27.8.10

Obama’s New Mandate: CHANGE It Back!













By John W. Lillpop

As the American Dream is systematically destroyed by Barack Obama, a Marxist community organizer with no practical experience except for seizing and wasting other people’s wealth, a counterforce of revolution is growing more and more powerful by the day.

That force is determined to counter the anti-free trade policies of the arrogant egomaniac who is occupying the White House.

The anti-Obama counter force counts includes Americans from all racial, socio-economic, and ideological persuasions. The common bond is a passion for self-determination and less government.

This new majority has embraced a three-word slogan that tells it like it is in our Obama-plagued nation:

The new mandate: CHANGE it back!

And let it be so.

Read Our Lips: NO NEW AMNESTY!











By John W. Lillpop


To Democrats and RINOs in Congress and President Obama:

We the American people understand that there are those in government who are actually giving serious thought to yet another attempt to grant amnesty to 12-38 million illegal aliens who have invaded the sovereign nation known as the United States.

With all due respect to pro-amnesty advocates, what Part of NO NEW AMNESTY do you not understand?

For the benefit of slow learners and those in denial, let us reiterate why the majority of Americans everywhere, from all political persuasions, are against amnesty for the criminals who have invaded America:

In short,the people are:

FED UP with plans to merge the United States into a North American alliance with Canada and Mexico. Such a plan would destroy American sovereignty and is totally unacceptable.

FED UP
with the refusal of the federal government to secure our borders at time of war.

FED UP when armed Mexicans illegally cross our borders and assault Americans, yet our government takes no action, and refuses to even protest.

FED UP with the fact that upwards of 38 million illegal aliens are currently in America, which costs taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars every year.

FED UP with a president who orders young Americans into harm's way thousands of miles from home, but who refuses to secure America.

FED UP with politicians who refuse to enforce immigration laws and who claim it is "impossible" to deport criminals here illegally.

FED UP with illegal aliens who can not and/or will not speak English.

FED UP with taxpayer dollars being wasted to print documents in foreign languages.

FED UP
with illegal aliens who dump their medical bills on the backs of U.S. taxpayers, but who send $30-40 billion a year back to Mexico each year.

FED UP with the fact that providing free medical services to illegal aliens drives hospitals out of business, making those facilities unavailable to American citizens for whom the medical centers were intended.

FED UP with our schools being invaded by non-English speaking children who impede the learning process of students who genuinely belong here.

FED UP with the fact that federal, state, and local penal systems are overrun by illegal aliens, again costing taxpayers billions each year.

FED UP with the fact that, on average, illegal aliens kill 12 Americans every day.

FED UP with the fact that the overwhelming majority of felony crimes being investigated in Los Angeles have been committed by illegals from Mexico.

FED UP
with politicians who refuse to round up and deport millions of illegal aliens who are destroying American culture and language.

FED UP with politicians who pamper illegal aliens with driver's licenses and free public services, which encourage even more invaders to come to America.

FED UP with the attempted Mexicanization of America. Mexico is a third- world slum, and we are FED UP with those who want America to be like Mexico!

Finally, Mr. President and members of the U.S. Congress, we are FED UP with those who consistently work on behalf of illegal aliens and the state of Mexico, and against the interests of the American people!

Please do not underestimate the dissatisfaction and rage swelling in the hearts of patriotic Americans on this vital issue.

We the people DEMAND our great country back!

Read Our Lips: NO NEW AMNESTY!

26.8.10

Why Would Any Rational American Vote for This Woman?










By John W. Lillpop


In short order, the American people will have the opportunity to register their views about the CHANGE hysteria, the depressed economy, and the gutting of America defenses at the ballot box.

Due diligence is called for on the part of voters. Neglect of this vital function could make things even worse. All voters must know the issues and the candidates before voting.

A special shout out goes to the 8th Congressional District in California. Folks there will be asked to decide the fate of a candidate who believes:


* Investigations are needed to determine the source of funding
for groups that advocate positions that she does not agree with

* Abortion is acceptable because the Catholic Fathers have
never taken a position on the issue

* Holy scripture obligates politicians to fight on behalf of invading criminals who ignore our borders and laws and who cost taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars every year

* Enforcing US Immigration laws is “un-American”

* Drug rehabilitation is a more effective means for dealing with illicit drugs than securing the borders.

* Those who do not share her views are Nazis and/or racists

The candidate with those odd, un-American beliefs is Nancy Pelosi, currently the Speaker of the U.S. House.

Isn’t it time for San Francisco to come in out of the fog long enough to retire this aging, addled menace?

Obama’s Idiotic Deadline Boosting Taliban Spirits

By John W. Lillpop


President Obama faces a vexing challenge as America’s Commander-in-Chief:

He must execute what he famously calls the “right war” in Afghanistan, but at the same time, troops must be brought home well ahead of the 2012 national elections.

Obama critics fear that in his angst to retain power, the president will seek to satisfy the politically-motivated withdrawal deadline at all costs, regardless of how the war on the ground is proceeding.

Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai has joined the chorus of cynics who sense that Obama is playing politics with the future of Afghanistan.

As reported, in part, at Reference 1:


“KABUL, Afghanistan – President Hamid Karzai said that U.S. plans to start withdrawing troops from Afghanistan next year had boosted the Taliban's spirits, while an insurgent attack killed eight Afghan police in the country's increasingly volatile north Thursday.

“Speaking to a visiting U.S. congressional delegation, President Hamid Karzai said the July withdrawal date had provided ‘morale value’ to the insurgency, the presidential office said.

“Karzai also told the head of U.S. Central Command, Gen. James Mattis, that terrorism could not be defeated without rooting out terrorist sanctuaries across the border — a likely reference to Pakistan, where the Taliban and other groups are believed to recruit fighters and base their leadership.”


Once again, Barack Obama’s actions demonstrate a brutal lack of understanding and integrity, and an obsession with power.

Remember the phrase “ugly American” which was used to describe corrupt American politicians? Barack Obama fits that moniker perfectly.

America (and the world) deserves better!


Ref: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100826/ap_on_re_as/as_afghanistan

25.8.10

Joe Biden’s Continuing Denigration of the Vice Presidency














Joe Biden’s Continuing Denigration of the Vice Presidency

By John W. Lillpop

Remember back in 2008 when left-wing pundits and naysayers were warning America that Sarah Palin as vice president would result in an intellectual melt down in the White House?

Not bright enough to be in a responsible slot they claimed. America needs more brain power in the candidate that could wind up being president.

Remember?

Well, perhaps Sarah Palin is not Mensa material, but she is one hell of a lot brighter than Joseph Biden, the gaffe-prone court jester currently making a mockery of the “Exceptional American” theory which holds that we have the best and the brightest in charge of things in America.

Biden’s latest Oops! moment came this morning when the addled VP reportedly said the following:

Biden conceded that the economic recovery was not proceeding as fast as the administration had hoped, but claimed there was ‘no doubt we're moving in the right direction.’”

This idiotic statement at a time when:

* New home sales slumped to slowest pace on record;

* Foreclosures head toward one million for 2010

* Bankruptcies at five year high

* Job losses continue with unemployment still out of control

* Federal deficit at 13 trillion and growing

This is “moving in the right direction,” Mr. Biden?

Thank goodness we have a mid-term election in which voters can diminish the influence of the Obama-Biden comedy act which, by the way, is not all that funny these days!

24.8.10

Muslims, Mosquitoes, and Mosque Mania















Satire by John W. Lillpop


Let’s face it, patriots. The tone and tenor of the debate over the Ground Zero mosque has been irretrievably poisoned ever since Christian poser President Obama came out in favor of said erection, whilst Mormon Harry Reid disagreed with his favorite light-skinned president "with no Negro dialect.”

This Mega- war among Hypocrites has spread across our nation with a vengeance, and threatens to become a major issue in the mid-term elections, just 11 weeks from now.

In fact, Mosque Mania may overtake jobs and the putrid Recovery Summer as wedge issues in November.

Hmmmm, odd that.

Whom do you suppose might have a vested interest in displacing voter focus on unemployment and the wretched economy, and replacing same with coast-to-coast, fiery debate about a non-existent mosque?

Incidentally, until recently most Americans thought that mosques were used to provide temporary housing for unemployed mosquitoes. Turns out that the insects that occupy mosques are far more dangerous.

Ever since September 11, 2001, American scholars, political scientists, historians, educators, clergy, and pundits have been engaged in a ferocious, but to date futile, search for a “Moderate Muslim.”

After a decade of relentless searching, the inescapable conclusion is: The term Moderate Muslim is the Mother of all Oxymorons!

Which brings us to one Feisal Abdul Rauf , the main imam behind the nutty idea building a mosque within a stones throw of the Twin Towers, which graced the New York skyline until 19 moderate Muslims brought it down ten years ago.

Rauf fails (woefully) the “moderate” test based in part on the following tirade as reported, in part, by Human Events at Reference 1:

“New audio has surfaced of the imam behind the controversial mosque near Ground Zero allegedly telling an audience overseas that the United States has been far more deadly than al-Qaeda.

"We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al-Qaeda has on its hands of innocent non Muslims," Feisal Abdul Rauf said at a 2005 lecture sponsored by the University of South Australia. After discussing the U.S.-led sanctions against Iraq under Saddam Hussein, Rauf went on to argue that America is to blame for its testy relationship with Islamic countries.”


By the way, this is the same "moderate" who is using your taxpayer money (at least $16,000.) in an outreach program to Muslim nations.

The bloke is working for the U.S. State Department, which he also did when George W. Bush was the head Muslim pacifier in the White House!

Feisal Abdul Rauf and other “Moderate” Muslims who favor building a mosque at Ground Zero should ponder this question:

What say ye about a Monument in Mecca to Celebrate May 14, 1948 , the Date on Which Israel Became a Nation?

Solely for the purpose of educating and reaching out, you understand?




Reference 1 http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=38673

21.8.10

Iran Goes Nuclear, Obama Goes Swimming!

















Iran Goes Nuclear, Obama Goes Swimming!

By John W. Lillpop

In a jolting reminder of just how far the American brand has fallen, the Islamic state of Iran began start-up of its first nuclear reactor, a gift from the rejuvenated “evil empire,” AKA Russia.

As reported at yahoo.news.com, in part, at reference 1:

“BUSHEHR, Iran – Trucks rumbled into Iran's first reactor Saturday to begin loading tons of uranium fuel in a long-delayed startup touted by officials as both a symbol of the country's peaceful intentions to produce nuclear energy as well as a triumph over Western pressure to rein in its nuclear ambitions.”

Thus, while the world is pushed to the brink of nuclear confrontation between Iran and Israel, America’s Marxist Muslim and part-time U.S. president is off to Martha’s Vineyard for his sixth—sixth!---vacation of the year.

Critics are pouncing all over President Obama for his “fun in the sun” excesses, particularly now that Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has nuclear power.

By the way,the notion that Iran is going nuclear only for “peaceful purposes” is so absurd that only a goofy, misguided, and na├»ve Muslim community organizer with a Marxist mind set would believe it.

Which brings us back to the world’s greatest obstacle to peace, that being Barack Hussein Obama.

Welcome to Martha Vineyards, sir?

To show their appreciation for Obama’s visit, the locals released the following good news:

Portions of Tisbury Great Pond, the salt-water lagoon fronting the first family’s vacation estate Blue Heron Farm, were closed earlier this week due to high levels of enterococci, an indicator that the water is contaminated with fecal coliform bacteria.”

Fecal coliform bacteria?

Good heavens, the president would be better off in a gulf state, on an oil-blasted beach, than the icky stuff at Martha’s Vineyard!

Still, given his disastrous approval ratings and the poor prospects for Democrats in the upcoming election, perhaps fecal coliform bacteria is what Obama deserves?



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/iran_nuclear;_ylt=AgyM23lTVqfzvYx.sg_Xwl.s0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTNjMDRvNDVnBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTAwODIxL2lyYW5fbnVjbGVhcgRjY29kZQNtb3N0cG9wdWxhcgRjcG9zAzEEcG9zAzIEcHQDaG9tZV9jb2tlBHNlYwN5bl90b3Bfc3RvcnkEc2xrA2lyYW5zdGFydHNudQ--

20.8.10

Barack Obama: Christian In Name Only (CINO)?










By John W. Lillpop

Barack Obama’s naive statements on the Ground Zero mosque have brought new energy to the debate over his religious affiliations.

Yahoonews.com reports, in part, that nearly one in five Americans believe that Obama is Muslim: Ref 1


“Nearly one in five Americans incorrectly believe President Obama is Muslim, according to a new poll from the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. That total, 18 percent, is up from 11 percent in Pew's March 2009 survey.

“While the view that Obama is Muslim is more widespread among those who identify as Obama's ideological opponents, the survey found that a growing number of independents also believe the myth, up 8 percent from 2009.”


Note that the word “incorrectly” as used in the Yahoo.news story is not necessarily true.

Consider Obama’s actions since 1/20/09:

* Immediately called for shut down of GITMO

* Called for terrorists to be tried by civilian juries, rather than military, including Miranda rights and other rights conferred on citizens.

* Once in office, rushed off to a Muslim nation to deliver a speech in which he declared that America is “not” a Christian nation.

* Changed policy toward Israel such that that nation is treated like a gang of terrorists.

* Supports, or at least does not oppose, the mosque at Ground Zero.

In defending the president, White House spokesman Bill Burton made the following comments aboard Air Force One:

“The president is obviously - he's Christian. He prays every day..." But, Burton added, the president's top priority is not "making sure Americans know what a devout Christian he is."

Excuse me? Prayer does not make one a Christian.

For instance Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad surely prays many times a day. As did Mohamed Atta and the other 18 devils who brought the Twin Towers down.

The issue is to whom does he pray and does he believe in the divinity of Jesus Christ, the resurrection?

Or is Barack Obama a Christian In Name Only?


Ref 1: http://news.yahoo.com/s/yblog_upshot/20100819/pl_yblog_upshot/poll-a-growing-number-of-americans-believe-obama-is-muslim

17.8.10

Obama: He’s Not Done Yet!

Satire by John W. Lillpop

In some ways, the daily foibles of Barack Obama bring back memories of a somewhat gross, but still funny, story a friend told about an experience had had whilst in New York City years ago.

This chap boarded a bus headed to Yankee Stadium one afternoon and, upon taking his seat, became aware of an particularly unpleasant aroma coming from the older, disheveled gentleman seated directly in front of him.

In blunt terms, it smelled as though the bloke had soiled his pants!

Now wishing to be intrusive, but yet seeking relief from the odor, my friend gently tapped the fellow on the shoulder and meekly asked, “Hey, buddy. Did you mess your pants?”

To which the smelly bloke angrily replied, “It’s none of your damn business-- but, yes, as a matter of fact, I did!”

My friend then asked, “Well, why in the hell don’t you change your clothes?”

To which smelly replied, “’Cause I’m not done yet!”

When you really get down to it, is that not where we our with our feeble president?

He refuses to CHANGE when it really matters!

Ready For “Mecca” Time?















Satire by John W. Lillpop



Greenwich median time has unnecessarily enslaved billons of people around the world, especially Muslims, for far too long.

GOOD NEWS: Religion of Peace warriors are about to correct this wretched abuse with the proliferation of “Mecca Time.”

As reported, in part, at Reference 1:

“MECCA, Saudi Arabia (AFP) – Muslims around the world could be setting their watches to a new time soon when the world's largest clock begins ticking atop a soaring skyscraper in Islam's holiest city of Mecca.

“Saudi Arabia hopes the four faces of the new clock, which will loom over Mecca's Grand Mosque from what is expected to be the world's second tallest building, will establish Mecca as an alternate time standard to the Greenwich median.

The clock is targeted to enter service with a three-month trial period in the first week of the holy month of Ramadan on or about August 12, according to the Saudi state news agency SPA.

It boasts four glimmering 46 metre-across (151 feet) faces of high-tech composite tiles, some laced with gold, sitting more than 400 metres (1,320 feet) over the Holy Haram compound.

"Everyone is interested to see the clock, despite the lack of sufficient information about it, and its mechanism," said Mecca resident Hani al-Wajeeh.

"We in Mecca hope to be the world's central time zone, and not just have a clock to look at, to show off," he said”


OK, red-neck Americans, lose that Islamophobia and get with the new way! Its all about being on ASD,—that’s Allah Standard Time, mates!

It’s not that difficult, really.

Just set your clocks back to 750 AD so as to be in synch with Muslim culture and thinking!

Oh, and Happy Ramadan!


Reference 1:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20100810/wl_mideast_afp/saudireligionmeccaconstructiontime

16.8.10

Guess Who Is Suddenly "Concerned" About Constitution?












By John W. Lillpop

After his endorsement of a mosque at Ground Zero created an awful kerfuffel that has Democrats racing for cover right before mid-term elections, President Obama has retreated behind the protective cover of the U.S. Constitution.

Barack Obama and the Constitution?

Is it not the highest form of blasphemy just to mention this president’s name in the same sentence as the U.S. Constitution?

After all, he has waged all-out war on that document since invading the Oval Office on January 20, 2009.

As reported at Yahoonews.com, in part:

“BOARD AIR FORCE ONE – A White House spokesman says politics wasn't a factor in President Barack Obama's remarks about building a mosque near the site of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in New York City.

Deputy White House press secretary Bill Burton said it was "not politics" but Obama's feeling that he had the obligation as president to "make sure people are treated equally" under the Constitution.”


If Obama really gave a tinker’s dam about the Constitution, he would scrap his outrageous law suit against the state of Arizona for protecting its citizens from invaders.

He would move to scrap ObamaCare, which was rammed down the throats of unwilling Americans with legislative sleight of hands and bribery when the votes were not there to follow the rules.

He would understand that forcing citizens to purchase health care insurance, or face the ravages of the IRS, is barbaric and unconstitutional.

He would understand that the Constitution is very specific when it comes to the eligibility of any person to serve as president. Thus, he would make every effort to be completely honest and transparent with the American people concerning questions about his own eligibility.

He would understand that the Constitution sets forth provisions for separation of powers, meant to assure that the Executive Branch is accountable to the people through the oversight function performed by Congress.

He would understand that installation of stealth Czars in order to circumvent Congressional oversight is a repudiation of the Constitution.

He would understand that voter intimidation by the New Black Panther Party is not acceptable simply because the intimidated are not people of color.

He would understand that actions taken to grant rights reserved for citizens to terrorists are anti-American acts of treason.

He would understand that the Constitution requires the president to secure our borders and enforce our immigration laws so as to protect the American people.

He would understand that it is the president’s Constitutional obligation to serve as America’s Commander-in-Chief, which requires him to use war powers prudently to defend the American people, rather than using those powers as political footballs.

Above all else, if he were genuine, President Obama would understand that the will of the people should be the first priority for any political entity wishing to govern, and that that applies to taxes, illegal invasions, health care, terrorists, and all major issues of the day.

Barack Obama concerned about the Constitution?

Oh, really, don’t be silly!

15.8.10

Mosque at Ground Zero Would Be Recruiting Tool for Al-Quaeda

















By John W. Lillpop


In his haste to endorse a Muslim mosque next to ground zero, President Obama overlooked a major objection to the proposed construction:

Namely, a mosque at ground zero would be a tremendous recruiting tool for Al-Quaeda.

Imagine the Osama bin Laden sales pitch to young, Jihad-aspiring Muslims:

“The devil (America) can be defeated, Allah willing.

“He has made possible the construction of a Holy place of worship at the very site where 19 of our most courageous and dedicated Brothers brought down structures built by and for Zionist pigs.

“Allah made it possible to build a monument to Mohamed Atta and the other 18 warriors for Islam before the infidels could even complete their plans to rebuild the destroyed Twin Towers.

“The devil can be defeated, Allah willing.”


Furthermore, President Obama simply does not seem to appreciate the fact that the mosque would create significant anti-Muslim sentiments with the potential to poison relationships between Muslims and non-Muslims in America.

All in all, the very idea of planting a mosque at Ground Zero is a completely stupid idea, which is why Obama is 100% for it.

Barack Obama is a clueless and classless neophyte and ego maniac who is simply the wrong man for the presidency.

Which is why this November voters must kick Democrats out of the U.S. Congress.












America needs a congress comprised of patriotic men and women dedicated to the best interests of our blessed nation and heritage. A congress that will stand up to and stop President Obama who on so many issues who seems dedicated to the destruction of our values and America itself.

12.8.10

Harry Reid, Great Friend of Hispanics? Including Scam Artists and Freeloaders?













By John W. Lillpop



Harry Reid’s advancing dementia became quite obvious recently when he used the Race card in a feeble attempt to paint all Republicans as anti-Hispanic bigots.

As reported at alternet.com, in part, Harry’s words of wisdom were:

"I don't know how anyone of Hispanic heritage could be a Republican, OK," said the ranking Democrat at a campaign event with Latino supporters earlier this week. "Do I need to say more?"

Actually, Harry, you did say quite a lot more on the floor of the U.S. Senate when you declared that illegal aliens (90% Hispanic) are scam artists and free loaders.

Surely you remember this classless diatribe from just few years ago?

Your office released the following statements (in bold) concerning illegal immigration:

“In response to increased terrorism and abuse of social programs by aliens, (I) today introduced the first and only comprehensive immigration reform bill in Congress. Currently, an alien living illegally in the United States often pays no taxes but receives unemployment, welfare, free medical care, and other federal benefits. Recent terrorist acts, including the World Trade Center bombing, have underscored the need to keep violent criminals out of the country.”

Your bill, Senator Reid, titled the “Immigration Stabilization Act,” would overhaul the nation's immigration laws, and calls for a massive scale-down of immigrants allowed into the country. The bill also changes asylum laws to prevent phony asylum seekers.

The senator said the U.S. open door policy is being abused at the expense of honest, working citizens.

The senator continued:

"We are a country founded upon fairness and justice. An individual in real threat of torture or long-term incarceration because of his or her political beliefs can still seek asylum. But this bill closes the door to those who want to abuse America's inherent generosity and legal system.”

"Our borders have overflowed with illegal immigrants placing tremendous burdens on our criminal justice system, schools and social programs. The Immigration and Naturalization Service needs the ability to step up enforcement. Our federal wallet is stretched to the limit by illegal aliens getting welfare, food stamps, medical care, and other benefits often without paying any taxes.”

“Safeguards like welfare and free medical care are in place to boost Americans in need of short-term assistance. These programs were not meant to entice freeloaders and scam artists from around the world. Even worse, Americans have seen heinous crimes committed by individuals who are here illegally.”


Specific provisions proposed by the senator in the Immigration Stabilization Act include:

* Reduces annual legal immigration levels. Relatives other than spouse or minor children admitted only if already on immigration waiting lists and their admission does not raise annual immigration levels above approved level.

* Reforms asylum rules to prevent aliens from entering the United States illegally under phony "asylum" claims.

* Expands list of felonies considered "aggravated" felonies requiring exclusion and deportation of criminal aliens. Allows courts to order deportation at time of sentencing.

* Increases penalties for failing to depart or re-entering the United States after a final order of deportation order. Increases maximum penalties for visa fraud from five years to 10 years.

* Curtails alien smuggling by authorizing interdiction and repatriation of aliens seeking to enter the United States unlawfully by sea. Increases penalties for alien smuggling.

* Adds "alien smuggling" to the list of crimes subject to sanctions under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

* Expands the categories of property that are forfeited when used to facilitate the smuggling or harboring of illegal aliens.

* Clarifies that a person born in the United States to an alien mother who is not a lawful resident is not a U.S. citizen. This will eliminate incentive for pregnant alien women to enter the United States illegally, often at risk to mother and child, for the purpose of acquiring citizenship for the child and accompanying federal financial benefits.

* Mandates that aliens who cannot demonstrably support themselves without public or private assistance are excludable. This will prevent admission of aliens likely to be dependent on public financial support. This requirement extends to the sponsor of any family sponsored immigrant.

* Increases border security and patrol officer positions.
"


For the record, Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced the Immigration Stabilization Act in the United States Senate in 1993. The statements quoted above are from a press release issued by Reid’s office on August 5, 1993.

In view of Reid’s anti-immigrant stance, the proper question is: How can any Hispanic be a supporter of Harry Reid?



Source: http://levin.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjJmNzE3MTg5MDJhYzM4OTM5OGMwOGM5ZTNhYzJlYmE

11.8.10

More Obama Lunacy: Steals from Hungry to Reward Unions!

By John W. Lillpop

Barack Obama has fostered the notion that he is the Robin Hood of modern politics, the savior who will steal from the Haves to bolster the Have-nots.

However, in his haste to shore up support from unionized workers for the looming elections, President Obama has gotten his communist signals crossed. In the latest Obama gaffe, he is stealing from the hungry to payoff union allies.

As reported, in part, at FoxNews.com:

“Some Democrats are upset and advocacy groups are outraged over the raiding of the food-stamp cupboard to fund a state-aid bailout that some call a gift to teachers and government union workers.

“House members convened Tuesday and passed the multibillion-dollar bailout bill for cash-strapped states that provides $10 billion to school districts to rehire laid-off teachers or ensure that more teachers won't be let go before the new school year begins, keeping more than 160,000 teachers on the job, the Obama administration says.

“But the bill also requires that $12 billion be stripped from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps, to help fund the new bill, prompting some Democrats to cringe at the notion of cutting back on one necessity to pay for another. The federal assistance program currently helps 41 million Americans.”

Atta girl, Nancy Pelos1!

Perhaps the president should be “tested for drugs,” Robert Gibbs?

10.8.10

Global Warming? Not In SF Bay Area!












By John W. Lillpop

Just who in the hell is kidding who about global warming?

On August 9th, the San Francisco Giants hosted the Chicago Cubs at the AT&T yard in China Basin. At game time, the temperature was a torrid 60 degrees.

Sixty whole degrees on the 9th day of Freaking August, for heavens sake!

Quite a shock from the debilitating heat and humidity that the Giants faced in Atlanta, Georgia over the week end. Conditions there had Giants' broadcasters openly yearning for fog and cold!

Yes, it is true that the weather in the Bay Area is more moderate then elsewhere in America. And yes,weather is the only moderate thing about this liberal-infested community.

Still, 60 degrees is a damn crime.

About two fortnights ago, San Jose experienced our only “heat wave” of the year.

It was hell in paradise as we suffered through four days in which the thermometer scaled to 95 at the top, only to drop like a rock to 60 or 70 degrees at night.

Perfect for sleeping, though, once the sun got the hell out of the way.

Yes, it is true that September is usually our warmest month. However, it is also true that, to date, this is the coolest summer anyone can remember.

After buying a portable AC during the heat wave to keep my bedroom comfortable, I have since resuscitated that heavy blanket from storage in order to fight off the evening and morning chills.

That pitcher I bought for iced tea is for lease or sale; five pounds of free ice included!

Meanwhile, the dim wits at our electric utility company are issuing an urgent message: Electricity rates to skyrocket in September!

How can this be? Its as though that huge chunk of ice that separated from the glacier has landed in downtown San Jose and they want to INCREASE my electric rates?

The official explanation: Sharply reduced usage has led to reduced profits for the energy moguls. A rate increase is needed for balance!

Balance? Like, who in bloody hell needs "balance" ?

8.8.10

What If Illegal Aliens Were Deported?









Satire, By John W. Lillpop


Small thinkers like Barack Obama, and nearly all Democrats continue to perpetuate the outrageous myth that America cannot deport upwards of 38 million illegal aliens.

To which sane patriots immediately demand: Why the Hades not?

After all, each and every one of the interlopers came here one at a time; let us send them home the same way!

To facilitate that process, the list below provides a partial rendering of the goodies that would come our way if deportations started in earnest this afternoon:


*Emergency rooms would be used to treat medical emergencies, instead of being day care centers for freeloading foreign parasites;

*California would again be a blue state. Perhaps, in time, the Golden State might even be a safe haven for flying the American flag and other "jingoistic" excesses;

*Leaf blowers and Se Hablo Espanol signs would go the way of analog televisions and pay phones;

*Food like nachos, tacos, and burritos would be imported treats, rather than being hawked on every street corner by non-English speaking hawkers;

*Obesity would decline sharply as sedentary Americans would be forced to mow their own lawns, clean their own homes, and wash their own cars;

*San Francisco's population would be reduced to a few thousand gay activists, a mentally and morally retarded Board of Supervisors, and a mayor with a promising future in gay porn, but absolutely no future in politics or law;

*America's inmate population would plunge 30 percent, forcing federal, state, and local authorities to close hundreds of prisons and jails, saving taxpayers hundreds of billions each year;

*Welcome to America! would replace subversive "Press 1 for English" recorded messages;

*Demand for bilingual teachers would decline to the same level as for typewriter and VCR repair technicians;

*Unemployed and unemployable ACLU attorneys would be forced to flip burgers and scoop fries at McDonald's just to survive. Justice at last!;

*The Catholic Church would revert to being a "sanctuary pew" for gay priests, pedophiles in training, and poor white trailer trash too hooked on cigarettes and booze to be Mormons;

*Fast food restaurants would no longer exist, forcing Americans to feast on tofu and celery, thereby putting hundreds of cardiac surgeons out of work;

*Instead of a huge budget deficit, California would have an obscene surplus--taxes would be cut 20 percent;

*Welfare fraud and ID theft would no longer be considered as major crimes in those FBI statistics reports;

*Antonio Villagarosa would be picking avocados in Salinas rather than destroying the once great city of Los Angeles as it's Mayor;

*Both chambers of the US Congress would still be controlled by Republicans, rather than being in the hands of the enemy;

*W.Bush would be forced to learn proper English, rather than relying on illegal aliens to make him sound good by comparison!

*Freeing poor illegal aliens from "Living in the Shadows of American society" would no longer be the rallying cry for millions of Marxist wusses intent on destroying our great nation!

What do you think?

Bueno?




John W. Lillpop

War Losses and Economic Misery No Distraction to Elitist FLOUS















By John W. Lillpop

There has been a spate of awful news recently about the war in Afghanistan and about the U.S. economy and the hijacked “Recovery Summer.”

In Obama’s “right war” in Afghanistan, July was the deadliest month in terms of American deaths since the battle was enjoined ten years ago.

A recent ambush of medical providers there claimed several more American lives in a heart breaking reminder that sometimes brutal force is the only fair and reasonable way in which to wage war.

Yet, we hear nothing from the dithering president, except his nauseating and stupid crowing about how his leadership saved the day in Iraq.

That spin is unbelievably dumb for one who hails himself as intellectually gifted.

On the economic front, another 170,000 jobs were lost in July, despite Obama’s blathering about the “Recovery Summer.”

In fact, as reported at reference 1, in part:


“The Federal Reserve is set to downgrade its assessment of US economic prospects when it meets on Tuesday to discuss ways to reboot the flagging recovery.”

That makes it the “Flagging Recovery Summer,” does it not Mr. President?

Meanwhile, while Mr. Obama works 24/7 to foul up America even more, the elitist First Lady, Michelle Obama, is living it up in Spain at a cost of $75,000 a day!

Wow, $75,000 a day would fund one heck of a lot of unemployment checks for the president’s constituency, Michelle!

Why not let the Obama impostors pay for the Spain extravaganza, including the associated Secret Service coverage, out of the Obama’ personal checking account?

Its called “Spreading the Wealth,” Michelle, a communist catch-phrase coined by a Marxist candidate with whom you are quite well acquainted.

In 2008, Spreading the Wealth was all the rage, but as they say, “BS talks, money walks” and it turns out that that Marxist candidate was talking about spreading YOUR wealth, not his or that of his clueless FLOTUS.

Men and women dying on the battlefield, Americans facing financial ruin at home, and Michelle Obama wastes $75,000 a day of taxpayer money?

Surprised? What the hell did you expect from an anti-American elitist couple like the Obamas?

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/dedcb986-a316-11df-8cf4-00144feabdc0.html

7.8.10

Beware the Dangers of “Good" Credit"!












By John W. Lillpop


As Barack Obama and the Democrats continue to spend, spend, and spend, a Day of Reckoning looms for the American people, and it is not pretty.

Take the example of a friend who is paying the price for having good credit.

Steve Evens enjoyed a modest income, good credit, and a history of being responsible and prudent in his personal finances. Life had dealt him a pretty good hand, which he enhanced with hard work and restraint.

Until, that is, Steve became trapped in the Catch-22 of credit card mania.

It started with the zero-percent financing and other attractive offers, unsolicited, from credit card companies. The offers almost promised free money, which Steve knew was pure folly, but the offers were just too good to resist.

Steve signed up for a card and then another, both bearing very attractive terms. Both had quite manageable credit limits; besides, Steve intended to pay off all balances immediately.

Then the addictive nature of credit card mania hit Steve between the eyes. Needing a new suit of clothing for his professional work, Steve decided to see what was on sale at that fashionable, but pricey, men’s store in the upper-end mall.

Normally, Steve would spend no more than $300. for a suit. That would get him a modest, entirely appropriate business suit.

However, when Steve visited that up-scale clothier, he soon discovered that $300 would get him a couple of nice dress shirts and matching ties. No $300 suit there!

In fact, a suit at that up-scale clothier would cost Steve about $1,200.

Irrational rationalization took over: Steve reasoned that this suit could help him earn that coveted promotion and a larger salary; however, Steve did not have $1,200. available to spend.

Well, he did have $1,200, but that was supposed to be for his retirement which was a mere 35 years off. Best not to touch that account.

Besides, Steve had never paid cash for such an extravagant item in his life. Paying that much in cash left him with a queasy feeling in his stomach.

The solution: Use the V card! The interest rate was 0%, and he would pay the balance immediately. Or almost immediately.

Another wave of Irrational rationalization invaded his logic: Why stress out to pay off that no-interest balance? That, he told himself, made no sense whatsoever.

At that point, Steve had unwittingly taken the first fatal step toward financial ruin.

He had abandoned his natural inclination to be modest and prudent by purchasing goods and services which he could not afford.

By using a credit card, he avoided the pain of handing $1,200 over to a sales clerk.

Plastic does not hurt, until the credit card company converts it to paper in the form of a monthly statement.

Steve’s new thinking continued to do him great disservice over the next few years as he continued to eat, drink and be merry with reckless abandon. Restraint was replaced with “CHARGE IT!” in Steve’s vulnerable state.

Financial shock and awe soon arrived when Steve was notified that the 0% interest rate promotion on his cards had expired and his account balances were now subject to a 15-18% APR.

That was just the beginning of Steve’s woes.

More shock and awe followed months later as Steve continued to “CHARGE IT!” and was now charging groceries at the local supermarket.

Using a credit card was the only way Steve could manage to buy New York steak instead of Top Sirloin. But, he reasoned, he deserved to eat well.

When the financial crash of 2008 hit, Steve discovered to his dismay, that his credit card limits, which had gradually increased over the years, were now being sliced back by the credit card moguls.

Steve’s interest rates were also raised above 20%, which of course, raised his monthly payments, which also reduced his available credit.

The final awakening came when Steve went to buy a new car from a dealer that offered 0% interest for people with “excellent” credit. Steve counted himself as one who had unmatched credit.

To his amazement, Steve was told that he did not qualify for 0% interest because his credit was not good enough!

What the hell, he shouted! His credit was unblemished—no late payments, no defaults, no tax liens, no derogatory items. Surely, there was a monster mistake.

Steve left the dealership in his old station wagon and headed to his bank in pursuit of a consultation with a credit professional.

The great awakening soon followed. Steve learned that his credit score, despite no missed or late payments, had fallen sharply due to the following:

Steve had too many accounts where his balance was 65% or more of his credit limit! Forget the unblemished record, Steve was being kicked in the groin for using his credit too much!

In fact, because of his extravagance, Steve’s INTEREST payment on some accounts damn near consumed all of the required monthly payment.

Get that? Steve’s V account, with a balance of $8,200, was being hit with a monthly INTEREST charge of $130 a month, which took the lion’s share of his required $156 payment!

Oh, the pain! You write a check for $156 and the principle on your account goes down by $26.

As the new statements now disclose, at that rate it would take Steve 33 years to retire the debt, PROVIDED he discontinued using the credit card from this point forward.

Steve was truly caught in the Catch-22 of debtor hell.

The burning question: How long before Barack Obama and the lunatics on the left lead America to a similar fate?

6.8.10

What If Prop. 8 Had Been Upheld by an Evangelical Christian?

By John W. Lillpop



In unilaterally overturning Proposition 8, Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker nullified the vote of 7 million Californians AND the California Supreme Court which upheld the proposition by a 6-1 margin in May of 2009.

Much ado over 14 words that simply provide a definition of marriage in California .

Prop. 8 states:

"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California ."

Those simple words riled Judge Vaughn Walker, allegedly because of “constitutionality” concerns.

Incidentally, Judge Walker is openly gay, but claims that his sexual orientation is irrelevant. Leftists agree completely and scoff at the notion Judge Walker’s personal life might impact his judicial perspective.

Hmmmm. Very interesting, that.

However, does that argument pass the “smell test” of common sense and logic?

For instance what if Judge Walker had upheld Proposition 8? What if Walker was a straight, right-leaning, evangelical Christian?

Or a Mormon?

The howls and calls for revolution from the Left would be palpable. The Judge’s home would picketed by protestors looking to remove his bigoted and hateful self.

Why then is it acceptable for a gay man to issue a ruling favorable to the gay community on a matter of great importance to society, including the non-gay populace?

5.8.10

What If Japan Had Developed the Atomic Bomb Before America?

















By John W. Lillpop

There he goes again.

Never missing an opportunity to apologize for, or demean, America, President Barack Obama has decided to send an envoy to commemorate the dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima 65 years ago tomorrow, August 6.

As reported at Breitbart.com, in part:

“Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday that US President Barack Obama "thought it appropriate" to recognize Japan's atomic bomb anniversary as he wants to rid the world of nuclear arms.

“The United States, 65 years after a mushroom cloud rose over Hiroshima, will for the first time send an envoy this Friday to commemorate the bombing that rang in the nuclear age.

"President Obama is very committed to working toward a world without nuclear weapons," even if he sees it as a "long-term goal," Clinton told reporters when asked for comment on the anniversary.


"I think that the Obama administration and President Obama himself believe that it would be appropriate for us to recognize this anniversary and has proceeded to do so," she said.”

Like Osama bin Laden, that other world famous anti-American Muslim lunatic,Obama sees all issues through his “I hate America” eyes.

A question for the president seems appropriate: If the nation of Japan had won the race to develop the A-bomb, would the Japanese have refused to use the weapon against America out of humanitarian concern?

Would Emperor Hirohito have chosen to lose the war if necessary in order to avoid using the bomb on America?

Of course the question is silly. But it serves to point out the childish perspective of our community organizer who has no business being Commander-in-Chief.

New “Poll Tax” on Mainstream Voters: Judicial Activism

By John W. Lillpop


One of the great evils from America’s past was the use of poll taxes, literacy tests, and other chicanery designed to deny the vote to minorities.

For the most part, those evils have been eliminated, which is generally a good thing, although there are exceptions.

Unfortunately, America’s judiciary is employing an even more sinister method to nullify the wishes of voters and their representatives , with mainstream Americans targeted as the victims.

The new “Poll Tax” works like this: Rather than trying to prevent anyone from voting, everyone is allowed to vote and, when the results are not favorable to “Progressive” elitists, an appeal is filed.

An activist judge will then toss out the initiative, proposition, or whatever the offending vote is called, and do so by declaring the whole mess “unconstitutional.”

An excellent example of the abuse of judicial power is playing out with regard to Proposition 8 passed in 2008 by California voters and which consists of the following 14 words:

"Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

Period.

Just 14 words that express how the majority in a free and Democratic society feel about a major social and moral issue.

Just 14 words that confirm the teachings of most who adhere to Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Christianity.

Just 14 words that reflect a social and moral standard observed by most civilized societies throughout human history.

Proposition 8 was appealed to the California Supreme Court and, on May 27, 2009, the court upheld the proposition, as reported, in part, by the Los Angeles Times:

“SAN FRANCISCO — The California Supreme Court's decision May 27 to uphold Proposition 8 and existing same-sex marriages left in place all rights for California's gays and lesbians except access to the label "marriage," but it provided little protection from future ballot measures that could cost gays and other minorities more rights, lawyers and scholars said Tuesday.

“In a 6-1 ruling, the court said the November ballot measure that restored a ban on same-sex marriage was a limited constitutional amendment, not a wholesale revision that would have required a two-thirds vote of the Legislature to be placed before voters.”


Thus, those 14 words---“Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California"---had been approved by a majority of California voters AND sanctioned by the highest legal authority in the state.

But, of course, that was hardly the end of this issue.

Indeed, on August 4, 2010, Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker ruled against the people of California and the Sate Supreme Court by ruling that Proposition 8 is unconstitutional.

Limiting marriage to a union between one man and one woman is unconstitutional? What in the name of hell is happening to our society?

In all fairness, this controversial ruling cannot be laid at the feet of an out-of-control liberal president.

Judge Vaughn Walker, you see, was appointed by President George H. Bush, AKA, Bush-41, a Republican with liberal tendencies.

According to Judge Walker, the issue is all about civil rights and equality. However, the judge did not elaborate on how Proposition 8 denied gays and lesbians their rights.

If Proposition were left intact, Judge Walker, would gays and lesbians:

Be forbidden from exercising 1st Amendment free speech rights?

Be denied their 2nd Amendment rights to keep and bear arms?

Be forced to quarter troops, in violation of the 3rd Amendment?

Be subjected to unreasonable search and seizure, in violation of the 4th Amendment?

Be denied protections against self-incrimination, double jeopardy, and due process as set forth in the 5th Amendment?

Be unable to receive a speedy trial and right to counsel as guaranteed by the 6th Amendment?

Be denied a jury trial as provided for by the 7th Amendment?

Be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the 8th Amendment?

Be denied other rights not specially addressed in the Constitution as provided for in the 9th Amendment?

Be denied power of the states and people as found in the 10th Amendment?

Beyond the original 10 Bill of Rights, would upholding Proposition 8 deny homosexuals the right to be free from slavery (Amendment 13), racial suffrage (Amendment 15), gender suffrage (Amendment 19), poll taxes (Amendment 24), or right to vote at age 18 (Amendment 26)?

In addition, will they:

No longer be free to live where they wish and with whom they wish?

No longer be protected against discrimination in education, housing, or employment?

Be denied driver's licenses?

Be unable to enter same sex unions?

Be prohibited from attending the church or religious service of their choice?

Be restricted from moving about freely, unable to cross-state borders when and where they wish?

In the final analysis, the same-sex marriage debate seems not to be at all about civil rights; rather, it seems to be about whether or not society should be forced to accept homosexual values and morals as mainstream and normal.

Even in its opposition to homosexuality, society does not seem willing to deny any person his or her basic civil rights because of sexual orientation.

Bottom line: How can the same sex marriage be marketed and adjudicated as a "civil rights" issue when no fundamental rights are even remotely threatened?

4.8.10

Barack Obama: 49 Going on 12




















By John W. Lillpop



President Obama, once adored by the unwashed masses as The Omnipotent One, is now known as The Impotent One.

Things have gotten so bad for Obama that voters are no longer hesitant about challenging the president, even on his birthday which is August 4.

This year’s birthday message to Obama comes from the great state of Missouri where the people sent our fascist poser a message that roughly translates to, “Get stuffed—sir!”

At issue was ObamaCare, Democrats’ attempt to take health care out of the hands of individual citizens and deliver it as another part of life that is dictated by the government.

And why not? What with the great successes of the federal government in managing Social Security, Medicare, the federal deficit, unemployment, and other issues of great importance, why not include health care as an issue that government controls?

However, the people of Missouri beg to differ as reported at Yahoo.com, in part:

“WASHINGTON – Missouri voters' overwhelming opposition to requiring nearly all Americans to buy health insurance puts one of the least popular parts of President Barack Obama's health care overhaul law back in the political crosshairs.

“Even if the vote sets no legally binding precedent, it will help mobilize foes of Obama's agenda in the fall midterm elections, and that could make a difference in some states with close congressional races that could decide the balance of power in Washington.

“On Tuesday, Missouri voters cast 71 percent of their ballots in favor of a state measure to bar the government from requiring people to carry health insurance, and penalizing those who don't.”


Seventy one percent, Mr. President! Who would have imagined that there were that many right-wing racists in Missouri, sir?

In any event, Happy 49th!



http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100804/ap_on_el_ge/us_health_overhaul_insurance_mandate

3.8.10

What Will America Look Like on November 3, 2010?

John W. Lillpop


When we the people awaken on the morning of November 3, 2010, just three months hence, what will the political landscape of our nation look like? Will the future look brighter?

Will we the people:

*Have enacted positive CHANGE, away from the Marxist ideology of Barack Obama and the Democrat-controlled Congress?

*Have said NO! to reckless and irresponsible spending, higher taxes, higher deficits, higher unemployment, and pathetic economic growth brought on by Obamanomics?

*Have said NO! to an ill-conceived “stimulus” program that wasted a trillion dollars of U.S. wealth while stimulating nothing?

*Have said NO! to an administration that forces Marxist programs like ObamaCare down the throats of an unwilling American people?

*Have said NO! to the most corrupt U.S. House of Representatives in recent memory?

*Have said NO! to the lack of oversight and checks and balances brought on by single-party rule?

*Have said NO! to an administration that sued a sovereign U.S. state for defending American citizens against invading, foreign criminals, but which refuses to prosecute those guilty of voter intimidation?

*Have said NO! to 40 or so “czars” appointed by the president to avoid Congressional confirmation?

*Have said NO! to an inexperienced, unqualified anti-American community organizer whose policies are at odds with the majority of American citizens?


November 2, 2010: Our chance to say NO! to Democrats no longer deserving of the public trust!

2.8.10

Corruption’s New Look in Pelosi’s House: Violating Ethics While Black!















By John W. Lillpop


Not so very long ago, a popular refrain by African-Americans was to complain of being targeted by police while operating an automobile.

The catch phrase was DWB, or Driving While Black.

DWB has been replaced, at least in Nancy Pelosi’s Corrupt House, by a new catch phrase: VEWB, or Violating Ethics While Black.

Although not specifically committed to writing anywhere, it appears that the VEWB is an exclusive, open –to- black –Democrats- only institution.

Past members in good standing include William Jefferson and Cynthia McKinney.

Add to VEWB’s growing ranks the name of Maxine Watters, she of California.

As reported, in part, at Yahoo.com:

“WASHINGTON – California Democrat Maxine Waters faces a House trial this fall on three charges of ethical wrongdoing, setting the stage for a second election-season public airing of ethics problems for a longtime Democratic lawmaker.

“The charges focus on whether Waters broke the rules in requesting federal help for a bank where her husband owned stock and had served on the board of directors. She denied the charges Monday.”


Ms. Waters joins Charles Rangel as the most recent inductee (involuntary) to the muck and grime of VEMB.

Although Barack Obama is not a member of the U.S. House, he is nonetheless qualified by deed and word for membership in VEWB.

Perhaps the president’s story will be told in a Bill of Impeachment--soon?


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100802/ap_on_go_co/us_waters_ethics

Is “Immigration Enforcement” Really Un-American?















By John W. Lillpop


Mention “immigration enforcement” these days and damn near every Hispanic in the nation, both those here legally and others not, goes into life-threatening cardiac arrest.

It’s the new-age equivalent of the N word, but reserved exclusively for Latinos. Regrettably, most Democrats and the entire mainstream media support the idiotic notion that the rule of law applies to everyone but Latinos!

Speaker Nancy Pelosi even went so far as to label immigration enforcement against illegal aliens “un-American.”

How might the Founding Fathers feel knowing that more than 234 years after they fought a brutal Revolutionary war and labored long and hard to establish “a more perfect union,” the Speaker of the House of Representatives would actually see fit to defend foreign invaders against enforcement of U.S. law, and would even seek to justify such chicanery by claiming that enforcing the law was somehow un-American?

Throw in the fact that Pelosi is a dingy female with all the intellectual acumen of a stale tortilla chip and one could deliver a devastatingly bad hair day to Messrs. Jefferson, Washington, Franklin, and all of our other blessed ancestors, were they still alive to witness the dumbing-down that has consumed what was once the great and noble city of Washington, D.C.

Un-American?

There is nothing more so than voting for someone as goofy as Nancy Pelosi to a position of responsibility in the U.S. Congress!