Dalai Lama Says Sex Overrated: How Does He Know?

Satire By John W. Lillpop

According to the Dalai Lama, conjugal life causes "too much ups and downs. "

He went on to say, "Naturally as a human being ... some kind of desire for sex comes, but then you use human intelligence to make comprehension that those couples always full of trouble. And in some cases there is suicide, murder cases," the Dalai Lama said. +++

May I offer some free advise to the holy spiritual leader?

Listen here, Dalai old boy, you must have been raised in a poor neighborhood where only bad girls lived. As one who has been dabbling in the conjugal life for decades, trust me there are not that many murders to deal with.

Most murders involve jealous husbands or boy friends. Even so, the odds for survival can be improved dramatically by romancing only ugly and fat women, those gals whose husbands could give a tinker's damn about who the old hag is cavorting with.

As for suicides, they crop up only if one forgets to take his Viagara at least four hours before a rendezvous, or when one has purchased a very low and ineffective dosage to save money.

Dalai Lama also said, the "consolation" in celibacy is that although 'we miss something, but at the same time, compare whole life, it's better, more independence, more freedom.'

Sorry, Dalai, but that sounds like the king of rationalizing that I used in high school when a particularly fair maiden rejected my invite to the prom.

"She probably has SDI or awful breath," I would mutter to myself in order to console me. "Besides, "close dancing" can lead to gayness."

Whatever was needed to keep my self-esteem from being shattered that is what I would tell myself.

By the way, just how in the name of all that is good and holy, can a "celibate" Buddhist Master give reliable advise on sex? How do he know whether or not "it" is worth it?

To my way of thinking, that would make about as much sense as asking a completely blind person to opine about whether contact lens or prescription glasses provide the best vision assistance!


+++
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=081128183857.lgjbvt92&show_article=1

Red Flags from Mumbai--Will American Liberals Heed Warnings?

By John W. Lillpop


When Prime Minister Manmohan Singh assumed power in India in 2004, one of the first steps his administration implemented was to weaken the anti-terrorism laws on the books. Singh's concern was that innocent Muslims were being victimized by government discrimination.

Since then, India has been hit by a series of terrorist attacks, culminating with the crisis in Mumbai which cost five Americans their lives.

Clearly, terrorism is still a major global threat, protestations by American liberals notwithstanding. ***

How will the horrors of Mumbai impact President-elect Obama's plans to shut down Guantanamo Bay? How about his plans to retreat from Iraq?

Will America's arsenal against terror become kinder and gentler, where talks without pre-conditions replace military force as the primary defense strategy?

Will Barney Frank succeed in cutting the defense budget by 25 percent?

Will Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid work to "kill the Patriot Act" as he did two years ago?

Will Speaker Nancy Pelosi continue to work against the best interests of America, even if unwittingly?

India's political landscape may be dramatically altered by the tragedy in Mumbai. ***

Will Obama, Pelosi, and Reid duplicate the errors in judgment made by the Singh administration in India, leading to tragedy in America?

***
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/29/world/asia/29india.html?pagewanted=1

Obama on Don't Ask, Don't Tell: Don't CHANGE?

By John W. Lillpop

President-elect Barack Obama has produced yet another dramatic "first" for the history books: He is the first African-American president to weasel on a campaign promise before even being sworn in!

At issue is the long-standing Pentagon ban on open homosexuals in the military. During the presidential campaign, Obama promised to reverse the "explosive" policy if elected.

Another item for the CHANGE WE NEED category, or so it seemed.

Now that Obama has been elected and is in a position to actually implement change, certain of those campaign promises are being reviewed carefully and subjected to CHANGE themselves!

With respect to "Don't Ask, Don't Tell," advisors to the President-elect have indicated that CHANGE, whatever it's final form, will not be advanced for months and perhaps not until 2010, according to the Washington Times story linked below.*

Although repealing the ban is still on the CHANGE agenda, "Mr. Obama first wants to confer with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and his new political appointees at the Pentagon to reach a consensus and then present legislation to Congress."

Consult with the Joint Chiefs of Staff? What the Hades do those military fanatics know about discrimination and civil rights, from a gay perspective?

What if the Joint Chiefs of Staff tell the new commander-in-chief, in no uncertain terms, that trashing "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" is an awful idea?

Then what?

Chalk it up to inexperience and promise to do better in 2012?

*WASHINGTONTIMES

We Need Direct Talks With al-Zawahri, Mr. President-Elect?

By John W. Lillpop


This time, Islamofascists have just gone too far. It was bad enough when Al-Quaeda knocked down the Twin Towers and crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11.

But Osama bin Laden's right hand terrorist, Ayman al Zawahiri, went over the edge with a racially insensitive assault on President-elect Barack Obama in which al-Zawahri called the president-elect a "house Negro," along with secretaries of state Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice. *

House Negro? Good heavens, that level of toxic vitriol has not been used since the last Republican fund raising campaign letter was issued in October.

Before that, one must go all the way back to March, 2008, and Bill Clinton's "fairy tale" assault on Obama's manhood and political viability prior to the South Carolina primary.

Just whom the Hades does this al-Zawahri character think he is?
Still, liberals will see the al-Zawahri affront as a perfect opporunity to reinstate "talking" as a major weapon in the American arsenal against terrorism.

Whereas George W. Bush would sent in the U.S. Marines and a few "nuklear" bombers to give al-Zawahri a much needed attitude adjustment, President-elect Obama will most likely invite the excitable Egyptian to a summit at Camp David where the issues can be discussed calmly and sanely.

With no pre-conditions, of course.

Better still, being the shrewd politician that he is, Obama may elect to send his new Secretary of State, Hillary Rodham Clinton, to Pakistan to meet face-to-face with the brutal terrorist.

Same rules, no pre-conditions,

Hillary would be perfect for the assignment because of her vast experience in bobbing and weaving around enemy sniper fire. Her selfless courage and willingness to pay whatever price necessary to help America could pay huge dividends.

And should an unforeseeable calamity should befall HRC in some God-forsaken cave in remote Pakistan, President-elect Obama would then be free to find another Secretary of State, one without grand designs on the Oval Office!

That would be, how you say, a Win-win, Mr. Obama?


Source*

Television Review: D.L. Hughley Breaks the News

By John W. Lillpop

CNN is not generally regarded as much of a source for comedy or light entertainment. Truth be told, they are not too good at serious news either, mostly because of liberal bias.

However, there is a newly minted show on CNN that is actually worth watching. That would be the new hit comedy, D.L. Hughley Breaks the News, which premiered on October 25.

D.L., a stand-up comedian in real life, was promoted to "anchor" at CNN just for this weekly spoof of the news which satirizes black stereotypes and racism for an hour of hilarity every Saturday night.

Did I mention that D.L. is an African-American?

Well, he is, and a darn funny, talented one at that.

Of course, D.L. is an incorrigible supporter of Barack Obama. He is also the only regular at CNN who does not even try to mask his bias and love for the colored fellow who will run the joint (America) come January 20th.

Which is why D.L. decided to take on an Oklahoma newspaper that failed to report Obama's victory with banner headlines on Page 1 of its November 5 edition.

After informing the newspaper of the monumental election results that installed an African-American in the Oval Office for the first time, D.L. shared other headlines of historic value that might have been overlooked in Oklahoma, including:


*CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964 SIGNED INTO LAW

*JIM CROW LAWS OUTLAWED

*ROBINSON BREAKS BASEBALL RACIAL BARRIER

Hysterically funny, unless you happen to be an editor at that Oklahoma newspaper.

Hughley's charm is his uncanny ability to deliver a brutal jab and get away with it by immediately unleashing a nuclear smile and an innocent laugh. That leaves the intended target completely off balance, and unsure about whether or not to get pissed off.

For example, D.L. might gloat about the Obama presidency with these gentle words, "Hey, red-neck cracker, we in charge now! Get over it!" followed by a flash of his charismatic smile.

What's one to do, but laugh like hell?

D.L. Hughley Breaks the News deserves two honky, red neck thumbs up, bro!

Are Obama's Daughters Too Good for Public Schools?

By John W. Lillpop

That public schools in America are a bloody disgrace is a fact that hardly anyone disputes these days. There is no shortage of anecdotal evidence pointing to high school graduates who cannot read their diplomas or do simple arithmetic.

However, determining the root causes and developing practical solutions thereto are invariably dependent on one's political ideology.

Some will argue that class sizes are too large, teachers are not paid enough, and budget expenditures per student are wholly inadequate to deliver quality education results.

Others argue that public schools are a failure because school curriculum are "Dumbed Down" to accommodate non-English speaking foreigners, too much time is wasted on multiculturalism, bilingualism, and political correctness like gay "rights," and because incompetent teachers are protected from being held accountable by unions more dedicated to collecting dues than educating children.

Almost without exception, liberal politicians are beholden to teacher's unions and are strong supporters of public education.

That support is quite enthusiastic when it comes to educating YOUR children, but not nearly as great when it involves THEIR children.

President-elect Barack Obama is a perfect example. During his campaign, Obama hauled in huge campaign contributions from teachers' unions and is a strong supporter of public schools.

He is also a strong opponent of school vouchers, which can help less wealthy families afford private schools for their children.

Notwithstanding his support for public schools, when it comes to his own daughters, Malia and Sasha Obama, the president elect is a typical liberal elitist.

Malia and Sasha currently attend private schools in Illinois, and when Michelle Obama came to Washington D.C. recently to check out new schools, she toured the private Georgetown Day School.

Again: Are Obama's daughters too good for public schools?

If not, enroll them in public schools and prove that you have genuine confidence in those institutions, Mr. President-elect!

CHANGE, Ala Barack Obama, Comes to Gitmo!

Terrorists to be replaced by Bushies?

Satire by John W. Lillpop

(Washington, D.C., LILLPILL)

During the 2008 campaign, President-elect Obama promised to bring CHANGE to Guantanamo Bay; he has since reiterated that commitment during a recent stint on 60 Minutes.

Until now, the exact details of the Obama Gitmo CHANGE have been highly classified, top secret military information withheld from public purview in the interest of national security.

However, by committing a number of complex felonies, all which are considered capital crimes and punishable by death, this reporter has hacked into the Obama lap top and successfully pinched a file cleverly titled, "Operation Gut Guantanamo."

Although the file was prominently labeled "TOP SECRET CONFIDENTIAL" and was password protected, we gained access by entering CHANGE as the password.

As it turns out, deductive logic is a highly valuable skill set in unlocking the nuances of the liberal mind.

Back to the facts, man.

All of the grotesque details from "Operation Gut Guantanamo" are reported herewith, "exclusive" to whatever rag one happens to be reading.

Contrary to earlier statements, the incoming administration will NOT close Guantanamo Bay.

Rather, the Obama regime will CHANGE residency requirements, which will result in the immediate release of all terrorists and suspected terrorists.

Once all innocent detainees, and those suspected of being innocent, have been flown back to the Middle East and released to Al-Quaeda, their cages, prayer blankets, and sleeping bags will be reassigned to ruthless American war criminals, and suspected war criminals.

Because of the devastating economic mess left by George W. Bush and the GOP, the incoming president has decided not to waste taxpayer money on trials for American officials suspected of war crimes against Islam.

Instead, that money will be used to fly detainees home, first-class, where movies showing American soldiers being decapitated in the name of Allah will be featured.

Surround sound headsets will be sold, but dollars will not be accepted.

Other details emerging about Operation Gut Guantanamo include these dillies:

Once the new president has been sworn in on January 20, the U.S. Marines will immediately handcuff and arrest President George Bush, VP Dick Cheney, and all other Bush administration officials in attendance at the Inauguration, excepting only Dr. Condoleezza Rice who will baby-sit the Obama daughters while Barack and Michelle flaunt their new power and prestige at innumerable Inaugural Balls in Washington.

Bush and Cheney will be carted off to Andrews Air Force base where they will be stuffed into discounted fare seats on a military helicopter and flown off to Guantanamo Bay for the rest of their lives.

While Barack and Michelle are dancing away the hours to celebrate Barack's Balls, the U.S. Marines will round up other war criminals from the vanquished Bush administration.

Perk walks will be administered to a variety of savage criminals, including Donald Rumsfeld, Karl Rove, General David Petreaus, Rush Limbaugh, George Tenet, Tommy Frank, Paul Wolofitz, Scooter Libby, and all other individuals serving in either of the Bush terms, excepting only Colin Powell who will assist Dr. Rice in caring for the Obama brats.

All of the W. war criminals will be transported en masse to Guantanamo Bay after consulting with liberal attorney Ramsey Clark who represented Saddam Hussein and who is credited with taking that classic cell phone photograph of Hussein's public hanging.

Clark, it will be recalled, sued the estate of Saddam Hussein for outstanding legal fees, including reimbursement for replacing the batteries in his cell phone, exhausted by taking all of those hanging photographs.

Once the new Gitmo residents have unpacked and settled in, the Water Boarding Commission will be assembled. Donald Rumsfeld and Karl Rove will be "volunteered" as the first water boarding recipients under the kinder, gentler Obama administration.

This is where George W. Bush actually catches a break: Water boarding will be used by Team Obama only to glean vital intelligence. But since W. has none, he will be exempt!

Now that is CHANGE bruther!

Bailing Out Henry Paulson!

Satire By John W. Lillpop

Should America bail out Henry Paulson? Is that a good or bad idea?

To begin with, it will be necessary to arrest the corrupt criminal, which should have happened two months ago.

Next, the alleged Secretary of Treasury will have to stand before a judge, face the charges, and have bail set.

The charges against this enemy of America should include sedition, extortion, election fraud, grand larceny, and conspiracy to overturn the government.

Bail should be set at $851 billion dollars which will cover the amount of the bail out scheme, plus a dollar for processing.

When convicted, this infidel should be sent to Tikrit, the birth pace and final resting spot of Saddam Hussein.

Paulson's journey should be complicated by having a George W. Bush face mask irreversibly glued to his own face, wearing a T-shirt that screams "Allah Sucks!" while being released in the seediest neighborhood of Tikrit at 3 AM, Saturday morning.

His ashes, or whatever remains of his sorry life, should be added to camel manure and sold as garden mulch in Baghdad.

Then he should be punished in a "cruel and unusual" manner!

Henry Paulson's Many Gifts to Barack Obama

By John W. Lillpop

Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson may have gotten away with the greatest political scam in world history and he is not yet finished.

Consider please:

Back in September and October when Governor Palin was just beginning to breath life into the wilting presidential aspirations of John McCain, Secretary Paulson orchestrated a massive "chicken little" scam that panicked President Bush, most members of the Congress, both John McCain and Barack Obama, and most American voters.

Paulson declared that America's financial house was about to collapse and that unless $700 billion in unmarked bills were left in his hands to do with, as he desired, America would die a most painful death.

To assure sufficient angst, Paulson groveled on his hands and knees before Speaker Pelosi and gave she and other U.S. authorities less than a week to come up with the dough.

Paulson warned that the money was needed NOW to prevent America the great from descending into America the grotesque.

After stuttering and stammering a bit, Bush and the Congress complied with Paulson's demands and threw in an extra $150 billion just to show that they really cared.

Paulson's theatrics and the resulting panic on the part of America's leaders, dealt a mortal wound to the McCain-Palin ticket, and all but assured that Barack Obama would become the 44th president of the United States.

McCain's candidacy became a dicey proposition because of his admitted lack of understanding of economic issues, proven true by his "the economic fundamentals are sound" blurb right before Paulson went ballistic.

Therefore, it can be argued that Henry Paulson, without the use of military force or Nixonian plumbers, implemented the most daring and flamboyant coup in U.S. history.

All it took was a check for $850 billion dollars and cajones the size of mid-summer watermelons and Paulson had his man!

Having installed Barack Obama in the Oval Office, Paulson then set about to make life easier for the new president. Which is why Paulson subsequently announced that the bail out billions were not going to used for "toxic assets" after all, and that he was still working out details on how to unload $700 billion dollars.

The grand finale came when Paulson announced that the Bush administration would not spend $350 billion of that bail money after all, leaving said funds for Barack Obama to do with as he chooses come noon on January 20 of 2009.**

Historians will surely honor the "Paulson Ploy" as the most devious, heinous act of larceny in U.S. history. Only Henry Paulson was brazen enough to steal $850 billion from taxpayers and then declare the money not spent to be "surplus" !

Of course, Barack Obama will see it as CHANGE that we need and a wonderful inaugural gift from a heretofore-closeted ally.

Still there is a glimmer of hope. U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) declared that Congress was not told the truth about the bailout of the nation's financial system and should take back what is left of the $700 billion "blank check'' it gave the Bush administration.***

Bravo, Senator Inhofe!

I say take back that $350 billion, and pay down the deficit to keep the Obama/Pelosi/Reid gang from wasting it on illegal aliens or other such stupidity.


**http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D94GREK80&show_article=1


***http://www.tulsaworld.com/news/article.aspx?articleID=20081116_16_A1_hHecri880405

The Audacity of Impertinent Questions!

How has Auntie adjusted to being back in Kenya?


Satire By John W. Lillpop

Despite indications that the main stream media are committed to granting President-elect Obama a four year moratorium on tough questions, with a four year option to renew, there are some with sufficient audacity to ask impertinent questions right from the get go.

A few of my favorites.

Mr. President:

During the campaign, you requested that a special prosecutor look into charges of voter fraud by ACORN. When can we expect arrests, and will any of your staff or family be implicated?

When will your response to Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's letter be released to the public?

How is Auntie adjusting to her new life in Kenya? When was she deported from America?

Given your strong support for public schools and teacher's unions, which local public school will you daughters attend?

What plans do you have for redistributing YOUR wealth to less fortunate family members? Like your half brother and Auntie in Kenya?

With so many Clintonistas joining your administration, is the word CHANGE no longer in vogue?

With same-sex proponents on a national rampage in response to free and open elections that did not go their way, do you plan to make acceptance of gay marriage a major element in your CHANGE template? Perhaps to be announced during your first State of the Union address?

Is Rohm Emanuel really the best man to be Chief of Staff in the "post-partisan" era?

When do you plan to invade Pakistan? Before or after you surrender in Iraq?

Does the Democrat Party no longer consider campaign finance reform a major priority? Is the fact that you raised $650 million dollars a factor?

As president-elect can't you unilaterally veto plans to invade your space--like for instance, your mother-in-law's plans to live in the White House?

Thank you, Mr. President-elect!

What Exactly Are They Protesting?

By John W. Lillpop

On November 4, California voters passed Proposition 8, thereby adding the following language to the state constitution:

"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

Those 14 hate-filled, Nazi-inspired, homophobic words of discrimination and bigotry have caused a major kerfuffel in California as thousands of marchers have taken to the streets to express their outrage.

In particular, protesters have targeted the Mormon Church for that church's financial and political support for Prop. 8.

Protesters are threatening to create a national firestorm as they congregate, shout, and DEMAND!

Demand what?

The right to vote in free and open elections?

That free and open elections be banned when the results do not suit their minuscule minority and its agenda?

Free speech and other rights set forth in the Bill of Rights?

An end to discrimination against gays in housing, employment, and education?

The right to enter into relationships with same sex partners openly and freely, without being harassed by straight citizens and governments?

A Constitutional ban on any religious expression which holds that homosexual behavior is sinful?

Or are protesters demanding that an unwilling American public be forced to accept the notion that gay marriage is a right, the infringement of which constitutes a civil rights evil on a par with slavery and Jim Crow laws?

Instead of protesting against religious expression, the protesters should actually take their signs and threats of violence to the headquarters of La Raza and NAACP to demand that those tax-exempt organizations convince Latinos and African-Americans that same-sex marriage is indeed a "civil rights" issue.

And why not work to convince the most liberal man ever elected to the U.S. presidency to include acceptance of gay marriage in his CHANGE agenda?

After all, President-elect Obama has been very clear: He is opposed to same-sex marriage!

Confessions of a Proud Conservative American

By John W. Lillpop

(Whisper)

Can we talk privately--off the record as they say in the news business?

You won't repeat what I am about to share with you? Promise?

I have a deep, dark secret that has been festering within me for well over a week now. It is driving me mad--or madder, according to my doctor and the local pharmacist.

You see I am a hard core conservative. Die-in-the-wool, Reaganite. To the right of Atilla the Hun.

Lower taxes, school vouchers, strong defense, and patriotism with a capital P.

Which means that I always vote Republican. Always--even when the GOP ticket is headed by a candidate with whom I disagree on many issues, as was the case in 2008.

So, naturally, I voted for John McCain on November 4th, although he is not, in my opinion, a real conservative.

As the election returns started pouring in on election night, it became clear early on that Barack Obama was going to be the 44th president of the United States.

Which is not the result that I was hoping for.

However, as the evening proceeded, I found myself rejoicing, silently, over the fact that America had elected an African-American to the presidency.

Mind you, I did not, would not, could not, vote for Obama. Not because of his race, but because of his policies which I find wrong headed and dangerous.

Still, it seems to that Obama's victory was much larger than liberal or conservative, Democrat or Republican.

Partisan politics be damned, at least for one night.

This was America at her very best! Land of the free, home of the brave and the greatest nation in the history of the human species.

Those facts were confirmed for all the world to see on November 4th.

Again, I rue Obama's election because of his politics.

Still, I thrill at the sight of African-Americans swelled with pride and walking with a livelier bounce in their steps because of Barack Obama.

I am very proud of America for electing an African-American. I only wish that our first black president were a conservative, like Alan Keyes.

Nonetheless, Barack Obama will be our 44th president and I congratulate him and wish him all the best--until the mid-term elections in 2010, that is!

Hang Tough, W.!

By John W. Lillpop

President Bush is coming under considerable pressure from his successor and the Democrat leadership in the U.S. Congress to pass out duplicate keys to the U.S. Treasury for use by a variety of special interest groups to whom the Democrat party is indebted.

First and foremost, Democrats want to bail out labor unions who, by negotiating outrageous wage and benefits packages, have all destroyed the Big Three auto makers.

Of course, liberals will argue that it is the auto industry, not the unions, that needs financial help.

Fine, then let us get corrupt, greedy labor leaders off the backs of GM, Ford, and Chrysler, and off the backs of the autoworkers who are the real victims of union malfeasance!

Unfortunately, instead of dealing with the real causes, Majority Leader Harry Reid prefers to shell out billions more in new emergency loans.**

What emergency might be next?

Three mayors—Michael Nutter of Philadelphia, Shirley Franklin of Atlanta and Phil Gordon of Phoenix—have requested that funds be sent their way to cover up for mayoral mismanagement in their municipalities.

More: Faced with a $28 billion budget shortfall, Governor Schwarzenegger is also looking to Washington, D.C. for a handout to paper over his failed governance.

Why not just "terminate" the $10 billion that California wastes each and every year on illegal aliens, Arnold? That would at least be a start in the right direction.

Others waiting in line for federal welfare assistance include American Express and General Electric Company.

Where and when will all of this fiscal insanity end?

One can hope that, this time, the bucks will stop at the desk of President George W. Bush, at least until the afternoon of January 20.

As a savvy politician, W. must know that liberals want his finger prints indelibly smeared on each and every bail out dollar surrendered to Detroit and other beggars in waiting.

That way, when things implode even further, Obama, Pelosi, and Reid can point to Crawford, Texas and the erstwhile president as the culprit.

Alternatively, should things go well, count on Democrats to pat themselves on the back for "forcing George W. Bush to act responsibly."

It is, alas, a non-win situation, Mr. President!

Which means that doing what is right is the right thing to do: Just say NO, Mr. President!

Remember, Democrats are on a fool's mission: Let them sink or swim in their own wrong-minded Marxism!

Hang tough, W.!


** Source

Governor Palin: One Classy Lady and Great American!

By John W. Lillpop

Who would blame Governor Sarah Palin if she were an angry white female after being used as a punching bag and scapegoat during the 2008 election?

However, the governor has recovered from the unfair attacks and bruises of the election campaign and, rather than holding a bitter partisan grudge, has shown great class and patriotism by offering to help President-elect Barack Obama in any way she can.

"It would be my honor to assist and support our new president and the new administration," said Palin in a report filed on CNN.com.**

The governor paid tribute to President-elect Barack Obama, saying she wishes him "well as the 44th president of the United States. If he governs with the skill, and the grace, and the greatness of which he is capable, we're going to be just fine."***

Governor Palin also wisely commented on the proposed expansion of the bail out package to auto makers and other companies by saying, "We're hearing now more talk of additional taxpayer bailouts ... for companies, for corporations, perhaps even states now who may be standing in line with their hands out despite, perhaps, some poor management decisions on their part that helped tank our economy," she said.

Americans owe a debt of gratitude to Governor Sarah Palin for putting campaign bitterness behind her and rallying behind Barack Obama, President-elect of these great United States.

Governor Palin really understands democracy and what it means to be an American. She will be heard from, and loudly, in the years ahead!

**
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/12/palin/index.html?iref=mpstoryview


***

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/11/13/palin.rga/index.html


jw

What Attracts Child Pornographers to Barbara Boxer?

By John W. Lillpop

First it was Bernie Ward, "Lion of the Left," who worked for Senator Boxer years ago, but who is now in the third month of a seven year prison term for child pornography.

Now comes word that Jeff Rosato, another high-level aide to Boxer, has been charged in federal court with receiving and distributing child pornography.

Rosato was arrested last Friday, and was fired by Boxer's office when news of his arrest broke.

The full story:

http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-boxeraide14-2008nov14,0,5952406.story?track=rss

Hank Paulson: The Case FOR Cruel and Unusual Punishment

How should America deal with this vermin? Water boarding? Hang him? Stone him to death?


By John W. Lillpop

How shall American jurisprudence deal with Henry Paulson, the hairless kleptomaniac also known as Secretary of the Treasury?

Just a few weeks ago, Paulson scared the wits out of most Americans, including our befuddled president and corrupt Congress, by crying "Fire!" at the top of his lungs just to force attention on Wall Street and it's cash flow problems.

With the nation pre-occupied by the most important election in a generation, this arrogant SOB warned that the only hope for saving America from impending financial ruin was to cough up $700 billion dollars and grant him unilateral, unchecked authority to dispense said taxpayer funds to his buddies on Wall Street.

Immediately!

Paulson insisted that the need was so overwhelmingly urgent that there was no time for learned men and women to consider the facts, discuss possible alternatives, engage in rational debate, and act responsibly.

Like an armed robber confronting an unarmed bank teller, Paulson gave President Bush and Congress a frightening ultimatum: Give me $700 billion NOW or else!


According to Paulson, the money was needed to purchase "toxic assets" from Wall Street firms left holding sub-prime loans gone sour.

Of course, President Bush and Congress acceded to Paulson's daylight robbery demand and, just to make sure that taxpayers were completely ripped off, Congress added $150 billion to the bailout request.

Now Paulson has the audacity to announce that the Treasury is not going to purchase "toxic assets" after all.

All of that hoopla and "the sky is falling" fright talk notwithstanding, Henry has decided against using that $850 billion for the purposes for which is allocated.

Again, the big question: How shall the law deal with Henry Paulson?

The answer: To hell with the 8th Amendment!

In Paulson's case, cruel and unusual punishment is the ONLY thing that makes a lick of sense.



jwl

Rays of Sunshine on an Otherwise Dreary Day

By John Kakistos Lillpop


Without a doubt, November 4 will go down as one of the most bleak election days in American history.

Not only was a Marxist elected president, but also the Democrat party expanded its socialist grip on both chambers of Congress.

Nonetheless, there WERE positive results; albeit too few, and of too little consequence.

The intermittent rays of sunshine include the following:

*Democrats failed to gain the coveted filibuster- proof majority in the U.S. Senate.

*Al Franken will NOT be in the U.S. Senate!

*Voters said NO! to gay marriage in California and Florida.

*San Francisco's idiotic measure to name a sewage treatment plant after George W. Bush was trounced, as was the equally stupid proposal to legalize prostitution.

*56 million Americans voted for John McCain.

*Texas remains a Red state.

*Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, anti-illegal alien hero, won his fifth general election.

*Leftist goon Tim Robbins was forced to appear before a judge in order to vote.

*Joe Biden will no longer haunt the U.S. Senate.

*Black Panthers were exposed as racist vote intimidators in Philadelphia, and

*For all practical purposes, Hillary Clinton's fantasy of being president has been permanently put to rest.

Best of all, real conservatives are now free to rebuild the Republican party sans George W. Bush and John McCain!





jkl

Gay Marriage NOT Happening, Whether Liberals Like It or Not!

By John Kakistos Lillpop

California's Constitution has been amended with the following language "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California," as a result of the passage of Proposition 8.

Thus, the right of same-sex couples to marry has been terminated, said right having been established as a result of a state supreme court ruling on May 22.

Throughout the year, Prop. 8 lagged in the polls, but won the only poll that counts: The actual election.

What caused the dramatic change in sentiment?

Ironically enough, politicians and educators in San Francisco, who ardently support same-sex marriage, sabotaged their own cause with reckless decisions and irresponsible behavior.

To begin with, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom arrogantly celebrated the May 22 court decision that legalized gay marriage by bombastically declaring, "This door's wide open now." "It's going to happen, whether you like it or not."

Much to the chagrin of the leftist mayor, that unwise stint of in your face gloating was caught on video and was featured prominently in an ad by those who support Prop. 8.

In other words, Mayor Newsom unwittingly became THE star performer for those who wish to ban gay marriage!

Clue less San Francisco educators added fuel to the fire started by Newsom with an equally bizarre move.

As reported in the San Francisco Chronicle in a story titled, Class surprises lesbian teacher on wedding day, "A group of San Francisco first-graders took an unusual field trip to City Hall on Friday to toss rose petals on their just-married lesbian teacher - putting the public school children at the center of a fierce election battle over the fate of same-sex marriage."


SFGATE:

With folks like Mayor Gavin Newsom and San Francisco teachers around, all that proponents of Prop. 8 had to do was simply wait for the next wave of incomprehensible stupidity to surface, and then make sure that the voting public was informed of that stupidity.

Bottom line: Gay marriage is NOT going to happen, whether liberals like it or not!