Should Abortions Be Banned During the 2010 Census?

By John W. Lillpop

Participating in the once- in-a- decade invasion of my privacy known as the census has always been a source of chaffing irritation. The questions are intrusive, stupid, and, frankly, none of the government's damn business.

What is my income? Am I married? My age? How many dependents?

Good grief, I file an IRS return every April and from that return one can determine my income, marital status, number of dependents, home ownership status and on and on, and on. Why bother me every ten years with a long list of stupid questions that Uncle Sam already has the answers to?

Even more distressing is the politicization of the census.

Case in point: In one of the most incredible instances of bureaucratic bumbling in our history, the US Census Bureau requested that deportation of illegal aliens be suspended during the 2010 census.

As reported at the link below, in part:

http://papastraighttalk.blogspot.com/2007/08/census-bureau-cancels-deportation-in.html

"WASHINGTON - The Census Bureau wants immigration agents to suspend enforcement raids during the 2010 census so the government can better count illegal immigrants.

"Raids during the population count would make an already distrustful group even less likely to cooperate with government workers who are supposed to include them, the Census Bureau's second-ranking official said in an Associated Press interview."
Imagine what framers of the Constitution would think of a government so warped and out of touch as to propose that the rule of law be suspended in order to do a census?

By the way, since the Census Bureau is in the business of stupid ideas, here is another: Why not outlaw abortions during the census so as to get an accurate count?

Logically, that would never fly because hard-core leftists assign more worth to invading illegal aliens than to innocent babes.

In censuses gone by, most people simply shrugged off their concerns and answered all questions. That, the path of least resistance, was less stressful than stirring up a fuss about an issue that everyone was annoyed about, but not enough to do anything about.

That was then, this is now.

We the People used to have a grudging respect for the government, and we even trusted the rascals in Washington, D.C., to do pretty much the right thing. At least some of the time.

Things are much, much different now. America has been taken over by a president who seems to be intent on destroying our democracy and replacing it with a vile version of socialism.

He and like-minded liberals in Congress want government deeply involved in the intricate details and decisions that impact the lives of all Americans.

Obama's obsession with the census is hypocrisy on steroids, given his steadfast refusal to provide a valid birth certificate!

Under the oppressive liberalism now dominating the executive and legislative branches of government, important decisions that should be the exclusive domain of a free and independent people are being usurped by government bureaucrats whose only concern is the consolidation and preservation of their own power.

Consequently, the American people cannot trust the Obama administration or the Democrat-controlled Congress.


Good news! We are not alone, thanks to a courageous and wise Republican woman from Minnesota. As reported, in part, at the Washington Times:

http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/jun/17/exclusive-minn-lawmaker-fears-census-abuse/print/

"Outspoken Republican Rep. Michele Bachmann says she's so worried that information from next year's national census will be abused that she will refuse to fill out anything more than the number of people in her household.

"In an interview Wednesday morning with The Washington Times "America's Morning News," Mrs. Bachmann, Minnesota Republican, said the questions have become "very intricate, very personal" and she also fears ACORN, the community organizing group that came under fire for its voter registration efforts last year, will be part of the Census Bureau's door-to-door information collection efforts.

"I know for my family the only question we will be answering is how many people are in our home," she said. "We won't be answering any information beyond that, because the Constitution doesn't require any information beyond that."

Bravo to Representative Bachmann for giving credibility to an issue whose time is here and now.

The good Lady appears to have the US Constitution on her side given the language set forth in Constitution concerning the census:



"[An] Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct."

Enumeration is defined as: To determine the number of; count.

Nothing in there about determining the racial composition of your household, the educational levels of you and your family, foreign languages spoken, or any of the other intrusive questions posed by otherwise unemployable bean counters.

Representative Bachmann has identified a cause that could rival the "Tea Party" uprising in relevance.

How about a national campaign to encourage American patriots to answer one, and only one, question in the 2010 Census, that being, "How many people live here?"

Any inquiry beyond that is an unconstitutional invasion of privacy by the Obama administration and leftist thugs in the Congress.

Is North Korea Mocking President Obama?

By John W. Lillpop

North Korean wild man Kim Young Il seems intent on making VP Joe Biden into a seer, or person of extraordinary foresight, neither of which apply to the man.

Biden, it will be remembered, predicted a test of President Obama's mettle within six months of the inauguration.

That test seems to be coming to a location near the Hawaiian Islands for the 4th of July. As reported at Myway.com, in part:

"U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday that the military has set up additional defenses around Hawaii, consisting of a ground-based mobile missile system and a radar system nearby. Together they could shoot an incoming missile in mid air.

"Without telegraphing what we will do, I would just say ... we are in a good position, should it become necessary, to protect Americans and American territory," Gates told reporters in Washington. "

"Gates' comments come after Japan's Yomiuri newspaper reported that North Korea might test fire a Taepodong-2 missile with a range of up to 4,000 miles (6,500 kilometers), sometime around the U.S. holiday of Independence Day on July 4."

Gates' announcement immediately raises urgent questions about America's national defense:

1. Why is the Secretary of Defense dependent on a Japanese newspaper for critical intelligence information, which could have a direct and dramatic impact on America lives?

Has the Obama administration managed to neuter US intelligence capabilities so completely in just five months?


2. Why the need for setting up "additional defenses" around Hawaii? If the American State of Hawaii is not adequately protected all of the time, why not?

3. In light of North Korea's continued belligerence and that of Iran, why is this president seeking to back away from missile defense systems?

Why not an urgent escalation of Starwars to meet the threats present in the modern world?

Of course, Kim Young Il may simply be mocking President Obama by threatening to fire a missile at the president's home state.

However, who can be sure when dealing with the erratic and dangerous mad man of North Korea?

What Would YOU Call Barbara Boxer?

Satire by John W. Lillpop

As a resident of California and an American patriot to boot, I have had the honor and privilege of voting against Barbara Boxer on three separate occasions during her long and tragic career as a candidate for the U.S. Senate.

Over those many years, I confess to not even once thinking of Boxer as a legitimate "Senator," although I do have a number of other monikers for her, none of which can be published on a family web site.

Therefore, it was with particular interest that I read of Barbara Boxer's verbal sparring match with Army Corps of Engineers division leader, Brigadier General Michael Walsh.

As reported at politicsdaily.com, in part:

"At a sometimes contentious Capitol Hill hearing Tuesday, Senate Environment and Public Works Committee chairwoman, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA), had a request for Army Corps of Engineers division leader, Brigadier General Michael Walsh.

"During a terse exchange, as Boxer pressed Walsh on why the levees in New Orleans are still not repaired nearly four years after Hurricane Katrina, she said to Walsh:

"Could you say 'senator' instead of 'ma'am? It's just a thing. I worked so hard to get that title. I'd appreciate it."

The general's response? "Yes, Senator."

Brigadier General Walsh deserves high praise and kudos for the extraordinary restraint and respect he lavished on one of the most despicable leftists ever to sit in the U.S. Senate.

Had it been right-wing extremist John Lillpop answering the question, the response might have been slightly less polite and sans any trace of PC.

Given the opportunity, I might have chosen other, more appropriate responses like one of the following:

* Can I get back to you on that, Ma'am?

* I could, but I will not. But fret not, this little temper tantrum will get you plenty of sound bites on the evening news!

* Sorry, BB. I do not take orders from no stinkin' person what has to sit down to pee!

* How about a compromise: Grand dame?

* I would be happy to, if you will please first show me your birth certificate, ma'am.

* For a sawed off little feminist, ya got a lot of spunk, ain't ya?

* Does this mean that I should call that illegal alien in the White House "president?"

* I would, but for the fact that you seem to have a fetish about surrounding yourself with staff members who are also child pornographers.

Do the names Jeff P. Rosato and Bernie Ward ring a bell? What's with the perverts? Have you considered recruiting somewhere other than 'Frisco, ma'am?


Of course, any one of those replies would have caused me to be arrested immediately and charged with the felony crime of flagrant truth telling and hateful and excessive transparency.

Which would deny me the chance to vote against Boxer a fourth time in 2010.

What would YOU call Barbara Boxer?

"Undocumented Boomers" Head to Mexico!

Satire By John W. Lillpop

An Open Letter To Mexican President Felipe Calderon


Dear President Calderon:

As you are no doubt aware, America the Great is quickly becoming America the Gray. The so-called "boomer" generation, comprised of approximately 40 million Americans, will soon reach retirement age.

As they age, America's boomers yearn for a less frantic pace---and a lifestyle that allows one to pause and smell the roses now and again.

In other words, boomers are looking for the "Good Life" which is supposed to accrue to those who work 45 years, pay ungodly amounts in taxes, raise a family, put children through college, and baby-sit the grandchildren.

Unfortunately, the United States is no longer as hospitable as it once was to graying citizens, especially now that our economy has collapsed.

As a result, boomers have decided to move to your beloved Mexico.

Knowing that the Mexican government is a strong supporter of open borders and liberal immigration policies, as least with respect to migrations from Mexico to America, boomers anticipate that their needs and wishes will be fully accommodated with minimal interference and bureaucratic hassle.

In plain English, boomers expect to be treated like upscale Mexican citizens, with all the perks and advantages attendant thereto.

Incidentally, we prefer to be called "undocumented boomers."

President Calderon, I am delighted to announce that 40 million undocumented American boomers are headed to Mexico!

Viva America!

Current plans call for about 500,000 boomers to cross the border into Mexico each month.

As with any complex transition, there are several "ground rules" that must be followed in order to make this change seamless.

Accordingly, your attention is directed to the following action items:

* Mexican sovereignty, borders, and immigration laws are essentially null and void with respect to undocumented boomers. No attempt should be made to enforce said restrictions on good hearted, formerly hard working Americans.

* Undocumented boomers shall receive unlimited education, food, housing, legal assistance, and geriatric care on demand, the cost of which shall be borne solely by Mexican taxpayers.

* Mexican hospitals, medical clinics, and emergency rooms shall be obligated to meet the medical needs of all undocumented boomers, without regard to ability to pay.

This obligation shall not be limited or restricted in any way because of any real or projected negative impact on Mexico's medical systems, including the loss of vital services to Mexican citizens.

* Although undocumented boomers shall not be obligated to pay for medical services received, they shall be entitled to send $30-50 billion a year back to the United States with impunity. The Mexican government shall actively facilitate the transfer of such funds to America.

* English is the only language used by undocumented boomers; boomers have no desire or obligation to learn Spanish.

* America's historic free speech, free love, and anti-war revolutions originated with activists in the boomer generation.

In keeping with the boomer tradition of aggressive activism, from time to time it may be necessary for millions of boomers to take over the streets of Mexico's large cities in order to protest proposed new laws when the "rights" of undocumented boomers are in jeopardy.

During such protests, boomers will wave Old Glory and scream "Yes, we can!" and "We are Mexico!" in English, as they protest the rule of law.

All such activities are valid free speech expressions in a thriving Democracy. As a consequence, the Mexican government shall take no action to limit or impede protests by undocumented boomers.

* We Americans celebrate the 4th of July to commemorate our independence from Great Britain. Undocumented boomers prefer to conduct business as normal on May 5 and September 16, and to reserve the 4th of July for fireworks, BBQs, and displaying Red, White, and Blue everywhere.

* Undocumented boomers shall be licensed to drive without regard to immigration status. All driver instruction and testing materials shall be in English.

* Blood relatives of undocumented boomers shall be eligible for the same reduced tuition rates offered to Mexican students in the nation legally. Immersion for the purpose of teaching Spanish is a failed concept and shall not even be attempted.

* Undocumented boomers shall be eligible to vote in Mexican elections without any requirement to prove identity.

* Grandchildren of undocumented boomers born in Mexico shall be Mexican citizens by virtue of their birth, regardless of the immigration status of their parents and grand parents, and

* Undocumented boomers are very sensitive and are easily offended. Therefore, Mexicans shall refrain from using terms like "illegal alien," "Red Neck," "Cracker,"or "Gringo" when addressing or discussing boomers.

In closing, Mr. President, let me assure you that undocumented boomers will attempt to do for Mexico what 38 million Mexican illegal aliens are currently doing to America!

With best regards and wishes for a diverse and free Mexico!


John Lillpop
San Hose, California

As to Sammy Sosa: How Do You Say "Perjury" In Spanish?

By John W. Lillpop

Samuel Peralta Sosa, known to bleacher bums at Wrigley Field and throughout baseball yards all across America as "Sammy," was one heck of a ball player.

Over the course of a major league career that lasted nearly 20 years with four different clubs, Sosa hit 609 homer runs, drove in 1667 runs, and boasted a very fine lifetime batting average of .273.

Besides being a great ball player, Sosa understood that his role was not limited to swatting a ball over a fence and lumbering around the bases.

He understood that baseball is all about entertaining a bleacher section full of beer-blasted fans who shell out $20, or more, just to watch 50 spoiled-brat millionaires in their 20s and 30s play what has been charitably described as a "kid's game."

Successfully smiting a round ball with a round bat hurled at close to 100 miles per hour while said ball is curving is a rare talent.

But one must also bring pizzazz and personality to the field. Sammy Sosa oozed pizzazz and was a terrific actor, which made him a fan favorite.

Sosa's acting skills came in handy back in 2005 when he appeared at a Congressional hearing looking into drugs in major league baseball.

Looking overwhelmed by all those white Republicans glaring down at him, Sosa even went so far as to have his attorney read the following statement:


"To be clear, I have never taken illegal performance-enhancing drugs. I have never injected myself or had anyone inject me with anything. I have not broken the laws of the United States or the laws of the Dominican Republic. I have been tested as recently as 2004, and I am clean."

That sworn testimony was delivered on Sosa's behalf, ostensibly because of his limited English skills.

As it turns out, Sammy Sosa may not be quite the powerful actor he supposes himself to be.

As reported, in part, at SI.com:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/baseball/mlb/06/17/sosa.congress.ap/index.html?eref=si_topstories

"WASHINGTON (AP) -- A congressional committee will look into former baseball slugger Sammy Sosa's denial that he used illegal performance-enhancing drugs in light of a report that he tested positive for a performance-enhancing drug in 2003.

"The chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, Democratic Rep. Edolphus Towns of New York, says that the committee takes seriously suggestions that a witness had been misleading.

"Towns said in a statement Wednesday that he will determine the appropriate steps following a review of the matter.

"In 2005, Sosa told Congress that he had never taken illegal performance-enhancing drugs. The New York Times reported Tuesday that Sosa tested positive."

Oooooooooops!

Two questions immediately come to mind:

Can a defendant claim innocence by alleging that his attorney mistranslated his testimony while converting Spanish to English?

And, "How Do You Say Perjury In Spanish?"