Stuck on Stupid in San Francisco in the War on Illegal Aliens

By John W. Lillpop


San Francisco has a well-deserved (and appropriate) reputation as a nesting place for left-wing buffoons, anti-American politicos (Can you say Nancy Pelosi?), and just plain goofy, out-of-touch policies.

For example, take the issue of ILLEGAL immigration. Illegal capitalized because that vital word is almost always omitted by moon bats on the left who favor open borders, suspension of the rule of law, and anything and everything in the way of benefits and perks for anyone who can prove that she or he is here illegally and prove it by speaking absolutely no English, but perfect grade-school Spanish.

The latest anti-American immigration fiasco in not-so-good old San Francisco involves the conflict between the Sanctuary City status prescribed by City law and the federal law called Secure Communities.

As described at the reference, in part, San Francisco Sheriff Mike Hennessey has decided that City Law trumps federal law at least in this bastion of leftist maniacs:

SAN FRANCISCO -- If the San Francisco sheriff's plan becomes reality, illegal immigrants arrested for petty crimes won't be held in jail longer than necessary, even if federal immigration agents may want them detained for possible deportation.

Instead, starting Wednesday, deputies will treat those eligible for release just like U.S. citizens: They will be cited to appear in court.
City officials, however, aren't so sure about Sheriff Mike Hennessey's plan.

The new policy is his attempt to comply with a city law that prevents police from aiding federal authorities in non-felony crimes and a U.S. law that requires authorities to share fingerprints with immigration agents.

"I'm in a position where I'm trying to enforce a local law as well as not violate the federal law and this is the `in-between,"' he said. "It's a difficult area to tread on because emotions run very high here in California and throughout the country on immigration issues."

Actually, this is NOT a difficult area to tread on, Sheriff. Not at all, at least if you have the ability to think with reason.

Think back, Sheriff, to 2008 when on June 22 in San Francisco, California, a 21-year old MS gang member, Edwin Ramos, shot and killed a father, Anthony Bologna, 48, and his two sons Michael, 20, and Matthew, 16, after their car briefly blocked Ramos from completing a left turn down a narrow street as they were returning home from a family barbecue.

Ramos was an illegal alien whom San Francisco authorities had released because of idiotic compassion and concern for illegals and zero concern for American citizens.


Do the deaths of Bologna and his sons mean nothing to Sheriff Hennessey and his liberal colleagues in this god-forsaken din of inequity?

And where are Barack Obama and Eric Holder when it comes to local authorities whom defy federal law?

Or is it Obama government policy to ignore such defiance when illegal aliens benefit at the expense of citizens?



http://www.ktvu.com/news/28067653/detail.html

Dishonoring the Meaning of Memorial Day

By John W. Lillpop

As originally conceived, Memorial Day was more than just a day off with pay, barbecued hot dogs, slow-pitch softball and ice-cold beer.

Indeed, the last Monday in each May was set aside to commemorate all U.S. men and women who lost their lives while serving in the military and, whom, while so doing, helped preserve the liberties and freedoms that bring felicity to the American experience.

In order to fully appreciate those who gave their all for the grand American experiment, patriots should take time away from the BBQ grills, beer, and softball diamonds long enough to ponder the impact that President Obama and the Democrat-controlled Congress are likely to have on our democracy, values and way of life.

Specifically, would those American heroes who sacrificed so much be as willing to risk life and limb for a president and Congress that:

Ridicules and shuns the faith and values upon which this great nation was founded?

Speaks critically of America while on foreign soil, even stooping so low as to apologize for our values and elected leaders?

Considers returning veterans "right-wing extremists" along with those who oppose infanticide, gun control measures that violate the 2nd Amendment, out of control spending and taxes,and invasions of American sovereignty and soil by illegal aliens from third-world, failed states?

Bows before foreign kings and declares that America is "not a Christian" nation?

Deliberately neuters homeland security measures, which have kept the nation safe following the most deadly attack in U.S. history?

Jeopardizes Americans in order to bestow "kinder, gentler" treatment on brutal terrorists completely committed to destroying the United States and its allies?

Seeks to enact a "Fairness Doctrine" to choke off free speech, particularly dissenting opinions critical of the Obama administration and Democrat Congress?

Considers "empathy" more important than judicial restraint and strict adherence to the U.S. Constitution in selecting Supreme Court nominees?

Seeks to replace capitalism and free markets with universal health care, rigid government control of private businesses, and other socialist schemes long ago proven fiscally ineffective?

Calls the enforcement of immigration laws "un-American" and accuses the CIA of lying and deliberately misleading the Congress?











God Bless those who gave their lives that We the People might survive while bundled in liberty.

God willing, Americans will honor their memories by taking our nation back, and by demanding sanity, common sense, and morality in those we elect to serve We the People in the future.

Have a Blessed Memorial Day!

The New Meaning of Christmas, As Told by Liberal Revisionists!

Satire by John W. Lillpop

August 4, 1961: A day that will live in infamy along with December 7, 1941 and September 11, 2001?

Or, should America be celebrating the birth of Barack Hussein Obama with the same gusto, reverence, and passion reserved for Christmas?

Do we Americans need a new national holiday--Barackmas--to celebrate this most special birthday?

Under this tax and deficit neutral scheme, everyone would get August 4th off. A small $500 "gratitude fee" would collected by DNC workers to pay for the frolicking.

If all of this sounds far fetched, please consider the following scrolls found in Mohamed Attah's safe deposit box at the Bank of Baghdad as edited by the DNC and White House:


And He Shall Be Called Barack, The Anointed One:

"And it came to pass, in the appointed time, that a child was c born unto a humble servant of Allah in a land called Kenya. And the assembled 72 virgin angels tended to the mother and child, and sang in unison in praise of Allah for blessing the Faithful with this most holy of beings.

"And the virgin angels saith unto his mother, "Take ye this new born, the most favored of Allah, to an island where trade winds blow and birth certificates are fungible.

"He shall be called Barack, which means the Anointed One, and his birthplace shall be recorded as Honolulu to protect Faithful Kenyans from the ravages of evil crusaders, who will be known as "birthers."

"His powers shall be great and he shall be called upon to deliver the Faithful from the ravages of a dyslexic cowboy from Texas who destroyed many Muslims in order to shield Zionist pigs from justice.

"That evil man is the anti-Allah who hides behind a Bush to escape exposure. He must be blamed for all manner of sin and Barack must be held blameless for all woes to visit America, the home of the unfaithful and the land of the fraud."

"The Anointed One shall bring with him a sword with which to slay the moguls of capitalism and free the unwashed masses from insurance companies, Wall Street tycoons, automobile corporations and other agents of tyranny, except for labor unions which shall be rewarded and encouraged to multiple in great numbers, Allah willing.

"His enemies will be many and powerful, but none shall prevail.

"The Anointed One shall reign over America for eight years, or until the US Treasury runs out of money, whichever comes first.

"Go ye, therefore, two by two and preach the Gospel of Barack near and far to all who would hear you. To those who would not abide you, shake the dust from your feet and report the incident to the nearest ACORN center.

"Declare the good news to all, being this: On this night in a lonely mud hut in Kenya, Allah delivered unto us a child to rebuke all that malarkey about a baby Jew birthed by a virgin come to save the world."

And his name shall be BARACK, and he shall be Allah's gift to the Faithful.

Amen and amen!"

Rachel Maddow: Left Wing S**T ?

By John W. Lillpop








In keeping with the ugly tradition of vulgar stupidity made all the more ugly and stupid by Ed Schultz, I hereby nominate Rachel Maddow for “Left wing S**T”

Left-wing snot, that is!




Rachel Maddow: Left Wing S**T ?

Can Obama Be Trusted with Autopen?

By John W. Lillpop


Intellectuals specializing in political science are facing a thorny question unlike any other in the nation’s history. . Namely, has the technology employed by the White House catapulted the position of the U.S. Presidency beyond the pay grade of Barack Obama?

In particular, has the advent of the autopen made known the fact that Obama’s weaknesses render Autopen technology too risky?

The question is anything but frivolous.

Remember, we are dealing with the man who cannot even remember what year it is.

The same fellow who spoke of the 56 states of America during the 2008 campaign.

He is the one who sold ObamaCare to unsuspecting Americans by promising to cover 30 million additional people, while reducing overall costs!

The one and same fellow who refused to release his birth certificate until being outsmarted by Donald Trump into doing so.

The president who promised that his war in Libya would last “days not weeks”-- two and one half months ago.

The one whose “stimulus plan” cost the American economy about 590,000 jobs.


On and on the wreckage from the Obama presidency continues to add up.

The big question: Will the Obama legacy by that of “digital dithering”?

Defending American Sovereignty, Language, and Culture NOT Racist!

By John W. Lillpop

Contrary to the perception of editorial writers at great newspapers like the New York Tiimes, defending American sovereignty is not a expression of racist hatred. In fact, it (defending America) is essential if this republic is to survive.

Acting in the best interests of America means, among other things, preventing further invasions from third world illegal aliens. It also means deporting those already here.

Please save the teary sob stories and lamentations for the poor Mexican migrants who come to America only for a better life. In fact, there are upwards of 38 million of these conniving criminals in America right now.

Most illegal aliens from Mexico fit the following profile, written in the first person for clarity:

"My name is Pedro Ignacio Garcia. My wife and I came to America by crossing the border in Arizona on January 2, 2002. We had to sneak across the border into America because the U.S. immigration system is broken, at least that is what the Mexican government told us.

"Mexican officials told us to have as many children as possible as soon as possible once we got settled in America. We have had six children since; all of whom are American citizens that we are counting on to keep the U.S. government from sending my wife and I back to Mexico. We had planned to come to America in 2003, but we found that my wife was pregnant so we came in 2002 so that the triplets would be born in America.

"We came to America because we heard your president and Democrats in Congress say many nice things about Mexicans who come to America illegally.

"One of the major attractions for us is your excellent system that provides free medical service, especially since I have no health insurance for myself or family. We are very concerned that some hospitals are closing because of the costs of serving poor people like us. We believe that the health insurance premiums for Americans should be increased to cover poor people from Mexico.

"I am very proud of my Mexican heritage and love Spanish, the language of love. I believe that learning English is a waste of time so I do not bother. We have demanded that the public schools teach our children in Spanish. Who needs English?

"We proudly fly the Mexican flag in remembrance of the fact that much of the land that is America was stolen from Mexico. Our children are being taught that retaking that land for Mexico is what God wants us to do.

"I am a potential carrier of deadly strains of tuberculosis and other diseases eradicated in the modern world 75 years ago, but which are still rampant in my beloved Mexico. That is why American citizens need to make sure me and my family receive the very best in medical care.

"I do not pay no stinkin' income taxes to any local, state or federal government. How else could I afford to work for wages that allow me to take jobs from American citizens?

"Our family is on welfare and food stamps even though we are not eligible. We have fake IDs that say we are legal, and we have fake social security numbers to prove it.

"We are saving our pesos to buy a big, beautiful home. But we are worried about the loan credit crisis now threatening to make credit inaccessible to illegal aliens. As with health insurance, we believe the solution is simple: Increase the interest rates paid by American citizens to cover the risk associated with lending to illegal aliens from Mexico.

"We hear that white people want to secure the U.S. borders to keep terrorists out. Phooey! Why would we Mexicans do harm to the land of free tacos, education, health care, food, and housing?


"God bless Mexico and the stupid American gringos who want to hand the United States over to illegal aliens!"

Questions: Why should America allow another 38 million Pedro Garcias into our great nation, and why are people like Pedo and his family not rounded up and deported immediately?

Open Letter to the President and Congress: A Reasonable Plan for Immigation Reform

by John W. Lillpop



Mr. President, Honorable Members of Congress:

Because our government has refused to secure America's borders and enforce the law, our nation is struggling to deal with tens of millions of illegal aliens who have entered this great nation unlawfully.

Many are good-hearted, hard working folks, simply looking for a better life.

However, that description also applies to scores of millions of others throughout the world, just as eager, and just as deserving, for a chance at the American Dream.

But while America is overwhelmed with illegal aliens who have willfully violated our borders and laws, people in other parts of the world are ordered to stand in line, wait their turn, and do that which is required for legal immigration.

We tell such hopefuls that America operates in accordance with the rule of law, and that their immigration wishes must be handled fairly, according to law.

Many of those waiting in line are highly educated and well trained.

Unfortunately, the same can not be said for most illegal aliens currently in America.

Predominately from third-world Latin nations, they are typically non-English speaking, unskilled and poor. Such people impose extraordinary burdens on our all-ready stressed education, health care, and legal systems, and cost American taxpayers more than $110 billion each year.

In addition, while young American men and women are sent to serve in harm's way in Afghanistan and Iraq, our own borders remain unsecured, making America vulnerable to further terrorist attacks.

Failure to secure the home front during time of war can only be seen as a mockery of the American lives and treasury sacrificed to secure freedom in foreign lands 10,000 miles from home.

Americans are well aware of the fact that immigration is the subject of intense debate in the hallowed halls of congress. We also hear that some legislative proposals would actually forgive those who have broken into America in defiance of our borders and laws.

In Washington parlance, the euphemism is "Guest Worker" Program.

Guest worker is understood by everyone to be "amnesty," and is totally unacceptable to a large majority of the American people.

To reward those who are here illegally would only serve to invite another 30 million or so to invade, and would be an unmitigated outrage.

At some point, our government (you) must decide that America is a sovereign nation with borders and laws that really mean something.

Again: Guest worker is amnesty and is totally unacceptable.

A sensible approach to immigration reform should incorporate the ideas offered below:

Employers Must Be Forced to Follow the Law

Businesses that employ illegal aliens represent a major threat to U.S. homeland security and the war on terror. Such businesses must be punished to the full extent of the law, including severe criminal sanctions against management.

Deportations Essential

America can no longer tolerate a policy whereby the immigrant decides unilaterally to invade America---and gets away with it!

The U.S. government must have total control over who enters the nation, where they will reside, for what purpose authorized, and date by which that individual must leave.

No reform scenario should sanction illegals currently here. Intelligent reform should require that every illegal alien be deported.

Use Military Force to Secure Borders

Our borders must be secured by sufficient military troops and or national guardsmen authorized to use force as needed to prevent illegal entry into the U.S.

Temporary Work Permit (TWP)

A worker in a foreign nation wishing to APPLY for a TWP should be allowed to do so, PROVIDED he/she has not been in America unlawfully within the last five years.

Other conditions:

An American employer seeking services from a foreign worker should, in effect, sponsor the worker. That means assuring there is NO burden to the community by way of health care costs,
education, crime, and the like.

Employers may chose to form cooperatives to purchase health insurance at group rates. However, any and all costs of such coverage should be absorbed by employers, not taxpayers.

A TWP should authorize a term of not greater than 18 months, and pertain only to the worker.(A worker's family could cost U.S. taxpayers substantially for health care, educational and
legal services systems, thereby mitigating any benefit realized by employing the worker.)

No worker on a TWP must be allowed to parent an “anchor baby." Existing U.S. laws conferring citizenship on those born to illegal aliens must be changed, retroactively.

Criminal behavior of any sort, even a misdemeanor, should require immediate deportation of the worker.

All of the worker's income should be subject to tax withholding according to procedures administered by employers.

The worker should acknowledge, in writing, his/her understanding and agreement that the TWP has a limited, non-extendable term, and that it confers no other benefits such as driver’s license, social welfare, in-state tuition breaks, or citizenship.

Employers must assure that the worker leaves the U.S. before expiration of the TWP. Any violations should cause the employer to be severely punished.

The labor needs of American business can be satisfied without jeopardizing homeland security or the economic and cultural stability of the American people.

However, we must secure the borders permanently, force employers to obey the law, deport those here illegally, and stop making it so easy and attractive for illegal immigrants to invade America.

Any amnesty or "guest worker" proposal is NOT an acceptable alternative.

Trusting each of You to protect and defend the constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic, I remain Sincerely Yours,



John W. Lillpop
California

Too Old to Remember 1986?

by John W. Lillpop

A fellow blogger has cluttered cyberspace with views contrary to mine on the subject of illegal aliens.

His articles are immediately recognizable because he uses Barbara Streisand as his spell check guru. With predicttabkle reessultgs!

This old man, who shall remain unnamed, has pontificated on and on about what Native American Indians faced when the pilgrims invaded Plymouth Rock in the 1600s. His blathering can be modestly entertaining, unless one has a radio, a telephone, or indoor plumbing.

In the interest of spreading truth and wisdom, I often try to remind this misinformed codger that we are living in 2011, not 1607, and that America is not an unsettled continent.

Furthermore, the United States has absolutely no obligation to honor any psychotic notions that illegal aliens may have concerning their Manifest Destiny or retaking (Reconquesta) of the American Southwest.

The realities of 2011 are quite clear: America is a sovereign nation with defined, established borders. We operate under the rule of law, including procedures that those who wish to migrate here must follow.

Americans welcome newcomers with open arms, provided that those who wish to join us do so in a logical, orderly and lawful manner, AND provided that the aspiring residents will make America better.

Invading across our borders illegally, ignoring our laws, stealing public services, refusing to learn English, and demanding immediate access to the American Dream are not traits one would expect to find in those who would improve America.

This is true whether one is brown, black, yellow, lily-white, red, or an exotic hybrid of lavender and green.

That is the way immigration works in 2011, and it is not open to negotiation just because one can operate a leaf blower or clean toilets.

The United States is hardly alone in this civilized approach to borders and immigration laws. Indeed, I suggest that my “open borders” opponent try to sneak into Mexico illegally, and see how tolerant Mexicans are when it comes to illegal aliens.

In addition, although I can not be certain, my guess is that if this was 1607, Native Americans would not look kindly on 12-38 million illegal aliens invading their land and otherwise plundering their assets.

My blogging buddy also advocates a form of amnesty so that we can secure the borders and move on. In other words, this is last 38 million to get amnesty!

In 1986, the U.S. tried that approach. About three million illegal aliens were granted amnesty and tough new laws were codified to prevent future invasions.

Now, 12-38 million illegal aliens later, we have the same problem, but much larger and, because of the threat of terrorism, far more dangerous.

Amnesty will never work, because it is serves as an incentive to those still in Mexico.

The 1986 experience proves that we need militarized borders and merciless enforcement of our laws, including mass deportations.

But perhaps my cyberspace competitor is too old to remember 1986?

To Mexican President Calderon: Can You Hear Us Now?

May 19, 2010 will surely be remembered as one of the saddest, most tragic days in American history.

For on that dreary spring day, a foreign leader stood before a Joint Session of the U.S. Congress in Washington, D.C., and denounced the sovereign state of Arizona for passing legislation which provides law enforcement officials with the tools needed to protect Arizona and her citizens from illegal invaders from the failed, third-world state of Mexico, and other nations more southerly.

Even more astounding: Mexican President Calderon’s condemnation of American politicians was greeted with cheers and standing ovations from every Democrat member of Congress in attendance on that awful day more than a year ago.

Has there ever been a more despicable, traitorous act perpetrated on American soil by Americans elected to high public office?

Since then, the American people have jettisoned 66 Democrats into involuntary retirement, replacing them with patriots more concerned with the future of America than with using U.S. citizenship to buy party affiliation and political power.

While the final fate of Arizona SB 1070 is yet to be adjudicated, on May 25 the U.S. Supreme Court delivered a serious blow to the aspirations of Democrats and others, foreign and domestic, who would ignore border security and enforcement of immigration law.

In ruling on behalf of Arizona and against the Obama Administration and other anti-rule of law, open borders advocates, the Supreme Court upheld an Arizona law that penalizes businesses for hiring workers in the country illegally.

This victory is seen as a sign that the court is likely to ultimately approve SB-1070 which will inspire states all across America to follow Arizona’s lead.

The court’s ruling also affirms that individual states have legitimate rights when it comes to protecting citizens against foreign invaders.

All of which portends good things to come and a glimmer of hope that the invasion of America can be dealt with in an intelligent, reasonable manner consistent with the interests of America and Americans.

It should also serve as a wake-up call to Mexico and the likes of Felipe Calderon. Namely, Can You Hear Us Now?


By John W. Lillpop

To Mexican President Calderon: Can You Hear Us Now?

SCOTUS Comes Down on Side of Arizona in Illegal Alien Case!

By John W. Lillpop


In a huge victory for the rule of law, good old-fashioned common sense, and American citizens, the Supreme Court sided with Arizona in its effort to prevent and reverse illegal invasions from south of our borders.

As reported at the reference, in part:

“PHOENIX – The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld an Arizona law that penalizes businesses for hiring workers in the country illegally, buoying the hopes of supporters of state crackdowns on illegal immigration.

They predicted the ruling would lead to many other states passing laws that require employers to use the federal E-Verify system to check that workers aren't illegal immigrants. And some said the ruling bodes well for the prospects of a much broader and more controversial immigration law in Arizona, known as SB1070, to be found constitutional.”

This ruling should also inspire other states in the union to pass laws similar to Arizona’s SB-1070 and should motivate California to revive Proposition 187, a measure that would have restricted payment of benefits to illegals. That bill passed by a 2-1 margin in 1994, but was torpedoed by liberal judges and Democrat politicians.

Could this ruling be the turning point in the war against the illegal invasion of America by tens of millions of uneducated, non-English speaking foreign squatters?

Does the ruling provide a glimmer of hope for thwarting the tsunamia of unskilled invaders who cost American taxpayers $113 billion a year?

Perhaps states will now be motivated to do what is in the best interests of American citizens, rather than being bullied by the ACLU and liberal Democrats, none of whom care not one whit about American sovereignty, language, and culture.

If so, then Bravo! It is indeed a new day in America!

SCOTUS Comes Down on Side of Arizona in Illegal Alien Case!

Obama to Call for Return of U.S. –Mexico Borders to 1843?

By John W. Lillpop

Now that he has the middle east and most of the world aflame in bitter debate over changing Israel’s borders to what they were in 1967, how soon will it be before President Obama seeks to redraw the U.S. borders to reflect conditions that existed prior to the U.S. –Mexico war of 1845?

To do so would be consistent with Obama’s passion for whittling away at American dominance and superiority. It would also help bring the Hispanic demographic back to heel in time for the 2012 elections.

Of course, Obama would have to ignore the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, signed on February 2, 1848, which ended the war and gave the U.S. undisputed control of Texas, established the U.S.-Mexican border of the Rio Grande River, and ceded to the United States the present-day states of California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, most of Arizona and Colorado, and parts of Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Wyoming.

In ignoring the Treaty, Obama would find solace with millions of Mexican politicians and citizens who continue to insist that the land covered in the treaty remains a part of Mexico.

Such people use that specious argument to justify the current invasion of America by non-English speaking aliens who come here, illegally, for jobs, welfare, food stamps, free education and health care, and the like, all of which costs taxpayers more than $110 billion every year!.

After more than two years in office, Obama has demonstrated a remarkable ability to blatantly ignore the rule of law and cultural traditions that have made America great.

Thus, ignoring the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo should be a piece of cake for our rule-of- law- adverse chief!

Obama to Call for Return of U.S. –Mexico Borders to 1843?

Liberalism Run Amuck in California: State Ordered to Release 46,000 Immates!

By John W. Lillpop


Progressive policies have, over the years, produced a devastating impact in the areas of education, homeland security, financial solvency, border security, immigration law enforcement, health care, and public safety.

No where has the ruin been more dramatic than in the once great state of California, now been whittled down to a pauper state, akin to that third-world failed state just south of its border.

In particular, the manner by which illegal immigration and the death penalty have been administered at the federal and state levels have left California in a perpetual state of financial emergency and social distress.

Now, California’s “chickens are coming home to roost” in a most disturbing fashion as the U.S. Supreme Court has ordered California to release tens of thousands of its prisoners to relieve overcrowding, saying that "needless suffering and death" had resulted from putting too many inmates into facilities that cannot hold them in decent conditions.

Approximately 30 percent of California’s inmate population--about 46,000 wayward souls-- are illegal aliens, thugs with no business being here in the first place, a situation aggravated considerably by murder, bank robbery, and rape in many cases.

Will those responsible for carrying out the orders from Supreme Court take action to deport illegal alien prisoners to Mexico, Guatemala and other nations of origin?

Or will the ACLU argue that it would be unfair to deport illegals and that said felons should be released in California, without regard to the safety and security of innocent citizens?

Adding to California’s misery is the fact that leftist activist judges have essentially shut down the execution of justice (pun intended!) by holding the death penalty hostage to naive concerns about how much “pain” is involved in lethal injections including the drugs used.

To begin with, the death penalty is supposed to be painful! For goodness sakes, the objective is to kill a person against his or her will--a situation that will almost always involve pain-—which is as it should be.

Besides, how much “pain” can be really involved in a process no more violent than getting a flu shot? In fact, lethal injection produces inadequate pain to atone for the violent, ruthless behavior of many of those convicted of capital crimes..

The solution?

Those inmates sentenced to die at the hands of the law should be given five years maximum to file appeals and for the system to adjudicate said appeals. After that, executions should be carried out as soon as possible.

Let the ruin of California serve as a warning to all Americans: Progressive policies can not be implemented without destroying civilized society.

California Ordered to Release 46,000 Inmates: Time to Deport and Execute!

By John W. Lillpop


Wrong-minded progressive policies have, over the years, produced a devastating impact in the areas of education, homeland security, financial solvency, and public safety.

No where has the ruin been more dramatic than in the once great state of California which has been whittled down to a pauper state, akin to that third-world failed state just south of the Golden State border.

In particular, the manner by which illegal immigration and the death penalty have been administered at the federal and state levels have left California in a perpetual state of financial emergency and social distress.

Now, California’s “chickens are coming home to roost” in a most disturbing fashion as reported at the reference, in part:

“WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court ordered California on Monday to release tens of thousands of its prisoners to relieve overcrowding, saying that "needless suffering and death" had resulted from putting too many inmates into facilities that cannot hold them in decent conditions.

It is one of the largest prison release orders in the nation's history, and it sharply split the high court.

Justices upheld an order from a three-judge panel in California that called for releasing 38,000 to 46,000 prisoners. Since then, the state has transferred about 9,000 state inmates to county jails. As a result, the total prison population is now about 32,000 more than the capacity limit set by the panel.”

Approximately 30 percent of California’s inmate population are illegal invaders, people who have no business being here. Many are violent actors guilty of murders and rapes.

Will those responsible for carrying out the orders from Supreme Court take action to deport illegal aliens to Mexico, Guatemala and other nations of origin?

Or will the ACLU and other anti-American loons argue that it would be unfair to deport illegals and that said felons should remain in California?

With leftist moon bats in the mix, DO NOT BET ON COMMON SENSE OR PRO-AMERICAN BEHAVIOR!

Adding to California’s misery is the fact that leftist activist judges have essentially shut down the execution of justice (pun intended!) by holding the death penalty hostage to idiotic concerns about how much “pain” is involved in lethal injections.

To begin with, the death penalty is supposed to be painful! For goodness sakes, the objective is to kill a person against his or her choice. That will almost always involve pain-—which is as it should be.

Besides, how much “pain” can be involved in an injection that resembles a flu shot? In my view, lethal injection produces inadequate pain to atone for the violent, heathen behavior of convicted murderers.

The solution? In order to implement the court order, all inmates who have been on death row for at least five years and whom have been through at least one appeal hearing should be scheduled for lethal injection within the next 60 days.

Let the ruin of California serve as a warning to all Americans: Progressive policies can not be implemented without destroying civilized society.

Let the deportations and executions begin!

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/sc-dc-0524-court-prisons-web-20110523,0,2337401.story

California Ordered to Release 46,000 Inmates: Time to Deport and Execute!

As to That Proposed Barack-for-Bibi Swap: We Must Sweeten Offer!

Satire by John W. Lillpop


A hat tip to Doug Patton of the Canada Free Press for his outstanding “Can We Trade Barack for Bibi?” offer, see reference 1.

While Mr. Patton is certainly thinking outside the box and in the best interests of America, I fear that the Israelis may not nibble at the bait.

They ARE Jews after all, which means they are seldom cheated or outsmarted when it comes to trade or barter.

To head off an inevitable rejection, I would like to add a few concessions to the pot so as to entice Israel toward making a deal.

My terms:

In addition to Barack, America agrees to the unconditional transfer of Senators Schumer, Boxer, Feinstein, Reid, Kerry, Graham (R-SC), Murray, and Durbin to the Israeli government.

Further, America accepts full responsibility for any and all pensions, salaries, bribes, and corruption fees, including criminal attorney charges, as may be owed by said senators.

In order to facilitate peace in the middle-east, America further agrees to grant that mythical entity known as Palestine the following sovereign U.S. States in a historic “Land for Peace” deal:

California, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, and all other blue states where the number of citizens identifying themselves as “liberal” exceeds ten percent of the total population.

This “Land for Peace” accord indemnifies the American government from any and all disputes between the Palestinians and illegal invaders from south of our borders. All such disputes shall be resolved by the disputing parties using whatever legal, financial, and language resources at their disposal.

This Agreement is NOT subject to any Signing Statement, Executive Order, or other foolish device for circumventing the U.S. Constitution.

Most importantly, this accord shall include a specific “NO Right of Return” provision.


There you have it. The amended offer to the good people of Israel and their tormentors in Palestine for the exchange of land and politicians that should bring long-sought peace to the region.

What say you, Israel. Palestinians? Deal?


Reference: http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/36786

As to That Proposed Barack-for-Bibi Swap: We Must Sweeten Offer!

Obama Disdain for Rule of Law Extends to War Powers Resolution

By John W. Lillpop


President Obama continues to commit high crimes and misdemeanors by ignoring the rule of law while making a mockery of the U.S. Constitution.

The president’s latest impeachable offense involves his unilateral decision and order to fire more than 150 Tomahawk missiles into Libya in his failed attempt to oust Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi.

The initial missile attack was executed on March 18, more than 60 days ago.

Apparently, the President with the Law degree from Harvard overlooked (chose to ignore?) the provisions of the War Powers Resolution summarized below.

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541-1548) is a federal law intended to check the power of the President in committing the United States to an armed conflict without the consent of Congress. The resolution was adopted in the form of a United States Congress joint resolution; this provides that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or in case of "a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."

The War Powers Resolution requires the President to notify Congress within 48 hours of committing armed forces to military action and forbids armed forces from remaining for more than 60 days, with a further 30 day withdrawal period, without an authorization of the use of military force or a declaration of war. The resolution was passed by two-thirds of Congress, overriding a presidential veto.

In ordering the missile attack, Obama was quoted as saying,
"I want the American people to know that the use of force is not our first choice and it's not a choice I make lightly," Obama said. "But we cannot stand idly by when a tyrant tells his people that there will be no mercy.”


The obvious question: What about Iran and Syria, sir?

Back to Obama’s most recent impeachable offense.

As reported at the reference, Obama has decided to treat the War Powers Resolution with the same disdain he has shown for border security, enforcement of immigration laws, health care legislation, and other important issues:

In an effort to satisfy those arguing he needs to seek congressional authorization to continue US military activity in accordance with the War Powers Resolution, President Obama wrote a letter to congressional leaders this afternoon suggesting that the role is now so “limited” he does not need to seek congressional approval.

“Since April 4,” the president wrote, “U.S. participation has consisted of: (1) non-kinetic support to the NATO-led operation, including intelligence, logistical support, and search and rescue assistance; (2) aircraft that have assisted in the suppression and destruction of air defenses in support of the no-fly zone; and (3) since April 23, precision strikes by unmanned aerial vehicles against a limited set of clearly defined targets in support of the NATO-led coalition's efforts.”

A senior administration official told ABC News that the letter is intended to describe “a narrow US effort that is intermittent and principally an effort to support to support the ongoing NATO-led and UN-authorized civilian support mission and no fly zone.”

Obama’s latest transgression makes clear his cynical mindset.

Namely, If the law or resolution conflicts with Obama’s leftist agenda or reelection strategy, he simply ignores the offending law or resolution.


How much longer will congress allow this renegade community organizer to ignore the law and our democratic values?

Reference:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2011/05/white-house-on-war-powers-deadline-limited-us-role-in-libya-means-no-need-to-get-coingressional-autho.html

Obama Disdain for Rule of Law Extends to War Powers Resolution

Reaction to Obama Betrayal of Israel: Mr. President, Your Helicopter Is Ready

By John W. Lillpop


With the nation, his presidency, and the American democracy in shambles, is it not time for Barack Hussein Obama to face reality and spare the nation yet another two years of grief?


From out-of -control spending resulting in trillions of dollars added to the deficit,to Marxist programs repulsive to most Americans, to soaring unemployment, to programs that promote class and racial warfare, to complete abandonment of border security and immigration law enforcement, and to inept and naive mismanagement of foreign affairs, Barack Obama has done enough damage to America.


Unfortunately, this human wrecking ball with a degree from Harvard and a questionable birth certificate from Hawaii has the legal right to stay in office for another two years.

However, common sense compels one to shout, “Enough is enough!”

Barack Obama has lost his good sense. He can no longer be trusted with national security or important functions that require mature judgment. He has zero credibility with the public, Congress and the world.

Barack Obama needs to leave Washington, D.C. as soon as possible. Waikiki Beach is calling and Barack Obama is urgently needed there.
———————————————————————-

Learning from History:


In 1974, America was confronted with a rascal in the White House by the name of Richard M. Nixon. Unfortunately, Nixon was a despicable crook.
But in 1974, the Republican Party was blessed to have a few leaders with cajoles and a passion for America. Those noble Republicans walked into the White House at an appropriate time and let Nixon know that his time had elapsed and that, in the interests of the nation and himself, it was time to go.

To his credit, Richard M. Nixon did the honorable thing by resigning the presidency. On August 9, 1974, President Nixon boarded an Air Force helicopter on the lawn of the White House and made his way home to California.

America was grateful for the fact that our “national nightmare was over” and the healing process began immediately!
Today’s challenge: America needs three or four Democrats with cajoles to deliver a Nixon-like message to Barack Obama.


Namely, “Mr. President, Your Helicopter is Ready!”


By leaving now, Mr. Obama can accomplish the most noble and patriotic act of his presidency. And America can begin healing.


Reaction to Obama Betrayal of Israel: Mr. President, Your Helicopter Is Ready

Israeli Professor Home Schools Naïve Community Organizer

By John W. Lillpop


Over the past 28 months, President Obama has made it a habit of routinely talking down to the American people with such intense arrogance, aloofness, and self-absorption as to be insufferable.

It’s as though this president regards himself as a tenured professor of such immense genius that he feels justified in looking down his nose while lecturing the masses, otherwise known as We the People.

After being talked down to for over two years, this citizen confesses to celebrating, if ever so slightly, the home schooling of President Obama by Benjamin Netanyahu as reported in part at the reference:

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu bluntly told President Barack Obama on Friday his vision of how to achieve Middle East peace was unrealistic, exposing a deep divide that could doom any U.S. bid to revive peace talks.

In an unusually sharp rebuke to Israel's closest ally, Netanyahu insisted Israel would never pull back to its 1967 borders -- which would mean big concessions of occupied land -- that Obama had said should be the basis for negotiations on creating a Palestinian state.

"Peace based on illusions will crash eventually on the rocks of Middle East reality," an unsmiling Netanyahu said as Obama listened intently beside him in the Oval Office after they met for talks.”

Especially fine was the “Peace based on illusions will crash eventually on the rocks of Middle East reality” line fired by Bibi, which demonstrates that the Israeli leader has a clue as to the naivete and immaturity of The One.

Yes, yes, I know. Netanyahu WAS disrespectful, or damn close to it.

And yes, it was painful and embarrassing to watch an American president, even a lousy one, pummeled by a foreign leader while on American soil.

Still, seeing President Obama dressed down with words in a forthright, blunt fashion sent a “thrill up my leg” if only very briefly.

Clearly, Barack Obama needs plenty of lectures from folks like Netanyahu to sort out the president’s priorities.




Israeli Professor Home Schools Naïve Community Organizer

Illegal Aliens Deserve "Respect?" For What?

Illegal Aliens Deserve "Respect?" For What?




By John W. Lillpop

Anti-American politicians comprised of Democrats and RINOs who are in favor of amnesty, have taken to arrogantly demanding "respect" for invading aliens.

According to the new argument, we are blessed to have scores of million of illegal aliens here, and are wrong for treating the "Newly Arrived Refugess" like clones of the late Rodney Dangerfield.

Respect them for what?

Consider the facts. Illegal aliens have:


* Invaded America by ignoring U.S. borders and immigration laws.

* Hampered homeland security and the ability of the federal government to detect and deal with potential terrorists.

* Plundered public services to which they are not entitled.

* Caused educators to "dumb down" class room studies in order to accommodate masses of non-English speakers.

* Forced U.S. hospitals and other medical facilities into bankruptcy, thereby making those facilities unavailable to U.S. citizens.

* Managed to send $30-50 billion a year back to Mexico each year, despite the fact that they cannot or will not pay for medical services received.

* Engaged in wholesale identity theft inflicting great harm to the credit and financial status of millions of innocent Americas.

* Depressed wages and the earning power of American citizens and their families.

* Invaded America for the express purpose of producing "anchor babies" to shield themselves from deportation.

* Refused to learn English.

* Taken over the streets of large U.S. cities in order to demand "rights"
to which they are not entitled.

* Waved the Mexican flag and shouted, "Yes, we can!" and "We are America!" in Spanish as they protest the rule of law.

* Turned May 5 into a day known for rampant public drunkenness and violence, rather than celebration of culture and heritage.

* Voted unlawfully in American elections.

And for this they are owed respect?

With all due respect, the only thing America owes any invading criminal is a solid kick in the ass, a one-way trip back to Mexico, and a permanent ban to keep these scum from ever stepping foot in America again!

Entire State of Nevada Granted ObamaCare Relief: Is This "Waiver-Gate"?

By John W. Lillpop




As if the unseemly process involved in ramming ObamaCare through Congress despite the wishes of the American people was not bad enough, it turns out that the Marxist scheme is so flawed that it was necessary to issue more than 2,000 waivers to avoid even greater disaster.

Remember, this is Obama’s Signature Legislation, which was supposed to add 30 million people to the insured while reducing overall health care costs.

With that outrageous, illogical assumption as its base, it should come as no surprise that ObamaCare is so unwieldy that hundreds of businesses simply cannot implement the Marxist fairy tale.

Thus, the creation of Obama’s waiver-granting bureaucracy to dole out life jackets for businesses that would otherwise be forced to drop employee heath coverage altogether.

Unfortunately, it appears as though the rampant fraud, back room manipulations and corruption which gave birth to ObamaCare are also present in the administration of waivers.

For example, businesses in Nancy Pelosi’s Congressional district have been granted an unusually high number of waivers.

And this from Nevada, in part, (see reference)where the entire state has been granted a partial exemption:

Nevada got a partial waiver from the health care law — a significant development that Democrats are dismissing as par for the course and Republicans are claiming as a political victory.

The Health and Human Services Department announced late Friday that Nevada had secured a statewide waiver from certain implementation requirements of the Obama administration’s health care law, because forcing them through, the department found, “may lead to the destabilization of the individual market.”

The announcement makes Nevada one of only three states to have compliance requirements under the health care bill waived.

For Republicans, the waiver is proof of what they’ve been arguing all along — that Obama’s health care law was never going to work and has to go.

“It is becoming increasingly clear how flawed this law really is,” Nevada Sen. Dean Heller said in a statement Monday. “Not only did it cut a half trillion dollars from Medicare, impacting thousands of Nevada’s seniors, now the law would have driven health insurers out of our state if a reprieve had not been granted.

“This is why ‘ObamaCare’ will not work for Nevada,” Heller said."

Given the already tarnished image of ObamaCare, it is essential that the following questions be asked by independent professionals:
　
•Are waivers granted based on logical rationale, or are political cronyism and favoritism used?

•Are powerful politicians like Pelosi and Harry Reid able to exert undue influence on the waiver-granting process?

•What checks and balances are in place to protect against corruption and fraud?
　
These questions should be investigated by Congress as soon as possible. It may well be that without corruption and fraud, ObamaCare will not even be able to get off the ground!

Entire State of Nevada Granted ObamaCare Waivers! Time for Congressional Probe into "Waiver-Gate"!

Reference:

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/may/16/nevada-secures-partial-waiver-federal-health-care-/
　

The Inexplicable Political Suicide of Newt Gingrich: WTF?

By John W. Lillpop


Talk about a WTF calamity!

Perhaps the only way that Newt Gingrich could have muffed the roll-out of his presidential campaign with greater devastation would be by endorsing President Obama for reelection!

Some will argue that that is actually what the former Speaker of the U.S. accomplished with his cutting remarks which included an apparent endorsement of the mandates set forth in ObamaCare.

Referring to the Paul Ryan’s deficit cutting proposals as “right-wing social engineering” added to Newt’s desperate act of political suicide.

How in the world can a man of Gingrich’s alleged intelligence and vast experience in national Republican politics blunder so grievously?

Surely Newt must be aware of the fact that the Republican Party is in the majority in the U.S. House, with a good chance of winning majority status in the U.S. Senate after the 2012 elections, due in no small part to public outrage over the socialized entitlement called ObamaCare?

Indeed, ObamaCare has unified Republicans, inspired independents to rethink their allegiances, and has painted President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid as the reckless scalawags that they are.

ObamaCare has been ideological mana from heaven for the GOP—and Newt Gingrich aligns himself with Obama, Pelosi, and Reid?

WTF, Newt? Have you lost your bloody mind?


The Inexplicable Political Suicide of Newt Gingrich: WTF?

Strauss-Kahn’s Invaluable Lesson Learned: Look Before You Leap!

Strauss-Kahn’s Invaluable Lesson Learned: Look Before You Leap!


John W. Lillpop


If IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn is guilty of the sex crimes with which he has been charged, this high-profile, jet-setting candidate for the presidency of France may have unwittingly provided other criminally insane brethren with an invaluable heads-up “Lesson Learned.”

The lesson: Know thy victim and look before you leap!


As reported at the reference, in part:

IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn may have more to worry about than a possible prison sentence.

The IMF chief's alleged sex-assault victim lives in a Bronx apartment rented exclusively for adults with HIV or AIDS, The Post has learned.

The hotel maid, a West African immigrant, has occupied the fourth-floor High Bridge pad with her 15-year-old daughter since January -- and before that, lived in another Bronx apartment set aside by Harlem Community AIDS United strictly for adults with the virus and their families.

Strauss-Kahn has clearly not kept up with important changes sweeping across the globe.

Because of AIDS and other STDs, assaulting a poor black woman for sex is now a high-risk venture, unlike the days when a powerful, moneyed white man could whet his appetite for sex at will, with no concern about being held accountable.

The dreaded AIDS virus plays no favorites based on class, wealth, or power. That may be the greatest legacy left by the befuddled frog now spending days and nights in a New York jail cell!



Ref: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/imf_accuser_in_apt_for_hiv_vics_oZmUkbtouJ14RHw1434HvJ

Good News: Obama’s “Stimulus” Cost ONLY 595,000 Jobs!

By John W. Lillpop



When you are President Obama and your Osama kill “bounce” has evaporated into thin air, you look just about anywhere for good uplifting news.

Or to be more precise, less awful!

That is apparently what has happened with the news that the trillion-dollar “stimulus” pushed by Obama not only failed to add jobs but, in fact, forced nearly 600,000 jobs into obscurity.

As reported, in part, at the reference:

New economics research suggests that President Obama's stimulus plan may have destroyed or forestalled employment, including more than 1 million private-sector jobs.

Economists Timothy Conley, University of Western Ontario, and Bill Dupor of Ohio State University found that the stimulus resulted in a net loss of 595,000 jobs from April 2009 to September 2010.

That counters research by the Congressional Budget Office, the Council of Economic Advisors, and many other economists. But Conley and Dupor's research differs in that instead of looking at the stimulus' effects on total employment, it breaks jobs into four different sectors:

Goods-producing industries, including manufacturing.
Health and education, leisure, and business and professional (HELP) services.
Other service industries.

State and local government.

The authors divided employment this way "because of the large differences in trends across the sectors over the past decade."

Their paper shows the stimulus created or saved 443,000 government jobs and 92,000 non-HELP service jobs. But it destroyed or forestalled 772,000 HELP jobs and 362,000 goods-producing positions. That's a net loss of 1.042 million private jobs.

"I don't find that very compelling," said Dean Baker, co-director of the liberal Center for Economic and Policy Research. "Since 2008 the economy went through a wringer and trends in these sectors were broken ... furthermore, their results were only marginally significant."

While acknowledging that Conley and Dupor's result were not very statistically robust, James Sherk argues that the lack of job growth is a significant finding.

"If the other studies which are programmed to show that the stimulus has a positive effect on jobs were right, then you'd expect Conley-Dupor to show 2 to 3 million jobs created," said Sherk, senior policy analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation. "That it was a negative figure ... tells you at best the stimulus was a wash."

A wash? For a trillion dollars, America deserves much more than a wash!

Still, as Nancy Pelosi would say, “This could have been a lot worse. Only due to the president’s determination and intelligence have the losses been minimized. Americans should be celebrating the president’s victory!”

And so it is in the once great nation of America!





Ref: http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/572443/201105171800/Stimulus-Cost-1-Mil-Private-Jobs-.htm

SHUT UP, CARLOS SANTANA!

By John W. Lillpop


Those who genuinely care about our great nation, are justifiably outraged that the Mexican government blatantly refuses to respect American sovereignty and rule of law.


Mexican born musician Carlos Santana in Atlanta to receive an award prior to a Major League Baseball game said that Arizona and the city of Atlanta should be "ashamed" for passing immigration bills!

Santana who enjoys enormous fame and fortune due to America, is the one who should be "ashamed" that tens of millions of " his people" have invaded America!

For perspective, Santana would also do well to consider Mexican law and practices with respect to illegal aliens. He would (or should) be "ashamed" at how his beloved Mexico mistreats and abuses (including murder and rape)illegal aliens.

Santana should also hang his head in shame at the fact that Amnesty International has declared Mexico’s treatment of illegals as a “humanitarian crisis!”

Back here in America, illegal aliens are often defended as goodhearted, hardworking folks who come to America because they share our values.

Former President George W. Bush, by all accounts a good and decent man, refused to enforce immigration laws and secure the borders based on his personal belief that illegals migrate north because of a burning desire for the liberties and freedoms which accrue to those who live in our American Democracy.

However, President Bush never answered the following question: If illegal aliens love America and our values so much, why do they blatantly defy the rule of law, a basic foundation of our blessed Democracy?

In truth, illegals do not invade because they share common values or pine for the freedoms found in a robust Democracy.

Illegals come to take public services—education, health care, welfare, food stamps and the like--to which they are not entitled, and which cost U.S. taxpayers more than $100 billion of each year.

Illegal immigration is really all about the redistribution of wealth from American citizens to poorly-educated, impoverished, third-world, non-English speaking invaders from our south.

Its about millions of illegal foreigners deciding, unilaterally, to move to America for their own enrichment, with no concern for the impact that their invasions will have on American citizens.

As to common values. , most Americans are NOT criminals—all illegal aliens are.

Most Americans speak English—most illegal aliens refuse to learn the American language.

In addition, many illegals justify their snubbing of our borders and immigration laws with the belief that parts of the U.S. still belong to Mexico.

They come not to share in the “American Dream,” but to reclaim property which they naively believe to still be part of Mexico.

As everyone knows, the Mexican government bitterly opposes efforts to stem the flow of illegal aliens from Mexico into America. That government has even threatened to take the United States to the UN because a proposed fence at the at the border.

A fence that would be built by Americans on American soil using American money!

However, when it comes to illegal aliens going into Mexico from countries south of its border, the Mexican government has absolutely zero tolerance. No driver’s licenses, in-state tuition, or any of the other perks that American politicians bestow on Mexicans here illegally.

Fact is, illegal aliens in Mexico are regarded as felons by the government, treated accordingly, and are deported as quickly as possible.

America officials should do the same to the scores millions of aliens here illegally.

To claim that America is somehow “blessed” to have a third-world neighbor that does nothing as millions of its citizens are dumped on the backs of U.S. taxpayers is outrageous and irresponsible.

No other nation on earth would tolerate a “neighbor” like Mexico—and neither should America!

Saavy, Carlos?

Illegal Immigration: Its All About Redistribution of Weath

By John W. Lillpop


Those who genuinely care about our great nation, are justifiably outraged that the Mexican government blatantly refuses to respect American sovereignty and rule of law.

Even more distressing: The fact that the Obama administration, the Democrat Party, as well RINO members of the GOP, share Mexico's utter contempt for American citizens.

Those who advocate enforcement of laws and border security are often smeared as racist jingoists. Former Speaker of the U.S. House Nancy Pelosi even suggested that such people are some how un-American!

Mexican born musician Carlos Santana in Atlanta to receive an award prior to a Major League Baseball game, said that Arizona and the city of Atlanta should be "ashamed" for passing immigration bills!

Santana who enjoys enormous fame and fortune due to America, is the one who should be "ashamed" that tens of millions of " his people" have invaded America!

For perspective, Santana would also do well to consider Mexican law and practices with respect to illegal aliens. He would (or should) be "ashamed" at how his beloved Mexico mistreats and abuses (including murder and rape)illegal aliens.

Santana should also hang his head in shame at the fact that Amnesty International has declared Mexico’s treatment of illegals as a “humanitarian crisis!”

Back here in America, illegal aliens are often defended as goodhearted, hardworking folks who come to America because they share our values.

Former President George W. Bush, by all accounts a good and decent man, refused to enforce immigration laws and secure the borders based on his personal belief that illegals migrate north because of a burning desire for the liberties and freedoms which accrue to those who live in our American Democracy.

However, President Bush never answered the following question: If illegal aliens love America and our values so much, why do they blatantly defy the rule of law, a basic foundation of our blessed Democracy?

In truth, illegals do not invade because they share common values or pine for the freedoms found in a robust Democracy.

Illegals come to take public services—education, health care, welfare, food stamps and the like--to which they are not entitled, and which cost U.S. taxpayers more than $100 billion of each year.

Illegal immigration is really all about the redistribution of wealth from American citizens to poorly-educated, impoverished, third-world, non-English speaking invaders from our south.

Its about millions of illegal foreigners deciding, unilaterally, to move to America for their own enrichment, with no concern for the impact that their invasions will have on American citizens.

As to common values. , most Americans are NOT criminals—all illegal aliens are.

Most Americans speak English—most illegal aliens refuse to learn the American language.

In addition, many illegals justify their snubbing of our borders and immigration laws with the belief that parts of the U.S. still belong to Mexico.

They come not to share in the “American Dream,” but to reclaim property which they naively believe to still be part of Mexico.

As everyone knows, the Mexican government bitterly opposes efforts to stem the flow of illegal aliens from Mexico into America. That government has even threatened to take the United States to the UN because a proposed fence at the at the border.

A fence that would be built by Americans on American soil using American money!

However, when it comes to illegal aliens going into Mexico from countries south of its border, the Mexican government has absolutely zero tolerance. No driver’s licenses, in-state tuition, or any of the other perks that American politicians bestow on Mexicans here illegally.

Fact is, illegal aliens in Mexico are regarded as felons by the government, treated accordingly, and are deported as quickly as possible.

America officials should do the same to the scores millions of aliens here illegally.

To claim that America is somehow “blessed” to have a third-world neighbor that does nothing as millions of its citizens are dumped on the backs of U.S. taxpayers is outrageous and irresponsible.

No other nation on earth would tolerate a “neighbor” like Mexico—and neither should America!

Obama’s Afghanistan War: Good or Dumb?

By John W. Lillpop



As the Barack Obama Great Kill of 2011 turns a fortnight old, pressure is building on America’s Situation Room warrior to end the conflict and bring the troops home.

That cry is particularly strident from the Left, based on Obama’s braggadocio and spiking the football about how the murder of Bin Laden has dealt such a severe blow to Al-Quaeda.

With Al-Quaeda snuffed out, the Leftists argue, America no longer has a vital interest in Afghanistan.

Hmmm.

If that argument has merit, then it would seem safe to conclude that Obama’s 30,000 troop “surge” in 2009 was a wrong-minded ado about one old, frail man living in seclusion in what appears to be Section 8 housing in Pakistan. How many American lives and treasure has Obama spent just because of Osama bin Laden?

Finally, the big question: Was Obama’s “surge” a good move, or, given the facts, one of the “dumbest” war moves in U.S. history?

Listen Up, Democrats: America's Immigration System NOT Broken!

By John W. Lillpop


Open borders advocates, those dim wits who are devoted enemies of America, are intent on transforming this nation into a third world cesspool, akin to the failed state of Mexico. Sadly, these jackals continue to use subterfuge and deceit in order to keep America from securing our borders and enforcing the rule of law.

The latest refrain spewing from the anti-rule of law crowd is, "America's immigration system is broken. We cannot stop illegal aliens without comprehensive immigration reform."

Borderdash!

That is nothing but pure Tequila snake oil, which originates with the likes of Felipe Calderon and Vicente Fox, present and past presidents of third world Mexico, who oppose anything that will prevent them from dumping millions of uneducated peasants onto the backs of American taxpayers.

Tragically for American citizens, Tequila snake oil is palatable to Democrats who can no longer win elections without getting votes from uneducated illegal aliens, and to Republicans who are committed to providing an unending pool of uneducated slave labor for greedy business people.

In fact, America's immigration system is not broken at all!

Existing immigration laws will work perfectly fine, provided such laws are enforced, a fact that is confirmed daily in states like Oklahoma where rigid enforcement is forcing large numbers of illegal aliens to self-deport!

Repeat: Enforcement of existing laws will prevent illegal aliens from coming here in the first place, and will drive criminals already here back to their nation(s) of origin!

Instead of upholding their sworn oath and Constitutional duty to defend America from all enemies, foreign and domestic, many of America's so-called leaders blather on and on about "comprehensive" reform, which is liberal-speak for amnesty.

In truth, comprehensive reform is the Monopoly- game equivalent of "get out of jail" cards for millions of criminal freeloaders and scam artists.

Solving the illegal alien crisis is really quite simple:

1. Secure the borders, with military force, if needed.

2. Cut off all foreign aid to Mexico until that nation takes action to keep Mexican citizens from invading America.

3. Enforce all immigration laws currently on the books, and

4. Round up and deport all illegal aliens.

Put in terms even corrupt politicians should be able to understand, "America's immigration system is not broken--just enforce the damn law!"

Geithner Plays “Double-Dip Recession” Card: Are Liberals Listening?

By John W. Lillpop




Treasury boss Tim Geithner left no doubt as to the devastation that would be visited on the U.S. economy should Congress fail to increase the debt ceiling.

His warning, designed to scare cantankerous Republicans into compliance with Obamanomics, was quoted, in part, at the reference:

Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner said if Congress fails to lift the debt ceiling and the U.S. defaults on its obligations “this abrupt contraction would likely push us into a double dip recession,” painting the most explicitly dire prediction to date of the consequences of inaction.

In a heavily-anticipated response to Sen. Michael Bennet, D-Colo., who asked Geithner to document the economic and fiscal impacts of failing to lift the statutory debt limit, the Treasury secretary detailed a chain reaction that would cripple the economy, costing jobs and income.


A default would inflict catastrophic far-reaching damage on our nation’s economy, significantly reducing growth and increasing unemployment,” said Geithner in the letter to Bennet which was dated May 13. “Even a short-term default could cause irrevocable damage to the economy."

Geithner has imposed an August deadline for Congress to lift the $14.3 trillion debt ceiling, but lawmakers are still negotiating over Republican demands to tie the move to spending cuts. And a portion of the GOP still remains skeptical about the need to act by the deadline at all, arguing that the consequences have been overstated.”

With the stakes so very high, one would expect reasonable, intelligent Democrats(if any!) to join Republicans in cutting spending, thereby paving the way for a bipartisan solution that will preserve the credit worthiness of our nation and avert the Armageddon-like scenario envisioned by Geithner.

Besides the alarm sounded by Geithner, the forecast for America’s fiscal health was recently downgraded from “stable” to “negative” by Standard and Poors; again, based on the urgent need to address out-of-control spending.

The big question of the day: Will Democrats “step up” to the plate and act responsibly to reign in spending? Or will they ignore the risk of a double-dip recession and irrevocable damage to the economy by refusing to face reality?

Which will it be, Democrats?


Reference:

http://nationaljournal.com/economy/geithner-predicts-double-dip-if-congress-fails-to-lift-debt-ceiling-20110514

Read Our Lips: No New Amnesty!

By John W. Lillpop


To Harry Reid, most Democrats, all RINOs, and President Barack Obama:

We the people understand that the U.S. Senate is considering yet another idiotic attempt to grant amnesty to millions of illegal aliens who have invaded the sovereign nation known as the United States.

With all due respect to the Majority Leader and other pro-amnesty colleagues, what Part of NO NEW AMNESTY do you not understand?

For the benefit of slow learners and those in denial, let us reiterate why the majority of Americans everywhere, from all political persuasions, are against amnesty for the criminals who have invaded America:

In short, we the people are:

FED UP with plans to merge the United States into a North American alliance with Canada and Mexico. Such a plan would destroy American sovereignty and is totally unacceptable.

FED UP with the refusal of the federal government to secure our borders at time of war.

FED UP when armed Mexicans illegally cross our borders and assault Americans, yet our government takes no action, and refuses to even protest.

FED UP when Americans defending the U.S. from drug smuggling illegal aliens are sent to federal prison, while invading criminals are to be forgiven via amnesty for violating our borders and laws.

FED UP with the fact that upwards of 38 million illegal aliens are currently in America, and cost taxpayers $113 billion dollars every year.

FED UP with a president who orders young Americans into harm's way thousands of miles from home, but who refuses to secure America.

FED UP with politicians who refuse to enforce immigration laws and who claim it is "impossible" to deport criminals here illegally.

FED UP with illegal aliens who can not and/or will not speak English.

FED UP with taxpayer dollars being wasted to print documents in foreign languages.

FED UP with illegal aliens who dump their medical bills on the backs of U.S. taxpayers, but who send $30-40 billion a year back to Mexico each year.

FED UP with the fact that providing free medical services to illegal aliens drives hospitals out of business, making those facilities unavailable to American citizens for whom the medical centers were intended.

FED UP with our schools being invaded by non-English speaking children who impede the learning process of students who genuinely belong here.

FED UP with the fact that federal, state, and local penal systems are overrun by illegal aliens, again costing taxpayers billions each year.

FED UP with the fact that, on average, illegal aliens kill 12 Americans every day.

FED UP with the fact that the overwhelming majority of felony crimes being investigated in Los Angeles have been committed by illegals from Mexico.

FED UP with politicians who refuse to round up and deport millions of illegal aliens who are destroying American culture and language.

FED UP with politicians who pamper illegal aliens with driver's licenses and free public services, which encourage even more invaders to come to America.

FED UP with the attempted Mexicanization of America. Mexico is a third- world slum, and we are FED UP with those who want America to be like Mexico!

Finally, Mr. President and members of the U.S. Congress, we the people are FED UP with those who consistently work on behalf of illegal aliens and the state of Mexico, and against the interests of the American people!

Please do not underestimate the dissatisfaction and rage swelling in the hearts of patriotic Americans on this vital issue.

We the people DEMAND our great country back!

Read Our Lips: NO NEW AMNESTY!

Understanding the Psychopathic Insanity of Illegal Aliens

Understanding the Insane Thinking of Illegal Aliens












Aunt Zeituni: Insight into Obama’s Insane Thinking on Illegals!




By John W. Lillpop

Patriotic, law-abiding American citizens have been shocked and dismayed by President Obama’s consistent refusal to secure U.S. borders with Mexico and by his complete disregard for the rule of law in dealing with tens of millions of illegal aliens squatting here unlawfully.

Time and again, Obama has favored illegal aliens over American citizens, as was the case with the treasonous federal lawsuit against Arizona for defending its citizenry from foreign invaders.

Obama aggravated this assault with an equally toxic report to the UN which listed Arizona’s SB 1070 as an example of human rights violations.

An American president wages war against a sovereign state of the Republic for that state’s efforts to enforce the rule of law? In order to protect foreign invaders?

What could possibly be going through Obama’s mind in executing such an extreme anti-American Jihad?

A possible insight emerges from a recent interview of Obama’s illegal alien aunt, Zeituni Onyango, with WBZ-TV in Boston:


"If I come as an immigrant, you have the obligation to make me a citizen." Those are the words from 58-year-old Zeituni Onyango of Kenya in a recent exclusive interview with WBZ-TV.”

In other words, according to Obama relative Aunt Zeituni, America’s borders and laws are meaningless.

The needs and wishes of American citizens are irrelevant when compared to the "obligation" to grant citizenship to all who come--even if they are here illegally!

That sort of mangled logic, issued to mask criminality and barbaric selfishness, seems a fair recital of Obama’s own immigration policy.

In addition, Obama’s wrong-minded, UN-American stance on illegals was exposed even further in a pathetic pandering to the Hispanic Congressional Caucus in which Obama essentially justified illegal invasions with these words:


“Obama: "Mexicans" Were Here "Long Before America Was Even An Idea”

Clearly, America deserves much better than what the Obama family brings!

Senate Democrats Want "Moats and Alligators" for American Business, Welcome Wagons for Invading Illegals!

Democrats' Dog and Pony Show Fails to Amuse!










　
By John W. Lillpop
　
As backasswards as it seems, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is orchestrating an effort to punish American businesses for making profits, while rewarding invading criminals for ignoring the U.S.-Mexico border and our immigration laws.

It’s more of the anti-business, pro-illegal alien lunacy championed by Barack Obama and his clueless gaggle of warped leftists, obviously unrepentant even after the great shellacking of November, 2010.

Ever mindful of the fact that there are a hell of a lot more illegal aliens (and potential votes) than there are oil executives, Democrats hauled big-oil executives to the Capitol to answer for the skyrocketing price of gasoline, now approaching $5 a gallon.

Had the senators been at all serious in their inquiry, they would have called call Barack Obama on the carpet for his refusal to facilitate increased supply through drilling.

But, of course, Democrats are not really concerned about prices at the pump, especially after Obama personally covered their back by warning the public to "get used to it," it being Obama’s sinister goal of driving millions of Americans from their cars rather than actually working to achieve energy independence.

Thus, the meeting with five oil executives in the Senate to discuss the "Close Big Oil Tax Loopholes Act," the bill that would eliminate tax subsidies for just the five largest oil companies and direct those savings to pay down the deficit.

Total deficit reduction: $21 billion over 10 years.

While some Democrats were proposing to plunder and pillage the very institutions that create jobs and prosperity and already pay exorbitant taxes, other moon bat Democrats in the Senate were trying to revive the Dream Act, a give-away of American treasure to those here illegally, to whom the American people owe absolutely nothing, and whom should be deported back to their third-world nations of origin.

Billions for illegal aliens for goodness sake!

How in the hell does it make any sense, morally or financially, to reward non-citizen invaders while assaulting American businesses that provide this nation’s energy and jobs for the economy?

As to that $21 billion in deficit reduction over ten years, how about going after that $110 billion a year spent by taxpayers to support and sustain millions of illegal aliens?

In addition, illegal aliens do not pay taxes (in many cases) and do not hire employees.

Come on, Harry Reid! Get off the backs of American citizens and focus instead on deporting illegal aliens who are such a huge drain on public coffers.
　
　

Leading from Behind--Except When It Comes to Victory Laps!

Leading from Behind--Except When It Comes to Victory Laps!


Satire by John W. Lillpop



In order to create a positive spin on President Obama’s dithering, tardiness, and general incompetence in dealing with the crisis in Libya, the Left once again raided the nation’s Fairy Dust Makeover reserve in the basement of the White House.

The objective was to float the notion that because of Obama’s exceptional intelligence and moral character, he prefers to “Lead from behind,” and, because he is soooooo special, deserves to exercise that prerogative with impunity.

According to this rebooting, intellectuals of Obama's genius are far more comfortable in leading conflicts from the back seats of power, away from the glitter and glow so brazenly exploited by less sophisticated, less-spiritually attuned cowboys from, say, the old South.

Especially those from old-school states like Texas, just to mention a state at random.

Thus, emerged the image of Barack Obama, the new-age president-warrior who would be above the fray and frill while Leading from Behind.

There would be no silly, “Let’s roll!” “Bring Them On!” or “Mission Accomplished!” incantations falling from the lips of this erudite Harvard grad.

To hell with simplistic, testosterone-blasted excesses!

Besides being a kinder, gentler way of killing people, Leading from Behind has other distinct advantages:

1. Plausible deniability is maintained for the president, just in case the war does not go well, an almost-inevitable result when Barack Obama is intimately involved, and

2. It leaves one in the best position from which to retreat, a vital mainstay in the military strategy of any truly progressive president!


As events have unfolded in Libya, it appears as though Obama’s LFB strategy has produced predictable results:

The war is in stalemate with no end in site, but Obama is not being held responsible for anything!

Cool, huh, Mr. President?

As so often happens with the precocious and gifted, Obama seems to have lost his focus in applying Leading from Behind Fairy Dust to other affairs of state.

Most notably, one immediately thinks of the Osama bin Laden great kill of May 1.

In the OBL kill, President Obama was anything but a shrinking violet. According to his own words, when it came to executing an unarmed terrorist during an illegal raid of a sovereign, foreign nation, Barack Obama was THE MAN, in every respect.

It was President Obama who planned the daring raid in every minute detail.

It was President Obama who selected the specific NAVY SEALS to carry out the mission.

It was President Obama who decisively gave the KILL order—and who required only sixteen hours of deliberation to overcome his liberal queasiness to do the right thing for America.

It was President Obama who ordered a sea burial for the abused remains of the OBL personage, in accordance with Muslim religious rituals, of course.

In fact, with the exception of actually pulling the trigger of the murder weapon, Obama seems to have done it all!

Still, this president was not satisfied upon fulfilling his role as Executioner-in-Chief.

Indeed, at great personal sacrifice and risk, Barack Obama took the OBL success story on the road to share his heroic and historic kill with the American people and with freedom loving people all across the globe.

From Ground Zero came the eloquent, but modest, declaration from America’s 44th president, paraphrased as follows: “The death of Osama bin Laden is living proof that when Americans put their minds to it, I can accomplish anything!”



And so it is in the quiet, unassuming world of Leading from Behind.