By John W. Lillpop
As the GOP struggles to find a viable (or at least reasonable) candidate to oppose Barack Obama, the odd twists and turns in the fortunes of the surviving combatants are often attributed to those anonymous rascals known only as the Republican “establishment.”
No one seems to know who or what the hell the term means.
Is it, for example, El Rushbo? Seems most unlikely since he himself occasionally chides the establishment for being the most potent weapon in Obama’s re-election arsenal.
Very well, then, maybe “it” is the Bush Family, consisting of two former presidents and a third who fancies his likeness on Mt. Rushmore?
Are the Bush boys willfully sponsoring discontent and mayhem among Republicans so as to leave open a spot for Jeb when the moment is just right later in 2012?
Just who the holy hell is the omnipotent establishment that is in control of everything, especially since it seems as though no one is controlling anything?
Matt Drudge? Michael Savage? Charles Krauthammer or Brit Hume?
Who has the power and respect (and money) to dictate whom will be the alternative to our Marxist president?
Could it be that voters ARE in fact the Establishment by virtue of participation in elections and polls?
That last notion seems utterly implausible, given the fact that Republican voters are mindless Sheeple who will vote for anyone with an R next to his or her name, regardless of ideology or qualifications.
Just who is the mysterious Republican "establishment"?
Just asking.
28.1.12
Great News! Court Disqualifies Candidate Because of Poor English Skills
By John W. Lillpop
In a very encouraging bit of news from Arizona, a woman was disqualified from running for office based on her poor English skills.
As reported, in part, at the reference:
Hooray for this common-sense judge! Perhaps Cabrera should move to Mexico and run for office in that failed , 3rd-world state?
This sort of ruling is desperately needed throughout America for occupations which attract foreigners who deal with the public and MUST be fluent in English.
After all this is America, despite the best efforts of Barack Obama and the democrat party.
A new standard should be applied:
Press 1 for English, or
Press 2 to begin deportation process!
In a very encouraging bit of news from Arizona, a woman was disqualified from running for office based on her poor English skills.
As reported, in part, at the reference:
PHOENIX (Reuters) - A woman barred from seeking elected office in an Arizona border town by a judge who ruled she did not have a sufficient grasp of English has decided to fight the controversial ruling, and filed an appeal on Friday, her lawyer said.
A Yuma County judge disqualified Alejandrina Cabrera, a U.S. citizen born in Yuma, from running for a seat on the city council in the town of San Luis this week for what he called a "large gap" between her English proficiency and that required to serve on the council.
"It was clear to the court that she was stymied by many questions, did not understand many questions, failed to comprehend what was being asked, and guessed at answers," the court ruling said.
The judge, in a move that sparked a debate over language in often bilingual U.S.-Mexican border communities, said Cabrera's English was not of the level needed to carry out the professional duties required of a representative of the public.
Hooray for this common-sense judge! Perhaps Cabrera should move to Mexico and run for office in that failed , 3rd-world state?
This sort of ruling is desperately needed throughout America for occupations which attract foreigners who deal with the public and MUST be fluent in English.
After all this is America, despite the best efforts of Barack Obama and the democrat party.
A new standard should be applied:
Press 1 for English, or
Press 2 to begin deportation process!
26.1.12
Nancy Pelosi Threatens Newt Gingrich: Another Goofy Meltdown?
By John W. Lillpop
Over the years, while a member of the U.S. House, Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) has acquired quite a legacy for saying and doing some truly foolish things
Among her most memorable faux pas moments are the following:
Catholic fathers have not concluded whether or not abortion is wrong.
Enforcement of America’s borders & immigration laws is “un-American.”
Those who oppose building a mosque at ground zero in New York should be investigated by Congress.
It was imperative to pass ObamaCare in a heated rush so that Congress could then determine what was exactly in the bill.
Sealing off the Mexican border to prevent illegal drugs from coming into America is far too expensive and ineffective. Better to spend taxpayer money on treatment programs for those Americans actually harmed by such illegal drugs.
Despite information to the contrary in all the polls, Democrats would retain majority control over the U.S. House as a result of the 2010 elections, and she would return as Speaker.
Pelosi’s latest mind warp caused her to stick her unwelcome, unneeded, and uninformed nose in the Republican nominating process by, in effect, issuing a threat against Newt Gingrich.
As reported at the reference, the Pelosi bombshell included the following exchange with John King of CNN:
Bring it on! I would prefer to have her threats than her endorsement!
And so it is in the battle for preeminence among former Speakers of the U.S. House!
http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/24/pelosi-says-that-gingrich-will-not-be-president-in-2012/
Over the years, while a member of the U.S. House, Nancy Pelosi (D-San Francisco) has acquired quite a legacy for saying and doing some truly foolish things
Among her most memorable faux pas moments are the following:
Catholic fathers have not concluded whether or not abortion is wrong.
Enforcement of America’s borders & immigration laws is “un-American.”
Those who oppose building a mosque at ground zero in New York should be investigated by Congress.
It was imperative to pass ObamaCare in a heated rush so that Congress could then determine what was exactly in the bill.
Sealing off the Mexican border to prevent illegal drugs from coming into America is far too expensive and ineffective. Better to spend taxpayer money on treatment programs for those Americans actually harmed by such illegal drugs.
Despite information to the contrary in all the polls, Democrats would retain majority control over the U.S. House as a result of the 2010 elections, and she would return as Speaker.
Pelosi’s latest mind warp caused her to stick her unwelcome, unneeded, and uninformed nose in the Republican nominating process by, in effect, issuing a threat against Newt Gingrich.
As reported at the reference, the Pelosi bombshell included the following exchange with John King of CNN:
John King, CNN: "You make your case there passionately for President Obama. But also understand that this is a tough reelection climate for any president, Democrat or Republican in this economy. Because of your history with Speaker Gingrich, what goes through your mind when you think of the possibility, which is more real today than it was a week or a month ago, that he would be the Republican nominee and that you could come back here next January or next February with a President Gingrich?"When asked about Pelosi’s threat, Gingrich had the perfect rejoinder:
Rep. Nancy Pelosi: "Let me just say this. That will never happen."
King: "Why?"
Pelosi: "He's not going to be President of the United States. That's not going to happen. Let me just make my prediction and stand by it, it isn't going to happen."
King: "Why are you so sure?"
Pelosi: "There is something I know. The Republicans, if they choose to nominate him that's their prerogative. I don't even think that's going to happen."
Bring it on! I would prefer to have her threats than her endorsement!
And so it is in the battle for preeminence among former Speakers of the U.S. House!
http://cnnpressroom.blogs.cnn.com/2012/01/24/pelosi-says-that-gingrich-will-not-be-president-in-2012/
25.1.12
America Is Back, Mr. President? What About “Fast and Furious?”
By John W. Lillpop
How in the world President Obama mustered up the chutzpah to stand before a Joint Session of Congress and 300 million Americans via television and declare, “America is back!” during his State of the Union campaign speech is a matter best left to those who specialize in abnormal psychology.
For the rest of us, only Obama’s blind eye to truth and reality were more grotesque than his unseemly attempt to skate away into narcissistic heaven using former President George W. Bush as his means for propelling his sorry self.
Unemployment at 8.5%, housing market in complete ruins, millions of middle-class Americans facing foreclosure and or bankruptcy, federal debt level in excess of $15 trillion and rising, uncontrolled spending, credit rating downgraded with more degradation likely, and 70-80 percent of Americans in a snit over the fact that America is headed in the “wrong direction.”
And THAT translates into America being “back,” sir?
Of course the president is going to emphasize whatever morsel of good news he can conjure up especially in an election year.
But, really now, “America is back?”
Does anyone other than Michelle's 35 servants believe that?
By the way, Mr. President, how about the “Fast and Furious” scandal which has engulfed your administration, particularly Attorney General Eric Holder, in disgrace, crime, cover-up, and corruption?
There was a time in our history when shipping weapons to terrorists in a foreign nation against the will of Congress and the law was considered an impeachable offense.
Or have you and your Democrat partners-in-crime not heard of the Iran-Contra snafu during Ronald Reagan’s second term?
Unlike your “Fast and Furious” attempt to circumvent the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution, Iran-Contra did NOT lead to the death of any border patrol agent or other American.
America is back, sir?
How in the world President Obama mustered up the chutzpah to stand before a Joint Session of Congress and 300 million Americans via television and declare, “America is back!” during his State of the Union campaign speech is a matter best left to those who specialize in abnormal psychology.
For the rest of us, only Obama’s blind eye to truth and reality were more grotesque than his unseemly attempt to skate away into narcissistic heaven using former President George W. Bush as his means for propelling his sorry self.
Unemployment at 8.5%, housing market in complete ruins, millions of middle-class Americans facing foreclosure and or bankruptcy, federal debt level in excess of $15 trillion and rising, uncontrolled spending, credit rating downgraded with more degradation likely, and 70-80 percent of Americans in a snit over the fact that America is headed in the “wrong direction.”
And THAT translates into America being “back,” sir?
Of course the president is going to emphasize whatever morsel of good news he can conjure up especially in an election year.
But, really now, “America is back?”
Does anyone other than Michelle's 35 servants believe that?
By the way, Mr. President, how about the “Fast and Furious” scandal which has engulfed your administration, particularly Attorney General Eric Holder, in disgrace, crime, cover-up, and corruption?
There was a time in our history when shipping weapons to terrorists in a foreign nation against the will of Congress and the law was considered an impeachable offense.
Or have you and your Democrat partners-in-crime not heard of the Iran-Contra snafu during Ronald Reagan’s second term?
Unlike your “Fast and Furious” attempt to circumvent the 2nd Amendment to the Constitution, Iran-Contra did NOT lead to the death of any border patrol agent or other American.
America is back, sir?
24.1.12
State of the Union: Occupied and In Decline!
By John W. Lillpop
Were President Obama to break with tradition and give an honest report about the real State of the Union, he would be compelled to admit that America is occupied by forces hostile to the U.S. Constitution—himself and the Marxists in the U.S. House and Senate. Those forces are opposed to free-market capitalism and the rule of law held in such high esteem by the majority of Americans.
He would also be obligated to acknowledge that America is in a serious state of decline, from outlandish deficit spending, decimation of education, health care, housing, and automobile interests by the socialist policies of his administration, reckless abandonment of the commitment to keep America safe through a strong military, forfeiture of American borders, language and culture in favor of illegal aliens seen as prospective democrat voters, and general acceptance of lower moral values.
In a word, under Obama the nation “sucks”!
Almost single-handedly, this president has made a mockery of American Exceptionalism, preeminence, and superiority.
Tragically, that is precisely what he planned to do!
Obama’s awful legacy threatens to end America as we know.
Only by uttering the following four words can Obama move to save America and salvage his name for history.
Those words: Effective immediately, I resign!
Go for it, Mr. President.
Were President Obama to break with tradition and give an honest report about the real State of the Union, he would be compelled to admit that America is occupied by forces hostile to the U.S. Constitution—himself and the Marxists in the U.S. House and Senate. Those forces are opposed to free-market capitalism and the rule of law held in such high esteem by the majority of Americans.
He would also be obligated to acknowledge that America is in a serious state of decline, from outlandish deficit spending, decimation of education, health care, housing, and automobile interests by the socialist policies of his administration, reckless abandonment of the commitment to keep America safe through a strong military, forfeiture of American borders, language and culture in favor of illegal aliens seen as prospective democrat voters, and general acceptance of lower moral values.
In a word, under Obama the nation “sucks”!
Almost single-handedly, this president has made a mockery of American Exceptionalism, preeminence, and superiority.
Tragically, that is precisely what he planned to do!
Obama’s awful legacy threatens to end America as we know.
Only by uttering the following four words can Obama move to save America and salvage his name for history.
Those words: Effective immediately, I resign!
Go for it, Mr. President.
23.1.12
Creeping Trepidation
By John W. Lillpop
Not that long ago, routing Barack Obama from office seemed like a lead-pipe cinch. His approval/disapproval numbers were upside down with approvals headed even further south, his gaffes were of the sort one would expect from an inexperienced, unprincipled dolt, and his ill-begotten policies managed to offend nearly everyone, including those constituents generally regarded as democrat-friendly.
Everything The One touched from foreign affairs to mismanagement of the economy, to the degradation of American values and culture, went bad, very bad, from the very moment his fumbling hands got involved.
For conservatives, 2012 was going to be a banner year. On the heels of the humiliating “shellacking” administered to liberals in the U.S. House and, to a lesser extend, the Senate, the Republicans seemed to be in control, with the very real possibility that the executive and legislative branches of government would be returned to we the people through GOP wins in November.
However, events over the past several months have resurrected, at least partially, the Obama magic from 2008.
Mind you, its not that Obama is suddenly performing effectively or anything nearly so radical. In fact, Obama’s recent rejection of the Keystone pipeline project is one of his most inexplicable failings to date.
What with unemployment still rampant, oil soaring above $100 a barrel, and the possibility of all out war in the Middle East rising with each new centrifuge fired up by the Islamic Republic of Iran, now would seem an awful time to reject a proposal for importing oil from a friendly neighbor (Canada) which would add perhaps 20,000 new jobs for Americans, reduce dependence on middle east oil, and provide a common sense approach to meeting America’s energy needs.
Yet reject that offer is exactly what this president did, in spite of his ringing oratory about jobs, jobs, and jobs. NOW, NOW, NOW!
Apparently, jobs are cool, except when environmental extremism needs to be served.
Thus it was YES to the environmental whackos, and NO to American jobs!
More ammunition to use against this fumbling, bumbling loser, right?
Yes, of course. However, the problem is that candidates for the Republican nomination have spent the past year fighting among themselves and acting like the Special Olympics children that Obama loves to mock and ridicule.
Indeed, the GOP debates have been a disappointing display of amateurism, cynicism, and mockery of those moral principles for which the GOP is known.
Herman Cain, Ron Paul, Rick Perry, Mitt Romney, Newt Gingrich and others have blemished the GOP brand.
The big question: Can the remaining candidates, or an as of now undeclared candidate, restore the image of the Republican Party as the conservative, patriotic, family values choice?
Or is American doomed to another four years of Barack Obama by virtue of default by the GOP?
Creeping trepidation becomes more intense with each passing day!
21.1.12
Obama’s Phony Elitst Lament: “I Should Pay More Taxes”
Obama’s Phony Elitst Lament: “I Should Pay More Taxes”
By John W. Lillpop
Once again, Barack Obama has made headlines by saying and doing really foolish things just to pander to his base.
His latest quotable quote was issued to fan the fires of class warfare by calling attention to the issue of “income disparity” which Obama plans to use as a major reelection theme.
Such is life when an incumbent president is forced by fact to divert attention from his performance record, replete as it is with repeated failures and decimation of the American Dream, the U.S. Constitution, and what little civility existed in American politics before this ego-maniac seized power.
Joining a legion of phony-bologna lefties who know damn well that their offers to pay higher taxes will never be heeded, Obama said the following:
“I've been hearing a lot of these Republicans talking about, oh, that's class warfare, and he just wants to redistribute, and doesn't believe in work, and he's trying to create an entitlement society, and this and that and the other. Let me be absolutely clear: I should pay more taxes, and folks in my income bracket should pay more taxes, and certainly folks who are making billions of dollars should pay more taxes, not because I want to take their money and just give it to somebody else. It's because we've got basic investments and basic functions that have to be carried out in this 21st century if we're going to be able to compete.”
With all due respect to the president and liberals like George Soros whom are obsessed with crushing guilt over the ‘unfair’ success they enjoy, the following question must be posed:
Who the hell is stopping you from paying more? Why not put your money where you mouth is and send a bundle(s) of cash to the IRS just for the sake doing so?
Who’s going to stop Obama and the others from paying as much in surplus taxes as they see fit?
Surely, Treasury Boss Tim Geithner is not going to order that overpayments made knowingly and with free will be returned to the sender?
So either send a big fat check to the IRS or stifle all of the self-serving pap about how you should pay more!
By John W. Lillpop
Once again, Barack Obama has made headlines by saying and doing really foolish things just to pander to his base.
His latest quotable quote was issued to fan the fires of class warfare by calling attention to the issue of “income disparity” which Obama plans to use as a major reelection theme.
Such is life when an incumbent president is forced by fact to divert attention from his performance record, replete as it is with repeated failures and decimation of the American Dream, the U.S. Constitution, and what little civility existed in American politics before this ego-maniac seized power.
Joining a legion of phony-bologna lefties who know damn well that their offers to pay higher taxes will never be heeded, Obama said the following:
“I've been hearing a lot of these Republicans talking about, oh, that's class warfare, and he just wants to redistribute, and doesn't believe in work, and he's trying to create an entitlement society, and this and that and the other. Let me be absolutely clear: I should pay more taxes, and folks in my income bracket should pay more taxes, and certainly folks who are making billions of dollars should pay more taxes, not because I want to take their money and just give it to somebody else. It's because we've got basic investments and basic functions that have to be carried out in this 21st century if we're going to be able to compete.”
With all due respect to the president and liberals like George Soros whom are obsessed with crushing guilt over the ‘unfair’ success they enjoy, the following question must be posed:
Who the hell is stopping you from paying more? Why not put your money where you mouth is and send a bundle(s) of cash to the IRS just for the sake doing so?
Who’s going to stop Obama and the others from paying as much in surplus taxes as they see fit?
Surely, Treasury Boss Tim Geithner is not going to order that overpayments made knowingly and with free will be returned to the sender?
So either send a big fat check to the IRS or stifle all of the self-serving pap about how you should pay more!
The Legacy of Roe V. Wade: Human Life NOT Precious or Sacred
By John W. Lillpop
Forty-nine years ago, on January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court approved abortion on demand, thereby sanctioning the slaughter of innocent, helpless human lives and establishing infanticide as an inalienable right.
It is a day that will 'live in infamy' because of the egregious human rights violation that followed: 50-60 million human lives exterminated through abortion in the United States alone since the court issued its heartless death warrant for the unborn.
Roe V. Wade effectively rendered the precious nature and sanctity of all human life to be 'pious bologna.”
50-60 million lives is nearly seven times the number of Jews killed at the hands of Adolph Hitler, and more than the number of victims slaughtered by Joseph Stalin.
However, unlike those murdered by Hitler and Stalin, the 50-60 million fetuses killed in America had no political, social, or religious enemies.
Rather, they were innocent human lives waiting to experience the blessings of birth and the joys of life.
Those who believe that abortion should be an inalienable right refuse to accept an indisputable fact: A fetus is human life before birth
.
That says it all. Call that fetus what you wish, the fact remains that it is human life.
Albeit, the fetus is a life without power, voting rights, free speech or any other protection afforded the born. However, it is a human life, plain and simple.
In addition, human life, in all forms, is a precious gift from God regardless of how inconvenient the pregnancy may be.
Abortion, then, is a deliberate, premeditated destruction of one of God’s greatest blessings.
Abortion is a superseding of divine will by mortal will. Those who do so shall be held accountable at a final, and eternal, judgment.
Which is why, even in cases involving the most despicable subhuman killers, our society affords layer-upon-layer of legal review and appeal before using execution as the ultimate punishment.
Unfortunately, while some liberals fight to the bitter end to save the pathetic life of a thug convicted of multiple murders, there is no mercy or fight in them for the unborn--those with life before birth.
May good and righteousness ultimately prevail in the hearts of the American people, and replace a mindset that tolerates abortion on demand with one that celebrates “Life before Birth.”
Forty-nine years ago, on January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court approved abortion on demand, thereby sanctioning the slaughter of innocent, helpless human lives and establishing infanticide as an inalienable right.
It is a day that will 'live in infamy' because of the egregious human rights violation that followed: 50-60 million human lives exterminated through abortion in the United States alone since the court issued its heartless death warrant for the unborn.
Roe V. Wade effectively rendered the precious nature and sanctity of all human life to be 'pious bologna.”
50-60 million lives is nearly seven times the number of Jews killed at the hands of Adolph Hitler, and more than the number of victims slaughtered by Joseph Stalin.
However, unlike those murdered by Hitler and Stalin, the 50-60 million fetuses killed in America had no political, social, or religious enemies.
Rather, they were innocent human lives waiting to experience the blessings of birth and the joys of life.
Those who believe that abortion should be an inalienable right refuse to accept an indisputable fact: A fetus is human life before birth
.
That says it all. Call that fetus what you wish, the fact remains that it is human life.
Albeit, the fetus is a life without power, voting rights, free speech or any other protection afforded the born. However, it is a human life, plain and simple.
In addition, human life, in all forms, is a precious gift from God regardless of how inconvenient the pregnancy may be.
Abortion, then, is a deliberate, premeditated destruction of one of God’s greatest blessings.
Abortion is a superseding of divine will by mortal will. Those who do so shall be held accountable at a final, and eternal, judgment.
Which is why, even in cases involving the most despicable subhuman killers, our society affords layer-upon-layer of legal review and appeal before using execution as the ultimate punishment.
Unfortunately, while some liberals fight to the bitter end to save the pathetic life of a thug convicted of multiple murders, there is no mercy or fight in them for the unborn--those with life before birth.
May good and righteousness ultimately prevail in the hearts of the American people, and replace a mindset that tolerates abortion on demand with one that celebrates “Life before Birth.”
20.1.12
America MUST Make Peace With Newt Gingrich!
By John W. Lillpop
On a day in which America’s “leading from behind,” anti-jobs, incompetent, illegal- alien loser posing as President foolishly rejected an opportunity to put as many as 20,000 Americans back to work AND reduce national dependence on oil from the volatile middle east, a 68-year old conservative rebel pulled himself out of the trash bin and once again asserted himself as a force FOR America and Americans!
For damn near a month, Newt Gingrich has been relentlessly pummeled and battered by Republican colleagues, the mainstream media, and by his ex-wife.
So brutal and biting were the attacks on the Former Speaker of the U.S. House that it seemed as though this feisty little rooster had finally been subdued, albeit mostly by his own erratic behavior and temper, and exploitation of those frailties by damn near anyone with a voice.
At the start of the week, anti-Gingrich forces appeared to be on the brink of ending Newt’s presidential aspirations for 2012. South Carolina of the Old South was to be Newt’s Waterloo in an odd twist of irony as Mitt Romney steam-rolled into a double-digit lead.
The only question coming into South Carolina seemed to be how large would Romney’s win be? Newt seemed like a bad memory from the past.
But Newt Gingrich is NOT a docile sheep, ready to be led to slaughter. He is a fighter, with a mix of gonads and brains not often found among modern politicians.
Although the Gingrich recovery started at the debate on Monday night and was aided by Romney’s weaving and bobbing, Newt Gingrich let it be known on Thursday night that HE will NOT be buried alive by weak-kneed RINOs in conspiracy with left-wing ObamaMites posing as journalists.
CNN Obama apologist John King accommodated Newt’s latest surge by opening the debate with an inane question about the attempted execution of Newt by his ex-wife, a silly affair broadcast by ABC news, yet another outlet for Obama re-election poop!
Watching Newt dissect and disassemble the petrified John King may very well be the most poignant and instructive moment in the history of political broadcasting.
So intense, so exactly right was Newt’s withering reply that the live audience burst into applause and rose as one to cheer on the most honest comment made in the debate format all year!
Hail be to Newt! Somehow, he managed to win the day, albeit with an unintentional assist from CNN’s goofy King.
Bottom line: If Newt Gingrich does not win the GOP presidential nomination, he MUST be given a prominent role in the next administration.
Newt Gingrich is the most powerful pro-American voice in our nation. He must be listened to and used to help our nation heal from three years of Marxist abuse at the hands of Barack Obama.
God Bless Newt Gingrich!
On a day in which America’s “leading from behind,” anti-jobs, incompetent, illegal- alien loser posing as President foolishly rejected an opportunity to put as many as 20,000 Americans back to work AND reduce national dependence on oil from the volatile middle east, a 68-year old conservative rebel pulled himself out of the trash bin and once again asserted himself as a force FOR America and Americans!
For damn near a month, Newt Gingrich has been relentlessly pummeled and battered by Republican colleagues, the mainstream media, and by his ex-wife.
So brutal and biting were the attacks on the Former Speaker of the U.S. House that it seemed as though this feisty little rooster had finally been subdued, albeit mostly by his own erratic behavior and temper, and exploitation of those frailties by damn near anyone with a voice.
At the start of the week, anti-Gingrich forces appeared to be on the brink of ending Newt’s presidential aspirations for 2012. South Carolina of the Old South was to be Newt’s Waterloo in an odd twist of irony as Mitt Romney steam-rolled into a double-digit lead.
The only question coming into South Carolina seemed to be how large would Romney’s win be? Newt seemed like a bad memory from the past.
But Newt Gingrich is NOT a docile sheep, ready to be led to slaughter. He is a fighter, with a mix of gonads and brains not often found among modern politicians.
Although the Gingrich recovery started at the debate on Monday night and was aided by Romney’s weaving and bobbing, Newt Gingrich let it be known on Thursday night that HE will NOT be buried alive by weak-kneed RINOs in conspiracy with left-wing ObamaMites posing as journalists.
CNN Obama apologist John King accommodated Newt’s latest surge by opening the debate with an inane question about the attempted execution of Newt by his ex-wife, a silly affair broadcast by ABC news, yet another outlet for Obama re-election poop!
Watching Newt dissect and disassemble the petrified John King may very well be the most poignant and instructive moment in the history of political broadcasting.
So intense, so exactly right was Newt’s withering reply that the live audience burst into applause and rose as one to cheer on the most honest comment made in the debate format all year!
Hail be to Newt! Somehow, he managed to win the day, albeit with an unintentional assist from CNN’s goofy King.
Bottom line: If Newt Gingrich does not win the GOP presidential nomination, he MUST be given a prominent role in the next administration.
Newt Gingrich is the most powerful pro-American voice in our nation. He must be listened to and used to help our nation heal from three years of Marxist abuse at the hands of Barack Obama.
God Bless Newt Gingrich!
18.1.12
Is Paula Deen to Blame for YOUR Diabetes?
By John W. Lillpop
Celebrity Chef Paula Deen’s recent admission that she is a Type-2 diabetic may provide an unexpected boost to the depressed Obama economy by lowering unemployment among out-of-work ambulance chasers, otherwise know as litigation attorneys.
Indeed, as reported at the reference, in part, the “Not-so-skinny bitch” has opened herself to financial ruin and disgrace by openly admitting that she has diabetes, a fact which should surprise no one given Deen's love affair with high-fat and flavor:
With Deen’s admission this morning that she’s had Type 2 Diabetes – and has known since 2008 – the backlash has been fierce.As would be expected, anti-pleasure food scrooges, inspired by the words, if not deeds, of FLOTUS Michelle Obama, are outraged to the point of distraction.
Long a proponent of high-fat foods that may contribute to a host of health issues, the question now is: will she be able to eat her own cooking? If her Skillet Fried Apple Pie is any indication, she may need to sign a waiver before sitting down for dessert.
Up until today, the 65-year-old Deen has been fanatical about fat and the flavor it provides. Often using a whole stick of butter in recipes and frying everything from spinach to ice cream, the chef seems to have been abiding by the motto: Live a Little. Just not for Long!”
As an example, Anthony Bourdain, the Travel Channel's resident Curmudgeon/Cook – never a fan of Deen’s - said today,
"When your signature dish is hamburger in between a doughnut, and you've been cheerfully selling this stuff knowing all along that you've got Type 2 diabetes ... it's in bad taste if nothing else."
Bite your tongue, Bourdain! If there is one thing Deen is NOT guilty of it is “bad taste.” Try one of her Skillet Fried Apple Pie treats and see for yourself.
Meanwhile, corrupt litigation attorneys are salivating at the very thought of multi-billion dollar class action law suits to be filed against Deen and those who promoted her lethal shows.
Millions of slothful slobs will be joined together as plaintiffs, portrayed as neglected and abused viewers and eaters, innocent victims of the Deen Ponzi scheme.
Deen’s strongest defense may be the following, also found at the reference
“When asked by Oprah Winfrey in 2007 how she dealt with criticism that the Southern Cooking Queen’s recipes were too high in fat, Paula Deen took it in stride.
“Honey, I’m your cook, not your doctor,” Deen said, to wild applause from the audience.”
In other words: Ignorance is no excuse: YOU ate the damn food.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/entertainment/tv/hypocrite-chef-paula-deen-says-she-has-diabetes
17.1.12
Whither the Huntsman “Ticket to Ride”?
By John W. Lillpop
As if the Republican nominating process were not goofy enough, Jon Huntsman added to the strangeness by ending his bid for the nomination on Monday.
Goofy, because just last Tuesday Huntsman was celebrating his third-place finish in New Hampshire with a nostalgic reference to the Beatles’ 1965 hit record, “Ticket to Ride.”
As reported at the reference, in part:
“THE path ahead for US presidential hopeful Mitt Romney was cleared of another hurdle yesterday when Jon Huntsman withdrew from the Republican campaign trail and threw his support behind the man who was previously a bitter rival.Excuse me, Governor, but just how is your campaign to build “a better and more trustworthy America” enhanced by endorsing a man whose polices make him completely unelectable?
Barely four days after declaring that Mr. Romney’s policies were making him “completely unelectable” as the Republican candidate for November’s election, Mr. Huntsman performed a massive about-face and praised the former Massachusetts governor’s credentials.
The announcement comes just five days before the crucial South Carolina primary, at which the surging Mr. Romney, winner of recent contests in Iowa and New Hampshire, is predicted to all but guarantee his party’s nomination to oppose president Barack Obama.
Mr. Huntsman, a Mormon former governor of Utah and a recent US ambassador to China, admitted that his own decision to enter the race had been “the longest of long shots”.
“Today our campaign for the presidency ends but our campaign to build a better and more trustworthy America continues,” he said at a press conference in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.”
If as you said last week, Romney is indeed unelectable, that means that Barack Obama will win.
With all due respect, sir, how can another four-year term of Marxist amateurism at the hands of the incompetent and insufferably arrogant Barack Obama make America better and more trustworthy?
And what pray tell happened to your vaunted “Ticket to Ride,” sir?
http://www.scotsman.com/news/international/jon_huntsman_withdraws_from_race_to_top_job_1_2060169
16.1.12
MLK Would Be Disappointed by Barack Obama and Eric Holder!
By John W. Lillpop
Dr. Martin Luther King would have turned 83 years old today. In his honor, the first Monday of each January is set aside in America to remember the life and contributions of this great political and spiritual leader.
On August 28, 1963, Dr. King delivered his masterful, “I have a dream” speech on the steps on the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. That speech is still memorialized as one of the most eloquent, uplifting and inspirational addresses ever delivered by a freedom-loving citizen on American soil.
Modern technology makes Dr. King’s magnificent speech available to be read again and again, word for word, by referring to Reference 1.
Two of the most memorable passages from the MLK speech are these:
And the following words with which King closed his classic:
Nearly 50 years after Dr. King shared his hope and dreams with the nation and the world, America is governed by an African-American President who has, in turn, appointed an African- American Attorney General, Eric Holder.
All these years later, one cannot help but wonder how the deeds and words of Barack Obama and Eric Holder might be regarded by Dr. King?
Would Dr. King find that the Obama-Holder sense of justice is consistent with that of men committed to abiding by the rule of law, rather than being prejudiced by skin pigmentation?
How might Dr. King react to the fact that members of the New Black Panthers Party defiantly intimidated voters at a polling place in Philadelphia during the 2008 elections, but that Attorney General Eric Holder refused to prosecute “his people” for such egregious interference?
And that Barack Obama enthusiastically supported Eric Holder’s racially-driven reluctance?
Where is the passion for “color-free” justice based on character? Do King’s words hold no meaning for the black President or Attorney General?
Full details about this incident and Holder’s disgraceful indifference are provided at Reference 2.
Of more recent vintage is Eric Holder’s shameful assault on the Voting Rights Act in South Carolina. As reported at Reference 3, in part:
Ref 1
http://www.usconstitution.net/dream.html
Ref 2
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/03/eric-holder-black-panther-case-demeans-my-people/
Ref 3:
http://pjmedia.com/blog/eric-holder-voter-id-and-the-chicago-way/
Dr. Martin Luther King would have turned 83 years old today. In his honor, the first Monday of each January is set aside in America to remember the life and contributions of this great political and spiritual leader.
On August 28, 1963, Dr. King delivered his masterful, “I have a dream” speech on the steps on the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, D.C. That speech is still memorialized as one of the most eloquent, uplifting and inspirational addresses ever delivered by a freedom-loving citizen on American soil.
Modern technology makes Dr. King’s magnificent speech available to be read again and again, word for word, by referring to Reference 1.
Two of the most memorable passages from the MLK speech are these:
“I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character.”
And the following words with which King closed his classic:
“And when we allow freedom to ring, when we let it ring from every village and every hamlet, from every state and every city, we will be able to speed up that day when all of God's children, black men and white men, Jews and Gentiles, Protestants and Catholics, will be able to join hands and sing in the words of the old Negro spiritual, ‘Free at last! free at last! thank God Almighty, we are free at last!’”
Nearly 50 years after Dr. King shared his hope and dreams with the nation and the world, America is governed by an African-American President who has, in turn, appointed an African- American Attorney General, Eric Holder.
All these years later, one cannot help but wonder how the deeds and words of Barack Obama and Eric Holder might be regarded by Dr. King?
Would Dr. King find that the Obama-Holder sense of justice is consistent with that of men committed to abiding by the rule of law, rather than being prejudiced by skin pigmentation?
How might Dr. King react to the fact that members of the New Black Panthers Party defiantly intimidated voters at a polling place in Philadelphia during the 2008 elections, but that Attorney General Eric Holder refused to prosecute “his people” for such egregious interference?
And that Barack Obama enthusiastically supported Eric Holder’s racially-driven reluctance?
Where is the passion for “color-free” justice based on character? Do King’s words hold no meaning for the black President or Attorney General?
Full details about this incident and Holder’s disgraceful indifference are provided at Reference 2.
Of more recent vintage is Eric Holder’s shameful assault on the Voting Rights Act in South Carolina. As reported at Reference 3, in part:
As Eric Holder — the brains behind both the Fast and Furious gun-running scam and the decision to vacate a conviction of Black Panthers who stood at a Philadelphia polling place harassing white voters — would tell you, South Carolina is not interested in safeguarding the integrity of the franchise.Sadly, it appears as though the lofty standards of decency voiced by Dr. King are meaningless when it comes to our black President and Attorney General!
Those southerners are just trying to prevent minorities from voting. The hard-won battle over the Voting Rights Act is being overturned. Liberals need to prepare to resist or face a return to the ugly days of Jim Crow!
So, what’s really going on here? Liberals love to wax unbearably about culture, but they never want to ask the difficult questions about how one’s socialization into a political culture influences one’s view of the political world, or how that socialization shapes the way the struggle for political power is fought.
Obama’s Chicago is notorious for its corrupt voting practices.
In fact, one of the latest political jokes in Chicago is that there is now empirical and incontrovertible evidence that Muammar Gaddafi and Osama bin Laden are both dead.
Their names recently appeared on the city’s voting rolls.
In Obama’s world, elections are not contested; they are manipulated. In the 2008 Iowa caucuses, red and white chartered buses with Illinois license plates carried African Americans from Chicago to vote in Iowa. Obama’s ability to show that he could win in a rural, white, and somewhat conservative state like Iowa wasn’t a miracle; it was election engineering, the Chicago Way.
In anticipation of a hard-fought contest in 2012, President Obama wants to make sure that there is significant margin for voter fraud, especially getting illegal immigrants to vote. No one needs to tell you how illegal immigrants will vote. And pro-Obama organizations, like ACORN, have traditionally engaged in massive election fraud. Anything that enhances the integrity of the voting process works against Obama.”
Ref 1
http://www.usconstitution.net/dream.html
Ref 2
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2011/03/eric-holder-black-panther-case-demeans-my-people/
Ref 3:
http://pjmedia.com/blog/eric-holder-voter-id-and-the-chicago-way/
15.1.12
Tewbow Mauling Proves that God Is Dead: Right?
By John W. Lillpop
Tim Tewbow’s improbable fairytale season came to a screeching halt on Saturday at the hands of the New England Patriots in Foxborough, Mass.
Rather than the all-enthralling nail biter that had been promised, the Tom Brady vs. Tim Tebow epic was almost over before it began.
The much-ballyhooed war ended in an ungodly rout of the affable Christian quarterback who captured the imagination of the entire sports world while completely pissing off leftist windbags like Bill Maher.
Maher is the cranky curmudgeon who hates the fact that his intellect is no more magnificent than that bestowed on common folk, and who, in a fit of pique over being robbed of his rightful genius, tries to cover up his shortcomings by denying that God exists, a protestation almost always associated with one operating with an IQ of 170, or greater.
Think there is no such thing as God? Brother, you MUST be a genius!
No doubt Maher was on his knees thanking Satan and his legion of angels as Tebow and the Denver team fell 45-10.
All of which proves that Maher is a genius AND that God is dead, if he ever existed, right?
There are other possibilities.
For instance, perhaps God answered the supplications of Tom Brady or other Patriots’ players? Why would He abandon his faithful servant Tebow at a time His hand was most urgently needed? Who knows?
Or perhaps Tim Tebow did not actually pray for God to deliver a W, but rather prayed for a clean, well-played contest in which no player was seriously injured?
Or consider the possibility that Tebow actually prayed FOR BRADY to win, given the fact that Brady has fallen on tough times recently?
Say what? Praying for one’s enemies? What sort of spiritual mumbo-jumbo is that?
It’s called Christian Love, Bill. It’s REALLY what Jesus is all about.
No one in his or her right mind would really believe that the Lord gives a hoot about 22 oversized zombies romping around on 100 yards of grass just to control an inflated bag of dead pigskin!
Even Bill Maher can’t be THAT simple-minded. Right?
Obama Really Looking to Downsize Government? Don’t Be Silly!
By John W. Lillpop
Over the past three years, Americans have learned quite a lot about the mind and manners of Barack Hussein Obama, America’s greatest electoral disaster.
One fact stands out from all others about America’s failed experiment with affirmative action and diversity : The man someone installed as the 44th President of these United States is unabashedly and unstintingly an advocate for more intrusive government interference into every aspect of human life, notwithstanding specific and implied guarantees against onerous government set forth in the U.S. Constitution.
In Obama's progressive mindset, the U.S. Constitution is nothing more than an outdated relic promulgated by a band of reckless, white vigilante outlaws and slave owners from the middle of the 18th century.
When appropriate, Obama and people of his ilk would eagerly extend the philosophy of unfettered nanny-state fascism to certain dumb animals which, according to progressives, are endangered by human greed and neglect.
It’s ‘government by elitists and for elitists’ in the Obama world.
The Obama progressive vision for America demands huge sources of capital, otherwise known as taxes, to fund the very meddling which the forefathers attempted to eradicate by kicking the British out during the only justifiable “Occupy” movement in U.S. history.
To genuine, die-hard lefties like Obama, government exists solely for the purpose of levying taxes and fees against private enterprise and the allegedly well-to-do, and redistributing said monies to the allegedly poor and near poor in order to “level the playing field,” a term, incidentally, which cannot be found in the Constitution.
Contemporary liberals have upped the moral ante for “soaking the rich” by expanding the vernacular of class warfare to include the notion that the blessed are obligated to pay their “far share,” another Marxist term not found in the U.S. Constitution, but which is prominent in thinking expressed by Communists and Democrats in general.
All of which makes Barack Obama’s recent proposal to “streamline government” in need of intense scrutiny and managed skepticism, once the hysterical laughing has subsided.
As reported recently throughout the media:
The cut and slash president?
Consider, please, this unpublished report: Unnamed and unreliable insiders, speaking on condition of absolute anonymity, report that once his Consolidate and Shrink strategy for business is proven, Obama plans to expand the concept to the military.
Under Obama’s plan, the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines would be consolidated into a lean, mean mini-force called the Department of Peace and Harmony with branches in Australia and Uganda only. This department would be headed by Ron Paul in exchange for Paul’s release of his rowdy fans to the Obama 2012 reelection campaign. (Satire)
The obvious fly in the Obama ointment is giving this president more unilateral power. That is an idea whose time is not likely to arrive any time soon, provided there really is an all-caring, loving God!
Puleeeeeeeeeeeeeeze fellow Americans, do not fall for the latest Obama scheme!
Over the past three years, Americans have learned quite a lot about the mind and manners of Barack Hussein Obama, America’s greatest electoral disaster.
One fact stands out from all others about America’s failed experiment with affirmative action and diversity : The man someone installed as the 44th President of these United States is unabashedly and unstintingly an advocate for more intrusive government interference into every aspect of human life, notwithstanding specific and implied guarantees against onerous government set forth in the U.S. Constitution.
In Obama's progressive mindset, the U.S. Constitution is nothing more than an outdated relic promulgated by a band of reckless, white vigilante outlaws and slave owners from the middle of the 18th century.
When appropriate, Obama and people of his ilk would eagerly extend the philosophy of unfettered nanny-state fascism to certain dumb animals which, according to progressives, are endangered by human greed and neglect.
It’s ‘government by elitists and for elitists’ in the Obama world.
The Obama progressive vision for America demands huge sources of capital, otherwise known as taxes, to fund the very meddling which the forefathers attempted to eradicate by kicking the British out during the only justifiable “Occupy” movement in U.S. history.
To genuine, die-hard lefties like Obama, government exists solely for the purpose of levying taxes and fees against private enterprise and the allegedly well-to-do, and redistributing said monies to the allegedly poor and near poor in order to “level the playing field,” a term, incidentally, which cannot be found in the Constitution.
Contemporary liberals have upped the moral ante for “soaking the rich” by expanding the vernacular of class warfare to include the notion that the blessed are obligated to pay their “far share,” another Marxist term not found in the U.S. Constitution, but which is prominent in thinking expressed by Communists and Democrats in general.
All of which makes Barack Obama’s recent proposal to “streamline government” in need of intense scrutiny and managed skepticism, once the hysterical laughing has subsided.
As reported recently throughout the media:
Announcing this morning that he is seeking authority to streamline the executive branch, President Obama said he needs the same kind of "authority that every business owner has to make sure that his or her company keeps pace with the times. And let me be clear: I will only use this authority for reforms that result in more efficiency, better service, and a leaner government."Barack Obama, the warrior-slayer against big government?
As an example, the president wants to shut down the Department of Commerce, taking its core functions and giving them to a new agency that will also fold in the tasks of the Small Business Administration, the U.S. Trade Representative, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the Trade and Development Agency and the Export-Import Bank.
"Right now, there are six departments and agencies focused primarily on business and trade in the federal government," the president said. "Six. In this case, six isn't better than one. It's redundant and inefficient. With the authority I am requesting today, we could consolidate them all into one department with one website, one phone number and one mission - helping American businesses succeed."
The cut and slash president?
Consider, please, this unpublished report: Unnamed and unreliable insiders, speaking on condition of absolute anonymity, report that once his Consolidate and Shrink strategy for business is proven, Obama plans to expand the concept to the military.
Under Obama’s plan, the Army, Navy, Air Force, and Marines would be consolidated into a lean, mean mini-force called the Department of Peace and Harmony with branches in Australia and Uganda only. This department would be headed by Ron Paul in exchange for Paul’s release of his rowdy fans to the Obama 2012 reelection campaign. (Satire)
The obvious fly in the Obama ointment is giving this president more unilateral power. That is an idea whose time is not likely to arrive any time soon, provided there really is an all-caring, loving God!
Puleeeeeeeeeeeeeeze fellow Americans, do not fall for the latest Obama scheme!
14.1.12
Finally Seeing Dark at End of Tunnel, “Zany” Newt Retreats!
By John W. Lillpop
Mitt Romney recently referred to Newt Gingrich, at one point a formidable Romney opponent, as “zany.”
According to the dictionary, zany means, “one who plays the clown or fool in order to amuse others; a comically wild or eccentric person.”
Kudos to Romney for his spot-on dissection of Gingrich, the eccentric clown whom has attacked one of the basic tenets of conservative ideology, that being free markets and capitalism.
Although Gingrich’s kamikaze performance failed to amuse anyone with even a modicum of concern about the future of America, and the grave threat posed by the prospect of yet another four years under the Marxist, “Leading from Behind,” failed personage of Barack Obama, Newt did tickle the fancy and favor of several prominent Democrats and thinkers in Obama’s reelection campaign.
Unreliable sources, operating under the cloak of anonymity, have reported that Team Obama has gone so far as to offer Newt a gig as Court Jester during Obama’s second –term Inaugural Party, should such calamity, in fact, eventuate and doom our great nation.
That offer, although not official in any sense, has apparently convinced Newt the Worm to rethink his scorched-earth assault on America, the GOP, and the overall common good.
As reported, in part, at the reference:
Pity it took you so damn long to see the darkness that your foolish prank may visit upon this great nation and people!
Reference
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-campaign-20120114,0,2284640.story
Mitt Romney recently referred to Newt Gingrich, at one point a formidable Romney opponent, as “zany.”
According to the dictionary, zany means, “one who plays the clown or fool in order to amuse others; a comically wild or eccentric person.”
Kudos to Romney for his spot-on dissection of Gingrich, the eccentric clown whom has attacked one of the basic tenets of conservative ideology, that being free markets and capitalism.
Although Gingrich’s kamikaze performance failed to amuse anyone with even a modicum of concern about the future of America, and the grave threat posed by the prospect of yet another four years under the Marxist, “Leading from Behind,” failed personage of Barack Obama, Newt did tickle the fancy and favor of several prominent Democrats and thinkers in Obama’s reelection campaign.
Unreliable sources, operating under the cloak of anonymity, have reported that Team Obama has gone so far as to offer Newt a gig as Court Jester during Obama’s second –term Inaugural Party, should such calamity, in fact, eventuate and doom our great nation.
That offer, although not official in any sense, has apparently convinced Newt the Worm to rethink his scorched-earth assault on America, the GOP, and the overall common good.
As reported, in part, at the reference:
Reporting from Orlando, Fla.— Saying he does not want false claims made on his behalf, Newt Gingrich on Friday called on a "super PAC" that supports him to withdraw commercials it ran in South Carolina criticizing Mitt Romney and his former company, Bain Capital.“Factual errors,” Mr. Speaker? How precious of you to admit your mistakes and accept responsibility!
The Republican presidential candidate made the call to a crowd of supporters at his new Orlando campaign headquarters, saying there was no way he could legally contact Winning Our Future to make the request directly.
Winning Our Future aired a 29-minute commercial, fashioned as a political documentary, accusing Romney and Bain of greed. It features interviews with former employees of companies acquired by Bain who complain that the venture capital firm wreaked economic havoc on their small towns.
Rick Tyler, a spokesman for the PAC, responded that he was "aware of and [shared] the speaker's concerns about accuracy," and promised that a more thorough response would be forthcoming.
The full-length video, as well as 30-second TV ads based on it and two-minute versions available on the Internet, were roundly criticized by Romney and his campaign as inaccurate. Independent observers including the Washington Post have confirmed inaccuracies.
"It's important why my campaign is different than some other people's campaigns," Gingrich told a crowd of about 150 supporters.
"I've said all along that these super PACs ought to have some sense of responsibility. The ad for example that Gov. Romney is running in Florida right now about me was given four 'Pinocchios' by the Washington Post, which means it was wrong at least four times in 30 seconds, which is not easy," Gingrich said.
"This morning we found out this new 30-minute film on Gov. Romney and Bain has some factual errors in it, from the same Washington Post fact-checkers," Gingrich said. "I am calling on this super PAC … to either edit out every single mistake or to pull the entire film."
Pity it took you so damn long to see the darkness that your foolish prank may visit upon this great nation and people!
Reference
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-campaign-20120114,0,2284640.story
13.1.12
More Egregious: Bane of Bain, or “Fast and Furious”?
By John W. Lillpop
Thanks to Newt Gingrich and those who have funded his latest maniac episode, the Republican Party and Mitt Romney are being forced to defend themselves from attacks against the very concept of free-market capitalism.
Republicans savagely attacking other Republicans for engaging in free-market capitalism during a vital presidential election year?
Good grief, Ronald Reagan must be turning over in his grave!
Knowledgeable pundits like conservative Charles Krauthammer have issued ominious warnings about the impact that Gingrich’s bitter tirade might have in the 2012 elections.
For example, should Romney become the eventual Republican nominee, ObamaMites in the White House will have an anti-capitalism, anti-Romney attack campaign ready to use, after some minor editing.
Said campaign will be based on the exact words of a contemporary Republican presidential candidate and former Speaker, which include the following words about Bain:
“This is a story of greed, of playing the system for a quick buck, a group of corporate raiders led by Mitt Romney more ruthless than Wall Street. For tens of thousands of Americans, the suffering began when Mitt Romney came to town.”
Most significantly, Obama will have a cool $1 billion dollars, the Bully Pulpit of the Presidency, and the leftist mainstream-media available to proliferate all anti-Romney misspeak uttered by the former Speaker into every household in every language spoken in America
It may very well be the bane of Bain for Romney. And it may lead to the reelection of the worst president in U.S. history in an election year that is pivotal and crucial for the survival of America.
Thanks Newt Gingrich! For exactly nothing!
For this and your branding of the Paul Ryan budget as “right-wing social engineering,” your cavorting with Nancy Pelosi on the issue of Global Warming, and your despicable feeding at the public trough of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the tune of $1.6 million, you deserve to be excommunicated from the GOP for life.
While Gingrich’s assault on free-enterprise and Mitt Romney may indeed lead to another four years of Marxist amateurism at the White House and be the final nail in the death of the American Dream, the Mitt Romney forces should use the Gingrich assault as a model for preparing for the lies and distortions sure to come from the Obama campaign tyrants.
Defending Romney’s term as CEO of Bain should be akin to promoting apple pie and motherhood. For instance, as reported, in part, at the reference concerning the ad-movie issued by Gingrich
In sum, firms like Bain exist to give a smidgen of hope to businesses on the fast track to bankruptcy and going belly up. Sure enough, some of that hope turns to anguish, but at least there is a chance at success, albeit small, for the beleaguered business owners and their employees.
Yes, Bain made money. Yes, people lost their jobs.
Those are simply facts of life under a capitalist system that has produced the greatest prosperity in the history of the world!
Other important considerations pertain: For example, how does Romney’s work at Bain compare to Barack Obama’s stated objective of using government to DELIBERATELY bankrupt the coal industry, thereby destroying jobs and prosperity opportunities?
During the 2008 campaign, a naïve Barack Obama crowed about the ability of government to use regulation and enforcement to bankrupt business interests which the Left opposes ideologically.
Like coal.
And as we have seen over the past three years, Obama’s anti-American, anti-business obsession has been unleashed on American businesses time and again.
Obama’s rejection of the Keystone Pipeline is a perfect example of his willingness to forsake thousands of American jobs and energy dependence in order to pander to environmentalists!
By contrast, Romney’s work at Bain was not a deliberate attempt to bankrupt any one, or to cause anyone to lose his or her job.
Then we have the Solyndra folly in which Obama tyrants actually granted tax-payer funded loans to companies SOLELY because Solyndra was engaged in an energy source (solar) which the president favors.
Even worse, ObamaMites rewrote the rules to favor Solyndra investors over taxpayers by giving investors first claim against Solyndra in the event of bankruptcy.
Of course, Solyndra did eventually go bankrupt, leaving taxpayers with the $500 million tab for Obama’s foolish environmental myopia. In addition, 1200 jobs were lost.
Remember too, that Obama requested that Solyndra delay lay off notices until after the 2010 elections.
Perhaps the most poignant example of Obama’s evil use of government against the American people and business is found in the “Fast and Furious” scandal in which Obama and Eric Holder, die-hard anti-2nd Amendment zealots, deliberately arranged for dangerous weapons to be “walked” across the Mexican border and into the hands of Mexican cartels, the notorious terrorists who actually run Mexico.
This Obama-Holder atrocity cost an American border patrol agent his life and killed innocent Mexican citizens their lives as well.
Again, the loss of life was the result of Obama’s deliberate attempt to water down the 2nd Amendment with foolish gun control measures.
By comparison, Bain Capital resulted in no known deaths and no attempt by government to subvert an important Amendment to the Constitution.
Thus it should be perfectly clear that the correct answer to the question, “More Egregious: Bane of Bain, or ‘Fast and Furious’? is:
Forget Four More Years! We need change now!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/four-pinocchios-for-king-of-bain/2012/01/12/gIQADX8WuP_blog.html
Thanks to Newt Gingrich and those who have funded his latest maniac episode, the Republican Party and Mitt Romney are being forced to defend themselves from attacks against the very concept of free-market capitalism.
Republicans savagely attacking other Republicans for engaging in free-market capitalism during a vital presidential election year?
Good grief, Ronald Reagan must be turning over in his grave!
Knowledgeable pundits like conservative Charles Krauthammer have issued ominious warnings about the impact that Gingrich’s bitter tirade might have in the 2012 elections.
For example, should Romney become the eventual Republican nominee, ObamaMites in the White House will have an anti-capitalism, anti-Romney attack campaign ready to use, after some minor editing.
Said campaign will be based on the exact words of a contemporary Republican presidential candidate and former Speaker, which include the following words about Bain:
“This is a story of greed, of playing the system for a quick buck, a group of corporate raiders led by Mitt Romney more ruthless than Wall Street. For tens of thousands of Americans, the suffering began when Mitt Romney came to town.”
Most significantly, Obama will have a cool $1 billion dollars, the Bully Pulpit of the Presidency, and the leftist mainstream-media available to proliferate all anti-Romney misspeak uttered by the former Speaker into every household in every language spoken in America
It may very well be the bane of Bain for Romney. And it may lead to the reelection of the worst president in U.S. history in an election year that is pivotal and crucial for the survival of America.
Thanks Newt Gingrich! For exactly nothing!
For this and your branding of the Paul Ryan budget as “right-wing social engineering,” your cavorting with Nancy Pelosi on the issue of Global Warming, and your despicable feeding at the public trough of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to the tune of $1.6 million, you deserve to be excommunicated from the GOP for life.
While Gingrich’s assault on free-enterprise and Mitt Romney may indeed lead to another four years of Marxist amateurism at the White House and be the final nail in the death of the American Dream, the Mitt Romney forces should use the Gingrich assault as a model for preparing for the lies and distortions sure to come from the Obama campaign tyrants.
Defending Romney’s term as CEO of Bain should be akin to promoting apple pie and motherhood. For instance, as reported, in part, at the reference concerning the ad-movie issued by Gingrich
“First of all, it is a stretch to portray Romney as some sort of corporate raider, akin to Carl Icahn (whose image is briefly seen). Bain Capital initially was in the business of providing venture capital — seed money — for start-ups, such as Staples. Then it moved to the more lucrative business of private equity, in which Bain won control of firms, reorganized them and then sold them for profit.
Private equity deals, such as leveraged buyouts in which the company borrows lots of debt, can be more rewarding but also more risky. Some of those deals went bad for Bain, which sometimes happens in finance, though the company usually made money anyway. New York magazine, which the film cites as a source, recently ran an excellent profile of Romney in which it explored Romney’s pioneering role in the then-emerging field of private equity. Private equity revolutionized American business, demanding efficiencies (which can mean layoffs) and helping place much more emphasis on increasing shareholder value.
The movie pejoratively claims that the “Bain Way” was shorthand for being able to “turn the misfortunes of others into their enormous financial gains.” Bain Capital was actually an offshoot of Bain & Company, a consulting firm, and the “Bain Way” refers to its heavily analytical and data-driven approach to problems.”
In sum, firms like Bain exist to give a smidgen of hope to businesses on the fast track to bankruptcy and going belly up. Sure enough, some of that hope turns to anguish, but at least there is a chance at success, albeit small, for the beleaguered business owners and their employees.
Yes, Bain made money. Yes, people lost their jobs.
Those are simply facts of life under a capitalist system that has produced the greatest prosperity in the history of the world!
Other important considerations pertain: For example, how does Romney’s work at Bain compare to Barack Obama’s stated objective of using government to DELIBERATELY bankrupt the coal industry, thereby destroying jobs and prosperity opportunities?
During the 2008 campaign, a naïve Barack Obama crowed about the ability of government to use regulation and enforcement to bankrupt business interests which the Left opposes ideologically.
Like coal.
And as we have seen over the past three years, Obama’s anti-American, anti-business obsession has been unleashed on American businesses time and again.
Obama’s rejection of the Keystone Pipeline is a perfect example of his willingness to forsake thousands of American jobs and energy dependence in order to pander to environmentalists!
By contrast, Romney’s work at Bain was not a deliberate attempt to bankrupt any one, or to cause anyone to lose his or her job.
Then we have the Solyndra folly in which Obama tyrants actually granted tax-payer funded loans to companies SOLELY because Solyndra was engaged in an energy source (solar) which the president favors.
Even worse, ObamaMites rewrote the rules to favor Solyndra investors over taxpayers by giving investors first claim against Solyndra in the event of bankruptcy.
Of course, Solyndra did eventually go bankrupt, leaving taxpayers with the $500 million tab for Obama’s foolish environmental myopia. In addition, 1200 jobs were lost.
Remember too, that Obama requested that Solyndra delay lay off notices until after the 2010 elections.
Perhaps the most poignant example of Obama’s evil use of government against the American people and business is found in the “Fast and Furious” scandal in which Obama and Eric Holder, die-hard anti-2nd Amendment zealots, deliberately arranged for dangerous weapons to be “walked” across the Mexican border and into the hands of Mexican cartels, the notorious terrorists who actually run Mexico.
This Obama-Holder atrocity cost an American border patrol agent his life and killed innocent Mexican citizens their lives as well.
Again, the loss of life was the result of Obama’s deliberate attempt to water down the 2nd Amendment with foolish gun control measures.
By comparison, Bain Capital resulted in no known deaths and no attempt by government to subvert an important Amendment to the Constitution.
Thus it should be perfectly clear that the correct answer to the question, “More Egregious: Bane of Bain, or ‘Fast and Furious’? is:
Forget Four More Years! We need change now!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/four-pinocchios-for-king-of-bain/2012/01/12/gIQADX8WuP_blog.html
9.1.12
Open Letter to California Governor Jerry Brown: Illegal Aliens and the State Budget Deficit
January 9, 2012
Dear Governor;
The new calendar year has barely rolled out and already California faces yet another multi-billion dollar deficit in the state budget. In order to deal with the deficit, you have asked taxpayers to pass a referendum that will raise income taxes at a time when the economy is already in deep recession, or worse.
You have also warned that should the people refuse to raise taxes, it will be necessary for your administration to cut $4.2 from education programs that serve our children K-12.
With all due respect, sir, California citizens deserve better than to be pummeled with more taxes or inferior education.
As you know, our state spends approximately $10 billion per year to educate, house, and provide medical care for illegal aliens, vagrant invaders who have no moral or legal basis for being in America or California.
It is no coincidence that our budget deficit is approximately the same as the amount that is wasted on illegal aliens.
And despite the ruinous effects of illegal aliens on our economy, culture and language, your administration has approved legislation like the Dream Act, which will reward illegal aliens with lower tuition, at the same time that AMERICAN CITIZENS will be forced to accept less.
Many misguided city leaders have designated their cities as “Sanctuary Cities,” where federal immigration laws and procedures are ignored to protect those who simply do not belong here.
About 30 percent of the costs associated with our penal system is for handling illegal aliens. Billions of dollars are involved.
Governor, I realize that immigration is largely a federal issue. However, I believe that you have abdicated your responsibility to AMERICAN CITIZENS by virtue of your pro-illegal alien actions and failure to speak out strongly in opposition to the wrong-minded policies of the Obama Administration.
Sir, the time has come to honor the needs of Citizens rather than coddling and pandering to illegal aliens.
I urge you to use your office and political prestige to pressure President Obama and leaders in the U.S. House and Senate to begin the process of enforcing laws currently in effect.
That means let’s begin the process of deporting those who do not belong here.
Let’s eliminate the outrageous amount of money spent on illegal aliens and focus on meeting the needs of American citizens.
Regards,
JOHN W LILLPOP
San Jose Ca
Dear Governor;
The new calendar year has barely rolled out and already California faces yet another multi-billion dollar deficit in the state budget. In order to deal with the deficit, you have asked taxpayers to pass a referendum that will raise income taxes at a time when the economy is already in deep recession, or worse.
You have also warned that should the people refuse to raise taxes, it will be necessary for your administration to cut $4.2 from education programs that serve our children K-12.
With all due respect, sir, California citizens deserve better than to be pummeled with more taxes or inferior education.
As you know, our state spends approximately $10 billion per year to educate, house, and provide medical care for illegal aliens, vagrant invaders who have no moral or legal basis for being in America or California.
It is no coincidence that our budget deficit is approximately the same as the amount that is wasted on illegal aliens.
And despite the ruinous effects of illegal aliens on our economy, culture and language, your administration has approved legislation like the Dream Act, which will reward illegal aliens with lower tuition, at the same time that AMERICAN CITIZENS will be forced to accept less.
Many misguided city leaders have designated their cities as “Sanctuary Cities,” where federal immigration laws and procedures are ignored to protect those who simply do not belong here.
About 30 percent of the costs associated with our penal system is for handling illegal aliens. Billions of dollars are involved.
Governor, I realize that immigration is largely a federal issue. However, I believe that you have abdicated your responsibility to AMERICAN CITIZENS by virtue of your pro-illegal alien actions and failure to speak out strongly in opposition to the wrong-minded policies of the Obama Administration.
Sir, the time has come to honor the needs of Citizens rather than coddling and pandering to illegal aliens.
I urge you to use your office and political prestige to pressure President Obama and leaders in the U.S. House and Senate to begin the process of enforcing laws currently in effect.
That means let’s begin the process of deporting those who do not belong here.
Let’s eliminate the outrageous amount of money spent on illegal aliens and focus on meeting the needs of American citizens.
Regards,
JOHN W LILLPOP
San Jose Ca
7.1.12
Why in Bloody Hell Would Anyone “Celebrate” Another Birthday?
By John W. Lillpop
In the way of disclosure, January 7 is my birthday. The year of my arrival is irrelevant. Besides, I am bitterly opposed to the evil practice of age discrimination; withholding the year of my birth is my small contribution to the fight against ageism.
Suffice it to say that I am old enough to know better, but too damn old to do “it,” whatever it might be.
As a Capricorn, I share the zodiac sign of many famous folks, some great and good, some heathen and hell-bound.
Among the great, of course, is Jesus Christ, he whose birthday we just celebrated or protested, depending on one’s religious persuasion.
Katie Couric, the sawed-off little leftist nut ball who has damn near driven CBS into bankruptcy, was also born on January 7, a fact that I would just as soon forget.
In fact, I demand to see her birth certificate before ceding the point.
Other famous Capricorn folks include Muhamed Ali, World Champion boxer and Richard M. Nixon, former President of the U.S.
Nixon was a known liar and crook.
On reflection, however, his transgressions were actually quite trivial when compared to the impeachable crimes committed damn near every day by that illegal alien Marxist now holding 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue hostage.
Although I am grateful for having survived another 365 days on this dreary journey to lord knows what, the very idea of “celebrating” another GD birthday perplexes me.
With each passing birthday, one’s bodily functions deteriorate: One’s sight, hearing, energy level, brain function and libido all go wonky, or actually disappear altogether!
Life functions that one used to barely notice become major issues as the years pass. Examples are bowel movements and orgasms, which used to be taken for granted, but now prompt raucous celebration when properly executed.
Looking objectively at the past, one can see that arthritis, heart disease, impotence, and memory loss are common attributes of growing older, with the specter of Alzheimer’s always looming in the shadows.
Just why in the bloody hell would anyone celebrate getting a year closer toward any of that?
I say to hell with my birthday, except for one wish that really sums it all up: I hope to as long I want to, and want to as long as I live!
Now if I could just remember what “wanting to” is all about!
6.1.12
Obama Wonky Math Produces More Dangerous “Policy”
By John W. Lillpop
President Obama may be a gifted orator and overall brilliant mind. However, this president is NOT much of a mathematician as evidenced by his mauling of important policy matters with math that simply does not add up.
Obama’s low aptitude for numbers was immediately obvious after his inauguration in 2009 when he added $800 billion to the national debt in order to fund a “stimulus” fantasy that was promised to keep the national unemployment rate below 8%.
As of today, national unemployment stands at 8.5%, three years after Obama’s stimulus orgy failed to increase anything but the federal deficit.
In 2010, Obama made the outrageous claim that 30 million people would be added to the ranks of the insured under the Marxist scheme called ObamaCare; thereby reducing overall health care costs.
That mind-boggling claim has been pummeled by the fact that medical costs are wildly out-of-control, causing many entities to file for waivers. More than 1100 have been approved by the Obama health care dictators.
In 2011, Obama’s bonehead refusal to deal honestly with the federal deficit and spending based on real numbers has led to the downgrading of America’s AAA credit rating, and may cause even more damage in 2012.
Obama’s latest inability to deal with reality when it comes to numbers has caused him to an unilateral disarming of the U.S. military at a time when enemies in Iran, North Korea, China, Russia and elsewhere are actually expanding their military capabilities.
Obama’s wonky math holds that 500,000 troops can be cut without harming the defense of the homeland.
500,000 non-essential soldiers, Mr. President?
Why in the name of all that is good and holy did Obama not cut 500,000, or more, jobs from the EPA, IRS, Department of Education and other worthless government bureaucracies that actually work against American interests?
Obama’s latest folly should lead the American people to conclude that simple math, combined with honesty and patriotic pro-American fervor are non-negotiable requisites for anyone interested in being president!
Sorry, Mr. President, but your numbers simply do not add up!
President Obama may be a gifted orator and overall brilliant mind. However, this president is NOT much of a mathematician as evidenced by his mauling of important policy matters with math that simply does not add up.
Obama’s low aptitude for numbers was immediately obvious after his inauguration in 2009 when he added $800 billion to the national debt in order to fund a “stimulus” fantasy that was promised to keep the national unemployment rate below 8%.
As of today, national unemployment stands at 8.5%, three years after Obama’s stimulus orgy failed to increase anything but the federal deficit.
In 2010, Obama made the outrageous claim that 30 million people would be added to the ranks of the insured under the Marxist scheme called ObamaCare; thereby reducing overall health care costs.
That mind-boggling claim has been pummeled by the fact that medical costs are wildly out-of-control, causing many entities to file for waivers. More than 1100 have been approved by the Obama health care dictators.
In 2011, Obama’s bonehead refusal to deal honestly with the federal deficit and spending based on real numbers has led to the downgrading of America’s AAA credit rating, and may cause even more damage in 2012.
Obama’s latest inability to deal with reality when it comes to numbers has caused him to an unilateral disarming of the U.S. military at a time when enemies in Iran, North Korea, China, Russia and elsewhere are actually expanding their military capabilities.
Obama’s wonky math holds that 500,000 troops can be cut without harming the defense of the homeland.
500,000 non-essential soldiers, Mr. President?
Why in the name of all that is good and holy did Obama not cut 500,000, or more, jobs from the EPA, IRS, Department of Education and other worthless government bureaucracies that actually work against American interests?
Obama’s latest folly should lead the American people to conclude that simple math, combined with honesty and patriotic pro-American fervor are non-negotiable requisites for anyone interested in being president!
Sorry, Mr. President, but your numbers simply do not add up!
Let's "Reform" US Immigration Policy to Match Mexico's!
by John W. Lillpop
Mexico seems to be wallowing in "Do As I say, Not As I Do" hypocrisy when it comes to immigration laws. Successive presidents and foreign ministers of the nation have called for leniency on the part of the U.S. when it comes to Mexicans coming to America illegally across U.S. borders.
Do Mexican leaders practice what they preach when it comes to, say, an American couple seeking a cheaper, slower-paced lifestyle? Not on your tortilla!
Mexico, according to journalist and terrorist expert Dr. J. Michael Waller, has some of the strictest immigration laws of any country, and they enforce them to the letter.
A link to his commentary.
http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/waller5-8-06.html
Waller informs us that "Mexico has a radical idea for a rational immigration policy that most Americans would love. However, Mexican officials haven’t been sharing that idea with us as they press for the U.S. Congress to adopt the McCain-Kennedy immigration reform bill."
Waller adds: "That’s too bad, because Mexico, which annually deports more illegal aliens than the United States does, has much to teach us about how it handles the immigration issue.
Under Mexican law, it is a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico."
Waller sharpens his point by commenting on the unnerving tendency of some legal scholars in the U.S. to use foreign laws as a reference point for deciding issues in America.
Waller states, "At a time when the Supreme Court and many politicians seek to bring American law in line with foreign legal norms, it’s noteworthy that nobody has argued that the U.S. look at how Mexico deals with immigration and what it might teach us about how best to solve our illegal immigration problem."
And whereas U.S. laws are often cumbersome, complex instruments fathomable only to lawyers who charge upwards of $300 an hour, things are more to the point in Mexican law.
Again, quoting Waller from the referenced link: "Mexico has a single, streamlined law that ensures that foreign visitors and immigrants are:
• In Mexico legally;
• Have the means to sustain themselves economically;
• Not destined to be burdens on society;
• Of economic and social benefit to society;
• Of good character and have no criminal records; and
• Contributors to the general well being of the nation.
"The law also ensures that:
• Authorities have a record of each foreign visitor;
• Foreign visitors do not violate their visa status;
• Foreign visitors are banned from interfering in the country’s internal politics;
• Foreign visitors who enter under false pretenses are imprisoned or deported;
• Foreign visitors violating the terms of their entry are imprisoned or deported;
• Those who aid in illegal immigration will be sent to prison."
Who could disagree with such a law? It makes perfect sense," Waller states with unassailable logic.
Unfortunately, very little "perfect sense" is obvious in the ongoing debate on immigration reform here in the United States. Rather, the interests of the American people are often ignored or made subordinate by politicians from both parties.
Of greater interest to some in Washington, D.C., is feeding an insatiable corporate appetite for cheap labor, satisfying a wicked lust for cheap votes, and giving in to an inexplicable drive to promote America's decay into a third-world abyss.
These ignoble interests trump rule of law, homeland security, economic and social stability, and preservation of American language and culture in the minds of some elected officials sworn to uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution.
By contrast, Waller notes that Mexican law and officials are focused on numero uno--that being Mexico!
Waller writes, "The Mexican constitution strictly defines the rights of citizens – and the denial of many fundamental rights to non-citizens, both illegal and illegal.
"Under the constitution, the Ley General de Población, or General Law on Population spells out specifically the country’s immigration policy.
"It is an interesting law – and one that should cause us all to ask, 'Why is our southern neighbor pushing us to water down our own immigration laws and policies, when its own immigration restrictions are the toughest on the continent?'
"If a felony is a crime punishable by more than one year in prison, then Mexican law makes it a felony to be an illegal alien in Mexico.
"If the United States adopted such statutes, Mexico no doubt would denounce them as a manifestation of American racism and bigotry."
Waller supports his main thesis by citing key articles of Mexico's main
law.
Again quoting from the commentary at http://www.citizensforaconstitutionalrepublic.com/waller5-8-06.html:
"We looked at the immigration provisions of the Mexican constitution. Now let’s look at Mexico’s main immigration law.
"Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:
• Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of
contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
• Immigration officials must 'ensure' that 'immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance' and for their dependents. (Article 34)
• Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets 'the
equilibrium of the national demographics,' when foreigners are deemed
detrimental to 'economic or national interests,' when they do not behave like
good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and
when 'they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.' (Article 37)
• The Secretary of Governance may 'suspend or prohibit the admission of
foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.' (Article 38)
• Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:
• Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration
authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article
73)
• A National Population Registry keeps track of 'every single individual who
comprises the population of the country,' and verifies each individual’s identity.
(Articles 85 and 86)
• A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).
Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:
• Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article
116)
• Foreigners who sign government documents 'with a signature that is false or
different from that which he normally uses' are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)
Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:
• Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
• Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
• Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico – such as working with out a permit – can also be imprisoned.
• Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,
• A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five
thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country
illegally. (Article 123)
• Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico
instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
• Foreigners who 'attempt against national sovereignty or security' will be
deported. (Article 126)
• Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered
criminals under the law.
• A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the
foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
• Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)"
Waller summarizes his review of Mexican law with this statement: "All of the above runs contrary to what Mexican leaders are demanding of the United States. The stark contrast between Mexico’s immigration practices versus its American immigration preaching is telling. It gives a clear picture of the Mexican government’s agenda: to have a one-way immigration relationship with the United States."
Waller concludes his excellent work with a challenge that should be visited upon all 535 members of the U.S. Congress and President Bush as they consider immigration reform.
Waller's challenge:
"Let’s call Mexico’s bluff on its unwarranted interference in U.S. immigration policy.
Let’s propose, just to make a point, that the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) member nations standardize their immigration laws by using Mexico’s own law as a model."
Congratulations to J. Michael Waller.* His is a voice of sanity that needs to be heard, especially by inmates wandering the halls and cloak rooms of Capitol Hill and 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
*J. Michael Waller is vice president for Information Operations at the Center for Security Policy. A journalist and author, he brings expertise in terrorism, intelligence, the former Soviet Union, and the Americas. He previously served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of State.
5.1.12
Securing the Borders With Mexico Is Not Nearly Enough!
By John W. Lillpop
Led astray by the likes of George W. Bush, John McCain, Newt Gingrich and other damnable RINOs, the Republican Party has become a despicable source of advocates for tens of millions of illegal aliens and those opposed, in principal, to the Rule of Law.
Only Democrats like President Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, and the DNC are more anti-American in their perspectives than contemporary RINOs.
But while anarchy and lack of patriotic fervor are brand names long associated with the Democrat Party, at least the left is open and honest about their treachery: The liberal wanderlust for Hispanics of the illegal alien variety is all about votes and power.
To hell with American culture, language, and values! To those who bring a bitter hatred of all things American into the fray, whittling the Anglo-Saxon demographic down to size while installing a multicultural, non-white majority is not just acceptable: To the deluded left, it is imperative!
Republicans are even less principled: For the most part, the GOP tries to maintain a facade of Rule of Law toughness, while privately pimping out to big business, the Chamber of Commerce, and all who would profit on the backs of illiterate peasants from south of our borders.
In employing this sinister scheme, Republicans use a law and order ruse: They demand that the borders be secured before immigration reform is even considered.
This argument obscures the obvious truth: With as many as 12 million freeloading, scam-artists of Latino descent already here, securing the borders is not nearly enough!
Twelve million is a huge number!
In contrast, the total world population of Jews is about 13 million, including the good people of Israel!
There are more total illegal aliens in America than in each of the 50 states except for Texas, Illinois, California, Florida, and New York!
Repeat: In 45 of the states, the population is less than the number of illegal aliens in the U.S.!
How can any civilized society hope to survive in the light of such ignorance of law and order?
Obviously, no society can continue to prosper with such pathetic commitment to its cultural and social heritage.
The ONLY hope for America is to round up and deport even last illegal alien, all 12 million of the invading criminals.
That will not be easy—still it must be done to preserve what is left of America as the last hope for all of humanity!
http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0004986.html
1.1.12
Barack Obama's Resolutions for 2012
John W. Lillpop
President Obama has had a very rough 2011. To start with, he turned 50 in August and, by the end of the year, he looked and felt 85.
Only Muammar Gaddafi had a worse year, but at least Gaddafi no longer has to worry about broken resolutions, gun scandals or quitting (again) smoking.
Obama, on the other hand, has made his 2012 resolutions public as listed below. Included are the actions he intends to take to meet the resolutions:
* Get U.S. Troops out of Afghanistan.
Action: Order them to invade Pakistan, Uganda, and Australia.
* Avoid impeachment by a hostile Congress.
Action: Order the Marines to take over the U.S. House and Senate mail rooms with orders to destroy all mail that even looks like a subpoena.
* Avoid ridicule during the State of the Union speech.
Action: Tape it in private, send a DVD copy to John Boehner and Harry Reid.
* Terminate All "Hillary for President" talk started by Bill Clinton
Action: Order Hillary to set-up office in Syria, with further orders that she not leave the country for any purpose before November 6.
* Minimize the effectiveness of John Boehner
Action: When signing the Defense Appropriations bill, attach a Signing Statement to revoke Ohio's statehood, thereby making the Bone Head ineligible to serve in Congress.
* Ease Concerns about border security:
Action: Move southern border to Nicaragua
* Fix illegal immigration crisis.
Action: Pardon all 20 million illegal aliens now in America in time to register them as Democrats for the big election.
* End partisan battles with Republicans
Action: Use ACORN operatives to get as many illegal aliens, felons, and dead Dems to the polls in order to retain the Senate and retake the U.S. House,
and the Number 1 Resolution:
* Play More Basketball!
Good luck, President Obama!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)