29.10.12

Another Foreign Scalawag Backs Obama





By John W. Lillpop


While Republican Mitt Romney continues to surge among American voters and politicians, Barack Obama continues to attract communists, near communists, and dictators from foreign lands.

As reported at the reference, the French Prime Minister joined the ranks of despicable scalawags like Vladimir Putin, Hugo Chavez, and Fidel Castro to voice support for the befuddled Obama:

French Prime Minister Jean-Marc Ayrault has broken with diplomatic protocol by openly expressing his hope that Barack Obama wins the upcoming US presidential election.

"If I was an American citizen I wouldn't hesitate to vote for Obama," he told a radio interviewer on Wednesday.

While it is hardly surprising that Ayrault, a Socialist, would support the Democrat candidate in a US election, prudence normally restricts politicians from making such remarks given the possibility they will end up having to deal with their Republican rivals.”


A note to Ayrault: If YOU were an American citizen, you would realize that the “hope” of a frog politician is irrelevant in America, and may, in fact, help defeat America’s worst president in history!


http://www.worldmeets.us/lenouvelobservareur000003.shtml#axzz2AgnauoYB

28.10.12

America's Move to "Post-Racial" Era: Another Dismal Failure by Barack Obama!





By John W. Lillpop


Barack Obama’s legacy is one of mostly unfulfilled promises, including:

( )Cut the federal deficit by one-half(He doubled it!)

( )Reduce unemployment to 6% (Stands at just below 8%)

( )Close GITMO

( )Reset relations with Russia (renewed cold war!)

( )Restore world respect for US (laughable!)

Obama also promised to usher in a “post-racial” era in order to bring Americans together.

The result? Another full- throated disaster for our president and America!

In the four years since Obama hijacked the Oval Office, racial tensions in America have grown more aggravated and the races are less tolerant of one another.

As reported:

"Racial attitudes have not improved in the four years since the United States elected its first black president, an Associated Press poll finds, as a slight majority of Americans now express prejudice toward blacks whether they recognize those feelings or not.

Those views could cost President Barack Obama votes as he tries for re-election, the survey found, though the effects are mitigated by some people's more favorable views of blacks.

Racial prejudice has increased slightly since 2008 whether those feelings were measured using questions that explicitly asked respondents about racist attitudes, or through an experimental test that measured implicit views toward race without asking questions about that topic directly.

In all, 51 percent of Americans now express explicit anti-black attitudes, compared with 48 percent in a similar 2008 survey. When measured by an implicit racial attitudes test, the number of Americans with anti-black sentiments jumped to 56 percent, up from 49 percent during the last presidential election. In both tests, the share of Americans expressing pro-black attitudes fell.

"As much as we'd hope the impact of race would decline over time ... it appears the impact of anti-black sentiment on voting is about the same as it was four years ago," said Jon Krosnick, a Stanford University professor who worked with AP to develop the survey.”

Notwithstanding the vaunted survey, two pertinent questions remain unanswered:

1. What about black racism? Why is there no critique of the fact that despite 14% unemployment among blacks, that demographic continues to register greater than 90% support for the black president?

2. Are the increases in negative views about blacks attributable, at least in part, to a failed presidency in which, among other things, the black president and Attorney General appear to harbor anti-white prejudice?

Perhaps the best way to improve race relations would be to remove the failed Barack Obama from power?

27.10.12

Hurricane Sandy to Drive Obama Failures, Scandals off Front Pages?




By John Lillpop


As new information concerning Barack Obama’s pandemic of failures and scandals surfaces daily, all of the momentum seems to favor Mitt Romney in the final days of the 2012 presidential sweepstakes.

However, an act of nature may make the path of the challenger more difficult, but still doable.

Specifically, as reported in the Public Advisory at the reference, this monster storm is expected to attack a large swath of the US east coast from FLORIDA THROUGH THE CAROLINAS FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF DAYS AND SPREAD INTO THE MID- ATLANTIC AND NORTHEASTERN STATES BY SUNDAY.

Estimates are that Sandy may inflict as much as $ 1 billion dollars in property damage and may result in serious injuries and deaths.

Given the projected impact of Sandy, it seems likely that the storm will dominate news coverage for several days next week, thereby pushing coverage of Obama’s high crimes and misdemeanors, as well as his brutal incompetence, off the front pages and BREAKING NEWS headlines.

In view of the refusal by the liberal media to cover topics like the slaughter in Benghazi and other stories that reflect poorly on Obama with any degree of objectivity, or at all, the overall impact of Sandy coverage may, in fact, not be all that great.

After all, 100 mile an hour winds, massive storm surges, catastrophic flooding, and nature at her worst pale in comparison to the bedlam and harm inflicted on a daily basis by the media which is, despite the past four years, still smitten with love for a Marxist community organizer who  hates America.

The big question: How can patriotic Americans pursue legal action against mainstream media for duplicity in the attempted destruction of the greatest society in human history?

26.10.12

Team Obama Trolls for Virgin Votes!


By John W Lillpop



In yet another dramatic lowering of the decency bar for the purpose of sheer political expediency, Team Obama is actively courting the “virgin” demographic for the November 6 brouhaha.

As reported:

President Obama's campaign is out with an eyebrow-raising new ad targeting young voters in which Lena Dunham, the creator of the HBO hit series 'Girls,' compares her first voting experience to losing her virginity.

'Your first time shouldn’t be with just anybody,' Dunham, 26, says in the ad. 'You want to do it with a great guy.'

Dunham goes on to explain that 'your first time' should be with 'someone who really cares about and understands women; A guy who cares whether you get health insurance and specifically whether you get birth control.'

'The consequences are huge,' she continues.

Dunham wraps up the Obama ad by describing her coming-of-age experience at the voting booth.

'It was this line in the sand,' she says. 'Before, I was a girl. Now, I was a woman. I went to the polling station, I pulled back the curtain, I voted for Barack Obama.'

Dunham has amassed a cult following among 20-somethings as the creator and starring actress in the HBO hit series, 'Girls.' She has been widely dubbed the 'voice of a generation' for her show's hilarious representation of life as a middle-to-upper-class millennial living in New York City.

The young star is one of many celebrities that the Obama campaign is calling on to try and reach and inspire young people, whose record-breaking turnout on Election Day four years ago was critical to Obama's victory in 2008. Obama needs similar turnout among young people on Election Day this year to win re-election.

Dunham's tongue-in-cheek references to losing her virginity are not lost on Republicans, many of whom say they are outraged by the ad and call it 'disgusting.'

'Talk about desperation,' a conservative blogger wrote on 'The Right Scoop.'

'They've finally sunken to a new low trying to get the youth vote by comparing voting for the first time to having sex for the first time.'

RedState editor-in-chief and CNN contributor Erick Erickson wrote, 'If you need any further proof we live in a fallen world destined for hell fire, consider the number of people who have no problem with the President of the United States, via a campaign ad, ridiculing virgins and comparing sex to voting.'

He said the only honest part of the ad is that Obama's 2008 supporters 'have been screwed -- economically.'

Fox News analyst and conservative author Monica Crowley called the ad 'sick' and 'degrading' on Twitter.


'Of the many sick things about this degrading Lena Dunham "lose your virginity to Barack" ad? The left thinks it's "empowering" to women,' she wrote.

Conservative blogger John Nolte of Breitbart News added: 'How could a president with two young, blossoming daughters release an ad as disgusting as this?'



This sick, disgusting ad can be viewed at the link below:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223316/Outrage-Girls-star-Lena-Dunhams-election-video-paid-presidents-campaign.html#ixzz2APrUFONJ



25.10.12

International Election Observers, Beware: Don’t Mess With Texas!



By John W. Lillpop


The idea that a gaggle of International Election Observers, no doubt quiche-eaters and Obama sycophants, would be allowed to “observe” the conduct of voting in the Great State of Texas is absurd, outrageous, communist and un-American rubbish inspired by foot soldiers for Satan, also known as Democrats.

As reported at the reference, Texas is fighting back and has advised dodo birds from abroad that they could be arrested for getting in the way of the greatest democratic institution in world history:

The report:

Texas authorities have threatened to arrest international election observers, prompting a furious response from the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE).

“The threat of criminal sanctions against [international] observers is unacceptable,” Janez Lenarčič, the Director of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), said in a statement.

“The United States, like all countries in the OSCE, has an obligation to invite ODIHR observers to observe its elections.”

Lawmakers from the group of 56 European and Central Asian nations have been observing U.S. elections since 2002, without incident. Their presence has become a flash point this year, however, as Republicans accuse Democrats of voter fraud while Democrats counter that GOP-inspired voter ID laws aim to disenfranchise minority voters.

Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott further fueled the controversy on Tuesday when he sent a letter to the OSCE warning the organization that its representatives “are not authorized by Texas law to enter a polling place” and that it “may be a criminal offense for OSCE’s representatives to maintain a presence within 100 feet of a polling place's entrance.”

Bravo, Attorney General Abbott! Thank you for standing up for American sovereignty, the superiority of American law, and all that!

A polite warning to OSCE thugs seems in order: Although US President Obama is a quiche-eating wuss who hates America as much, or more, than you do, the American people are about to send this incompetent community organizer back to Illinois, Hawaii, or Kenya--as an unemployed victim of his own failures!

Further, we do not agree with Obama’s hysterical willingness to serve up American sovereignty to a bunch of socialist pansies!

In plain English: “Don’t Mess with Texas!”


http://thehill.com/blogs/global-affairs/un-treaties/264121-texas-sparks-international-row-with-election-observers