Senator Durbin (D-IL) Sees Illegal Alien as Future President!

By John W. Lillpop

Apart from the fact that he is woefully ignorant of the U.S. Constitution, Senator Durbin seems unaware of the origins of the community organizer who is currently posing as U.S. president.

As reported at the reference, the never- to- be- mistaken- for- a-Mensa member Senator from Illinois, embarrassed himself with this asinine remark intended solely to pander to Hispanic voters:

"When I look around this room, I see America's future. Our doctors, our teachers, our nurses, our engineers, our scientists, our soldiers, our Congressman, our Senators and maybe our President."

Two immediate points jump out about this incredible faux pas:

( )Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution says: "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

( )Secondly, and perhaps more importantly, by electing Barack Obama as president, the U.S. has already “been there, done that” with the illegal alien nonsense.

Obviously, the "Obama experiment" has been an unmitigated disaster and should never be repeated!

Dick Durbin should read the U.S. Constitution before ceding the nation to illegal aliens!


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/06/29/durbin_illegal_alien_could_be_our_future_president.html

GREAT NEWS: Convicted Murderer “Suffered Greatly” During Execution!

By John W. Lillpop

Bleeding-heart liberals are in a hand-wringing snit over news that a convicted murderer “suffered greatly” during his execution.

As reported at reference 1, in part:

A death-row prisoner who was executed using a new lethal injection drug 'suffered greatly' during the process, a leading U.S. anaesthesiologist has testified.

Roy Willard Blankenship, who was executed on June 23 using pentobarbital - also known as nembutal - was said to be conscious for approximately the first three minutes of the execution and 'suffered greatly'.

Dr David Waisel, an Associate Professor of Anaesthesia at Harvard Medical School, also said in the sworn affidavit that 'his eyes were open throughout', according to witness accounts.

He said: 'I can say with certainty that Mr Blankenship was inadequately anaesthetised and was conscious for approximately the first three minutes of the execution.
'Mr Blankenship should not have been conscious or exhibiting these movements, nor should his eyes have been open, after the injection of pentobarbital.'

Suffered greatly, did he? Hooray for Georgia!

The story did not mention that Blankenship was convicted for murdering a 78-ear-old woman, as described in reference 2:

ATLANTA - Blankenship was convicted of the 1978 murder of Sarah Mims Bowen, who died of heart failure during the attack. Her bloody, nude body was discovered by friends and neighbors after the attack, and police were able to trace footsteps to the area where Blankenship lived across the street. They also matched blood scrapings and seminal fluid to Bowen.

When police confronted Blankenship two weeks after the killing, he told them that he broke into her apartment, threw her onto a bed and "got my pleasure or whatever you want to call it." He added that he didn't remember some details, saying, "I don't know why I did it. I was drunk. I know I had to be drunk."

Clearl, Sarah Mims Bowen surely suffered greatly and for more than three minutes!

The fact that Blankenship “suffered greatly” is good news and should be widely advertised so as to discourage other would be killers.

Why do liberals lament the fate of a brutal killer while ignoring the abused victim?



Ref 1 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2009873/He-suffered-greatly-Medical-expert-describes-prisoner-thrashed-desperately-botched-execution-new-drug.html#ixzz1QmISno33

Ref 2: http://www.gadailynews.com/news/61171-inmate-roy-willard-blankenshi-set-to-die-for-1978-murder-of-elderly-woman.html#ixzz1QmHxUHiz

Americans Doing Work That Illegal Aliens Will Not Do!

By John W. Lillpop

America’s Homeland Security Boss Janet Napolitano is actually a mole working on behalf on the Mexican government, the ACLU, La Raza and other anti-American vigilante forces.

Napolitano certified her status as a Mexican mole during testimony before the U.S. Senate as reported, in part, at the reference:

Questioned about DHS enforcement Tuesday at a Senate hearing on the DREAM Act, Napolitano confirmed that the department is not interested in deporting "DREAM Act students."

"We have provided information about what it would take to do removal of everyone in the country. It's obvious that those resources aren't available, …" Napolitano said”

Earth to moon bat Napolitano: America has at least 14 million Americans out of work. Most if not all would jump at the opportunity to work on Project “Recover American Jobs from Invaders,” which would involve locating and assisting in the posthaste kicking of illegal aliens back across the U.S. border into Mexico.

There may be many others even willing to work for free, just to be a part of the effort to shout out on behalf on American sovereignty, language and culture.

Project “Recover American Jobs from Invaders,” could help reduce the massive Obama unemployment problem while saving the government scores of billions now wasted to support illegals.

How about it, President Obama?

Why not give rule of law a chance and put Americans back to work doing jobs that illegal aliens won’t do? This project could create at least 12-million jobs and will not cost a trillion dollars like your foolish stimulus.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/28/napolitano-dhs-not-looking-to-deport-dream-act-students/#ixzz1QiBn9udE

Is Being Poor in America Unconstitutional?

By John W. Lillpop


Being poor is no fun. As Mae West allegedly once said, “I’ve Been Rich and I’ve Been Poor. Rich is better!”

Right on, Mae!

Being poor is also un-American, anti-capitalism and should be a serious crime.

Being poor in America is a choice. A very bad one.

Most poverty can be attributed to sloth and ignorance, or addiction to drugs and alcohol; conditions that can be reversed by the individual. If said person is willing.

Poverty cannot be fixed by government run by progressives, who have thrown billions of dollars at the problem for decades.

Like most progressive “solutions” the solution has solved nothing and has only made the problem worse!

With progressives in charge, poor people become enslaved to government entitlements, and are stripped of esteem and ambition.

Again, being poor in America is inexcusable and should be declared criminal and unconstitutional.

Poor people living on the public dole are obstructing the constitutional right of Americans to pursue happiness because the government takes money from taxpaers to support the poor.

Which brings me to an astounding fact: The majority of Americans pay NO income taxes whatsoever.

Nada, zero, not one damn penny!

Sorry, moon bats, but ZERO is not a fair share for anyone living in America!

America’s deficit problem and the plight of the impoverished should be attacked by forcing the poor to swear off government entitlements and contribute! By working, succeeding, and prospering.

Of course, many poor have lived in entitlement hell for generations. Which makes their recovery difficult.

Government needs to motivate the poor to succeed, rather than rewarding their dependency with cash.

To President Obama and all Democrats: Get off the backs of the "rich" and go after those who pay no taxes.

After all, this is America!

Obama's "Sacred Cow": Higher Taxes on the Rich!

By John W. Lillpop



After meeting with members of Congress to discuss the debt ceiling crisis, President Obama returned to the failed liberal mantra of tax, tax, tax, and more tax.

As reported at http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/06/29/obama-to-hold-press-conference-amid-budget-talks/, the president said, in part:

“President Obama called on Republicans Wednesday to drop their opposition to tax increases, saying "everybody else" is willing to sacrifice their "sacred cows" for deficit reduction and urging GOP lawmakers to do the same.”

Everyone else, sir?

How can that be the case in light of this astounding fact: The majority of Americans pay NO income taxes whatsoever.

Nada, zero, not one damn penny!

While tens of millions pay NO taxes, Obama wants to pillage and plunder the rich, that one-percent of citizens who already pay the lion’s share of taxes collected here in America.

Just what sort of sense does it make to ignore the majority of people who pay no taxes, while attacking the one-percent of the population that is already paying exorbitant taxes?

The answer is, of course, no sense at all.

In all comes down to votes and power. Unfortunately, there one hell of a lot more scalawags who pay no taxes than there are millionaires and billionaires!

In short, the successful and prosperous are easy targets for people like Joe Biden who believe that paying higher taxes is the “patriotic” thing to do—except when it comes to constituents of the Democrat Party!

The solution to America’s financial woes is to go after those folks who are not paying their “fair share,” even if such people are middle-class Americans!

A Message to the People of Mexico from the People of Texas

By John W. Lillpop

The message below was written by Dave Mundy and posted at https://www.texasnationalist.com/index.php/info/news/tnm-news/815?.

This is an excellent presentation of the historic facts and exposure of the existing political corruptions that mar the relationship between the great state of Texas and Mexico.

The message verbatim as written by Dave Mundy:

Our dear friends:

For some time now there has been great enmity between our peoples when we should, in fact, be close friends. This enmity was created by issues over which neither you nor we control, issues created by our respective federal governments and others who seek to rule, not govern.

We have for years attempted to solve these issues on our side of the border in a rational fashion, but those governments and other power-seekers have resisted our attempts. Therefore, we appeal directly to you.

Let us begin with history, and a misconception which has been ingrained in the consciousness of the people of Mexico by the same autocratic rulers who have kept you, our brothers and sisters, impoverished, uneducated and subservient for more than two centuries.



In 1835 our country rebelled against the dictator who had shredded the Constitution of 1824, and we declared our independence from Mexican rule. That rebellion was against a dictator and the corrupt autocrats he represented, not against the people of Mexico itself, for many of our ancestors considered themselves proud to be citizens of Mexico. Much blood was shed on both sides, but on April 21, 1836, we defeated the army of the dictator Santa Anna, who had betrayed his own people's trust, and won our independence.

For ten years after the Battle of San Jacinto, Texas sought peace with Mexico but found only enmity from a federal government which repressed its people and continued to be corrupt and authoritarian. In 1845, Texas applied for admission to the United States, and when that same federal government in Mexico City attacked the United States, Texans were again forced to take up arms against their mother country.
Historians agree that the United States should not have defeated Mexico. Mexico's armies were more numerous and better-trained than the hastily-conscripted American forces – but poor leadership and interference from aristocrats trying to profiteer from the war undermined Mexico's effort.

Three times during the War of 1846-48, the American Congress offered honorable peace terms to the Mexican Congress. Three times, those terms were rejected. It was only after American troops stormed Mexico City itself that the United States dictated a peace which included the cession of what would become the states of California, Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada and others. Those lands, while claimed by Mexico, were sparsely populated and the government in Mexico City exercised almost no control over them. And even then, the United States Congress tendered millions of dollars in payment for those lands, and for a second strip of disputed land several years later.

For more than 150 years, the autocrats have told the Mexican people that those lands, including Texas, were "stolen" by the United States in an imperialistic manner. The truth is, it was the autocrats of Mexico who lost those lands with their greed, their corruption and their military ineptitude. For more than 150 years, those rich aristocrats have preached the concept of "reconquista" of those territories, including Texas, to the people of Mexico when in fact their only aim has been to distract the Mexican people from the corruption, graft and greed which undermines every facet of Mexican government.

In 1973, the Ministry of the Interior issued a report which outlined the idea of "reconquista" by the waging of demographic warfare – flooding the United States' border states with Mexico's "undesirable" people, with the idea of establishing a majority in those states of Mexican citizens and having them vote to secede from the United States and re-join Mexico under the guise of fervent nationalism. Since that time, the government of Mexico has encouraged and even helped its most "undesirable" citizens – its poorest, least-educated and in some cases, most criminal – to cross the border into the United States in support of that policy.

Yet what the people of Mexico are not being told is that they are being used and manipulated. What good could come from re-gaining all those lands if the same aristocrats remain in power in Mexico City and the same corruption, graft and greed is brought across the border?
Lies have been fomented by both our national governments to undermine the fabric of both our peoples. You have been told, perhaps, that the immigration policies of the United States are unjust and unfair; yet the immigration policies of Mexico are far more restrictive. Research for yourselves, and judge.

You may have been told that the Mexican people have been "migrants" for "thousands of years" – when the truth is even before the coming of the Spanish and other Europeans, the ancient kingdoms of the Aztecs, Toltecs and others were well-ordered empires with firmly established borders, and almost no contact with the scattered tribes of natives of the desert territories which would eventually become the American Southwest.

Many of these lies have been spread by figures on the American side of the border who are part of organizations such as MEChA, La Raza and the Nation of Aztlan. They promise prosperity and greatness and cloak themselves in patriotism – yet their promises are false and their motives are the same as the aristocracy which has held Mexico back from true progress for 200 years. The socialism they embrace is the same socialism which enslaved the peoples of Russia, China, Eastern Europe and other nations for hundreds of years; they mean to set themselves up as dictators.

At the same time, there are American politicians who are equally corrupt and greedy who seek to use you for their own ends – namely, to stay in power. They, too, make false promises – that of "free" government aid programs which do nothing but slowly suck those enrolled in them into dependency on handouts, tearing down individual initiative, responsibility and motivation. They seek to use you to create a vast class of impoverished votes they can continually count on to retain their dictatorial powers.

Our brothers and sisters, we implore you to stop listening to the lies perpetrated by the aristocrats, politicians and would-be communist dictators!

Ask yourselves why you are being forced to leave your homeland to make a living for your families.

Mexico is a land of vast resources which have never been exploited. By rights, Mexico should be economically as strong, or stronger, than the United States – yet the aristocracy has resisted every attempt to improve the lives of the Mexican people through economic development. Ask yourselves why the mineral wealth of Coahuila and Chihuahua remain underground, why the schools of Mexico remain substandard and why you can earn more in one day digging a ditch in Arizona than you can in a week selling the produce from your own farm in Sonora.

Why should the people of Mexico have to fear their children being kidnapped on their way home from school, or being shot in the street in front of their home by thugs – thugs wielding guns made in Venezuela? Why can't the same government of Mexico, which is working so hard to "reconquer" lands it has no right to, protect the very people it is supposed to serve?

It is time for the people of Mexico to ask hard questions of those who govern. It is time the people of Mexico cast off the colonial rulers they were supposed to have discarded when they won independence from Spain. It is time for Mexico to assert its greatness.

The people of Texas do not hate you. We share much of our culture, heritage and history with you. You are our family – our brothers and sisters. We want to see you prosper, and grow. We will gladly help you build your home.

But you cannot have our home.

Those of you who wish to move to Texas or to other American states, we ask only that you enter our home through the front door – emigrate legally, not sneaking across the border like some thief. Learn our ways, our language and our culture, rather than trying to supplant them. Our land became great because we assimilated other cultures and took the best from each. Be one with us, not apart from us.



--The People of Texas

https://www.texasnationalist.com/index.php/info/news/tnm-news/815?

“Spanish Imposition” Mars Soccer Matches, Graduations!

By John W. Lillpop


Spanish-language apologists in denial refuse to admit that Latinos, including millions of illegal aliens who should not even be here, refuse to assimilate into American culture by learning and speaking English.

The lie to those denials was exposed in abundance by two recent events, one in California the other in Nevada.

The first involved a soccer match between the U.S. and Mexican teams in Los Angeles. Under normal, common-sense circumstances, the U.S. athletes would be the “home” team since the match was in fact in the U.S.

WRONG!

As reported at the reference, the American team was treated as if it were a hostile “visiting” team:

It was imperfectly odd. It was strangely unsettling. It was uniquely American.

On a balmy early Saturday summer evening, the U.S soccer team played for a prestigious championship in a U.S. stadium ... and was smothered in boos.

Its fans were vastly outnumbered. Its goalkeeper was bathed in a chanted obscenity. Even its national anthem was filled with the blowing of air horns and bouncing of beach balls.

Most of these hostile visitors didn't live in another country. Most, in fact, were not visitors at all, many of them being U.S. residents whose lives are here but whose sporting souls remain elsewhere.

Welcome to another unveiling of that social portrait known as a U.S.-Mexico soccer match, streaked as always in deep colors of red, white, blue, green ... and gray.

To add insult to injury, the post-match ceremony was conducted in Spanish, causing U.S. Goalkeeper Tim Howard to remark, “I think it was a [expletive] disgrace that the entire post-match ceremony was in Spanish. You can bet your ass that if we were in Mexico City, it wouldn’t be all in English.”

Right on Mr. Howard! And add a extra dozen expletives for emphasis!

The other incident took place in Nevada where an air-head principal decided that his commencement speech should be blathered in Spanish as well as English:


ZEPHYR COVE, Nev. (CBS13) – He congratulated the graduating class of 2011, but one but one principal’s commencement speech actually offended some in the crowd.

The graduating class at Whittell High School has only 30 students. Just a few weeks ago during graduation their principal gave an encouraging speech congratulating his students and their parents.

“Class of 2011, I want to congratulate you for all your accomplishments this year,” said Principal Crespin Esquivel.

He then said the same thing in Spanish, making sure his commencement speech could also be understood by his Spanish speaking parents and students who make up the second largest group of the school.

“I figured why not do it in Spanish? I think it’s important for me to make sure all the families feel comfortable,” said Esquivel”

Turns out that in his zeal to pander to Hispanics,Esquivel failed to make several Americans comfortable. The woman who complained about Esquivel’s Spanish translation sparked a debate online.

To Esquivel and all of the other renegades behind the Spanish Imposition:

This is America, dudes. We don’t need no stinkin’ Spanish here!

Comprhende?



Reference 1:

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/26/sports/la-sp-0626-plaschke-gold-cup-20110626

Reference 2:

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2011/06/27/principal-criticized-for-delivering-graduation-speech-in-spanish/

In Search of Additional Revenues? Why Ignore Those Who Pay No Taxes!

Satire by John W. Lillpop

Astounding fact: The majority of Americans pay NO income taxes whatsoever.

Nada, zero, not one damn penny!

This is the result of Democrat-sponsored exemptions, deductions, and other gimmicks which allow seniors, people in the middle class, the poor, large families, disabled and other “constituents” of Barack Obama, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi to avoid paying their “fair share.”

Sorry, moon bats, but ZERO is not a fair share for anyone living in America!

On the other hand, left-wing crazies want to pillage and plunder the rich, that upstanding one-percent of patriotic citizens who already pay the lion’s share of taxes.

Think about it: Here America stands on the brink of financial meltdown and Democrats want to invade the pocketbooks of those overburdened, under appreciated, and abused folks referred to as the rich.

Just what sort of sense does it make to ignore the majority of people who pay no taxes, while attacking the one-percent of the population that is already paying exorbitant taxes?


The answer is, of course, no sense at all.

Except to power-mad liberals who do not give a damn about fairness or equality, but who are addicted to power.

In all comes down to votes and power. Unfortunately, there one hell of a lot more scalawags who pay no taxes than there are millionaires and billionaires!

In short, the successful and prosperous are easy targets for people like Joe Biden who believe that paying higher taxes is the “patriotic” thing to do—except when it comes to constituents of the Democrat Party!

The solution to all of America’s financial woes is to go after those folks who are not paying their “fair share,” that being the middle class, poor, and others who manage to avoid taxes altogether.

Significantly, those who pay no taxes are the same folks who knock the federal piggy bank out of whack with excessive demands on entitlement and discretionary spending.

That would be the tens of millions of people placed on the public dole by Democrats in order to purchase votes for their party.

So, you see, it is not the rich who are ruining America!

Rather it is the poor and middle class who need to clean up their acts.

America needs to rewrite the tax code so as to punish those who take but give little, or nothing, in return. A “Poverty Surcharge” would do the trick.

Here’s how it would work: Any family that earns less than $30,000 in any tax year would be assessed a Poverty Surcharge, nominally 2 % of gross income.

Another example: An unmarried woman with four children who is on welfare should be penalized for having more kids!

For each additional child she brings into the world, her monthly welfare check should be cut by 20 percent. All welfare income should be taxable, with no deductions allowed.

This would help bring down the deficit AND motivate the poor, down trodden, and irresponsible to get off their “Pity Pots.”

The new American model should be “Contribute your fair share, or perish!” and it should apply to all.

The notion that the rich should subsidize millions of slothful folk who do nothing but sit on their bottoms while watching Oprah reruns is “Old school,” immoral, and must stop!

Liberal Outrage over Weiner’s Immoral Behavior: Belly Laughs Galore!

Satire By John W. Lillpop

While the Anthony Weiner scandal was deadly serious and cause for grave concern, it is nonetheless hysterical to hear Democrats scream foul about morality and decency. Both subjects have all but been eliminated from the liberal vocabulary, especially since the perverted administration of Bill Clinton.

In fact, comparing the case histories of Anthony Weiner and Bill Clinton helps to place the weiner crisis in perspective.

To wit, unlike Bill Clinton, Weiner did not:

* Lie under oath about a sexual relationship with a subordinate (Monica Lewinski) on government property (The White House).

* Discuss military matters on the telephone with a member of the U.S. Congress while receiving oral sex from an intern (Monica Lewinsky) in the Oval Office.

* Leave a foreign leader (Yassar Arafat) waiting in the Rose Garden of the White House while engaging in sex with the same intern.

* Sexually assault (allegedly) a volunteer worker (Kathleen Wiley) in the White House.

* Rape (allegedly) an associate (Juanita Broderick).

Furthermore, at least Weiner had the good sense to resign, albeit with pressure from Nancy Pelosi, Debbie Wasserman Schultz and other feminists just now discovering the wild, wonderful world of morality!

Obviously, Clinton’s sexual transgressions have nothing to do with those of former Rep. Weiner.

But watching liberals gag on their own words while feigning outrage over the sexually explicit nature of Weiner's e-mails is the most entertaining theater seen in Washington, D.C., since Clinton’s impeachment in December of 1998!

Does America Really Want the Likes of Jose Antonio Vargas?

By John W. Lillpop


Those who advocate on behalf on illegal aliens have argued that America simply cannot do without the 12-20 million criminals squatting in our midst.

“Who will pick our fruit?” “Who will mow our lawns, who will wash our cars, clean our lavatories, etc. ,” they rant.

Things are dramatically different when it comes to illegal alien Jose Anthony Vargas, the Filipino criminal who has lived and lied in America for 18 years.

Rather than asking “Who will pick our fruit?” morons arguing for Vargas are crying, “Who will write our Pulitzer Prize winning news stories and articles?”

Apparently, fears of a devastating shortfall of Pulitzer Prize quality writers has driven morons like David Leopold to the edge of insanity with remarks like those in the reference, repeated below, in part:


“MANILA, Philippines – An official of the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA) thinks it is highly unlikely that Filipino Pulitzer Prize winner Jose Antonio Vargas will be deported.

David Leopold said, “Jose Vargas is the kind of person that we want in America.”

A lying, cheating criminal who has ignored our immigration laws for 20 years is the sort of bloke that America wants?

Please, the insanity of that is just too much!

To be fair, Vargas does have one thing going for him: He is not a garden -variety Latino who simply jumped a border fence.

Other than that, Vargas is just as despicable and UNWANTED in America as any other illegal alien who cleans toilets or operates a leaf blower eight hours a day!

The simple fact is that Vargas and all of the other 12-20 million invaders come from cultures and societies inferior to American institutions, which means that screening out undesirables is not only preferable, but is, in fact, mandatory.

Legal migration to America is available to folks like Vargas.

There exists a path to citizenship that involves examining one’s background for evidence of criminal behavior, for medical exams to determine health status, for determining ability to live independently without becoming a burden on taxpayers, for ties to drug cartels and terrorists, and other inquiry to determine worthiness to join our American family.

This process is exacting and discriminatory, which it must be to protect the interests of American citizens.

America’s immigration laws exist to protect American citizens, not to mine for Pulitzer Prize prospects, grape pickers, or car washers.

Jose Antonio Vargas deserves to be arrested and deported immediately, just like any other criminal invader!

Gay, Anxious to Wed and Stuck in San Francisco? Head East, Young Men!

Satire by John W. Lillpop

Over the years, tens of thousands of homosexuals have left America's heartland in order to experience the liberating freedom of the wild, wild west, and in particular, California, and even more particularly, the queen's paradise, otherwise known as San Francisco.

In what must be the ultimate irony for those who journeyed west in search of progressive permissiveness and moral-free living, the state of New York has legalized gay marriage!

As reported, in part, at Yahoo News:

ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — After days of contentious negotiations and last-minute reversals by two Republican senators, New York became the sixth and largest state in the country to legalize gay marriage, breathing life into the national gay rights movement that had stalled over a nearly identical bill here two years ago.

Pending any court challenges, legal gay marriages can begin in New York by late July after Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed his bill into law just before midnight Friday.

At New York City's Stonewall Inn, the Greenwich Village pub that spawned the gay rights movement on a June night in 1969, Scott Redstone watched New York sign the historic same-sex marriage law with his partner of 29 years, and popped the question.

"I said, 'Will you marry me?' And he said, 'Of course!'" Redstone said he and Steven Knittweis walked home to pop open a bottle of champagne.

New York becomes the sixth state where gay couples can wed, doubling the number of Americans living in a state with legal gay marriage.”

Meanwhile, in the Queen City of San Francisco, gays are still not allowed to tie the nuptial knots.

For gays stuck in stodgy, old, conservative San Francisco, the new slogan of hope will probably be, "Go East, young men!"

Multiculturalism No Longer Chic in Netherlands: Pay Attention, Democrats!

By John W. Lillpop


As America continues to drift further and further toward the abyss of unsustainable liberalism, those who have “been there, done that” know better and are going in exactly the opposite direction.

As reported in part at the reference, the Dutch FINALLY recognize that the insanity of multiculturalism needs to be reversed:

A new integration bill which Dutch Interior Minister Piet Hein Donner presented to parliament on June 16, reads: "The government shares the social dissatisfaction over the multicultural society model and plans to shift priority to the values of the Dutch people. In the new integration system, the values of the Dutch society play a central role. With this change, the government steps away from the model of a multicultural society."

The letter continues: "A more obligatory integration is justified because the government also demands that from its own citizens. It is necessary because otherwise the society gradually grows apart and eventually no one feels at home anymore in the Netherlands. The integration will not be tailored to different groups."

The new integration policy will place more demands on immigrants. For example, immigrants will be required to learn the Dutch language, and the government will take a tougher approach to immigrants to ignore Dutch values or disobey Dutch law.

The government will also stop offering special subsidies for Muslim immigrants because, according to Donner, "it is not the government's job to integrate immigrants." The government will introduce new legislation that outlaws forced marriages and will also impose tougher measures against Muslim immigrants who lower their chances of employment by the way they dress. More specifically, the government will impose a ban on face-covering Islamic burqas as of January 1, 2013.”

Imagine that! A society where no one feels at home!


Sounds eerily like California and other U.S. states inundated with millions of uneducated, non-English speaking invaders from Mexico and points south.

Been to Los Angeles or New York City lately?

The notion that "it is not the government's job to integrate immigrants," is a vital truth that is clearly lost on President Obama and Janet Napolitano and the Democrat Party!

The Dutch have also hit gold with their requirement that immigrants learn the home language and accept home land values. More truths lost on Democrats!

OMG! Are those bleeping Dutch out of their bleeping minds? What about inclusiveness, open borders, and all of the other stupidity that has America headed toward a third-world status akin to dreary old Mexico?

Clearly, the Dutch have been infested with racism and Islamaphobia!

Or, looking at it logically, the Dutch have finally seen the light and recognize that multiculturalism is a crock that serves nobody!

Democrats in America should acquaint themselves with the awful consequences of multiculturalism before pushing amnesty for 20 million illegal aliens! Do it for the citizens!


http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2011/06/netherlands_abandoning_multiculturalism.html

10 Fundamentals That Conservatives Running for Office Must Understand

By John W. Lillpop


 Government exists, at the will of the people, to provide a common defense against enemies of America, both foreign and domestic. We the people neither need, nor want, government bureaucrats telling us what to eat, how to raise children, what light bulbs to use, or other matters best left in the hands of the family.

 America was founded by men and women strong in the Christian faith. Denying our religious heritage for the purpose of politically-correct inclusion is morally wrong.


 Government has neither the resources nor the expertise to provide health care, to educate our youth, or to create jobs. In these ,as well as in most areas of life, government serves we the people best by getting out of the way!

 Racism is a wretched evil, made all the more damaging by its devastating impact on the human spirit. On the other hand, alleging racism, where it does not exist, for political, social, or economic gain is just as evil.

 Using the tax code to punish the accomplished in order to reward the less talented and bone idle is un-American and immoral. Taxes depress economic growth and the creation of jobs for American citizens and should always be challenged and opposed.

 Every dollar paid in taxes is one less dollar available to private enterprise for job creation.


 The use of armed military force should be limited to situations involving a vital national interest of the United States. No president, regardless of how brilliant, should make war(or Kinetic whatever) without the consent of Congress.

 Illegal immigration is a serious breach of borders and rule of law which harms America’s economy, employment, education, culture, and homeland security, and which costs American taxpayers more than $110 billion a year. Exploiting this issue as a means for growing the Democrat Party base rather than enforcing the rule of law to protect American citizens is un-American and immoral.

 There is nothing racist about defending American sovereignty, language and culture. On the other hand, racism is abundant when foreigners come here illegally and refuse to learn English and refuse to assimilate into American society.

 Character, integrity, and fidelity do matter! Without these qualities, no politician can possibly serve we the people.

Illegal Alien Jose Antonio Vargas,: Get the Hell Out, and Take Your Tainted Pulitzer Prize With You!

Illegal Alien Jose Antonio Vargas,: Get the Hell Out, and Take Your Tainted Pulitzer Prize With You!

By John W. Lillpop


The story of Jose Antonio Vargas is hardly one of courage, hard work, and dedication to principle. His is NOT an American story that one can point to with pride.

Rather, it is a sad commentary about self-centered lying, deceit, and stealing through manipulation with no regard for the rule of law or other people.

It is about a nation that has lost its way and apparently no longer cares enough to enforce the rule of law, the foundation of our American Democracy.

The fact that Vargas and much of the mainstream media see his criminal behavior as justification for passing the race-based Dream Act is nearly as sick as his despicable criminality.

Jose Antonio Vargas is owed no sympathy or kudos.

He should be arrested and deported immediately, lest his persona be martyred by those who despise the rule of law, American sovereignty, language, and culture.

Adios, and good Riddance!

Secure Borders? Where? For Whom?

By John W. Lillpop

Janet Napolitano is infamous for declaring that the “borders have never been more secure.” That may be the case in some isolated corner of the world, say the North Pole, but it is certainly NOT the case when it comes to the U.S.- Mexico border.

As reported in part at the reference:

A convoy of three military trucks loaded with Mexican soldiers crosses the border at Bridge Number Two clearly violating international law.

It happens as Customs and Border Protection inspectors try to figure out what to do.

A CBP spokesperson says they got on the phone with Mexican authorities after being alerted that the military trucks were heading their direction loaded down with soldiers and weapons.

Mexican leaders say the soldiers, who had just been deployed to Nuevo Laredo, didn't know the area, got lost and then made their way through Bridge Two.

It's important to note that CBP did not tell us about the potentially serious situation. It came from another law enforcement agency.

Some callers to our newsroom were upset inspectors allowed the Mexican military to get so close to all those inspection booths over at Bridge Number Two.

Some noted had it been Mexican drug lords they could have taken inspectors by surprise and easily crossed the international border deeper into the United States.”

What would Napolitano say to the idea that Mexican Drug lords were capable of invading deep into the United States?

Likely response from Obama and Big Sis:

“They are actually ‘Newly Arrived Refugees’ so let’s extend a warm American welcome along with a path to citizenship and immediate registration in the Democrat Party to these abused and misunderstood heroes!”

http://www.pro8news.com/news/local/Mexican-troops-cross-into-the-United-States--124469714.html

Greater Risk: Blowing Money in Las Vegas or Paying into Social Security-Medicare?

By John W. Lillpop

In February 2010, President Barack Obama advised people trying to save money not to “blow a bunch of cash in Vegas.”

That was the second time this anti-business President has seen fit to use his bully pulpit to wage war on the Las Vegas tourist industry, known affectionately all across America as Sin City.

Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman, fuming with rage at Obama’s intemperate remarks, summed up the president’s second faux pas thusly, "This president is a real slow learner."

Current budget battles over taxes and spending, the War Powers Act, and a host of other crises, prove that Mayor Goodman was prophetic about Obama’s learning disability!

While Obama misuses his pulpit/teleprompter to destroy the economy and jobs, there is a major economic risk that Obama and Democrats are ignoring.

Namely, anyone under 55 who is paying into the liberal-created Ponzi schemes known as Social Security and Medicare is throwing money down the toilet.

Both of these progressive mistakes are destined for bankruptcy.

The only question, really, is WHEN?

That question seems unanswerable because liberals like Obama and Harry Reid refuse to fact the facts.

Truth, as it were, is just too painful, especially so close to an national election.

“Let’s wait 20 years and see what happens,” is the counsel answer from geezers like Harry Reid who will probably be dead and buried long before the Social Security administration starts issuing monthly bills rather than benefits checks.

Obama and Reid need to read and understand the report issued by the CBO, which paints a dreary picture, indeed.

That report is shown,in part, at the reference and summarized below:

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released its Long-Term 2011 Budget Outlook Report, Wednesday, with dire projections for the nation’s fiscal future if the current path is not changed. The CBO called its budget outlook “daunting.”

Under current law, federal spending will continue to soar and an aging populations will increasingly draw funds from programs like Medicare and Social Security. According to the new report, in order to prevent the debt from becoming unsustainable, revenues need to increase and spending needs to be cut from projected levels.

One of the more dire figures in Wednesday’s report is the CBO’s projection that by the end of 2011, federal debt will reach approximately 70 percent of gross domestic product – the highest level it has been since the end of World War II.

The report also says that under current law, the aging population combined with rising health care costs will cause spending on health programs like Medicare, and Social Security, to rise to 15 percent of GDP in 25 years. Right now, that spending is 10 percent of GDP. To put that number in perspective, over the last 40 years, all government spending, except for interest payments on the debt, has averaged 18.5 percent of GDP.”

On the same day as the CBO report made the breaking news headlines, Harry Reid and other moon bats on the left demanded additional stimulus spending to create jobs!

Talk about “slow learners” !

Add the names of Dick Durbin, Nancy Pelosi, and all the rest on the far-left to the list of those who have learning disabilities brought on by a lifetime of deluded liberal thinking.

An urgent message to anyone under 55: Ignore the words coming from our President and Democrats. Do NOT count on living on Social Security and Medicare.

Playing the odds in Las Vegas may provide the only real hope for surviving the liberal destruction of the “America Dream.”



http://news.yahoo.com/s/dailycaller/20110622/pl_dailycaller/cboreleasesdauntinglongtermbudgetoutlook_1

Yet ANOTHER Scandal Involving a Pelosi Democrat?

By John W. Lillpop


Hey, Nancy P., what happened to your promise to “drain the swamp” after foolish Americans gave Democrats majority status in the U.S. House back in 2006?

Say what? Your swamp-drain-machine was programmed to remove only those with an R next to their names?

Which is why the goofy leader from San Francisco overlooked (ignored?) the less than honorable Alcee Hastings, Democrat from Florida.

Did I mention that Hastings is a DEMOCRAT?


As reported, in part, at the reference:

“The House's independent ethics office is looking into sexual-harassment claims leveled months ago against Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., the Wall Street Journal is reporting.

Citing sources familiar with the inquiry, the Journal reported the investigation, which began at least a month ago, is being conducted by the independent Office of Congressional Ethics and not the House Ethics Committee.

A lawsuit, filed against Hastings on March 7 by the conservative group Judicial Watch on behalf of Helsinki Commission staffer Winsome Packer, alleged that the congressman sexually harassed Packer over the course of more than two years and threatened retaliation if she tried to report it.”

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton told the Journal that his organization had been contacted by investigators and confirmed that Packer is cooperating with OCE.”

Welcome, Mr. Hastings, to the Pelosi House of Corruption! Your admittance is a welcome upgrade to the recent House of Ill Repute which includes recent inductees Charles Rangel and Anthony Weiner!

Nancy Pelosi: The woman who ran the cleanest, least corrupt House in History!

NOT!


http://www.nationaljournal.com/house-ethics-office-investigating-sexual-harassment-claims-against-alcee-hastings-20110621?mrefid=mostViewed

Winnowing Down GOP Candidates Pool—With Help from Harry Reid!

Winnowing Down GOP Candidates Pool—With Help from Harry Reid!


By John W. Lillpop


With so many vying for the Republican presidential nomination in 2012, and with several more likely to still join the fray, the task of culling and selecting the best candidate to defeat Barack Obama can be daunting.

There are exceptions: Tossing out the name of Newt Gingrich is a no-brainer given recent defections by his own people, which show, convincingly, that Newt lacks the skills to run a birthday party, much less the Republican Party and, even less, all of America.

Deciding one way or the other on other contenders is far more complicated, save the most recent combatant, Jon Huntsman.

Huntsman who announced his candidacy with great flare and drama at the Statue of Liberty, immediately received an unexpected and, perhaps unwelcome, endorsement from an unlikely source: U. S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

As reported at the reference,in part, Reid’s meddling in GOP politics mixed religion and ideology:

“Hours after formally announcing his presidential bid, former ambassador to China Jon Huntsman (R) won an endorsement from an unexpected source: Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

At his weekly Capitol news conference, Reid was asked whether he thought the United States was ready for a Mormon president. Huntsman and his fellow rival for the 2012 GOP presidential nod, former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney, are both Mormon, as is Reid. A Gallup poll released Monday showed that 22 percent of Americans would not vote for a Mormon for president.

“I feel very comfortable that they’re not ready for – certainly they’re not ready for the former governor of Massachusetts,” Reid said. “Which says, in that race, if I had a choice, I’d favor Huntsman over Romney.”

Fortunately for all Americans and the future of our great nation, Harry Reid does NOT have a voice in deciding the Republican candidate.

At least not directly.

However, Reid’s endorsement of Huntsman proves that Huntsman is not qualified, by reason of character or ideology, to be anything more than a token Republican in the administration of Barack Obama, the most anti-American, befuddled, and inept president in U.S. history.

Hats off to the goofy Reid for unwittingly providing a terrific reason for crossing through the name of Jon Huntsman.

Got any other endorsements we should know about Harry?


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/2chambers/post/reid-id-back-huntsman-over-romney-for-president/2011/06/21/AGWPBleH_blog.html

Intelligent Question: Why 28,000 Troops in South Korea, Yet Just 1,200 at U.S.-Mexico Border?

By John W. Lillpop

Arizona Sheriff Paul Babeu was recently named 2011 National Sheriff of the Year by the National Sheriff’s Association.

Clearly, this man is an expert in law enforcement and border security. Sheriff Babeu demonstrated his intelligence and expertise when he challenged the completely inadequate efforts by the Obama administration to secure the U.S.-Mexico borders.

As reported at the reference:

“Arizona Sheriff Paul Babeu said the Obama administration’s decision to extend the deployment of 1,200 U.S. National Guard troops along the U.S. border with Mexico until Sept. 30 is “pandering” and that those numbers “fall far short” of what military power is needed to keep the country safe.

Babeu noted, for comparison, the 28,500 U.S. troops stationed in South Korea to help defend it against North Korean aggression; U.S. troops have been stationed in South Korea for 58 years.

Babeu is the sheriff of Pinal County in southern Arizona and is on the frontlines against illegal immigration, human traffickers, drug smugglers, and potential terrorists.

“What are we doing?” Babeu told CNSNews.com by telephone. “We need 6,000 armed soldiers on our border to protect America. Homeland Security starts at home.” He was talking about the National Guard.

Babeu said that only 520 guardsmen are deployed in Arizona, a state with a 276-mile border with Mexico and the state that has, according to the Department of Homeland Security, the greatest influx of illegal aliens. In 2010, approximately 212,000 illegal aliens were seized in the Tucson sector of Arizona – or 47 percent of all illegal aliens taken into custody.

“The gravest national security risk that we face is right here with the insecure border with Mexico,” Babeu said. “Right from the beginning, these 1,200 [National Guard] soldiers fall far short from what’s really, truly needed to achieve a secure border.”

Well said, Sheriff. Of course the honest answer is that Barack Obama and Janet Napolitano really do not want to prevent invasions across our border because they see the illegal aliens as future Democrats.

Hats off to another Arizona sheriff who is standing up and articulating the treason that is being committed by the Obama administration!

War Without Hostilities: Another Obama Fairy Tale!

By John W. Lillpop

Earlier this spring, President Obama ordered the firing of more than 160 cruise missiles into Libya. He justified his action on humanitarian grounds and declared that the conflict would be over in “days, not weeks.”

It was Obama doing his part to make the “Arab Spring” a resounding success. The fact that there was no vital American national interest involved seems to have been lost on our in-over-his-head college professor and community organizer.

More than 90 days later, Libya is still on fire and the Pentagon is reporting that the original cost estimates were vastly understated: Actual costs will approach $1 billion dollars.

Congress has insisted that Obama comply with the War Powers Resolution, which requires Congressional approval within 90 days of the initial military action.

Obama has refused to comply and has insulted the intelligence of the U.S. Congress and the American people by claiming that the U.S. was not involved in “hostilities.”

Let's be clear: One can fire 165 Tomahawk missiles and spend one billion dollars of taxpayer money on the war in Libya without violating the War Powers Act because there were/are no “hostilities” involved?

Mr. President, that has to be one of the most outrageous arguments that your administration has advanced to date.

Even if the “war” is refined as Kinetic Military Action, hostilities have taken place, many based on your orders as Commander-in-Chief.

War without hostilities: Yet another outrageous fairy tale promulgated by progressives in denial!

Republicans Going Wobbly on Linking Debt Ceiling to Spending Cuts?

By John W. Lillpop



The Republican Party is the last and only real hope that America has to reign in suicidal spending and insane debt accumulation by reckless liberals.

Raising the debt ceiling is an issue that provides the GOP with vital leverage in forcing Democrats to see sense.

However, GOP resolve on this issue appears to have developed somewhat of a crack as indicated at the story from the reference which states in part:

“WASHINGTON- Congress and the White House could raise the debt limit for a few months while they seek a comprehensive, long-term budget deal, Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said on Sunday.

The Obama administration has warned it will run out of money to pay the nation's bills if Congress does not raise the $14.3 trillion debt limit by August 2 -- a prospect that could push the country back into recession and upend global financial markets.

"The president and the vice president, everybody knows you have to tackle entitlement reform," McConnell said on CBS's "Face the Nation."

"If we can't do that, then we'll probably end up with a very short-term proposal over, you know, a few months. And we'll be back having the same discussion again in the fall," McConnell said.”

With all due respect to Senator McConnell, given the history of this president and the Democrats, what in the world would cause anyone to believe that Democrats will any more open to reason a few months hence?

By agreeing to a “short-term” fix, Republicans will kick the can down the road, only to be bitten in the tush when autumn leaves start to fall and liberals remain blinded to truth.

Listen up, GOP! You have the leverage now—backing away (even slightly) will only embolden those who created the mess in the first place.

Bottom line: Deal with the debt ceiling now by demanding a dollar-for-dollar tradeoff with spending cuts.

Remember, your probation period expires in November 2012, which is only 17 months away.

Beware!



http://ca.news.yahoo.com/short-debt-limit-hike-possible-mcconnell-195539802.html

A Progressive Checklist to Cull out Racists!

By John W. Lillpop

As a point of reference, racist is formally defined as follows:

Racist - a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others.

In the on-line dictionary from which that definition was derived, the word "white" was omitted before the word "person," no doubt the product of biased editing by a red-necked scalawag from the Old South still immersed in denial.

Keeping the formal definition above in mind, compare it to the applications used by politically correct progressives, ever watchful for wedge issues with which to divide the American people.

According to progressives, you are a racist if you:

*Are on record as believing that American culture, including contributions made by angry white Christian men, has produced the greatest and most successful society in human history;

*Get goose bumps and shivers up and down your spine when Old Glory is feted or when the Star Spangled Banner is performed;

*Believe that America is a sovereign nation and, as such, perfectly justified in securing our borders against invasion by illegal aliens and other criminals;

*Believe that the rule of law is a basic tenet of American democracy, and, as such, inviolable;

*Believe that federal spending and the $14 trillion dollar national debt are destroyng the nation and agree with Paul Ryan's Blueprint for Propserity;

*Support enforcement of the Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986;

*Are proud of the English language, and support making English the official language of commerce, law, education, and culture in America;

*Oppose affirmative action, bilingualism and other reverse discrimination outrages;

*Watch FOX News for more than three hours in any given calendar quarter;

*Believe that the federal government should prevent illegal aliens from taking over American streets to demand rights and benefits reserved for U.S. citizens;

*Believe that Uncle Sam has an obligation to round up and deport illegal aliens, particularly during time of war;

*Believe that legislation is urgently needed to prevent illegal aliens from using "anchor babies" to circumvent U.S. law;

*Adamantly oppose amnesty, defined as anything short of deportation;

*Regard "Sanctuary Cities" as serious violations of federal law that should cause city officials to be arrested and prosecutedl

*Believe that in-state tuition breaks, driver's licenses, and other progressive hand outs serve only to attract even more illegal aliens and should be unlawful;

*Oppose the use of taxpayer funds to print ballots, government information, and educational materials in languages other than English;

*Own two or more American flags and participate in tawdry displays of excessive Americanism on Flag Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, and other patriotic holidays;

* Have knowingly registered or, perish the thought, voted Republican within the past 50 years;

*Failed to vote for Barack Obama and/or are among those who disapprove of his incompetent, biased, dangerous presidency;

*Are Caucasian, or look suspiciously like a Caucasian.

Please note that this checklist does not apply to African-Americans, Hispanics, Asians, or Native Americans because people from those racial and ethnic backgrounds are genetically incapable of being racists!


jwl

Are Religious Leaders Who Oppose Alabama’s New Immigration Law 'Culturally Backward'?

By John W. Lillpop

Alabama’s new immigration law combines common sense and rule of law in a manner that protects the rights and property of American citizens against assault by foreign illegal aliens. The measure is based on legitimate concerns involving home land security, unemployment among U.S. citizens, financial crisis in America, and preservation of American culture and language.

Those are not reason enough for some religious leaders who play the J word—Jesus—in opposing the law.

As reported, in part, at the reference:

“Some church groups are speaking out against Alabama's new law against illegal immigration, which they say violates Christian principles.

Leaders of the United Methodist Church, the Episcopal Church, the Lutheran Church and the Roman Catholic Church have all criticized the law as running counter to the Bible's teaching about loving others. Episcopal Bishop Henry N. Parsley of Birmingham calls its passage "a sad moment for our state."

The state's largest denomination, the Alabama Baptist Convention, hasn't taken a position publicly. But the latest edition of its widely read state newspaper, The Alabama Baptist, includes a front-page story that features Hispanic worries about the new law.
The Nevada-based Mormons issued a statement saying they are worried about tough state immigration statutes the day after Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley signed the law.”

Where, in the name of Jesus Christ, is concern for American citizens? Illegal aliens violate our borders, steal public services such as education, medical care, food, and shelter intended to provide a safety net for citizens.

Would Jesus support the invasion and occupation of a sovereign nation by millions of foreign aliens, invasions which cost taxpayers dearly, and which lead to deterioration of the established culture and language?

Did Jesus not counsel, “Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s”?

Is there not a Commandment among the Big 10 which forbids stealing?

Further, why are the churches not directly funding health care, education, etc. for illegal aliens rather than having those costs dumped on the back of taxpayers, where said cost exceeds $100 billion a year?

Question to those self-righteous hypocrites who oppose rule of law and basic fairness: What if legislation was passed to revoke the tax-exempt status of your institutions to fund the care and nurturing of illegal aliens?

Would your crying bleeding hearts be so compassionate if your pocket books were involved?


MSNBC host Chris Matthews recently used the term “culturally-backward Christians” to describe those whom were most bothered by the Anthony Weiner scandal.

His was dead wrong on that score, but his question may have application to how certain faiths come down on the side of invading criminals.

The question, “Are religious leaders who oppose common sense and rule of law when it comes to illegal aliens ‘Culturally backward’?”

Just asking.

Are Religious Leaders Who Oppose Alabama’s New Immigration Law 'Culturally Backward'?

http://www.necn.com/06/16/11/Churches-speaking-out-against-Ala-immigr/landing_politics.html?&blockID=3&apID=eb73ee282055466fae188d4fbb6df47b

Is a Presidential Pardon in the Offing for Weiner?

Although Anthony Weiner has yet to be charged with any crime(s) for his political boner and abuses via Twitter, it is just a matter of time before the law comes crashing down on the pathetic little weasel.


As luck would have it, Weiner’s need for divine intervention just happens to correspond quite nicely with Barack Obama’s desperate need for a post-Osama “bounce” in light of the dreadful employment numbers, crumbling economy, declining dollar, and other devastating impact of Obamanomics.

After flaking out on Israel so miserably recently, Obama also needs to mend fences with the Jewish community.

What better way to do that than by officially pardoning the weiner Weiner, one of the most prominent Jews in New York?

Weiner Thanks Parents for “Values”!

Weiner Thanks Parents for “Values”!




By John Lillpop

Anthony Weiner IS a sick, sick man.

To prove it, while giving his resignation speech, which brought to an end a scandalous career involving debauchery, exhibitionism, distribution of pornographic materials over the Internet, possible violations of law with respect to underage girls, and lord knows how many other federal, state, and local laws he may have violated, the deranged little man said:

“And I want to thank my mother and father for instilling in me the values that brought me this far.” (Paraphrase)

Thank them?

Good heavens, this wacko has just been forced to give up a position in the U.S. House, is headed for rehabilitation and may face felony charges and prison time!

A more appropriate response would have been for Weiner to Tweet Erick Holder and demand that his parents be arrested for child abuse! Attach those crotch shots as hard evidence, Mr. Weiner!

Texas State Senator to Bloke Giving Testimony in Spanish: SPEAK ENGLISH!

By John W. Lillpop

Why is it that so many Hispanics refuse to assimilate into American culture, even refusing to speak English?

Hispanics often deny that that is the case, but as stated at the link, in part, one Texas Congressman grew very angry at one Hispanic's Spanish testimony:

State Sen. Chris Harris (R-Arlington) spoke for many Americans when he interrupted the Spanish-language testimony of a citizen of 23 years against the Sanctuary Cities ban (SB9), to say it was "insulting" for the man not to speak English. This goes right to the heart of everything that is wrong with those who advocate for illegals and La Raza. The seperatism. The sense of entitlement. The contempt for our common language that prior immigrants always hurried to adopt. God bless you Sen. Harris for speaking for all of us!"

Indeed he does. Thank you Senator Harris.

America needs to make English the official language of the nation. Period!

Undeserved Heartbreak, Humiliation for Huma Abedin

By John W. Lillpop


Huma Abedin, the beautiful, sophisticated woman who is married to ex-Congressman Anthony Weiner, simply does not deserve the heartbreak and humiliation heaped upon her by as a result of the errant behavior of her perverted spouse.

Thank goodness Huma did not “stand by her man” as Weiner announced his resignation. This was to be Weiner’s day of judgment, at least two weeks late, and he deserved to stand alone in his moment of ultimate shame and defeat.

The U.S. House is better without Weiner and he deserves no pity or sympathy from anyone.

Huma Abedin, however, deserves all the support and help she can get, including prayer and sympathy.


May her God bless and keep her get through this tragic betrayal. And may the same blessings apply to the unborn baby that Huma carries in her womb.

Undeserved Heartbreak, Humiliation for Huma Abedin

While America Faces Economic Armageddon, Harry Reid Wants To Spend More on ILLEGALS!

By John W. Lillpop

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nevada) is reputed to have been quite the pugilist is his youth. Perhaps that explains his inexplicable obsession with rewarding people who have invaded our nation with special treatment and perks?

Harry Reid, friend of millions of illegal aliens with no moral or legal basis for being here. Harry Reid, enemy of U.S. sovereignty, the rule of law, secure borders and American citizens.


Was it a right-hook to the forehead that did you in Senator? A devastating knock-out punch that caused you to become a liberal Democrat and blithering malcontent who champions illegals over American citizens?

As reported at reference 1, Senator Reid is again stoking the fire of controversy by pandering to illegal aliens, especially Hispanics, for future votes.

At a time when America is on the brink on financial crisis, what with unsustainable deficit spending, high unemployment, record levels of bankruptcy and foreclosures, and a housing market more collapsed than during the Great Depression, why in the hell in this Democrat leader working on behalf of people who do even not belong here, and who already cost American taxpayers more than $110 billion a year?

Let’s be clear: Illegal aliens are ILLEGAL. They should not be here! America owes these people nothing except a one-way ticket back to Mexico or other third-world nation of origin!

Reid’s latest punch to the groin of American citizens is in marked contrast to what Reid was saying back in 1993 when
his office released the following statements (in bold) concerning illegal immigration:

“In response to increased terrorism and abuse of social programs by aliens, (I) today introduced the first and only comprehensive immigration reform bill in Congress. Currently, an alien living illegally in the United States often pays no taxes but receives unemployment, welfare, free medical care, and other federal benefits. Recent terrorist acts, including the World Trade Center bombing, have underscored the need to keep violent criminals out of the country.”

Reid’s bill, titled the “Immigration Stabilization Act,” overhauls the nation's immigration laws, and calls for a massive scale-down of immigrants allowed into the country. The bill also changes asylum laws to prevent phony asylum seekers.

Reid said the U.S. open door policy is being abused at the expense of honest, working citizens.

The senator continued:

"We are a country founded upon fairness and justice. An individual in real threat of torture or long-term incarceration because of his or her political beliefs can still seek asylum. But this bill closes the door to those who want to abuse America's inherent generosity and legal system.”

"Our borders have overflowed with illegal immigrants placing tremendous burdens on our criminal justice system, schools and social programs. The Immigration and Naturalization Service needs the ability to step up enforcement. Our federal wallet is stretched to the limit by illegal aliens getting welfare, food stamps, medical care, and other benefits often without paying any taxes.”

“Safeguards like welfare and free medical care are in place to boost Americans in need of short-term assistance. These programs were not meant to entice freeloaders and scam artists from around the world. Even worse, Americans have seen heinous crimes committed by individuals who are here illegally.”

Specific provisions proposed by the senator in the Immigration Stabilization Act include:

* Reduces annual legal immigration levels. Relatives other than spouse or minor children admitted only if already on immigration waiting lists and their admission does not raise annual immigration levels above approved level.

* Reforms asylum rules to prevent aliens from entering the United States illegally under phony "asylum" claims.

* Expands list of felonies considered "aggravated" felonies requiring exclusion and deportation of criminal aliens. Allows courts to order deportation at time of sentencing.

* Increases penalties for failing to depart or re-entering the United States after a final order of deportation order. Increases maximum penalties for visa fraud from five years to 10 years.

* Curtails alien smuggling by authorizing interdiction and repatriation of aliens seeking to enter the United States unlawfully by sea. Increases penalties for alien smuggling.

* Adds "alien smuggling" to the list of crimes subject to sanctions under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

* Expands the categories of property that are forfeited when used to facilitate the smuggling or harboring of illegal aliens.

* Clarifies that a person born in the United States to an alien mother who is not a lawful resident is not a U.S. citizen. This will eliminate incentive for pregnant alien women to enter the United States illegally, often at risk to mother and child, for the purpose of acquiring citizenship for the child and accompanying federal financial benefits.

* Mandates that aliens who cannot demonstrably support themselves without public or private assistance are excludable. This will prevent admission of aliens likely to be dependent on public financial support. This requirement extends to the sponsor of any family sponsored immigrant.

* Increases border security and patrol officer positions."

Senator Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced the Immigration Stabilization Act in the United States Senate in 1993. The statements quoted above are from a press release issued by Reid’s office on August 5, 1993.

How is it that Harry Reid was exactly right more than 18 years ago, but is so completely wrong now? Why does Reid oppose programs he once sponsored now that the problem is seven times greater after 9/11?

In the spring of 2006, while the U.S. Senate was debating legislation to make English the official U.S. language, Reid even saw fit to drag out the R word to slander those who supported the English bill.

And, of course, Reid has voted for Mexico and against America every time the U.S. Senate has considered amnesty.

Harry Reid: Against illegal immigration, before he was for it!

Why?



Reference 1
http://thehill.com/special-reports/immigration-june-2011/166425-senates-dream-act-is-win-win-for-immigrants-us

Ref 2: http://levin.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjJmNzE3MTg5MDJhYzM4OTM5OGMwOGM5ZTNhYzJlYmE

Open Letter to Under/Unemployed Americans: Barack Obama Owes You an Apology!

By John W. Lillpop


Dear Fellow American Citizens:

President Barack Obama and his Democrat party colleagues in Congress owe an apology to each and every Citizen who is unable to find work or whom is working below his/her capabilities.

For in your hour of need, this Administration and Congressional Democrats are actively working against you, perhaps unwittingly, but nonetheless with devastating consequences.

Barack Obama has never had to meet a payroll in his life. He simply does not understand, or respect, the fundamentals of free enterprise.

Even worse, Obama’s arrogance and hostility toward U.S. private enterprise is unprecedented in U.S. history.

This president, as well as most Democrats, believes that government creates good-paying, secure jobs. The fact is that private enterprise, and only private enterprise, can create job opportunities.

Barack Obama’s old-school liberalism has driven him to wage war against the very people who could, if not hindered by taxes and excessive regulation, create the high-paying jobs that every talented and ambitious American citizen deserves.

His non-stop rants against business and the Chamber of Commerce, in conjunction with his refusal to curb spending and face America’s debt crisis, are major reasons why business owners are reluctant to take risk and invest in new employees.

Barack Obama simply does not get it when it comes to business. In his warped way of thinking, business is bad, while greedy, corrupt labor unions are fine.

In Obama’s madness, the profit motive is always suspect. He apparently believes that government has a duty to use the tax code to “level the playing field” as it were, and to take from the “rich” in order to enrich the poor.

Barack Obama refuses to admit that government can best help the economy and the jobs situation by simply getting the hell out of the way and letting the barons of profit go to work!

Another example of Obama’s betrayal of American workers concerns his obsession on behalf of illegal aliens. Given his choice, Obama would grant amnesty to 12-20 million illegal aliens, with little or no regard for how that might impact American citizens struggling with employment issues.

Building the base of the Democrat Party by pandering to invaders who should not even be here is more important to Barack Obama than advocating of behalf of American citizens!

In 2009, Barack Obama saddled the American people with a “stimulus bill,” which cost nearly 1 trillion dollars. At the time that he signed the bill, President Obama promised that this bill would create or save 3-4 million American jobs.

Obama was so convinced that the stimulus was the right thing to do that he and fellow Democrats shoved the bill through will little or no debate. According to Obama, the economic crisis was too urgent to waste time on debate.

Three plus later, unemployment is still over 9 percent and the economy appears to be going from bad to worse, due in part to foolish spending like the stimulus bill.

Now, Obama declares that, “Recovery will take more time,” as the American people grow more and more frustrated with his failed economic policies.

Perhaps if he had taken an appropriate amount of time in 2009, America could have solved the vexing unemployment problem long ago.

Again, Barack Obama has been a full-time enemy of the under and unemployed American citizen.

His tenure must end in 2012—for your sake and that of the nation as a whole!

For Democrat Weiner, “Certitude” May Take More Than Two Weeks!

By John W. Lillpop


Anthony Weiner has been granted a two-week leave of absence from the U.S. House of Representatives to “become a better person, a better father” and on and on at a rehabilitation center following his pursuit of fame and glory for his private parts via Twitter.

Two weeks?

Good heavens it took longer than a fortnight to force the truth out of this weasel to begin with! How in the world can he hope to be “cured” and ready for work in just two weeks?

True, he would be returning to the Nancy Pelosi “House of ill repute” wing of the House where Democrats like Charles Rangel set the bar for morality, corruption, truth, and goodness so as to be all inclusive!

Which means that Weiner could probably sleep throughout rehab and still be ready to rejoin his Democrat colleagues and immediately fit right into Pelosi’s Culture of Debauchery and Corruption.

As reported, in part, at the link, it may take the demented Weiner YEARS not weeks to recover:

First came the crotch photos. Then came the lying and denial. Now, Rep. Anthony Weiner is seeking treatment for his misdeeds, leaving Washingtonians asking: treatment for what?

Based on the New York Democrat’s behavior, which the congressman says includes sending lewd messages and images over the Internet to six women in the past three years, experts interviewed by POLITICO said he could suffer from an array of conditions that could merit treatment, including narcissism, obsessive-compulsive disorder or even some variety of sexual addiction.

None of the possibilities comes with a silver-bullet treatment that delivers quick results — meaning that if Weiner is found to suffer from any of these conditions, he isn’t going to duck into a rehab center and emerge a week later with a doctor’s assurance that he is “cured,” cleared to return to Congress.
Instead, treatment requires weeks, months or even years of one-on-one therapy or group meetings, a slog through a 12-step program or perhaps even medication. It might be easy for a celebrity or politician caught in a scandal to say, “I’m getting help,” but if he really needs it — and wants it — it won’t be a breeze.

“He risked his career, his reputation and his recent marriage to engage in certain behavior while ignoring what the consequence may be,” said Sandra Davis, an addiction expert with Shady Side Psychotherapy Associates in Pittsburgh. “When someone chooses to do that, we say they are progressing down a long continuum of developing an addiction.”

Thus, the elusive “Certitude” that Weiner whined about at the start of Weinergate appears to be as elusive as ever!


Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/56866.html#ixzz1PGOkWD29

Charles Rangel Brilliant Defense of Weiner: “At least He Wasn’t going out With Little Boys!”

Charles Rangel Brilliant Defense of Weiner: “At least He Wasn’t Going out With Little Boys!”



By John W. Lillpop

Leave it to Charles Rangel, self-anointed moral ombudsman for the Democrat Party, to come up with an argument in favor of Anthony Weiner that may save the other disgraced New York Democrat from House banishment and perhaps worse.

Rangel’s brilliant argument, terse but tough, consisted of the following quotable quote, “At Least He(Weiner) didn’t go out with little boys!”


Hmmm.

Just how can you be sure, Charlie? Remember, the Weiner scandal started out as a third-rate hack job by a pervert, according to Weiner. It then escalated to an admitted bit of “foolishness” on Weiner's part, but not worthy of headline news or resignation.

The next shoe to drop was the news that Weiner was somehow involved, digitally, with a 17-year-old girl in Cyberspace chit chat, none of which was inappropriate or salacious.

According to Weiner, that is.

To say that Weiner’s recent record with respect to the truth is somewhat tainted would be akin to saying that Congress spends too much! The obvious is, well—too damn obvious.

Still, there is a bit of good news that Charlie could have used to defend the wayward Weiner: At least he did not cheat on his taxes!

What say ye, Charles?


Charles Rangel Brilliant Defense of Weiner: “At least He Wasn’t going out With Little Boys!”

Dark Skies Over San Jose: Mexican President Calderon Here!

By John W. Lillpop


Albeit, San Jose does not have the cleanest air in the nation.

Even so, the skies went dark and a foul odor, reminiscent of the days when this town was mostly about cow chips rather than silicon ones, permeate the air on this June day.

Flipping open the local rag for a hint as to what might be causing the nasty air disturbance, I found my answer on the first page: Mexican President Felipe Calderon is in town!

Nothing can pollute the air quicker and with such force as a visit from the president of that third-world, failed state known in genteel circles as Mexico.

And what, pray tell, brings the goofy beggar to San Jose on what would have otherwise been a beautiful day?

( ) Another rant about U.S. immigration law, especially that hideous encroachment into the comfort and well-being of Mexican illegal aliens just signed into law by the governor of Alabama?

() A strategy session with the ACLU, La Raza and other anti-American heretics (Democrats) on how to deal with excessive Americanism in Georgia, Indiana, Utah and other states FINALLY awakening to the fact that illegal aliens from Mexico are a financial and cultural disaster?

( ) To present a repayment plan to reimburse the U.S. for the $110 billion a year that American taxpayers waste on illegal aliens?

( ) To work on a suit to be filed in the world court against the U.S. Supreme Court for two recent rulings that went against illegal aliens and for U.S. citizens?

Alas, none of the above is the correct answer.

As it turns out, the bumbling Mexican is in San Jose seeking (begging) a loan for the completion of that border fence that is being built to keep poor invaders from Guatemala from invading Mexico!

Odd, that, you say. Why would the U.S. want to spend money on a border fence in Mexico when we need security at our own borders?

The answer is simple. Calderon is dealing with Congressional Democrats whom he knows are as dumb as Mexican field mice.

Thus, in his pitch to Senators Boxer and Feinstein and House Democrats, Calderon will claim that the only reason Mexico is building the fence is to keep unskilled, uneducated, poor Guatemalans from invading America via Mexico!

It’s all about American sovereignty, rule of law, and secure borders, don’t you see? If it were not for Mexico’s genuine concern for America and her taxpayers, every damn Guatemalan in the world would be free—even welcome-- to invade Mexico without the slightest fuss!

Out of the goodness of his heart, Calderon is willing to build that fence, provided his Yankee "useful idiots"—the Democrats—front him a billion.

Pesos, that is, the dollar is too unstable, don’t you know?

There you have it! With Mexico now being run by drug cartels and whore mongers, the President is free to roam the vast reaches of America, cup in hand, whilst bitching about our laws and culture.

A message seems appropriate to the delusional president:

Rather than fretting about how Americans administer the rule of law in America, focus your brilliant mind and boundless energy on fixing Mexico!

In other words, get your nose out of America’s business and keep it out!

Comprehende?

Dark Skies and Foul Odor in San Jose: President Felipe Calderon Here!

While Napolitano Calls Profiling of Muslims Illogical, TSA Focuses on Mentally Disabled!

By John W. Lillpop



The most serious challenge to America’s home land security is surely the “progressive” policies of the Obama Administration, particularly as articulated by Janet Napolitano, the leftist in whom President Obama has imprudently entrusted the well-being of over 300 million of we the people.

Secretary Napolitano once again defied common sense by declaring that the profiling of Muslim men under 35 was “illogical” as a tool for preventing terrorist attacks. She made her remarks at a forum on U.S. security and preventing terrorist attacks, as reported, in part, at reference 1.

While Big Sis was regaling forum attendees with her homeland security expertise, TSA agents in Detroit were headed in another direction as described, in part, at reference 2:

A Detroit father said agents with the Transportation Security Administration singled out his special-needs son for a pat-down while the family was headed to Disney World, MyFoxDetroit.com reported, an incident that the TSA admitted was a “case of bad judgment.”

David Mandy said agents at Detroit Metro Airport took his son Drew, 29, and asked him about the padding underneath his pants, which turned out to be adult diapers. Drew, who is severely mentally disabled, had trouble understanding the agents’ orders because his family said he has the mental capacity of a 2-year-old.

When the father tried to intervene and explain Drew’s disability, he said the two agents said, “Please, sir, we know what we’re doing.”

The agents confiscated a six-inch plastic hammer, something Drew had carried with him for 20 years for comfort. Agents called it a security threat, his father said, adding that they tapped the wall with it and said, “See, it’s hard. It could be used as a weapon.”

The family was told they’d have to ship the hammer if they wanted to keep it, David Mandy said.

“I understand they’re trying to keep people safe,” Mandy said told MyFoxDetroit.com. “But come on, does he look like a terrorist?”

In a statement to FoxNews.com, the TSA said it’s reviewing the incident but early findings indicate this was an “isolated case of bad judgment.” The TSA reached out to the Mandy family to apologize and said the man’s toy hammer should have never been confiscated.”

ISOLATED case of bad judgment?


In fact, with folks like Janet Napolitano running TSA, bad judgment is the rule, rather than the exception.

Another outrage that the American people need to “get used to,” Mr. President?




Ref 1
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2011/06/09/napolitano_no_logic_in_profiling_muslim_men_under_the_age_of_35.html



Ref 2
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpp/news/national/TSA-Admits-Bad-Judgment-After-Disabled-Man-Subjected-to-Airport-PatDown_54930533


Napolitano Calls Profiling of Muslims “Illogical,” TSA Focuses on Mentally Disabled!

In New York, Chris Lee Giveth, Anthony Weiner Taketh Away!

By John W. Lillpop


Just what the hell is going on with men in the US House from the state of New York? An obsession with removing one’s clothing, photographing one’s self (including private parts), and posting inappropriate photos on the Internet seems to have overwhelmed members from both parties.

First it was Christopher Lee, a Republican Representative of the 26th New York congressional district, who used the Internet and e-mails to circulate a bare-chested photo of himself.

Lee’s lack of discretion forced him to resign from the House, which then led to a special election on May 24 in which Democrat Kathy Hochul emerged the winner. That result was touted as a referendum of Paul Ryan’s proposed budget cuts and was celebrated by Democrats far and wide.

The Dem celebration included disgusting displays of chortling and gloating.

Then another New York member of the House was discovered to be lacking even a smidgen of modesty. Thus began the “Weinergate” scandal involving Anthony Weiner, a Democrat, who exposed much more of himself than a bare chest.

Weiner as it turns out photographed his genitals and, for whatever reason, decided that his Junk was worthy of Tweeting.

Unlike the Republican Lee, Democrat Weiner has refused to resign although several prominent Democrats have urged him to do so.

Instead, Weiner has decided to request a leave of absence so that he can go through rehabilitation and become a better person, husband, blah, blah, blah.

Meanwhile, all of the chortling and gloating from the Left has been replaced with horror, anger, and denial over Weiner's insane self-promotion.

Even second-rate brains like those that operate Nancy Pelosi and Debbie Wasserman Schultz have concluded that Weiner's exploits are a bit more serious than just a "personal matter" and that his tenure in the U.S. House is untenable.

The last straw seems to have been the revelation that Weiner had engaged a 17-year-old girl in several on-line conversations, although he insists that nothing inappropriate or untoward was discussed.

Just a few days ago, however, Weiner was trying to convince the world that a hacker had invaded his Twitter account and sent out a crotch shot which may or may not have been Weiner himself.

Even dim bulbs like Pelosi and Wasserman could see through Weiner's inanity when an underage teen was being interviewed by police.

Pity poor Democrats. Chris Lee gave so very much, all of which was whisked off the table by the impulsive exhibitionist Anthony Weiner!

Open Letter To Mexican President Felipe Calderon: Undocumented Boomers Headed to Mexico!

Satire By John W. Lillpop


An Open Letter To Mexican President Felipe Calderon


Dear President Calderon:

As you are no doubt aware, America the Great is quickly becoming America the Gray. The so-called "boomer" generation, comprised of scores of million of Americans, will soon reach retirement age.

As they age, America's boomers yearn for a less frantic pace---and a lifestyle that allows one to pause and smell the roses now and again.

In other words, boomers are looking for the "Good Life" which is supposed to accrue to those who work 45 years, pay ungodly amounts in taxes, raise a family, put children through college, and baby-sit the grandchildren.

Unfortunately, the United States is no longer as hospitable as it once was to graying citizens, especially now that our economy has collapsed.

As a result, boomers have decided to move to your beloved Mexico.

Knowing that the Mexican government is a strong supporter of open borders and liberal immigration policies, as least with respect to migrations from Mexico to America, boomers anticipate that their needs and wishes will be fully accommodated with minimal interference and bureaucratic hassle.

In plain English, boomers expect to be treated like upscale Mexican citizens, with all the perks and advantages attendant thereto.

Incidentally, we prefer to be called "undocumented boomers."

President Calderon, I am delighted to announce that just in time for summer millions of undocumented American boomers are headed to Mexico!

Viva America!

Current plans call for about 500,000 boomers to cross the border into Mexico each month.

As with any complex transition, there are several "ground rules" that must be followed in order to make this change seamless.

Accordingly, your attention is directed to the following:

* Mexican sovereignty, borders, and immigration laws are essentially null and void with respect to undocumented boomers. No attempt should be made to enforce said restrictions on good hearted, formerly hard working Americans.

* Undocumented boomers shall receive unlimited education, food, housing, legal assistance, and geriatric care on demand, the cost of which shall be borne solely by Mexican taxpayers.

* Mexican hospitals, medical clinics, and emergency rooms shall be obligated to meet the medical needs of all undocumented boomers, without regard to ability to pay.

This obligation shall not be limited or restricted in any way because of any real or projected negative impact on Mexico's medical systems, including the loss of vital services to Mexican citizens.

* Although undocumented boomers shall not be obligated to pay for medical services received, they shall be entitled to send $30-50 billion a year back to the United States with impunity. The Mexican government shall actively facilitate the transfer of such funds to America.

* English is the only language used by undocumented boomers; boomers have no desire or obligation to learn Spanish.

* America's historic free speech, free love, and anti-war revolutions originated with activists in the boomer generation.

In keeping with the boomer tradition of aggressive activism, from time to time it may be necessary for millions of boomers to take over the streets of Mexico's large cities in order to protest proposed new laws when the "rights" of undocumented boomers are in jeopardy.

During such protests, boomers will wave Old Glory and scream "Yes, we can!" and "We are Mexico!" in English, as they protest the rule of law.

All such activities are valid free speech expressions in a thriving Democracy. As a consequence, the Mexican government shall take no action to limit or impede protests by undocumented boomers.

* We Americans celebrate the 4th of July to commemorate our independence from Great Britain. Undocumented boomers prefer to conduct business as normal on May 5 and September 16, and to reserve the 4th of July for fireworks, BBQs, and displaying Red, White, and Blue everywhere.

* Undocumented boomers shall be licensed to drive without regard to immigration status. All driver instruction and testing materials shall be in English.

* Blood relatives of undocumented boomers shall be eligible for the same reduced tuition rates offered to Mexican students in the nation legally. Immersion for the purpose of teaching Spanish is a failed concept and shall not even be attempted.

* Undocumented boomers shall be eligible to vote in Mexican elections without any requirement to prove identity.

* Grandchildren of undocumented boomers born in Mexico shall be Mexican citizens by virtue of their birth, regardless of the immigration status of their parents and grand parents, and

* Undocumented boomers are very sensitive and are easily offended. Therefore, Mexicans shall refrain from using terms like "illegal alien," "Red Neck," "Cracker,"or "Gringo" when addressing or discussing boomers.

In closing, Mr. President, let me assure you that undocumented boomers will attempt to do for Mexico what 38 million Mexican illegal aliens are currently doing to America!

With best regards and wishes for a diverse and free Mexico!


John Lillpop
San Hose, California