By John W. Lillpop
Reverend Franklin Graham hit the nail on the head recently when he characterized Barack Obama as a “Son of Islam” who has persistently done more for Muslims during his term in office.
With his remarks, Graham earned the wrath of Obama, the NAACP and most Democrats who believe Obama when he says he is a Christian.
These are the same dolts who swallow the story that Obama was born in Honolulu and is, therefore, eligible to serve as president. And the same clowns who believe that school busing works, that a higher minimum wage helps the poor when the exact opposite is true, and the same dim wits who believe that the overall cost of health care can be reduced by adding 30 million people to the insured rolls.
As they say, you can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, etc., etc., but that is true only when dealing with intellectually-challenged Democrat voters.
‘Tis far more challenging, however, to sell recycled snake oil to a clever Jew when it comes to believing Obama.
For example, when Obama said to Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu “There should not be a shred of doubt by now: when the chips are down, I have Israel’s back,” it took every ounce of discipline at Netanyahu’s disposal to resist quoting South Carolina Representative Joe Wilson who blurted, “You Lie!” during the 2009 State of the Union delivered by The One.
And when you think about it, the point is an excellent one: Why Would a Shrewd Jew Believe a “Son of Islam” Who Says, “I Got Your Back?”
8.3.12
Is Obama’s “Blind Eye” Causing Deaths in Syria?
By John W. Lillpop
To say that Barack Hussein is inconsistent, illogical and unduly political when making vital decisions is an understatement of epic proportions.
For example, nearly one year ago, on March 29, 2011, President Obama addressed the nation and unleashed a blast of his world-class, soaring rhetoric to justify military action in Libya, a nation in conflict, but where said conflict did not involve any national interest, direct or indirect, of these United States.
At the time (see reference) Obama invoked moral consciousness as reason enough to shoot 160 or so Tomahawk Missiles into Libya at a cost of nearly one billion dollars to American taxpayers.
Further, because the President acted without approval of the U.S. Congress, his a action was a violation of the War Powers Act and probably an impeachable offense were it not for Harry Reid and like-minded gangsters “serving” the nation as Democrats in the U.S. Senate.
Obama’s exact words from that date:
Hmmm.
One year later, one wonders where the Obama concern for “slaughter and mass graves” is with respect to the carnage in Syria, where the UN estimates at least 7,500 innocent Syrians have been murdered by the brutal regime of President Assad?
Of course, that was then, and this is now.
In 2011, there were no U.S. elections on the horizon to fret about, although Team Obama was already in campaign mode, and was looking to advance the notion that Obama was strongly committed to rooting out tyranny in the name of Democracy and individual liberty.
However in 2012, with elections just months away, Obama knows that the nation is weary of spending American blood and treasure
on wars in Muslim nations.
Still, the question deserves to be asked: Is Obama’s “Blind Eye” Causing Deaths in Syria?
http://griid.org/2011/03/29/obama%E2%80%99s-justification-for-bombing-libya/
To say that Barack Hussein is inconsistent, illogical and unduly political when making vital decisions is an understatement of epic proportions.
For example, nearly one year ago, on March 29, 2011, President Obama addressed the nation and unleashed a blast of his world-class, soaring rhetoric to justify military action in Libya, a nation in conflict, but where said conflict did not involve any national interest, direct or indirect, of these United States.
At the time (see reference) Obama invoked moral consciousness as reason enough to shoot 160 or so Tomahawk Missiles into Libya at a cost of nearly one billion dollars to American taxpayers.
Further, because the President acted without approval of the U.S. Congress, his a action was a violation of the War Powers Act and probably an impeachable offense were it not for Harry Reid and like-minded gangsters “serving” the nation as Democrats in the U.S. Senate.
Obama’s exact words from that date:
“Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different. And as president, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action.”
Hmmm.
One year later, one wonders where the Obama concern for “slaughter and mass graves” is with respect to the carnage in Syria, where the UN estimates at least 7,500 innocent Syrians have been murdered by the brutal regime of President Assad?
Of course, that was then, and this is now.
In 2011, there were no U.S. elections on the horizon to fret about, although Team Obama was already in campaign mode, and was looking to advance the notion that Obama was strongly committed to rooting out tyranny in the name of Democracy and individual liberty.
However in 2012, with elections just months away, Obama knows that the nation is weary of spending American blood and treasure
on wars in Muslim nations.
Still, the question deserves to be asked: Is Obama’s “Blind Eye” Causing Deaths in Syria?
http://griid.org/2011/03/29/obama%E2%80%99s-justification-for-bombing-libya/
7.3.12
Obama’s Naive Energy Solution: Let Them Pump Algae!
By John W. Lillpop
Whether or not to fill one’s automobile with gas used to be a relatively simple decision. If the needle said E or close to E, you filled the damn tank and moved on.
However, with Barack Obama and Steven Chu (Obama’s Anti-energy guru) in charge, “filling it up” requires an advanced degree in economics to assure that one is making the most prudent decision without threatening the kids’ education, retirement plans, health care options, and other major areas of life that need proper fiscal attention and discipline.
This outrageous conundrum is yet another example of big -government Marxism gone amuck, where elitist bureaucrats work 24/7 to get Americans out of their automobiles, ostensibly to end the nation’s reliance on oil.
Especially foreign oil, like that which comes from unstable Middle-Eastern nations where terrorism is the only commodity that exceeds petroleum when it comes to exports.
Just to be safe, the Obama-Chu war on energy has been expanded to include non-Middle East nations which are not officially designated as sponsors of terrorism, but which arouse progressive suspicions none the less.
Like Canada and the Keystone Pipeline which, had it not been for Obama, would have put 20,000 Americans back to work in an economy all but devastated by out-of-control spending, massive deficits, and the incoherent and incompetent meddling of a naïve Marxist who has never balanced a budget in his entire life, and who finds the very notion of limited spending to be racist and Anti-American!
Thus, while middle-class Americans face the looming threat of $5 a gallon gasoline, or worse, the Obama “progressive” energy strategy is: “Let them pump algae!”
Algae?
Just how in the hell is algae supposed to help the unemployed plumber in Los Angeles who needs to drive 10 miles for a job interview, but cannot afford the gasoline needed to motor him to the first employment nibble he has had in seven months?
Of course, left-wing elitists like Obama and Chu do not concern themselves with mundane issues like the price of gasoline.
Indeed, out-of-touch elitists are so shielded from the realities of life that $5 or $6 a gallon gasoline is important only when it is perceived as being a significant threat to the president’s approval ratings and re-election prospects!
Obama and the Democrats: “Party of the Little Guy”?
Don’t be silly!
Whether or not to fill one’s automobile with gas used to be a relatively simple decision. If the needle said E or close to E, you filled the damn tank and moved on.
However, with Barack Obama and Steven Chu (Obama’s Anti-energy guru) in charge, “filling it up” requires an advanced degree in economics to assure that one is making the most prudent decision without threatening the kids’ education, retirement plans, health care options, and other major areas of life that need proper fiscal attention and discipline.
This outrageous conundrum is yet another example of big -government Marxism gone amuck, where elitist bureaucrats work 24/7 to get Americans out of their automobiles, ostensibly to end the nation’s reliance on oil.
Especially foreign oil, like that which comes from unstable Middle-Eastern nations where terrorism is the only commodity that exceeds petroleum when it comes to exports.
Just to be safe, the Obama-Chu war on energy has been expanded to include non-Middle East nations which are not officially designated as sponsors of terrorism, but which arouse progressive suspicions none the less.
Like Canada and the Keystone Pipeline which, had it not been for Obama, would have put 20,000 Americans back to work in an economy all but devastated by out-of-control spending, massive deficits, and the incoherent and incompetent meddling of a naïve Marxist who has never balanced a budget in his entire life, and who finds the very notion of limited spending to be racist and Anti-American!
Thus, while middle-class Americans face the looming threat of $5 a gallon gasoline, or worse, the Obama “progressive” energy strategy is: “Let them pump algae!”
Algae?
Just how in the hell is algae supposed to help the unemployed plumber in Los Angeles who needs to drive 10 miles for a job interview, but cannot afford the gasoline needed to motor him to the first employment nibble he has had in seven months?
Of course, left-wing elitists like Obama and Chu do not concern themselves with mundane issues like the price of gasoline.
Indeed, out-of-touch elitists are so shielded from the realities of life that $5 or $6 a gallon gasoline is important only when it is perceived as being a significant threat to the president’s approval ratings and re-election prospects!
Obama and the Democrats: “Party of the Little Guy”?
Don’t be silly!
Romney-Palin Would Trounce Obama-Biden!
By John W. Lillpop
With Mitt Romney edging ever closer to the Republican nomination, speculation will soon center on the best choice for a candidate to join the ticket as the nominee for Vice-President.
Pundits have already floated the names of Rick Santorun, Ron Paul, Marco Rubio, and countless others for the honor. Criteria include a warrior who can appeal to independents, Tea Party members, and one who can help balance the perception of Romney as too much of a centrist.
When it comes to photgenic appeal and good looks, there is one possible team that tops them all and that would be Governor Romney and Governor Palin!
Palin would bring strong conservative credentials and executive experience from her gig as Governor of Alaska to the ticket as well as striking beauty.
Romney-Palin would be the most attractive political couple on the planet and would be perfect for the conservative "Occupy Washington" movement.
This dog can hunt folks!
6.3.12
In Rush Vs. Fluke Fray, Insanity Prevails-- As Usual!
By John W. Lillpop
Like starving sharks driven to frenzy by the sight and sweet smell of fresh blood in the water, liberal Democrats and left-wing moon bats masquerading as journalists are circling the studios of superstar Rush Limbaugh in anticipation of being able to silence dissent and the inconvenience of opposing views, once and for all.
For his “intemperate” remarks about Sandra Fluke, Rush is being portrayed as a despicable, woman-hating misogynist whose First Amendment rights to free speech should be permanently revoked, with no chance for reinstatement.
According to the left, Rush should be kicked off the air ways as compensation to Fluke, the 30-year-old parasite-Marxist, who believes that American tax payers should bear the financial burden for protecting her from the unintended consequences of her own sexual behavior.
Imagine that. An allegedly educated woman who, at the ripe old age of 30, actually believes that her sexual experiences, whatever they might be, should be unwritten by middle-class Americans who are struggling to make mortgage payments, fund education for their offspring, and plan for retirement, all the while trying to survive the withering economy brought to us by the failed Obama presidency.
Speaking of Obama, the fellow who should be working 24/7 to fix the economy that he ruined, who should be working to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear threat, and who should be tending to a a host of other vital issues, found time to join the Limbaugh-Fluke fray by placing a personal call to the abused 30-year-old in order to reassure the young thang that the government is ready and able to take care of her from cradle to grave, including picking up the tab for her ‘reproduction prevention’ needs.
Never mind that 45 million Americans are on food stamps, that Social Security is going broke, millions face foreclosure and bankruptcy, and that the federal deficit is fast approaching 16 TRILLION dollars.
None of that really matters, Sandra, as long as YOUR needs are being met.
Oh, and do not forget to register (Democrat, of course!) and by all means vote in November!
By the way, does anyone remember if Obama placed a comforting call to conservative radio personality Laura Ingraham when she was called a “slut” by MSNBC’s Ed Schultz?
Just asking.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)