Economic Meltdown: "Great Opportunity" to Fix Illegal Alien Crisis!

By John W. Lillpop

In their rush to dole out a trillion dollars to fund liberal pet projects in the name of stimulating the battered economy, the Democrat-controlled Congress and President Obama failed to address a major domestic crisis that threatens America's homeland security, social order, and cultural heritage, and which costs taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars each year.

The issue is the unchecked invasion of our sovereign land by scores of millions of illegal aliens, mostly from the failed state of Mexico.

Ironically, many of the concerns voiced by liberals could be mitigated, at least partially, by aggressively working to solve the illegal aliens mess.

Concerned about education and overcrowded class rooms?

Removing 12-38 million invaders would reduce class sizes dramatically, and improve the quality of instruction by weeding out illegals unable to keep up because of language and cultural barriers.

Concerned about overcrowded prisons and jails and the need to spend hundreds of billions to erect even more?

Approximately 30 percent of all inmates are illegal aliens, people who should not even be here to begin with.

Concerned about run away health care costs and the tens of millions whom are uninsured?

A disproportionate percentage of illegal aliens are uninsured and do not otherwise pay for their heath care, although they somehow manage to send approximately $30 billion a year back to Mexico. Medical services not paid for by illegals are dumped on the backs of Americans who belong here.

Concerned about violent crime, drugs, gangs and the general deterioration of the rule of law?

In addition to the crime of being in America unlawfully, illegal aliens exacerbate crime in this nation.

Concerned about the loss of jobs and reduced standard of living for working Americans?

Illegal aliens undercut American citizens by working for lower wages and without benefits. In effect, they steal jobs from real Americans.

******************

President Obama has encouraged Americans to see that the horrendous economic meltdown also includes a "great opportunity" for the future.

Perhaps the president and his colleagues in the Democrat party should set the example by taking advantage of this unique opportunity to end, and reverse, illegal immigration, a crisis that plagues the nation's economic, social, cultural, and educational systems?

For instance, unemployed American citizens should be used to complete the border fence between America and Mexico, and be trained to work with law enforcement authorities to ferret out illegals for deportation.

That would put needy Americans to work on a rule of law issue vital to our sovereignty and homeland security, and would make jobs held by illegal aliens available to citizens.

With Democrats committed to spending trillions of dollars of taxpayer money to revive the economy, why not fix the illegal alien mess, once and for all, by building a viable border fence and by sending those who have no business being here back to their nations of origin?

Where in Bloody Hell Is Janet Napolitano?

By John W. Lillpop


Janet Napolitano may be a perfectly wonderful daughter, sister, niece, aunt, and significant other.

However, she has no business serving as Secretary of Homeland Security, unless one is more concerned with affirmative action quotas than the lives and well-being of 300 million Americans.

Placing Napolitano in that vital post is a clear indication that President Obama is in total denial about the fact that America is at war. It also exposes his flagrant disregard for US borders and immigration laws.

Echoing Obama’s position, Napolitano considers it her job to be a “Welcoming Greeter” for illegal aliens, rather than enforcer of the law. In other words, she is smitten with bass-akwards thinking, a genetic disorder common in practicing liberals.

To date, under Napolitano’s watch, America has suffered two acts of attempted terrorism, one of which was successful.

Her “the system worked” comment after the Christmas Day “underwear bomber” episode is still amusing people everywhere, especially Osama bin Laden and his Al-Quaeda killer thugs.

However, even some Democrats are finally waking up to the arrogance and ineptness of this woman and they are not amused.

As reported, in part, at CNN.com (1):


“Washington (CNN) - Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano is in hot water for not appearing Wednesday at a congressional hearing on the failed attempt to blow up a U.S.-bound airliner on Christmas Day.

“House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Bennie Thompson said the committee had been told Napolitano would be out of the country and agreed to have her deputy, Jane Holl Lute, testify in her absence.

“But Thompson said he understood that Napolitano's schedule changed and she was in Washington. He said the committee should have been informed if she was unable to attend for another reason.”

So, the big question of the day is: Where in bloody hell is Janet Napolitano?

From the perspective of this unbiased reporter, it is clear that Napolitano has abandoned her post in pursuit of one or more of the following objectives:

( ) Advising illegal aliens that the United States now regards them as “Newly Arrived Fugitives,” rather than the correct designation as invading criminals.

( ) Personally escorting “Newly Arrived Fugitives” across the Mexican border and directly to DNC voter registration offices with an eye to growing the Democrat Party base in time for the 2010 elections.

( ) Updating her DHS memo concerning right-wing extremists to include all Massachusetts voters who voted for Scott Brown, including Brown himself, as potential terrorists that the government needs to scrutinize very carefully.


Janet Napolitano as Secretary of Homeland Security?

Come on Mr. President, its time to face reality: Napolitano must go!



(1)
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/01/27/napolitano-criticized-for-not-attending-house-hearing/

Obama Needs “Stupid Ideas” Czar

By John W. Lillpop

America’s deliberate slide into to a Marxist, third-world abyss can be explained by the fact that our president is a 48 year old spoiled brat, reckless and fickle, unfit for command. Clearly, this president needs a “stupid ideas” czar to filter out his most dangerous ideas before they can be implemented.

Stupid ideas like closing GITMO and trying KSM in New York City. Like a trillion dollar stimulus bill that has failed to stop the historic rise in unemployment. Like flying off to Copenhagen to campaign for the City of Chicago, only to be humiliated by the IOC.

Like criticizing American policy and leaders while on foreign soil.

And on and on it goes. An aggressive “Stupid Ideas” czar would have nipped those Obama blunders immediately.

Unfortunately, the elected Congressional officials charged with providing “over sight” of the Executive Branch are too danged old to see their own flaws, much less those of our dithering president.

Consider the ages of these Congressional stalwarts:

Robert Byrd (93)
Diane Feinstein (79)
John McCain (73)
Nancy Pelosi (70)
Barbara Boxer (70)
Harry Reid (70)
John Kerry (67)

Does any one honestly believe that a geezer in his 70s gives a tinker’s dam about running up a federal debt that will be due and payable two generations hence?

The liberals listed above are interested in one thing and one thing only: Spend as much of your money on socialized medicine,illegal aliens, global warming scams and other foolishness as needed to remain in power!

Period!

Of course they insist that they are “public servants,” but with all due respect, just how much service is Robert Byrd providing? The man cannot walk, and is barely able to breathe.

Seems to me that a real public servant would do the honorable thing by getting out of the way and allowing a younger, more able Republican to take his fractured seat in the Senate.

Ala Scott Brown, Senator Byrd!

The same applies to Pelosi, Reid, Boxer, Feinstein, McCain, and Reid. Leave office now and let your career end with an act of grace and dedication to the best interests of the American people.

Yes, I know that John McCain is a Republican. But folks the man is more liberal than some communists, and he is just too old to be trusted with the awesome power granted to a US Senator.

We need a mandatory retirement age for the weasels in Congress. How about 65?

We the people also need a “stupid ideas” Czar to keep Obama from ruining his family name and America with stupid policies!

Caning of SCOTUS Exposes Obama's Lack of Prime Time Sophistication

By John W. Lillpop

President Obama slithered to a new low on Wednesday by lashing out at the US Supreme Court during his State of the Union address.

The assembled justices, representing an equal branch of government, were not afforded equal time to rebut the president, although Judge Alito begged to differ with the fallen messiah and made that fact abundantly clear by mouthing his dissent.

Tolerating dissent does not appear to be one of this president’s strengths; nevertheless, this is still America and Alito showed remarkable restraint by not shouting out “YOU LIE!” at our befuddled leader.

In addition to being tacky and down right rude, Obama’s outburst shows an embarrassing lack of maturity and good sense.

After all, Obama has an agenda for change that would displace many institutionalized American values. Implementing such change is certain to provoke legal challenges, including cases that will inevitably wind up before the very justices that Obama was slamming so ferociously.

Why would any president with even a lick of common sense choose to publicly humiliate the people who could very well make or break his presidency?

What was the motivation? Was Obama simply providing a sassy punch line for leftist nut balls in Congress to cheer?

If so, that would be a pity. Democrats hold the White House and majorities in both houses and yet the only thing to cheer is a presidential caning of the Supreme Court?


Clearly, President Obama is not ready for prime time. He needs to reboot his entire political career and pronto.

Perhaps a stint of taking coffee to the Clintons is more in line with your capabilities at this time and would enhance your political acumen, Mr. President?

Finally, it appears that the issue of Obama’s birth certificate can be safely put on hold, at least temporarily.

Instead, let’s demand to see his High School diploma!

Time to Eliminate Czars and Handmaidens, Mr. President!

By John W. Lillpop

Scores of millions of Americans are fitfully waiting the unveiling of the new and improved President Obama, set to roll out at 9 tonight.

A word of caution, Mr. President: People are looking for real CHANGE this time, mostly to the wrong-headed policies and decisions that you have implemented over the past 12 months.

We hear that you will propose a spending “freeze” in order to address the huge deficit that you, Speaker Pelosi and Senate Leader have rung up.

With all due respect, sir, isn’t a freeze just too little, too late?

From a taxpayers’ perspective, it certainly seems that the Obama deficit has grown so unwieldy that only a legitimate slash and burn effort stands a chance at making a difference. Running in place should not be an option.

Only real CHANGE will do, sir.

When it comes to identifying unneeded bloat in government, you could make a decent start simply by looking around the White House itself.

For instance, why in Hades does a man with an IQ of 170 need 40 “czars” to keep track of doings in government? Better to slash the unneeded programs AND the czars. Do it now for the people!

And can you please explain to the American people, many of whom have lost their homes or are in the process of suffering that indignity, why the FLOTUS needs 30 or so hand maidens to tend to her personal needs?

Surely, there must be a less costly way to provide a family of four with luxury and comfort in the White House?

When it comes to wasteful spending, why not propose a freeze on all non-essential congressional travel? Like Speaker Pelosi’s million dollar extravaganza in which she loaded a few Air Force jets with leftist cheerleaders to watch you fail at the global warming farce in Copenhagen?

Why not force Pelosi to justify why she had to go to Copenhagen and why it was necessary for her to take most of San Francisco with her on a winter’s holiday-- at taxpayer expense?

Speaking of wasteful boondoggles, perhaps you and Michelle should pool your money with that of Oprah in order to pay the US Treasury back for the money spent to transport the three of you to Copenhagen in your failed attempt to have the 2016 Olympics staged in Chicago?

Even greater savings could be realized by using common sense in the handling of KSM and other brutal terrorists. Is it really necessary to spend $200 million a year just to try these renegades in New York City when a military tribunal is much more than they deserve?

Why not abandon your leftist agenda, sir, and “spread the wealth” back to the American people from whence it came?