4.2.14

Urgent Need for Immigration “Principles” that Put Americans First!





By John W. Lillpop


Republican leaders in the US House of Representatives have issued a list of ‘Immigration Principles’ to support their abdication to those who believe that America is no longer a sovereign entity worth defending.

Indeed, the so-called Principles appear to be an open invitation to millions more who would ignore our borders and laws, all at the expense of real Americans.

GOP leaders seem to be saying, "Come one, come all! Our borders and laws mean nothing to those who will work for nothing and vote Democrat!" 

Americans must reject, out of hand, John Boehner’s foolish attempt to sabotage America’s language, culture, and borders.

Instead, the US Congress and President need to regard immigration as an issue which must be addressed intelligently to restore adherence to the rule of law, with the interests of the American people first and foremost.

Policy based on growing the Democrat party or importing cheap labor should NOT be at the heart of America’s immigration plans.

Rather, immigration standards should reflect what is best for Americans and the nation as a whole.

The following principles should be signed into law:


*America is a sovereign nation, totally independent of foreign influence. It has been that way for well over 200 years. We intend to keep it that way.

* Demanding that our borders be secured and that the law be enforced is the right of all American citizens; doing so does not make any one a racist or bigot.

*U.S. immigration laws exist to protect American citizens & others here legally, not to facilitate a foreigner’s pursuit of a better life.

*America operates according to the rule of law which applies to everyone. This is true whether one is brown, black, yellow, lily-white or red.

*Being hard-working and good hearted is commendable. However,  qualities do NOT entitle anyone to enter America illegally.

*Celebrating one’s cultural heritage is perfectly fine--as long as it does not interfere with complete and prompt assimilation into American culture, including mastery of English .

* People here illegally are criminals, and as such, are  unwelcome. American citizens will fight to have such miscreants deported, regardless of whether or not families are involved. Illegal is illegal, Family or not.

*Those who come to America must adjust to our culture and traditions. We have no obligation or desire to change in deference to foreign newcomers.

The above principles should be pounded into the heads of John Boehner, Eric Cantor, Rand Paul, Paul Ryan, and all other RINOs who would give America away, for 30 pesos of silver, or less.

RINOs need to be reminded that they do not OWN this great nation, and, thus, it is not their to give away!

Real patriots will work diligently to defeat those who would voluntarily convert America into a third-world nation.

As for a path to citizenship, such a path already exists!

However, said path does not involve jumping a fence and running like hell to hide in the shadows. Rather, the real path involves standing in line and complying with the background, financial, criminal, medical and documentation  checks needed to protect the American people!

Again: Immigration policy should be based on rule of law, rather than racial and electoral politics and cheap labor!

John Kerry Cites Another Obama Failure: Syria





By John W. Lillpop


More incredible than the lopsided victory of the Seattle Seahawks over the Denver Broncos in Superbowl 48: Barack Obama trying to convince Bill O’Reilly that the president’s woes, among which are Obamacare, Benghazi, IRS targeting of conservative groups , NSA spying, Fast and Furious gun running,  and others, exist only because of extreme unbalanced, anti-Obama fervor at Fox News!

Talk about audacity!

Obama’s pathetic smoke screen had barely been broadcast when Secretary of State John Kerry added to Barack's misery by declaring that the Obama policy in Syria is a failure.

As reported at the reference:

It is no secret that the Obama administration’s Syria policy, to the extent that one exists, is failing.

Now the man with the unenviable task of implementing that policy, Secretary of State John F. Kerry, has acknowledged as much, according to two U.S. senators who spoke with him Sunday, John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.).

Kerry said that the Geneva negotiating process hasn’t delivered, they said, and that new approaches are needed.

“He acknowledged that the chemical weapons [removal] is being slow-rolled, the Russians continue to supply arms, [and] we are at a point now where we are going to have to change our strategy,” Graham said.”

Two possible explanations come to mind for Kerry's startling announcement:

1. Kerry is a closeted reporter working undercover for FOX news, 0r

2. Barack Obama's unbridled reluctance and inability to face reality renders The One on the verge of being unfit for office.

When last America faced a crisis of emotional and functional  stability in a president, Richard M. Nixon was in charge. Thankfully, several Republicans joined forces in the interest of the nation and convinced Nixon to go back to California, sans the presidency.

The big question: Are there any Democrats with the guts and patriotism to deal with Barack  Obama?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/fred-hiatt-senators-say-john-kerry-admitted-us-failure-in-syria/2014/02/03/bfc203c0-8c75-11e3-95dd-36ff657a4dae_story.html


3.2.14

Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, & Nancy Pelosi: What Is It About California?



By John W. Lillpop

In the summer of 2013, Burt Prelutsky, columnist for the LA Times, wrote a column which offered a valuable analysis of California’s obsession with moon-bat, female politicians.

As reported at the reference, Prelutsky wrote:

“Frankly, I don’t know what it is about California , but we seem to have a strange urge to elect really obnoxious women to high office. I’m not bragging, you understand, but no other state, including Maine, even comes close. When it comes to sending left-wing dingbats to Washington, we’re number one. There’s no getting around the fact that the last time anyone saw the likes of Barbara Boxer, Dianne Feinstein, and Nancy Pelosi, they were stirring a cauldron when the curtain went up on ‘Macbeth’. The three of them are like jackasses who happen to possess the gift of blab. You don’t know if you should condemn them for their stupidity or simply marvel at their ability to form words.”

Well said, Burt!

Interestingly enough, all three of the ‘ladies’ cited are at least 70 years old, and each is clearly suffering from age-related hysteria.

By the way, please do not overlook the insanity and dysfunction of Rep. Maxine Waters, another 70-something wacko who should retire-- for the good of America!

Reference: http://republicmainstreet.wordpress.com/2010/04/02/burt-prelutsky-of-la-times-on-california-women-politicians/

2.2.14

US Congress Serious About Immigration Reform? If So, Implement Mexico's Law!





By John W. Lillpop

Nearly 30 years after the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 was signed into law by President Reagan, ostensibly to fix the illegal alien problem once and for all, America begins 2014 embroiled in yet another bitter, divisive, gut-wrenching  debate over the fate of tens of millions of illegals who reside here unlawfully.

These tens of millions of uninvited and unwelcome peoples have settled here despite IRCA and despite the terrorist attack of 9/11 which should have caused our leaders to forcibly close US borders to unlawful entry.

As US lawmakers struggle to find answers to this continuing problem, our leaders should look south to our troubled neighbors in Mexico, where some of the toughest, no-nonsense immigration laws in the world are on the books.

As reported at the reference, Mexico’s immigration laws, if enforced, could help solve America’s illegal alien problem, once and for all.

MEXICO’S GENERAL LAW OF POPULATION:

Mexico welcomes only foreigners who will be useful to Mexican society:

- Foreigners are admitted into Mexico “according to their possibilities of contributing to national progress.” (Article 32)
- Immigration officials must “ensure” that “immigrants will be useful elements for the country and that they have the necessary funds for their sustenance” and for their dependents. (Article 34)
- Foreigners may be barred from the country if their presence upsets “the equilibrium of the national demographics,” when foreigners are deemed detrimental to “economic or national interests,” when they do not behave like good citizens in their own country, when they have broken Mexican laws, and when “they are not found to be physically or mentally healthy.” (Article 37)
- The Secretary of Governance may “suspend or prohibit the admission of foreigners when he determines it to be in the national interest.” (Article 38)

Mexican authorities must keep track of every single person in the country:

- Federal, local and municipal police must cooperate with federal immigration authorities upon request, i.e., to assist in the arrests of illegal immigrants. (Article 73)
- A National Population Registry keeps track of “every single individual who comprises the population of the country,” and verifies each individual’s identity. (Articles 85 and 86)
- A national Catalog of Foreigners tracks foreign tourists and immigrants (Article 87), and assigns each individual with a unique tracking number (Article 91).

Foreigners with fake papers, or who enter the country under false pretenses, may be imprisoned:

- Foreigners with fake immigration papers may be fined or imprisoned. (Article 116)
- Foreigners who sign government documents “with a signature that is false or different from that which he normally uses” are subject to fine and imprisonment. (Article 116)

Foreigners who fail to obey the rules will be fined, deported, and/or imprisoned as felons:

- Foreigners who fail to obey a deportation order are to be punished. (Article 117)
- Foreigners who are deported from Mexico and attempt to re-enter the country without authorization can be imprisoned for up to 10 years. (Article 118)
- Foreigners who violate the terms of their visa may be sentenced to up to six years in prison (Articles 119, 120 and 121). Foreigners who misrepresent the terms of their visa while in Mexico — such as working with out a permit — can also be imprisoned.

• Under Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony. The General Law on Population says,

- “A penalty of up to two years in prison and a fine of three hundred to five thousand pesos will be imposed on the foreigner who enters the country illegally.” (Article 123)
- Foreigners with legal immigration problems may be deported from Mexico instead of being imprisoned. (Article 125)
- Foreigners who “attempt against national sovereignty or security” will be deported. (Article 126)

• Mexicans who help illegal aliens enter the country are themselves considered criminals under the law:

- A Mexican who marries a foreigner with the sole objective of helping the foreigner live in the country is subject to up to five years in prison. (Article 127)
- Shipping and airline companies that bring undocumented foreigners into Mexico will be fined. (Article 132)

MEXICO’S CONSTITUTION:[2][4]

Mexico’s Constitution
(English translation)


• The Mexican constitution expressly forbids non-citizens to participate in the country’s political life.
Non-citizens are forbidden to participate in demonstrations or express opinions in public about domestic politics. Article 9 states, “only citizens of the Republic may do so to take part in the political affairs of the country.” Article 33 is unambiguous: “Foreigners may not in any way participate in the political affairs of the country.”

• The Mexican constitution denies fundamental property rights to foreigners.
If foreigners wish to have certain property rights, they must renounce the protection of their own governments or risk confiscation. Foreigners are forbidden to own land in Mexico within 100 kilometers of land borders or within 50 kilometers of the coast.


Article 27 states, “Only Mexicans by birth or naturalization and Mexican companies have the right to acquire ownership of lands, waters, and their appurtenances, or to obtain concessions for the exploitation of mines or of waters. The State may grant the same right to foreigners, provided they agree before the Ministry of Foreign Relations to consider themselves as nationals in respect to such property, and bind themselves not to invoke the protection of their governments in matters relating thereto; under penalty, in case of noncompliance with this agreement, of forfeiture of the property acquired to the Nation. Under no circumstances may foreigners acquire direct ownership of lands or waters within a zone of one hundred kilometers along the frontiers and of fifty kilometers along the shores of the country.” (Emphasis added)

• The Mexican constitution denies equal employment rights to immigrants, even legal
ones, in the public sector.

“Mexicans shall have priority over foreigners under equality of circumstances for all classes of concessions and for all employment, positions, or commissions of the Government in which the status of citizenship is not indispensable. In time of peace no foreigner can serve in the Army nor in the police or public security forces.” (Article 32)

• The Mexican constitution guarantees that immigrants will never be treated as real Mexican citizens, even if they are legally naturalized.
Article 32 bans foreigners, immigrants, and even naturalized citizens of Mexico from serving as military officers, Mexican-flagged ship and airline crew, and chiefs of seaports and airports:

“In order to belong to the National Navy or the Air Force, and to discharge any office or commission, it is required to be a Mexican by birth. This same status is indispensable for captains, pilots, masters, engineers, mechanics, and in general, for all personnel of the crew of any vessel or airship protected by the Mexican merchant flag or insignia. It is also necessary to be Mexican by birth to discharge the position of captain of the port and all services of practique and airport commandant, as well as all functions of customs agent in the Republic.”

• An immigrant who becomes a naturalized Mexican citizen can be stripped of his Mexican citizenship if he lives again in the country of his origin for more than five years, under Article 37. Mexican-born citizens risk no such loss.

• Foreign-born, naturalized Mexican citizens may not become federal lawmakers (Article 55), cabinet secretaries (Article 91) or supreme court justices (Article 95).

• The president of Mexico must be a Mexican citizen by birth AND his parents must also be Mexican-born citizens (Article 82), thus giving secondary status to Mexican-born citizens born of immigrants.

• The Mexican constitution singles out “undesirable aliens.” Article 11 guarantees federal protection against “undesirable aliens resident in the country.”

• The Mexican constitution provides the right of private individuals to make citizen’s arrests.
Article 16 states, “in cases of flagrante delicto, any person may arrest the offender and his accomplices, turning them over without delay to the nearest authorities.” Therefore, the Mexican constitution appears to grant Mexican citizens the right to arrest illegal aliens and hand them over to police for prosecution.

• The Mexican constitution states that foreigners may be expelled for any reason and without due process.
According to Article 33, “the Federal Executive shall have the exclusive power to compel any foreigner whose remaining he may deem inexpedient to abandon the national territory immediately and without the necessity of previous legal action.”



Bottom Line: American citizens deserve to be protected from foreign invasions similar to the protections that Mexico uses to protect its citizens.

Our federal Government is responsible for defending US borders and sovereignty.

Rather than working to implement amnesty, the US Congress and President should concentrate on the needs of American citizens...and implement tough laws like that of Mexico!


* Reference: http://doctorjohnblog.com/2013/06/

1.2.14

Here’s Wishing Nancy Pelosi a Happy 74th, and a Restful Retirement!




By John W. Lillpop


On March 26, Nancy Pelosi, the person most responsible for San Francisco’s deserved reputation as a Mecca for progressive insanity, will turn 74 years old.

That’s right, Nancy Pelosi will have been on the planet for almost three quarters of a century!  The fact that the planet is still alive, if not doing so well, is a testament to the tenacity  of Mother Nature in combating idiocy!

After Pelosi’s wrecking ball career in the US House, especially her role in the corrupt takeover of the best health care system in the world and replacement thereof with the thievery popularly known as Obamacare, isn’t it time, Ms. Pelosi,  to put the wrecking ball out to pasture?

Just last week, Pelosi’s Comrade in Leftist Crime, Rep.Henry Waxman, announced that he is giving the American people, the Republic, and the entire concept of reasoned self-governance a break, by retiring from the US House!

Bravo, Comrade, Mr. Waxman! After 40 years of disservice, you finally got one right!

Now if we can just convince the embarrassing Pelosi to join Waxman in returning to the once Golden state of California to live out her remaining years as a permanent member of the detested “1 percent” crowd, America will benefit---except, that is, for those of us who still live in the dust and insanity of liberal politics gone batty!

Adios, Nancy, and thanks for exactly nothing!