By John W. Lillpop
There is no shortage of perfectly sound reasons for rejecting Jerry Brown in favor of Meg Whitman next Tuesday.
To begin with, Brown is too darn old to walk, much less run, for the important job of managing the great state of California.
Secondly, he is an old-school liberal, vaguely in vogue way back in the 60s, 70s and 80s, but as useless as an Obama endorsement in the modern, high-technological jungle that is the 21st century.
Third, while Mayor of Oakland, California for eight dreary years, Brown managed to make one of the worst cities in America even worse. His failed reforms on education and crime remind one of the Holy Warrior from Kenya, the wonky Messiah who has brought nothing but grief to America.
Fourth, from the unconfirmed gossip mill, back in the 70s, Brown allegedly went on an African safari with Linda Rodnstad. At the time she was a star singer and sex pot, but rumors had it that Governor Moonbeam chose to sleep separately from the ravenous Mexican.
That rumor fueled a host of questions about more than just Brown’s goofy politics.
Fifth and most importantly, California is in a perpetual state of fiscal crisis owing to the tendency of voters to elect far-left, tax and spend Democrats to the state legislature.
Brown is a far-left liberal.
Electing this worn-out old man to the governorship of California would be inviting the sort of fiscal, political, and ideological mayhem that has plagued our great nation since Barack Obama and fellow Marxists were handed control of the federal government.
In order to avoid the mistake of 2008, it is imperative for Californians to recognize the vital truth made evident by the disaster of single-party rule in Washington, D.C.
To wit, “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
Send Jerry Brown into permanent retirement:
Vote for Meg Whitman and responsible governance!
