Obama Debt: $20,000,000,000,000 by 2020!

By John W. Lillpop


As reported, in part, by spectator.org (1), Barack Obama’s reckless budget plans will cause the US debt to swell to $20,000,000,000,000 by year 2020.

Twenty trillion dollars!

Excerpts from the report:

“The Congressional Budget Office has released its assessment of President Obama's budget, and the results aren't pretty. According the analysis, deficits in the next decade will be worse than what the White House has projected, much higher than they would be if we were to follow current law, and even higher than what CBO had forecast last year.

“Between 2011 and 2020, the nation will accumulate $9.8 trillion in deficits as a under the Obama budget, according to the CBO, ending the decade with $20.3 trillion in public debt, which translates into a staggering 90 percent of gross domestic product (compared with the 53 percent Obama "inherited" in 2009).

By contrast, in its own budget release, the White House Office of Management and Budget had projected debt at 18.6 trillion in 2020 (or about $1.7 trillion less than the CBO).

“Obama's budget would also add more to the debt when it is viewed relative to the CBO baseline scenario that assumes current law is followed, as demonstrated by the area chart below. The blue area represents the additional debt created by Obama's budget -- while it may not look huge, the difference reaches about $5 trillion relative to the CBO baseline scenario (or added debt of 23 percent of GDP) by 2020.”

Is living in a fascist nanny state run by incompetent Marxists really worth $20 trillion dollars?

Of course not.

All the more reason why patriotic Americans people must reverse the mistakes of the 2008 election by taking the United States Congress out of the hands of Democrat politicians!


(1) http://spectator.org/blog/2010/03/08/cbo-sees-obama-budget-bringing

Barack Obama’s Calming Influence at the Oscars

By John W. Lillpop


Watching the Academy Awards this year was more memorable for what was not said than what was.

In recent years, this special night from Tinsel Town has become a veritable launching pad for deranged leftists to vent their anger, despair, and misguided hysteria, aimed nostly at George W. Bush, with Dick Cheney running a close second.

In fact, it has become fashionable at recent Academy Awards to interrupt the anti-Bush and anti-Cheney tirades only long enough to sneak in an occasional Oscar presentation to this actor, that director, this producer, and so on,

Time was recognized as a precious commodity at the Kodak Theater, so actual Academy Awards business was rushed through at a frantic pace in order to return to the higher purpose for the gathering of elitist stars: The systematic and ruthless trashing of all Republicans, especially those named Bush and Cheney.

In what can only be explained as a minor miracle from on high, the 2010 Academy Awards were mostly about actors, actresses, musical scores, producers, directors and all of the nuts and bolts paraphernalia that makes Hollywood sparkle with excitement and glamour.

It was as though America’s unemployment numbers were tiny, rather than 9.7-16 percent.

Not knowing otherwise, one could have surmised that our nation is living in peace, rather than being in the midst of a significant troop surge in Afghanistan, besides still being ensnarled in Iraq.

There was no flaming rhetoric in which America was blamed for all of the world’s problems. No impassioned pleas to abandon excessive Americanism in favor of being a responsible global citizen.

So, what changed?

Has the Barack Obama experiment ushered in universal prosperity, an end to GITMO, a declining federal deficit, and an era of unprecedented bipartisanship and cooperation to the fore?

Don’t be silly! Things have only gotten worse under the undocumented Marxist now occupying the Oval Office.

But Barack Obama has one huge advantage: Namely, he is not George W. Bush, nor is he conservative, nor is he an American patriot.

And that makes this president a perfect match for the nut ball crowd in Hollywood!

Not-So-Precious Metal: Gore’s Oscar & Obama’s Nobel

Meanwhile, a new controversy is erupting all across the WWW.

Namely, the big question of the day is: Which is the more worthless piece of non-precious metal, Al Gore’s fraudulent Oscar or Obama’s nauseating Nobel peace prize?

And the winner is: A draw.

Both awards were ill advised travesties issued by dim wits to even dimmer bulbs who actually thought they deserved to be honored!

Battle of the Heavy-Weight Titans:

The next most important burning issue from the Red Carpet: Who was the more grotesquely obese at this year’s gala? Would that be Babs Streisand or Oprah?

The Unhealthy Addictions of Barack Obama

By John W. Lillpop


Those who voted for Barack Obama cannot claim that they were not forewarned. In his own words, The One wrote of skirmishes with illegal drugs during his misspent youth.

It’s all there in The Audacity of Hope. Clearly, this is a man of substance..illegal no-nos, that is.

Movie buffs like me are eagerly waiting for Oliver Stone to produce the film version, which should aptly be titled the Joy of Dope, with Robert Downey Jr. as the lead character, in black face of course.

Seriously, all of that drugs and addictions stuff was supposedly in Obama’s past, long since eradicated by The One’s wicked regime of self-discipline and fierce determination.

Despite his past, with a major assist from the mainstream media and other leftist institutions and $750 million dollars in the bank, Barack Obama managed to recast his image for the 2008 elections.

Just in time, he became as clean a a whistle, the ideal role model for children all over the world to emulate.

Unfortunately, since moving into the White House, Obama’s unblemished record has become blemished with an awful admission: The man who would CHANGE everything in the entire universe is unable to kick his habitual use of tobacco.

Scores of millions of Americans, including moi, have managed to quit smoking, despite the best efforts of the evil tobacco companies and advertisers. It was not easy or fun, but it can be done.

So just how is it that the most powerful man in the world, the one who goes to sleep with the nuclear codes under his pillow each night, can not muster the will power and intestinal fortitude to kick a vulgar habit that will ruin his health and set an awful example for his daughters?

Of course Obama tries to dismiss the effects of his smoking on his daughters by claiming that he never smokes in front of them.

Now there is a terrific “teaching opportunity”—engage in brutal self-destructive behavior, but do it in private and it is OK!

Thanks for that, Mr. President!

And now we learn that White House physicians have urged The One to practice moderation when it comes to imbibing spirits.

Moderation? Surely you jest, docs! This president is many things to many people, but being a moderate in anything is not in the top 10,000!

Now that Obama’s unhealthy vulnerability to addictions has been exposed, one is compelled to examine other aspects of his being for signs of additional compulsive-obsessive behavior.

For instance, it seems obvious that President Obama is addicted to compulsive over spending. Who can argue that point when one considers that this man is ringing up the national debt quicker and more dramatically than any previous president in our history?

Moreover, President Obama is clearly addicted to power and the tendency to abuse that power.

Consider Obama’s head strong denial of the will of the people when it comes to health care. His gobbling up of private enterprise, his dangerous compulsion to steal from the rich to give to the poor, his 40-czar empire, deliberately crafted to be exempt from oversight by the US Congress.

In twelve-step recovery lingo, Barack Obama is a control freak.

His only hope for recovery is to admit that he is powerless!

However, if President Obama refuses to do that and continues to act out in the same manner as during his first 14 months in office, the American people will stage one huge intervention this November.

That intervention will surely leave The One powerless, both spiritually and politically!

Is Nancy Pelosi Just a Tad Too Liberal for America?

Satire By John W. Lillpop

With her hostile capture of the Speaker's gavel in 2007, Nancy Pelosi shattered the gender barrier, glass ceiling, and incredulity index all in one fell swoop. Since then, Americans have fretted that she may be just a tad too liberal to be second in the succession line for the presidency.

After all, Comrade Nancy does hail from San Francisco—the only American city that tried to join the former USSR, but was rejected because Moscow found folks here too far to the left.

In order to calm the minds of those fearing the worse from Speaker-Queen Pelsoi, several common myths and exaggerations concerning San Francisco liberalism must be debunked.

Namely, contrary to popular belief, it is NOT:

* A felony to vote Republican in San Francisco, although it is a misdemeanor to register as a Democrat or Independent with the knowing intent of voting Republican at a future date;

* Against the law to fly Old Glory without a special permit--except on Cinco de Mayo day when the Mexican flag is preeminent, and must not be mocked with vulgar displays of excessive Americanism;

* A hate crime to speak English, except at fast-food restaurants, car washes, emergency rooms, and when speaking to Hispanics obviously here illegally;

* A violation to wear the uniform of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marines, unless one does so with an arrogant, “America First,” George W. Bush-type of belligerence.

* True that attending a Christian church will automatically cause one's property taxes to double. There is an appeals process.

* Required that job applicants prove that they are transvestite, gay, handicapped, and a racial minority to qualify. Any one of those qualifications will do.

* A major crime to work at Wal-Mart, provided one can prove he or she is an illegal alien from Mexico and a registered Democrat.

* Possible to get an abortion on those fabulous cable cars, but a woman's inalienable right to privacy may be may be arranged at most self-serve gas stations, progressive piano bars, and at Alcatraz Island after 6pm, except on Mother's Day.

* Enough to be a young Middle Eastern male who speaks Arabic in order to be considered a protected minority. In order to be so classified, one must have been arrested and charged with a terrorist act--- like attempting to move the Golden Gate Bridge to Seattle with an IED.

* Required that straight, white, employed Christian males notify the police 60 days before moving into a new neighborhood. 30 days is sufficient.

* Necessary to enroll as a dues-paying member of ACLU in order to secure a driver’s license. Licensees have 15 days in which to pay an ACLU initiation fee and swear allegiance to atheism, homosexuality, diversity, and liberalism.

* True that convicted sex offenders moving into San Francisco are automatically registered to vote as Democrats: They have 30 days in which to join the party and register.


Therefore, while liberalism is a severe mental disorder that significantly influences Nancy Pelosi’s judgment, the good news is…. Heck, there is no good news!

Run for your bloody lives!

Which Sins, Sister? Count Them and Weep!

By John W. Lillpop


In the March 1 edition of the San Jose Mercury News, the letters to the editor section inlcuded a weepy missive from a "Sister Fahey" who posed a rhetorical “Which Sins?” question with respect to illegal aliens.

The good sister used her bleeding heart pen to argue for amnesty, rather than deportation, of the millions of uninvited "guests" now squatting in America.

"Which Sins?" was Fahey's way of ridiculing those of us who believe that the rule of law should apply to everyone, even those who mow our lawns, wait our tables, clean our homes, and wash our cars, when such labor is provided by those not here legally.

Which sins, sister?

Well, how about violating the borders and immigration laws of our sovereign nation, tax evasion, identity theft, voter fraud, stealing hundreds of billions of dollars each year in public services to which they are not entitled, not paying for medical services which forces hospitals and medical facilities into bankruptcy thereby denying American citizens the use of such facilities, taking millions of jobs that should be filled by Americans, contributing to the over crowding of public schools, reintroducing diseases long eradicated back into America, and degradation of American language and culture with third-world language and ways?

Sorry, Sister Fahey, the logical way to deal with invading criminals is to send them home to their third-word nations of origin, where they are already “legal.”

Let’s spare the American people the costly and time-consuming process of pandering to people who have no legal or moral right to be here!