by then. Given that in 2022, the last year available, the gross cost of the coverage expansions are $265 billion, we're likely looking at about $2 trillion over the first decade, or more than double what Obama advertised.”

Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi reacted to the CBO report with the following statement(satire):

Clearly the president’s health care mandate must be expanded to another 30 million people to bring the cost projections into line. In this regard, Democrats are prepared to offer ObamaCare to 30 million uninsured Mexican citizens in exchange for those folks not migrating to the United States before the 2016 elections.

Leave it to Nancy Pelosi to find a way to waste even more taxpayer money trying to fix the mess she, Harry Reid and Obama dumped on the US citizenry!


Obama Approval Ratings Plummet; Steven Chu Ditches Affection for $8 Gallon Gas!

By John W. Lillpop

In 2008, Dr. Steven Chu made the following statement to the Wall Street Journal:
“Somehow we have to figure out how to boost the price of gasoline to the levels in Europe.”

With that quote an ever-present part of Chu’s dossier, one wonders why Barack Obama even considered the left-wing environmental extremist for Energy Secretary, much less actually nominating the man?

Putting Chu in charge of energy would be like appointing a madman who loathes books in charge of education. Or appointing a tax cheat to be Secretary of the Treasury with authority over the IRS!

Oops, on the latter! That is exactly what Obama did by dredging up the redoubtable Tim Geithner!

Obama’s recent collapse in the Approval Ratings game(he went from 50 to 41 percent in a hurry) has precipitated a rethinking of the $8 a gallon idiocy by Chu.

Now as if by magic, Chu is all for lowering gas prices! As reported at the reference, in part, the Secretary explained it all with these words:

“When I became secretary of Energy, I represented the U.S. government,” Chu added. “Of course we don’t want the price of gasoline to go up, we want it to go down.”
It is nothing short of miraculous what a 9-point drop in approval ratings for the president can do to alter a zany attitude into mainstream thinking!

reference http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0312/73934.html#ixzz1p6rJd5kx


When a ‘Good’ War Goes ‘Bad,’ & There Is No Bush to Hide Behind!

By John W. Lillpop

Pity poor Barack Obama. After declaring the war in Afghanistan “Smart” and the conflict in Iraq “Dumb,” the One is confronted with images of his blessed self being burned in Effigy
for reasons other than ObamaCare, his costly and Unconstitutional foray into Marxist medicine.

Those images from Afghanistan indicate that locals are in sharp disagreement with Obama about the relative IQ of his war in their home land.

As reported in part at the reference:

Earlier Tuesday thousands of people took to the streets in eastern Afghanistan to protest the killings, burning an effigy of Obama and calling for the killer to be tried in Afghanistan.

Demonstrators in the city of Jalalabad chanted "Death to America -- Death to Obama" and blocked the main highway to Afghanistan's capital, Kabul, Britain's Daily Telegraph reported.

"Jihad (holy war) is the only way to get the invading Americans out of Afghanistan," one banner read, according to the newspaper.

The demonstrators also demanded that President Hamid Karzai reject plans to sign a strategic pact with Washington that would allow U.S. advisers and possibly special forces to remain beyond a 2014 deadline for foreign combat troops to leave Afghanistan.”

It would appear as though our befuddled community organizer is out of his element when it comes to being Commander-in-Chief, at least in wars that require more than “Leading from Behind” action.

Worse of all, Afghanistan is HIS war, stupid timeline for withdrawal and all!

How tempting it must be for Obama to reach into his bag of deceit and chicanery in a feeble attempt to blame Bush for the current chaos.

Sorry, Mr. President, but the expiration date on that excuse has come and gone. This is YOUR surge and responsibility, sir!

Reference: http://worldnews.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/13/10663423-obama-killing-afghans-as-serious-as-killing-americans


AG Holder: Obama Political Advantage Among Minorities Trumps Voter Fraud Concerns!

By John W. Lillpop

In a blatantly political move to preserve Obama’s advantage among Hispanic voters in an election year, Attorney General Eric Holder has repeated the travesty committed in South Carolina by allowing race to trump legitimate concerns about vote integrity in the state of Texas.

As reported at the reference in part:

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department's civil rights division on Monday objected to a new photo ID requirement for voters in Texas because many Hispanic voters lack state-issued identification.

Texas follows South Carolina as the second state in recent months to become embroiled in a court battle with the Justice Department over new photo ID requirements for voters.
Photo ID laws have become a point of contention in the 2012 elections. Liberal groups have said the requirements are the product of Republican-controlled state governments and are aimed at disenfranchising people who tend to vote Democratic — African-Americans, Hispanics, people of low-income and college students.

Proponents of such legislation say the measures are aimed at combating voter fraud. But advocacy groups for minorities and the poor dispute that and argue there is no evidence of significant voter fraud.

In regard to Texas, "I cannot conclude that the state has sustained its burden" of showing that the newly enacted law has neither a discriminatory purpose nor effect, Thomas E. Perez, the head of the Justice Department's civil rights division, said in a letter to the Texas secretary of state.
Texas Attorney General Greg Abbot has said the Obama administration is hostile to laws like the one passed last year in Texas.

The National Conference of State Legislatures called the voter ID issue "the hottest topic of legislation in the field of elections in 2011," with legislation introduced in 34 states.

The department had been reviewing the Texas law since last year and discussing the matter with state officials. In January, Texas officials sued U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, seeking a court judgment that the state's recently enacted voter ID law was not discriminatory in purpose or effect.”

With this action, Eric Holder has in effect given a green light to voter fraud throughout the nation. This man must be impeached!


Pink Undies In Bam’s Future?

By John W. Lillpop

Just when it appeared as though Rule of Law, honesty, and integrity were “old school” American oddities headed for the trash bin, a true American hero has emerged to take on the most corrupt president in US history in a head-to-head confrontation that rivals the David Vs. Goliath biblical story for mismatches.

Specifically, “America’s Toughest Sheriff,” Sheriff Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, has completed a six-month investigation into the eligibility of Barack Obama to serve as President of these United States in accordance with the United States Constitution, which according to the White House, is an out-dated, irrelevant work created more than 230 years ago by a gang of outlaw white racists to justify the practice of slavery.

Sheriff Arpaio’s enlightening and inspired report, which was issued on March 1, exposed the truth: Obama’s birth certificate is a forgery.

As reported at reference 1, in part:

Sheriff Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, announced last Thursday that he believes President Obama’s birth certificate, released last year, is a fake.

Mr. Arpaio personally commissioned a ten-page report that allegedly shows that Obama’s long-form birth certificate is a “computer generated forgery,” the Chicago Sun Times reports.
The investigation was conducted by volunteers working for Mr. Arpaio. According to the Maricopa County Sheriff, volunteers were used in an attempt not to spend taxpayer money on the investigation. Most of the people involved were retired police officers and lawyers

Sheriff Joseph Arpaio has made a name for himself as “America’s Toughest Sheriff,” and he is especially well-known for his tough stance on illegal immigration.

Though Mr. Arpaio made it clear that he was not questioning the President’s legal status or alleging fraud, the Arizona Sheriff did say that there is evidence of crime.

Mr. Arpaio said that he was motivated to undertake the investigation after a group of nearly 250 people connected to an Arizona branch of the Tea Party group requested that an investigation be completed last summer. “I’m just doing my job,” said Mr. Arpaio said during a news conference.

The Obama campaign brushed off Mr. Arpaio’s accusations. Campaign spokesperson Ben LaBolt tweeted what he called a “live link” to Arpaio’s news conference, but the link instead lead viewers to a video clip of the conspiracy-theory based television series from the 90s, “The X-Files.”

The reaction shows that the Obama campaign is not taking the accusations seriously, and that they do not predict that Mr. Arpaio’s investigation will reignite the skepticism that raged earlier in Mr. Obama’s political career.

Speculation about Obama’s birthplace began almost immediately after Mr. Obama began his first Presidential campaign more than four years ago. Those who believe that Mr. Obama was not born in the United States—“Birthers,” as the group has come to be known—contend that President Obama was born in Kenya, the country where his father was born. These “Birthers” have argued that, as a result, President Obama’s birth certificate is a fake.”

The sheriff’s complete report is presented in reference 2.

Given the wild, wild world of political bluster and discord that the Obama administration has produced over the past threee years, the report by Sheriff Arpaio is a refreshing break and much- needed reassurance that objectivity, fairness, and truth continue to be important elements of American culture.

Arpaio’s stunning report prompts the edgy question:

Are Pink Undies in Obama’s future? In other words, will Obama be taken into custody in Arizona and forced to wear pink underwear in order to effect an appropriate “attitude adjustment?”

Bravo Sheriff, and please continue your heroic work on behalf of the American people.

Reference 1:

Reference 2:



Slouching Toward Greece, One Sandra Fluke at a Time!

By John W. Lillpop

The most insidious part about the Sandra Fluke fiasco, other than that the fact that President of the United States exploited the situation for cheap political gain, is that Ms. Fluke’s attitude and mindset is a frightening example of a generation addicted to costly entitlements, at a time when the nation is going bankrupt.

Further evidence of this moral and economic decline is apparent when one considers the fact that nearly 50 percent of the U.S. population pays zero in taxes while living on some government program(s) or another.

Additionally, 46 million Americans are on food stamps; millions more on welfare and other government handouts where there is scant accountability or oversight, and where the mere suggestion of responsible “cuts” inevitably arouses charges of racism from Democrats.

Such government programs are doled out with reckless abandon by Democrat politicians who buy votes by giving away your tax dollars to scam artists and free loaders who are available to vote for the highest bidder, regardless of party or ideological persuasion.

Although the party is ALWAYS Democrat and the ideology ALWAYS liberal extremist.

How pervasive is the Democrat lust for entitlement-dependent voters?

Consider the issue of illegal immigration for a moment. Anywhere from 12-40 million miscreants have crossed our borders illegally and are living in America with impunity.

And while American citizens are being forced to settle for less, Democrats refuse to cut programs that coddle illegal aliens with goodies that cost taxpayers more than $110 billion a year!

Our borders are not enforced and existing laws are blatantly ignored for fear of offending the invaders with racist actions.

It is hardly a stretch to say that the Democrat party is dedicated to importing millions of non-English speaking and impoverished people who can be manipulated into always voting Democrat, provided the handouts continue.

The invaders themselves have fallen prey to the illogical progressive thinking of Democrats as made evident when hundreds of thousands of illegals march through the streets of America to “demand” amnesty, education, housing, medical care, and the like, based on their non-existent “right” to occupy America at will and without regard to our laws or the economic, social, and political well being of citizenry.

All of this perverse entitlement mania is being orchestrated and even encouraged by Barack Obama who has done his level to best to limit deportations in a fashion that grants stealth amnesty to invaders.

On top of that, this Marxist president has even appointed a Czar to advocate on behalf on illegal aliens, and has sued sovereign US states for taking responsible actions to combat the devastating impact of illegal migrations.

Obama’s zany thinking seems to parallel that of his illegal alien aunt, Zeituni Onyango who was quoted thusly:

"If I come as an immigrant, you have the obligation to make me a citizen."

With that sort of thinking dominating the mind of Aunt Zeituni’s famous nephew, how much longer can America survive?

Slouching toward Greece: A high-priority for Barack Obama!


Conservative Star Melanie Morgan Back on Air In Liberal-Infested Bay Area!

By John W. Lillpop

There is great news for conservatives who rely on talk-radio for truth and wisdom, and not so good news for liberal moon bats: After a three-year hiatus, conservative icon Melanie Morgan is once again gracing the hostile air waves of San Francisco.

Morgan kicked off the new year with a bang by once again agitating and annoying leftist heathens (folk like Nancy Pelosi) with a daily counter-offensive against bias and outright lies from the left.

Melanie joins host Brian Sussman each morning from 5-to 9 AM (pacific) on radio station KSF0-560 which can be heard all over the world via the magic of streaming at http://www.ksfo560.com.

Right Thinking from The West Coast is a must for serious conservatives as well as for liberals too poor to afford therapy or a lobotomy.

Among Melanie’s many distinctions is receiving recognition as a “Worst Person In the World” from lefty Keith Olbermann when he was polluting the air for MSNBC.

Welcome back, Melanie!


Tea Party Deserves Credit for Preventing Obama from Inflicting Even More Pain

By John W. Lillpop

To hear President Obama spin the latest jobs report, 8.3 percent
unemployment is proof positive that his policies are working
as planned, and are more than sufficient reason to give him four
more years of abusive dictatorial power and elitist priviledge.

However, even with the recent modest gains in employment,
there are still approximately 14 million fellow Americans without
gainful employment and millions more whom are trapped in the
quagmire of underemployment.

Those facts have been lost on this befuddled Marxist menace
who continues to believe that government can fix all
problems large, and small, and should be encouraged to do so
given the fact that God is obviously dead, or has himself been laid

According to Obama, in this the era of American Exceptionalism Gone Missing, expectations should be lowered to more reasonable levels, if for no reason other than to make his sorry self look as good as possible.

Those of us who still believe in the American Dream and the Yankee “Can Do” attitude could not disagree more profoundly!

The simple fact of the matter is that this president has wasted trillions of dollars on foolish “stimulus” programs which have inflated the federal deficit while delaying “real” recovery. Indeed, the Obama “recovery” is the most anemic and painful since World War II, mostly because of Obama’s foolish spending which has actually prolonged the misery for millions of Americans.

Furthermore, Obama’s mindless attacks on free enterprise with threats of more intrusive regulations and higher taxes have been instrumental in keeping the economy in the doldrums.

INCONVENIENT TRUTH: Had it not been for Obama and his wrong-minded policies, the US economy would have recovered long ago and would be finally headed in the right direction.

Significantly, President Obama has been stymied time and again over the past year and one half by those courageous heroes in the Tea Party who have refused to give up on America by turning to Marxist voodoo sure to fail in the long term.

Think about it: If the 2010 elections had gone differently and left the US House in hands of Nancy Pelosi and her gaggle of corrupt moon bats, Obama would surely have succeeded in getting his “Jobs” packages approved, which would have made the modest gains of recent months impossible.

The American people need to understand that any recent improvements in the US economy have been made despite Barack Obama, not because of him.

Americans need to further understand that we the people deserve much better than 8.3 percent unemployment! 14 million unemployed Americans is completely unacceptable and must not stand.

Barack Obama is an anti-growth, anti-jobs, and anti-business ideologue who needs to leave Washington, D.C. as soon as possible—without being allowed to do additional harm to our beloved Democracy!

Panetta, Sibelius, & Chu Expose Insanity of Obama Policies

By John W. Lillpop

Hello, America, are you awake and paying attention?

If not, now would be an excellent time to inform yourself so as to participate intelligently in the most crucial election in our nation’s history, now less than eight months away.

In this, the “Information Age,” a mouse, a broadband connection, a discerning mind, and a healthy disrespect for all politicians are vital requisites for ferreting out the truth, or a reasonable facsimile thereof.

Armed with just those tools, the inquisitive soul would have been shocked to hear Obama cabinet members Panetta, Sibelius, and Chu testify before Congress this week and, in the process, trash the concept of US military sovereignty; expose the fact that contrary to promises, ObamaCare may actually increase the federal deficit, and reveal why the Department of Energy is being run by an leftwing elitist who thinks that $8 a gallon gasoline would be good for America.

To begin this sad journey, consider the remarks of Defense Secretary Leon Panetta as reported, in part, at reference 1:

Panetta Surrenders US Military Sovereignty:

“During the hearing yesterday Panetta and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey brazenly admitted that their authority comes not from the U.S. Constitution, but that the United States is subservient to and takes its marching orders from the United Nations and NATO, international bodies over which the American people have no democratic influence.
Panetta was asked by Senator Jeff Sessions, “We spend our time worrying about the U.N., the Arab League, NATO and too little time, in my opinion, worrying about the elected representatives of the United States. As you go forward, will you consult with the United States Congress?”

The Defense Secretary responded “You know, our goal would be to seek international permission. And we would come to the Congress and inform you and determine how best to approach this, whether or not we would want to get permission from the Congress.”

Despite Sessions’ repeated efforts to get Panetta to acknowledge that the United States Congress is supreme to the likes of NATO and the UN, Panetta exalted the power of international bodies over the US legislative branch.

“I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for the United States military to be deployed in combat,” Sessions said. “I don’t believe it’s close to being correct. They provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that’s required to deploy the United States military is of the Congress and the president and the law and the Constitution.”

Panetta’s assertion that he would seek “international permission” before ‘informing’ Congress about the actions of the US military provoked a firestorm of controversy, prompting the Pentagon to engage in damage control by claiming Panetta’s comments were misinterpreted.”

Sibelius Exposes Lies About Cost of ObamaCare

As reported at reference 2, in part:

Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sibelius. She testified before a Senate committee on the new national health care law this week and, in an exchange with Senator Ron Johnson (R – Wisc.), she admitted she really has no idea if Obamacare will save us money or cost us money. Well, that’s not all she admitted, but it was the first thing. We’ll get to the other ways she stumbled through Senator Johnson’s questions, but this is a good place to start. Here is a transcript of the exchange, from the Free Beacon:

“The bottom line here is, the cost of this healthcare law is so uncertain, don’t you think we ought to put the brakes on it?” Johnson asked. “You know, Nancy Pelosi said, ‘We have to pass this law to figure out what’s in it.’ What I don’t want to see is that we have to implement it to figure out how it’s going to bust a hole in our already horribly broken budget.”

SEBELIUS: The original estimate, yes. I think that’s–

JOHNSON: Right. So, the original estimate for deficit reduction–

SEBELIUS: I’m assuming–

JOHNSON: The original estimate for deficit reduction in the first 10 years was $143 billion, correct?


JOHNSON: So now we, we’ve reduced that $143 billion by $86 billion – by not getting revenue from the CLASS Act – and now $111 billion because we’ve increased the mandatory costs of the exchanges, correct?

SEBELIUS: I’m assuming the numbers are correct. I’m sorry I don’t have them.

JOHNSON: So, when you add those together, that’s $197 billion added to the first 10-year cost estimate of Obamacare, so now we are instead of saving $143 billion, we are adding $54 billion to our deficit, correct?

Chu Reveals Why He Could Care Less About Exploding Gas Prices

As reported in part at reference 3:

The big news yesterday was that Energy Secretary Steven Chu does not own a car. But his wife owns a 2002 BMW 325i, which gets 21 MPG, according to the Daily Caller. Why did Chu not get her to trade in the Beamer for a Chevy Volt?

Also, as a Cabinet secretary, he gets a security detail that drives him around in an SUV, most likely a Cadillac Escalade. We can mince around with words over whether he owns a car or not, but he is not taking public transportation, walking or riding a bicycle to get everywhere.

Craig Bannister of CNS said a senator asked Chu at a budget hearing if he owned a Chevy Volt.

Said Chu: “No, I don’t own a car at the moment.”
Why does he not own a Volt?

If as he says the Volt is such a great car — if as he says our use of oil is a bigger threat to national security than terrorism — why does Chu not own a car?

His answer indicates that he does drive. Why not lead by example?

In fact, why does the president not trade in The Beat Cadillac that he rides in for security reasons for a Chevy Volt? Could it be that this Motor Trend Car of the Year and European Car of the Year be a piece of crap that has no speed, no range and takes 10 hours to refill?

If Volts ain’t good enough for our hired help, why should we bother making Volts.”

After listening to Panetta, Sibelius, and Chu, the big questions facing voters are: Are YOU in favor of ceding US military sovereignty, increasing the federal deficit, and $8 a gallon gasoline?

Or do you still love America?

Ref 1 http://www.infowars.com/pentagon-launches-desperate-damage-control-over-shocking-panetta-testimony/

Reference 2 http://endingspending.com/blog/2012/03/08/secretary-sibelius-no-good-horrible-obamacare-day/

Reference 3: http://blogs.dailymail.com/donsurber/archives/52655


Why Would a Shrewd Jew Believe a “Son of Islam” Who Says, “I Got Your Back?”

By John W. Lillpop

Reverend Franklin Graham hit the nail on the head recently when he characterized Barack Obama as a “Son of Islam” who has persistently done more for Muslims during his term in office.

With his remarks, Graham earned the wrath of Obama, the NAACP and most Democrats who believe Obama when he says he is a Christian.

These are the same dolts who swallow the story that Obama was born in Honolulu and is, therefore, eligible to serve as president. And the same clowns who believe that school busing works, that a higher minimum wage helps the poor when the exact opposite is true, and the same dim wits who believe that the overall cost of health care can be reduced by adding 30 million people to the insured rolls.

As they say, you can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, etc., etc., but that is true only when dealing with intellectually-challenged Democrat voters.

‘Tis far more challenging, however, to sell recycled snake oil to a clever Jew when it comes to believing Obama.

For example, when Obama said to Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “There should not be a shred of doubt by now: when the chips are down, I have Israel’s back,” it took every ounce of discipline at Netanyahu’s disposal to resist quoting South Carolina Representative Joe Wilson who blurted, “You Lie!” during the 2009 State of the Union delivered by The One.

And when you think about it, the point is an excellent one: Why Would a Shrewd Jew Believe a “Son of Islam” Who Says, “I Got Your Back?”

Is Obama’s “Blind Eye” Causing Deaths in Syria?

By John W. Lillpop

To say that Barack Hussein is inconsistent, illogical and unduly political when making vital decisions is an understatement of epic proportions.

For example, nearly one year ago, on March 29, 2011, President Obama addressed the nation and unleashed a blast of his world-class, soaring rhetoric to justify military action in Libya, a nation in conflict, but where said conflict did not involve any national interest, direct or indirect, of these United States.

At the time (see reference) Obama invoked moral consciousness as reason enough to shoot 160 or so Tomahawk Missiles into Libya at a cost of nearly one billion dollars to American taxpayers.

Further, because the President acted without approval of the U.S. Congress, his a action was a violation of the War Powers Act and probably an impeachable offense were it not for Harry Reid and like-minded gangsters “serving” the nation as Democrats in the U.S. Senate.

Obama’s exact words from that date:
“Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different. And as president, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action.”


One year later, one wonders where the Obama concern for “slaughter and mass graves” is with respect to the carnage in Syria, where the UN estimates at least 7,500 innocent Syrians have been murdered by the brutal regime of President Assad?

Of course, that was then, and this is now.

In 2011, there were no U.S. elections on the horizon to fret about, although Team Obama was already in campaign mode, and was looking to advance the notion that Obama was strongly committed to rooting out tyranny in the name of Democracy and individual liberty.

However in 2012, with elections just months away, Obama knows that the nation is weary of spending American blood and treasure
on wars in Muslim nations.

Still, the question deserves to be asked: Is Obama’s “Blind Eye” Causing Deaths in Syria?



Obama’s Naive Energy Solution: Let Them Pump Algae!

By John W. Lillpop

Whether or not to fill one’s automobile with gas used to be a relatively simple decision. If the needle said E or close to E, you filled the damn tank and moved on.

However, with Barack Obama and Steven Chu (Obama’s Anti-energy guru) in charge, “filling it up” requires an advanced degree in economics to assure that one is making the most prudent decision without threatening the kids’ education, retirement plans, health care options, and other major areas of life that need proper fiscal attention and discipline.

This outrageous conundrum is yet another example of big -government Marxism gone amuck, where elitist bureaucrats work 24/7 to get Americans out of their automobiles, ostensibly to end the nation’s reliance on oil.

Especially foreign oil, like that which comes from unstable Middle-Eastern nations where terrorism is the only commodity that exceeds petroleum when it comes to exports.

Just to be safe, the Obama-Chu war on energy has been expanded to include non-Middle East nations which are not officially designated as sponsors of terrorism, but which arouse progressive suspicions none the less.

Like Canada and the Keystone Pipeline which, had it not been for Obama, would have put 20,000 Americans back to work in an economy all but devastated by out-of-control spending, massive deficits, and the incoherent and incompetent meddling of a naïve Marxist who has never balanced a budget in his entire life, and who finds the very notion of limited spending to be racist and Anti-American!

Thus, while middle-class Americans face the looming threat of $5 a gallon gasoline, or worse, the Obama “progressive” energy strategy is: “Let them pump algae!”


Just how in the hell is algae supposed to help the unemployed plumber in Los Angeles who needs to drive 10 miles for a job interview, but cannot afford the gasoline needed to motor him to the first employment nibble he has had in seven months?

Of course, left-wing elitists like Obama and Chu do not concern themselves with mundane issues like the price of gasoline.

Indeed, out-of-touch elitists are so shielded from the realities of life that $5 or $6 a gallon gasoline is important only when it is perceived as being a significant threat to the president’s approval ratings and re-election prospects!

Obama and the Democrats: “Party of the Little Guy”?

Don’t be silly!

Romney-Palin Would Trounce Obama-Biden!

By John W. Lillpop

With Mitt Romney edging ever closer to the Republican nomination, speculation will soon center on the best choice for a candidate to join the ticket as the nominee for Vice-President.

Pundits have already floated the names of Rick Santorun, Ron Paul, Marco Rubio, and countless others for the honor. Criteria include a warrior who can appeal to independents, Tea Party members, and one who can help balance the perception of Romney as too much of a centrist.

When it comes to photgenic appeal and good looks, there is one possible team that tops them all and that would be Governor Romney and Governor Palin!

Palin would bring strong conservative credentials and executive experience from her gig as Governor of Alaska to the ticket as well as striking beauty.

Romney-Palin would be the most attractive political couple on the planet and would be perfect for the conservative "Occupy Washington" movement.

This dog can hunt folks!


In Rush Vs. Fluke Fray, Insanity Prevails-- As Usual!

By John W. Lillpop

Like starving sharks driven to frenzy by the sight and sweet smell of fresh blood in the water, liberal Democrats and left-wing moon bats masquerading as journalists are circling the studios of superstar Rush Limbaugh in anticipation of being able to silence dissent and the inconvenience of opposing views, once and for all.

For his “intemperate” remarks about Sandra Fluke, Rush is being portrayed as a despicable, woman-hating misogynist whose First Amendment rights to free speech should be permanently revoked, with no chance for reinstatement.

According to the left, Rush should be kicked off the air ways as compensation to Fluke, the 30-year-old parasite-Marxist, who believes that American tax payers should bear the financial burden for protecting her from the unintended consequences of her own sexual behavior.

Imagine that. An allegedly educated woman who, at the ripe old age of 30, actually believes that her sexual experiences, whatever they might be, should be unwritten by middle-class Americans who are struggling to make mortgage payments, fund education for their offspring, and plan for retirement, all the while trying to survive the withering economy brought to us by the failed Obama presidency.

Speaking of Obama, the fellow who should be working 24/7 to fix the economy that he ruined, who should be working to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear threat, and who should be tending to a a host of other vital issues, found time to join the Limbaugh-Fluke fray by placing a personal call to the abused 30-year-old in order to reassure the young thang that the government is ready and able to take care of her from cradle to grave, including picking up the tab for her ‘reproduction prevention’ needs.

Never mind that 45 million Americans are on food stamps, that Social Security is going broke, millions face foreclosure and bankruptcy, and that the federal deficit is fast approaching 16 TRILLION dollars.

None of that really matters, Sandra, as long as YOUR needs are being met.

Oh, and do not forget to register (Democrat, of course!) and by all means vote in November!

By the way, does anyone remember if Obama placed a comforting call to conservative radio personality Laura Ingraham when she was called a “slut” by MSNBC’s Ed Schultz?

Just asking.