Barack Obama’s Historic Plan to Reduce the Deficit

Satire by John W. Lillpop


President Obama has finally responded to the fiscal crisis confronting America by offering concrete, verifiable actions to cut costs and stem the growth of big government. In the words of the White House team, the president has “bitten the bullet” in proposing actions which will put America’s financial house in order and preserve our cherished heritage and tradition for generations to follow.

Overall, Obama’s plans will cut more than $5 trillion dollars from the deficit while reinforcing this nation’s commitments to peace and equal rights for all.

The president’s blueprint for a deficit-neutral federal government includes the following big-ticket items:


1. Do not invade or otherwise engage Iran or North Korea in war

2. Eliminate expenses related to Defense of Marriage Act

3. Do not secure border with Mexico or enforce immigration laws to remove illegal aliens

4. Hire 16,000 lower-level IRS agents to enforce ObamaCare

5. End the Bush war in Iraq (Do not ask about Afghanistan or Libya!)

According to White House insiders, these steps alone will account for over three trillion dollars in savings over the next twelve years.

The remaining two trillion dollars will be achieved by a well- structured plan to redistribute wealth from under taxed millionaires and billionaires millions to poor people of color who neither work nor pay taxes, but all of whom require housing, education, food, health care, pensions and other government entitlements.

One footnote to the President’s plan is noteworthy: It reads: This manifesto is subject to the election of progressives to the White House and Congress over the next two decades. Null and void if any conservative wrongfully elected to the presidency.

For this wisdom and purity of thought, America owes a deep debt of gratitude to President Obama for his historic abandonment of partisan ideology in favor of doing what is best for all Americans!

Why Not Furlough (Permanently) Non-Essential Government Leeches?

By John W. Lillpop


As President Obama and other Marxists in government despair Republican “extremist” plans to actually cut spending, one wonders why in the world no one is shouting out to cut the hundreds of thousands (or millions) of leeches on the government payroll?

That would be those “non-essential” employees who would have been sent home if the government had shut down.

Just why in Hades is ANY non-essential employee on the payroll?

By the way Senator Schumer, a money-grubbing leech is far more destructive than a Tea Party flea!

Obama’s “Vision” for America

By John W. Lillpop


President Obama is scheduled to deliver a major speech this day to address his “Vision” for bringing the federal deficit under control.

That is like asking Islamofascists afflicted with Jihad to forsake beheadings in order to get along better with infidels, especially Jews.

In other words, it ain’t gonna happen!

All of which underscores the fact that Barack Obama has learned exactly NOTHING from the last election cycle. In his arrogant, belligerent way of thinking, millions of perfectly intelligent independent voters suddenly went dumb last November.

Thus, Obama will propose to quell the deficit tsunami with the old-fashioned progressive formula of higher taxes. Spending cuts, if any, will be limited to defense and other “non-essential” budget items.

Obama’s vision for America? Think Ireland, Greece, and other bankrupt European nations.

Here is a thought: The president presumably had a list of “non-essential” government workers ready to furlough if the government shut down.

Why not fire ALL non-essential employees immediately?

With a 14 trillion dollar deficit, that makes more sense that raising taxes!

Why Waste Taxpayer Treasure to Stop Muslims from Killing Muslims?

By John W. Lillpop


In the name of all that is good and holy, why in the hell is our dim-witted president wasting billions of taxpayer dollars in order to prevent seventh-century savages in Libya from slaughtering each other?

I speak of the 162+ Tomahawk Missiles, at $1.5 million per. fired into Libya in order to stop wild-man Ghadaffhi from butchering rebels who have revolted against his 42-year reign of terror.

Why not save those Missiles for a later date and for a cause which has even a vague national interest for America?

After all, the Libyan “rebels” are nothing but a gathering of hooligans and Al-Quaeda want-to-be thugs. Does Obama really believe that these miscreants are freedom-loving heroes lusting for democracy, equal rights, and all of that?

Come on, Barack, the “rebels” hate democracy as much as Ghadaffhi himself, owing their full allegiance to Islam, that “Religion of Peace” farce.

Since when did Islam represent equal rights for women, gays, and other minorities? Since when did Islam respect human life and the right of dissent?

Save those Missiles, Mr. President, for the day, sure to come, when they will be needed to silence Islamofascists in nations where legitimate American interests will need defending.

Obama's "Humanitarian" War to Cause Major Earthquake in America?

By John W. Lillpop

Although President Obama and his loyalists proudly point to the thousands of lives saved in Libya by firing more than 180 cruise missiles into the distressed land, there are those who believe that Obama’s illegal and unconstitutional war will ultimately bring great pain and suffering to America.

Foremost among those warning of dire circumstances in retribution for Obama’s missile mania is Minister Louis Farrakhan, leader of the Nation of Islam.

As reported at the reference, Farrakhan said, in part:

“Destruction could be on America's doorstep because it oppresses “God's chosen people,” said Louis Farrakhan who defended Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi today, calling the U.S. action in Libya hypocrisy.


“A major earthquake is on the way to you and me and us,” he said. “Death and destruction is at the door of all of us, and we are worse prepared than the Japanese.”

Farrakhan cautioned Obama that he was being used as a pawn to oppress his own people in Africa. He insisted several times that Jews controlled the media and pressured Obama to take so-called humanitarian action in Libya, but not in other places such as the Gaza Strip.

“The stupid mistake we make is assuming the president is the supreme power,” Farrakhan said. “The mad dogs are growling and grinding in Washington, D.C.,” referring to one of Gadhafi's nicknames, “Mad Dog of the Middle East.”

Thank you, Minister Farrakhan, for that positive, upbeat take on the news. Sir.

However, one point needs clarification: Did you not declare that Obama was “selected before he was elected,” implying that a divine hand was present in guiding America’s president?

If so, how is it that Obama is being used as a “pawn” against his own African people?


http://www.chicagobreakingnews.com/news/local/chibrknews-farrakhan-defends-libyas-gadhafi-as-20110331,0,11191.story